Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
11-11-1987
Residential renovation: Architecture, history, and
interior design
Nancy Chwiecko
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion
in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact
ritscholarworks@rit.edu.
Recommended Citation
ROCHESTER
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
A
Thesis Submitted
to the
Faculty
ofthe
College
ofFine
andApplied Arts
in
Candidacy
for
the
Degree
ofMASTER
OF FINE ARTS
Residential Renovation:
Architecture, History,
andInterior Design
By
Nancy
A.
Chwiecko
APPROVALS'
_ _ _ _ _ _ 0
AdviseV':
Charles Lewis
Associate.
Adv~:
Liz Fomin
Associate Adviser:
Houghton Wether aId
Date:
Fl
~
\
£-,
I
\C)
U
Special Assistant to the
Dean of G:raduate Affairs:
Philip Bornarth
Date-:
+ f
-Dean. Collee:e of Fine
&
Applied Arts:
Robert
H.
Johnston Ph.D
Date:
3)~~~J-Jl....B_'t?
_ _
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Project
Choices
3
Design
Philosophy
...6
The
Design
7
Final Details
23
Conclusion
26
Summary
30
Site
Survey
30
Site Analysis
31
Program
Requirements
32
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bragdon,
Claude.
More
Lives
Than
One,
New
York,
New York:
Alfred
A.
Knopf,
1938.
Ching,
Frank.
Building
Construction
Illustrated,
New
York,
New
York:
Van Nostrand Reinhold
Company,
1975.
Insall,
Donald.
The Care
ofOld Buildings
Today, London,
England:
Architectural
Press,
1972.
Moore,
Charles.
The Place
ofHouses,
New
York,
New
York:
Holt, Rinehart,
andWinston,
1974.
Mulloy,
Elizabeth.
National Trust
for
Historic Preservation
1963-73,
Washington,
D.C.
:The Preservation
Press,
1976
.National
Trust
for
Historic
Preservation,
Old
andNew
Architecture
Design
Relationship,
Washington,
D.C:
The Preservation
Press,
1980.
New
York
State Uniform Fire Prevention
andBuilding
Code,
Division
ofHousing
andCommunity
Renewal,
New
York,
New York:
1984.
I,
,
hereby
(grant,
deny)
permission
to
the Wallace Memorial Library of RIT, to reproduce my thesis in whole
or
in
part.
Any
reproduction
will
not
be
for
commerical
use
or
profit.
OR
I,
Nancy A. Chwiecko
prefer
to
be
contacted
each
time
a
reque~t
Pfor production is made.
I
can be reached at the following
address.
Nancy A. Chwiecko
60 Main Street
Introduction"
The
Sloan
house
is
a singlefamily
residenceconsisting
oftwenty-three
rooms.It
is
located
in
anhistorical
preservationdistrict
of similarhomes.
Because
ofthis
andthe
fact
that
it
wasdesigned
by
afamous
Rochester
architect,
Claude Bragdon,
the
house
has both historical
and architectural significance.Built
in
1906
for
William
E.
Sloan,
owner ofSloan
Metal
Company,
it
remainedin
the
Sloan
family
untilvery
recently.The
interior
has
remainedentirely
intact
and no changeshave
been
madesince
1908,
when awing
was added.Architect
Claude
Bragdon
led
adiverse
life,
working
at varioustimes
as anactor,
author,
architect and setdesigner.
While
he
corresponded
regularly
withFrank
Lloyd
Wright
andLouis
Sullivan,
Bragdon'
s main architectural
influence
wasHenry
Hobson
Richardson.
He
particularly
admiredRichardson's
residentialdesign.
That
influence is
most evidentin
the
great centralhall
ofthe
Sloan home.
My
design
takes
into
considerationthe
landmark
qualities ofthe
house
andlimitations
on conversions as setforth
by
the
New
York
State
Fire Prevention
andBuilding
Code.
Working
withinthe
code,
I
first
divided
the
house
into
condominium spaces.I
then
made adetailed
study
of which areas withinthe
house
were most sensitiveto
change.
I
determined
that
some spaces couldbe
totally
altered whileothers were so sensitive
that
they
should remainentirely intact.
For
instance,
the
third
floor
was adark
cluttereddesign
lacking
architectural
detail.
Therefore,
the
space couldbe virtually
gutted-without
impact
to
the
integrity
ofthe
structure.The
entrance
hall
containedarchitecturally
significantfeatures
which weredeserving
ofpreservation.
Change
there
wouldbe
detrimental
to
the
integrity
ofits
architecture.Spaces
mostworthy
ofpreserving
werealso most
difficult
to
design.
This
projecthas
taught
methe
difficulties
of renovation andthe
importance
of preservation.In
the
future
as webecome
morepopulated,
more renovation willtake
place.It
willbecome
increasingly
important
to
preserve our pastfor
both
historical
andProject
Choices
In
considering
my
thesis
goals,I
had
to
first
establish whatkind
of renovationto
usefor
the
Sloan
house.
My
choices weredictated
by
location,
marketneed,
and mostimportantly,
Landmark
Society
priorities.Location is
important
whenconsidering
any
project.It
can makea
difference
how
close a siteis
to
other services and amenities.The
location
ofthe
Sloan house broadened
the
possibilitiesfor
renovation.Its
proximity
to
downtown
Rochester
andlocation
in
a residentialneighborhood allows some
flexibility.
Residential
or commercialsolutions were
both
viable.Market
needis
alwaysimportant
whenlooking
for
a viablesolution
for
renovation.What
do
people need?What
do
they
want?Answers
to
these
crucial questionshelp
solveany
design
problem.One
thing
most people want and needis
convenience.Whether
it
is
living
closeto
work orworking
closeto
doctors,
stores,
etc..Convenience
alsoincludes
proximity
to
major roads andbus
lines
.The
Sloan
house
is
less
than
one milefrom
1-490
andis
onthe
Rochester
bus line.
It is very
accessible.Ability
to
expandin
the
future
is
often aneed,
whethercommercial or residential.
Although
the
Sloan
house
is
situated onapproximately
two
acres,
Landmark
Society
restrictions would makeexpansion
impossible.
When
I
spoke withHenry
McCartney,
Executive
Director
ofthe
Landmark
Society
ofWestern
New
York,
it
did
notreally
matterto
him
whatkind
of projectI
choseto
do.
He
knew
my
participationI
understoodthat
the
Landmark
Society
had
already
establishedthat
the
house
wouldbe
usedonly
as a singlefamily
residence.The
house
is
in
excellent condition and couldbe
inhabited
asis
.Therefore,
for
the
purposes ofmy
thesis,
I
needed a project whichwould
include
spaceplanning
and alteration offunction
and style.Based
onthe
foregoing
considerations,
my
initial
optionsfor
renovation
included
the
following:
1.
Bed
andBreakfast Inn
2.
Office Space
(i.e.,
dentist,
doctor,
etc.)
3.
Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra
(RPO)
Home
4.
Corporate
Headquarters
5.
Research/Development,
Think
Tank
6
.Condominiums
7.
Museum
All
ofthe
above are possible solutionsbut
the
most viable werethose
which reflectedthe
residential nature ofthe
neighborhood.The
main reasonfor
this
is
that
the
house
is
in
anhistorical
preservation
district
whichis
based
onthe
nature ofthe
neighborhood.
It
reflects a part of our culture which nolonger
exists
today;
grandmansions,
genteelwealthy
society,
and patrons ofthe
arts.Because
I
wantedpersonally
to
work withinLandmark
guidelines,
this
became
very important
to
me.Only
two
choices,
outof
the
sevenlisted,
would workin
a residential area: condominiumsand a
home for
the
RPO.
The
RPO
solution appealedto
mebecause
Mrs.
Sloan had been
apatron of
the
arts,
particularly
the
performing
arts.Also,
the
Sloan
family
had
expressed a wishto
the
Landmark
Society
that
the
house
be
used as a residencefor
the
RPO
conductor and smallperformances
I
began
to
pursuethis
avenuebut
soonrealized,
afterspeaking
with
the
Marketing
Manager
atthe
RPO,
that
allthey
really
wantedwere new offices.
I
wantedto
avoidthe
office as a solution sothrough
the
process of eliminationI
wasleft
with one viable use-condominiums.
Unfortunately
the
word condominiumhas
taken
on a negativeconnotation
for
somein
recentyears,
but
hopefully
the
sensitivity
to
space with which
I
have
approachedthis
conversion willallay
anyone's
fears.
The
nextstep
wasto
establish program requirementsbased
onan analysis of
the
house
andits
site.(See
page25-30).
With
this
program
in
mind,
I
could startthe
design
process whichincluded
reading
andinterpreting
the
New
York
State
Uniform
Fire Prevention
and
Building
Code
andmany
trips
to
the
University
ofRochester
Department
ofRare
Books
andSpecial
Collections.
This
archiveproved
invaluable
as a resourcecontaining
allthe
documents
drawn
by
Claude
Bragdon
pertaining
to
the
Sloan
house,
atotal
of overThe Design
""In
orderto
determine
how
the
house
wouldbe
divided
andhow
many
condominium units werepossible,
five
important
elements weretaken
into
consideration.They
were:1.
New
York
State Code Requirements
2
.Economic
Viability
3
.Preservation Limitations
4.
Functional
requirements of eachindividual
unit5
.Aesthetics
The
New
York
State
Uniform
Fire
Prevention
andBuilding
Code
which
I
will referto
asNYS
Code
orthe
Code,
wasdesigned
withthe
health
andsafety
ofthe
general publicin
mind.Included
areprovisions
for
the
handicapped.
The
NYS
Code
is
therefore
necessary
to
the
well-being
ofthe
public andfuture
generations.Any
newbuilding
orbuilding
conversionis
effectedby
the
NYS
Code.
Changing
from
a singlefamily
home
to
condominiums,
asin
the
case of
the
Sloan
house
project,
is
considered a conversion.Any
modifications or changes must adhere
to
the
NYS
Code.
Old
construction must
be
modifiedto
conformto
any
new standards withinthe
Code.
The
Sloan house is
classified(by
the
Code)
asType
4,
Ordinary
Construction,
whichis
basically
masonry
exterior withinterior
members and walls of wood.
A
conversion would changeits
occupancy
classificationfrom
A-l,
One-Family
Dwelling
to
B-l,
Multiple
Dwelling
-Permanent
Occupancy.
1.
NYS,
New
York State Uniform
Fire
Prevention
andBuilding
Code,
1984,
p.36,
Sec.
704. Id.
-NYS
Code
requirements which most affectedmy
conversionincluded
those
for
habitable
space,
light
andventilation,
stairs andmeans of egress.
Stairs
and means of egress(exits)
arethe
mostdifficult
to
incorporate
andbecame
my
primary
considerationduring
the
initial
stages of
design.
The
front
stairway
is
classified as an ornamental2
stair and met requirements
for
use as a means of egress.Another
stair
had
to
be
added which wouldbe
enclosed andlink
the
atticto
the
exterior at grade.The
enclosure wouldhelp
preventthe
spreadof
fire between
floors.
Its location
was criticalbecause
it
had
to
be
within
fifty
feet
of adwelling
unit entrance or onehundred
feet
of3
any
room withinthat
dwelling
unit.Habitable
spaceis
defined
asany
space occupiedby
one or more4
persons
for
living,
sleeping,
eating,
or cooking.The
NYS
Code
requires minimum
ceiling
heights
and squarefootage
for
certainspaces.
These
requirementsaffected
my
design
in
the
attic andbasement
spaces.Because
the
ceiling
slopesin
the
atticI
had
to
keep
the
minimumceiling
height
in
mind.If
I
wantedto
usethe
basement
for
habitable
spaceI
had
to
checkthe
Code
for
spacelocation
with respectto
gradelevel.
I
found
that
in
orderto
usethe
basement
ashabitable
spaceI
wouldhave
to
excavateaccording
to the
5
depth
requirements as setby
the
Code.
2.
Ibid.,
pp.81-82,
Sec.
734.1a,
739.4d-3,
739.4d-4.
3.
Ibid.,
p.86,
p.90,
Table
111-735.
4.
Ibid.,
p.11,
Sec.
606.3.
The
NYS
Code
has
establishedbasic
requirementsfor
naturallight
and natural ventilationfor habitable
spaces.They
arebased
ona ratio of window
opening
to
squarefootage
ofany
habitable
floor
space.
The
Code
requiredthat
"Each
habitable
space shallbe
provided with natural
light,
by
means of openingsdescribed
in
this
section,
in
an amount equivalentto
that
transmitted
through
clearglass
in
areato
eight per cent ofthe
floor
area ofthe
habitable
space."
With
regardto
ventilation,
"Each
habitable
space shallbe
provided with natural ventilation
through
openable parts ofthe
opening
described in
this
section which are equalin
areato
notless
7
than
four
percent ofthe total
floor
area of eachhabitable
space."Again
the
basement
and attic weretwo
areaspotentially
affectedby
these
requirements.The
basement
problem couldbe
solvedby
excavation and
the
attic might need additionaldormers
or skylights.But
any
changesto
the
exterior wouldhave
to
be
consideredfrom
apreservation point of view.
Financial
considerations areimportant
for
any
realdesign
project.
To
makemy
project as realistic as possibleI
had
to
think
about cost of alteration versus
the
benefits.
I
have
to
admitthat
economic constraints
took
abackseat
to
all other considerationsand,
therefore,
I
will presentit
briefly
and simply.In
orderto
calculatecost
I
had
to
know
approximately
how
many
condominiumsI
couldconstruct
based
on squarefootage.
The
total
squarefootage
ofthe
house
is
over10,000
squarefeet.
This
includes
areas such asthe
basement,
centralhall,
and other corridors.The
basement
has
6.
Ibid.,
p.80,
Section
733.2,
733.2b,
7.
Ibid.,
p.81,
Section 733.3b.
-uninhabitable space of
approximately
2,200
squarefeet.
The
centralhall
occupiesnearly
700
squarefeet
onthe
first
floor
and500
squarefeet
onthe
second.This
brings
the
total
ofhabitable
spaceto
about7,600
squarefeet.
Considering
1,100
squarefeet
afair
sizefor
acondominium,
the
number of unitsI
could construct wouldbe
five
orsix.
Square
footage
estimates arebased
on otherlocal
conversionsand new construction.
Determination
ofthe
final
number of units wasbased
onmy
analysis of potential profit.
I
knew
that
the
asking
pricefor
the
house
was$500,000.
$500,000
divided
by
5
=$100,000
per unitfor
land
cost.$500,000
divided
by
6
=$83,000
per unitis
obviously
more cost effective.
Each
unit couldbe
sold after reconstructionfor
$125,000
to
$175,000.
These
figures
arebased
on consultation withlocal
real estate authorities.The
average priceis
approximately
$150,000
x6
=$900,000.
Six
units would generate atotal
of$400,000
for
alterations,
renovation,
fees,
and profitfor
adeveloper.
Preservation
and aesthetic considerations were also part ofthe
initial
decision.
I
approachedthis
by
analyzing
the
integrity
ofthe
spaces.
What
this
meansis
that
some spaces areextremely
sensitiveto
change while other areas couldbe
completely
altered.This
study
of
sensitivity
wasbased
onmy
field
observations ofthe
house.
(See
Sloan
House
Site
Survey,
page25)
(See
figures
1-4
for
originalplans)
8.
Based
onmy
ownstudy
of condominium salesin
Rochester
With
the
exception ofthe
kitchen,
the
first floor
and centralhall
would suffer
the
mostfrom
additionalwalls,
plumbing,
or removal offeatures.
The
front
hall
is,
to
me,
the
most magnificent part ofthe
house.
I
decided
notto
change,
enclose,
ordisrupt it.
The
Dining
Room
was another space whichI
felt
should notbe
changed.Its
ceiling is
covered with a gildedfabric
andhas
afloral design
painted onit
whichI
choseto
preserve.The
room,
ofhandsome
proportionand symmetrical
organization,
would sufferfrom
any
division.
The
Living
Room
has
a plaster castdetail
onthe
ceiling
whichis
alsodeserving
of preservation.I
felt
that
because
ofthe
room's generoussize,
very
long
andlow,
that
it
could withstand somedivision
aslong
as
the
ceiling
remained untouched andintegrity
ofthe
total
space wasunobstructed.
In
otherwords,
a partialdivider
couldbe
added,
subdividing
the
spacefunctionally
but
not visually.The
Billiard'sRoom
is
by
far
the
lightest
andbrightest
room onthe
first
floor,
primarily
because it has
windows onthree
sides.I
felt
that
it
couldwithstand some change as
long
asthe
composition ofthe
woodworkwas not
disturbed
andthat
the
openness ofthe
space was notviolated.
Most
ofthe
secondfloor
couldbe
altered withoutendangering
the
architecture ofthe
house.
The
upperhallway
is
anintegral
partof
the
front hall
onthe
first
floor
because it
sharesthe
same spatialposition,
symmetry,
and columns.In
addition,
this
spacetangibly
represents a
bygone
era.Therefore,
I
felt
that
this
space mustremain unaltered.
I
alsofelt
that
all ofthe
fireplaces
onthe
secondfloor
must remain.Paint
couldbe
removedfrom
mantels and otherwoodwork.
The
bathrooms,
although quitelarge,
(one
is
thirteen
feet
by
thirteen
feet)
were not as elegant asthey
mightbe
and werefunctionally
obsolete.
Economizing
ontheir
space would provide spacefor
better
uses.
The
third
floor
is
by
far
the
least
sensitive space.As
long
asthe
exterior was notdrastically
altered,
the
interior
couldbe
completely
reorganized.As
my
Site
Survey
(page
29)
shows,
the
space
is
a series ofsmall,
narrow rooms.Probably initially
conceivedas servants'
quarters and a place
to
convalesce,
Bragdon's
originaldrawings
included
a"hospital
room"on
the
third
floor.
It
is
apparent
that
nottoo
muchtime
was spentin
planning
the
space.However,
Bragdon
did
take
time
to
design linen
storage andcabinetry
which could
be
reusedin
other areas ofthe
house.
The
attichas
dormer
windows and one small skylight.The
skylight
is
onthe
flat
section ofthe
roof.This
flat
sectionis
approximately
eightfeet
wide andthirty-four
feet
long
.A
skylightcould
easily
be
incorporated
into
its
entirelength
bringing
light
9
required
by
Code
, withoutbeing
visiblefrom
the
exterior,
thus
conforming
to
preservation guidelines.I did
not wantto
addany
newdormers
or skylights which wouldbe
visiblefrom
the
road.In my final
planI
did
add onedormer.
It
was added
to
meetthe
Code
for
light
and ventilation requirements.I
placedit
exactly
whereClaude
Bragdon
had
included
onein
his
original
drawings.
For
an unknown reasonit
was neverbuilt.
9.
NYS,
New
York
State
Uniform
Fire
Prevention
andBuilding
Code,
p.80,
Section
733.2b.
The
last
space considered wasthe
basement.
The
only
roomwhich could
be
usedfor
habitable
space wasthe
Playroom.
It
has
afireplace
and woodfloor.
Two
ofits
three
windows arelarge
enoughto
meetlight
and ventilation requirements.But
because
morethan
four
feet
ofthe
walls arebelow
grade,
the
ground wouldhave
to
be
excavated
along
the
entirelength
ofthe
wallto
meetCode
requirements.
This
is
afeasible
solution and one which wouldactually
enhancethe
condominium.Outside
I
could add a smallterrace
to
create a private outdoor space.The ceiling in
the
Playroom
wouldhave
to
be lowered
atleast
sixinches
to
covermany
pipes andducts.
The
floor
has
to
be
replacedsince
it is
structurally
unsound.The
remaining
basement
space could accommodatestorage,
laundry
rooms,
maintenance,
utilities,
and maybe a recreation room.During
the
initial
stages ofthis
design
I
drew
boundaries
for
potential condominiums.
I
createdthree
different
proposals(see
_. .ABCD
ABCD
ABCD. ...Figures
5
,6 ,7)
.All
three
proposals wouldhave
five
ofthe
units ontwo
stories.All
ofthe
proposals would requireadditional stairs.
This
does
notinclude
the
possibility
ofmoving
existing
stairs,
whichin
fact,
did
happen.
The
mostimportant
consideration
became
unit size.At
least
one unithad
as much as1,900
squarefeet
while othersbarely
had
1,100
squarefeet.
To
accommodate market
need,
I
sought a more evendistribution.
The
third
proposal rangedfrom
about1,200
squarefeet
to
just
over1,600
11.
Ibid.,
pp.77-78,
Section
732.2b,
732.2b-l,
732.2b-2,
-square
feet.
It
was also abetter
planfor
providing
a requiredfire
stair.
My
third
proposal,
Figures
7
A-D,
was adoptedbased
on aneven
distribution
of space.(See
figures
8,
10,
11,
12,
and site planfigures
13
&
14
for
final
design)
.It
was also easierto
incorporate
afire
stair.At
this
stageI
couldbegin
to
develop
eachunit,
but
first
I
needed a general
idea
of what each unit would need.(See
Program
Requirements,
page30).
I
alsobegan
a cardboard model ofthe
atticspace.
Working
three
dimensionally
allowed me an accurateunderstanding
ofthe
angular space.Because
the
roofslopes,
the
actual amount of useable
floor
space canbe
deceptive if
studiedonly
two
dimensionally.
Development
of each unit wasbased
on several resources andvisits
to
local
condominiums andapartments,
both
conversions andnew construction.
With
this
information
I
concluded what most peopledesired.
After
visiting
one conversion at anHistoric
Landmark
sitein
Canandaigua
I became
convincedthat
two
bedroom
units were more12
desirable
than
onebedroom
units.The
reasonis
that
a secondbedroom
canbe
usedfor
children,
guests,
or as astudy
/work
room.I
alsolearned
that
units with one and one-halfto
two
bathrooms
soldbetter
than
those
withonly
onebathroom.
Units
withmany
amenities
such as
fine
woodwork,
fireplaces,
unusual windows andpleasing
views sold
faster
andfor
moremoney
than
other units.Diversity
offloor
plans which maintain uniqueness can alsobe
significant.
12.
Based
onmy
ownstudy
ofBrigham Hall
Condominiums,
Knowing
that
one'shome
is
different
from
one's neighbor'shome
is
important
to
many
people.I
readCharles
Moore's
A
Place
ofHouses,
whichdescribes
the
evolution of
the
home
andthe
logical
placement of rooms and utilities.In
the
back
ofthe
book
is
included
a checklist of questionsto
askwhen one
designs
ahome.
The
questions are gearedtoward
aspecific occupant who wants a specific
home.
They
were stillinteresting
to
mebecause
they
made methink
abouthow
onedesigns
a
home.
I
also realizedthat
whatI
desired
in
ahome
may
notfit
everyone's needs.
When
designing
acondominium,
with no specificoccupant
in
mind,
a more general approach mustbe
taken.
I
had
afirm idea
ofthe
potential markettype,
but
consideredthem
as groupsof people and not
individuals.
These
groupsincluded
empty
nesters(those
whose children weregrown)
andyoung
professional coupleswithout children.
Based
onthe
aboveinformation
I
cameto
the
following
conclusions.
I
electedto
have
one and one-halfto
two
bedrooms
in
each unit.
There
wouldbe
one and one-halfto
two
bathrooms
wherever possible.
Each
unitin
the
final
proposalincludes
atleast
one
full bath
and a powder room.One
unithas
two
full baths
and apowder room.
Laundry
facilities
areespecially important.
Every
unitwould
have
spacefor
a washer anddryer
either nearthe
kitchen,
bathroom,
storagecloset,
orin
the
basement.
The
laundry
roomwould
be
accessiblefrom
within each unit.Kitchens
arebased
onefficiency
of space.Galley
kitchens
make alot
of sensebecause
they
do
not waste space and areeasy
for
one ortwo
peopleto
workin.
Eat-in kitchens
were not vitalbut if
room allowedI tried
to
fit in
a-table
or counterfor two.
Three kitchens included
roomfor
tables
orbooths for
morepeople.
Kitchens
were placed withexisting
plumbing
in
mind afterconsidering
the
ease ofadding
newplumbing
stacks.Each
unit was given alarge
combinationliving
/dining
room.Extra
space was usedfor
studies ortelevision
rooms.Two
unitswere given enclosed porches with
privacy
for
relaxing
.One
unit wasprovided with a private outdoor
living
space andtwo
othershave
direct
accessto
the
outside.Storage
wasincluded
for
each unit.Basement
storage ofapproximately
180
squarefeet
per unitis
eitherdirectly
accessiblethrough
a unit orpublicly
accessiblefrom
alocked
exterior entrance.
Storage in
the
form
ofmany
closets wasincluded
in
each space.Each
unitboasts
some unique amenities.These
amenities areinherent
to
the
building's
originaldesign.
They
arethose
extra-special
details
which arerarely
done
today
and wouldbe
difficult
to
duplicate.
Craftsmen
arehard
to
find
andthe
cost wouldbe
prohibitive.These
amenitiesinclude
woodwork andtrim,
wainscot,
bookmatched
paneling,
patterned woodfloors,
leaded
windows,
stainedglass,
curvedwindows,
elegantfireplaces,
woodcarvings,
plastercast
details,
hand-painted
patternedceilings,
built-in
cabinets,
pedestal
sinks,
marblesinks,
pleasant views ofthe
generouslandscaped
yard andcharming
nooks and crannies.The
fireplaces
aredistinct
and varied.Five
unitshave
atleast
one
fireplace.
Three
have
two
fireplaces.
Only
two
fireplaces
aresimilar
in
detail.
Some
have
carvedmahogany
woodwork with marblehearths
and reflect a colonial style.The
first
floor
fireplace
in
11)
is
Tudor
style withdistinctly
carved medievaldetails.
The
four
fireplaces
onthe
secondfloor
have
woodtrim
whichis
painted.These
couldbe
stripped orleft
painted.The
woodworkdetailing
throughout
the
house
is
extensive andalso varied.
For
instance,
the
living
roomin
Condominium
C-l
(refer
to
figure
9)
has
two
feet
high
wainscot ofmahogany
with a widebaseboard
andtrim.
The
former
Dining
Room,
now part ofCondominium
C-3
(figure
9)
has
sixfeet
high
mahogany
wainscot.The
living
room areain
C-2,
former
Billiard's
Room,
(figure
9)
has
bookmatched
oakpaneling
onthe
walls and ceiling.Windows
alsovary
throughout
the
house.
The
main entrancehall,
which wouldbe
acommunity
space,
has
a magnificenttwo
story
bay
window with stained glass medallionsdepicting
signs ofthe
Zodiac.
Similarly,
leaded
windows with stained glass medallions ofmedieval chess players can
be
found in
the
living
area ofC-2.
These
medallions were all
designed
by
Claude
Bragdon.
The
curved wallsand windows
in
the
front
ofthe
house
are enjoyedby
four
ofthe
units.
The
secondfloor
is
generally
more uniformin
detailing
but
it
has
qualities of airiness andbrightness
which are notfound
onany
of
the
otherfloors
.The
materials onthe
secondfloor
are ofhigh
quality.
These
materialsinclude
solidmahogany
doors,
woodfloors,
wood
trim,
andleaded
windows.The
third
floor's
uniquenessis
its
overall sense ofprivacy
andcoziness;
its
informality
and morecontemporary
ambiance.The
restof
the
house
acts as abuffer
to
outside noises andintrusions.
Details
Once I had
a workablefloor
plan ofdesignated
spacesthe
details
became important.
Some
ofthese
details
had been
conceivedfrom
the
start while others were
discovered
during
the
design
process.Special
considerations wentinto
designing
two
specific areas ofthe
house.
These
wentbeyond
the
usualdecisions
of whereto
remove awall or put a new one.
Considerations
included
the
following
: ageneral
decision
ofstyle,
new ortraditional;
orblending
new withold;
taking
a risk orplaying
it
safe;
the
influence
ofClaude
Bragdon
and a
brief study
ofEuropean
methods of renovation.The
two
specific areas ofthe
house
werein
Condominiums
C-l
and
C-2
(figure
9),
the
former
Living
Room
andBilliard's
Room.
Each
space would needto
include
aliving
room,
dining
area,
and akitchen.
The
first
consideration wasthat
the
rooms remainuntouched.
For
instance,
I
did
not wantto
violatethe
ceiling
in
Condominium
C-l
because
ofthe
plaster castdetail
orthe
wallsin
either condominium.
In
orderto
do
this
I
wouldhave
to
build
unitswithin,
anddetached
from,
the
outside enclosures ofthe
space.It
was suggested
that
I
researchEuropean
renovations.Europeans
have
been
dealing
withlack
of space andthe
renovation of
historical
sitesfor
along
time.
I
found
avariety
ofideas
ranging
from
contemporary
officesin
cathedralsto
roomsin
homes
which weredivided
by
moveable glass walls which permittedvisual openness and physical
privacy
atthe
sametime
.I
found
contemporary
stairs which wereopen,
attractive and not asforeboding
asthe
usual spiral staircases.The
floating
treads
ofspiral staircases can
be unsettling
to
some people.Mario
Botta,
the
Italian
architect,
has
designed
stairs which economize space yet areused
in
morethan
just
a spiral configuration.They
alsohave
riserswhich eliminate
that
unsettling
feeling
which open risers andfloating
treads
can give.I
knew
that
my
design
wouldincorporate
openness and notbe
physically
attachedto
the
walls.The
moredifficult
decision
waswhether
to
use atraditional
approach or acontemporary
one.My
first
impulse
wastraditional,
probably
because
I
knew
it
wouldbe
most acceptable
to
morepeople,
especially
in
conservativeRochester.
I
thought
I
wouldincorporate
updated versions ofthe
originaldetails
using
the
same materials orvery
similar ones.I
wasbeginning
to
imagine
the
house
furnished in
traditional
trappings.
But
did
I
wantdesign
which wouldblend
into
the
background
or one which wouldjump
out at you?It
all camedown
to
afinal
matter oftaking
a riskor
playing it
safe.What
wouldClaude
Bragdon
do?
My
knowledge
ofClaude
Bragdon
is
based
uponhis
drawings
that
I
worked with andhis
autobiography
More
Lives
Than
One.
Before
I
readhis
book
I
madethe
assumptionthat
I
woulddiscover
an
egotistical,
self-important,
opinionated architect.This really
couldnot
be
further
from
the
truth.
I
found
him
to
be
ahumble,
self-effacing
man.His
interests
wentfar
beyond
architecture.Acting,
writing,
andthe
occultactually
took
up
more ofhis life.
Claude
Bragdon
was an architectfor
a small portion ofhis
life
and
he
did
not chooseto
enterthe
professionbut
ratherfell into it.
He
had
been
adraftsman
and workedhis
way
into
architectural
design.
He
tended
to
be
afollower
ratherthan
aleader
and was-greatly
influenced
by
the
architects,
Henry
Hobson
Richardson
andMcKim, Mead,
andWhite.
He
sumsup
his
architectural career andhis
successesin
this
paragraph
taken
from his
autobiography."Always
a gooddraughtsman,
I
became
in
time,
and withexperience,
a goodarchitect,
but
I
camelate
-too
late
-to
the
realization
that
eclecticismin
architecture was a vicious circleleading
nowhere.When
I
did
realizeit
the
theatre
absorbed me
-my
career as an architect cameto
an end.Only
afew
things
done in
this
field
satisfy
me :I
like
alittle
Italian
Presbyterian
Church I built in Rochester because
ofits
being
socheap
and sodirect
a solution ofthe
given problem whilebreathing
forth
afaintly
Italianate
air.I
like
the
Bevier
Memorial
Building
ofthe
Rochester
Mechanic's
Institute
because,
although'a
factory
proposition,'
it is
handled
in
such away
asto
givethe
effect of a work of architectural art.I
take
satisfaction alsoin
the
First
Universalist
Church
ofRochester
because
ofthe
way
it
pilesup
andthe
pleasing
effect ofits
pattern-brickwork usedin
conjunction with colouredtile.
I
shall close withthe
consideration of
the
Peterborough
Bridge
andthe
New
York
Central
Station
atRochester.
Not
that
I
think
there
is
anything
wonderful about either ofthese
constructions,
but in
discussing
them
I
can perhaps give aninsight
into
the
problems which confront andthe
difficulties
whichbeset
the
practitionerin
this
most
limited
andexacting
ofthe
fine
arts-the
frustrations,
the
false,,
starts,the
failures
which attendany
kind
of successin
it."13
As
afollower
of eclecticism and otherarchitects,
Bragdon
wasdefinitely
not a risk-taker.This
becomes
most evidentin
his
residential
design.
These
are alwaysbased
on someone else's work orprevious styles.
Residential
workfor
Bragdon
was notdone
for
intellectual,
theoretical,
or philosophical reasonsbut
for
practicalones.
Generally
designed
for
wealthierclientele,
they
werehis bread
and
butter.
Bragdon
had
certainly
been
exposedto
more modernthoughts
and philosophies.
The Frank Lloyd Wright house
aroundthe
corner13.
C.
Bragdon.
More Lives Than
One,
1938,
pp.160-161,
from
the
Sloan
house
wasliving
proof ofthat.
It
wasbuilt
atthe
same
time
asthe
Sloan
House,
but
the
Sloan
house
fits
into
the
surrounding
neighborhood ofstately
traditional
homes.
The
fact
that
most of
the
neighborhoodlooks
like
the
Sloan
house
ratherthan
the
Wright house is
certainly
notdue
to
any
failure
ofWright but
ratherthe
conservative nature ofthe
Rochester
population.Bragdon
admiredWright
andSullivan
for
their
functionalist
approach
but
washimself
too
caughtup in
the
eclecticism ofthe time.
At
first
I
thought
I
did
not wantto
offendBragdon's
design
by
adding
anything
contemporary.When
I
readhis
own account ofhis
architecture,
andI
discovered
that
only
afew
things
he
did
satisfiedhim
andthat
none ofthem
werehomes,
I
felt it
wastime
for
Claude
to
take
a risk.I
decided I
wouldtake
the
riskfor him.
Instead
ofincorporating
similardetails
into
the
originaldesign
I
wanted
to
createstartling
imagery
within a staid setting.This
feeling
grew stronger aftermy
last
visitto
the
house.
It
wasmy
longest
visit andthe
house
wascompletely
empty.The
living
roomand
the
billiard's
room seemed sodark
and oppressivethat
the
last
Condominiums
C-l
andC-2:
Final
Details
(Figures
8
-14)
The
kitchens
in
both
Condominiums
C-l
andC-2
andthe
stairsin
C-2 became
this
startling imagery.
I
tried to
incorporate
them
into
the
originalhouse
through
use of materialsbut
left
the
design
ofeach
feature
crisp,
clean,
and stark.They
provide asharp
contrastto the
original space.(See
renderings)
(Figures
15
-20)
In
both
kitchens
I
created partial wallsfive
and one-halffeet
high.
This
allowedthe
ceilingsto
remain unobstructed and acomplete view of
the
original rooms.Partial
wallsin
contemporary
kitchen
design
are quite commonbut usually
they
areonly
atthree
orfour
feet
and allow a view of allthe
clutter onthe
counter.I
chosefive
and one-halffeet
partly
because
ofthis
and alsobecause
it
would obscure
the
mechanics ofthe
kitchen
including
the
refrigerator.
An
extrafoot
was addedto
the
normal counter width oftwo
feet.
This
allowedfor
some storage abovethe
counter onthe
kitchen
side and
bookshelves
or storage onthe
bottom
ofthe
opposite side.(See
renderings)
The
kitchen
in
Condominium
C-l
has
adivider
of pinkish marblewhich matches
the
originalfireplace
hearth.
I
inlaid
a warmgrey
pattern which reflects
the
ceiling
design.
Along
withthe
marbleitself,
this
helps
to
relatethe
divider
to
the
original room.The
divider
creates a monolithicimage
of a solid marbleblock
in
the
middle of
the
room.This
becomes
dramatic
and acknowledgesthe
alteration.
Both
kitchens
have
contemporary,
slickcabinetry
coloredin
alighter
neutraltone.
This
wouldhelp
brighten
the
space,
define
it
-as a
kitchen,
and provide a cleanlook
whichI
feel
is
particularly
important
for
akitchen.
The
kitchen
in
Condominium
C-2
has
the
addedfeature
ofpass-through
doors
abovethe
kitchen
counter.This
would permitthe
occupantthe
choice of openness or privacy.The
opposite side ofthis
divider
wouldbe
covered with alight
oak veneer which wouldmatch
the
adjacent stairs.This
type
ofkitchen
is
also usedin
Condominium
C-4 but is probably
not asstartling
because
the
originalspace
has already been
painted andthere
wouldbe less
contrast.Condominium
C-2
has
addeddrama
createdby
a stair.This
stair
is
based
onthe
style ofMario
Botta
whichI
have
previously
mentioned.
The
maindifference
is
that
I
had
to
add anosing
oneach
tread
whichhis
stairslack,
but
is
necessary
to
meetNYS
Code
requirements.
When
designing
this
stairI
carefully
consideredits
positionin
the
room.I
chosethe
centerfor
visualimpact.
In
the
centerthe
stair
does
occupy
afair
amount of spacebut
I
felt
that
its
visualimpact
was worthit.
The
openness ofits
design
permits perceptionof
the
original room.The
fact
that
one can see over and underit
gives a visual sense of space which an enclosed stair would
have lost.
I
needed a visual meansto
relatethe
stairto
the
surrounding
space.
My
answer wasthe
floor.
The existing floors
throughout
the
house
are worn andin
need ofrefinishing,
soI
decided
to
lighten
the
floor in Condominium
C-2
by
stripping
andrefinishing.
The
14.
NYS,
New
York
State Uniform Fire
Prevention
and
Building
stairs would
have
amatching
light
oakfinish
onthe
risers andtreads.
There
wouldbe
little
distinction
between
the
stairs andthe
floor
.
-Conclusion
The
rest ofthe
alterationsto
the
house
areless
startling
by
comparison.
More
conventional means were employed.The
endresults are
generally
pleasing
spaces.I
like
to
think
that
I
wouldenjoy
living
in
any
one ofthem.
The only
oneI
would growtired
ofis
C-6
andthat
is
because
of allthe
stairsI
would needto
climbto
get
there.
I
like
to
think
that
the
riskI
took
was worthit.
I
know
somepeople are
too
shockedby
my
combination of old and new.I
understand
their
viewpoint.Normally
I find
a safe middle groundbut
this
time
I
could not resistthe
risk.In
general,
I
feel
I
have
maintained
the
originalintegrity
anddignity
ofthe
spaces.The floor
plan works well.