• No results found

O did not adsorb on Pt(331) at room temperature.

Brucker and Rhodin [82] have suggested that the 4o In separation is an indication of the degree of C-O bond weakening The 4eV separation obtained in this

N 2 O did not adsorb on Pt(331) at room temperature.

Weak adsorption on P t ( l l l ) at 78K was observed by Avery [90], Thermal desorption spectra revealed N2O peaks at 9 IK at 0 = 0.02L increasing to 97K at 0 = 0.2L (saturation o f the monolayer). No residual adsorbed oxygen was detected in the EELS spectra after desorption indicating that decomposition to N2 and 0(a) does not occur. A shift in the v(N N ) mode by 80cm’’ strongly suggests that bonding occurs through the nitrogen end o f the molecule. N2O forms a donor bond with either its

2n

or 7 a orbital with little or no back donation into the unoccupied antibonding

3n

orbital which makes adsorption weaker than CO or NO.

Umbach and Menzel [91] concluded from UPS data that N2O adsorbed on clean Ru(OOl) bonds through the 7 a orbital which moves to higher binding energies and overlaps the

In

orbital at lO.BeV below Ef. No peak at this value was seen in this work but the broad peak between 5.5 and 8.4eV may be the

2n

orbital which appeared at 5.9eV in the Ru(OOl) spectrum.

5.2.4 Nitric Oxide and Carbon Monoxide Co-adsorption on Platinum

N itric o x id e did not react w ith carbon m o n o x id e on P t(3 3 1 ) accord in g to the eq u ation ;

NO(a) + CO(a) N2(g) + C02(g)

+

02(g)

+

N20(g)

(1)

as w as ob serv ed on P t ( l l l ) and P t( llO ) by L am bert and C om rie [28]. T his is not surprising, h o w ev er, in light o f the fact that N O adsorption and desorption is m olecu la r on P t(3 3 1 ) w hereas sig n ifica n t d eco m p o sitio n o f (3-NO occurred on the (1 1 1 ) and (1 1 0 ) su rfaces p rovidin g N(a) and 0(a) for reaction. T h ese authors also o b served that large C O ex p o su res w ere m ore e ffe c tiv e at su p p ressin g reaction (1) than large N O ex p o su res d esp ite com parable stick in g p rob ab ilities and their results s u g g ested this w as by a m ech an ism other than sim p ly d en y in g adsorption sites to N O . Further in v e stig a tio n s in w h ich the surface w as d o sed w ith (3-NO o n ly fo llo w e d by C O rev ealed tw o concurrent p ro cesses w ere taking p lace - (i) C O cau sed the transform ation (3-NO to a -N O and (ii) it also d isp la ced (3-NO from the surface with co n sid era b le e ffic ie n c y . CO had n o e ffe c t on a -N O . T h e transform ation reaction w a s ob serv ed in this w ork w here step -site N O (Tp = 4 4 3 K ) w a s con v erted to terrace site N O (Tp = 3 70 K ). T h e d isp lacem en t o f N O by C O m ay be a co n seq u en ce o f their electro n ic structures. W ork fu n ction m easurem en ts reveal that N O tends to donate electron s to the m etal thereby in creasin g the ch arge d en sity in the surrounding sites. T h e se sites w ou ld b e en erg etica lly favourable to adsorb in g C O m o le c u le s w h ich tend to abstract electron s from the m etal. Lam bert and C om rie su g g est (3-NO to a -N O m ay in v o lv e som eth in g lik e a bridge bond ed N O b eco m in g a linear N O due to the adsorption o f C O on a n eigh b ou rin g site but th ey had no direct e v id e n c e to support this.

T h e CO results o f fig . 5 .1 3 are prelim inary in nature. W h ile th ey sh o w a d efin ite d ecrease in the ratio o f the terrace to step peak in ten sities it has not been esta b lish ed w hether this is due to a d ecrease in the terrace site peak inten sity, an in crease in the step site peak in ten sity or a com b in atio n o f the tw o. C O2 is a very

5.3

CONCLUSIONS

B oth C O and N O adsorb and desorb m o lecu la rly on P t(3 3 1 ). Initial adsorption is on to the step sites w here the m o le c u le s are m ore strongly bound. Therm al desorp tion occurs as tw o p h ases - a lo w tem perature terrace peak and a higher tem perature step peak. T he tem perature o f the peak m axim a d ecrease as co vera g e in creases ind icatin g a d ecrease in the activation en erg y o f desorption.

A n a ly ses o f the area under the peaks reveal that at saturation 57% o f CO is adsorbed on the terraces w h ereas 57% o f N O is adsorbed on the steps. T he CO surface con centration is 1.5 tim es greater on the steps than on the terraces. W ith N O this valu e increases to 2.6.

A R U P S exp erim en ts reveal a 0 .4 e V shift in the bin d ing en er g ie s o f the 4 a , 5 o and Iti orbitals o f C O on g o in g from a saturated su rface to a su rface com p risin g o n ly step site CO.

N2O and O2 do not adsorb on P t(3 3 1 ) at room tem perature.

C o-ad sorp tion o f step site N O w ith C O on P t(3 3 1 ) d o es not result in any sig n ific a n t am ounts o f ch em ical reaction products. H o w ev er, a transform ation reaction is o b served in w h ich the p resen ce o f the C O ca u ses a d ecrease in the N O desorp tion tem perature from 4 4 3 to 3 70 K . T h is su g g ests CO is adsorbing onto the step sites and cau sin g N O to m o v e to the terraces. T h e inten sity o f the N O peak d oes not decrease.

CHAPTER SIX