Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
9-1-2002
Between the ankle and the soul
Christine Carlson
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contactritscholarworks@rit.edu.
Recommended Citation
'Between the 'Ankfe
8r
the Sour
6y
Christine Lisa CarCson
Graduate Thesis
Master of Fine Arts, Fine Art Photography
School of Photographic Arts and Sciences
Rochester Institute of Technology
September 2002
Professor Elliott Rubenstein, Thesis Board Chainnan, SPAS
Professor Patti Ambrogi, Thesis Board Member, SPAS
lD!?-2-{62-date
IO/z../02-Lynne Bentley-Kemp, Ph.D. (candidate), MFA, Thesis Board Member
date
1Jetween tfie 54.nkfe ancftfie
Sour
'By
Christine Lisa Carfson
Graduate Thesis
Master of Fine Arts
School of Photographic Arts and Sciences
Rochester Institute of Technology
PERMISSION STATEMENT
L
Christine Lisa Carlson, hereby grant permission to the
Wallace Memorial Library
ofthe
Rochester Institute ofTechnology
To reproduce my Graduate Thesis in part or in whole.
Any reproduction will not be for commercial use or for profit.
Table
ofContents
Foreword
1
Preface
2
Skirt
Specific:
The
Her-story
ofClothing
3
The
Her-Story
andtheHis-Story
ofClothing
asArt
8
Skirt
by
Definition
11
The Fetish:
Chasing
theSkirt
12
Garments
ofMemory/Memory
ofGarments
15
Threading
Lightly.
. .TheEvolution
oftheArtwork
19
Exhibition Place
andSpace
21
Seam-ingly
Endless:
Art
Making
andStudio Preparation
22
Detailing
theDetails: Exhibition Minutiae
27
The Final Frontier: Thesis Committee Approval
30
The Exhibition
31
The Work Itself: A
Discussion34
Reactions
to theArtwork
52
After Much Ado:
Finally Writing
theThesis
54
Life Imitates Art:
My
Final Thoughts
56
Bibliography
58
Forward
When I originally sat down to draft this paper, I was completely stumped. I
honestly
didnotknowwheretobegin. I knewwhatI hadtowrite about myartwork andit's supporting
documentationin order to meet the schoolsrequirements, but that was as far as I could get. I feltapathetic atthe prospect ofwriting aweighty andintellectual paperthatseemed impersonal
and
dry,
both formyreaders and me. All Iwas sureof wasmy desiretowriteathesisIwouldbesatisfied with in the end, particularly since it would be forever housed in the annals ofThe
Wallace Library. Iyearnedforastrategy in writingwith afreshnewangle.
After substantial procrastination, accompanied
by
pages ofdeleted computer text andwads ofcrumpled paper, it seemed I needed a skeleton in which to build the
body
ofthe text around. I formulatedacrude outline.Methodically,
Iroundedouttheframeworkwithachronicleofmy experiences and the succession of steps that led to the execution ofthe artwork. I was
hoping by
retracing mysteps andrecallingall thatI didtocreatemy artwork, thewrittenaspectwouldbeeffortless. Itwas in sketchingthis initialoutlinethatI found my strategy. As aresult, this compositionis written inchronological order andrecapitulates theunfoldingofmycreative
methodology, the process of exhibition, discussion ofthe artwork, and includes samples and
examplesofthecomponentsthatcomprisedthisthesis.
My
strategy, it turns out, was to write a paperthat not only illustrated my ideas in amannerthatfitsmy writingstyle andpersonality, but intheprocess Iformulateda guide onhow
Between
the JAnkCe
&
the
SouC
Shewears veilstocoverherbody,notinshame, but inordertocontain and contemplateher innermysteries.
MarionWoodman,
Leaving
MyFather 's HousePreface
I amtheseamstressfor mysoul. I amdedicatedto the
inquiry
oftheskirt as a narrativevehicle. As I am shaped
by
my experiences, my experiences shapedthese skirts.Divorcing
the skirt from thebody
permits more universality, removing the distraction offlesh,
eye contact,smell, andhairsothat theintendedmessage and visualintimationsaremoredistinguishable. The lackofhumanphysical form also makes clearthat the subjects
being
explored are not aboutthefemale
body,
but ratheraboutthe female souland psyche. I amaddressing the impact ofissuesthat are
invisible,
playingupon the pun of"wearing
the heart upon one's sleeve". In essence, Iammakingthe
invisible,
visible. Withoutthefemalebody
present, theskirtbecomestransformedinto a
body
itself,
or perhaps, better stated, the skirts act as a stage or arena.They
arecommunicativegarments,operatingasvessels ofa narrative.
I am intrigued with the notion ofclothing as a
"vessel",
particularly in regards to theskirt. Itis also suggestedthat the female
body
is avessel, aform thatholds vitalbodily
organs,thatopensitselfto
food,
water, and airthatnourishthe vesselto functionandthrive. The female vesselis also a receptacleforsemen andthegestational apparatusforunbornchildren. Thebrain,
berthed in this vessel is also a receptacle forlearning,
cultural messages, verbal, and visualmessages, andisalso the station where thesemessages are classified. This samebrainprocesses
emotions:
joy,
sadness, rage, surprise, andhorror. Atthe sametime,
themind processes physicalsensationofsound,touch,sight, and pain.
It is alsomy beliefthat the womanis also avessel containing centuries ofoppression, sexualviolation, repression,andmessagesthatcontinuetoundermineher free
functioning
withinsociety.
Specifically,
fertility,
religion, boundaries(physical,
emotional, and spiritual), sex, andSkirt
Specific:
The
Her-story
ofClothing
You 'rebornnaked, therestis drag.
RuPaul
Clothing
ismorethansewnfabricsthatcovernakednessor serveasprotectionfrom theelements.Itfunctions as a secondskin, a
housing
forthebody,
awrapper. Clotheshaveahistory,
anevolution,they
areculturallyand classcodified, and repletewith mythological signification.Clothing
dates back approximately four hundred thousand years ago to a simpledraping
ofanimal fleece that shielded the skin from cold, snow, rain, and sun. Ten thousandyears ago woven textile fabrics were worn,
fitting
thebody
closely and providing the wearer better mobility (Kaiser 28-29). Researchers surmise that clothing was strictly utilitarian inthe beginning. Afur-bearing
animalwashunted,
skinned,andfashioned intoagarment and wornby
the very same person or their related
family
group.Clothing
was singular in purpose anddirectly
connectedtosurvival.Religion rears its head at thisjuncture with the
theory
that clothing originates with issues of modesty. With Adam and Even in mind, it is theorized in Ruth Rubenstein'sbook,
Dress Code: Meanings andMessages in American Culturethatmen werethefirsttocovertheir
bodies sincetheir sexual arousalismoreobviousthana woman's. As aresult,womenfollowed
suittocovertheirnakedness so as notto "seduce"themenawayfromspiritualmatters (17).
Researcher
Mary
Ellen Roach proposes that human beings have had a complexrelationship with clothing since its origins. People wear clothing for three main reasons:
protection, communication, and decoration. Items that provide protection include a bulletproof
vest,
hardhat,
warmboots,
and camouflage "fatigues". Communication via clothing begins adeeper investigation ofthis complex relationship.
Clothing
can signify an occupation with auniform,status withadesigner labelor a religious affiliation withayarmulke or aveil.
Clothing
can also reveal clues about the person who dons a particular style, color, shape, cut or fabric.Decoration or personal adornment addresses the projection of selfinto the public domain and
how that self is assimilated or accepted into that domain.
Colors,
tattoos,
piercings, current fashiontrends,jewelry,
andcosmetics allare signals abouttohowthewearerinteractswithThemostdynamic aspect ofclothing, andtheonethatismostrelevantto thisthesis, is its relationship and associations to culture, specifically American culture. To be clear, I am not
addressingfashion inthis work,whichis definedas "aperiod'sdesired
appearance" (Rubenstein
Dress Code
3),
but rather, I amdealing
only with the female skirt form. The skirt is a femalesignifier, a motif of
femininity,
and a fetishized object in the Western world. I embrace and utilizethis fetish through the absence ofthe human female form andtransform the skirt into abody.
I address culturehere forahostofreasons.Notall countries andculturesviewclothing
and color inthe sameway. Inregards to the skirt, its
history
and presentday
clothing traditions are notprimarily female. Egyptianmenin 2000 BCwore skirts, and oftenwore several atatime (Roach546),
the Scottish men wear kilts for formal occasions, and the Greeks have a pleatedshort skirt worn over pants, while in many African cultures men wear a
draping
offabric thatresembles a skirt-like garment. Culture also affects the colors ofdress. A colorforweddings in one culture may be worn for funerals in another. White in the Western world is
traditionally
associatedwith weddingsandblack is associated withfunerals. The people ofIndia wear whitefor mourning (539). Thecolor, fabricand styles ofclothingalsovarywithgender, socialstatus,
religion, geographic
location,
rawmaterials, andtechnology. Thisbeing
said, Iagainunderscorethat this work is directed to a Western audience where the skirt is relegated to the feminine
realm.
Technology,
wealth, and the rise of a middle class were the major factors in theevolution,
democratization,
and gender specificity of clothing. "As towns grew, specialized shops gradually appeared, runby
weavers, tailors, cobblers, and other craft workers who made clothes...Thequalityofclothimprovedasthecraft workersdevelopedgreaterskills.They
beganto cut,
fit,
anddecorate clothes inmoreelaborateways"
(Roach 549). The Renaissance gaverise
to the petticoat worn under elaborate skirts. Inthe 1500's Spain useda variety of materials to
create a stiffarmature orfarthingale to make women's skirtsbroad and roundedto increasethe
circumference ofthe skirt from the waist to the hem (550). The 1600's brought an increased prominence to petticoats, and bustles were introduced to push the skirt out further from her behind (551).
Women ofsociety wore tight-waisted corpulent skirts in the 1830's and 1840's with
whalebone or wire crinolines. The 1890's
"hourglass"
were
tightly
laced,
accompaniedby
a corsettopresent adainty
waistline (Roach 552). The lateNineteenth centurywas atimewhen women appearedphysically largerthanlife. Asawaytobe
fashionable and to show offher family's wealth, she was dressed in layers ofclothing,
high-heeled shoes, grand
hats,
and upswept hairdos.Padding,
puffed sleeves, featheredboas,
crinolines, and petticoats increased the girth of women. Regardless ofthe
heat,
women weredressedina stratum offabric. This fashion statementnotonly delineated social status, but was
also the
beginning
of women and girls wearingdiffering
ensembles to distinguish agedifferences
mostly because women were
living
longer and didn't want to look like theiryoungercounterparts (Lurie The LanguageofClothes 70).
I must digressto clarify afewpoints raisedintheprevious paragraph. Whenreferring
tofashions
being
embracedby
society, Ido not meanto suggestthatwomenweredelightedwiththe clothing
they
dressed in.Clothing
was not a choiceby
our modern standards; instead itwasoften decreed
by
the society and time periodby
means of what was considered proper andmodest. In some cases, women were beaten and placed in stockades for
being
"improperly"dressedwhileinpublic.
Conformity
to the societaldresscodewas associated withsurvival.The corset and crinoline were
beastly
contraptions that most womendetested,
butsociety mandated. In the second half ofthe nineteenth century, Amelia Jencks Bloomer and
Elizabeth
Cady
Stanton spearheaded The Women's Dress Reform Movement. The corset andcrinoline practically disabled women from moving and
breathing
freely,
which in turnendangeredtheirhealth. Inreaction, Stantonwrotein 1857:
Women's
dress,
too...howperfectly it describes hercondition. Hertightwaistandlong,
trailing
skirt deprive her of all freedom ofbreath and motion. No wonderman prescribes her sphere. She needs his aid at every turn. He must
help
her upstairs and
down,
inthe carriages andout, onthehorse,
up thehill,
overthe ditchand
fence,
andthusteachherthepoetryofdependence (Kaiser9).As aresult ofthis outcry, Bloomer introduced a new style ofdress for women with a
largeoversizedshirt andpuffypantsthattaperedattheankle. Thisoffered unrestrictedmobility
and aminor victory towards independence for women. Considered "an obscene and unladylike
rejection ofthe social order", the "bloomers" were the
beginning
ofwomenfinding
theirpowerwas, according to Susan B.
Kaiser,
thebeginning
of the realization "that clothing had somesocial significance"
(9). In my opinion, American women were not
fully
atliberty
to expressthemselves
by
wayofclothinguntilthe 1960's.Returning
tohistory,
the manufacturing of cloth was modernizeddramatically
in the 1700's. The spinningjenny
was invented which spun a number ofthreads simultaneously, thespinning mule did the work of200 people, and the steam powered loom invented in the mid 1780's spurred an immense yield of fabric for mass consumption (Roach 551). With the Industrial
Revolution,
mass production of clothing began and clothing was geared to allsocioeconomic classes. Thisincreaseinconsumption anddemocratizationofobtaining fabrics
by
various class groupsbegana rapid change inwomen'sfashions(553).
By
the 1900's dramaticrevisions and short-lived fashions becamethenorm. Women'sclothing became lighter in
dimension,
weight, and fabric. The crinoline was almost completelyabandoned. Skirts became the focal point of a clothing revolution. The hobble skirts were so constricted at the ankles ithampered the ability to stride down the streets in 1910. The 1920's
saw a moremasculinelooktowomen'sdresswith straightskirts(nomorehourglass
figure)
with ahemlineeitheraboveoratknee length.(Twenty
years earlieritwasshockingto see a woman's shoe or ankle, so imagine the changes afoot.) Slacks were slowlyinfiltrating
the wardrobes of womeninthe 1930's. Hemlines rose andfell inthe 30's and40's. Whenwomen were mustered to aid in the war effort, dress became far more practical; womenjoined "Rosie the Riveter" wearingslacksingreater numbersalongwith more"masculine" tailoredand practicalstyles."Masculine"
fashions were introduced and marketed
by
Gabrielle Chanel in the earlytwentieth century. Marlene Dietrich embraced this fashion statement and shocked the world
(making
internationalheadlines)
in 1933by
wearing aboyish suitduring
hertravels to France. Herattire was so scandalous that she was threatened to either change into a skirt or bearrestedby
theParischiefof police. I am sadtoreport she didacquiesce,but didweartherestofhersuit(man's
hat,
collar, andtie)
with the skirt (Rubenstein 109-110). It is amazing to think that herclothing was viewed as a threat, and that such an outfit would shock Paris and the world. It wouldtakemanymore years untilthe "masculine"wearforwomen wouldbe
fully
embraced.After the men returned from World War
II,
it's worthy to note that there was aPerhaps this "ultra feminine ideal"
was a reaction to the return ofthe men from war? Were women seeking repentance for entering the male realm? Was it through this regression to the femininestyle ofdressthatwomen were returnedto "theirrightfulplace"? Indeed itwas. Author
Ruth Rubenstein agrees and also credits the
baby
boom tothese factors. She notes that fashion designers like Yves Saint Laurant fueled these ideals with his introduction of the "Trapeze Line"and designed clothingthat emphasizedhips and theabdomen.
Harkening
backto the late MiddleAges,
this type offashion resurrected the "pregnant look" to glamorize maternity andwomanhood. In addition, breasts became a fashion focal point and the bodies of Marilyn
Monroe and Jayne Mansfield were considered ideal (Rubenstein 93).
Round,
ultrafeminine,
curvaceous women withchildbearing figureswere
highly
exalted.Post World War II fashions were deposed
by
the 1950's short sheath dress (sleek andform
fitting)
whichthen were traded forthe 60 's A-line ankle length maxi skirt and shifts thatwere lessconstricting. Englandrockedthefashionworldwiththeextreme miniskirt, showingthe
foot,
ankle,knee,
and upper thigh in the mid-sixties! At this point Western societiesfinally
relaxed a standard dressforwomen(553). Womenwere permittedawide varietyof choiceand personalpreference.
It is no wonderthen, at this very sametime, clothing enteredthe art arena as a viable
The
Her-Story
andHis-Story
ofClothing
asArt
Clothing
seizes a special role[inart]: layering, molding,interpretingand emendingthebody. Asmuch asclothingcanbesaidtohave traditionallyplayed a partinfixingwomenintosocialroles,
soit isthemedium which canfixand correct social oppression.
RichardMartin,Fall From Fashion.
Using
clothing as a means of artistic expression is a relatively new conceptfivedecades inuse. Since many "everyday" objects have appeared inart(i.e.: flowers inpaintings,
horses in sculpture and cars in photographs) orthat have served as appropriated art (a
bedpan,
musical
instruments,
orfurniture)
it was not surprising that clothing was conscripted and destined to be explored artistically.Clothing
in its mostrudimentary appearance and utility isuniversal, itis easyto
identify
andidentify
with, andit is acutely intimatefrom persontoperson and culturetoculture. Richorpoor,weinvariably
own atleastone articleof clothing. Weknowwhat clothing iscalled and we knowwhatit does.
Clothing
is also specific to age, gender, size,class, and social status. It can oftenpersonify ouridentity. As
Americans,
clothing is so centralto our life and culture, we seldom contemplate it in a larger context. It is in this "taken for
grantedness"
that clothingmakes such a prime subject forart, because
"clothing
are independentobjects, freighted with
meanings,"
commented
Carly
Berwick in the November 2001 issue of ARTnews(164).Many
artists have turned to clothing,as it is easierformost peopletorelateto.During
the turbulent and
highly
political1960's,
many artists felt a need to create work for a moreuniversal audience. Artists wantedtheir work to be more democraticand be seen
by
morethan the art elite, so employing materials like clothing whileincorporating
pertinent themes ofwar,feminism,
and politics were predominant. In her artist statement for her Steel WoolPeignoir,
1966,
Mimi Smith wrote, "The clothingpieces were based onthetheory
that people had moreexperience
looking
at clothesthanatsculpture,soif Imade sculpturethatlookedlikeclothes my ideas wouldinstantly
translate"
(Felshin Art Journal 72).
Clothing
as an object was neitherobtuse norforeign.
The 1990'sushered inagreat number ofartists working withclothing, namelythe use
that the use of empty clothing is a way of
"resisting
self images" and objectification (24). "Artists haveplayed withthedistinction
thatistraditionally
made between fashionand art: onethat is functional worn forwarmth,
covering and social status and one that is not"
(Berwick 164).
The largest producers of clothing art are women; obviously due to the repression
women have endured
by
being
subjected to a prescribed "uniform" from their culture. Inaddition, clothing is
historically
associated to the domestic realm in its creation, purchase,laundering,
and mending.Finally,
clothing as art also is an expression ofdemystifying
the feminineideal,
stereotypes,identity,
gender, and sexuality issues (Felshin 20). Artists such as MimiSmith,
EliseSiegel,
LeslieDill,
Mary
Kelly,
andAnnette Messagerhave explored themesonthe corset,
bra, dresses,
andlingerie.Reflecting
upon thehistory
ofclothing, it is no wonder that it remains a dominant theme in contemporary art, particularly employedby
women.Having
beenliterally
boundby
clothing at one time, women artists are now free to express themselves through the use of clothing intheir art. Even
today,
women are still boundby
clothing with the wearing ofbras,
nylonhose,
lingerie andthe genderdifferencesstill embracedby
society.Clothing
will continueto be an enduring vehicle for expression. I myself chose the skirt as I am still bound
by
theconfines ofthe skirt. When
dressing
for a party or formal occasion, I continue to conformby
wearing
long
gowns,fussy
skirts, highheels,
stockings,bras,
and slips. I do not feel "welldressed"
withoutmyskirtthatsignifiesme asawoman.
Perhaps women are freer to wear less bulk and have more choices than did our foremothers ofthe
1800's,
but are wetruly
liberated to wear what we wantto without fear ofreprisal? Richard MartininFall From
Fashion,
answersthisquestionhisway:...Our society is saturated with messages and images of what is
fashionable,
tothepointthat a part ofour self-image is
inevitably
formedby
the knowledgethatTheseissuesofinformationormisinformation,
interpretations,
whatisseen andwhatisSkirt
by
Definition
I love words. I like
big
words, and especially those that are spoken infrequently. Idetest redundancy. To me,
knowing
precisely what a word means and to use it properly isimportant - as is
investigating
word origins.Retaining
a host of words to assist with whollyarticulating my
ideas,
emotions, andindividuality
equates to power. I am a talker and I am a writer, sobeing
specific is of great consequence. As a result, I use adictionary
often. As Icontinued my work on this
thesis,
I looked up the word "skirt" as I knew it had multipledefinitions. I wanted to know how many different meanings there were. The correlations and
juxtapositions this single word embodied astonishedme, andhow
they
relatedto the issues andideasraisedinthecontext ofthis thesisare profound.
Skirt,
bothanoun andaverbis definedas:A garment
hanging
from the waist down wornby
women andgirls;fabric thatextends over or beyond something to affordprotection; an outer edge; a border
or margin; the edge ofa town; a
border;
topass around rather than across orthrough; topass close
by;
miss narrowly; to evadeby
circumlocution; as well as theold standardslangtermfor "awoman"(American Heritage Dictionary).
The definitions seemedto embody so much ofwhatthis thesis is discussing. Not only
am I addressing the actual article of a skirt, but the ideas of protection (both physical and
emotional), evasion(of
long
suppressed memories and accountability inregardsto the treatmentofwoman),andtheobjectification of womenandthefeminine ideal (awoman=
The Fetish:
Chasing
the
Skirt
Laura
Mulvey
composed an engaging book entitled, Fetishism andCuriosity,
fromwhich Iwas able to gather more ideas aboutthe subjectofthe
fetish,
particularly as itrelates totheskirt. Shewritesthat afetish ismost often associatedwiththe gaze,andthesubject enhances the phantasmic (6). "Fetishism triumphs as spectacle", she notes (4). It is my belief that fetishism beginswith visualcues, andthen goesastridefartherwith adesire totouchor occupy. In the context ofthis
thesis,
the fetish is not only the skirt, but also the fabric. The silky, soft,glistening threads glimmer in the
light-begging
the observer to caressit,
to feelit,
to wraponeselfin it. Memoriesof
touching
soft fabricsmake us wantto strokethemoncemore,justlikereaching to pet the soft coat of an animal. We know what the fabric feels
like,
it affords us pleasuretotouchit,
andweare rewardedwhen ourhandsrestonits fibers. Theskirt isafetish,
butsotoo isthe fabric because
they
workharmoniously,
simultaneously,fortifying
validityeach tooneanother.The skirt as a fetish is both
historically
and culturally embedded, and "fetishes aresupremely culturally
specific"
(Mulvey
8). To some men, skirts arouse more sexualitythanby
thepresence ofan actualwoman(Wolf 175). It isthemere objectitself divorced from
body
andselfthat arousesthe sexuality. The fetishreplaces the originaldesire. The skirt covers the
legs,
the upper thighs, andthe place where the legsjoin. It covers nudity, female genitalia where a
glimpse ofthis is domain isthe ultimate prize next to intercourse. The mystery of"what Scot's
wear undertheirkilts" isakinto the mysteryand obsessionwith whatis
hiding
beneathwomen'sskirts. As I began a conscious investigation into the skirt in
history
and in current Americanculture, theissueoffetish becamearecurringtheme.
Iturn toThe American HeritageDictionaryforan exactdefinitionofthisnoun. Fetish
I. Anobjectthat is believedtohavemagical orspiritualpowers.
2. Anobjectofunreasonablyexcessive attention or reverence.
3.
Something,
suchas a material object or non-sexual partofthebody,
thatarouses sexualdesireandmay become necessary forsexualgratification.The definition helped me better put the skirt into a fetishized context. As I
contemplatedthe
issue,
I begantokeep
mental notes ofhowIhavenoticedthismanifestedinmyexperiences and culture. Itwas
important
toprovethistheory,
andnotjust accept it. I wantedto observe countless examples in countless forms. What I found was astounding, and will
expandononlyafewexamples ofthesexualizingoftheskirt.
One ofmy earliest memories of grade school is boys chasing girls onthe playground
hoping
to pull up their skirts. No humiliation could match a group ofboys seeing our whitecotton underpants. The harassmentseemedunrelenting. Nomatterhow manyskirts
they
chased andwereable to raise, theirappetite forourunderwear never seemedtobe satiated. Inreaction, starting atthe age often, we girls opted to wear shorts under our skirts or abandoned wearingskirts altogether.
Currentpopular culture also emphasizesthefetish inoneepisode ofthetelevisionshow
Friends. Agrade schoolgirlnamed Susie Moss (Julia
Roberts)
nowgrown-upseeks revenge onChandler
Bing
(MatthewPerry)
who had pulled up her skirt in front of the entire schoolauditorium. Theresultwas absolutehumiliation for herandtheenduringchildhood nicknameof
"Susie Underpants". Eventhoughitwas atelevision character, itmade me wonder ifthe writer
ofthecomedy hadexperiencedthisin her
life,
untilIfoundoutthewriters weretwomen.Filmsdepictawealthof examples ofthe skirt-as-fetish. Intheepic film ThePiano, set inthemidto late
1800's,
the firstkey
oftheinstrument is"earnedback"by letting
amanlay
onthe floor so that he can peer up her skirt. In the 1992
film,
Basic Instinct Sharon Stoneexhilarated theatergoers with her celebrated panty-less
leg-crossing
scene, in which shedeliberately
exposes herself whilebeing
interrogatedby
male investigators. One ofthe mostenduring examples ofskirts and the male gaze is from the 20th
Century
Fox film The Seven Year Itch starring Marilyn Monroe.Standing
on aheating
grate inalowcutwhite pleated skirt,set horrified his wife would be so vulgar. It is believed that this scene was the catalyst which
broughttheirmarriagetoan end.
Inthepress, TheBritishRoyal
Family
was unsettled withits first"DianaScandal" prior
to her marriage to Prince Charles.
Lady
Diana was unwittingly photographed in a sheer skirtwithherbackto thelate
day
settingsun, which revealedthe fulloutline ofherlegs. Tabloidsranthis photograph worldwide, much to her repugnance and disgrace. Pornographic magazines
always include a photo or two ofa female model standing or reclining in a skirt before the
camerato reveal her panties, garter
belt,
slip, or even vulva. Books on manners and a "properlady's"
deportment have chapters onthecorrect wayto sit, with eitherankles orlegs crossed or
withlegs
together,
depending
uponthegarmentandthesetting inwhichthe sittingoccurs. As ayounggirl (unaware ofthe tabooIhadbetweenmy
legs),
I rememberbeing
scoldedmanytimesby
mygrandmothers tobemore "lady-like"whilewearinga skirt. Iwas not permittedtoplay inskirts orsit
"Indian-style";
instead I wasto situp straight, smoothmy skirtovermycrossed legsand actlikealady.
The forces ofnature have also wreaked havoc uponthe skirt wearer.
Wearing
a skirton a windy
day
required a woman's free hand to constantly either hold the skirt down or torepositionit afterevery gust. A soaking rain could turn that white skirt into the equivalent of a
white tee shirt within seconds. One ofthe reasons skirts were once so
heavily
layered was toprotect women and "proper
society"
from an unavoidable weather related flash of a woman's
shoe, ankle or knee. In
fact,
many women did not go out on windy days to avoid suchhappenings. Women were held responsible for this type ofindecent exposure and were
duly
punished eventhough itwas an act of nature. This makes one contemplate theratio of men to
women onthestreetsofChicago inthosedays!
I know I have overstated the skirt-as-fetish with copious examples, but it is in the
numerous examples thatthe fetish and enthrallment is bestemphasized and perpetuated. These
examples alsoadd evidenceto the
definitions'
use ofthewords
"fixation",
"excessiveattention",and"obsessive
preoccupation"
becausethis "material object"
(a skirt) does in fact "arousesexual
desire". In exploring the skirt-as-fetish, I am not renouncing it or
judging
thistendency,
butGarments
ofMemory/Memory
ofGarments
Memoriesare a selectionofimagessome elusive. Someprintedindeliblyonthebrain. Each imagelikeathread.
Eachthreadiswoventogetherlikeatapestry.
Thistapestrycreates our memories andthesememories create our past.
Unknown
While attending the Gianni Versace Retrospective show at the Metropolitan Museum
ofArtin New York
City
inthe late90's,
I was struckby
a quote usedby
thecurator ofthe showfromMarcel Proust's RemembranceofThings Past:
When from a
long
distant past nothing subsists...the smell and taste ofthings remained poised along
time,
like souls, ready to remind us...[of]
the vaststructuresofrecollection.
Indeed,
the constructs of recollectionare vast, and memories are promptedby
sensory cueslike sight, sound, smell, andtouch. Weare sensitive creatures and proneto reverie. Thesesensoryprompts arelike
booby
traps, which seemtospringout ofnowherewhen weleastexpectit,
and transport us away to an earlier place and time. The skirts I have created addressmemory both ofthe mind andthe body.
They
are intended to prompt memory, as many were created out ofmyown life experiencesand addressissues closetomy heart. We have all at one point in our life been confoundedby
a deja vu sensation brought onby
an odor or physicalsensation. It is my hope that my skirts would do the same, perhaps allowing the viewer the opportunitytoretracetheirstepsin
life,
ortofacelong
deniedrealities.Physical,
sensory, visual, and tactile memories, those we cannot verbalize but instead feel never leave us;they
become part ofthe "tapestry" of our psyche and personality. AliceMiller,
the author ofThe Drama ofthe Gifted Child researched child abuse issues in her book and writes, "our true, repressedlifehistory
is stored up inourbody" (7). Ourbodiesremember everything, and we cannot obliteratethepain, butcan expel it fromour consciousness and store itsomewhere hiddendeeply
inside (8). These remembrances resonate somewhere in our mindsandin our
body,
andperhaps, simultaneously. We can recall theweave and our desireto touch those fabrics we have a connection with. We also have recollections ofhow we have beenfabric cantransport to a place ortime that
incites
mightypeace ortowering
pain. Ouremotionalmemorybank is sometimes the greatest chasmto
face,
andwhymany choose to disregardtheirpast. All these sensory imprints comprise who were are and how we interact with our world.
They
moldand defineus.They
determine
howwe viewthe worldand interact withthepeople in our lives. "What is rememberedby
thebody
is well remembered", says ElaineScarry
(The Bodyin Pain 109).Like ourindeliblepsyches,fabric andclothing are receptorsformemory.
Clothing
and fabrics markseasons, occasions, activities, youth, and maturity. There are types of clothes thatare wornfor specific activities and venues: schoolclothes, church clothes,gym clothes, dressup clothes,playclothes,andworkclothes.
Clothing
signifiestimesand phasesin life.Whenalovedone
dies,
they
leavebehindtheirmostintimate itemsforfamily
members to sort, some ofwhich is their clothing.Clothing
outlives us, and often out wears us. It is alegacy. Itremindsus ofhow
fleeting
life is. Althoughthephysicalbody
hasfailed,
thedeceasedperson's scent and
body
shape lives on in their clothing. It is not uncommon for themourningprocess to spiral into chaos when the deceased's wardrobe is confronted. Peter Stallybrass
weighs the complexities of his experiences with mourning and clothing in "Worn Worlds:
Clothes, Mourning,
andthe Life ofThings",
inthe 1 993 edition ofthe Yale Review. Afterhis friend Allondied,
Stallybrass was bequeathed a prized jacket ofhis,
and interprets how the jacketseemedto "invoke" hisfriend (36). Hewrites, "Themagic of cloth...isthatitreceivesus:receives our smells, our sweat, our shape even (36). Clothes receive the human imprint (37). Cloth isa kindofmemory. When apersonis absent or
dies,
cloth can absorbhis orher absentpresence"
(38).
"I could smell him.
Dead,
he still hangs there in the closet, in the shape ofhisbody
impresseduponthe cloth, inafrayedcuff, inasmell", reflects Stallybrass (39). Thesewords hitaverypersonal nerve for me. After the death ofmy paternal grandmother, mytwo sisters, my dadandIwereleftwiththefinal
duty
ofcleaning outherapartment.Many
objectsbroughttears to our eyes, but it was her clothing that was most poignant for me. There is somethingremarkably incongruous about a closetfull of clothes thatwill neveragainbe worn. I
distinctly
rememberburying
my face into hersweaters,blouses,
and scarveshoping
toencounter eventhedidn'tseem
dead,
butrather suspended somewherebetweenthephysicalandmystical. Herspirittarriedinthe sweet smell ofherclothing. Solaceand anguishsimultaneouslyoverwhelmedme.
Aswe
flip
through thepages of our photoalbums,wemanytimescanvividlyrecallthefeel offabric we were wearing ina particular picture,wherethe outfitwas purchased, forwhat
occasion it was worn
for,
or how we felt when we wore it. The photographs also conjureremembrances offashion fads. We
laugh,
cringe, and reminisce aboutcolors,hemlines,
styles and patterns ofthe clothes we once wore. We canimmediately identify
outfits we adored ordisdained. Aversion to certain fabrics can also be rooted
directly
todistressing
events in ourlives.
Itchy
woolen plaid uniforms worn in grade school; corduroy pants that "chirped" as ourseemingly too-large-thighs rubbed together; slippery polyester ofmy deceased grandmother's
dresses;
acrylicfacemasks wornintheprocessof arobberyorrape; fabriccan remindus.A few years ago I was
helping
a friend pack her belongings prior to hermove acrosscountry. Inthe process, Iunearthedaboxofphotographs in hercloset, andwesat onthecarpet
tolookthrough them. As luckwouldhave
it,
I founda photograph ofthe twoofustakenseveralyears earlier. While Igiggled abouthow silly Ithoughtwe
looked,
she gasped. Inwhat seemedlike one motion, she snatched the photograph from my
hand,
vaulted to her feet and tore it toshreds.
Puzzled,
I asked her what was wrong. "That's the dress I was wearing when I wasraped",she saidsoftly. "After thecourt casewasclosed, that stupiddress was returnedtome. I
tookitto theback yardandburned
it."
Shemuttered underher
breath,
"Won'twear silkagain,itripstooeasily."
Stunned,
Igotupandheldheras shewept.Indeed,
fabriccan remind us.As agirl ofmaybethirteen, I was rummagingthrough our
family
cedar chest withmymother. I clearly remember her cooingwhen she opened a tatteredbox that contained several
diminutive dressesand shoes. It turnsout, mymomkept afewarticles ofclothing that each of
my sisters and I wore as children. When our
family
homestead was sold in 1997 and all ofthecontents were sortedthrough,mymotherhandedmeasmall whitedresswith
dainty
embroideryat the neckline. She told me it was a dress I wore when I was about a year old. I packed the
dress in abox and took it home with me. I safeguardthat little dress in a drawerofmybureau
andlookatitoften.
Inthe course of
drafting
this thesis, Itelephonedmymom and askedher why she hadpreserved our childhood clothing. She told me she kept it for manyreasons. She recalled that
other's were worn for an occasion
like
the firstday
of school or abirthday,
while some Mom said were favorites. Without furtherprompting, she continued. Mom mentioned that she held onto the clothes as a way of
"scrap-booking",
they
were not saved to be used again or to be handed on, kept strictly for the purpose of reverie. "Clotheskeep
well, papersdisintegrate,
andphotographs fadeandturn colors. Clothesare easyto store",sheremarked.
They
wereatangiblepart of her life and ours. She liked
having
three little girls; the small articles of clothing remindedherof when we werelittle,
sweet,cuddlyand smelled likebaby
powder. "The clothes couldn'tkeep
you small, but these dresses and outfits remind me of a time when you weresmall", Mom disclosed. She toldme she wished shehad kept swatches of eachofour garments tomakeaquiltwith(thiscomingfrommymotherwhorarelysewed anything).
Forme,
looking
atthisdress mymother gavebacktome commands acomminglingof heartache and wondermentdeep
withinme. I amforeveramazed at howsmall and vulnerable Ioncewas, andneverwillbeagain. I tastea
deep
griefin mythroatabouttheendandlossofmy childhood. Iwillonlycontinuetomature and growolder. Thewondermentis attachedtohardly
remembering
being
"that small". I can't remember when my legs were too underdevelopedto walk, I moved fromplaceto place carried in myparents'
arms. It seems strangeto thinkthat I
can't remember the feel ofmy own petite
body,
what it felt like to befragile, dependent,
and unabletodressandfeedmyself. Ialso get excited when Idreamofmyunbornchildrenwho willsomedaywear
tiny
outfits,andto oneday
explainwhy I have kepttheirclothing,as well.Clothing
is significantinourlife andto thosewewillleave behindafterwehave died.Ithashoused ourfragile bodies andmade statementsto thoseweknowandinteractwith. Ithas
kept us warm,
dry,
and stylish. Our lifetime ofclothing is a growth chart and is a gauge ofhistory.
Absorbing
stains like finger paints,food, blood,
body
odor, and ink...fabric is amappingof our life. Ifwecould assemble all ofthe clothingwe ownedthroughoutour
lives,
it wouldtell the story of what wedid,
howwelived,
and what we ate. We could recountwhat we did in certain outfits, which were ourfavorites,
and how and why the clothing articles wereultimately discarded. We could narrate how it was used as a napkin and
tissue,
a part of anensemble, a fashion statement, and how it
finally
ended upbeing
used as a rag fordusting
thehouse.
Clothing
would resurrect our adventures, events, emotions, and where every stain andtear originated.
Using
clothing as an art form seems so natural, as clothing and fabricstriggerThreading
Lightly... The Evolution
ofthe
Artwork
Asecretthingmay behiddenaway, ina concealedplace,
buta secretmeaningmustbetransformedintoa code.
Onecanbesimplydiscovered
by
the eye, theotherhastobe deciphered.LauraMulvey,FetishismandCuriosity.
The evolution ofthese "storiedvessels"
wasborn out of a single skirtI preparedforan
early R.I.T. Walk-Through. It was large and greenandshiny, created from aghastly bridesmaid
dress I wore for my cousin's wedding. The skirt installation incorporated mirrors and text with
themesofPandora's Box. Iusedadimmedroomand controlled
lighting
tothrowshadowsoftheskirt,whichadded an ancillary elementto the work. Thoughthisinitialwork was criticized, and
riddledwithtechnical problems,manysaw potentialintheideasand subject matter.
Overthe next quarter, I explored work
by
otherfabric and clothingartists, delved intohistorical documents on clothing, thumbed through contemporary and vintage fashion
magazines. I read feminists writings about women's garments and its context in society and
examinedmyownwardrobeandthoseof peoplepassingme onthestreet. I had discussionswith
friends,
watched TV, sketched, stitched up ideas...andthencompletelyabandonedthe skirt as apotential artform.
After
investigating
other mediums and subject matter andfinding
myselfuninspired, Ionce again returned to the skirt. I seemed drawn to
it,
rapt and intriguedby
its shape,form,
sexual and cultural
implications,
complexities and potential. Another Walk-Through was uponme,and I
feverishly
produced more skirts. Since one skirt couldnotincorporate andconveythemultitude of messages I felt wereworkable, Itook to the sewingmachinetoyieldfourgarments
ofvaryingsizes,
fabrics,
textures,and meanings.Again,
with controlledlighting
and a new collection ofskirts, I presented my work.After mulling overthe preliminary group's critique, whatfirst seemed like a catastrophe turned
toglimmers of success. The contradictorydialogues of
faculty
and studentstroubled me, as wellas the interpretations the audience members were discussing. Men and women had very
conflicting analysis, while some people had no insight or reactions at all. As I spoke to more
peoplethat
day,
I discovered manywerehaving
apersonalexperience andanemotional responsesimply marched out ofthe studio. I got excited and encouraged. I was fascinated that others
were
having
deeperanddiffering
interpretations
than thoseIhadoriginally intended.Since that show, I knew my final
body
of work for my MFA thesis would focus onthese skirts. Some ofthe work for this thesis was taken from that show, and many have been
modified andnewones have been
incorporated.
Asthe artworktook shape, I realizedthe storiesIwas
telling
through these skirts weredeeply
personalforme, sometimesbeyondwords. I foundthat each skirt had a voice and a gesture. Some pieces whisper, another may shout, some are
direct,
whileothers arehesitant.They
areentitiestome.Istruggled foratimeaboutrevealingsuchpersonal issuesaboutmyself. As Iread
Lucy
Lippard'sbook
Overlay,
I felt a sense ofreliefreading thatwomenmanytimes"explicitly
linktheirart andtheirbodies (46)"
and return
"directly
to ourbodies andpersonal experiences (47)"for inspiration. The creation ofthis artwork was cathartic because what I could not verbalize I
couldphysically create. The greatest freedomwas separating what Iwantedtheworkto address
and that which the audience interpreted did not have to be the identical and congruent. As
photographer Eileen Cowan said, "not all narratives have resolution (George Eastman House
Exhibition Place
andSpace
My
experiences of showing this work previously mandated a careful command oflighting
and environment.Technique,
attention todetail,
flawless presentation, and technicalexecution were key. Without the
darkness,
the shadows were not as prominent and the fabriclost its luminosity. Noise was a distraction. High ceilings were required to suspend the skirts
from. Installation oflight fixtures in the ceiling and concealing the cords were paramount. I
needed a spacein whichto create and install without restriction. Theseneeds led mycolleague
Rachel Smith and I to search for exhibition space outside of the Rochester Institute of
Technology's SchoolofPhotographic ArtsandSciencesgallery.
Early
in the winter of1998,
we began our pursuit of space in which to work andexhibit. We metwith
landlords,
walked throughmanybuildings,
drove all overthe city, bravedtwo massive
blizzards,
scouted parking, electricity and sanitaryfacilities,
andfinally
found thesuitable locale. We decided upon a three-room studio in the Artist's
Loop
at Village GateSquare,
signed a six-monthleaseand movedin.Dividing
the space was done prior to signing thelease;
it was the reason we selectedthis space tobegin with. Sincethe space met both of ourrequirements, neither ofus needed to
sacrifice. Thefront dooropenedintoareceptionareathatwasflanked
by
tworooms. Theonetothe left was generous with steel girders in the ceiling. The room to the right was what I was
hoping
tofind,
a spacewith ahigh ceilingandanintimate feel. (NOTE: See Appendixfor FloorPlan ofStudio B-3
24.)
Withtheapproval of our respectivethesiscommitteemembers, RachelandI set
Friday,
Seam-ingly
Endless: Art
Making
& Studio
Preparation
The very
day
we had secured the studio, I wentdiligently
to work. Aware that timewould pass
briskly,
I wanted to leave nothingto the last minute.Early
mornings, latenights, a lotofcaffeine, constantmusic,daily
conferences, andlibrary
books galvanized andinspiredme. I scheduled meetings with my thesis committee members tokeep
me on track.Relentlessly
Iread, created,
deconstructed,
drew,
stitched, whilelearning
aboutthefinerpoints ofsewing.Sewing
101: At this point, I must digress and confess. I failed sewing class in 7thgrade I
honestly
earned myself an "F".My
school was still bound to the notion that boys studied metal and woodworking while the girls learned to cook and sew. "HomeEconomics"
they
calledit apedagogy leftoverfromthe50's. Iresented anddetested it. I hadnointerest inanything domestic. I was furious aboutthe gender specificity ofthe class,
knowing
in my gutI wouldneverbeahousewifelike CarolBrady
orJune Cleaver. Irebelledby
notproducingafinal project for the class. While my fellow classmates were proudly showing off their handmade skirts and pillows, I sat apathetic, contemplated myfailing
grade, and hoped my teacher wouldn't notice me.Well,
thesewingteacherdidand calledmymothertodiscussthesituation. Ithink mymotherhadtobitehertongue andnotburst intoafitoflaughterthroughmost ofthatconversation.
Martha Stewart and my mother don't stand a chance of
being
friends.My
motherdefied the conventions ofdomestic. She wholeheartedly embracedthe Women's
Movement,
socooking, sewing, and cleaning were notespied
by
her as a "feminine" undertaking. Everyone in myfamily
tookpartin runningthehouse.My
motherbelievedthatbeing
ahousewifewith allitschores, trappings, and archetype was a fate paralleled to prison
life,
so she went to work in business.Incredibly
wedidown asewingmachine, but it onlycollecteddust inthebasementandwas
finally
thrown out. We daughterswereindoctrinatedtobelieve we coulddo anythingwe set our minds to, were taught to view ourselves as equals to men, andto reject sexual division in laborand status. Through my mother's example, I too came to renounce andbe critical ofthe domestic.Onthepolar opposite side ofmymother, satmypaternal grandmother who could
knit,
sew, crochet and kept an immaculate house. Although Nana was head nurse at a New York
hospital andwell respected in herprofession, she was in every way ahomemaker. Shewasthe
to teach me to sew and cook,
dismissing
them as old fashioned and irrelevant. Sure I couldreplace a
button,
but that was the extent ofmy sewing prowess. Howit was I came to sewingfrom,
photography as aform of artistic expression perplexed and amused both my mother andmyself. Itwas ironic then thatI wasto inheritmy Nana's beloved vintagesewingmachine after
she passedaway, twoweeksbefore Ibeganschool atR.I.T. Perhaps itwas an omen.
Entrenched in my
thesis,
I began to regret rebuffing my grandmother's offers ofassistance. I also beganto realizethatalthoughsewing has been
long
viewedas afemaletask, itwas merely a means to an end. It was a productive and meaningful skill to master. I also
discoveredthatsewingwas rathermeditative, andlackedtheassociations ofbondage mymother
equatedwithit. Inthe end,Rachel taughtmehowtobestworkthesewingmachine, as Iretained
very little from my 7th grade class. I studied clothing patterns, experimented with
fabrics,
conferenced with the staff at almost every fabric and sewing store within a 25 mile radius of
downtown
Rochester,
NewYork,
looked at how my own clothes were constructed, learnedintricate sewingtechniques, andkepton sewing. Muchto mysurprise,my sewing improvedand
theskirtstookshape.
Addressing
the Walls and Floor: One cold morning it was time to deflect myconcentration from skirtmaking and address the issues of
lighting
and environment. The roomhad a window and an auxiliary door I didn't want to use. The door and window needed to be
transfigured into one contiguous wall, which required some minor construction. Thanks to my
father,
I was competent with the finer points ofdrywall,
tape, compound, and sanding. Afterafew days ofintensive construction work, I was pleased
by
the seamlessness ofthe section, andwas humored
by
the fact that I could indeed sew and do drywall! (If only my sewing teachercould see me now!) After the final sanding was complete, I primed and painted the walls. I
selected a
deep
gray for the walls and the floor a matte black to best promote shadows andpreventlight
bouncing
intheroom.In addition to painting my studio, Rachel andI paintedthe reception room walls with
freshcoat ofwhite paint. Sincethiswouldbethefirst impressionof our shows andbearourtitle
lettering,
we wantedthe walls to lookcrisp. Fans randay
and night fora weektoventilate thepaintfumes. Wethoughtthestudio space shouldbe
inviting
sopeople could spendtimewiththework, without the distractions and unpleasantness ofthe construction and installation process.
along. I didn't want the studio to appear
temporary
or newly finished to merely house theexhibition.
Lighting
and Shadows: As the skirts were completed, I spent countless hours athardware stores scouting
lighting
fixtures, learning
about electricalinstallation,
and consideredlight sources and techniques. I needed to light not only the front of the skirts, but some
necessitated abacklight or
illumination
fromthe innerrecesses ofthe work. Atthe same timeI neededto cast precise shadows. Aftertesting
avarietyoffixtures,
I decideduponatypeoftracklighting
with incandescent bulbs forthe majority ofthe skirts. I ruled outhalogenlights asthey
burntoovisuallyandphysically hot.
By
lateMarch,
the calendar and the mirror became my worst enemies. One told how little I was sleeping as itreflected dark circles undermy sunkeneyes, whilethe otherinformedmetherewasn'tmuchtime tosleep. Iwas at a crossroads. I neededtoputthelast seamsinto the
skirts andinstallthelighting. This meantIwasnearingtheend;the show wasonlyweeksaway. Uponthecompletionofthe skirts, Iagain met withmythesiscommitteeforthefinalapproval.
Evenwith a
towering
ladder,
I hadto standonthe tips ofmytoes tomount the skirts into the ceiling. Some skirts wereto stayfirmly
in place, while others I wantedto swing andmove with the air current. The installation was
tricky
because I wanted an etherealfloating
presence withoutdetecting
thefishing
line. As aresult,Iexperimentedwithdifferentstrengths of filament.Withthe skirts
finally
situated, I could nowmapoutthelighting. The 20 footexposed beam ceiling hadnoelectrical wiringwhatsoever;thereforeIhadtorun wiresfromtheoutlets onthefloor upthewallsandintothe
fixtures,
makingsurethey
were paintedtoblendwiththewalls andwellhiddenfromview. Thankstomysix-foot-twoassistant, the tracksoflighting
wentup in afewdaysaftermanyrepositionings.The skirts were lit and relit. I had to rearrange some ofthe skirts to better suit the
placement ofthe shadows. It was also necessary to fashionsnoots and diffuserstodistribute the
light. The
lighting
becamethemostdaunting
andexactingcomponent oftheshow. Itwas crucialto ensure each skirt had equal
illumination,
as I did not want any skirt to seem like the focalupon the skirts required the
fixtures
to be placed high on the wall or ceiling so that audiencemembers would not casttheirown shadows uponthe work, the
floors,
orwalls.There werethree skirtsthat required additional
lighting
equipment. One ofthe smallerskirts required a small low wattage light. It took a bit oftrial and error until I decided upon a
small
battery
pack and book light so that no wireswould bevisible fromthe front ofthe work.Thered skirt neededtobelit fromwithin andagain,a smalllightwas fashionedsoas nottobe
visiblewhen the hole inthe skirt was peered into.
Again,
I struggled withthe brightness ofthe fixture so as not to over light the inside ofthe skirt and wipe outthe red reflective glow. TheCommunion skirt, thelargestofthem all,was aformidabletask. Itrequired asmall shaftoflight
to fall about 13 feet through the
body
ofthe skirt to it's hem. I spent the betterpart ofaday
perfecting it.
The last
lighting
issue was the entry door into the studio. Since the reception roomneededtobewell
lit,
I hadtodeviseameans forthe viewertoenterthe spacediscreetly
and withthe least amount oflight coming in with them. I used a sexy black satin that was lined with a
black cotton fabric to make a dense curtain. It not only blocked and absorbed
light,
but it wasalso an experience to transition into the space.
Having
to touch the fabric to enter gave thevieweratactileand active rolein
beginning
toexperiencethework. In someways, Iwantedittofeel like
being
in a skirt. I also likedthe encounter, if only for asecond, ofbeing
enveloped inthefabric. Itried to capitalize ontheanticipationthatapersonwould havepriortowalkinginto
the room. The black curtain added to the mystery ofthe space, the only clues the person had
before pulling backthe curtain was thetitle. I wanted a
feeling
of apprehension andanxietytobepresent. Withoutclues as to what wasbehindthecurtain allowedtheviewerto nothave any
preconceived notions before entering the studio. (NOTE: See Appendix forStudio Diagram for
theplacementoftheskirts.)
Sight and Sound: What I envisioned and strived to fulfill was a quiet and
contemplative spaceinwhichto interactand encounterthework. Ihadonce consideredaddinga
soundelement, but I foundthevisual stimulation sufficient. I didnot wantto givetheaudience a full sensory experience.
My
intentionwas to allowthem to form their own connections and tonotbombardthemwithaplethoraofinformation.
The other occurrence I desired was the motion the audience's presence had on the
added yet another dimension to the overall installation.
Empty floating
skirts gyrating slightly,trembling,
breathing,
approaching andretreating; themovement added anadditional"life"
to the
seeminglyuninhabited skirts. I installedthe skirts sothat
they
would moveandinteractwiththeDetailing
the
Details:
Exhibition
Minutiae
In March and April of
1999,
as Rachel and I continued readying our artwork, wecharted our advertising and signage strategies for opening night andthe weeks ofexhibition. It
was imperative to
keep
a calendar at the ready to ensure we had adequate time to meet alldeadlines and to plan sufficient time to get our press releases out in the papers and our
announcement cards printed and mailed. We were cognizant of our necessity to advertise our
shows since itwas offcampus. We also neededtoplanamenuforourreception, as neitherone
of us wantedtocook or prepare anythingbeyondour artwork.
Announcement Cards:
Using
the company Modern Postcard based inCarlsbad,
CA,
Rachel andIdecidedupontwo sided, 4.25 x6 inchannouncement cardand wenttowork onthe
design. We fused visual themesfrom our workand scanned in a tape measure, fabric patterns,
blueprints and a minor amount oftext.
Using
Photoshop,
together we created a mutuallyagreeable layout with an end result both alluring and enigmatic. On the verso we added our
pertinent
information,
saveditondiskand senditoffto thecompanyforprinting.The cards were completed and the order of 500 was received in plenty of time.
Togetherwe assembled amailing list ofartists,
faculty, friends,
and members ofthe art, photo,and videoworld. Rachel andIknewthemany benefitsofsharing a show: notonlycouldwesplit
our expenses butwecould also shareouraudiencetoincreaseattendance.
Sitting
onthe floorofmyapartmentwe printedthe
labels,
attachedthemto the cards,affixedthepostage and sentthemin late March. The remaining cards were placed in student and teacher's R.I.T. mail
folders,
affixed to
faculty
doors and bulletinboards,
and piles were left in local stores,libraries,
andgalleries. (NOTE: See AppendixfortheAnnouncement
Card.)
Press Releases: Inadditionto theannouncementcards,we wrotetwoversionsof press
releasesand sentthem outto the local Rochester papers, to papers in Buffaloand
Syracuse,
andto our local home newspapers. Our promptness was rewarded
by having
each press releaseprinted in each ofthe papers (without any typographical errors) for four weeks. (NOTE: See
Appendixfor Press Releasesand printed versionsfromthe newspapers.)
Catering: With all the hard work we wereputting into our show, it felt importantto
plan a fantastic opening celebration. Our intention was to create an atmosphere where people
wantedto lingerandnot rush offtohave dinner. We wantedour audienceto stay andenjoynot
met with several caterers. We ordered avariety ofdelicaciesto feedthe crowd. Inaddition, we
bought cases ofwine, soda and
juices,
and asked afewfriendsto tendbar.Going
theextramilewe purchased color coordinated cups, plates, glasses, candles and napkins. Thanks to our
landlord,
wewere ableto hostthe reception outsidethestudio inthelarge spacejust beyond ourdoor. This way the reception room wouldbe relatively empty andtheexhibitions would not be
overwhelmedwithnoise.
Signage/Vinyl Lettering: Because the location ofour studio within the Village Gate
Squarewasalittle difficultto
find,
we wanted our studio address postedoutsidethestudio door.In addition, we wanted
lettering
with the titles of our shows and our names for the walls. Ourfellow M.F.A. colleague, Sangdal Lee offered to do it for us free of charge as a way to
congratulate uson our show.
Again,
Rachel andI sattogetheratthecomputer andfinalized ourlettering. With all the expertise and machinery at his
disposal,
he generously sent us the finalself-adhesivevinyl
lettering
withindays.Installing
thelettering
was a tedious and painstaking task. With exact measurementsand attentiontosquare and
level,
wetapedupthefirstphase ofthelettering. I suddenlyregrettedhaving
such along
title! After checkingthefirst phase oftheprocess again, weburnished themontothewall. Inthe end, the titlesmadethespacelookcomplete.
Gallery
Hours: Sinceour showwas offtheR.I.T. campus,we wanted ourcolleagues,faculty,
and the general public to visit the gallery. We also anticipated a handful ofcuriosityseekers who would stop in while shopping, eating, or visiting other artists atthe Village Gate
Square. Rachel and I established mutually agreeable times and dates to be at the gallery. We
divided the time, and kept ourhours as scheduled...even when sleeping or socializing seemed
moredesirable.
Artist's Statement and Acknowledgements: Ittook little efforttocompose myartist
statement, as I derived much of the wording from my thesis proposal, press releases, and
research I had done while creating the artwork. It seemed to flow out as a result of
being
soenmeshed withtheworkforsuch an extended period oftime.
A list of acknowledgements seemed appropriate to exhibit adjacent to my artist's
statement. Itwas necessaryformeto listthenames ofthose who had helpedmealongthe way.
Friends, family,
colleagues, and fabric store clerks played an indispensable role in this show.alter, and enhance my work.
Displaying
the names was a modest gesture to declare mygratitudeand esteemto thosewho supported me.
Thesetwostatements were situatedontheleftwallasone enteredtheexhibitionspace.
An elegant presentation of