• No results found

List of Abbreviations

Flowchart 3. 2C: Step II Process of data gathering

3.4.5.3 Implement the questionnaire

< 36

(% within QUALITY)

16 (48.5%)

0 (0%)

16 (42.1%)

≥ 36

(% within QUALITY)

17 (51.5%)

5 (100.0%)

22 (57.9%)

Total Number 33 5 38

% within QUALITY 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

P< 0.0267 (statistically significant)

TABLE 5: Other Findings (non contrast study)

Formatted: Normal

FINDINGS

Number

Percentage (%)

Tumour 11 44.0

Oedema 4 16.0

Calcifications 3 12.0

Infarction 2 8.0

Intracerebral haemorrhage 2 8.0

Bone cyst 1 4.0

Antral polyp 1 4.0

Aneurysmal clip 1 4.0

TOTAL 25 100

Figure 6: Axial source image before 3D reconstruction showing area of increased density in the left parasellar region suggestive of an aneurysm.

Figure 7: 3D MIP image showing fusiform aneurysmal dilatation of the left posterior communicating artery (arrow)

Figure 8: MIPVR image showing a normal carotid artery bifurcation and branches

Figure 9: Coronal MIP image showing a spinal AVM (arrow)

Figure 10: 3D MIP image showing encasement and compression of left carotid vessels (white arrows) due to a huge carotid body tumour.

Formatted: Line spacing: 1.5 lines

Figure 11a: Axial MIP image showing the venous phase of CTA and demonstrating the internal cerebral vein as draining vein (arrow) of a supratentorial

Arteriovenoussupratentorial Arteriovenous Malformation.

Figure 11b: Sagittal view of a Surface Shaded Display image of the same patient showing extent of the lesion and flow into the straight sinus through the great vein of Galen (arrow)

Figure 12: MIP image showing compression of right common carotid artery and jugular vein (arrow) by a thyroid mass

Figure 13: .MPVR image showing a saccular dilatation in the region of the anterior communicating artery suggestive of an aneurysm. Close examination of other views showed it to be a turn of the middle cerebral artery in profile.

Figure 14: Multi-planar volume reformatted (MPVR) image showing a right middle cerebral arteriovenous malformation

Figure 15: PA view of a 3D surface shaded display image showing tortuous network of intra-spinal vessels (arrow) in the neck of a patient with a Spinal Arteriovenous Malformation

Formatted: Line spacing: 1.5 lines

Figure 16: 3D MIP image showing an AVM (arrow) involving the posterior cerebral artery with calcifications within it.

I

P A

S

Formatted: Line spacing: 1.5 lines

Figure 17: MIP image shows saccular aneurysmal dilatation (arrow) in the region anterior communicating artery in a 56 year old woman with sudden severe headaches.

Formatted: Line spacing: 1.5 lines

Figure 18: SSD image of the same the patient patient as in (Fig. 17) with an anterior communicating

artery aneurysm.

Figure 19: Lateral view of a 3D surface shaded display image showing dilated tortuous occipital vessels in a patient with an extracranial Arteriovenous Malformation.

Formatted: Line spacing: 1.5 lines

A B

C D

Figure 20: Contrast Axial (A) and MIP images (B-D) showing an arteriovenous

malformation involving the right posterior cerebral artery. The lesion almost doubled in size following CTA study

TABLE 4: Correlation of Age with Image Quality

AGE (years)

QUALITY

Total Good Suboptimal

Formatted: Line spacing: 1.5 lines

Formatted: Tab stops: 1.04", Left

Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.5"

< 36

(% within QUALITY)

16 (48.5%)

0 (0%)

16 (42.1%)

≥ 36

(% within QUALITY)

17 (51.5%)

5 (100.0%)

22 (57.9%)

Total Number 33 5 38

% within QUALITY 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

P< 0.0267 (statistically significant)

TABLE 5: Other Findings (non contrast study)

FINDINGS

Number

Percentage (%)

Tumour 11 44.0

Oedema 4 16.0

Calcifications 3 12.0

Infarction 2 8.0

Intracerebral haemorrhage 2 8.0

Bone cyst 1 4.0

Antral polyp 1 4.0

Aneurysmal clip 1 4.0

TOTAL 25 100

DISCUSSION

One of the most undeniable advantages of CT angiography is the ability to provide all of the information which previously required two or more radiological studies which may, in the case of conventional angiography, be much more expensive and hazardous than CT.

A fundamental concept of 3D imaging of any application is that the quality and accuracy of the resulting images is limited by the quality and resolution of the dataset. In view of this, care was taken to ensure that an appropriate protocol was used for each patient.

Formatted: Centered

Formatted: Centered, Indent: Left: 0", First line: 0"

Formatted: Centered

Formatted: Centered, Indent: Left: 0", First line: 0"

The 2 poor angiograms that necessitated a repeat in this study were due to motional distortion from patient’s’ movement in response to the heat felt during contrast injection and a too long pre-scan delay (20seconds) for a patient having a Circle of Willis Angiography.

These repeated cases were later assessed as good.

Usually, CT angiography is requested when a conventional regular CT scan raises a high suspicion of a vascular disease. However, occasionally a CT angiography is requested without a prior CT scan when the referring physician suspects a vascular anomaly.

A CT n angiographic scan can provide all the details of a post contrast axial scan. In addition, the vessels are demonstrated without having to expose the patient to a second dose of radiation.

The small size of the study population may be due to the prohibitive cost of the examination.

A CT angiographic study in Ibadan costs N60, 000.00 ($450.00) which is unaffordable for most patients in a country where 70.2% of the population live on less than $1.00 per day.587 It may also have been due to the level of awareness of the availability of this non-invasive vascular imaging modality, by surgeons and physicians both within and outside the hospital.

The slight female predominancepreponderance in this study is in contrast with the male predominancepreponderance reported by Adeloye et al. 13. Also, the ratio of arteriovenous malformation to aneurysm of 2 to 1 recorded here is in contrast with 1 to 3 of the study by Adeloye et al; 13 their study may be more representative due to the longer study period (15 years) and larger study population. This study however confirms the low incidence of intracranial vascular anomaly in Nigeria as the finding of 5 intracranial AVMs and 3 cerebral aneurysms agrees with their report of an incidence of 2-3 intracranial vascular anomalies per year in Ibadan.13

The symptomatology of ruptured intracranial aneurysm and bleeding AVM is often so serious that the patient seeks medical attentionadvice to relieve distressing headache, neck stiffness, alteration in consciousness or neurological deficit. Nevertheless, some patients never make it to the hospital. The cases reported here show that the clinical picture of intracranial vascular anomalies is no different from that of similar studies in our environment and in Caucasians.11-13, 21, 45, 48

CTA is a quick and relatively safe imaging modality compared with catheter angiography and is a reliable method of establishing or ruling out vascular anomalies in suspected patients.

The images obtained are assessed based on the opacification and definition of the vessels of interest. Thirty-three (86.8%) of the patients had good quality CT angiograms. This fairly impressive result may be attributed to the use of reference guidance of other workers38, 42,

44,45,47,54 whose studies using newer image acquisition and analysis protocols have yielded impressive results, signifying that protocol optimization can lead to progressively higher quality CTA.

For single detector helical studies, a section collimation of 1mm, and a 0.5mm reconstruction interval, a pitch of 1.5, mA of ≥280, a matrix size of ≥ 512 x 512 and a field of view just enough to include areas of interest (generally 18cm) has been suggested for cerebral angiography. Similar parameters were used in this study.

The results however indicate a statistically significant (P<0.0267) correlation of the patient’s age with the image quality.

In this study, patients above 36 years of age were more likely to have suboptimal images.

This is due to a possibly reduced cardiac output in older patients and the use of identical delay time for all patients.

Delay time is another vital protocol variable, it is the selected time for contrast injection before initiating helical scan. Previous investigators have used empirical fixed injection delays ranging between 15 and 45 seconds.43

Some workers have suggested that a timing run or automatic peak opacification – sensing software should always be used.41 This is to ensure dynamic scanning during peak intraluminal contrast attenuation, minimal radiation exposure, and minimal total contrast dose.

In this study the empirical delay time was based on the reference manual of GE Medical Systems. The delay time was usually increased by a couple of seconds (usually 2-3 seconds) for patients suspected to have a poor haemodynamic status. It has been reported that the empirical delay method may result in decreased sensitivity. 598

Furthermore, an injection rate of 3.5ml/second was used in all patients (except in the 9 year old patient, where 2.5ml/second was used) to achieve a reasonablye homogenous vascular opacification, with good results.

Some workers believe that an injection rate >3.5 ml/second is not necessary in terms of the resultant opacification. Claves et al, 6059 found in phantom studies that luminal attenuation of 150HU gives optimal results – this level of enhancement is easily achieved with injection rate of 3-4ml/sec.

The scan duration of 37 to 53 seconds recorded for cerebral CTA in this study compares well with 35 to 45 seconds reported by Alberico et al.45

In the cases of carotid arterial stenosis, the three types of reconstruction techniques were used (MIP, SSD and axial) to describe the area of stenosis. The reliability of carotid stenosis measurement depends on the scanning technique.

The protocol used in this study was very similar to that of previous studies51, 52, 54-56

that have recorded impressive results. Castillo who used a 5mm collimation, a small amount of contrast material (60ml) and 3mm increment had comparatively poorer results.33

In assessing stenosis, intramural calcification was not a limiting factor,factor; axial sections were helpful in delineating the vascular lumen.

In the cerebral aneurysms detected, aneurysm al location, shape and size were demonstrated but the neck was difficult to delineate, this may have been due to positioning and aneurysmal orientation.

Preliminary data suggest that 3D-CTA also plays a favourable role in the assessment of patients with intracranial AVMs by demonstrating arterial supply, venous drainage, configuration of the nidus and relationship to surrounding structures. 47

In the present studyIn this series, the AVMs demonstrated, showed satisfactory definition of the nidus in 4(57%) patients.

The feeding arteries were delineated in all 7 (100%) and the site and extent of the lesions were demonstrated. However, only in 2 (28.6%) cases, was a draining vein identified.

Two (28.6%) of the AVMs have been confirmed by surgery.

The neurosurgeons found the CTA images adequate for surgical planning and intervention.

In the patient with a spinal AVM, surgical excision following diagnosis by CTA enabled her to ambulate with minimal effort after six months of incomplete quadriplegia.

The angiographic findings in the 38 patients evaluated showed a positive statistically significant correlation with the referring physician’s clinical impression (p<0.001).

This indicates that there is likelihood for the referring physician to be correct when he makes an impression of a vascular abnormalitynomaly in the head and neck.

Although the clinical impression may be subjective, further studies with a larger patient population may confirm this to be a true association and not a confounding variable.

No case of contrast reaction was recorded. This may be due to the use of recommended low osmolar non-ionic contrast medium.

Hypertension and atherosclerosis haves been incriminated as important factors in the aetiology of intracranial aneurysms.18 In the presenthis serie study, hypertension was not present in most patients and correlation of hypertension with intracranial vascular anomaly was not statistically significant.

Sasiadek et al 21 reported their experience with CTA in 86 patients and diagnosed 44 cases of vascular malformations (38 aneurysms and 6 AVMs). T this was not unexpected, in view of the higher incidence of intracranial vascular malformation in their population. Their report also believed that CTA may replace conventional angiography in the future. The unavailability of conventional angiography in Ibadan has made neurosurgeons to rely on CTA in patient management with notable results thus far. This study is also in agreement with many other authors 26, 43-45 who have reported the clinical usefulness of CT angiography with MIP and three-dimensional SSD rendering techniques.

SUMMARY

Between December 2003 and July 2005, thirty-eight patients with clinically suspected cranio-cervical vascular abnormalitynomaly had CT angiography using a helical CT scanner at the University College Hospital Ibadan. 20 females and 18 males whose ages ranged from 9-76 years were examined. Severe headaches, tumours and seizures were the commonest presenting features. The average scan time was 45.5 seconds. Twenty-one vascular

Formatted: Line spacing: Double

aabnormalitiesnomalies were demonstrated including seven arteriovenous malformations, three cerebral aneurysms and five carotid artery stenoses.

CONCLUSION

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Angiography is a welcomed development in CT imaging. It is not only non invasive but very precise in delineating the cranio-cervical vasculature, which otherwise would have been evaluated by catheter angiography.

Formatted: Line spacing: Double

Formatted: Left

CTA is also valuable in the pre and post surgical evaluation of intracranial vascular abnormalitiesanomalies and can serve as an important adjunct in the diagnostic armamentarium of the radiologist studying the neurovascular tree.

Though its cost is prohibitive, there is a positive statistical correlation between its findings and the clinical working diagnosis.

It is therefore recommended for patients with suspected vascular abnormalitiesanomalies of the head and neck.

REFERENCES

1. Alfred L Weber AL. History of Head and Neck Radiology: Past, Present, and Future Radiology. 2001; 218:15; 218:15-24.

2. Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, Fox SH. Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology. 2000; 215:55-62.

3. Brain S Kuszyk BS, Norman JB Jr, Fishman EK. Neurovascular applications of CT angiography. In CT angiography. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT & MR. 1998; 19: 394-403.

4. Waugh JR, Sacharia N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology.

1992; 182:243-246.

5. Hsiang JN, Liang EY, Lam JM, Zhu XL, Poon WS. The role of computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms and emergent aneurysm clipping. Neurosurgery.1996; 38:481-7.

6. Prashant GS, Jhaveri KS. Neurovascular Applications of CT Angiography. Ind J Radiol Imag. 2000; 10:23-41.

7. Mikkonen R, Kontkanen T, Kivisaari L. Acute and late adverse reactions to low-osmolar contrast media. Acta Radiol. 1995; 36 :72 –76.

8. Lenhart M, Bretschneider T, Gmeinwieser J, Ullrich OW, Schlaier J, Feuerbach S.

Cerebral CT angiography in the diagnosis of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acta Radiol. 1997; 38 :38:791 –796.

9. Velthuis BK, Rinkel GJE, Ramos LMP, Witkamp TD, Berkelbach van der Sprenkel JW, Vandertop PW, van Leeuwen MS. Subarachnoid hemorrhage: aneurysm

Formatted: Font: Italic

detection and preoperative evaluation with CT angiography. Radiology.1998; 208 :423 –430

10. Villablanca JP, Martin N, Jahan R, Gobin YP, Frazee J, Duckwiler GR, Bentson J, Hardart M, Coiteiro D, Sayre J, Vinuela F. Volume-rendered helical computerized tomography in the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2000; 93:254 –264.

11. Odeku EL. Intracranial vascular anomalies in Nigerians. J Nat. Med. Ass.

1968;60:173; 60:173-180.

12. Ohaegbulam SC. Racial bias in intracranial arterial aneurysms. Trop. Geogr.Med.

1978;30:305; 30:305-311.

13. Adeloye AA, Olumide A, Bademosi O, Kolawole TM. Intracranial vascular anomalies in Nigerians. Trop. Geogr.Med.1981;33:263-267

14. Johnson TO. Arterial blood pressures and hypertension in an urban African population sample. Br. J. Prev.Soc.Med.1971; 25:26-33.

15. Taylor GO, Agbedana EO. Comparative study of plasma High-density lipoprotein cholesterol in two groups of Nigerians of different socio-economic status. Afr J Med Sci.1983; 12:23-28.

16. Vega C, Kwoon JV, Lavine SD. Intracranial aneurysms: current evidence and clinical practice. Am Fam Physician. 2002; 66:601-8.

17. Emad S. Cerebral Aneurysm eMedcine Article Updated: September 30, 2003 18. David SL. Cerebral Aneurysms eMedcine Article Updated: August 28, 2003 19. White PM, Wardlaw JM, and Easton V. Can Noninvasive Imaging Accurately Depict

Intracranial Aneurysms? A Systematic Review. Radiology. 2000; 217: 361 - 370. Formatted: Font: Not Italic

20. Marks MP, Napel S, Jordan JE, Enzmann DR. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease:

preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography.

Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Jun; 160:1267-1271.

21. Sasiadek M, Hendrich B, Turek T, Kowalewski K, Maksymowicz H.

Our own experience with CT angiography in early diagnosis of cerebral vascular malformations. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2000; 34:48-55.

22. Norman EL, Stephen AK. Evaluation of Neuroradiology from 1904-1999.

Radiology. 2000; 217:309.

23. Housfield GH. Computerised transverse axial scanning (tomography) I. Description of system. Br. J. radiol. 1973; 46:1016-1022.

24. Fisherman EK. CT Angiography and MDCT: detection, characterisation and staging of abdominal disease. Refresher course at RSNA. 2000

25. Foley WD, Mallisee TA, Hohenwalter MD, Wilson CR Quiroz FA, Taylor AJ.

Multiphase Hepatic CT with a Multirow Detector CT Scanner. Am J Roentgenol.

2000; 175:679-685.

26. Hope JKA, Wilson JL, Thomson FJ. Three-dimensional CT angiography in the detection and characterization of intracranial berry aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol.

1996; 17:439–445.

27. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, McDonnell CH, Jeffrey RB. Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience. Radiology.

1993;186:147-152

28. Zeman RK, Davros WJ, Berman P, Weltman DI, Silverman PM, Cooper C, Evans SR, Buras RR, Stahl TJ and Nauta RJ. Three-dimensional models of the abdominal

vasculature based on helical CT: usefulness in patients with pancreatic neoplasms.

Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:1425; 162:1425-1429.

29. Fishman EK, Wyatt SH, Ney DR, Kuhlman JE, Siegelman SS. Spiral CT of the pancreas with multiplanar display. Am J Roentgenol.1992;159:1209; 159:1209-1215.

30. Fishman EK, Drebin RA, Magid D, William WS, Derek RN, Andrew FB, Lee HR, James AS, Elias AZ, Stanley SS. Volumetric rendering techniques: Applications for three-dimensional imaging of the hip. Radiology. 1987; 163:737-738.

31. Harbaugh RE, Schlusselberg DS, Jeffery R, Hayden S, Cromwell LD, Pluta D, English RA. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography in the preoperative evaluation of cerebrovascular lesions. Neurosurgery. 1995; 36:320-6.

32. Dorsch NWC, Young N, Kingston RJ, Compton JS. Early experience with spiral CT in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1995; 36:230–238.

33. Castillo M. Diagnosis of disease of the common carotid artery bifurcation: CT angiography vs. catheter angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 161:395–398.

34. Wu Jinsong, Chen Xiancheng, Shi Yuquan, Chen Shuang. Non-invasive three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography in preoperative detection of intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Chin Med J. 2000; 113:915-920.

35. Marks MP, Napel S, Jordan JE, Enzmann DR. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease:

preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography.

Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 160:1267-1271.

36. Link J, Brossmann J, Penselin V, Gluer CC, Heller M. Common carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary results of CT angiography and color-coded duplex sonography compared with digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;

168:361–365.

37. Pryor JC, Setton A, Nelson PK, Berenstein A. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography and tips on avoidance. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1996; 6:751–757.

38. Inagawa T. Ultra early rebleeding within six hours after aneurysmal rupture. Surg.

Neurol. 1994; 42: 130-134.

39. Brown JH, Lustrin ES, Lev MH, Egilvy CS, Taveras JM. Characterisation of intracranial aneurysms using CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 169:889-893.

40. Zouaoui A, Sahel M, Marro B, Clemenceau S, Dargent N, Bitar A, Faillot T, Capelle L, Marsault C. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography in detection of cerebral aneurysms in acute sub-arachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 125-130.

41. Anderson GB, Findlay JM, Steinke DE, Ashforth R. Experience with computed tomographic angiography for the detection of intracranial aneurysms in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1997; 41: 522-528.

42. Vieco PT. CT angiography of the carotid artery. CT in Neuroimaging Revisited.

Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1998; 8: 593-605.

43. Schwartz RB, Tice HM, Hooten HM, Hsu RTL, Stieg PE. Evaluation of cerebral aneurysm with helical CT: Correlation with conventional angiography and MR angiography. Radiology. 1994; 192: 717-722.

44. Liang EY, Chan M, Hsiang JHK, Walkden SB, Poon WS, Lam WWM, Metreweli C.

Detection and assessment of intracranial aneurysms. Value of CT angiography with shaded surface display. Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 165:1497–1502.

45. Alberico RA, Patel M, Casey SO, Jacobs B, Maguire W, Decker R. Evaluation of the circle of Willis with three-dimensional CT angiography in patients with suspected intracranial aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol.1995; 16: 1571-1578.

46. Wilms G, Guffen M, Gryspeevolt S. Spiral CT of intracranial aneurysms: Correlation with digital subtraction and magnetic resonance angiography. Neuroradiology. 1996;

38: 520-525.

47. Barboriah DP, Pravenzale JM. MR arteriography of intracranial circulation Am J Roentgenol... 1998; 171: 1489-1478.

48. Rieger J, Hosten N, Neumann K, Langer R, Molsen P, Lanksch WR, Pfeifer KJ, Felix R. Initial clinical experience with spiral CT and 3D arterial reconstruction in intracranial aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 1996;38:245; 38:245-251.

49. Núñez DB, Torres-León M, Múnera F. Vascular Injuries of the Neck and Thoracic Inlet: Helical CT–Angiographic Correlation. RadioGraphics. 2004;24:1087; 24:1087-1098.

50. Hodge CJ, Leeson M, Cacayorin E, Petro G, Culebras A, Iliya A. Computed tomographic evaluation of extracranial carotid artery disease. Neurosurgery. 1987;

21:167–176.

51. Link J, Mueller-Huelsbeck S, Brossmann J, Grabener M, Stock U, Heller M.

Prospective assessment of carotid bifurcation disease with spiral CT angiography in surface shaded display (SSD)-technique. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1995; 19:451–

456.

52. Link J, Brossmann J, Grabener M, Mueller-Huelsbeck S, Steffens JC, Brinkmann G, Heller M. Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 1996; 17:89–94.