• No results found

3. The limit does not exist since canceling, we have limπ‘₯β†’0

4. Factoring the numerator and simplifying, we get π‘₯2βˆ’ 3π‘₯

5. Factoring the numerator and the denominator, we obtain 𝑑4+ 𝑑2 6. Factoring the numerator, we obtain

π‘₯3βˆ’ 3π‘₯

7. Factoring the denominator and simplifying, we get 8. Factoring the numerator and simplifying, we get

𝑦2βˆ’ 5𝑦 + 4

9. Factoring the numerator and denominator and simplifying, we get π‘₯2+ 2π‘₯ βˆ’ 3

10. Factoring the numerator and denominator and simplifying, we get 2𝑑2+ 3𝑑 βˆ’ 2

11. Factoring the numerator and the denominator and simplifying, we get π‘₯2βˆ’ 9 12. Factoring the numerator and the denominator, we obtain

2𝑦2+ 𝑦 βˆ’ 1 13. Expanding the numerator, we get

(3 + β„Ž)2βˆ’ 9 = 9 + 6β„Ž + β„Ž2βˆ’ 9 = 6β„Ž + β„Ž2. Next, factoring and simplifying, we get

(3 + β„Ž)2βˆ’ 9

14. Simplifying and factoring the numerator and the denominator, we obtain 15. Factoring the numerator and the denominator, we obtain

5π‘₯2βˆ’ 15 18. Rewriting the numerator as a single quotient, we have

1

19. Rewriting the numerator as a single quotient we get 1

20. There are two ways to do this. One way is to multiply the numerator and denominator by√

21. There are two ways to do this. One way is to multiply the numerator and denominator by√

9 + β„Ž + 3 and then simplify:

22. There are two ways to do this. First, factoring the numerator and simplifying, we get 4π‘₯βˆ’ 1

23. Expanding the numerator, we get

(1 + β„Ž)4βˆ’ 1 = 1 + 4β„Ž + 6β„Ž2+ 4β„Ž3+ β„Ž4βˆ’ 1.

Next, factoring and simplifying, we get (1 + β„Ž)4βˆ’ 1

(b) Rationalizing the denominator, we have limπ‘₯β†’3

27. Dividing both numerator and denominator by 𝑧3, we get

π‘§β†’βˆžlim

28. Dividing both numerator and denominator by π‘₯2, we get

π‘₯β†’βˆžlim

29. Dividing both numerator and denominator by 𝑒𝑑, we get

35. First we use algebra: Multiply by(√

4 + β„Ž + 2)

in numerator and denominator, then expand and simplify:

√4 + β„Ž βˆ’ 2 = Now we can find the limit:

limβ„Žβ†’0

36. First we combine the fractions:

√ 1

in numerator and denominator, then expand and simplify:

(2 βˆ’βˆš Now we find the limit:

limβ„Žβ†’0

37. Given that βˆ’4π‘₯ + 6 ≀ 𝑓(π‘₯) ≀ π‘₯2βˆ’ 2π‘₯ + 7, we see that

(using the sum property since each limit exists) 4 βˆ’ 0 ≀ lim

40. Because the denominator equals 0 when π‘₯ = 4, so must the numerator. This means π‘˜2= 16 and the choices for π‘˜ are 4 or

βˆ’4.

41. Because the denominator equals 0 when π‘₯ = 1, so must the numerator. So 1 βˆ’ π‘˜ + 4 = 0. The only possible value of π‘˜ is 5.

42. Because the denominator equals 0 when π‘₯ = βˆ’2, so must the numerator. So 4 βˆ’ 8 + π‘˜ = 0 and the only possible value of π‘˜ is 4.

43. Because the denominator equals 0 when π‘₯ = 5, so must the numerator. So 25 βˆ’ 5π‘˜ + 5 = 0 and the only possible value of π‘˜ is 6.

44. Because the denominator equals 0 when π‘₯ = 0, so must the numerator. So π‘’π‘˜βˆ’ 8 = 0 and the only possible value of π‘˜ is ln 8.

45. Because the denominator equals 0 when π‘₯ = 1, so must the numerator. So π‘˜2βˆ’ 49 = 0 and the choices for π‘˜ are 7 or βˆ’7.

46. Division of numerator and denominator by π‘₯2yields π‘₯2+ 3π‘₯ + 5

4π‘₯ + 1 + π‘₯π‘˜ = 1 + 3βˆ•π‘₯ + 5βˆ•π‘₯2 4βˆ•π‘₯ + 1βˆ•π‘₯2+ π‘₯π‘˜βˆ’2.

Asπ‘₯ β†’ ∞, the limit of the numerator is 1. The limit of the denominator depends upon π‘˜. If π‘˜ > 2, the denominator approaches ∞ asπ‘₯ β†’ ∞, so the limit of the quotient is 0. If π‘˜ = 2, the denominator approaches 1 as π‘₯ β†’ ∞, so the limit of the quotient is 1. Ifπ‘˜ < 2 the denominator approaches 0+asπ‘₯ β†’ ∞, so the limit of the quotient is ∞. Therefore the values ofπ‘˜ we are looking for are π‘˜ β‰₯ 2.

47. For the numerator, lim

48. Division of numerator and denominator by π‘₯3yields π‘₯3βˆ’ 6

π‘₯π‘˜+ 3= 1 βˆ’ 6βˆ•π‘₯3 π‘₯π‘˜βˆ’3+ 3βˆ•π‘₯3.

Asπ‘₯ β†’ ∞, the limit of the numerator is 1. The limit of the denominator depends upon π‘˜. If π‘˜ > 3, the denominator approaches ∞ asπ‘₯ β†’ ∞, so the limit of the quotient is 0. If π‘˜ = 3, the denominator approaches 1 as π‘₯ β†’ ∞, so the limit of the quotient is 1. Ifπ‘˜ < 3 the denominator approaches 0+asπ‘₯ β†’ ∞, so the limit of the quotient is ∞. Therefore the values ofπ‘˜ we are looking for are π‘˜ β‰₯ 3.

49. We divide both the numerator and denominator by 𝑒5π‘₯, giving

π‘₯β†’βˆžlim

50. We divide both the numerator and denominator by 32π‘₯, giving

π‘₯β†’βˆžlim so the quotient has a limit of ∞.

51. In the denominator, we have lim

π‘₯β†’βˆ’βˆž32π‘₯+ 4 = 4. In the numerator, if π‘˜ < 0, we have lim

π‘₯β†’βˆ’βˆž3π‘˜π‘₯+ 6 = ∞, so the quotient has a limit of ∞. Ifπ‘˜ = 0, we have lim

π‘₯β†’βˆ’βˆž3π‘˜π‘₯+ 6 = 7, so the quotient has a limit of 7βˆ•4. If π‘˜ > 0, we have lim

π‘₯β†’βˆ’βˆž3π‘˜π‘₯+ 6 = 6, so the quotient has a limit of 6βˆ•4.

52. Let 𝑑 =√

54. Let 𝑑 =√

Thus, lim

66. There are many possible correct answers.

67. There are many possible choices for 𝑔(π‘₯). One possibility is 𝑔(π‘₯) =( π‘₯ βˆ’ 3

Observe that𝑓(π‘₯) = 𝑔(π‘₯) wherever 𝑓(π‘₯) is defined except for π‘₯ = 3 since 𝑔(3) is undefined. This means the graphs of 𝑓(π‘₯) and 𝑔(π‘₯) will be the same except at π‘₯ = 3 where the graph of 𝑔(π‘₯) has a hole.

Since the graphs of𝑓(π‘₯) and 𝑔(π‘₯) are identical except at π‘₯ = 3, the hole will have the same coordinates as the function 𝑓(π‘₯) at π‘₯ = 3, so the coordinates of the hole will be (3, 10).

68. There are many possible choices for 𝑔(π‘₯). One possibility is 𝑔(π‘₯) =( π‘₯

Observe that𝑓(π‘₯) = 𝑔(π‘₯) wherever 𝑓(π‘₯) is defined except for π‘₯ = 0 since 𝑔(0) is undefined. This means the graphs of 𝑓(π‘₯) and 𝑔(π‘₯) will be the same except at π‘₯ = 0 where the graph of 𝑔(π‘₯) has a hole.

Since the graphs of𝑓(π‘₯) and 𝑔(π‘₯) are identical except at π‘₯ = 0, the hole will have the same coordinates as the function 𝑓(π‘₯) at π‘₯ = 0, so the coordinates of the hole will be (0, 1).

69. There are many possible choices for 𝑔(π‘₯). One possibility is 𝑔(π‘₯) =( π‘₯ βˆ’ 1

Observe that𝑓(π‘₯) = 𝑔(π‘₯) wherever 𝑓(π‘₯) is defined except for π‘₯ = 1 since 𝑔(1) is undefined. This means the graphs of 𝑓(π‘₯) and 𝑔(π‘₯) will be the same except at π‘₯ = 1 where the graph of 𝑔(π‘₯) has a hole.

Since the graphs of𝑓(π‘₯) and 𝑔(π‘₯) are identical except at π‘₯ = 1, the hole will have the same coordinates as the function 𝑓(π‘₯) at π‘₯ = 1, so the coordinates of the hole will be (1, 0).

70. There are many possible choices for 𝑔(π‘₯). One possibility is 𝑔(π‘₯) =( π‘₯ βˆ’ πœ‹

Observe that𝑓(π‘₯) = 𝑔(π‘₯) wherever 𝑓(π‘₯) is defined except for π‘₯ = πœ‹ since 𝑔(πœ‹) is undefined. This means the graphs of 𝑓(π‘₯) and 𝑔(π‘₯) will be the same except at π‘₯ = πœ‹ where the graph of 𝑔(π‘₯) has a hole.

Since the graphs of𝑓(π‘₯) and 𝑔(π‘₯) are identical except at π‘₯ = πœ‹, the hole will have the same coordinates as the function 𝑓(π‘₯) at π‘₯ = πœ‹, so the coordinates of the hole will be (πœ‹, 0).

73. We have In both cases𝐿 = 0. The Squeeze Theorem cannot be applied to other cases since for any other 𝑐,

limπ‘₯β†’π‘βˆ’ 1

78. If we factor the numerator of 𝑓 and simplify, we see that

𝑓(π‘₯) = π‘₯ βˆ’ 1, for π‘₯ β‰  βˆ’1.

This show that the two functions are identical (that is, have the same values) where they are both defined, the functions have different domains:π‘₯ = βˆ’1 is in the domain of 𝑔 but not in the domain of 𝑓.

79. The limit lim

π‘₯β†’1𝑓(π‘₯)βˆ•π‘”(π‘₯) depends on the values of 𝑓(π‘₯)βˆ•π‘”(π‘₯) as π‘₯ approaches 1 but is not necessarily dependent on the value atπ‘₯ = 1. For example, we can take 𝑔(π‘₯) = 1 and

80. False, since the limit lim

π‘₯β†’0𝑓(π‘₯) may not even exist. For example if 𝑏(π‘₯) = βˆ’1, π‘Ž(π‘₯) = 1 and 𝑓(π‘₯) = sin(1βˆ•π‘₯), then the conditions are met but sin(1βˆ•π‘₯) has no limit as π‘₯ β†’ 0.

81. True, by the Squeeze Theorem, using the constant function 𝑏(π‘₯) = 0.

82. False, this is a confused, and incorrect, version of the Squeeze Theorem. For example if 𝑏(π‘₯) = 𝑓(π‘₯) = π‘₯, and π‘Ž(π‘₯) = 1 then the conditions are met but lim

π‘₯β†’0𝑓(π‘₯) = 0 and lim

𝑔(π‘₯) does not exist, since lim

π‘₯β†’0+

86. True, this follows from the multiplicative limit property: if lim

π‘₯β†’0π‘Ž(π‘₯) exists and lim

(b) No for𝛿 = 0.75. The graph of 𝑓(π‘₯) on the interval 2.25 < π‘₯ < 3.75 extends outside the shaded region.

(c) Yes for𝛿 = 0.5. The graph of 𝑓(π‘₯) on the interval 2.5 < π‘₯ < 3.5 fits inside the shaded region.

(d) Yes for𝛿 = 0.25. The graph of 𝑓(π‘₯) on the interval 2.75 < π‘₯ < 3.25 fits inside the shaded region.

(e) Yes for𝛿 = 0.1. The graph of 𝑓(π‘₯) on the interval 2.9 < π‘₯ < 3.1 fits inside the shaded region.

2. For each 𝛿 we determine whether the graph of 𝑔(π‘₯) on the interval 20 βˆ’ 𝛿 < π‘₯ < 20 + 𝛿 stays in the shaded region 𝐿 βˆ’ πœ– < 𝑦 < 𝐿 + πœ– in the figure. Notice that as 𝛿 gets smaller, the interval gets shorter.

(a) No for𝛿 = 0.5. The graph of 𝑔(π‘₯) on the interval 19.5 < π‘₯ < 20.5 extends outside the shaded region.

(b) No for𝛿 = 0.4. The graph of 𝑔π‘₯) on the interval 19.6 < π‘₯ < 20.4 extends outside the shaded region.

(c) No for𝛿 = 0.3. The graph of 𝑔(π‘₯) on the interval 19.7 < π‘₯ < 20.3 extends outside the shaded region.

(d) Yes for𝛿 = 0.2. The graph of 𝑔(π‘₯) on the interval 19.8 < π‘₯ < 20.2 fits inside the shaded region.

(e) Yes for𝛿 = 0.1. The graph of 𝑔(π‘₯) on the interval 19.9 < π‘₯ < 20.1 fits inside the shaded region.

3. By tracing on a calculator or solving equations, we find the following values of 𝛿:

Forπœ– = 0.2, 𝛿 ≀ 0.1.

4. By tracing on a calculator or solving equations, we find the following values of 𝛿:

Forπœ– = 0.1, 𝛿 ≀ 0.46.

Related documents