Fractures of distal radius are common and appear simple, affect the function of wrist and hand considerably. It is most common fracture encountered in outpatient department. Majority of these fractures are unstable resulting in loss of reduction and hence malunion, poor range of motion and early arthritis, altered wrist kinematics and early arthritis. For better outcome of management the goals of treatment are
1. To achieve perfect anatomical reduction and maintain the reduction till union
2. Early mobilisation to achieve good range of movements and to prevent stiffness.
3. To prevent early and late complication
In unstable distal radius fractures both the techniques of managements K wire fixation and casting and closed reduction and casting gives near equal results in terms of functional outcome. Better anatomical reduction and maintenance of reduction can be expected with K wire fixation and casting group.
77
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1) Clancey G. Percutaneous Kirschner-wire fixation of Colles fractures: a prospectivestudy of thirty cases.J Bone Joint Surg [Am]1984;66-A:1008- 14.
2) Mah ET, Atkinson RN.Percutaneous Kirschner wire stabilisation following closed reduction of Colles’ fractures.J Hand Surg [Am] 3) Rayhack JM. The history and evolution of percutaneous pinning of
displaced distal radius fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 1993;24:287-300 4) Green DP. Pins and plaster treatment of comminuted fractures of the
distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1975;57-A:304-10
5) Weber SC, Szabo RM. Severely comminuted distal radial fracture as an unsolved problem: complications associated with external fixation and pins and plaster techniques. J Hand Surg [Am] 1986;11:157-65.
6) Frykman G. Fractures of the distal radius including sequelae-
shoulder-hand-finger syndrome, disturbance in the distal radio-ulnar joint and impairment of nerve function: a clinical and experimental study. Acta Orthop Scand 1967;Suppl 108:3.
7) Jung JM, Baek GH, Kim JH, Lee YH, Chung MS. Changes in ulnar variance inrelation to forearm rotation and grip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:1029-33.
78
8) Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Plaster cast versus percutaneous pin fixation for comminuted fractures of the distal radius in patients between 46 and 65 years of age.J Orthop Trauma 1997;11:212-17.
9) Naidu SH, Capo JT, Moulton M, Ciccone W 2nd, Radin A. Percutaneous pinning of distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg [Am] 1997;22:252-7.
10) Jesse B, Jupiter MD. Complex Articular Fractures of the Distal Radius: Classification and Management. J Am Acad Orthop
Surg 1997; 5: 119-29.
11) Knirk JL, Jupiter JB. Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg 1986; 68: 647-59.
12) Wong TC, Chiu Y. Casting Versus Percutaneous Pinning for Extra- ArticularFractures of the Distal Radius in an Elderly Chinese Population: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Hand Surg 35E:202-208, 2010.
13) Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group(UECG) Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8. Erratum in: Am J Ind Med 1996 Sep0(3):372.
14) Margaret McQueen, Jeanette Caspers – Colles fracture – Does the anatomical result affect the final function. - Journal of
79
Bone and Joint Surgery (Br); 1988; 70-B, 649- 651.
15) Diego L.Fernandez and Andrew K. Palmer: Fractures of the distal radius – Green’s Operative hand surgery. 929-989. 16) Mark S. Cohen, Robert Y.McMurtry and Jesse B.Jupiter:
Fractures of the distal radius – Skeletal Trauma. 1315-1361. 17) A.Sarmiento, G.W Pratt, N.C Berry and W.F Sinclair: Colles’ fracture, functional bracing in supination - Journal of
Bone and Joint Surgery (Am); 1975; 57, 311-317.
18) W.Van der Linden and R. Ericsson: Colles fracture. How should its displacement be measured and how should it be
immobilized?- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) 1981;63, 1285-1288.
19) J.B.Jupiter: Current concepts review – Fractures of distal end of radius. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) 1991; 73,
461-469.
20) T. Azzopardi, S. Ehrendorfer, T. Coulton, M. Abela Unstable extra-articular fractures of the distal radius a prospective, randomised study ofimmobilisation in a cast versus supplementary percutaneous pinning. J Bone Joint Surg Br June 2005 vol. 87-B no. 6 837-840
APPENDIX I
DISABILITY OF ARM, SHOULD
SCORING TO EVALAUATE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME
80
APPENDIX I
DISABILITY OF ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND (DASH) SCORING TO EVALAUATE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME
ER AND HAND (DASH) SCORING TO EVALAUATE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME
82
APPENDIX II
LINDSTROM AND FRYKMAN GRADING FOR ANANTOMICAL OUTCOME DEFORMITY GRADE DORSAL ANGULATION RADIAL SHORTENING GRADE I (No significant
deformity)
Not exceeding
neutral < 3 mm
GRADE II (Mild deformity)
1-10˚ 3 - 6 mm GRADE III (Moderate deformity)
11-14˚ 7 - 11 mm
GRADE IV (Severe deformity)
83
APPENDIX III
CONSENT FORM ÑV Jl×Rp T¥Ym
U¦dLhÓ GÛm× Ø±®tÏ Lm© ùTôÚj§ AßûY £¡fûN ùNnRYu TXuLs Utßm ®û[ÜLs
BWônf£ ¨ûXVm : AWÑ vPôu UÚjÕYUû]
ùNuû] - 600 001.
TeÏ ùTßm úSôVô°«u ùTVo :
YVÕ :
Bi/ùTi :
TeÏ ùTßTY¬u Gi :
¸rLiP Yt±p TeÏ ùTßTYo ()ϱdLÜm
1. úUúX ϱl©PlThÓs[ UÚjÕY Bn®u ®YWeLs
G]dÏ GuàûPV RônùUô¯«p ®[dLlThPÕ.
GuàûPV NkúRLeLû[ úLhLÜm, ARtLô] RÏkR ®[dLeLû[ ùT\Üm YônlT°dLlThPÕ.
2. Sôu CqYôn®p Ru²fûNVôL TeúLt¡ú\u. GkR LôWQj§]ôÛm GkRd LhPj§Ûm Gq®Rf NhP £dLÛdÏm EhTPôUp Sôu CqYôn®p CÚkÕ ®X¡d ùLôs[Xôm GuTûR A±kÕ ùLôiúPu.
3. CkR BnÜ NmTkRUôLúYô ApXÕ CûR NôokR úUÛm BnÜ úUtùLôsÞmúTôúRô CkR Bn®p TeÏ ùTßm UÚjÕYo GuàûPV UÚjÕY A±dûLLû[ TôolTRtÏ Gu AàU§ úRûY CpûX G] A±kÕ ùLôs¡ú\u. Bn®ÚkÕ Sôu ®X¡d ùLôiPôÛm CÕ ùTôÚkÕm G] A±¡ú\u.
84
4. CkR Bn®p Sôu TeÏùT\ Jl×d ùLôs¡ú\u. G]dÏ ùLôÓdLlThP A±ÜûWL°uT¥ SPkÕ ùLôsYÕPu CkR BnûY úUtùLôsÞm UÚjÕY A¦dÏ EiûUÙPu CÚlúTu Gußm Eߧ A°d¡ú\u.
5. GuàûPV EPp ¨ûX Tô§dLlThPôúXô ApXÕ G§oTôWôR YZdLj§tÏ Uô\ô] úSônϱ ùRuThPôúXô EPú] ARû] UÚjÕY A¦dÏ ùR¬®lúTu G] Eߧ A°d¡ú\u.
6. AßûY£¡fûNdÏ Øu]Úm, AßûY £¡fûN«u
úTôÕm, ARtÏ ©u]Úm CWjRl T¬úNôRû]Ls,
FÓL§oLs (X-Ray) GÓdLÜm, UVdLUÚkÕ ùLôÓjÕ
AßûY£¡fûN êXm U¦dLhÓ GÛm× Ø±®tÏ Lm© ùTôÚjRÜm NmURm A°d¡ú\u. 7. Gu SXu LÚ§úV CkR BnÜ úUtùLôs[lTÓ¡\Õ Guß ùR¬kÕ CkR Bn®tÏ Jl×Rp A°d¡ú\u. Sôs : CPm : TeúLtTY¬u ûLùVôlTm ApXÕ CPÕ ûL ùTÚ®Wp úWûL (CkR T¥Ym T¥jÕ LôhPlThÓ ×¬kÕ ûLúWûL A°d¡uú\u) TeúLtTY¬u ùTVo Utßm ®XôNm
--- ---
85
úSôVô° RLYp T¥Ym
U¦dLhÓ GÛm× Ø±®tÏ Lm© ùTôÚj§ AßûY £¡fûN ùNnRYu TXuLs Utßm ®û[ÜLs
úSôVô°dLô] RLYpLs BWônf£«u úSôdLØm BRôWeLÞm
CkR Bn®u êXm U¦dLhÓ GÛm× Ø±®tÏ Lm© ùTôÚj§ AßûY £¡fûN ùNnRYu TXuLs Utßm ®û[ÜLs LiP±VlTÓm.
A[ÅÓLs
FÓL§o (X-Ray) TPj§p AßûY £¡fûNdÏl©u EûPkR GÛm×
Ju\ôL úNÚRp.
AßûY £¡fûNdÏl©u Gq®R ETLWQj§u ER®Ùªu± Ïß¡V LôXj§p ûL ØÝûUVôL ÏQUûPRp.
BnÜ Øû\Ls
AßûY £¡fûN êXm Lm© êXm GÛm× Ø±ûY N¬ ùNnRp.
Bn®p EeLs E¬ûULs
EeLs UÚjÕYl T§úYÓLs ªLÜm AkRWeLUôL ûYjÕd
ùLôs[lTÓm. CkR Bn®u Ø¥ÜLs A±®Vp Tj§¬dûL«p
©WѬdLlTÓm. B]ôp, ùTVûW ùY°«ÓYRuêXm ¿eLs AûPVô[m
LiÓ ùLôs[lTPUôh¼oLs. CkR Bn®p EeL[Õ TeúLt×
Ru²fûNVô]Õ. úUÛm, EeLÞdÏ ®ÚlTªpûXùV²p LôWQeLs GûRÙm á\ôUúXúV CkR Bn®ÚkÕ GkR úSWj§Ûm ¿eLs ®X¡d ùLôs[Xôm. CkR Bn®]ôp HúRàm TdL ®û[ÜLs HtT¥u ARtϬV ØÝ £¡fûNÙm UÚjÕYd ÏÝ®]Wôp A°dLlTÓm. úSôVô°«u ûLùVôlTm Sôs : ApXÕ CPÕ ûL ùTÚ®Wp úWûL CPm :
86
APPENDIX IV
CLINICAL PROFORMA 1. Name 2. Age 3. Sex 4. In-Patient no. 5. Mode of injury 6. Side of injury 7. Dominant side 8. Occupation9. Address and contact no. 10. AO type
11. Associated injury
12. Associated complications 13. Date of injury
14. Date of surgery / plaster immobilization 15. Date of K Wires / plaster removal
16. Preoperative radiology Radial length – Volar tilt –