Further Academic Research

In document Developing a sustainability assessment framework for ready-mixed concrete (Page 94-200)

This EngD research programme has identified some further research questions that could be answered by specific research projects or doctoral level studies. The areas of further research fall into three key areas:

1. Is an equal view of social, environmental and economic issues relevant for construction? The often quoted triple bottom line is used as an approximation for sustainable development (indeed this EngD has done the same) but is such an approach valid for the UK construction sector? There is a growing appreciation of sustainable procurement in the construction sector which could benefit from further research.

2. Can EPDs link to Responsible Sourcing and Product Stewardship principles?

This research has identified the potential proliferation of EPDs over the next few years. How could this be linked to the parallel concept of responsible sourcing and product stewardship? Are there any synergies for the construction product sector in doing so? What benefit could this have to other groups in the construction sector e.g.

architects and contractors using the information in different ways.

3. How can traditional heavy side construction materials (like concrete) be incorporated into sustainable construction systems commercially? This EngD has focused on a particular product group (ready-mixed concrete). An extension would be the use of concrete in a system that would have in-use benefits in terms of energy efficiency. There are often one-off projects that are innovative but the commercialisation and scale up of such sustainable concrete systems would be a valuable piece of research.

Aggregate Industries intends to support the third research area with the establishment of another Engineering Doctorate at Loughborough University.

5.8 SUMMARY

This chapter has presented the findings and implications of the EngD research. The impacts on the two industrial sponsors and the wider construction products industry has been acknowledged. In particular the launch of the Life brand of products represents the tangible impact this research has had on Aggregate Industries. The research has been critically evaluated and concluded that the assessment framework has more value to Aggregate Industries if aspects of it are integrated into the existing standards and procedures for the business. A series of recommendations are made for Aggregate Industries, BRE and the wider construction products sector including the need for Aggregate Industries to better understand the in-use aspects of construction products and broader economic issues in product assessment. This EngD has highlighted the need for further specific research in particular the need to focus on sustainable construction systems as an extension to the focus on sustainable products. The findings collectively will form part of the future sustainability strategy for Aggregate Industries.

6 REFERENCES

Adetunji, I., Price, A., Fleming, P. and Kemp, P. (2003). The Application of Systems

Thinking to the Concept of Sustainability. The Proceeding of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM), University of Brighton, UK, 3-5 September, 161 - 170.

Aggregate Industries. (2012). 2011 Sustainability Report, [Online] Available from:

www.aggregate.com/Documents/Brochures/Aggregate-Industries-Sustainability%20Report-2011.pdf, Accessed [10/09/2012].

Alwaer, H., Sibley, M. and Lewis, J. (2008). Different Stakeholder Perceptions of Sustainability Assessment’, Journal of Architectural Science and Review, ASR- 51.1.

Anderson, J., Shiers, D. and Steele, K. (2009). Green Guide to Specification, Fourth Edition, BRE Global, Garston, UK.

APRES (2010). Action Programme on Responsible Sourcing. [Online] Available from:

www.apres.lboro.ac.uk, Accessed [10/10/12].

Asif. M., Muneer. T. and Kelley. R. (2007). Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland, Building and Environment, 42, 1391 - 1394.

Ball. J. (2002). Can ISO 14001 and eco-labelling turn the construction industry green?

Building and Environment, 37, 421 - 428.

Bell. J. (1993). Doing your research project : a guide for first-time researchers in education and social science, Open University Press, Buckingham.

Bender, B. (2003). Sustainable development: UK Government objectives and the role of business, Proceeding of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Engineering Sustainability, ES1, 5 - 6.

Berardi, U. (2011). Comparison of sustainability rating systems for buildings and evaluation of trends, In:Proceedings of the World Sustainable Building Conference, 17-21 October 2011, Helsinki, Finland, SB11, Volume 2; 62 - 63 Extended abstract.

Berndt, M.L. (2009). Properties of sustainable concrete containing fly ash, slag and recycled concrete aggregate, Construction and Building Materials, 23(7): 2606 - 2613.

Birgisdottir. H., Bhander. G., Hauschild. M.Z. and Christensen. T.H. (2007). Life cycle assessment of disposal of residues from municipal solid waste incineration: Recycling of bottom ash in road construction or landfilling in Denmark evaluated in the ROAD-RES model, Waste Management 27, S75–S84.

Broun, R. and Menzies, G.F. (2011). Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Analysis of Partition Wall Systems in the UK, Procedia Engineering 21, 864 - 873.

Brundtland, G., editor. (1987). Our common future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

BIS (Department of Business Innovation and Skills) (2008). Strategy for Sustainable Construction, BIS, London.

BRE (2009). BES 6001 Framework Standard for the Responsible Sourcing of Construction Products, Version 2, BRE, Garston, Watford.

BRE (2008). BREEAM Manual, BRE, Garston, Watford.

BRE, (2007). Environmental Profiles Methodology, [Online] Available from:

www.bre.co.uk/greenguide/page.jsp?id=2106, Accessed [10/09/2012].

BSI, BS EN 15804 (2012). Sustainability of construction works. Environmental product declarations. Core rules for the product category of construction products, British Standards Institution, London.

BS EN 15942. (2011). Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product declarations – communication format business to business, British Standards Institution, London.

BS 8905, (2011). Framework for the assessment of the sustainable use of materials – Guide, 2011, British Standards Institution, London.

BS 8903, (2010). Principles and framework for procuring sustainably – Guide, British Standards Institution, London.

BS 8902, (2009). Responsible sourcing sector certification schemes for construction products - Specification, British Standards Institution, London.

BSI, PAS 2050 (2008): Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services [Online] Available from:

http://shop.bsigroup.com/en/Browse-by-Sector/Energy--Utilities/PAS-2050/. [Accessed:

02/06/10].

Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Routledge.

Castro-Lacouture, D., Sefair, J.A., Flórez, L. and Medaglia, A.L. (2009). Optimization model for the selection of materials using a LEED-based green building rating system in Colombia, Building and Environment, 44 (6): 1162 - 1170.

Chen, Y., Okudan, G.E. and Riley, D.R. (2010). Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings, Automation in Construction, 19(2): 235-244.

Ceequal, (2012). Ceequal Website. [Online] Available: http://www.ceequal.com [Accessed:

02/06/12].

Ceequal, (2009). Ceequal Website. [Online] Available:

http://www.ceequal.com/awards_046.htm [Accessed: 02/06/10].

Ceequal, (2008). Ceequal Project Assessment manual version 4 (now superseded), [Online]

Available from: www.ceequal.com, Accessed [10/09/2012].

Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design : choosing among five traditions. 2 edn. London: Sage.

CPA (2012). Construction Products Association, Construction Products Regulation, [Online]

Available from: www.constructionproducts.org.uk/publications/industry-affairs/display/view/construction-products-regulation/, Accessed [10/09/2012].

Dainty, A. in Knight, A. and Ruddock, L. (Ed). (2008). Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment, Riley Blackwell, Oxford.

Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). The landscape of qualitative research. 3 edn. London:

Sage.

Ding. G.K.C. (2008). Sustainable construction – The role of environmental assessment tools, Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 451 - 464

Ding, G.K.C. (2005). Developing a multi criteria approach for the measurement of sustainable performance. Building Research and Information 33 (1), 3 - 16.

Doublet, G. and Jungbluth, N. (2010). Environmental product information (EPI) and LCA.

International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16, 90 - 94.

Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A. and Benn, S. (2003). Organizational change for corporate sustainability. Routledge, Abingdon.

DCLG (2012). Department for Communities and Local Government; Building Regulations,

[Online] Available from:

www.communities.gov.uk/planningandbuilding/buildingregulations/, Accessed [10/09/2012].

Edwards. J.P. (2007). Laboratory Characterisation of Pavement Foundation Materials, EngD Thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough.

Egan, J. (1998). The Egan Report - Rethinking Construction. Report of the Construction Industry Task Force to the Deputy Prime Minister. London HMSO.

Elhag, H. (2006). Business improvement through a structured approach to sustainability in the precast concrete flooring industry, PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough.

Elghali, L., Clift, R., Begg, K.G. and Mclaren. S. (2008). Decision support methodology for complex contexts, Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, 161(1), 7 - 22.

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business”, Capstone Publishing, Oxford.

Emmenegger, M.F., Frischknecht, R., Stutz, M., Guggisberg, M., Witschi, R. and Otto, T.

(1998). Life Cycle Assessment of the Mobile Communication System UMTS. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11(4), 265 - 276.

Erlandsson. J. and Tillman. A. (2009). Analysing influencing factors of corporate environmental information collection, management and communication, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 800 - 810.

EC (2012). European Commission; A resource-efficient Europe – Flagship initiative of the Europe 2020 Strategy, [Online] Available from: www.ec.europa.eu/resource-efficient-europe/, Accessed [10/09/2012].

Fava, J., Baer, S. and Cooper, J. (2011). Green(er) product standard trends in North America.

Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15: 9-12.

Fellows, R. and Lui, A. (2003). Research Methods for Construction. 2nd edn. Oxford:

Blackwell Science.

Fernandez-Sanchez. G. and Rodriguez-Lopez. F. (2010). A methodology to identify sustainability indicators in construction project management – Application to infrastructure projects in Spain, Ecological Indicators, 10, 1193 - 1201.

Finnveden. G., Hauschild. M.Z., Ekvall. T., Guinee. J., Heijungs. R., Hellweg, S., Koehler.

A., Pennington. D. and Suh. S. (2009). Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment, Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1 - 21.

Frey. J.H. and Fontana. A. (1991). The Group Interview in Social Research, Social Science Journal, 28, 175 – 187. In Denzin and Lincoln (2000, pp 651).

Gasparatos. A., El-Harem. M. and Horner. M. (2009). The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism, Accounting Forum, 33, 245 - 256.

GHG PROTOCOL, WRI/WBCSD. (2011). Available from: www.ghgprotocol.org [Accessed 18 March 2011].

Ghumra, S., Glass, J., Frost, M. W., Watkins, M. and Mundy, J. (2012a). Testing an empirically derived sustainability assessment framework on a UK concrete manufacturer.

Journal of Industrial Ecology. Submitted manuscript July 2012. In review.

Ghumra, S., Glass, J., Frost, M. W., Watkins, M. and Mundy, J. (2012b). Internationalizing a UK-based sustainability assessment framework for construction products In: Proceedings of the Building Sustainability Assessment Conference, 23-25 May 2012, Porto, Portugal.

Ghumra, S., Watkins, M., Phillips, P., Glass, J., Frost, M.W. and Anderson, J. (2011a) Stakeholder Views on LCA in Road Pavement Construction. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Infrastructure, Hong Kong Polytechnic, Hong Kong, 11-12 July 2011.

Ghumra, S., Glass, J., Frost, M W., Watkins, M. and Mundy, J. (2011b). “Materials & Energy Assessment in Ceequal Transport Projects”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Transport 164 (3), 153 - 164.

Ghumra, S., Glass, J., Frost, M. W., Watkins, M. and Mundy, J. (2011c). Developing a Framework for the Sustainability Assessment of Construction Products In: Proceedings of the World Sustainable Building Conference, 17-21 October 2011, Helsinki, Finland, SB11, Volume 2; 420 - 421 Extended abstract.

Ghumra, S., Glass, J., Frost, M. W., Watkins, M. and Mundy, J. (2011d). Validating a set of empirically weighted sustainability indicators for construction products In: Egbu, C. and Lou, E.C.W. (Eds.) Proceedings of 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2011, Bristol, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 1115 - 1124.

Ghumra. S. (2011). Life cycle assessment of construction materials - what next? [Online]

Available from: www.aggregate.com/blog, Accessed [10/09/2012]

Ghumra, S. (2009). Life cycle assessment based tool for civil infrastructure projects.

Innovation and Research Focus, Issue No:77, May 2009, ICE, Thomas Telford, London.

Ghumra, S., Watkins, M., Phillips, P., Glass, J., Frost, M.W. and Anderson, J. (2009).

Developing a LCA-based tool for infrastructure projects. In: Dainty, A. (Ed) Procs. 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2009, Nottingham, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 1003 - 1010.

Glass, J., Achour, N., Parry, T. and Nicholson, I. (2011). “The role of responsible sourcing in creating a sustainable construction supply-chain”, CIB W65 Supply-chain integration workshop, MISBE 2011 Conference, 20-23 June 2011, Beurse an Berlage, Amsterdam.

Goggins, J., Keane, T. and Kelly, A. (2010). The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland. Energy and Buildings 42 (5), 735 – 744.

Greenbooklive, (2012). [Online] Available from: www.greenbooklive.com. [Accessed:

28/06/12]

Greeman, A. (2009). Green gets seen. [Online] Available from:

http://www.nce.co.uk/ceequal-green-gets-seen/5202646.article. [Accessed 27/06/12]

Haapio, A.. Viitaniemi, P. (2008). A critical review of building environmental assessment tools, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28(7), 469 - 482.

Halliday. S. (2010). Sustainable Construction, Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford.

Henry, M., Pardo, G., Nishimura, T. and Kato, Y. (2011). Balancing durability and environmental impact in concrete combining low-grade recycled aggregates and mineral admixtures, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55, 1060 - 1069.

Henry, M. and Kato,Y. (2011). An assessment framework based on social perspectives and Analytic Hierarchy Process: A case study on sustainability in the Japanese concrete industry.

Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 28 (4), 300 - 316.

Higgins. D. (2012) Briefing: Specifying concrete for sustainability, Proceedings of the ICE:

Engineering Sustainability, 165(2), 125 - 127.

Holton. I.R. (2009). Developing A Sector Sustainability Strategy for the UK Precast Concrete Industry, EngD Thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough.

Holton, I., Glass, J. and Price, A. (2008). Developing a successful sector sustainability strategy: six lessons from the UK construction products industry. Corp. Soc. Responsib.

Environ. Mgmt, 15: 29 - 42.

Huang, Y., Bird, R. and Bell, M. (2009). A comparative study of the emissions by road maintenance works and the disrupted traffic using life cycle assessment and micro-simulation.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment, 2009, 14(3), 197 - 204.

Ingwersen, W.W. and Stevenson.M.J. (2012). Can we compare the environmental performance of this product to that one? An update on the development of product category rules and future challenges toward alignment, Journal of Cleaner Production 24,102 - 108.

ICE Database (2009). Inventory of Carbon & Energy, University of Bath, [Online] Available from: www.bath.ac.uk/research/features/embodiedenergy.html, Accessed [10/09/2012].

IEMA, (2012). IEMA Members Propose Changes to ISO 14001 to Achieve Significant Business and Environmental Benefits, [Online] Available from: www.iema.net/news/iema-

members-propose-changes-iso-14001-achieve-significant-business-and-environmental-benefits, Accessed [10/09/2012].

IGT, (2010). Low Carbon Construction-Innovation & Growth Team; Final Report. London HMSO.

ISO 14067-1, (2010). Carbon footprint of products: Part 1 - Quantification, International Standards Organisation, Brussels.

ISO 9001, (2008). Quality Management, International Standards Organisation, Brussels.

ISO 21930, (2007). Sustainability in building construction – environmental declaration of building products, International Standards Organisation, Brussels.

ISO 14044 (2006). Environmental management -- Life cycle assessment -- Requirements and guidelines, International Standards Organisation, Brussels.

ISO 14040 (2006). Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and framework, International Standards Organisation, Brussels.

ISO 14025, (2006). Environmental labels and declarations – Type III environmental declarations – Principles and framework, International Standards Organisation, Brussels.

ISO 14001, (2004). Environmental Management, International Standards Organisation, Brussels .

ISO 14021, (2001). Environmental labels and declarations: Self declared environmental claims (Type II Environmental labelling), International Standards Organisation, Brussels.

ISO 14024. (2001). Environmental labels and declarations – Type I environmental labelling – Principles and procedures. ISO (International Organization for Standardization), Brussels.

Jeswani, H.K., Azapagic, A., Schepelmann, P. and Ritthoff, M. (2010). Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18(2), 120 - 127.

Khasreen, M.M., Banfill. P.F.G. and Menzies. G.F. (2009). Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review, Sustainability, 1, 674 - 701.

Kilbert, C.J. (2007). The next generation of sustainable construction, Building Research &

Information, 2007, 35(6), 595 - 601.

Kinuthia, J.M. and Oti, J.E. (2012). Designed non-fired clay mixes for sustainable and low carbon use. Applied Clay Science 59–60, 131 - 139.

Koehler. A. (2008) Water use in LCA: managing the planet’s freshwater resources, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13, 451 - 455.

Latham, M. (1994). Constructing the team – Final report, London HMSO.

Lippiatt, B. and Ahmad, S. (2004). Measuring the life-cycle environmental and economic performance of concrete: the BEES approach. In: International workshop on sustainable development and concrete technology, Beijing; May 20 - 21.

Lee. B., Trcka, M. and Hensen. J.L.M. (2011). Embodied energy of building materials and green building rating systems – A case study for industrial halls, Sustainable Cities and Society, 1, 67 - 71.

Lozano, R. (2012). Towards better embedding sustainability into companies’ systems: an analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production 25, 14 - 26.

Lozano, R. and Huisingh, D. (2011). Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting, Journal of Cleaner Production 19, 99 - 107.

Lozano, R. (2008). Developing collaborative and sustainable organisations. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 499 - 509.

May, N. (2009). Environmental Assessment of Building Materials and the Green Guide:

where do we go from here? [Online] Available from:

www.goodhomes.org.uk/downloads/pages/GHA%20Green%20Guide%20critique%20-%20where%20do%20we%20go%20from%20here%20(April%2009).pdf, Accessed [10/09/2012].

Merton. R.K., Fiske. M. and Kendall. P.L. (1956). The Focused Interview, Glencoe, IL, Free press. In Denzin and Lincoln (2000, pp 651)

Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook.

2 edn. Thousand Oaks, California. London: Sage.

Mirvis, P., Googins, B. and Kinnicutt, S. (2010). Vision, mission, values: Guideposts to sustainability, Organizational Dynamics, 39: 316 - 324.

Mohrman. S.A. and Worley. C.G. (2010). The organisational sustainability journey:

Introduction to the special issue, Organizational Dynamics, 39, 289 - 294.

Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S. and Olsson, L. (2007). Categorising tools for sustainability assessment, Ecological Economics, 60(3), 498 - 508.

OHSAS 18001, (2007). Occupational Health and Safety, British Standards Institution, London.

Ortiz, O., Castells, F. and Sonnemann, G. (2009). Sustainability in the construction industry:

A review of recent developments based on LCA, Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), 28 - 39.

Özdemir, E.D., Härdtlein, M., Jenssen, T., Zech, D. and Eltrop, L. (2011). A confusion of tongues or the art of aggregating indicators - Reflections on four projective methodologies on sustainability measurement. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15(5), 2385 -2396.

Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Third edn. London: Sage Publications.

Pons, O. and Aguado, A. (2012). Integrated value model for sustainable assessment applied to technologies used to build schools in Catalonia, Spain. Building and Environment 53, 49 - 58.

Pulselli, R.M., Simoncini. E., Ridolfi. R. and Bastianoni. S. (2008). Specific emergy of cement and concrete: An energy-based appraisal of building materials and their transport, Ecological Indicators, 8, 647 - 656.

Rich. D., Goodier. C., Gibb. A.G.F. and Glass. J. (2012). UK contractors’ views on self-compacting concrete in construction, Proceedings of the ICE - Construction Materials, 165(4), 201 - 210.

Santero, N.J., Masanet. E. and Horvath. A. (2011). Life-cycle assessment of pavements Part II: Filling the research gaps, Resources, Conservations and Recycling, 55, 810 - 818.

Sarkis, J., Meade. L.M. and Presley. A.R. (2012). Incorporating sustainability into contractor and team formation in the built environment, Journal of Cleaner Production 31, 40 - 53.

Schroeder, D.M. & Robinson, A.G. (2010). Green is free: Creating sustainable competitive advantage through green excellence, Organizational Dynamics, 39: 345-352.

Senner. R., (2012). Appraising the sustainability of project alternatives: An increasing role for cumulative effects assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 31, 502 - 505

SERA (2011). Socially and Environmentally Responsible Aggregates, [Online] Available from: www.seracanada.ca, Accessed [10/09/2012].

Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. 3 edn. London: Sage.

Singh, R.J., Murty., H.R., Gupta. S.K. and Dikshit. A.K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies, Ecological Indicators, 15, 281 - 299.

Skaar, C. and Fet, A.M., (2012). Accountability in the Value Chain: From Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) to CSR Product Declaration, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, DOI: 10.1002/csr.275.

Skanska (2009). Skanska Sustainable Procurement Policy. [Online] Available from:

www.greenprocurementcode.co.uk/files/SkanskaSustainableProcurement-Sept09.pdf, accessed [18/09/2012].

Steele, K., Cole, G., Clarke, G. and Harding, J. (2003). Environmental impact of brick arch bridge management, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, 156(3), 273 - 281.

Strategic Forum for Construction (2008). [Online] Available from:

www.cic.org.uk/strategicforum/pdf/targets.pdf, Accessed [10/09/2012].

Strazza. C., Del Borgi. A., Blengini, G.A. and Gallo. M. (2010). Definition of the methodology for a sector EPD: case staudy of the average Italian cement, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 540 - 548.

Stripple, H. (2001). Life Cycle Assessment of Road. Second Revised Edition edn.

Gothenburg, Sweden: Swedish Environmental Research Institute.

SuPerBuildings, (2012). Recommendations for next generation of assessment systems, Building Sustainability Assessment conference Porto, Portugal, 24th May 2012, 0900 - 1230;

Room 4.

Sustainable Concrete (2010). [Online] Available from: www.sustainableconcrete.org.uk/, Accessed [10/09/2012].

Tam, W.Y.V., Tam. L. and Le. K.N. (2010). Cross-cultural comparison of concrete recycling decision making and implementation in construction industry. Waste Management 30; 291-297.

The Concrete Centre (2010). [Online] Available from: www.concretecentre.com, Accessed [10/09/2012].

Toledo Filho, R.D., Koenders, E.A.B., Formagini, S. and Fairbairn, E.M.R. (2012).

Performance assessment of Ultra High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites in view of sustainability. Materials & Design 36, 880 - 888.

Ugwu. O.O. and Haupt. T.C. (2007). Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability – a South African construction industry perspective, Building and Environment, 42, 665 - 680.

Udo De Haes, H.A., Heijungs, R., Suh, S. and Huppes, G. (2004). Three strategies to overcome the limitations of Life-cycle assessment, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2004, 8(3), 19 - 32.

Van den Heede, P. and De Belie, N. (2012). Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations.

Cement and Concrete Composites 34(4), 431 - 442.

Wallbaum, H., Ostermeyer, Y., Salzer, C. and Escamilla, E.Z. (2012). Indicator based sustainability assessment tool for affordable housing construction technologies. Ecological Indicators 18, 353 - 364.

WRAP (2010). Waste Resources Action Programme, Aggregate Quality Protocols, [Online]

Available from: www.aggregain.wrap.org.uk/quality/quality_protocols/, Accessed [10/09/2012].

Zackrisson. M., Rocha. C., Christiansen. K. and Jarnehammar. A. (2008). Stepwise

environmental product declarations; ten SME case studies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1872 - 1886.

Zhou, C.C., Yin, G.F. and Hu, X.B. (2009). Multi-objective optimization of material selection for sustainable products: Artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. Materials

& Design 30 (4), 1209 - 1215.

APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK

Sustainability Assessment Framework for Ready-mixed Concrete

DRG 7001: 2012

This assessment framework is the product of the Engineering Doctorate at Loughborough University which is a collaborative work

between Aggregate Industries and BRE supported by funding

through the EPSRC

Issue 0.1 Framework Standard for the Sustainability Assessment of Ready-mixed Concrete

DRG 7001

March 2012 Page 2 of 19

Contents

1 Participating Organisations ...87

2 Foreword ...88

3 Scope ...88

4 Methodology ...89

5 Definitions ...89

6 Product Assessment ...90

7 Manufacture Assessment ...94

8 Use Assessment ... 101

Issue 0.1 Framework Standard for the Sustainability Assessment of Ready-mixed Concrete

DRG 7001

March 2012 Page 3 of 19

PARTICIPATING ORGANISATIONS

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY

Loughborough University is a leading Higher Education establishment in the UK. Loughborough is consistently ranked amongst the top 20 universities in the country with particular strengths in sports and engineering. The School of Civil and Building Engineering is home to the Centre for Innovative and Collaborative Construction Engineering (CICE) through which the four-year Engineering Doctorate (EngD) programme is managed. CICE has over 13 years of experience of working with industry to produce high quality academic work with direct industrial benefit. The EngD is supported by funding through the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC).

AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES

Aggregate Industries UK Ltd is a construction and building materials company which has innovation in sustainable products at the core of its strategy. Aggregate Industries exhibits leadership behaviour through the development and launch of products tackling a wide range of global and local

Aggregate Industries UK Ltd is a construction and building materials company which has innovation in sustainable products at the core of its strategy. Aggregate Industries exhibits leadership behaviour through the development and launch of products tackling a wide range of global and local

In document Developing a sustainability assessment framework for ready-mixed concrete (Page 94-200)