• No results found

Table 2B Appraisal checklist of articles using focus groups, in-depth interviews or mixed methods ◊

In document 2670.pdf (Page 40-43)

D un ca n Fo reman H od ge K ho srov an i Warr en

1. Interviewer/facilitator: Which author/s conducted the interview or focus

group?

-

2. Gender: Was the researcher male or female?

-

-

-

3. Interviewer characteristics: What characteristics were reported about

the interviewer/facilitator?

-

-

-

-

4. Methodological orientation and theory: Did the researchers clarify the

framework they used to explore research questions and aims?

5. Sampling: How were participants selected? e.g. purposive,

convenience, consecutive, snowball

-

6. Method of approach: How were participants approached? e.g. face-to-

face, telephone, mail, email

-

-

-

7. Sample size: How many participants were in the study?

8. Setting of data interview or focus group? e.g. home, clinic, workplace

-

-

-

9. Description of sample: What are the important characteristics of the

sample? e.g. demographic data, date

-

-

10. Interview guide/survey: Were questions, prompts, guides provided by

the authors? Was it pilot tested?

-

11. Audio/visual recording: Did the research use audio or visual recording

to collect the data?

-

-

12. Duration: What was the duration of the interviews or focus group?

-

-

13. Number of data coders and description of coding tree: How many data

coders coded the data? Did authors provide a description of the coding

tree?

-

-

-

14. Derivation of themes: Were themes identified in advance or derived

from the data?

-

15. Software: What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data?

-

16. Are any contradictory data taken into account or noted?

-

-

-

-

-

17. Quotations presented: Were participant quotations presented to

illustrate the themes / findings? Was each quotation identified?

18. Data and findings consistent: Was there consistency between the data

presented and the findings?

19. Clarity of major themes: Were major themes clearly presented in the

findings?

20. Clarity of minor themes: Is there a description of diverse cases or

discussion of minor themes?

-

-

-

21. Does the researcher discuss the contribution the study makes to

existing knowledge or understanding?

22. Does the research discuss new areas of research needed?

-

23. Does the research acknowledge and address study limitations and

potential for bias?

-

-

-

24. Method of assessing internal validity

-

Articles could receive one of three scores for each item: - (dash): denotes that the article does not address the item

○ (hollow circle): denotes that the articles address the item incompletely

● (full circle): denotes that the article addresses the item completely

Score 10/22 17/22 11.5/24 15/24 15.5/22

Percentage

(%) 45.5 77.3 47.9 62.5 70.5

These articles utilized mixed methods of survey data and interviews. Two additional items (15, 24) were added as a method of assessing survey data specifically. Other articles appearing in this table were not judged on the additional items. This is reflected in the maximum number of points in the scoring section.

A-xv

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recommendations for HIV testing

services for inpatients and outpatients in acute-care hospital settings. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1993 Mar 5; 42(8):157-8.

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Revised guidelines for HIV counseling, testing, and referral. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001 Nov 9; 50(RR-19):1, 57; quiz CE1-19a1-CE6-19a1. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). HIV testing among racial/ethnic

minorities--united states, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001 Nov 30; 50(47):1054-8. 4. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec; 19(6):349-57.

5. Adepoju JA, Watkins MP, Richardson A. A survey of a HBCU's senior year nursing students' perception of the HIV/AIDS phenomenon: A follow-up study. Journal of National Black Nurses' Association: JNBNA. 2009; 20(2):38.

6. Taylor SE, Jones T. African American college students' attitudes toward HIV/AIDS:

Implications for historically black colleges and universities. Challenge: A Journal of Research on African American Men. 2007; 13(2):1-12.

7. Braithwaite K, Thomas V. HIV/AIDS knowledge, attitudes, and risk-behaviors among African- American and Caribbean college women. International Journal for the Advancement of

Counseling. 2001; 23(2):115-29.

8. Davis C, Sloan M, MacMaster S, Kilbourne B. HIV/AIDS knowledge and sexual activity: An examination of racial differences in a college sample. Health Soc Work. 2007 Aug; 32(3):211-8. 9. Sutton MY, Hardnett FP, Wright P, Wahi S, Pathak S, Warren-Jeanpiere L, et al. HIV/AIDS knowledge scores and perceptions of risk among African American students attending

historically black colleges and universities. Public health reports (Washington, D.C.: 1974). 2011; 126(5):653-63.

10. Adefuye AS, Abiona TC, Balogun JA, Lukobo-Durrell M. HIV sexual risk behaviors and perception of risk among college students: Implications for planning interventions. BMC Public Health. 2009 Aug 4; 9:281, 2458-9-281.

11. Lewis JE, Malow RM, Ireland SJ. HIV/AIDS risk in heterosexual college students. A review of a decade of literature. J Am Coll Health. 1997; 45(4):147-58.

12. MacDonald NE, Wells GA, Fisher WA,et al. High-risk STD/HIV behavior among college students. JAMA. 1990 June 20; 263(23):3155-9.

13. Brandon DP, Smith CM, Sistani N, Grigsby J, Young A, Tibbs E. HIV/AIDS and screening efficacy of African American students. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal. 2010; 39(1):18-30.

A-xvi

14. Khosrovani M, Desai M, Sanders A. African American college students’ opinions of media messages on HIV/AIDS awareness: Students' attitudes toward the disease. College Student Journal. 2011; 45(2):414.

15. Warren-Jeanpiere L, Sutton M, Jones S. Historically black colleges and universities' campus culture and HIV prevention attitudes and perceptions among students. Journal of College

Student Development. 2011; 52(6):740-8.

16. Adepoju JA, Watkins MP, Richardson AM. A quick survey of an HBCU's first year nursing students' perception of the HIV/AIDS phenomenon. Journal of National Black Nurses'

Association: JNBNA. 2007; 18(2):24.

17. Hodge M, Wade BH. HIV/AIDS perceptions, attitudes and behaviors among HBCU students. Challenge: A Journal of Research on African American Men. 2007; 13(2):13-36.

18. Foreman FE. African American college women: Constructing a hierarchy of sexual arrangements. AIDS Care. 2003 Aug; 15(4):493-504.

19. Duncan C, Miller DM, Borskey EJ, Fomby B, Dawson P, Davis L. Barriers to safer sex practices among African American college students. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002; 94(11):944-51. 20. Hou S. HIV-related behaviors among black students attending historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) versus white students attending a traditionally white institution (TWI). AIDS Care. 2009; 21(8):1050-7.

B-i

In document 2670.pdf (Page 40-43)

Related documents