• No results found

Construction and characterization of poliovirus subgenomic replicons.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Construction and characterization of poliovirus subgenomic replicons."

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

0022-538X/88/051687-10$02.00/0

Copyright C)1988,American Society forMicrobiology

Construction and

Characterization of Poliovirus

Subgenomic

Replicons

GERARDO KAPLAN AND VINCENTR. RACANIELLO*

Departmentof Microbiology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York 10032

Received4 November1987/Accepted26January 1988

Poliovirus RNAscontaining in-frame deletions within thecapsid-coding region were produced by in vitro transcription of altered poliovirustype1cDNA byusing bacteriophageT7 RNApolymerase. Three RNAswere transcribed that contained deletions of2,317 nucleotides (bases 747to3064), 1,781 nucleotides (bases 1,175to 2,956), and 1,295 nucleotides (bases 1,175to2,470).Allthreesubgenomic RNAsreplicatedafter transfection into HeLa cells,demonstrating thatsequencesencoding thecapsid polypeptidesare notessentialfor viral RNA replication in vivo. Viral RNA containing the largest deletion (Rl) replicated approximatelythreetimes better thanfull-lengthRNAproduced in vitro. Northern blot (RNA blot) hybridization analysisof total cellular RNA from HeLa cellsatdifferent times after transfection withRldemonstrated thepresenceof increasingamounts of theexpected5.1-kilobasesubgenomicRNA.Analysis by immunoprecipitation of viral proteins induced after transfection of Rl RNA into HeLa cells revealed the presence of proteins 2APrO, 2C, and

3D°"'

and its precursors, suggestingthat the polyprotein cleavages are similar to those occurring in virus-infected cells. Replication ofP2/Lansingvirion RNAwasinhibited bycotransfectionwiththe Rlreplicon, asdemonstrated by hybridization analysis withaserotype-specific oligonucleotide probe. A higher level of inhibition of RNA replication was observed when P2/Lansing RNA was cotransfected into HeLa cells with truncated Rl transcripts(Ri-Pvull)that weremissing395 3' nucleotides and apoly(A)tail. Theseinternally andterminally deleted RNAs inhibitedthe replication ofsubgenomic replicons Rl, R2, and R3 and caused a reduction in plaque size when cotransfected withPl/MahoneyorP2/Lansing viral RNA, suggesting that individual cells had received both RNAs. No inhibition of plaque size was observed when replicon RNAs were used that were missing1,384 or 1,8393' nucleotides orcontained plasmid-derived sequencesdownstreamof the 3' poly(A). Thetrans-actinginhibitory effect ofRi-Pvullonthereplication of poliovirusP2/LansingRNAdidnotinvolve entryof RNA intocells andappearedtoreduceviraltranslation and RNAsynthesislate in the infectioncycle.

Poliovirus,theprototypeofthePicornaviridaefamily,is a

nonenveloped animal virus containing an RNA genome of

7,440 bases (13, 24). The viral RNA, which is covalently

linked atits5' end to asmallproteinknown asVPg, contains

anuntranslatedleaderof745basesfollowedbyalargeopen

reading frame, a 71-base 3' untranslated region, and a

poly(A)tract.The longopenreadingframeis translated into

a

polyprotein

thatis cleavedbythe twoviral proteases3Cpr0

and2APrO toproduce mature viral proteins.

Replication of the RNA genome ofpoliovirus has been

studied forthelast 30 years with thegoalofidentifyingand

purifyingviraland cellularproteins involved in thisprocess.

Much less attention has been devoted to identifying se-quences in the RNA genome that are required for its

replication. Previous work on poliovirus defective

interfer-ing (DI) particles indicatedthat partsoftheP1region ofthe

RNA, encodingthe capsid proteins, couldbe deleted

with-outaffectingtheability ofthe DI RNAs toreplicate (4-7, 15,

18, 21, 22). Theabilitytorecoverinfectiouspoliovirusfrom

cloned cDNA(25) enablesadirect testoftheimportanceof

genomic sequences in viral replication. Recently, several

poliovirus mutants were isolated which possess defects in

RNAsynthesis.Thelocations of the lesionsresponsible for

thephenotypesof these mutantsindicatethatboth the 5' and

3' noncoding regionsareimportant forRNAreplication(26,

29).

The demonstration that RNA transcripts synthesized in vitro are infectious when transfected into cultured cells suggests another approach to identifying sequences

impor-* Correspondingauthor.

tant forreplication that circumvents the need for isolating

viable virusmutantswith RNA- phenotypes (12, 34). Since

transfection ofcultured cells with poliovirus is quite

effi-cient, it should be possible to produce RNAs containing a

desired mutation, transfect the altered RNA into cultured

cells, and study replication and translation. Here, we used

thisapproachtoshow that theentirecapsidcodingsequence

ofthe poliovirus genome is not

required

for translation or

RNAreplication. Furthermore, cotransfection ofthese

sub-genomic RNAswith wild-type viralRNAresultedin

inhibi-tion of replication ofthe wild-type RNA. In the course of

theseexperiments, it becameapparentthat the same

subge-nomicRNAs,producedbytranscription ofcDNAlinearized

at aspecific internalsite, arepotent trans inhibitors of viral

replication. Althoughthemechanism of this inhibition is not

known, its study may elucidate molecular interactions that

occurduringreplication in vivo.

MATERIALSANDMETHODS

Cells and viruses. HeLa S3 cells were grown in Spinner cultures and plated in 6-cm-diameter plastic tissue culture dishes(3 x

106

cellsperdish)24hbeforeuse(16). Stocks of

P1/Mahoney/41 and P2/Lansing/37 derived from infectious

cDNAs(23,25)werepreparedin HeLacellSpinnercultures

andpurified byequilibrium centrifugationinCsCIgradients.

Virion RNAwasextracted with

phenol-chloroform-1%

so-dium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), precipitated withethanol, and

suspended in

H20

asdescribedpreviously (25, 32).

Antisera. Anti-3DP1P serum was obtained from rabbits immunized with anEscherichiacoli

trpE-3DPoI

fusion

poly-peptidethatwasisolated from bacteriaharboring p3DX(Fig.

1687

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

(2)

0 38vl

-mw XhoI linkes p3oDX

322 654 461

NwmberOf,i

i

ITrpE 3C 1 3DOft

FIG. 1. Construction ofatrpE-replicase fusion expression

plas-mid.Thepoliovirusprocessingmapisshownatthetop. Theamino acid composition of the predicted fusion product is shown at the bottom.

1).This plasmidwasconstructed by insertingaP1/Mahoney

cDNAfragment, from base 5825 through the 3' end, into the expression vector pATH2 (31), followed by insertion ofan

8-nucleotide XhoI linker at the SmaI site to place the poliovirus sequencesand the trpEgene in the same reading frame. The resulting plasmid, p3DX, encodes afusion

pro-tein consisting of 322 N-terminal amino acids of the trpE protein followed by 6 amino acids generated by polylinker

sequences, 54aminoacids of3CPrO, andtheentire

polymer-ase3DP01. Toprepare antiserum against the fusion polypep-tide, a100-ml culture ofE. coli containing this plasmid was

starved foramino acids and induced with indoleacrylic acid. Aninsoluble protein fractionwasprepared (30) and

fraction-ated on a 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The fusion poly-peptide (1,000

Rg)

was excised from the gel, emulsified in

Freund complete adjuvant, and inoculated into two female NewZealandWhite rabbits. After several boosts, the result-ing antiserum immunoprecipitated the viral RNA

polymer-ase 3DPo1 andits precursors from infected cells (see Fig. 5, lane 6, and Fig. 12, lanes 12and 13).

Rabbit anti-2C (3) and anti-2APr" sera, gifts from D. Baltimore, were obtained from rabbitsimmunized with the

corresponding proteins purified frominfected cells.

Construction of plasmids containing P1 deletions. (i) pT7R1. P1/Mahoney cDNA in vector pSV20 (16; pSV20 [PVX2])wascleaved with KpnI (siteatnucleotide3068),and

a SmaI linker was added to form pSV20[PVsma39]. This plasmid was then cleaved with SmaI and digested with

exonuclease Bal 31 (International Biotechnologies, Inc.), recircularized afterthe addition of SmaI linkers, and trans-formed into E. coli. Nucleotide sequenceanalysis wasused

to identify a clone containing a deletion from base 747 to

base4186, designated pSV20[PVsma39dlB5]. Torestorethe Gln-Gly cleavage site at the C terminus of P1, pSV20 [PVsma39dlB5] was cleaved with SmaI, ligated to EcoRI linkers, and cleaved with EcoRI (site at the 3' end of poliovirus cDNA) and the large fragment was gel purified.

Next, pSV20[PVsma39] was treated in the same way, and

the small DNA fragment was purified. These two DNAs

were ligated, producing pVR112, a full-length cDNA

con-tainingadeletion of nucleotides 747to 3064. Torestorethe

reading frame across the deletion, this plasmid was opened at the EcoRI site at base 3064, blunted with Klenow frag-ment,andreligated. Nucleotide sequence analysis confirmed that thefinal product, pVR115, contained an in-frame dele-tion of bases 747 to 3064. The KpnI fragment of pVR115, from bases 68 to 3664, was then excised and used to replace

thecorrespondingfragment in the T7-transcription plasmid

pT7PV1-5 (34;giftof E. Wimmer).

(ii) pT7R2. pT7PV1-5 DNA was cleaved with SnaBI and NruI at positions 2956 and 1174, respectively. The SnaBI ends were filled in with Klenow polymerase, and the DNA wasrecircularized and transformed into E. coli. Nucleotide sequence analysis was used to identify one plasmid that

containeda 1,782-base-pairdeletion in P1.

(iii)pT7R3.pT7PV1-5 was cleaved with NheI and NruIat

positions 2470 and 1174, respectively, the NheI site was

filled in as described above, and the recircularized DNA was used totransformE.coli. Nucleotide sequenceanalysis was used toidentify oneplasmid that contained a1,292-base-pair

deletion in P1.

Allplasmids were grown in E. coli DH1 (10) and purified by equilibrium centrifugation in CsCl in the presence of ethidiumbromide (19).

Invitro RNAsynthesis andtransfection. In vitrosynthesis ofRNAfrom cDNAtemplates wasperformedusing T7 RNA

polymerase (Pharmacia, Inc.). Reaction mixtures (50 ,u)

contained2

plg

ofplasmidDNA[linearizedwith EcoRI (Fig.

2) to leave two bases past thepoliovirus poly(A)], 1 mM each

nucleoside triphosphate, 1 U of RNasin (Promega Biotec)

per

RI,

0.5 ,ugofbovine serumalbumin (RNase and DNase

free; Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals) (per ,ul), 5 mM

dithiothreitol, 40 mM Tris hydrochloride (pH 8.0), 15 mM

MgCI2,

and 30 UofT7 RNApolymerase. After incubation

for30min at 37°C, the RNA wasexamined by

electropho-resis in a 1% agarose gel (16) and used to transfect HeLa cellswithoutfurtherpurification.Marker RNAs (seeFig. 11) were produced in the same manner except that

[32P]UTP

was substituted for UTP. RNAsproduced by transcription

ofpT7PV1-5, pT7R1, pT7R2, andpT7R3 werenamed

PV1-5, Rl, R2, and R3, respectively.

RNAscontainingdeletionsattheir 3' ends were produced

by linearizing plasmids withPvuII (site at nucleotide 7055)

before transcription. The RNAs produced in this waywere namedR1-PvuII, R2-PvuII, andR3-PvuII. Other sites used

tolinearizepT7R1 beforetranscriptionweretheHindlIl site

at nucleotide6056 and theBglII site at nucleotide 5601.

Similar amounts of RNA (approximately 20 ,ug) were

synthesized in each reaction, regardless of which DNA

template was used and at which site the template was linearized. In all instances the predominant productofthe

transcription reaction was RNA ofthe expected length, as

judged by agarose gelelectrophoresis.

Unlessotherwiseindicated, one-fifth ofaT7transcription reactionwasusedtotransfect each 6-cmplateof HeLacells,

using DEAE-dextran as a facilitator (33). In some

experi-ments transfected cells were covered with an agar overlay andplaqueswerecounted 48 h laterasdescribedpreviously

(25).

Analysisof

[35S]methionine-labeled

polypeptides. To

exam-ine polypeptides in HeLa cells transfected with RNAs, cell

monolayers were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and incubatedfor 45 minat 37°C in2 mlof methionine-free Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (GIBCO Laboratories)

containing50,uCiof[35S]methionine(1,383Ci/mmol;

Amer-sham Corp.). After this time, the labeling medium was removed, and the cells were washed with

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

[image:2.612.65.301.65.263.2]
(3)

buffered saline and scraped into the same buffer. Cytoplas-micextracts wereprepared by suspending pelleted cells in 50

,u1 of reticulocyte standard buffer-1% Nonidet P-40 and

removing nuclei by centrifugation (26).

Proteins wereimmunoprecipitated by using 10 pul of

cyto-plasmic extract, 5 pul of immune rabbit serum, and 50 ,ul of 10% (wt/vol) formaldehyde-denatured staphylococcus

(Ig-Sorb;NewEngland Enzyme Center) as described previously

(2).

Proteins were fractionated in 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels,whichwere stained withCoomassie blue, impregnated withAutofluor (National Diagnostics), dried, and exposed to X-Omat AR film (Eastman Kodak Co.) with intensifying screensfor3 to 10 days.

Inpulse-chase experiments, polypeptides were labeled at

3 h posttransfection for 15 min, chased with 0.1 mM

unla-beled methionine for increasing amounts of time, and

ana-lyzed by immunoprecipitation asdescribed above.

Analysis of RNA by blot hybridization. For analysis of

intracellular RNAs by the slot blot technique, HeLa cell

cytoplasmic extracts, obtained as described above, were

denatured with an equal volume of22% formaldehyde-8x SSC (1x SSCis 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) at 65°C for 15 min. Samples were frozen at -70°C, thawed, and

centrifuged for 30 min in a Microfuge (Brinkmann

Instru-ments,Inc.).One-fifth ofeachdenatured sample was filtered

onto nitrocellulose paper by using a slot blot apparatus

(Schleicher & Schuell, Inc.). The filters were baked,

prehy-bridized, and hybridized as described previously (19). To

quantitatethehybridization, thefilter was cut and placed in

5 mlofOmniSolv (Fisher Scientific Co.) and the

radioactiv-itywascounted in aliquid scintillation counter.

For Northern blot (RNA blot) hybridization analysis,

total-cellRNAwas prepared by the guanidine

thiocyanate-CsCl technique (19), fractionated in 1%

agarose-formal-dehyde gels, and transferred to nitrocellulose paper and

hybridizedasdescribed previously (19).

Three different32P-labelednucleic acid probes were used. One was anegative-strand RNAcomplementary to

poliovi-rus virion RNA from the HindIlI site at nucleotide 6516

through the 3' end; it was transcribed by using SP6 RNA

polymeraseasdescribed previously(20)in reaction mixtures

containing three unlabeled nucleoside triphosphates and 50

,uCi of [32P]UTP (800 Ci/mmol; New England Nuclear

Corp.). The DNA template used was plasmid pSP65(3'17)

(17),linearized attheHindIll site. The second probe was a synthetic oligonucleotide

(5'-TAACAATGAGGTAATTCC-3')complementary tobases 711 to 728 ofP2/Lansing RNA,

labeled at the 5' end with [32P]ATP and polynucleotide

kinase (19). This oligonucleotide hybridizes to P2/Lansing but not P1/Mahoney RNA. The third probe was a double-stranded DNA labeledby random priming, using an

oligola-beling kit (Pharmacia). The cDNAfragment used extended

from a unique BglII site (nucleotide 5601) to the 3' end of

P1/Mahoney.

RESULTS

Replication of poliovirusRNAscontainingP1 deletions. As a first step in identifying genomic sequences required for

replicationofpoliovirusRNA,weasked whetherdeletion of

the P1 region of the genome, known to encode the viral

capsid proteins,hadaneffectonreplication.Toaddress this

question, in-framedeletions within P1 were introduced into

infectiousP1/MahoneycDNA. Three deletedplasmidswere

constructed, pT7R1, pT7R2, and pT7R3, containing

dele-tions of 2,317, 1,781, and 1,295 base pairs,respectively (Fig. 2).

To determine whether RNAs containing these deletions could replicate in HeLa cells, the plasmids were linearized

with EcoRI and transcribed in vitro by using T7 RNA

polymerase. The resulting transcripts were transfected into HeLa cells, and at various times posttransfection cytoplas-mic extracts were prepared and subjected to blot hybridiza-tion by the slot blot technique, using a negative-strand RNA probe representing the 3' end of P1/Mahoney. Transcripts from all three deleted plasmids(RI, R2, and R3) replicated in transfected cells, as shown by the increase in transcript levels beginning at 4 h posttransfection (Fig. 3). For com-parison, transcripts from the unaltered pT7PV1-5 and virion RNA weretransfected into HeLa cells (Fig. 3). Examination of the autoradiograph suggests that efficiency of replication is proportional to the size of the deletion. Quantitation of radioactivity on the filter by scintillation counting indicated that at 8 h posttransfection the ratio of RI, R2, R3, and PV1-5 RNAs was4:1.9:1.7:1.2. It is not possible to compare replication of these RNAs with that of virion RNA since far lessvirion RNA was transfected onto cells (300 ng versus 4 to5 ,ug for T7-derived RNAs).

To examine the size of RNAs produced in transfected cells, total cellular RNA prepared at different times post-transfection was subjected to Northern hybridization analy-sis. In cells transfected with Rl RNA, a transcript of the expected size (5.1 kilobases [kb]) was observed at 4 h posttransfection and increased in abundance dramatically by 8 h posttransfection (Fig. 4). Similar results were observed for cellstransfected with R2 and R3, except that the

appro-priate-size RNAs were detected (data not shown). The

nature of the larger RNA species that appeared at 8 h

posttransfection is not known, but it is clearly not a

cova-lently linked dimer that has been proposed to be an interme-diate in replication (1). Based on these results together with those shown in Fig. 3, it is clear that the 5.1-kb RNA Rl is able to replicate in cells without rearrangement of the RNA, such as further deletions or duplications. Thus, the subge-nomic RNAs are replicons that contain all the information required for RNA replication.

Protein synthesis in cells transfected with subgenomic rep-licons. Polypeptide synthesis in cells transfected with the subgenomic replicon Rl was examined to determine the nature and levels of poliovirus proteins that were synthe-sized. When cells were labeled with

[35S]methionine

4 h after transfection and fractionated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel

electrophoresis, it was not possible to detect virus-specific

proteins over the background of untransfected-cell polypep-tides (results not shown). Therefore, immunoprecipitations were performed using rabbit antiserum directed against a

trpE-3DPoI

fusionprotein expressed in E. coli (see Materials

and Methods). In extracts of virus-infected cells, this anti-serumdetected the polymerase

3DPo1,

its precursors P3 and 3CD, and alternate cleavage products 3C' and 3D' (Fig. 5, lane 6). In cellstransfected with replicon Rl, R2, or R3 or with the full-lengthtranscript PV1-5, the polymerase precur-sor 3CD was detected (Fig. 5, lanes 1 to 3 and 5). Overex-posureofFig. 5 revealed the presence of

3DPo1,

3C', and 3D' (results not shown).

The amount of 3CD observed in

Ri-transfected

cells was greater than that found inR2-and R3-transfected cells, and the levels of this precursor in all three replicon-transfected cell groups exceeded that observed in PV1-5-transfected cells. Theseobservations areconsistent with the RNA levels shown in Fig. 3.

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

(4)

Kb 0

5'

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

VPg AUG

==F ... 3 Doliovlrion Tw w * * '~~~~~~~. -- {.- v

s N ,°0 Ow%DE 0O %D RNA

r-o% p- I ) 00 )l 0 o%.

N1 to I0l I

U)IfIV)

UV)

=

--i~poliovirus

proteins

VP4 VP2 VP3 VP1 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 3D

BglII Hind III

BamHi Nru I Nhe I SnaBI I Hind Hind PYUII Eco

*I . lii .v I

1174 2470 2956 5601 6056 65167055J1

747 3065

1175 2956 1175 2470

)RI

poliovirus cDNA

pT7 PY1 -5 pT7R1 pT7R2 pT7R3

FIG. 2. Location of deletions in poliovirus cDNAs. The poliovirus processing map is shown at the top. Cleavage sites for mature polypeptides and restriction enzymescorrespondto the nucleotide positions in Pl/Mahoney RNA (13, 24). Restriction sites used in the constructions,aswell as thoseusedtolinearizetheplasmids for in vitroRNAsynthesis wereEcoRI(E),PvuII(P),Hindlll(H),BgIII(B), NheI(N), SnaBI (S), andNruI(N). Thesolid arrowheads on the left represent the T7 promoter.

The kinetics ofprocessing ofthe P2region was examined

by pulse-chase studies. In these experiments, cells were labeled with [35S]methionine at 4 h posttransfection and chased with cold methionine for different amounts oftime and

celi

extracts were prepared and immunoprecipitated with either anti-2APro or anti-2C serum.

Polypeptide 2APro was identified in virus-infected cells

(Fig. 6, lanes 8 to 14)and in Rl-transfected cells (lanes 1 to

7)by immunoprecipitation with anti-2APro serum. Itis clear

that 2APrO from Rl-transfected cells is the same size as its

2- -2

RI 4- 6PVI5

RS6

-

~

6PV-L8-

8]

r2-

-27

R2

[-

2vRNA

6

I

6- -86

~

-2-

-27

R3 4- -4 Mock

6- ~ 6

8-

~-FIG. 3. Slot blotanalysisofpoliovirusRNAintransfected HeLa cells. Cytoplasmic extracts of transfected HeLa cells were dena-tured withformaldehyde-SSC, slot blotted on nitrocellulose paper, andhybridized withanegative-strand RNAprobe representing the 3'end ofPl/MahoneyRNA. Extracts wereprepared at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hposttransfection from mock-transfected cells or cells transfected withreplicon Rl, R2, orR3,full-length in vitro transcriptPV1-5, or 300ng of virion RNA(vRNA1).

counterpart in virus-infected cells, and it appears to turn over rapidly in both instances. Apparently the absence of mostofthecapsid polypeptides did not prevent cleavage of theTyr-Gly bond between P1 and P2.Anti-2APro serumalso immunoprecipitated other viral proteins from infected and transfected cells, most likely because of the presence of

contaminating antigens in the 2APro preparation used to

generatetheantiserum(Fig. 6). For example, itwaspossible toidentify capsid polypeptides VP1, VP2, and VP3 in virus-infected extracts (forexample, lane 12); as expected, these polypeptides were not present in cells transfected with Rl (lanes 1 to 7). When the same cytoplasmic extracts were immunoprecipitatedwithanti-2Cserum, polypeptide 2Cwas

Hour post-transfection

M 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 kb

.Wmm3

-7.5

- 5

FIG. 4. Northern blot analysis of RNA from Rl-transfected HeLacells. At 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 haftertransfection of HeLa cellswith Rl,total cellular RNA wasprepared,fractionated in a1%agarose-formaldehyde gel,andblotted onto nitrocellulose. An SP6-transcribed 32P-labeled negative-strand RNA was used as theprobe. LaneM, RNA from mock-transfected cells.

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

[image:4.612.128.505.63.313.2] [image:4.612.119.254.498.643.2] [image:4.612.376.518.515.660.2]
(5)

1 2 3 4 5 6 PV RI R2 R3 M 1-5VI

7 VI

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT 12 3 14 15 16

RI VI

0 15 30 4560 75 90 05 30 45 60 7590 1-M

3CD 33D -2BC -VP2

VPI

VP3 a

gi; -2A

-2A

FIG. 5. 3DPoI-related polypeptides induced after transfection

with subgenomic replicons Ri, R2, and R3. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of[35S]methionine-labeledimmunoprecipitatesfrom cytoplasmic extracts of transfected HeLa cells was performed. Anti-trpE-3DP1I antibody was used. Extracts were prepared from cells transfected with Ri (lane 1), R2 (lane 2), or R3 (lane 3), mock-transfected cells (lane 4), PV1-5RNA-transfected cells (lane 5),andP1/Mahoney-infectedcells(lane6). Lane 7, [35S]methionine-labeled, total cytoplasmic extract of P1/Mahoney-infected HeLa cells.

identified invirus-infected and Rl-transfected cells (Fig. 7).

As reported previously (3), this antiserum also

immunopre-cipitates other viral proteins. In contrast to the rapid

turn-overof2APro, 2C and its precursor 2BCwere verystable in

both virus-infectedand Rl-transfected cells.

A polypeptide unique to Rl-transfected cells was ob-servedinanti-2APro immunoprecipitatesattimezero(Fig.6,

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1213 14 15 16

RI VI

0 15 30 45 60 75 90 015 3045 60 7590tH M

-3CD

-3D -28C

_ VP0

VP

3 2C

-YP2/3D' _ -VP3

3,

-2A

FIG. 6. 2APro-related polypeptidesin cellstransfected with Ri.

HeLacellsweretransfected with Ri orinfected withP1/Mahoney (V1), labeled 3 h later with[35S]methioninefor 15 min, and chased withcoldmethionine for 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75 min. Cytoplasmic

extracts were prepared, immunoprecipitated with 2APr'

anti-body, and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Lanes 1to7,extractsfromcells transfected withRi and chased for the times (minutes) indicated; lanes 8 to 14, virus-infected cells

chasedforthetimes(minutes) indicated; lane 15, mock-transfected cells; lane 16, cytoplasmic extract from [35S]methionine-labeled, virus-infected cells. The arrow indicates a polypeptide unique to

[image:5.612.104.246.71.252.2]

Rl-transfectedcells, observed attimezero

FIG. 7. 2C-relatedpolypeptidesincells transfectedwithRi.The proceduresandlanesarethe same as those described in thelegend to Fig. 6, except thatanti-2C antibody was used for immunoprecip-itation.

lane 1, arrow). Thispolypeptideis unstable, since itwas not observed after a 15-min chase (lane 2). A polypeptide of similar molecular weightwas immunoprecipitated from the same extracts by using anti-VP1 serum (data not shown). These results, coupled with the molecular weight of the

polypeptide, suggest that it consists of 105 amino acids of

VP1 presentin theRlgenomelinkedto2ABbythe Tyr-Gly cleavage site. Cleavage of this bond by2APro liberates 2AB and the VP1 fragment, which was not detected (data not shown).

These experiments indicate that proteolytic cleavages in the polyprotein encoded by Rl appear to be normal. Whether the rates ofcleavage were affected (e.g., by the

different conformation of precursors causedby the P1

dele-tion)was notdetermined. Thisquestioncould be addressed

by comparing Rl-transfected and PV1-5-transfected cells;

however, the levels of polypeptides in PV1-5-transfected

cellswereextremely low (Fig. 5, lane5).

Subgenomic replicons interfere with replication of full-length poliovirus RNA. Naturally occurring poliovirus DI

particles, generated after deletions ofno morethan 20% of

the capsid sequences (18), interfere with the replication of

standard particles by competing for the cellular machinery andforviral capsids(5, 6). To determine whetherRi could

interfere with the replication ofwild-type RNA, Ri RNA

was cotransfected into HeLa cells with P2/Lansing RNA

extracted from virions.Samples ofthemediumweretakenat

different times posttransfection, and the amount of

infec-tious virus present was determined by plaque assay. As a

control,RlRNAproduced by linearizingthe DNAtemplate

withPvuII (which cleaves in the carboxy-terminal region of

3DP01

[nucleotide 7055])was cotransfected withP2/Lansing virion RNA. Cotransfection

with

Ri

hadonly aslight effect on virus yield and the development of cytopathic effect

(CPE) (Fig. 8). Unexpectedly, cotransfection with Rl-PvuII

reduced virus yields by 2

log1o

PFU and, furthermore,

significantly delayed the development of CPE.

The interference phenomenon wasfurther investigated in a plaque size reduction assay. In this experiment, a fixed amount of type 1 virion RNA (100 pg) was cotransfected with various amounts ofsubgenomic replicons (10, 5, 2.5,

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

[image:5.612.322.550.72.263.2] [image:5.612.57.296.435.614.2]
(6)

E

C

IL

0

10

-

8-6

4

|

T2

2 -*- T2+R1

41- T2+Rl-Pvull

0~~~~~

0 100 20

Time (Hrs) 30

CPE:

T2 + ++ ++++

T2+R1 - ++ ++++

T 2+R1-Pvull - - - ++

FIG. 8. Effectof cotransfectionongrowthof poliovirusinHeLa

cells. HeLa cells were transfectedwith 500 ngof poliovirustype2 virion RNA (T2), cotransfected with 500 ng of poliovirus type 2 virion RNA and one-fifth ofapT7R1transcription reaction mixture

(T2 + R1),orcotransfectedwith 500ngofpoliovirus type2virion

RNAandone-fifth ofapT7R1-PvuII transcription reaction mixture (T2+R1-PvuII). Samples of cell mediumweretakenat4,8,20,and

30 h posttransfection, and virus titers were determined by plaque assay. CPE was estimated for each time point: -, no change;

+ + + +,totalCPE.

and 1 ,ul of a T7 RNA synthesis reaction mixture as

de-scribed in Materials and Methods) and the cells were

incu-batedunder an agaroverlay. Plaque sizewas reduced when

2.5,ulormoreof R1-PvuII RNAwascotransfected(Fig. 9A; compare withthevirion RNA control [vRNA1] in Fig. 9B).

Incontrast,plaque sizewasreducedonlyslightly when 10

RI

ofRl RNA wascotransfected (Fig. 9A). RNA produced by

linearization of pT7R1 with HindIII (which cleaves in the amino-terminal region of 3DPoI) or BgII (which cleaves in

3CPro) did not reduce plaque size in cotransfections (Fig. 9A). Cotransfection withreplicons R2 and R3 did notcause

plaque size reduction (Fig. 9B); however, R2-PvuII and R3-PvuII displayed theinhibitory phenotype(Fig. 9B). Sub-genomicreplicons terminatingatthe PvuIIsite alsoreduced the plaque size when cotransfected with P2/Lansing virion RNA (results not shown).

IntracellularRNAs were examined in cotransfected cells

to determine themolecular basis for the inhibition of polio-virus replication by R1-PvuII. For this analysis we used a

P2/Lansing-specific oligonucleotide (see Materials and Methods) which did not hybridize with poliovirus type 1 RNA. Cytoplasmicextractswerepreparedatdifferent times posttransfection, applied to nitrocellulose in a slot blot

format, and hybridized to a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide

probe. No hybridization was observed in cytoplasmic

ex-tracts from cells transfected with Rl or R1-PvuII alone,

whereasreplication ofP2/Lansing virion RNA (vRNA2)was

easily detected (Fig. 10). Replication oftype 2 RNA was

inhibited 2-fold by cotransfection with Rl and 10-fold by cotransfection with R1-PvuII. In a similar assay, R1-PvuII was shown to interfere with the replication of Ri, R2, R3, PV1-5,andP1/Mahoney viral RNA (datanotshown). These results indicate thatthe subgenomic replicons in some way

interfere with viral RNAsynthesis.

Togaininsight intotheinhibition phenomenon, westudied

in detail RNA and proteins in cells cotransfected with R1-PvuII andP2/Lansing virionRNA. Atvarioustimesafter

transfection, using duplicate cell monolayers, total cellular

RNA was prepared for Northern hybridization, and cells werelabeled with[35S]methionine foranalysis of proteins. A 7.5-kb poliovirus RNA was detected 4 and 8 h after

trans-fectionwithvirionRNA(Fig. 11,lanes 2and3). When virion

RNA wascotransfected withR1-PvuII, the amount of 7.5-kb RNA was slightly reduced at 4 h posttransfection and more reduced at 8 h (lanes 5 and 6). In cells transfected with R1-PvuII only, a faint smear beginning at 5.1 kb and extend-ingtoward thebottom of the gel was detected (lanes 7 to 12; lanes 10 to 12 are a long exposure of lanes 7 to 9) which probably represents inputRNA.

Immunoprecipitation analysis of [35S]methionine-labeled extractswith

anti-trpE-3DPO'

serumrevealed the presence of the precursor 3CD at 4 and 8 h aftertransfection with type 2 virion RNA (Fig. 12, lanes 4 and 5). When virion RNA was cotransfected with R1-PvuII, the amount of 3CD observed was similar at 4 h but clearly reduced at 8 hposttransfection (lanes 7 and 8). Anadditional replicase-related polypeptide

slightly smaller than 3CD was observed in cotransfected

cells (lane 8, arrowhead). This polypeptidemight be the 3CD

polypeptide encoded by the R1-PvuII genome, which is

expected to lack 105 C-terminal amino acids. In support of thisconclusion is the observation of a similar polypeptide 8 h after transfection with R1-PvuII only (lane 11 arrowhead). Acurious observation was the presence of a 45,000-dalton

3DPoI-related polypeptide in all cells 2 h after transfection

(Fig. 12, lanes 3, 6, and 9). A polypeptide ofthis size has beenobserved during invitro translationofpoliovirus RNA inreticulocyte lysates and has been identified as a product of internal initiation (8). It is not known whether the polypep-tide observed here originates from internal initiation. It should be noted, however, that synthesis of the 45,000-dalton polypeptide is not associated with the inhibitory phenotype, because the polypeptide was also present in HeLaextracts transfected only with poliovirus virion RNA (lane 3).

DISCUSSION

Early studies indicated that the genome ofpoliovirus DI particles may contain a maximum deletion of 15 to 20%of the viral genome (7, 18). Analysis of DI-particle RNA structure showed that the deletions werelocated inthe area of the genome encoding the capsid polypeptides, approxi-mately 1,300 to 3,100basesfrom the 5' endoftheviral RNA (21). Sequence analysis ofDI-particle RNA enabledprecise location of the deletions, which occurred between nucleo-tides 1226 and 2705, with a size distribution of4.2 to 13.2% (15). Here we showthat asubgenomicrepliconcontaining a deletion of nearly the entire P1 region (nucleotide 747 to nucleotide 3065), comprising 31.2% of the genome, can replicate in HeLacells. Why thenaretheextentandlocation ofP1 deletions restricted in naturally occurring DI-particle RNA? One possibilityis that for theDI-particle RNAs tobe encapsidated into virions, a specific packaging signal in the P1 region must be conserved. Alternately, there may be a minimum amount ofviral RNA that canbepackaged intothe poliovirus capsid. To address these possibilities, it will be necessary to determine whether thereplicons reported here can be packaged into virions.

When Rl RNA and virion RNAwere mixed and transfec-ted into HeLa cells, replication of the virion RNA was inhibited. More surprising was the finding that an Rl tran-script truncated at a PvuII site within

3DPo1

was able to interfere significantly with wild-type viral replication.

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

[image:6.612.62.300.71.298.2]
(7)

A

RI

Rl-Pvu

E

RI-Hind

I

RI-Bgl

I

B

R 2

R2-PvuI

R 3

R

3

-

Pvu]

5I1

LI

I

I

vRNAI

I

__

.

_

__

__r.

..

__

__

[image:7.612.95.512.48.671.2]

1

l

mock

FIG. 9. Plaque size reductionassay. HeLa cells were cotransfected withpoliovirus type 1 virion RNA (100 pg) and different amounts of

aT7RNAtranscription reaction mixture(10, 5, 2.5, or 1,ul). (A)Rl,R1-PvulI,Rl-Hindlll,andR1-BglIIwere produced bytranscription of pT7R1linearized withEcoRI, PvulI, HindlIl,orBglll.respectively. (B) R2 andR2-PvuIIwere produced by transcription of pT7R2 linearized withEcoRIorPvuII,respectively; R3 andR3-PvuIIwere produced by transcription of pT7R3 linearized with EcoRI orPvuII,respectively. Mock-transfected cellsorcellstransfectedwith 100 pg of poliovirus type 1 virion RNA(vRNA1)are also shown.

1693

I

IN

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

(8)

R4-Rl1

6-

L8- 4-RI-PvuU

6-

M8o-4 -Mock 6 -

L8--4 vRNA2

-6 +

-mm 8] R

-4 vRNA2

-6 +

-8 RI-PvuE

-i

_M -6 vRNA2

mm -8

FIG. 10. Inhibition of poliovirus type 2RNAreplication. HeLa cellsweretransfected withpoliovirus type2virion RNA(vRNA2), Rl, orR1-PvuII, mock transfected (M),orcotransfected with type 2poliovirus virionRNA and Rl (vRNA2+R1) orR1-PvuII(vRNA2

+Rl-PvuII).Cytoplasmicextracts werepreparedat2, 4, 6, and8 h posttransfection, denatured with formaldehyde-SSC, slot blotted onto nitrocellulose paper, and hybridized with a type 2-specific oligonucleotide.

PvuII RNA inhibited the replication of type 1 and type 2

poliovirus, aswell as thatof the threesubgenomic replicons

Ri,R2, and R3. Theabilityof Rl-PvuII to inhibit viral RNA

and protein synthesis during a single round ofreplication

indicates that transfected cells had taken up both RNAs.

Inhibition of viral replication did not occur at the level of

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

vRNA2

± C

.:

_-K_

vRNA2 RI-Pvuf RI-PvuIl

- 2 4 8 2 4 8 2 4 8 VI V2

-- 3CD

- - 3D

-3C

- 3D

FIG. 12. Analysis of polypeptides in cotransfected HeLacells. HeLacells were transfectedwithdifferent RNAs, andat2, 4, and 8 h posttransfection cells were labeled with [35S]methionine and cytoplasmic extracts were prepared and immunoprecipitated with anti-trpE-3DPoI serum. Immunoprecipitates were fractionated by electrophoresis on SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Lane 1, Uninfected celllysate without immunoprecipitation; lane 2, immunoprecipitate of uninfected cells; lanes 3 to 11, extracts from transfectedcells; lanes 12 and 13, immunoprecipitates of type 1-and type 2-virus-infected extracts,respectively.The arrowheadsareexplained inthe text.

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1I

12 13

14

15

vRNA2

vRNA2 RI-PvulE

2 4 8 2 4 8 2 4

....

_ .,.

RI-Pvu

8 24 8

S f

4**

b

:.

FIG. 11. Northern blotanalysisof RNAsincotrar

cells.HeLa cellsweretransfected with different RNA and 8hposttransfectiontotal-cell RNAwasprepared

toNorthern blotanalysis, using aDNAprobe repre

end ofpoliovirusvirion RNA. Lanes 10to12arealor

lanes 7to9. Lane13,Mock-transfected cell RNA. La 32P-labeledtranscriptsof Rl-PvuII andPV1-5. vRNA virion RNA.

M entry of RNA into the cell. Thisconclusion is supported by

the observation that therewas noreduction in the size and

> LO number ofplaques on cells cotransfected with virion RNA

Q_ and up to 10 ,ul of Rl-HindIII or

R1-BglII

(Fig. 9). In

± > cotransfection experiments,viralRNA

synthesis

was

inhib-- CL itedbeginningat6hposttransfection, andprotein synthesis

was reduced 2 h later. These results suggest that the inhibi-tion occurs atlate stages in the viral replication cycle.

What is the mechanism ofinhibition ofpoliovirus replica-tion by R1-PvuII? One possibility is that thedeleted

repli-caseand/or itsprecursorsarepotent inhibitors because

they

interactstronglywithviral RNA or hostfactorsand prevent

interaction with the wild-type polymerase. This possibility

seemsunlikelybecauseeveniftruncated 3CD(Fig. 12,lanes 8 and 11) is

produced,

it is made in small amounts at 8 h

postinfection, bywhichtimethereissignificantinhibition of

viral RNA andprotein synthesis.Asecondpossibilityis that the PvuII end of the interfering RNAs represents a strong replicase-binding site that sequesters the active replicase, other viral proteins, or host factors. Such a mechanism

might explain our observation that inhibition was caused

specifically byRlRNAsendingatthe PvuIIsite in3DP01 and

nsfectedHeLa not by RNAs terminating at other sites in the 3' end of the

andsubjected genome.However,there isnoevidence that

Rl-PvuII

isable

asenting

the 3' to

replicate

in transfected

cells,

and therefore the inhibition

ng

exposureof would have to be mediated

by

input

Rl-PvuII

RNAs. Fi-nes14 and15, nally, it is possible that the

Rl-PvuII

RNA, by virtue of its

Q2,P2/Lansing structure,inducesacellular antiviral

activity.

It isnot

likely

thatinterferonplaysarole in theinhibition for thefollowing

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

[image:8.612.100.268.68.234.2] [image:8.612.324.558.71.306.2] [image:8.612.64.302.418.644.2]
(9)

reasons. (i)Wild-type poliovirus isnotonlyapoorinducer of

interferon (11) but is relatively resistant to this antiviral

agent (unpublished results). (ii) The trans-acting inhibition was observed in cotransfected cells during the first round of

replication (Fig. 10 to 12). It is possible, however, that

interferon acts in subsequent infection cycles in

cotrans-fected cells, contributing to the delay in the appearance of

CPE andtothe reductionof viral titers and plaque size (Fig.

8 and9). (iii) The trans-actinginhibition is sequence

depen-dent, because it was induced by R1-PvuII but not by

Rl-HindlIl and R1-BglII, which differ at their 3' ends.

R1-PvuII mayactivateaspecificnucleasein transfectedcells

thatdegrades viral RNAs. Posttranscriptional regulation of

gene expression by control of mRNA stability has been

demonstrated for certainlymphokines, cytokines,and

proto-oncogenes (9, 14, 27) and seems to be ageneral regulatory mechanism. A labile nuclease, different from the

well-char-acterized RNase Lactivated in interferon-treated cells, has

been suggested to mediate the specific mRNA shutoff (28).

Furtherinvestigation ofthe mechanism ofR1-PvuII

inhibi-tion may distinguish between these possibilities and

eluci-date processes that are masked in wild-type-virus-infected cells.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

WethankD. Baltimore for antiserato2C and2APro, E.Wimmer forpT7PV1-5, N. LaMonica forpSV20[PVsma39],andC. Mendel-sohnforpSV20[PVsma39dl5B].

This workwassupported by Public Health ServicegrantAI-20017 from theNational Institute ofAllergy and Infectious Diseases and byagrantfromtheSearle Scholars Program.V.R.R.istherecipient ofanI. T. HirschlCareer Scientist Award.

LITERATURE CITED

1. Andrews, N. C., D. Levin, and D. Baltimore. 1985. Poliovirus replicase stimulation by terminal uridylyl transferase. J. Biol. Chem. 260:7628-7635.

2. Baron,M. H., and D. Baltimore. 1982. Antibodiesagainstthe chemically synthesized genome-linked protein of poliovirus reactwith native virus-specificproteins. Cell 28:395-404. 3. Bernstein, H. D., N.Sonenberg, and D.Baltimore. 1985.

Polio-virusmutantthat does notselectively inhibit host cell protein synthesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:2913-2923.

4. Cole, C. N., and D. Baltimore. 1973. Defective interfering particles ofpoliovirus. II.Natureof the defect.J.Mol. Biol.76: 325-343.

5. Cole, C. N., and D. Baltimore. 1973. Defective interfering particles of poliovirus. III. Interference and enrichment.J.Mol. Biol. 76:345-361.

6. Cole, C. N., and D. Baltimore. 1973. Defective interfering particles ofpoliovirus. IV.Mechanismsof enrichment.J.Virol. 12:1414-1426.

7. Cole, C.N., D. Smoler, E. Wimmer, and D. Baltimore. 1971. Defective interfering particles of poliovirus. 1. Isolation and physicalproperties. J. Virol.7:478-485.

8. Dorner, A. J., B. L. Semler, R. J. Jackson, R. Hanecak, E. Duprey,and E. Wimmer.1984.In vitrotranslation ofpoliovirus RNA:utilization of internal initiation sites inreticulocytelysate. J.Virol. 50:507-514.

9. Grabstein, K., S. Dower, S. Gillis, D. Urdal, and A. Larsen. 1986. Expression of interleukin 2, interferon--y, and the IL2 receptorbyhumanperipherialbloodlymphocytes.J.Immunol. 136:4503-4508.

10. Hanahan,D.1983.Studiesontransformation of Escherichiacoli with plasmids.J. Mol. Biol. 166:557-580.

11. Ho, M. 1973. Animal virus andinterferonformation, p. 34-36. InN. B.Finter(ed.),Interferon and interferoninducers.

North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.

12. Kaplan, G., J. Lubinski, A. Dasgupta, and V. R. Racaniello. 1985. In vitro synthesis of infectious poliovirus RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:8424-8428.

13. Kitamura, N., B. L.Semler,P. G.Rothberg, G. R.Larsen,C.J. Adler,A.J. Dorner,E. A.Emini,R.Hanecak, J.J. Lee,S.van

der Werf, C. W. Anderson, and E. Wimmer. 1981. Primary structure, gene organization and polypeptide expression of poliovirus RNA. Nature(London)291:547-553.

14. Kronke, M., W.J. Leonard, J.M. Depper, and W. C. Green. 1985. Sequential expression of genes involved in human T lymphocyte growthanddifferentiation.J. Exp. Med. 161:1593-1598.

15. Kuge, S., I. Saito, and A. Nomoto. 1986. Primary structureof poliovirus defective-interfering particle genomes and possible generation mechanism of the particles. J. Mol. Biol. 192:473-487.

16. LaMonica, N.,C.Meriam,and V. R.Racaniello.1986.Mapping of sequences requiredfor mouse neurovirulence ofpoliovirus type 2Lansing. J.Virol. 57:515-525.

17. Lubinski, J. M.,G.Kaplan,V.R.Racaniello,and A.Dasgupta. 1986. Mechanism of in vitro synthesis of covalently linked dimericRNAmoleculesbythepoliovirus replicase.J.Virol.58: 459-467.

18. Lundquist, R. E., M. Sullivan, and J. V. Maizel, Jr. 1979. Characterizationofanewisolateofpoliovirusdefective inter-fering particles. Cell 18:759-769.

19. Maniatis, T., E. F.Fritsch,andJ. Sambrook.1982. Molecular cloning:alaboratory manual. ColdSpringHarborLaboratory, ColdSpringHarbor,N.Y.

20. Melton, D. A., P. A.Krieg. M. R.Rebagliati, T. Maniatis, K. Zinn, and M. R. Green. 1984. Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:7035-7056.

21. Nomoto, A.,A.Jacobson,Y. F.Lee,J. Dunn,and E. Wimmer. 1979. Defective interfering particlesofpoliovirus: mapping of deletionsand evidence that the deletions inthe genomes of DI (1), (2)and(3)arelocated in thesameregion.J. Mol.Biol. 128: 179-196.

22. Omata, T.,H. Horie,S.Kuge,N.Imura,and A. Nomoto.1986. MappingandsequencingofRNAswithoutrecourse to molecu-lar cloning: application to RNAs of the Sabin 1 strain of poliovirusanditsdefectiveinterfering particles.J. Biochem.99: 207-217.

23. Racaniello,V. R. 1984.PoliovirustypeIlproducedfrom cloned cDNAis infectiousinmice. VirusRes. 1:669-675.

24. Racaniello,V.R.,and D.Baltimore. 1981.Molecularcloningof polioviruscDNAanddetermination ofthecompletenucleotide sequenceofthe viral genome. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA78: 4887-4891.

25. Racaniello, V. R., and D. Baltimore. 1981. Cloned poliovirus complementary DNAisinfectious in mammaliancells.Science 214:916-919.

26. Racaniello,V.R.,andC. Meriam.1986.Poliovirus temperature-sensitive mutantcontaininga singlenucleotide deletion in the 5'-noncoding region ofthe viral RNA.Virology 155:498-507. 27. Reed, J. C., J.D.Alpers,P.C.Nowell,and R.G. Hoover. 1986.

Sequential expression of protooncogenes during lectin-stimu-lated mitogenesis ofnormal human lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA83:3982-3986.

28. Reeves, R., T. S. Elton, M. S. Nissen, D. Lehn, and K. R. Johnson. 1987. Posttranscriptionalgene regulationandspecific bindingof the nonhistoneproteinHMG-Ibythe 3' untranslated region of bovine interleukin 2 cDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA84:6531-6535.

29. Sarnow, P.,H. D. Bernstein, andD.Baltimore. 1986. A polio-virustemperature-sensitiveRNA synthesismutantlocatedina

noncoding regionof the genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:571-575.

30. Spindler,K.R.,D.S.E.Rosser,and A.J.Berk. 1984.Analysis ofadenovirustransforming proteinsfromearlyregions 1Aand 1B with antisera to inducible fusion antigens produced in

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

(10)

Escherichia coli. J. Virol. 49:132-141.

31. Tanese, N., M. Roth, and S. P. Goff. 1985. Expression of enzymatically active reverse transcriptase in Escherichia coli. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:4944-4948.

32. Ticehurst, J.R., V.R.Racaniello, B. M. Baroudy, D. Baltimore, R. H.Purcell, andS. M. Feinstone. 1983. Molecular cloning and characterization ofhepatitis A virus cDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad.

Sci. USA 80:5885-5889.

33. Vaheri,A., and J. S. Pagano. 1965. Infectious poliovirus RNA:

asensitivemethod ofassay.Virology27:435-436.

34. Van DerWerf,S., J. Bradley, E. Wimmer, F. W. Studier, and J.J. Dunn. 1986. Synthesis ofinfectious poliovirus RNA by purifiedT7 RNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 2330-2334.

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Figure

FIG.1.acidmid. Construction of a trpE-replicase fusion expression plas- The poliovirus processing map is shown at the top
FIG. 2.constructions,NheIpolypeptides Location of deletions in poliovirus cDNAs. The poliovirus processing map is shown at the top
FIG. 6.extractsbody,(V1),cells;withthechasedvirus-infectedRl-transfectedHeLaLanes 2APro-related polypeptides in cells transfected with Ri
FIG.8.cells.assay.RNAvirionvirion(T2(T230+ + h Effect of cotransfection on growth of poliovirus in HeLa HeLa cells were transfected with 500 ng of poliovirus type 2 RNA (T2), cotransfected with 500 ng of poliovirus type 2 RNA and one-fifth of a pT7R1 trans
+3

References

Related documents

The late assembly domain (L-domain) of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) or human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) could also fully or partially restore M-MuLV assembly when introduced

Glycoprotein G-2 (gG-2) of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is a viral envelope protein with a feature unique among HSV proteins in the form of cleavage of the gG-2 precursor

MMTV insertion sites from tumors of infected mice, we intro- duced a bacterial supF suppressor tRNA gene into the LTR of the MMTV(C3H) hyb provirus (33).. This supF gene carries its

The current method of providing total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is by grading up over a period of 5-7 days. However this may not be helpful in giving adequate calories in the

enlarged prostate with hypointense lesion seen involving both peripheral & central zone without capsular breech diffusely increased vasculrity carcinoma prostate.

For human immuno- deficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), we have published an RNA secondary structure model based on biochemical analysis, free energy minimization, and sequence comparison

Because the cDNA plasmid (12), containing the EBV R transactivator gene in an does not extend to the 5' end of the RNA, the possibility that SV40 expression vector, served as a

To test whether the region flanking the mapped 5' end of the 1.5-kb late IE-2 RNA contains a functional promoter, a 153-nt SacI-ClaI fragment comprising a DNA sequence of 78 nt