0022-538X/91/105619-05$02.00/0
Copyright© 1991,American Society forMicrobiology
The
Nucleotide
Sequence,
5' End,
Promoter
Domain,
and Kinetics
of
Expression of the
Gene
Encoding
the
Herpes
Simplex
Virus
Type
2
Latency-Associated
Transcript
PHILIP
R.KRAUSE,
JEFFREY M. OSTROVE, AND STEPHEN E. STRAUS*Medical Virology
Section, Laboratory of ClinicalInvestigation, NationalInstitute ofAllergy
and
Infectious
Diseases,
Building
10,
Room
IIN228,
Bethesda,
Maryland
20892
Received5April1991/Accepted 20June 1991
The sequence of the herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) latency-associated transcript (LAT) region
resembles
that of HSV-1 only where theLATs overlapICPOand in the putativepromoterregion. Otherwise,the LAT 5' ends, kinetics ofexpression, and promoter elements are mostly conserved between HSV-1 and
HSV-2.
Theremaining differences betweentheLATs could contribute toeach virus's distinctive pattern ofreactivation.
After replication at the site of initial mucocutaneous
inoculation, herpes simplex virus types 1 and
2(HSV-1 and
HSV-2) establish lifelong latent infections of the sensory
neurons
serving those tissues.
Periodically, the viruses
re-activate to cause symptomatic or asymptomatic recurrences.
The patterns of latency and reactivation in natural human
infection differ for HSV-1 and HSV-2 (11). HSV-1
reacti-vates
more
frequently and efficiently from the trigeminal
ganglia
than
from
the
sacral ganglia; the opposite is true of
HSV-2.
The
latency-associated transcripts (LATs) are the only
gene
products
detectable during
HSV latency (2-5, 21, 22).
They are
transcribed from within the long repeats, opposite
in direction to and
overlapping
the 3' end
of the
immediate-early
transcript encoding infected-cell protein 0 (ICPO). In
HSV-1,
1.85- to 2.0-kb and 1.35- to 1.5-kb RNAs (the "major
LATs")
(9, 10, 16, 19, 20,
23-26) are
spliced
from an
8.3-kb
"minor
LAT"
transcript
(7), whose promoter
lies 600 to 800
bases upstream
of
the
major LATs (1, 6, 28). Evidence
obtained
by using
mutantviruses
bearing deletions
in the
LAT
and its
promoter
region
suggests
that the LATs
permit
or
stimulate
reactivation from
the latent
state(8,
12, 13,
18).
No
influence
of the HSV-1 LATs
onthe
establishment
ormaintenance
of
latency has been
demonstrable.
Latent
HSV-2
transcribes
asingle
LAT 2.2
to2.3
kb
long (2, 3, 15).
It
is
notknown
whether
orhow the HSV-2 LAT
is
proc-essed,
but
minor
LAT
transcription
has been
found
toextend
downstream of the HSV-2 LAT
(15).
The
HSV-2
LAT
promoter
element has
notyet
been
identified
orchar-acterized.
In
this
article,
wereport
data
regarding
the DNA sequence
of
the
HSV-2
LAT
and
its upstream
region,
the
specific
5'
end
of
the
HSV-2
LAT,
identification of promoter elements
possibly responsible
for
HSV-2 LAT
transcription,
and
investigations of
the
kinetics of
expression
of the HSV-2
LAT.
We
hypothesize
that
abetter
understanding
of these
details may
yield insights
into the differences between
recur-rence
patterns
of HSV-1
and
HSV-2.
The
HSV-2 LAT
region
wassubcloned from
plasmid
pGR90
(which
contains
the HSV-2 strain 333
HindIll
JM
fragment and
wasobtained from
Gary
Hayward)
and
se-*
Corresponding
author.quenced (Fig. la). Figure lb highlights the strong
organiza-tional and sequence homology between HSV-1 and HSV-2 in
the
region of the HSV-1 LAT promoter and in the area
corresponding
tothe
3'
coding
sequences
for
ICPO.
In
the
HSV-2 region homologous to the HSV-1 LAT
promoter
(bases -900 to -700), consensus elements
for
several
potentially
important regulatory elements are found.
These
include
aTATA
box,
upstream
CAAT elements,
acyclic
AMP
(cAMP)-responsive element-binding site,
Spl-binding sites, and a potential ICP4-Spl-binding site (on the
negative strand).
The
HSV-1 LAT promoter also
contains
these
elements in similar locations relative to the TATA
element.
To
identify
the
HSV-2 LAT promoter, regions upstream
of
the
HSV-2 LAT were
screened for
promoter
activity
in
anin
vitro
transient
expression
system by
using the
chloramphen-icol
acetyltransferase (CAT)
gene
as areporter gene.
Frag-ments to
be tested for promoter
activity
were
cloned
into
aplasmid
vector
upstream
of
the gene for CAT and
trans-fected
into Vero
cells. Protein
wasextracted after
48
h,
and
the extent
of
acetylation of radiolabelled
chloramphenicol
was
compared
for
the
different
constructs(Fig. 2). All
HSV-1 and HSV-2 LAT
fragments
tested
showed
promoter
activity. Thus,
promoter
activity
is
found in the HSV-2
sequences
which
arehomologous
tothe
HSV-1
LAT
pro-moter.
Direct
comparison of
the
activities of
the HSV-1
and
HSV-2-LAT promoters under
varying
and
physiologic
cir-cumstances
will
be needed
todelineate
the
functional
rele-vance
of
their
similarities
and
differences.
At
aposition
762 bases downstream
of
the TATA element
(starting
atbase
-3),
the decamer
CAGGTAGGTT
(itali-cized
in
Fig.
1)
is
conserved
between the
twoviruses.
The
HSV-1
major
LAT
startsite lies
onthe
second
G in this
conserved
splice
donor
consensussequence.
Moreover,
asplice
acceptor
consensussequence
is also
conserved
be-tween
the
viruses,
1.95 kb downstream
of the HSV-1 LAT 5'
end and 2.2 kb downstream
of
this site in HSV-2. These
conserved
sequences suggest
that the
HSV-2
major
LAT is
also
anintron
spliced
from
alarger
precursor,
asis the
casewith HSV-1
(7).
Primer
extension
analysis (9) (Fig. 3a)
wasperformed
tolocalize
the
HSV-2 LAT
startsite.
Adiscrete
reaction
product of
125
bases is
seenin
HSV-2-infected
Vero
cell
extracts
and is absent from the
uninfected-cell
extract.The
5619on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Sac I I
a CCGCGGGC ATCCGGCGGC CGGCCCCACG CCCTTCCATT AAGCACTCCC
Spi
-900 ACGTTGGGGG GGGGGCGCGC CAGCTGAGTG CTCTGCGGTT GCGGGCGCCG TGCCCGGAGA TCCATTAAGCCGCCGGAGAGCCCGAGCCCC GCCCGCGTGT cAMP respelement TATA Spl <ICP4 site
-800 TGCTGTGGGCATTTCTGCTGCGTCATCCCT GTCTTTATAAAACCGGGGGC GGCGGCAGCA ACGAACACAGGGGCCCGCCGCCGATCGAGAGGGACTCCGG -700 AGAAGGAAGG CTGCTCCGCG CACCGGCGCG CCCTTCTCCTCTCCCCTCCCTACCTCCCCCTCTCTTCCCCCTTTTTTCCC CCGCCTCCCG TCTTCTTCCG
Spl Not I
-600 CGCCTCCGAG GGTCCGCCTCTGCCTCGGGGACCCCCGGGC GGGCCGGGGCTCTGGCCGCCGAGGTGCGCCCCGGCCGGAGGGGCCCCCGCACCTCGGCGG Spl
-500 CCGCCCCCTC CGGCGCCGCG CGTTCGCGAAAGGCGCGAAA GGGGCCCCCGGAGGCTTTTT TCGATTCCCGGCCGCGGGTCCCGGGTAGCCGCCCGGCGCC -400 GGTCGGAAGG CGTCCCCCGCCCGGCGGTCC GGCCCGGGCCCCCGGCGGAG CGCGGGGGCCCCGGGGCCCC GGGCCGCGCCGGCGGCGTTTCCGCGTTCCG -300 TTTCTTCTCCCTCCCGGCCG CCCCGCTCCC GGGCCCGACCCTCGCCCCTTCCCTTCTCCTCGTCTTCCCC CGTCCCGCCG CGCCCCTTCC CTCTTCCTTC -200 TCTCTCTCTGTCTCGCTGTC TCGCTCTCCTCACATTTCCC CCCCCCCCCC CGCCGCCGCC GCCGCCCTCTGCCCGCGTCCCACCGAGACGCCGCGCCGCG -100 TGAGCCGTCC GCCCGGGCGACCCAGGCTCCGGGGGGGGGG CGCGCCTGCG TGTGTCTCGTGTGAGAGAGCGCGCCCCTCG AACGCCGCGC GTTCTCGCAG
LATstart site
0 GTAGGTAGGGTCGTACAG GTGAGCTTCT GCTGAGGCGG CGGGAGAGGG GGGGGCGGGCGGAAGAGAGA GAGAGGCAGG GGTTGGGGGAAAACTGTTCT
100 TCCTCCCCCTTTCAAGAAAC ACGAGGCGGG GGTCCCAGAA AGGGCAGGCA GGTCAGCCGC ACCGCCCGOCG AGCCAACCCGTATCCTTTTTTTCTAGGrGT Bam HI Bam HI
200 TTOGTrTGTTCGTI TTTTGTGTTT TGTTATTATT TTICGCGGATC CGGCGTGTTCGGATCCACCCCCCCCTTTC CCTTCCTCTT CCCTTCCACC 300 CACCCCCGTTTCCCCCCCCCCCCGTGGTGT CGTCCGGGGGCGTCGTTCCCAGGGGGGCAGGCGCGGOTCG GGCCCATACG CCCACCGCCCCCACGCGCCG 400 GTCACCCCCC CCCCAACAAC CCCAAAGGCGCGTGCCCGGC CACAGCCGTG GGrGTGGCGC CCGTCCCCTT CCTCTACCGC GTGGGCGCGGGCGGOGGGGT
Sal I
500 GGTGGTGGTAGTGGTGGCGG AAGGAAACGG GCCGGGGGGC CGGGGCCGCT AGGGAAAGGT AGGCACGCGC GCGGTGTGTCGACTTGCATGCCCCGCAAAA 600 CGCGTCGTGT CGTGTTGTGT CGTGGTGGGC CGTGTTGTGG TGGGCCGTGT GGTGTGGTGT GGTGTTGCGA ACGCGCGAGC CCCCTCGCCC CGATGGGAGT 700 CTCCOCCAG CCAGGGTAAG GAGGGCGG CGTGGCGGGC AGTGTGCGG GCGGGGTGGGGTGAGTGCGG TTGCATGCCTCGGGTCTCCTCTTCCTGCTC
ORF-1 M P R V S S S C S 800 CTCCTCCTTTCTOCCAGCCA GGGTGAGGAG GGGCGGGCGT GGCGGGCAGG TGTGCGGGCG GGGTGGCGC CGGGGCGGGG GTGGGCACGGGCGTAAGTGC
S S F L P A R V R R G G R G GQ V C G R G G R R G G G G H G R K C 900 GGGTGCATGCCTCGGGTCTT CTCTTCTCCC TCCTCCTTCC TCCCACCCGT CCCCGGGGGC AGAGGGCGTG CATGCGTTGT GATTCAACCG CCCTCGCCCC
G C M P R V F S S P S S F L P P V P G G R G R A C VV I Q P P S P 1000 CGCCCACTTTCCCCCCTCT CTATCAAAGTTCCCTGGCCC CTGGCTTCGC GCCGGTGGTGCGGCrGACCC CCCCCTCCTCCCTCCCCGAG CCAGGCGCCC
PP H F P P S L S K F P G P W L R A G G A A D P P L L P P R A R R P 1100 TCCCACTCCTGCCCACOACCCCCCGGGTCT GGCCGGCCAG ACGTGCGrGCTCTGCACGAT CGGGCCCCCC TCCCTGICAACACGGACACACTCTTTTT
P T P A H H P P G L A G Q T C V L C T I G P P S L S T R T H S F F
SpS
1200 AOCCGCCAGCCCGCCCACCCACCAAGACAGGGAGCCAGAA CGCAGGCCGGGGCCCCGGCTCTGTTCAIT ATAAAGACCAACAGGCCTOGGGGOOG
T R Q P A H P P R Q G A R T O A G A P A L F Y D K D Q Q A S G V G
GRF-2 M I K T N R P R G W G
FIG. 1. Sequence oftheHSV-2 LAT and homology with HSV-1. (a) Numbering of the HSV-2 LAT sequence is based on the 5' end of theHSV-2 major LAT (base 0). Positions of consensus sequences forregulatory elements and restriction enzymes used for cloning are indicatedabove the sequence. Translations of sequences which may encode proteins (potential ORFs 1,
2,
and 3) are indicated below the correspondingDNAsequence. A consensussequence,CAGGTAGGTT,whichincludes the LAT 5' ends shared by HSV-1 and HSV-2 LATs is italicized.A47-bp repeat sequence isunderlined. Bases which we were unable to identify after attempts using several primers are labeledN. Becauseof the strong secondary structure of the HSV-2 DNA in the region from base -386 to base -314 (which has a G+C content of >97%), someuncertainty regarding the precise sequence between bases -319 and -314 exists. (b) The degree of homology between the HSV-1 and HSV-2 DNA sequences is shown by light (40 to 60% homology), medium (60 to 80% homology), or dark (>80% homology) stippling.The3'ends of the HSV-1 and HSV-2 LATs are drawn on the basis of theassumption that the LATs end at splice junction consensus sequences shared by the two viruses. Positions of consensus sequences for regulatory elements (cAMP-responsive element binding site [CRE],ICP4-binding site [ICP4], Spl-binding sites[Spl],TATA boxes[TATA]), restriction enzyme sites used for cloning, the long terminal repeat(TRL), long unique (UL), long internal repeat (IRL), short internal repeat
(IRs),
short unique (Us), and short terminal repeat(TRs)
are indicatedand arebasedonthesequences of HSV-1 strain 17 syn + and HSV-2 strain 333.Protein-codingregions ofICP0andpotential ORFs (ORF-1 and ORF-2of HSV-1 and ORF-1, ORF-2, and ORF-3 of HSV-2) of the LATs are shown with thick arrows. Strong focal homology between HSV-1 ORF-2 and HSV-2 ORF-3 isindicatedby the blackportions of the arrows.on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:2.612.141.481.74.577.2]Spl
1300 CGCTTCTCGTICCOGC= CCCCCTCCTCCTCCCTTCCCCCCCCCCA TCCCCGGCCC CCCTGCGCGGGGGAGCTGCATCAAAGGCCAACAACAAAGT A A S R A R P P S S S S L S P P P S P A P L R G G A A S K A N N K V R L L V P A P P P P P P F P P P H P R P P C A G E L H Q R P T T K
TATA TATA
1400 GTGTCAAAAG CATCACAAAA CTTrATTGTAAAATTTTTATAAATATAAAGTTTTTTc TCAAGTTTTCAACAAGGCCP.GAAAGTCCATAACAAAATGC
C Q K H H K T L L > ORF-3 M C V K S I T K L Y C K I F I N I K F F F L K F S T R P E S P > 1500 TGGTGTGrGTTGCTTGTCG GTOCCCCCCCC ACTCCCACCC CCACTTCCTGTCTCCTCCCCGTCTTCCCCCCCCCCCACTCC:CCTGC
L V C V A V R G R V R P P P L P P P L P V S S P S S P P P T S P C P
Spi Sac II
1600 CcGGGCGCC TCGICCGGTG 0 CCTTICGGCA GCAAGCCGAG TGTTAGCTCCOCCTACTCCCCGTGGCCCGCGGGGGCGTCG
R G A S A G G P V G G G F P S G S K P S V S S P Y S P W P A G A S Sac II
1700 CCGGCCGCGG GCGCGCCCTG CTCCCGAGACCACGGGTGGCGCGACCGGAGGCCGTGGAAGTCCAGCGCGC CCACCAGGGT GCCCTGGTCAAAGAGCATGT
P A A G A P C S R D H G W R D R R P W K S S A P T R V P W S K S M
1800 TGCCCACOGGGGTCATCCAG AGGCTGrTCCACTCCGACGCGGGGGGCGTC GGGTAGTCGGGGGGCCYCAC GCAGTTGCGC GCGTGCTCGGOGAGCP.GGGT
L P T G V I Q R L F H S D A G G V G > Sac II
Not I
00 GCGCGGCTC CACGCGGGGGCCGCGGCCCGCAGCAGG7CCGCCACGTTCCCCGTCTGGTCCACGAGGACCACGTAGGCCCCTATGTGGCCCGTCTCCATG
00 TCAGGACGGGCAGGG CCCCGTGACCGTCTTGTTCA CGTAAGGCGC CAGGGCCAAC GCTCGAGACC CCCGCGATGG GCAGGTAGCGCGTGACGGCG
Sac II
00 GGCGCCGGGT Ct;CGGGCCCCGGCTCGGGCCGCCCTCCGCGTGGCGCGTCTTCCTGGCACACTTCCTCG GCCCCGCGG CGCAGCAGCG CGGNNNCCGA
spliceacceptor
00 wGwA.G0tC TCGTCTCC cAGcCC ACGCGGAcGC GACGCTCCCACCAGCCCCGCCCGCAGAGGA AGAGGCGAGCAWAGGAGG AGGCGGA 00 AGAGGAGGAGGAGGCGGAAG AGGAGGAGGA GGAAGAGGCGGCGCGCGGCGACCNGCGACGAC
ORF-2
b (119,462) POTENTIALHSV-1
-688 0 OPEN READING ORF-1 1954
FRAMES: O
iFI
W<,t
HSV-1 LATs
~I
.
2''
__~~~~~~~~~~~R- RF-3
POTENTIALHSV-2J ~~ ~HSV/
I I\ M I
HOMOLOGY: -_
U>80% *60-80* 040-60%* ~ __,
TRL a-UL IR 'IRS US TRS
EE
cn~~~~n1Ci
TIo
IItoT
IFIG. 1-Continued.
neighboring
sequence shows that the 5' end isatthe secondG of the decamer
CAGGTAGGTT,
atthesamebaseasthatof the HSV-1LAT. Anadditional
primer
extensionreactionidentifiedthe identical 5' end 91 bases downstream of the
primer
TTCCCCCAACCCCTGCTC(data
notshown).
Northern
(RNA) hybridization analyses
wereperformed
to determine thetemporal
orderof HSV-2 LATexpression
during
acute infection(Fig. 3b).
At 5h,
a small amount of2.2-kb LATwas detectable;
by
18h,the LAT concentrationhad increased
considerably,
and a weak bandmigrating
at191
20C
21C
22C
231
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:3.612.154.472.366.640.2]a T C G A U
C A G
>-125b--G
T A
T
-G -7;-iX T 7'
T
[image:4.612.339.531.76.376.2]R.a}I-, t.l Sac 11-No1
FIG. 2. CATassays to identify promoter activityin sequences upstream of the LAT. The HSV-2 fragments (Fig. lb) tested
included HindIII-SalI (bases --3500 to 577), SphI-SalI (bases --2500 to577), SacII-SaIl (bases -945 to 577), and SacII-NotI
(bases -945 to -503). The comparable HSV-1 LAT promoter,
which was contained in the 281-bp HSV-1 strain F Hinfl-PvuIl
fragment, and the emptyCATvector(pCAT Basic)wereused as
positive and negative controls, respectively.
b Lf) CO- CD
C > > x
D < < C)
22kb
-approximately 6
to 8 kb was visible. This band mayrepre-sent a
larger HSV-2 minor LAT.
Expression
of themajor
2.2-kb LAT
wasstill
detected in the
presenceofacyclovir
at5
and 18
h butwas markedly decreased inamountcompared
with
untreated cells. Cycloheximide completely
inhibiteddetectable
LATexpression.
In alllanes,
small amounts ofcross-hybridizing
28S
and18S
rRNA are seen. Previousexperiments showed
thattranscription of
thelarger
of theHSV-1 major
LATs isinhibited
invitro
by bothacyclovir
and
cycloheximide (9).
Inthis
study,
wefound that
cyclo-heximide blocked HSV-2
LATexpression and acyclovir
did
so to agreat extent.
The failure of
acyclovir
tocompletely
inhibit
HSV-2
LATexpression could be due
tothe lower
degree
ofintrinsic
acyclovir sensitivity
ofHSV-2
compared
with HSV-1.
Nonetheless, the results remain consistent,
with
HSV-2
LATbeing transcribed
aseither
abeta-gamma
or agamma gene. As has been
pointed
outfor
HSV-1(17),
however, the expression of
LATduring
latency, in the
absence
of other
HSVtranscription,
suggeststhat its
syn-thesis is
regulated
in a mannerdifferentfrom that of
other
HSV
transcripts.
TheHSV-2 LAT sequence
contains three
potential
openreading
frames(ORFs) which could encode proteins of sizes
214, 74,
and119amino acids
withATGs
atbases 784, 1267,
and
1496, respectively. The
threestrains of
HSV-1se-quenced
intheregion of the LATs (KOS [23],
F [27],and
17syn +
[14]) share
twopotential ORFs,
oneof
which (ORF-2[Fig. lb])
bearspartial homology
tothe
third HSV-2 LATORF
(ORF-3), with conservation of
38 of 44 consecutiveamino acids.
However, the HSV-2
ORF is truncatedto 119amino acids
compared with
the273-amino-acid HSV-1LAT ORF-2. It is thuspossible that
the LATs encode partiallyhomologous protein products.
Excepting this modest ORFsimilarity
andthe homology in
the ICPO region, the HSV-1and HSV-2
LATs
possessmarkedly different
sequences, anobservation which
does
notexclude their
functioning asantisense messages to
ICPO.
However,if
LAT expression interfered with theICPO
message,the
end result wouldFIG. 3. Determinationofthe HSV-2 LAT5'end and kinetics of
expression. (a)RNAextracted from HSV-2 strain 333-infected Vero
cells(lane I) and uninfected Vero cells(lane U) was subjectedto
primer
extensionanalysis using
the 18-mer CTCGTGTTTCTT GAAAGG.The results ofasequencingreaction(lanes T, C,G,andA) using the identical primer are shown alongside. The indicated
baseislocated 125 bases downstreamof the 5'endof theprimer. (b) Northernhybridization analysis wasperformedonRNA extracted
from uninfectedVero cells(lane U) andat5or18 h after infection
(atamultiplicityof infection of 4.5 PFUpercell)withHSV-2 strain
333 from Vero cells (lanesI 5 andI18), Vero cells pretreatedwith
the viral DNAsynthesis inhibitor acyclovir (lanes ACV 5andACV
18), or Vero cells pretreated with the protein synthesis inhibitor
cycloheximide (lane CHX 18). The end-labelled oligonucleotide GTGGAACAGCCTCTGGATGA was used as the hybridization probe in this experiment. The asterisks denote the positions of 28S (upper) and18S (lower) rRNAsontheoriginal gel.
presumably
beareducedrather thanincreased likelihood
of
virus
reactivation.
The present
study
revealedoverall
organizational identity
and focalsequence
homology
in the LATregions of HSV-1
and
HSV-2,
as well as similarities in theexpression of
theLATs themselves. These
findings imply conservation of
a genome domainimportant
tothe
evolutionary
successof
these viruses.Clear differences
between
the LAT regions of
the viruses have also been
elucidated.
Further study
will be
neededtoassess
their relevance
tothe known differences in
thepatternsof reactivation
of these viruses.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The GenBank
ac-cession number for the sequence
presented
inthis article is
M69065.
Wegratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Quentin Allen, Yolanda Yang, Jumana Kurawadwala, and Holly Smith. We
Cj ;|
Hinl'--Pv!,
HI
-Ale
srol!-S-. 0
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:4.612.109.243.78.245.2]thank Gary Hayward, John Martin, Stephen Wechsler, and Jeffrey Meier for providing clones and viruses and Duncan McGeoch for sharing preliminary sequence information for HSV-2 strain HG52.
REFERENCES
1. Batchelor, A. H., and P. O'Hare. 1990. Regulation and cell-type-specificactivity of a promoter located upstream of the latency-associated transcript of herpes simplex virus type 1. J. Virol. 64:3269-3279.
2. Burke, R. L., K. Hartog, K. D. Croen, and J. M. Ostrove. 1991. Detection and characterization of latent HSV RNA by in situ and Northern blothybridization in guinea pigs. Virology 181: 793-797.
3. Croen, K. D., L.Dragovic,J. M.Ostrove, and S. E. Straus. 1991. Characterization ofherpes simplex virus type 2 latency-associ-ated transcription in human sacral ganglia and in cell culture. J. Infect. Dis. 163:23-28.
4. Croen, K. D., J. M. Ostrove, L. J. Dragovic, J. E. Smialek, and S. E. Straus. 1987. Latent herpes simplex virus in human trigeminalganglia. N.Engl. J. Med.314:1427-1432.
5. Deatly, A.M., J. G. Spivack, E.Lavn,and N. W. Fraser. 1987. RNA from an immediate early region of the type 1 herpes simplex virus genome is present in the trigeminal ganglia of latently infected mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:3204-3208.
6. Dobson, A. T., F.Sederati, G. Devi-Rao, W. M. Flanagan, M. J. Farrell, J. G. Stevens, E. K.Wagner, and L. T. Feldman. 1989. Identification ofthe latency-associated transcript promoter by expression of rabbit beta-globinmRNAinmouse sensory nerve ganglia latently infected with a recombinant herpes simplex virus.J. Virol. 63:3844-3851.
7. Farrell, M. J., A. T. Dobson, and L. T. Feldman. 1991. Herpes simplex virus latency-associated transcript is a stable intron. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA88:790-794.
8. Hill, J. M., F. Sederati, R. T. Javier, E. K. Wagner, and J. G. Stevens. 1990. Herpes simplex virus latent phase facilitates in vivo reactivation. Virology 174:117-125.
9. Krause, P. R., K. D. Croen, J. M. Ostrove, andS. E. Straus. 1989. Structural and kinetic analyses of herpes simplex virus type 1 latency-associatedtranscripts in human trigeminal gan-glia and in cell culture. J. Clin.Invest.86:235-241.
10. Krause, P. R., K. D. Croen, S. E. Straus, andJ. M. Ostrove. 1988. Detection and preliminary characterization of herpes simplex virus type 1 transcripts in latently infected human trigeminal ganglia. J. Virol. 62:4819-4823.
11. Lafferty, W. E., R. W. Coombs, J.Benedetti,C.Critchlow,and L. Corey. 1987. Recurrences after oral and genital herpes simplex virus infection: influence of site of infectionand viral type. N. Engl.J. Med. 316:1444 1449.
12. Leib, D. A., C. L. Bogard, M. Kosz-Vnenchak, K. A. Hicks, D. M.Coen,D. M.Knipe,and P. A.Schaffer. 1989. Adeletion mutant of the
latency-associated transcript
ofherpessimplex
virus type 1 reactivates from the latent state with reduced frequency. J. Virol.63:2893-2900.
13. Leib, D. A.,K. C. Nadeau, S. A.
Rundle,
and P. A. Schaffer. 1991. The promoter of the latency-associated transcripts of herpessimplex
virustype 1 containsafunctioncAMP-response element:roleof thelatency-associated transcripts
and cAMP in reactivation of viral latency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA88:48-52.
14. McGeoch, D. J., M. A. Dalrymple, A. J. Davison, A. Dolan, M. C.Frame, D. McNab, L. J. Perry, J. E. Scott, and P. Taylor. 1988. The complete DNAsequence of the long unique region in the genome of herpes simplex virus type 1. J. Gen. Virol. 69:1531-1574.
15. Mitchell, W. J., S. L.Deshmane, A. Dolan, D. J. McGeoch, and N. W. Fraser. 1990. Characterization of herpes simplex virus type 2transcription during latent infection in mouse trigeminal ganglia. J.Virol.64:5342-5348.
16. Spivack, J. G., and N. W. Fraser. 1987. Detection of herpes simplex virustype 1transcripts during latent infection in mice. J. Virol.61:3841-3847.
17. Spivack, J. G., and N. W. Fraser. 1988. Expression of herpes simplex virus type 1(HSV-1) latency-associated transcripts in avirulent mutant HFEM: evidence for a new class of HSV-1 genes. J.Virol.62:3281-3287.
18. Steiner, I., J. G. Spivack, R. P. Lirette, S. M. Brown, A. R. Maclean, J. Subak-Sharpe, and N. W. Fraser. 1989. Herpes simplex virus latency-associated transcripts are evidently not essential for latent infection. EMBO J. 8:505-511.
19. Steiner, I., J. G. Spivack, D. R. O'Boyle, E. Lavi, and N. W. Fraser.1988.Latentherpes simplex virustype 1transcriptionin humantrigeminal ganglia. J.Virol. 62:3493-3496.
20. Stevens, J. G., L. Haarr, D. D. Porter, M. L. Cook, and E. K. Wagner.1988. Prominence oftheherpessimplex virus latency-associated transcript in trigeminal ganglia from seropositive humans. J. Infect. Dis. 158:117-123.
21. Stevens, J. G., E. K. Wagner, G. B. Devi-Rao, M. Cook, and L. T. Feldman. 1987. RNA complementary to a herpesvirus alpha gene mRNA is prominent in latently infected mice. Science 235:1056-1059.
22. Suzuki,S., and J. R. Martin. 1989. Herpessimplex virustype 2 transcripts intrigeminal ganglia duringacuteand latentinfection in mice.J. Neurol. Sci.93:239-251.
23. Wagner, E. K., G. Devi-Rao, L. T. Feldman, A. T.Dobson, Y.-F. Zhang, W. M. Flanagan, and J. G. Stevens. 1988.
Physical
characterization oftheherpes simplex virus
latency-associated
transcript inneurons.J. Virol.62:1194-1202.
24. Wagner, E. K., W. M. Flanagan, G. Devi-Rao, Y.-F. Zhang, J. M.Hill,K. P.Anderson, andJ.G. Stevens.1988.The
herpes
simplex viruslatency-associated
transcript
isspliced
during
the latentphase of infection.J. Virol. 62:4577-4585.25. Wechsler, S.L., A. B.Nesburn,R.Watson,S. M.Slanina,and H. Ghiasi. 1988. Fine
mapping
ofthelatency-related
gene of herpessimplex virustype 1: alternatesplicing
produces
distinct latency-relatedRNAscontainingopenreading
frames. J.Virol. 62:4051-4058.26. Wechsler, S. L., A.B.Nesburn, R.Watson,S. Slanina,andH.
Ghiasi. 1988. Fine
mapping
of themajor latency-related
RNA of herpes simplex virus type 1in humans. J.Gen Virol. 69:3101-3106.27. Wechsler, S. L., A. B. Nesburn, J. Zwaagstra, andH. Ghiasi. 1989. Sequence ofthe latency related gene of
herpes
simplex
virustype 1. Virology 168:168-172.
28. Zwaagstra, J., H. Ghiasi, A. B.Nesburn, andS. L. Wechsler. 1989. In vitro promoter
activity
associated with thelatency-associated