DISCUSSION: THE STUDENTS’ VIEW

In document My Story. Digital Storytelling across Europe for Social Cohesion (Page 107-112)

Zisoula Gkoutsioukosta

4. DISCUSSION: THE STUDENTS’ VIEW

Messages from the analysis of research data so far are very encouraging. Digital storytelling can be effectively combined with student-centered teaching methods, such as collaborative and project – based learning. Moreover, digital storytelling fosters interdisciplinary approach and contributes to the creative integration of new technologies. It strengthens co-operation, promotes creativity and helps connect the school with everyday life.

It seems that implementing digital storytelling into the language arts classroom motivates pupils’ philanagnosia (love of reading) and helps them in deepening their understanding of literary texts, as students’ answers indicate:

I considered literature to be something old and ‘moldy’. With digital storytelling, literature course becomes more interesting, more modern... (student A)

I liked the combination of literature and digital storytelling. The lesson was better, cheerful - how to say it? - more attractive! It was definitely a nicer way to read and understand literary texts... (student B)

Creating my digital story made me think more on the novel I have read. The topic I had chosen for the digital story made me think more on the book ... (student C)

Most students, also report in their interviews that the use of digital storytelling has made their contact with literature more attractive and has created strong reading motivations. The digital book trailers prepared by the teacher, the digital story that the students themselves made on the novel they had read, as well as the digital stories of their classmates were indicated by the students as ways in which digital storytelling motivated them in reading literature. Most students state that they would not have read any novel, if they had not watched the digital book trailers, while others reported that they would not have completed the reading of the book and they would have probably put down the book halfway through, if they did not have to make their own digital storytelling on the novel they had chosen. Moreover, a lot of them were strongly motivated by their classmates’ digital stories to read more literary books, other than the one they have chosen at first, while most of them denoted that they intend to read some of the books that were presented by their classmates during the summer vacation.

In addition, through digital storytelling, students have the opportunity to produce spontaneous personal discourse for authentic purposes of communication, to reflect on and express their identity and to find their personal voice.

Although it was quite difficult for me to find my personal voice, to express my personal thoughts, as at school we rarely have the opportunity to write personal texts – most of the texts we are asked to write are mainly reports and essays that in fact do not express our own personal opinions -, I really liked that I had the opportunity to express my thoughts on a particular subject freely. I also enjoyed that the recipients of my story would be the whole class, not solely the teacher, as usual… (student D)

Furthermore, by creating digital stories students approach multimodally the literary texts, exploring the structure and function of other semiotic resources beyond the word, engaging in modern multimedia environments, practising alongside traditional literacies, contemporary multiliteracies such as digital literacy, media literacy and most importantly critical literacy. They acquire as well a wide range of semiotic skills related not only to the written text but to the evolving multimedia spectrum of modern cultural production. I liked experimenting with digital storytelling. I knew how to make a video, but I went further with this project. I understood how television programs and TV spots work ... how they manipulate us... For example how a toy ad, targeting at kids, works... Behind the images, that seem random and innocent, there is an intense processing ... The selection of images is not accidental, there is a hidden meaning behind their choice ... The narration, as well, conveys meanings…You convey meanings through the voice, through the change of tone and pace... There is always a hidden meaning… I liked this analysis we made, through our own digital stories, this kind of ‘unlocking’ meaning. It’s kind of ‘unlocking’ the world around you, as well... (student E)

Digital storytelling may eventually prove to be an invaluable technological weapon in the teacher’s arsenal of language arts classroom , as well as the modern teacher in general. I would not change anything in this digital storytelling project! I would change the lessons at school ... The way we do other lessons is to change… We should definitely do other subjects using digital storytelling, too… Language, History, Political Education, English... All of them! (student F)

5. CONCLUSION

Findings show that digital storytelling could be implemented in creative ways in all phases of a literature course. During the pre-reading phase, digital storytelling strongly motivated learners, even enabling the activation of the weakest and most reluctant students. It facilitated the creation of a framework of reflection on the topic of the course unit, involving students dynamically in a variety of activities, that included research on the field and personal expression activities drawing on their personal experiences and their previous knowledge. Students might not have responded with the same rigor if they were not to create a digital story. By creating their digital stories, students had the opportunity to explore different aspects of their topic on the web, to study and organize in a critical view their resources, and to cross out information and compose rich texts. At the same time, they were given the opportunity to combine previous knowledge, share their experiences and express themselves by articulating their own personal speech for authentic communication purposes. They have also been involved in the selection and organization of the multimedia resources, enriching the meanings of their narratives and using other semiotics other than word for their expression. Thus, they were familiarized with a playful and creative way with the basic concepts and the context of the course unit and they were properly prepared for the main reading phase, practicing besides traditional literacies and modern multiliteracies.

With the digital stories that were created during and after the reading phase, students had the opportunity to present in a more modern and interactive way their personal reading responses to the literary texts they had read. Moreover, by reconstituting, through the

selection of the appropriate multimedia, the atmosphere and the time of their books and by animating the book characters on the screen, deepened their understandings of the novels they had read and reflected both on the ways in which meaning is constructed in a literary text and in a multimodal text, such as their digital story.

In conclusion, they were able to articulate their own personal voice, to exercise their reading and semiotics skills, by experimenting with the dynamics of other semiotics than word and by exploring the multiple symbolic loads of multimedia, and to ultimately take on a more active and empowering role, moving beyond the position of the student - reader in the position of the student - writer, upgrading their point of view and finally refreshing their perspectives.

REFERENCES

Alonso, I., Molina, S., & Porto, M. D. (2015). Multimodal digital storytelling. Multimodality

and Cognitive Linguistics, 78, 147.

Altrichter, H. Posh, P., Somekh, B. (2005). Teachers Investigate their Work: An Introduction

to the Methodology of Action Research. London: Routledge.

Apostolidou, V., & Hodolidou, E. (2006). Literature and Education. Athens: Typothito - Dardanos.

Apostolidou, V., & Hodolidou, E. (2004). Reading Literature at School ... A New Teaching

Proposal. Athens: Typothito - Dardanos.

Apostolidou, V., Kokkoris, D, Bakogiannis M., & Hodolidou E. (eds) (2018). Reading

Literature at School and in Society. Athens: Gutenberg.

Baldry, A., & Thibault P. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimedia

toolkit and coursebook. London: Equinox Publishing.

Bezemer, J., & Jewitt C. (2010). “Multimodal Analysis: Key issues”. In: L. Litosseliti (ed),

Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Continuum, 180-197.

Bull, Ε., & Kajder, S. (2004). Digital Storytelling in the Language Arts Classroom.

International Society for Technology in Education, 32, p. 46-49.

Burgess, J. (2006). “Hearing ordinary voices: Cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital storytelling”, Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 20 (2), 201 - 214. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research.

London: Falmer.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social

Futures. London: Routledge.

Davis, A. (2004). “Co-authoring identity: Digital storytelling in an urban middle school”,

THEN: Technology, Humanities, Education & Narrative (1).

Flihan, S. (2013). Telling Tales with Talking Texts: Developing Language and Literacy with digital tools, in T .Wittingham et al (ed), Technological Tools for the literacy classroom.

Frey, K. (1986). Project method. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis (in Greek).

Government Gazette, Curriculum for the Language & Literature Course of the Secondary School, 2, no. Sheet 1562, 27/06/2011.

Gubrium, A., & Turner K. (2011). “Digital Storytelling as an Emergent Method for Social Research and Practice”. The Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research, Sharlene Hesse-Biber ed., Oxford University Press, 469-491.

Integration of ICT in Literature Teaching. Proceedings of the 4th Panhellenic

Conference “Integration and Use of ICT in the Educational Process”. Thessaloniki: ETPE.

Gkoutsioukosta, Z. (2018). Digital Stories: From student-reader to student- writer. In Apostolidou, V., et al (eds) (2018). Reading Literature at School and in Society (pp.729- 740). Athens: Gutenberg.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of multiple Intelligences. New York : Βasic Books.

Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written

communication, 22(2), 224-261.

Hull, G. & Katz, M. (2006). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies in digital storytelling.

Research in the Teaching of English, 41, 43-81.

Katsarou, E. & Tsafos, V. (2003). From research to teaching. The educational research action, Athens: Savalas.

Katsarou, E. (2016). Educational Research - Action. A multidimensional research to reform

the educational act. Athens: Critique Publications.

Kearney, M. (2011). “A learning design for student generated digital storytelling”,

Learning, Media and Technology, 36(2), 169 -188.

Kulla - Abbot, T. (2006). Developing literacy practices through digital storytelling. Doctoral Dissertation. Saint Louis, United States: University of Missouri.

Kress, G. (1994). An English Curriculum for the future, Changing English, 1(2), 97-112. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The modes and media of

contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in New Media Age. New York: Routledge.

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen T.(2006). Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London/ New York : Routledge.

Lambert, J. (2013). Seven Stages: Story and the Human Experience. Berkeley, CA: Digital Diner Press.

Lambert, J. (2013). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community. New York: Routledge.

Langer, J. (1994). A response-based approach to reading literature. Language Arts, 71(3), 203-211.

LeVine, P., & Scollon R. (Eds.). (2004). Discourse and Technology: Multimodal discourse

analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Nilsson, M. (2010). “Developing voice in digital storytelling through creativity, narrative and multimodality”, Seminar.net:International Journal of Media, Technology and

Lifelong Learning, 6(2), 148 -160.

Nixon, A. (2009). “Mediating social thought through digital storytelling”, Pedagogies: An

International Journal, 4(1). 63-76.

O’Halloran, K.(2004). Multimodal discourse analysis. London: Continuum.

Ohler, J. (2008). Digital Storytelling in the Classroom: New Media Pathways to Literacy,

Learning and Creativity. Thousand Oaks CA:Corwin Press.

Porter, B. (2004). Digitales, the Art of Telling Digital Stories. Armstrong.

Robin, B. (2008a). Digital Storytelling: A Powerful Technology Tool for the 21st Century Classroom, Theory into Practice, 47, 220-228.

Robin, B. (2008b). The effective uses of digital storytelling as a teaching and learning tool.

Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts

engaged student learning”, Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 487 -506.

Selber, S. A. (2004) Multiliteracies for a Digital Age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP. Strauss, A., & Corbin J., Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for

Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a Digital World: Teaching and Learning in the Age of Information. New York: Routledge.

Vasudevan, L., Schultz K., & Bateman J. (2010). “Rethinking composing in a digital age: Authoring literate identities through multimodal storytelling”, Written

Communication, 27(4), 442 - 468.

Ware, P., & Warschauer M. (2005). “Hybrid literacy texts and practices in technology - intensive environments”, International Journal of Educational Research, 43(7-8), 432 - 445.

Yang, Y. F. D. (2012). Multimodal composing in digital storytelling. Computers and

Rewind: unpacking the media ecology of today’s

In document My Story. Digital Storytelling across Europe for Social Cohesion (Page 107-112)