TEMPERATURE SENSOR PLACEMENT

Appropriate selection of input variables is an important task in modelling. In fact, not all input variables are equally important; some may have no significant effect on the system being modelled. Scholars have shown that a precise selection of thermal sensors and their

Chapter 2: Thermal-Error Modelling Techniques

36

position is needed to ensure the prediction accuracy and robustness of compensation models, better interpretation, and lower measurement costs [32, 46]. The model designers often want to know which sources have a dominant effect and which exert less influence on thermal response of the machine tool. Poor location and a small number of thermal sensors will lead to poor prediction accuracy. However, a large number of thermal sensors may have a

negative influence on a model’s robustness because each thermal sensor may bring noise to

the model as well as bringing useful information. Furthermore, issues relating to sensor reliability are commercially sensitive; the fewer sensors installed the fewer potential failures. Choosing the right sensor location can hugely affect the outcome of compensation models. Engineering judgment, correlation coefficient and stepwise regression have been used to select the temperature sensor placement for thermal error compensation models [30, 31].

The first method is engineering judgment, which is based on an individual’s engineering

experience about thermal displacement, machine heat sources and thermal behavior in order to design the models [31]. It is useful to remove totally uncorrelated sensors and to choose preliminary sensors for further study. For example, the axial movement of the ballscrew and the spindle physically depend on the bearing temperatures of the ballscrew and the spindle, respectively; thus, the bearing temperatures are considered as a possible variable in the models. However, many other error components, such as spindle displacement and squareness errors, have different relationships with temperature behavior on columns or spindle housings. It is unreliable to use a small number of temperature sensors without precise knowledge of thermal behavior in machine elements. It is clearly impossible to select the optimal thermal sensor location on the whole machine only using the engineering judgment.

The second method is a correlation analysis, which uses the correlation coefficients between the thermal displacements and the temperature sensors to select highly correlated

temperatures sensors as compensation model inputs [13, 65, 66]. Since all the selected

sensors are strongly correlated with the thermal displacement, however, the relationships between them were overlooked. The partial correlation between the thermal displacement and the sensors or the correlation between the sensors has to be identified; otherwise the technique is only suitable for designing a model with a single sensor which would impact the accuracy of the final model.

Chapter 2: Thermal-Error Modelling Techniques

37

The third method is a standard stepwise regression [67], which is used to find the best thermal compensation model using the available temperature sensors. Stepwise regression is achieved by including the most strongly correlated sensors and then adding or subtracting one sensor at a time based on statistically significant criteria, thus evaluating the contribution of the added or withdrawn sensor. In each epoch of the stepwise regression procedure, only one sensor is added to or subtracted from the compensation model. The result of combining two or more sensors at a time is not considered. Since the temperature sensors on a machine element are interrelated, the merging of two or more sensors is significant during the modelling procedure. The stepwise regression could end in a model with insignificant sensors.

Moreover, there are further sensor selection methods, such as the sensor placement scheme based on thermal modal analysis [11, 31]. This method has a similar drawback to that of finite element analysis. Yan et al. [46] also proposed an MRA model combing two methods, namely the direct criterion method and indirect grouping method; both methods are based on synthetic Grey correlation. Using this method, the number of temperature sensors was reduced from sixteen to four and the residual range was reduced by 69%. Han et al. [68] proposed a correlation coefficient analysis and fuzzy c-means clustering for selecting temperature sensors both in their regression thermal error model and ANN model [69]; the number of thermal sensors was reduced from thirty-two to five. However, more efforts are still needed in order to prove that the selected sensors are indeed correct and important to the final model.

Sometimes, sensor selection is used in an automated manner in a black-box approach. However, this is not always the optimal approach. In order to develop accurate models, it is necessary to understand that sensor selection methods work under certain assumptions. Nevertheless, when used appropriately, they can give useful knowledge on what sensors seem important, what sensors seem unimportant and what sensors are of intermediate importance. With such knowledge combined with a comprehensive understanding of the data, an accurate approach for sensor selection can be achieved. Therefore, the above-mentioned methods suffer from the following drawbacks: a large amount of data is needed in order to select proper sensors; and the available data must satisfy a typical distribution such as normal (or Gaussian) distribution [70]. Therefore, a systematic approach is still needed to minimise the number of temperature sensors and select their locations so that the downtime and resources can be reduced while robustness is increased. It is notable that most publications deal only

Chapter 2: Thermal-Error Modelling Techniques

38

with the reduction in sensors, but not the means by which the original set were determined. As a result the system is only shown for situations where the possible solutions are a subset of all potential locations, which requires non-trivial preconditioning of the problem. This is a situation where some aspects of the machine spatial temperature gradients might already have been missed and is typical when a machine model is being adapted, rather than evaluated from a new perspective.

This thesis makes extensive use of thermal imaging camera for rapid assessment of machine structure thermal behaviour and development of the compensation models. A thermal imaging camera will be used to record temperature distributions a across the machine structure. Each pixel can be considered as a possible temperature measurement point. This is a good practice where many aspects of the machine spatial temperature gradients might already have been covered.

In this proposed approach, the Grey models and fuzzy c-means clustering are used to determine the major sensors influencing thermal errors of a number of CNC machine tools, which is capable of simplifying the system prediction model. Then ANFIS is used to build a number of thermal prediction models based on selected sensors. This combined methodology can help to improve robustness of the proposed model, and reduce the effect of sensor uncertainty.