• No results found

Does a cdc2 Kinase-Like Recognition Motif on the Core Protein of Hepadnaviruses Regulate Assembly and Disintegration of Capsids?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Does a cdc2 Kinase-Like Recognition Motif on the Core Protein of Hepadnaviruses Regulate Assembly and Disintegration of Capsids?"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

FIG. 1. Conservation of the threonine-proline kinase motif on he-padnavirus capsid proteins
FIG. 2. Viral DNA replication in transfected LMH cells. The figure shows Southern blots of viral core DNA (panels A I, B, and C) and cccDNA(panel AII) extracted from LMH cells (7) transfected with equal amounts of the indicated plasmids
FIG. 4. Infection of PDHs. (A) Southern blot of DNA extractedfrom enveloped virions present in samples of transfected LMH cells

References

Related documents

Reprinted with permission from the Canadian Association for Social Work Education (CASWE) Board of Accreditation Manual. Note: These Standards are subject to change. Visit the

South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.. Department of Medicine, Faculty of

The CSF examination in patients with scrub typhus with neurological involvement can mimic subacute meningitis-like tuberculous meningitis and viral meningoencephalitis?. A

To directly access a channel, simply enter its number with the 0~9 buttons on the remote control.. Channel numbers can be up to four

Heim N, Griesbeck O (2004 ) Genetically encoded indicators of cellular calcium dynamics based on troponin C and green fluorescent protein. Heim R, Tsien RY (1996 ) Engineering

Previous study about post-placenta IUCD, performed follow up in post-puerperial period (40-42 days), 6 months, and 1 year after delivery.. Acceptability of post-placental IUCD

Third quarter results showed continuing strength in the brokerage business and slightly lower earnings in the Market Making segment as Thomas said.. As compared to the year

Here the second speaker acknowledges the reason of the first person, as seen by the discourse relation be- tween EDUs 2 and 3, but then shows that there is a con- trast between this