• No results found

Namibia – Interview of Prof dr Jan-­‐Bart Gewald 134

 

Interview  of  Prof.  dr.  Jan-­‐Bart  GEWALD,  Leiden  University  Institute  for  History.   Interview  was  conducted  in  person  in  Leiden,  the  Netherlands,  on  12.11.2015.  

Different  levels,  national,  regional  and  international,  seems  to  be  very  interwoven  in  the  Namibia´s   independence  struggle.  How  much  was  it  about  the  Cold  War  dynamics?    

The   crucial   defeat   of   the   SADF   happened   already   in   1988,   in   the   battle   of   the   Cuito   Guinavale,   so  

before   the   end   of   the   Cold   War.   South   Africa´s   war   in   Angola   had   become   increasing   economical  

burden,  and  the  defeat  was  the  crucial  moment  when  the  raising  cost  of  war  reached  its  limits.  The   whole   war   was   bad   for   SA´s   economical   interests.   Already   in   1985   South   Africa   had   declared   the   ´state  of  emergency´,  and  had  deployed  the  army  in  Angola  and  Namibian  territory,  overstretching  its   capabilities.   Also   the   economical   sanctions   against   the   South   Africa   where   hurting   its   economy.   Therefore   the   final   process   for   Namibia´s   independence   was   finally   able   to   start   in   1989.   Nelson   Mandela,  on  his  speech  made  during  his  visit  to  Cuba  in  1991,  also  referred  to  SADF´s  defeat  in  Cuito   Cuanavale  as  a  crucial  moment  for  Namibia´s  independence409.    

Which  other  events  you  see  having  crucial  impact  to  the  SWAPO´s  independence  struggle  dynamics?   The  1978  battle  of  Cassinga,  as  part  of  SADF´s  ´Operation  Reindeer´,  which  was  a  South  African  air   force  attack  against  the  SWAPO´s  refugee  camp  in  Cassinga  [southern  Angola],  resulting  a  massacre   of   hundreds   of   civilians,   mostly   women   and   children,   which   started   a   new   phase   of   the   conflict.   SWAPO  retaliated  heavily  against  SADF´s  bases  and  international  opinion  turned  more  against  South   Africa.    

This  was  preceded  by  the  1977  murder  of  the  South  Africa´s  Prime  Minister,  who  was  succeeded  by   P.W.  Botha  in  1978.  As  an  ex-­‐defence  minister,  he  started  a  new,  violent  approach  towards  SWAPO.     What   were   the   relations   between   SWAPO   and   ANC?   They   were   fighting   against   the   same   government,  but  did  they  co-­‐operate?    

No.  As  SWAPO´s  members  were  mostly  not  educated  and  ANC´s  were,  there  seems  to  be  a  ´cultural   division´  between  these  organizations  and  no  natural  communication.  SWAPO  was  much  closer  with   other   regional   liberation   movements,   namely   Zimbabwe’s   ZANU   (Mugabe)   and   with   Zambia’s   government,  where  SWAPO´s  troops  moved  to  Angola  in  1974.          

Are  there  any  statistics  of  the  level  of  violence  and  casualties  of  SWAPO´s  armed  struggle?  I  have   seen  a  figure  of  1  million  casualties  mentioned  in  the  literature.    

No.   The   existence   of   statistics   requires   naturally   that   some   entity   would   systematically   collect   the   information,   and   in   this   case,   South   Africa   did   not   do   so.   I   would   say   that   1   million   casualties   is   a   modest  estimation  of  what  SADF´s  operations  caused  in  whole  South  Africa.  

                                                                                                                         

409The  exact  quotation  from  Mandela´s  speech  in  Cuba  on  38th  anniversary  of  the  start  of  the  Cuban  revolution  

Date,  July  26,  1991:  ”The  defeat  of  the  racist  army  allowed  the  struggling  people  of  Namibia  to  finally  win  their   independence.”  Transcript  retrieved  from:  http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs3733.html,  (1.12.2015).    

 

What   is   your   opinion   of   SWAPO´s   role   in   the   Namibia´s   liberation   struggle?   Some   sources   (SWAPO´s)  emphasize  the  importance  and  Westerns  researchers  emphasize  more  of  regional  and   international  factors.    

Referring  to  Sam  Nujoma´s  [SWAPO´s  leader,  later  Namibia´s  president]  ´memoirs´  published  in  2001,   I   would   call   it   propaganda.   The   book,   which   obviously   had   several   ghost-­‐writers,   glorifies   the   SWAPO´s  armed  resistance  and  dismisses  external  factors.    

                                         

Appendix II: Namibia – Interview of Lalli Metsola  

Interview  of  Lalli  METSOLA,  researcher,  University  of  Helsinki,  Department  of  Political  and  Economic   Studies,  Development  Studies.    

Interview  was  conducted  via  Skype  on  20.11.2015   (Translated  from  Finnish  by  the  author)  

What   were   the   relations   between   SWAPO   and   ANC?   They   were   fighting   against   the   same   government,  but  did  they  co-­‐operate?    

SWAPO  was  more  of  a  nationalistic  liberation  movement  and  had  more  co-­‐operation  and  contacts   with   Angolan   and   Tanzanian   movements,   then   with   ANC,   in   which   the   South   African   Communist   Party  had  acquire  increasing  influence.  Both  organizations  had  co-­‐operation  with  Soviet  Union.  But   they  had  different  culture,  due  their  different  backgrounds.  SWAPO´s  leadership  had  to  run  into  exile   abroad,  received  their  education  through  the  ´life´s  experience´.    

What  kind  of  impact  did  the  SWAPO´s  division  to  its  external  [exile]  and  internal  fractions  had  to   SWAPO´s  resistance  and  to  the  process  in  whole?    

It  was  the  SWAPO´s  leadership  in  exile  who  organized  the  armed  resistance,  but  from  Angola,  from   where   since   1974   SWAPO/PLAN   guerrillas   were   infiltrated   to   Namibia.   SWAPO   had   moved   there   from  Zambia.  SWAPO´s  ´old  guard´  remained  in  Namibia.  Actually  many  of  them  had  received  their   education  in  Finnish  missionary  schools  in  Ovamboland  [northern  part  of  Namibia  bordering  Angola].     SWAPO´s   exile   leadership´s   importance   and   role   can   be   seen   also   after   the   independence,   as   it     formed  the  leadership  of  the  newly  independent  Namibia.  This  can  be  seen  partly  because  SWAPO´s   internal   leadership´s   position   inside   the   country   was   extremely   difficult,   because   of   the   constant   persecution   by   South   Africans,   as   they   were   either   convicted   to   prison   or   forced   into   exile,   preventing  the  consolidation  of  their  action  or  personal  role/reputation.      

How  important  at  the  end  was  SWAPO´s  armed  struggle  in  gaining  the  independence?    

SWAPO´s  own  armed  action  had  modest  impact  to  the  final  independence.  Angola´s  and  Cuba´s  roles   were  crucial.  SWAPO´s  armed  resistance  had  more  of  a  symbolic  meaning,  which  its  leadership  has   used   ever   since   for   its   own   political   gains.   When   evaluating   SWAPO´s   military   action   in   northern   Namibia,  it  was  never  able  to  create  freed  areas  there.    

On   the   other   hand,   SWAPO   had   special   acknowledgement   by   the   United   Nations   as   the   ´sole   and   authentic   representative   of   Namibian   people´,   giving   it   a   unique   position.   Therefore   its   diplomatic   action  became  important.    

How  much  and  in  which  ways  Namibia´s  independence  struggle  was  about  regional  dynamics?   South   African   administration   had   no   wish   to   change   regional   power   politics.   Therefore   SA   emphasized   its   joining   the   US   Reagans   administration´s   fight   against   communism   in   the   1980´s.   It   was   the   Western   Contact   Group,   which   started   to   negotiate   the   implementation   of   the   UNSC   resolution  for  Namibia´s  independence.  SWAPO  was  not  included  in  these  negotiations.  It  was  finally