• No results found

Comparative study on Cutting diathermy Versus Scalpel incision in elective midline abdominal surgeries

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Comparative study on Cutting diathermy Versus Scalpel incision in elective midline abdominal surgeries"

Copied!
116
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Figure

Figure 1 :  MONOPOLAR DIATHERMY
Fig.2 :  BIPOLAR DIATHERMY
Fig.3 :  CONTINUOUS MODE
Fig. 4 INTERRUPTED MODE
+7

References

Related documents

This is to certify that the dissertation titled “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXTERIORISED VERSUS INSITU REPAIR OF UTERINE INCISION AT CESAREAN DELIVERY ” is a bonafide

To study the incidence, risk factors and causative organisms causing surgical site infections in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries in the Department of

“ INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS IN ELECTIVE ABDOMINAL SURGERIES ’’.. During his course

March 2017 Volume 6 Issue 3 Page 950 International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology Patil VB et al Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017 Mar;6(3)

Method : 50 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomized to undergo Tap block with Ropivacaine (n=25) or Bupivacaine

In conclusion continuous mass closure with vickyl suture is commonly used for abdominal fascial closure following elective midline laparotomy at Bugando Medical Centre and it

In patients undergoing elective as well as emergency laparotomy using a midline incision retention suturing has a distinct advantage of requiring less time for wound

Comparative study of abdominal wound dehiscence in continuous versus interrupted fascial closure after emergency midline