• No results found

GMOs: the wisdom of crowds & the folly of deregulation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "GMOs: the wisdom of crowds & the folly of deregulation"

Copied!
36
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Grenfell Tower, image source: Kentish, 2017

GMOs:

(2)

GMOs:

the wisdom of crowds &

the folly of deregulation

Dr John Paull

[email protected]

image source: Kentish, 2017

Parliamentary Forum:

GMOs: Regulation or Deregulation

Parliament House

Canberra

(3)

Parliament of Australia, 2019.

These regulations:

*

water down the definition of GMOs

*

have Australia

going it alone in the world

* risk damaging Australian food and agriculture

(4)

<cane toads>

CANE TOADS

Pest

Invasive species

Bad Science

SMH, 2019, Weber, 2010

(5)

New York Times, 2017

Bad

(6)

This is the biggest threat

to food and agriculture

that we have ever faced

Feedback…

(7)

It is a totally daft idea

Feedback…

(8)

World GMOs (ha)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Australia

Rest World

99.6%

0.4%

(9)

Australian GMOs (ha)

data sources: ABCA, 2019, ABS, 2018, Cotton Australia, 2019

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

GMO Agriculture

Non-GMO Agriculture

99.8%

(10)

GM-free is important

0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

Netherlands

UK

Belgium

Australia

Japan

Canada

USA

Argentina

Germany

South Korea

Brazil

France

Russia

Spain

Italy

Mexico

China

60%

49%

49%

45%

45%

45%

45%

43%

43%

41%

37%

37%

36%

33%

32%

31%

28%

data source: GfK, 2017; n=23,000

(11)

Wuhan, China, photo: J Paull

(12)

Australian Agriculture (ha)

data sources: ABCA, 2019, ABS, 2018, Cotton Australia, 2019, Willer & Lernoud, 2019

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

GMO Ag

Organic Ag

Rest Ag

91%

(13)

Australian Supermarkets

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

GMO Food

Non-GMO Food

100%

(14)

World Organics (ha)

Willer & Lernoud, 2019, Paull, 2019a

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

Australia

Rest World

49%

51%

* Zero tolerance for GMOs

(15)

OGTR oversight of GMOs

Office of the Gene Technology Regulator

Withdrawn

Rejected

Approved

0

40

80

120

160

155

0

12

167 Applications (2001-2019)

(16)

Number of GM trial sites with rogue canola plants 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Apr 2001 Feb 2002 Oct 2002 Jun 2003 Feb 2004 Oct 2004

Oct/Nov 2005

May 2006

Jan/Feb 2007

Oct 2007 May 2008

Feb/Mar 2009

Nov 2009 May 2010 Feb 201

1

Nov 201

1

May 2012

March 2013

Nov 2013 May 2014 May 2015

Feb/Mar 2016 44 28 19 23 17 13 18 22 2928 24 29 5 12 15 9 121213 8 10 12 10 8 13 9 19 10

6 7 7 9

4 4 3 4 4 16 3 1 6 6 8 6

Rogue GMOs in Tasmania - 2 decades

(17)

Community

Attitudes %

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Not safe

Don't Know

Safe

10%

22%

68%

Australians say GMOs “not safe”

(18)

Price per tonne

A$450

A$475

A$500

A$525

A$550

A$575

2014/15

2015/16

2016/17

2017/18

2018/19

Non GM canola (Albany)

Non GM canola (Kwinana)

GM canola (Albany)

GM canola (Kwinana)

data source: CBH,2019, graph: Paull, 2019b

Price Penalty for GM Canola = 7.2%

(19)

Canola

Grade

Marketing

Description

Specified Characteristics

Fair

Description

CAN

“Non GM

Canola”

“Certified GM free to Maximum adventitious presence of 0.9%

GMO. Suitable for Human Consumption and Biodiesel production.

ISCC EU Certified”.

Canola with

GM

contamination

0.9%

CAG

“Canola”

“Suitable for Human Consumption and Biodiesel production. ISCC

EU Certified”.

GM Canola

Ghost GMOs in WA

(20)

GM Canola W

A

%

10% 15% 20% 25%

2014

2015

2016

2017

19%

24%

23%

18%

GM canola in WA % - decline

(21)

Cotton (Hectares)

0 ha 100,000 ha 200,000 ha 300,000 ha 400,000 ha 500,000 ha 600,000 ha

1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/1

1

201

1/12

2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19

GMO cotton - Australia - erratic

(22)

The lie that underpins the GMO industry:

Regulators

same

Patent Office

“novel, unique,

different

, a real invention”

Substantial Equivalence

(23)

Baxter

GMO

900 ha

Marsh

Organic

477 ha

Common boundary

GM

canola

GM

canola

Author’s annotations after Supreme Court WA, 2015, Marsh v Baxter

non-GM

canola

2010 @ Kojonup, WA

(24)

What is Genetic Engineering?

(25)

Is it a GMO?

From a GM lab

By a GM engineer

Published in a GM journal

(26)

A

phenomenon

of the times -

the distrust of

‘experts’

Monsanto

Cargill

Syngenta

Bayer

BASF

Dow

CSIRO

UQ

QUT

RMIT

Murdoch Uni

U Adelaide

UWA

Sugar Research Aust

VicDEDJTR

VicDPI

>Profits

>Budget

People

Parents

Workers

Voters

Shoppers

Consumers

>Health

>Well being

>Family

>Safety

>Cuisine

(27)

GMO Smugglers Delusion

1. We can smuggle GMOs into the Australian supply chain

2. They’ll never know

3. They’ll never find out

(28)

GMO Triple Jeopardy

1. Not regulated

2. Not declared

(29)

GMO Exceptionalism

5 new techniques

(30)
(31)

Thomas Malthus -

inventing catastrophism

& wrong since 1798

after Malthus, 1798

Geometric

Arithmetic

Food

Population

(32)

The push to deregulate

some GMOs

Disallow these regulations:

*

to avoid

watering down the definition of GMOs

*

to avoid

going it alone in the world

(33)

Summary

1.

Bad science (e.g cane toads, asbestos, smoking, Fukushima et al)

2.

Bad deregulation (e.g Grenfell Tower, Lacrosse Apartments)

3.

Only 2 crops: GM canola & GM cotton

4.

Aus GM canola (491,528 ha)

5.

Aus GM cotton (282,000 ha)

6.

Aus Organic agriculture (35,645,038 ha)

7.

Australian GMOs = 0.4% of world GMOs

8.

Australian GMOs = 0.2% of Australian agriculture

9.

Australian Organic Ag = 51% of world Organic Ag

10.

The foundational lie of GM = ‘Substantial equivalence’

11.

OGTR regulates release of GMOs in Australia

12.

OGTR has never denied an application (n=167)

13.

World shoppers do not want GMOs (n=23,000)

14.

Australians say GMOs are not safe (n=1225)

15.

GM contaminates (Tas, WA, Marsh v Baxter)

16.

GM price penalty = 7.2%

17.

GM is what GM engineers do

18.

Monsanto is not going to save the world!

19.

Deregulation - think Grenfell Tower

20.

Just say NO to GM secrecy

21.

Just say YES to GMO transparency & regulation

(34)

Thank you

Questions

(35)

ABCA. (2019). Statistics: GM Canola Uptake. Melbourne: Agricultural Biotechnology Council of Australia (ABCA).

ABS. (2018). 4627.0 - Land, Management and Farming in Australia, 2016-17. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 26 June.

Bucat, J. (2018). 2019 Canola Variety Sowing Guide for Western Australia. Perth: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD), Governmnet of Western Australia.

Cormick, C., & Mercer, R. (2017). Community Attitudes to Gene Technology. Prepared for The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, Canberra, (OGTR). Sydney: Instinct and Reason.

Cotton Australia. (2019). Cotton to Market: Statistics. Sydney: Cotton Australia.

DPIPWE. (2014). Audit Report - May 2014 - Former Genetically Modified Canola Trial Sites. Hobart: Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE).

GfK. (2017). Decision Factors on What to Eat or Drink: Global GfK Survey (October 2017). London: GfK (Growth from Knowledge).

ISAAA. (2018). Pocket K No.16: Biotech Crop Highlights in 2017. Manila: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA).

Kentish, B. (2017). Grenfell Tower fire: Family of Syrian refugees among those reported missing. The Independent, 14 June. <independent.co.uk>.

Malthus, T. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population (1970 edition ed.). Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.

New York Times. (2017). Grenfell Tower fire: Mindless deregulationm senseless harm. New York Times, 22 June <nytimes.com>.

OGTR. (2019). Table of applications and authorisations for Dealings involving Intentional Release (DIR) into the environment. Canberra: Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR). <www.ogtr.gov.au>

Parliament of Australia. (2019). Gene Technology Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1) Regulations 2019. Canberra: Federal Register of Legislation. F2019L00573. 4 April.

Paull, J. (2008). Beyond equal: from same but different to the doctrine of substantial equivalence. M/C Journal of Media and Culture, 11(26). Paull, J. (2018). Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) as Invasive Species. Journal of Environment Protection and Sustainable Development,

4(3), 31-37.

Paull, J. (2019a). Organic Agriculture in Australia: Attaining the global majority (51%). Journal of Environment Protection and Sustainable Development, 5(2), 70-74.

Paull, J. (2019b). Genetically modified (GM) canola: Price penalties and contaminations. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 17(2), 1-4.

SMH. (2019). Have warts, will travel. Sydney Morning Herald (SMH), 19 July <heraldsun.com.au>.

Supreme Court WA. (2015). Marsh v Baxter. Perth: Supreme Court of Western Australia. Appeal, Court bundle. Taylor, L. (2019). Average cash price for Can1 and Cag1 for each port zone (figures supplied). Perth: Daily Grain. Weber, K., ed. Cane Toads and Other Rogue Species. 2010, PublicAffairs: New York.

Willer, H., & Lernoud, J. (Eds.). (2019). The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2019. Frick: Switzerland: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) & Bonn: IFOAM-Organics International.

(36)

GMOs: the wisdom of crowds & the folly of deregulation

John Paull

Abstract

Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) is pushing to change the definition of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The proposed changes would remove from regulation some GMOs that are presently subject to regulation by the OGTR. At present GMOs are subject to risk analysis, to safety evaluations, and to GM labelling if used in food. The proposed regulations, if they are not disallowed by the Australian Parliament, will water down the definition of GMOs in Australia, will have Australia applying definitions of GMOs that are different from major trading partners, and they risk damaging the clean and green export reputation of Australia's food and agriculture sectors. The GM proposed deregulation would be bad science and bad deregulation. Australia is a minnow in the world of GMOs, accounting for just 0.4% of the global GMO agricultural hectares. GMOs account for just 0.2% of Australia’s agricultural hectares. Food shoppers of the world reject GM food, led by Chinese consumers of whom 60% reject GM food. OGTR figures reveal that only 10% of Australians agree with the proposition that GMOs are “safe”. GMOs require labelling in Australia, and a direct consequence is that there are no GM food products on Australian supermarket shelves. The global GMO industry is founded on the lie of “substantial equivalence” where GM proponents insist to regulators that their GMO is the “same” as the organism from which it is derived, but to the Patent Office that their GMO is “novel, unique, different, and a real invention” and that it thereby warrants patent protection. Recent failures of deregulation, including London’s Grenfell Tower, Melbourne’s Lacrosse Apartments, and Sydney’s Opal Tower, highlight the follies of deregulation, and the reality that deregulation privatises profits and socialises costs. The case has not been made for deregulating of GMO in Australia, and there are substantial uncalibrated costs, risks and downsides for Australia’s food and agriculture exports industry. The proposed regulations ought to be disallowed.

References

Related documents

The Panel on Genetically Modifi ed Organisms (GMOs) was established in 2003 to provide independent scientifi c advice on the safety of GMOs (such as plants, animals and

Figure  4 compares the five products considered in this work in terms of environmental impact score from endpoint assessment, product weight, and number of construction

Hospital administration plays a key role in creating the necessary conditions at the institutional level to prevent spread of health care associated pathogens. The physical

We focus on children’s creative learning, creative thinking and group creativity, teacher’s creative teaching and teaching for creativity, and the creativity

- EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO); Draft Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed.

The H++ scenarios were developed using historical extreme heat waves and days with record high temperatures, and modelled changes in summer temperatures from the UKCP09

This research has shown that Miles and Snow framework is indeed applicable to studying firms in a developing nation such as India as well as in an emerging technology sector