Geographical areas and zodiacal rulership. In Ptolemaic astrology

"zodiacal rulerships" were attributed to rather vaguely defined regions of the then known world — each broad region being correlated to a sign of the zodiac.

The zones of rulership radiated in a somewhat peculiar manner from the Mediterranean sea, center of the civilization of the period. In the course of centuries, these zones became the dwelling places of numerous nations; so that rather dissimilar nations still retained the same zodiacal sign as ruler (for

instance, France and Italy, under Leo; England, Denmark and Germany under

Aries, etc.) The validity of these rulerships has been challenged and modified by astrologers; new rulerships have been attributed to cities, provinces, etc. This has led to much confusion.

Several decades ago Albert Ross Parsons (and later Sepharial) sought to establish a direct correlation between bands of earth longitude and zodiacal signs or constellations, on the principle that the earth globe could be considered as a microcosm of the macrocosm, the celestial sphere. Granted that such a correspondence between the celestial sphere and our globe is possible, two problems must be solved: A. Does the correspondence refer to constellations, or to signs of the zodiac? B. From where do we have to start — that is, what longitude on earth corresponds to Aries 0º?

According to Parsons each geographical continent and region corresponds to, and has affinity for, one particular constellation of fixed stars — always the same. This type of correspondence might be said to be the same as that according to which Aries "rules" the head, Taurus the neck, Gemini the

shoulders and lungs, etc. Man is seen as the microcosm and the universe as the macrocosm — and the correspondence between the two has proven its worth beyond doubt in natal astrology. Symbolical diagrams have been made in

which a man bent backward, with feet touching head, is encircled by the zodiac, Aries at the head, Pisces at the feet.

In such a symbolical correlation, however, what should be made to correspond to the human body, I believe, is not the zodiac of constellations, but the zodiac of signs. In other words, it is the first month after the vernal equinox — i.e. the beginning of spring which corresponds to the head, not a group of fixed stars;

and the feet are connected with the last of the twelve divisions of the solar year rather than with the constellation Pisces. This same type of equivalence could be used, substituting the earth's globe for the human body. However, the difficulty then is of deciding which longitudinal section of the earth's surface corresponds to the sign Aries — and by implication to the human head. It has been assumed, in England especially, that the Greenwich meridian corresponds to Aries 0º'; but such an assumption can certainly be challenged. The problem refers to what we might call "occult geography" and the field is too big, its implications too far reaching, to be discussed here.

The type of correspondence which Albert Ross Parsons was interested in was, however, one in which the entire celestial map of the constellations could be focused upon the entire globe of the earth and particular stars would be

connected with particular geographical locations. But, from this point of view, it is fairly evident that one should take into consideration the fact that the zodiacal longitudes of stars change constantly, due to the cyclic movement called

"precession of the equinoxes." If the celestial sphere is projected upon our globe, the equator and the ecliptic are two circles which intersect each other;

and their points of intersection (Aries and Libra 0º') shift constantly westward,

accomplishing a complete circuit in about 25,868 years. This shift can be related to the often mentioned "westward march of empires." It can be taken to mean that a projection of the star-pattern (constellations) upon our globe should likewise shift. Thus the constellation which could be said to "rule" England in the year 1000 A.D. is now ruling the vast expanse of the Atlantic Ocean. It will rule once more what remains of the British Isles around 27,000 A.D.

It is upon such a type of reasoning that Edward Johndro established about twenty years ago his system of geographical astrology, and sought to help

individuals to discover the location to which their own birth-charts attuned them most favorable. Another astrologer, Paul Councel, worked along similar lines, but on a different basis, giving to the phenomenon of precession of the

equinoxes an interpretation which differs fundamentally from the one accepted by modern astronomers. The practical problem is, in either case, how to

determine the geographical longitude on which the spring equinox or vernal Sun is to be projected at any specified time. Johndro placed Aries 0º' today at about 30º longitude West. Councel says that the vernal equinox was in 1932 at

longitude 35º50' West (cf. "Cosmic Causation in Geophysics," 1945). Both calculations seem to me not to conform exactly enough with the actual historical events recording the westward sweep of the main focus, or foci, of human

civilization during the last millennia — unless of course one gives to our European civilization a somewhat peculiar meaning. Here again everything depends upon one's interpretation; and provided one does not seek too

obviously to make history fit a preconceived pattern, the historical validity and significance of the parallelism is presumably the only criterion we have in determining which longitudinal belt corresponds to which zodiacal sign or constellation.

The matter cannot be discussed further here. All that I wanted to show was that, if such a theory of shifting zodiacal rulership for regions of earth longitude is correct, a man born anywhere on the globe would also find himself related to a constellation and a star by virtue of his birthplace. But as these geo-celestial relationships are shifting according to the 25,868 year cycles of civilization, what this actually means is that a man's life can be seen as occupying a definite place (thus function) in this vast precessional cycle. This is his largest "frame of reference" and his exact place in it can be determined by the longitude of his birthplace at the time of his birth. If this is understood, it can also be admitted that a man can modify his place and function in this "frame of reference" by changing his residence — which opens a very interesting field of investigation, provided one understands what is really at stake.

Moreover the place and function of an individual in the large "frame of

reference" of the 25,868 year cycle can be measured, not only by the place of his birth, but also by the generation to which he belongs. If one could be certain of the time when the precessional cycle began (a matter unfortunately

not yet settled either! ), each generation could be said to belong to a particular fraction (zodiacal degree) of this precessional cycle. For instance, if the vernal equinox is today (and approximately since 1916) located within the second degree of Pisces (which means that the Aquarian Age would begin next century) then every person born, let us say between 1844 and 1916 would "belong" to the third degree of Pisces. This degree would set his collective, over-all "human"

significance in terms of the development of civilization and of mankind in general — in so far as time-values are concerned. Then if he were born at a place "ruled" by, say, the first degree of the constellation Taurus. this fact would establish the nature of his participation in the larger cycle, as far as

space-values are concerned.

To the average person, concerned almost exclusively with his ego and his family, such a type of larger frame of reference can have but little meaning. He may be caught in a crises civilization, such as our World-Wars; but he is swept by collective forces, of which he has no consciousness and over which he has no control. It is only the individual who is a public leader, in one field or another, who can be said to deal consciously with such larger issues affecting nations and civilizations.

The astrological relationship of such a man with vast collective issues is two-fold: on the one hand, his birth-chart can be compared with the corporate chart of the group or nation in which he actively participates — and this shows the relationship between his individual life-purpose and the basic purpose of his collectivity. On the other hand, both the time and the place of his birth establish his two-fold subservience to the type of all-human, planetary (or "divine") forces which are affecting the general processes of civilization in so far as his generation and his country of birth (and, secondarily, of residence) are

concerned. Unfortunately, the exact character of this subservience can only be determined astrologically when astrologers succeed in firmly establishing the exact starting points, in time and space, of this 25,868 year cycle of precession of the equinoxes.

Mundane astrology, properly speaking, does not deal with individuals as such, but only with the relationships they have with large-scale collective issues. Too much attention, I believe, is placed upon the charts of Presidents or Prime Ministers in seeking to forecast trends in the nations whose destinies they seem to control for awhile. What matters, rather, is the relationship between the leaders and their nation's charts — or the charts of their assumption of office.

Mundane astrology, at the level of conscious action by conscious individuals, is a matter of inter-relationship between charts — thus, its extreme complexity today. And at the level of unconscious subservience to the rhythm of the march of civilization, mundane astrology refers to cycles which constitute still

uncertain frames of reference — thus, its lack of accuracy.

Mundane astrologers, in ancient times, laid great stress upon the cycle of

conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn (at 20-year intervals) and upon eclipse cycles.

Today Jupiter and Saturn are but secondary indicators of social changes in a world in which tribal and national boundaries no longer contain the tides of human interchanges; and their cycles are being superseded, in all world-wide issues, by those of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto, which subdivide approximate 500 and 1000 year cycles — the basic measures. Yet the death in office of American Presidents elected under a Jupiter-Saturn conjunction reminds us of the validity of such a cycle. Thanks to the work of Charles E. Jayne, eclipse cycles have also been given a new meaning in terms of a study of the

geographical paths traced on our globe by the shadow of total eclipse. Larger cycles are thus coming to light.

The fact that now human beings are beginning to leave, for increasingly long periods of time, the surface of our globe and even the gravitational field of the earth is posing new theoretical problems to the astrologer. We may have to devise in the future a new kind of "solar system astrology"; and I have discussed at various times (cf. World Astrology — 1944 -1945) what I consider to be a more sound approach to "heliocentric" astrology. The advocates of a "sidereal zodiac of constellations" which they claim should supersede the "tropical zodiac of signs" may also be paving the way for a significant study of the relationship of the earth to the galaxy as a whole. Our sun is but a minor star in this vast array of celestial bodies, the galaxy, which most likely is the most characteristic unit of cosmic organization; and the cycle established by the revolution of this sun around the core of the galaxy — about 400 millions of years — should some day be considered. Even today the discoveries of Professor Piccardi suggest that the ever-changing angle formed by the plane of the earth's equator and the basic plane of the lens-shaped galaxy is related to slight but significant changes in the operations of living organisms; this through the intermediary of the water contained in the body, for water seems to be most sensitive to an as-yet unknown galactic force.

Vast perspectives are indeed opening up to the human mind. Will our official science, fascinated by technological problems and refusing to accept any concept which does not fit in with the method of a rigorous and strictly intellectual approach to thinking, prove to be able always to satisfy man's

restless search for universal meaning? I, for one, doubt it. Other approaches will have to be devised, incorporating the strictly scientific methods, but also

accepting the guidance of and the data provided by other than merely intellectual faculties.

The place astrology will have in the new global civilization which we see emerging before our eyes can hardly be predicted. If it is to have a significant place, it should abandon the present-day popular aspect which commercial interests appealing to the insecurity and restlessness of modern men and women have unfortunately (but inevitably) featured. In any case we should never forget

that astrology did represent the primordial search of human beings for

measurable order and basic meaning in their collective and individual existence;

and the search is never ended.

This search is quite distinct from the urge to control our environment by technological means in order to provide maximum convenience and physical comfort to the largest possible number of human beings. The future of astrology does not rest, I believe, with its becoming some sort of statistically validated science; it depends rather on its capacity to balance and complement scientific, technological thinking by upholding a holistic search for ever more

universalistic patterns of order revealing an ever deeper and inclusive

realization of the meaning and rhythm of existence in an ever-widening world of human experience.

By permission of Leyla Rudhyar Hill Copyright © 1969 by Dane Rudhyar and Copyright © 2001 by Leyla Rudhyar Hill

All Rights Reserved.