• No results found

"New work"

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share ""New work""

Copied!
40
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Rochester Institute of Technology

RIT Scholar Works

Theses Thesis/Dissertation Collections

5-23-2001

"New work"

Joe Bialkowsky

Follow this and additional works at:http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses

This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please [email protected].

Recommended Citation

(2)

"NEW WORK"

A Graduate Thesis:

By

Joe Bialkowsky

Presented in fulfillment of a Masters in Fine Arts (Photography Concentration) From the:

College of Imaging Arts and Sciences: At Rochester Institute of Technology

May 23, 2001

The following members of my thesis committee have agreed to accept this written portion of my thesis as the completion of a Masters in Fine Arts:

-

----L!...!l~/~

ltl /

Chair: Jeff Weiss Date

Associate Professor, College of Imaging Arts and Sciences

Tim Engstrom

Associate Professor, College of Liberal Arts

Date

Dan Larkin Date

Assistant Professor, College of Imaging Arts and Sciences

Elliott Rubenstein Date

(3)

"NEW WORK"

A Graduate Thesjs:

By

Joe Bialkowsky

Presented in fulfillment of a Masters in Fine Arts (Photography Concentration) From the:

College of Imagjng Arts and Sdences: At Rochester Institute of Technology

May 23, 2001

I Joe Bialkowsky grant Rochester Institute of Technology permission to copy the written portion of this thesis, in full or in part, assuming due credit will be given to the author

when needed. The image portion of this thesis may only be copied with permission granted by the author. I may be reached at (509) 927-8422.

Joe BiaIkowsky

Joe Bialkowsky

Date

/I/~S/CJI~

.

(4)
(5)

Mythesisshow"newwork"

presents elevenverydifferent images linkedby

elevenhorizon lines dominatingthecomposition. TherearethreeAfricandesertscapes,

threeseascapes,twopictures ofRochester InternationalAirport,animageof adesk, a

Rothko,and an 17th

century Dutchlandscape. Only twoofthepieces are

"actual"

horizonlines,inthat theearth was photographed right atthepoint whereitmeetsthe

troposphere. Fivewere madein myapartment, twoinmuseums, one onfinalto runway

31RatJFK, and one isa picture of ones andzeros,ornothing at alldependingonhow

youlookatit. Everyoneoftheseimages dependontheframeofthecameratocreate

landscapesthatexistonlythrough thephotographer. In presentingtheseimages itoccurs

tomethat thephotographeris awriterof non-fiction. Becauseoftheverynatureof

photographytheimages aretobeseen as real. Thispresentsaninterestingparadoxinthe

context ofmywork. Theperfecthorizon isnotfound innature,onlythrough the

photographicframecan theperfecthorizonbeachieved. Thecontradictionisinthe

definitionofnon-fiction.

Here,obviously, wemust realizethatnon-fictionmerelymeans

basedinreality,whichphotography is,butatthesametimemalleableto the edgeofthe

definition. As I am alwaysthefirsttoadmitItrytomakebeautifulpictures. Butifwe

useKant theparadoxcontinues, "The beautiful innatureisconnectedwiththeformof

the object,which consistsinhaving [definite]boundaries. Thesublime, ontheother

hand, istobe foundinaformlessobject, asfaras initorbyoccasionofit boundlessness

ispresented and yetitstotalityisalso presenttothought." Thehorizon intheseimages

iscreatedusingaframetoallowittobecome infinite. Theseimages are sublimeinwhat

theybecomeandbeautiful intheirfiction.

1

Kant, Immanuel. CritiqueofJudgment. Translated byJ.H. Bernard. New York:

(6)

I

Gettingto thisbodyof workwas a process forme. Ifirsthadto releam,whatI

alreadyknew. Imade a major mistake uponfirstentering RIT andittookme most of a

yeartorecover. Theend resultisthis show,andIbelievefully thatmytimeatRIT

transformedme froma studentintoanartist,by allowingmetorecognizethatI already

was one.

Mymistake wastointroduce falsenarratives,whichIwilldiscussshortly, into

myworkinsteadofrecognizingtheonesthatwerethere to startwith. The second

mistake wastomakeworkforthosewho would critiqueme insteadofmaking it for

myself. My firstbodyofworkwas airplanes. I loveairplanes. Inthecourseoftime I

havebeenhereIhavebecome apilotmyself. Iwantedtohaveabodyofworkthatwas

incredibly simple andto thepoint. Simplicity isanaestheticvalueI strivefor,as seenin

minimalism. Inbasictermsitwould readas aestheticpresentationthatisuncluttered

withpoliticalagenda,wheretheaesthetic

"subject"

is paramountinimportanceto the

reality ofthe subject. This allowsfortheaestheticstobecomethesubject and notmerely

theframework. Furthennoretohelpdefinethesimplicity in my work we canconsiderthe

overall subject oftheseimagestobethemathematicalanddynamicsublimefound in

Kant.2

Theinfinite dimensionsofthesky asopposedto thetangible dimensionsofthe

groundhaveasimplicity inthat thereisno definition. Itcouldbearguedthat the

metaphoristheconqueringoftheunknownthroughtechnology, butIwouldsaythe

2

(7)

airplaneisobserved againsttheskynotin oppositiontoit. Thesublimehere issimple in

thatithasnodefinition. Atthe timeofthe critique oftheseimages,I hadnotyetcometo

understandtheimplications of whatmyaesthetic was. Or betteryet, Ihadnotbeenable

totranslatewhatI strivedtoattainintoEnglish. Oneofthecritiques thatstruck me was

this, "theseare stockimagesthatI have seen ahundredtimesbefore."

Iwastakenback

bythiscritique asnegative, andit may wellhavebeen,but I didnot seethatitwas

exactlywhatIwasaiming at. Theyaretheeveryday imagesyousee andhearinthe sky,

butIwantyoutolookatthemforthebanality,andthinkaboutthemasartobjectsframed

out ofthe dayto dayworld. Theirbanalityistheirstrength. Againconsiderthe

photographer asthewriterof non-fiction. In showing realitythewriterhasmade a

decisionabout reality. Hehas decidedwhatis importantenoughto portray, andI am not

showingyou an airplanebecauseI wanttocommenton airtravelortechnology, Iam

showingyouan airplane soyoucan see it. Intransformingthe image fromaframecut

fromtheeverydayintoan artobject,Icanachieveanaestheticofthebanal. There may

be littleor nodifferencebetweenone ofmy imagesandthoseofa corporatereport,but

herethecontextbecomesimportant. Thepointisnottoshowtheairplaneina romantic

waysuch astoattractpotentialcustomers,buttodisplaytheviewofairplane andsky as

somethingworthconsidering aesthetically and perhaps as a creation oftheartistic

sublimefromthemundane. When critiquing landscapephotographers inthegrand

traditionofAnsel Adamsandcompany, thereisno questionabouttheaweinspiring

sublime and overwhelmingbeautyofnature,I seetheseimages inthesame way.

Althoughtheskydoes not possesstheabilityto inspireaweaseasilyasthemountain, its

(8)

simplicity. Theairplanedeservesmore observationby itsabilitytoexistin suchan

immenseenvironment. The dualnature oftheskytopossess thesublimein itsmost

potentformand itsaestheticsimplicitymakeit veryworthnoting philosophically and

artistically. My argumenttowardsmy aestheticisthatsimplicity doesnot comeeasily

andthatiswhat givesit immensepoweraestheticallyand philosophically. The false

narrative,Imentionedearlier, wasmy attempttogivemeaningtoseemingly

meaninglessimages of airplanes. Here istheartist's statementfromtheairplaneshow.

Theairplanehas transformed thephysicallandscape. Thevastness ofthelandscapeshrankwith

therailroadsandlatertheinterstatesystem, but theairplanehasmadeitminuscule. Mountain

ranges thatusedto takemonthsto cross,pass inminutes. The toweringRockyMountainsare

bumpsonan endless horizon. Themonthsat seatotravelfrom Paris toNew Yorkbecomea

movie and a nap.

Whiletheairplanehasrecreatedthelandscapeithas becomea partofit. Campingin Montanaa

hundredmilesfromthe nearesttownyou canlook upandseeplanesheadingfrom Seattleto the

east coast. While sittingaround a campfire inthe snow,hundreds ofpeople areon a plane above

drinkingcoffee andreadingmagazines. Distanceturnsabstract. Inthe time itwouldtake to

walkfromthe campsiteto thecar afewmilesaway,people ontheplane willbein New Yorktaxis 2,000milesto theeast.

Ihadnoideathatmyworkhadartsignificance, andsecondly I hadnoideathatI

reallyknewwhatI wasdoing. I cameupwiththisstatementtojustifythe work, out of a

needtofeel legitimateas an artist. Ofcourse,those who critiquedme could not seethe

substanceofthisstatementinthework. Howcouldthey? I donotbelievethestatement

tobewrongorfabricated. IdobelievethatI tried tousetheideas in myheadtovalidate

thework onthewall. WhyI findairplanesinteresting isnotthepoint. ThepointisthatI

puttheairplanesonthewallbecause I findtheminteresting. I respondedto thenegative

critiqueinthewrongway. I wasalready very insecure aboutmy abilitytospeak

intellectually aboutmyworkandthismade itworse. Ican remembertellingthe story,

(9)

nearesttown. Theisolationwas atthesametimewonderful andterrifying. Ilookedsix

milesupatthecontrailofajet. Itwas wonderful,and maybe one ofthemostsublime

thingsIhadever seen. Itmadethefeelingofremoteness even stronger and atthe same

timemore comfortable. Itwas an experiencethatisverysimilarto theaestheticI

described earlier. Montanaiscalled"big sky

country"

forareason. Formethisview of

an airplaneis a much stronger experience ofthesublimethanany Ican recollect. The

feelingcomesfromthe sheer sizeinvolved. Lookingupand seeingatiny silhouetteof an

aircraft against such a massiveskywhose volumeisincomprehensiblereminds me of

howsmall we are,and yetuptherepeople are drinkingcoffee andreadingmagazines,

andtheydonotfeel so small. Itoccurredtomehowmuch perspective plays a role in

understandingthesize and power ofthings. Andwhilethismay havenotbeenan

importantelementto the airplaneimages, it is verymuch a part ofthethinkingthatledto

this thesis. Itold the storyas ananalogytoward theideas Iwastryingtoincorporatewith

thework. I believeI wastryingtodescribe howtheairplanehasmadetheworld smaller

(someofthebullshit Itried tomaketheworkseemlegitimate). Someonecommented, "

Yes, Iknowwhatits liketobeinthemiddleof nowhereand youlook up and seean

airplane."

Thecomment was anegative responsetoward technology's invasionof nature.

Thisresponse was not at all whatI was fishingfor. Inever wantedtoincorporatethese

ideas intothe work,butfeltIneededtoinorderforthesepictures tobecomeart. Butall

thewhiletheideaofexperiencing thesublimein bothnature andtechnologybecame

important. Irealizedthat seeingamachineflyingthroughtheatmosphereinso remote a

(10)

who seeanyinvasionoftheuntamedbyman asnegative, Iseeit as abeautiful and

profound comment on modemlife.

Iwouldhavetosaythatas an artist one ofthemostdepressingthingsistoknow

youmake strong,while notknowingwhy. Ibeganalongprocess offocusingonthe

contentofmywork. Forthefirsttimeinmylife Itookanideaandtried tomakework

aboutit. Allofthe things thatI nowknowwere successful abouttheairplanes

disappearedfrom mymind andI made arttoimpressmyprofessors and make me a

legitimateartist. Mywork sufferedbecauseI was nolonger usingtheframeofthe

cameratocreatetheimagesthatIsee,buttoprovethatIhadtheintellectualcapacityto

make good art. I havelongbelievedthat thebestandlongest livedartworkis thatwhich

isbrilliantaesthetically, whichinturn,makesitbrilliant intellectually. Iwasmaking

workwhich was neither andthatkindofworkisshortlived indeed. The workfrom my

showfollowingtheairplaneswasvery poorinthecritique. I donotrecall whattheidea

wasexactlybecause itwas completely fabricatedfor myprofessors.I realizedif I was

goingtobecomeanartistinsteadofastudent,IhadtofindoutwhatI wasreallydoing

artisticallyanddiscuss it.

Ittook twoevents toreversethedownwardtrendIhadtaken. Thefirstwas a

small show atRITofworkbygraduatestudents. Itookfourimages fromthebodyof

workfollowingtheairplane show and reorganizedthem. Theimages hadbeencoupled

with others intriptychsanddiptychs, intheirfirstshowing. Iwas attemptingagainto

place a narrative onthework which wasnonexistent visually. Again,as withthe

airplane showthecritique was verynegative. Theworkno longergavetheviewer a

(11)

7

I selectedfouroftheimagesand putthemup,this timeonthere own, Irealizedthatthey

weregood. Whatwas strongaboutmyworkhadn'tdisappeared,myunderstanding ofit

had. Itcamerushing backtome howmuchI adoremakingart,andhowpassionate I was

abouttheimages. The secondthingthatfixedme was afellowartistwhohelpedme

rememberthatartis funandbeautiful,and pointed outthatImake artinthatmold.

I startedtakingpicturesthatI lovedagain andItookalot. Whenthelastreview

ofmywork cameupthatspring, I hadtwelveimages selectedfromover600. It had been

thesingle mostintenseand successfulworkingperiod ofmylife. IntwomonthsI

photographed everything. I didn'tstoptoconsider whatthework wasaboutbecausethe

question was answeredinthemakingofthework. Ifinallycamefullcircle. Everything

thatwassuccessful abouttheairplaneswas inthisworkandIknewwhy. Evennow

typingthis paper,I realizehowsimplethatanswer was allalong,andhowimportantthe

process offindingtheanswerwas. Ihadalways assumedthat therewouldbea revelation

thatallowed metojustifymy workintellectually. Ihadneverknown howpowerful

visuallanguageis. Thereisalmost no waytodescribewhatmakes a good picturegood,

youjust know. Gerhard Richterwhenaskedtocommentonhispaintings says,"talk

about painting: there'sno point whenyouconveyathingthrough themedium of

languageyou

change."3

My failingwastryingtoconveyan imagewiththewrong

language insteadofdescribing why Itake thepicture. By lookingintomyimagesand

askingwhatis itthatcompels meinthe subject matterI foundtheanswers Iwaslooking

for. Iwastryingtofindsome profoundartistic needin making images,insteadof

lookingforthe simple reasons. These images are sometimes of subjects sobanal it seems

3

Cora, Bruno. "GerhardRichter: TheExperienceofPaintingandtheKnowledgeof

Reality"

(12)

8

ridiculoustoconsiderthemaesthetically. When I havemycamera andam withfriends

theyoften see metakea picture andsay,"What inthehell are youtakinga picture

of?"

or,"Whyare youtakinga pictureof that?"

Ihavedifficultyexplaining why I wouldhave

nointerestin photographinga sunsetbecauseIwouldbetransformingsomething sublime

into somethingbeautiful. This forme represents astep inthe wrong directionartistically.

Thesublime sunsetis bestviewedinreallife. My goal wouldbeto take thatwhichis

disregardedas aneverydayoccurrence and make itbeautiful,orthatwhichis beautiful

and makeit sublime. Imakebeautifulthings out ofwhatis essentially not,generally

speaking. The frameofthecamerais importanthere in its abilitytore-contextualizean

image. Theargumentbecomesphilosophical,as Iamassumingthatmyimages,before

they areframedout ofthe everyday,arenotsublimeinandofthemselves. Considera

busycity street. Theimagesand sounds areconstantly changing,amongstthis isablue

sheet of plywood propped against afencetoencloseaconstruction site. Observed

amongsttherest oftheimagery inthecity it isofno consequence. But iftheframeofthe

camerafiltersouttherest ofthecity andleaves onlythespacewheretheplywoodmeets

the street, theimage isplacedina newcontext. It may be obvious whattheimage is of,

butwhatitconveyshaschanged. Itisnowastudy oflineandcolor, it isalandscape.

Onlythrough thecameraisthistransformation achieved,takingwhat was notsublime,

butmerely a part ofsomething larger,andgiving itaforum for itself.

Two wordsthatareoverused in myexplanations ofmyworkare

"beauty" and

"simplicity". From my perspectiveIusetheminterchangeablyalongwiththesublime. I

have foundthatinordertotranslatemypersonal visual language,I must showthe

connectionbetween"simple"and

"beautiful" and

"beautiful"

(13)

thecontext ofmyworktheinterpretation ofthesewords andtheirrelationtooneanother

is importanttoapproachmy workingmethod. Eachisinreferencetoan essential

element ofmywork. Considersimplicity. Itwouldbean error formeto linkthisalone

withthe aesthetictheoriesofminimalism,butminimalisttheoriesare

very important in

describingmy aesthetic. Two drivingformsofminimalism aredominant in my work.

Thefirst is describedas an,"extremeand reductiveformalism ofthePost-Painterly

abstractionists,who soughttopurify painting ofeverything butitsmostirreducibly

essential

properties"4

Andthesecondtheoryis this,"Theusein highartofobjects from

low, everydaylifewith minimal orno modification imposedonthembythe artist"5

Bothofthese theoriesadequatelydescribetheinfluenceminimalismhas hadonmywork.

Thelattershouldbeobviousconsidering my subjectmatterandthediscussion ofthelast

paragraph. The former isnot as obvious. A

"simple"

reductionofformand contentto

only essential propertiesis fortheminimalists awayofapproachinganideal. Formeit

istocreateclarity inseeing, ormoretothe point, tomaketheimage lesscluttered. The

simplicity I seekis inthe sublime. It may seem ahypocrisyto linkthese twowords as

thesublimeusuallyreferstothatwhichisbeyond humanunderstanding, in Kantian

terms,but hereI see aconnection. Considerthepointwherethe skymeetstheearthin

thehorizon line. Here isthemostsimplisticformoflandscape aesthetically. Itisalso

simpleintermsofthesublime. Itisabasicequation, equalamountsofearth andsky, it

isthesameequationthatminimalartisbasedon, thatofpositiveand negative space,bare

essentialform. But atthe sametime this compositionistheultimate formofthesublime

4

Hunter, SamandJohnJacobus. Modem Art: Painting SculptureArchitecture. 3rded.

New York: PrenticeHall, 1992.

5

Hunter, SamandJohnJacobus. Modem Art: Painting Sculpture Architecture.

3rd

ed.

(14)

10

becauseit dealswithinfinity. When shownintheformatofmythesisworkthisline

extendsto infinity. The skyisendless, andincomprehensible. Wherethemountain

rangemayhave more powertoinspire awe,it is comprehensible,its massiscalculable,

anditspowerislimited. The horizonline isnot. Itismyattemptto create asimplistic

formofthesublime andtherefore to create an ultimate formofthe sublime. Themore

simplistic, themore powerful.

Beautyis something I oftenusetoreplacethe sublime,because Iam an artist and

theform Iwishtocreateisoneofsublime pleasure. In referringto thesublime andto

beautyKantmakes adistinction,"The beautifulinnatureisconnectedwiththeformof

the object,whichconsists inhaving [definite] boundaries. The sublime,ontheother

hand,istobefoundinaformlessobject, asfaras in itorbyoccasionofit boundlessness

ispresentedand yetitstotalityisalso presentto

thought."6

Ifused inthe context ofthe

horizon linethisquoteis very fitting. There isaboundlessness inthehorizonitselfand

itstotalitycanbeconsidered withintheimage,yettheformlessness is intheinfinite

space suggestedbysuchalineandbytheimmense sizeimplied. The form ofthehorizon

line isbeautiful andits implicationsaresublime.

For everytimeI depressthe shutter,I may havepointedthecameratentimesand

decidedagainstphotographing it. Therewere problems withthethirdbody ofwork. The

main problem wasthat theimages werenotconnected. Thatistrue. Iwantedtoput all

600 onthewall. Ihadphotographed sointenselyforsolongthatin editingtheworkI

could not selectsimilarimages for fear Imightintroducean unwanted narrative.And

whiletheshowmayhavefailedonsome levels,overallitwas anincredible successfor

6

Kant,Immanuel. CritiqueofJudgment. TranslatedbyJ.H. Bernard.New York:

(15)

11

me. I hadfiguredout whatIdo,becomeincrediblyconfidentin mywork, andstarted

lovingart again. The statementfromthisshowleddirectlytomythesisshow.

Thecontemporary landscape isnotthenaturalsublime, butthe mundane,and

over-familiar. Byreducingthisworldthrough thephotographicframe, a form ofbeautyisfound.

Thesesometimescoldandbanalimages createastandardofbeautyisolatedfroma worldthat is

seemingly uglyin itsrepetition.

As Ihavestatedbefore, thereisanessential needtousetheframeofthecamera

as aneditingtool. Ireferto thecontemporary landscapeasthatof repetition. Here I am

referringto the everyday plasticityofcontemporary culture- the

world we trytoescape

frombyvacationingtoplaces wherethenatural sublimeisintact. Ifelttheneedto

createbeauty outoftheworldthatispassedby. Imentioned earliertheblueplywood

andtransformingittoa singular experienceworthy ofinspection. Theshiftfromthislast

bodyofworktomythesisworkis seeingtheworkas sublime as opposedtomerely

beautiful. Imentioncold andbanal inreferenceto theseimages,whichin some cases is

truebutoverallthisrefersto thesubjectmatter. The importance artistically formeis

againthesimplebeautythatcanbe foundinaneveryday image. A sidewalkiseveryday

and overfamiliar,but iftransformedintoan artisticformthroughthecameraitcan

become beautiful. The purposeistorecreate an objectinto aformal relationshipwhich

allowsittobecomeartistic. Oftheforemostminimaliststhemajorityworked with

sculpture. Thismakes sense as a sculpturecanbecreatedcompletelyas aformal

relationship,where something based in reality hastobetransformedinordertosuggest

an artisticformality. This isonereasonthatI amnot atrue minimalist,nor wishtobe,

(16)

12

II

Whilehavingathesis show oftwelveseeminglyunconnectedimages couldhave

beenproblematic forthe viewer, itgave methebasis for understandingthe systemIuse

inphotographing. As I said, Itend tophotographthebanalandthrougha specific

method ofeditingcreatemyart. J.M.W Turner, a manwhoiswellknown for painting

sublimelandscapesfullof atmosphere andlight,made apainting in 1844thatis

incrediblymodem and similarto mywork. Hetook the railroad, theultimate symbol of

thedestructivenature ofindustrializationandturneditintothesublime. Rain, Steam,

andSpeed(Figure 12.)wastheresult of atraintripTurnertookinwhichhe spent mostof

theridehanginghis head fromthe window,something I amveryfamiliarwith. When

askedbyafriendwhy hewould paintsomethingsougly hereplied,"toprovethatIcan

make eventheuglybeautiful."7The significanceofunderstandingthispainting is

importantinhelpingtounderstandmyown work. Turneris a painterofthesublime. His

atmospheric canvasses are neverstill,theysuggestthemotion and conflict of nature.

Whendescribinghis reasoning for paintingthetrain,Turneris humble. His attemptto

makesomething ugly beautifulisa simpleway ofdescribingtheconflict ofthenatural

sublime andthetechnological sublime. JeremyGilbert-Rolffdescribesthe

"techno-sublime",asthis, "The limitlessnessonce found innaturegivesway, intechnology,toa

limitlessnessproduced out of an ideawhich isnotinterested inbeing anideaofnature,

butone which replacestheideaofnature. Naturesublimated inasublimethatcomes

7

(17)

13

afteritand in,orwith,with whichit is now obligedtolive"8 What linksthisworkto

mine and what makes ita sublimepainting istheinsistence ofharmony. Theindustrial

sublime, as viewedthrough thetrain, is linkedto coal andsmoke, loudcold and

destructivecreations ofsteel andbackbreakinglabor. For Turnertorepresentthe trainas

beautiful andinharmonywith natureistheultimate comment of optimismforthefuture

anda shiftfromthethinkingofthosewhofindtheultimate experience of artin God.

Although Hegel findsthesublimeinGod,he also seestheapparent needfortechnology

inadialecticalrelationshipwithnature. 9 Thereis a needfortechnologyandits

existencebecomes sublimeby itsappearance. CommentingonGunpowder,which we

can useinplace ofthetrain,Hegelsuggeststhis need," Humanityneededit,anditmade

its appearance

forthwith"10

Inthe traditions ofthepastartwhichdealswithmaninthe

everydayisbanal and cowersbeneaththepower ofthenatural sublimei.e. God. Turner

haschangedtheparadigmby placingbeautyequally intonatureand man. Thefeelingof

thesublime one encounterswithnatureis now afeelingofthesublimeinthecreations of

man. Theconnectionwithmy work istheneedtodisassociatemyselfwiththegrand

traditionoflandscape painters. Myimagesarecreatedsolelythrough the lensof

technology. If my imagesaretobeseenas sublimeit isnotthesublimeofGod butthat

of man. Nowtheaweinspiringpowerofthemountaincanberecreatedthroughman.

This concept mightbecomeeasiertograsp ifoneistorememberwhatthereaction wasto

8

Gilbert-Rolff,Jeremy. BeautyandtheContemporary Sublime. New York: Allworth Press, 1999.

9

Hegel,G.W.F. Aesthetics: Lectures onFineArt. Trans: T.M.Knox, London: Oxford UniversityPress, 1975.

10

Gilbert-Rolff,Jeremy. Beauty andtheContemporary Sublime. NewYork: Allworth

(18)

14

askyscraper,airplaneortrainwhenseen as a child. This isthepowerthetrainhadto the

worldacentury ago. Technologyhasbecomenatures equalinits

abilitytoinspireawe.

Partofarrivingat anunderstandingof ones own

work,is infindingits placein art

history. Ihave longbeenresistantto the ideaofmyworkas post modem. Myconceptof

the postmodern, when placed onphotographers, isthe workofRichardPrince, Sheri

Levine,andCindy Sherman. Myworkhas alwaysbeenbasedon aesthetics andtohave it

labeledpostmodernwould,forme,placeitinthedecidedlyanti-aesthetic arthistorical

slot oftheaforementionedartists. Theproblem allalonghasbeenthat theworkisnot

straightforewordenoughtobemodem. Iftheeraofthepostmodern isanageoflost

innocence, asUmbertoEcowoulddescribeit,thenmyworkwouldhavetobeveryself

aware. Itisnot. Myworkcouldbedescribedas

"innocent"

inan age oflost innocence.

Theuse ofthe televisionand computertocreateimagesalongwithimagestraditionally

made speaks ofthepostmodern appropriation of mass culture. It isandisnot. Forthe

Richard Princestheappropriationisthe art, thelossof artisticinnocence, (beauty, form,

originality)is thepostmodern statement. With myworkthe appropriation, or

photographing oftechnologicallandscapes, isan

"innocent"

use ofthe imagery around

me, albeit a calculatedpostmodern innocence. Iamdescribingtheuseoftelevisionasif it

were alandscape,notblindto the implicationsofaninformationsociety,but usingit

withoutworryingaboutitspolitical statement. In away Iuseditbecause itwasthere.

ThepostmoderndefinitionofCarl Jencksisapplicabletomy workashe isdescribing

postmodern architecture. Inhiswordsthepostmodernis, "doublecoding: the

combination ofmodemtechniques withsomething

else."11

Myworkis basedin

(19)

15

modernism, asthe aesthetics are paramount. Thedouble codingisintheuse ofanyand

allsourcesfortheexecution ofthework. Inone ofthepieces(Figure. 8),thecomputeris

solelyusedtocreatethelandscape. WhentheworkisshownI donotmentiontheuse of

thecomputerbecauseIdonot wantthatsourcetobeconsidered as asubjectofthework.

HereagainI say Iamusingthesource"innocently"withfull knowledgeofits

postmodernimplications,allthewhiledenyingitsimportance. Againinthewords of

Jencks,"Ican'tdenytheconventionalbeauty ofthe past, orthecurrenttechnologicaland

social

reality."

Myimagesareveryformbased, createdusingaformula makingthem

modem,ontheotherhandthe sources are eclecticborderingonsporadic,whichis

postmodern. Whatdifferentiatesthesefromotherpostmodernphotographs,besidesthe

emphasisona modernistaesthetic, isagainthe innocentuseofthesources. The heightof

postmodernappropriation createdtheultimate skepticismregardingthedrive forstraight

forewordoriginalityfoundinthemodernists. Myuse of appropriationisnotavain

attemptto usurpmodernism,butareinsertionof modernism intoimageryderived froma

postmodernworld. Thissaid,I willsay mywork isclosertowhatEdward Rothstein

believeswillbethepostpostmodern,"Postpostmodernismwillbeavarietyof

modernism."12

If IhadtodescribewhatIwantedmythesis tobethroughreferencetomy

influences, Iwouldsaythis; Iwanttheclean linesandminimal perfection ofDonald

Judd (Figure 18.), IwantthebrillianceofAndreasGursky(Figure 15.),andIwantthe

raw sublimebeautyofMark Rothko (Figures 16. & 17.). These weremygoals. I wantto

start withGursky,because afterseeinghis retrospectiverecently Ifinally understood

12

Rothstein, Edward. Modem andPostmodernthebickeringtwins.The New York Times

(20)

16

whatit isthatis sobrilliantabouthiswork. Upuntilthisrealization, I believed onlythat

hemade picturesthatwere somonumentallybigthattheyhadtobegood. ButnowI see

whytheyare sointriguingandwhyhe issobrilliant. Gursky recreatesthe worldin a

wayitcould neverbeseen. BythisI don'tmeanthe transformationoftherealthatis

inherenttoany artwork,butanironyof seeing. Gursky's images seemveryrealandvery

straightforeword. WhatmakesGursky's imagery,"Knock-your-socks-off,"

inthewords

ofPeter Galassi isthat thereis anunderlyingstrangenessto theimagery. They aretoo

perfect. The images havea sharpness andclaritythatishyper-real,thusbecoming

imaginary. Thebestexample ofthisfoundinGurskyandwhichmost echoesmy workis

Rhine II(Fig. 15) InthisimageGurskyfoundanunnaturallystraightsection ofthe

meandering RhineriverinwesternGermany. Inorderto givetheimagea minimalist

perfectionheremovedseveraldistractingelements ofthesceneviacomputer. Theresult

isariver scapehorizonlinethatistooperfectfornature andcanonlybecreatedthrough

Gursky'seyes. This imageis depictingavery natural sceneinahyper-realway. When

one considersthehardstraightlinesofminimalism suchasin Donald Judd'ssculpture, or

Sol Lewitt'swalldrawings, itseemsinoppositionto theorganic shapeofthenatural

world. Thereisamathematical purity intheseworks thatisechoedthroughGursky. The

riverscenedoes notexist, andfurthermorewhatwasnaturalbecomesalandscape builtto

fitthemold of artisticcomposition. Gurskyachievesthesublimeintheway Turnerdid,

buttakingitto anotherlevelthatis so simpleitis brilliant. Like Turner'strain,Gursky

usestechnologyandmoldsitwithnatureina perfectharmonythatevokesthesublime in

bothnature andinman. Inthewords ofthedirectoroftheMuseumofModemArt,

13

(21)

17

"Gurskypresents some ofthemost original andimpressivecontributionstorecent

art."14

Bytakingwhat was almostinoppositiontonatureby itslackofemotion,minimalismis

transposedontothenatural worldcreatinga post-industriallandscapethatcombinesthe

bestoflandscapepaintingwiththemost strippeddownformofmodemart.

Iwantmy showtohavethecleanlines and perfection you seein Donald Judd.

(Fig. 18). Theconstruction ofthespacefortheshow wasdone mainlytoremoveany

distractionfromthework. Iwantedthehardand sometimes soft edgeofthehorizonto

dominatethe space, intheway Judd'sboxes dominatea spacewithalmost eerie

simplicity. Bybreakingdown formto amathematicallyprecise workingmethod,Judd

addscomplexityto the form. Galassimakesthemostto thepointdescriptionofthe

overlap betweenminimal andconceptualart, "...rigor ofconception,precision of

execution,and stringentrejectionofostentatiousaffect are notbarrierstodrop-dead

beauty. Onthe contrary,especially inconcerttheycanbeexcellentmeans ofachieving

it."15

Judd's minimalismalsoflowedintotheworkby means ofthehorizon line. In

several oftheimagesfromthisshowtheline is almostperfect, something rarely found in

nature,withthepossible exceptionoftheseascape. Thereis something unbelievably

powerful intherigid simplicityoftheunmarredhorizon. InGurskyandSugimoto (Fig.

14),themoreminimalthe imagebecomes,themore sublimeits impact. God's horizon

line isnot one of mathematicalsimplicity,butoneof chaoticcomplexity, whenit is

reducedto formit becomesthesublimeofman. Thechair ofmy committeecommented,

thatifyoudrawalinethrougharectangle you willhavealandscape. Itistooperfectto

14

Galassi, Peter. Andreas Gursky. NewYork:TheMuseumofModemArt,2001. pg 6.

(22)

18

bealandscapebutashumans weare unabletodivorcetheequationoftopandbottom

fromthelandscape.

Thequestion of subject matterhascomeupwhendiscussing mywork. The

subjectisthepoint where earth andskymeetcreatingthehorizon line. Thesubjectisthat

point wherespaceis defined. Theoneimage fromtheshowwithadefinable subjectis

Untitled(Fig. 1). Inthis imagethesubjectis nottheforeground, as itshouldbein a

landscape,butthewingoftheplaneinthe"empty"space abovethehorizon. Thenatural

sublime inthelandscape isthat theearthisman's anddefinableandthesky isGod's

countryandindefinable. Heretheskyis dominatedwiththesubject andthe land is

belowas an afterthought. Again Turnercomestomindinthat thisisthe sublimeofman.

MarkRothkoturnsup inmy workin Untitled (Fig. 3). Mark Rothko'spaintings are

monumentalinthe same scale ofGursky'sphotographs. Rothko'sare sublime insize and

color. They are notlandscapes butthereare landscapesinthem. Rothkotakes simplicity

to theextreme. Foran entirecareerhemade paintings about colorand lightthatnever

became boring. MyimageofRothkoisnotheretocomment onRothko. Iam nottrying

toconvey whatit is liketobenear aRothko,buttoshowtheviewerwhatit is likeforme

tobe in frontof aRothko. By specifically framingaline inhispaintingandchanging

what was ahugeverticalcanvas intoahorizontal photograph, Imakelandscapes within

hispaintings. Youcan not seetheRhine in Gursky'sview withoutthecomputerand you

can not seethehorizonlinein Rothkowithoutmycamera. Thecomputer, forGursky,

removestheelements ofthenaturallandscapethathe founddistractingandthatobscured

thelineofthe composition,withoutthis tool theviewinGursky'smindcouldneverbe

(23)

19

fields aredominant. Usingthecameratotransformthe

verticalto thehorizontaland

emphasizingthelinethatseparatesthecolors, alandscapeisbom,whichwaspreviously

onlyviewedinconcept. A second piecein my showisdirectly influencedbyRothkoand

thatis Untitled(Fig. 6). Itisnotnecessaryto theimagetomakethis connection, butis

important intheway Iconstructanimage. A second, muchdifferent,Rothkoinspired

this image directly. (Fig. 17), is abasiccompositionofdarkoverlight. Whatmakesthis

apaintingofformandcolor, and not alandscape, isthat thedark, orearth,isontopand

thecanvas isvertical. I lookedforthisformin mydaytodaybusinessandfoundit ina shadow on an airportparking ramp. Ididnot needto track thisRothko downto

photographitandtheninvertit. I couldfindit inahugeslab of asphalt. Thelight isnow

ontopwherethe skyshouldbeandit becomesalandscape.

Gerhard Richter (Fig. 13),makes paintings ranging fromfields ofcompletegray,

topicturesque landscapes,tocomplete abstractions. Whilehe maynot admittoit; the

similaritiesbetweentheworksare striking. Onecould arguethathisabstractions arejust

as muchlandscapesashis

"real"

landscapes. Hemakeshispaintingsfromphotographs,

andwhenaskedwhatthey are, hereplies, "I'mnottryingtoimitate aphotograph;I'm

tryingtomake one. And ifIdisregardtheassumptionthataphotographisa pieceof

paper exposedto light,thenIampracticing photographyby othermeans: I'mnot

producingpaintingsthatremind youofaphotographbut producing

photographs"16

Richter is conveyingthesublimethroughpaintingthroughphotography. Theinfluence

hereis intherealizationthat photography is morethanrepresentation. Itis not a new

ideatosaythataphotographtransformsreality. Ofcourse,itcanneverconveythe true

16

Elger,Dietmar. Gerhard RichterLandscapes. Ostfildern-Ruit: CantzVerlag, 1998. pg

(24)

20

qualities ofthemomentit depicts. Ithas longbeen knownthatphotographsdolie, ortell

halftruths. What is important forme aboutRichteris hisunderstandingthatbypainting

reality inawaytocreate aphotograph, he is commentingontheintellectual capacityof

photography,andelevatingitto thestatus of painting. Usingpaintingandphotography

interchangeablyallowsthephotographertobeelevatedintellectually. Richteris placing

importanceontheabilityto reproduce arealitythat the artist wishestosee. For me,

photographyhas alwaysbeen barredinthis way. If Mark Rothkopaintingswere

photographs,viewers would always questionthesubject. Paintingisallowedtogo

beyondthesubjectintotherealmoftheabstract withoutthis crutch. Byremovingthis

distinction Richtercan paintlandscapesand abstractions onthesame day. Ina world

wherethephotographedlandscape is overusedandthuslooses itspunch, thepainted

photograph can regain it. I foundthatIneeded pieces ofboth. Icouldcreate a landscape

thatbecomesrealbecauseit isaphotograph,whileretainingthepower ofcreationfound

inpainting. In Untitled(Fig. 4), IphotographedapaintingbytheDutch landscape

painterPhillips Konick. UpuntilthepointI happeneduponhis painting,whilesearching

forVermeer,Landscape 1619. (Fig. 19)I hadneverheardofhim. Whatstruckmewas

howsimplistic andengagingthispaintingwas,especially surroundedbyover painted

landscapes inwhichthelandscape itselfisonlyabackdropto man's activity. My

photographofKonickis innoway acommentonhim,butareaction ofmycamera. Two

interestingsituations developedout ofmakingthisimage. Firstofall, Irealizedthat

Konickwas not sounlikeme. Althoughhemadehis landscapes inthetraditionofthe

natural sublime,he fixedthemtofit hisaesthetic. Whenyouseetheoriginalpainting

(25)

21

landscapeswithhills, as thewhole countryis flatterthata pancake. Thesecondsituation

istheinterestingone. Landscapesarehardtoconvey,astheframe hindersthemagnitude

oftheimage. When Iset outtophotographKonick, his framemadeithardformeto

cropouthismountainssoI couldhavemyperfecthorizon line. I comebacktoRichterin

thatashesayshemakesphotographs, I wouldsaythisisnot a photograph of aKonick

painting,buta photograph of alandscape.

The four imagesintheshowtakenfromthe television Untitled, (Fig. 2,4,10,11),

couldbeusedtoconnectthework as a whole. As Istatedearlier, theproblemIfacedas

a new student wasinrecognizingthesignificance ofmyown work. As Ihavealso

stated,simplicity offormand aestheticshave ruledmy methodology for makingwork.

Through makingandtalkingabouttheworkpresentedhere,I realizedthat thecontent

whichIfeltIwaslackingwas embeddedinthe aesthetic,ormoretheretrieval ofthe

aesthetic. Inthesearchfor horizonlines Iwantedtotry asmany sources as possible. It

never occurredtomethat the content oftheworkwas inthewaythe sources were

gathered. I photographedhorizonsonthe televisionbecausethey werethereand

accessible. If Ilookto modernismfor myinfluences,thenitmustbeunderstoodthatit is

throughpostmodern glasses. The landscapeseenthroughthe televisioncanbeseen asan

exampleof aninformation driven societywhere moreworldexperiences are found

throughtechnologyratherthanthroughreallife. Thecreationofanaturalsublime

landscapefromthetechnologicalsublime of massinformationculture,isaresponseto

technology similartoTurner's responseto therailroadage. Where Turnerplacesthe

traininharmony withnature, I have createdthepicturesqueout oftechnologyplacingthe

(26)

22

Myworkhas alwaysbeenpositive whetherit dealswithtechnology or nature. There isa

loveofthe timeand culturethatinspired it,asopposedtoso much currentpostmodern

workwhich does nothing butcomplain about social ills andlongsfor

thepastinsteadof

embracingthepresent. DonGrey,an artist andcritic,inaletterto theSenate

Subcommittee onEducationwrote, "is itanywonderthatmostcontemporary artis itself

meaningless andpurposelessexcepttoscoff atsociety and genuineart,and mimicthe

depletedviews ofits creators and adherents? Likeother aspectsofoursociety, such

artisessentially diseased. Itiserodedbypsuedo-creativity,dehumanization,triviality,

venality,and

sterility."1

Ibringthisupatthe end ofthepapertoleaveanimpressionof

themost strippeddownreasonfor my makingwork. Imentionedbeforeafeelingof

creating

"innocent"

workina postmodern world of lost-innocence. This comes froma

longingforbeauty and optimisminart. The generalfeelinginmuchcontemporary

critiqueisthat, artdrivenby optimismandbeautyhas less intellectualpowerthan thatof

"serious"

art. The ideaofthe torturedartistis a cliche andmakingwork withstrong

negativeimplicationswhilecriticizingsomesocial standardismucheasierintellectually,

thanmakingpositiveworkthatlookstoward thefuturewith an openhand.

17

(27)

Bibliography

Audi, Robert. TheCambridge Dictionary ofPhilosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge

UniversityPress, 1999. 2nd ed.

Butlin, Martin,andEvelyn Joll. ThePaintings ofJ.M.W. Turner. Vol. 2 New Haven: YaleUniversityPress, 1977.

Cora, Bruno. "Gerhard Richter: TheExperienceofPaintingandtheKnowledgeof Reality"

FromGerhardRichter(Prado: GliOri, 1999)

Elger, Dietmar. GerhardRichterLandscapes. Ostfildern-Ruit: CantzVerlag, 1998.

Galassi,Peter. Andreas Gursky. New York: The Museum ofModemArt,2001.

Gilbert-Rolff,Jeremy. BeautyandtheContemporarySublime. New York: Allworth

Press, 1999.

Gray,Don. Letterto theSenateSubcommittee onEducation. April 5, 1990.

Hegel,G.W.F. Aesthetics: LecturesonFine Art. Trans: T.M. Knox,London: Oxford

UniversityPress, 1975.

Hunter, SamandJohnJacobus. Modem Art: PaintingSculpture Architecture. 3rded. New

York: PrenticeHall, 1992.

Jencks,Charles. Whatis Post-Modernism?: London:Academy Editions, 1989.

Kant, Immanuel. CritiqueofJudgment. TranslatedbyJ.H. Bernard. New York:

Macmillan, 1951.

Rosenblum,Naomi. A World History ofPhotography. New York: AbbevillePress, 1997.

3rd ed.

Ross,Stephen David. Editor. ArtandIt's Significance.Albany: StateUniversityofNew YorkPress, 1994.

Rothstein,Edward. ModemandPostmodernthebickeringtwins. The New York Times

ontheWeb, October21,2000.

Sugimoto,Hiroshi. Sugimoto. New York: Fotofolio, 1993.

(28)

Colophon

I wouldliketo thank thefollowingpeoplefor makingthisshowpossible:

MyCommittee:

Chair: Jeff Weiss Dan Larkin

Tim Engstrom Elliott Rubenstein

My ParentsJanieandBill andmy Sister Sarah

Kara Crombie Jim Johnson Andrew Wainio

And

Amanda Bauer

(29)
[image:29.513.61.454.56.583.2]

Figure 1 JoeBialkowskyUntitled 200130"x40"

TypeC PrintonAluminum

Figure 2.JoeBialkowskyUntitled200130"x40"

[image:29.513.62.453.343.683.2]
(30)
[image:30.513.61.453.40.677.2]

Figure 3. JoeBialkowskyUntitled 200130"x40"

TypeCPrintonAluminum

Figure 4.JoeBialkowskyUntitled200130ux40B

(31)
[image:31.513.61.454.41.688.2]

Figure 5.JoeBialkowskyUntitled200130"x40"

(32)

Figure8.JoeBialkowskyUntitled200130"x40"

[image:32.513.57.463.23.700.2]
(33)
[image:33.513.48.469.28.695.2]

Figure 9. JoeBialkowskyUntitled 200130"x40"

TypeCPrintonAluminum

Figure 10.JoeBialkowskyUntitled 200130"x40"

(34)

M

Figure1 1.JoeBialkowskyUntitled

30"x40"

[image:34.513.62.454.177.491.2]
(35)
[image:35.513.58.456.39.335.2]

Figure 12. J.M.W TurnerRain, Steam,andSpeed-TheGreat WesternRailway1844Oilon canvass91"x122"

NationalGallery,London

[image:35.513.62.459.362.682.2]
(36)
[image:36.513.59.460.32.603.2]

Figure 14. Hiroshi Sugimoto CaribbeanSea,Jamaica1980Silver Gelatin Print

Figure 15. AndreasGurskyRhine I1 1999 ColorCPrint 6'81/4"x1V83/4"

(37)
[image:37.513.65.456.41.632.2]

Figure 1 6.Mark Rothko YellowandBlue(Yellow.BlueonOrange)1955OilonCanvas102"x66"

(38)
[image:38.513.81.437.16.718.2]

Figure 17.Mark Rothko Untitled 1969 AcryliconCanvas68x60''

JohnandMaryPappajohn,DesMoines,Iowa

=igure 18.Donald JuddUntitled1989 Anodized Aluminium, Plexiglass

39"x79"x39"

(39)
[image:39.513.63.456.116.457.2]
(40)

Untitled 30"x40" C print

on aluminum

JoeBialkowsky2001

Untitled 30"x40" Cprint on aluminum

JoeBialkowsky2001

Untitled 30"x40"

Cprint

onaluminum

JoeBialkowsky2001

Untitled 30"x40"C print

onaluminum

Joe Bialkowsky2001

Untitled 30"x40"Cprint on aluminum

JoeBialkowsky2001

Untitled 30"x40" Cprint on aluminum

Joe Bialkowsky2001

Untitled 30"x40"Cprint on aluminum

JoeBialkowsky2001

Untitled 3Q"*4Q" Cprint onaluminum Untitled 30"x40" Cprint onaluminum

JoeBialkowsky2001 JoeBialkowsky2001

Untitled

30"x40"

Cprint

on aluminum

-I

9 JoeBialkowsky2001

Untitled 30"x40"Cprint on aluminum

Figure

Figure 1 Joe Bialkowsky Untitled 200130"x40" Type C Print on Aluminum
Figure 3. Joe Bialkowsky Untitled 2001
Figure 5. Joe Bialkowsky Untitled 200130"x40" Type C Print on Aluminum
Figure 8. Joe Bialkowsky Untitled 2001 30"x40" Type C Print on Aluminum
+7

References

Related documents

The main findings of the current animal experiment on MAP-normalization-targeted resuscitation are the following. 1) Bleeding that caused 50% drop in SVI led to severe disturbances

Oleh itu, jerami padi yang tidak dirawat berfungsi sebagai substrat yang lebih baik berbanding jerami padi yang telah dirawat dengan alkali untuk pengeluaran selulase

The Web Service Process Ontology WSPO [27, 28], which we have used for platform-independent modelling, is also a service ontology, but its focus is the support of description

The same group has demonstrated C3b deposition without evidence of C4b deposition in human kidneys with acute tubular necrosis [(20], showing that the alternative pathway may also

From the determination process of β , we find that the general heat conduction law can degrade to the Fourier’s law on the conditions of (i) negligible inertial effects

Website: http://redirect.state.sbu/?url=http://planetdepos.com/locations/germany Experience: 20+years of court reporting experience providing coverage throughout Europe

The network’s advocacy efforts have been successful, and have contributed to the inclusion of the following text in the Basic Act on Reconstruction in response to the GEJE which

AA Hybrida IS, oil palm hybrid semi-clonal seeds, is produced through a pedigree of selected elite clonal Deli Dura and the Dumpy Yangambi AVROS pisifera.. This pisifera is