Strength analysis of steel-concrete composite beams in combined bending and shear
31
0
0
Full text
(2) 1. & ( 2 3. # ). ' %. % * #. % '. # )%* +,-+ (. '. '. 4. !. 43 2,5+. % # .. # #. 6. % +1+5 '. 2 7 882:. 3;$. 7 888:. 7 889:. 7<. 881:. ' <. 7 8=+:. +. *. 7 85+:.
(3) &. #. 7 8=8:. ;. 7 8=5:. ;. ). 7 88 :. ' #. 7 8=+:. 7 8==:. 7 8==:. ). > ?. #. 7 89=:. @. . >. 4. 1. ?. 7 8=,:.
(4) @. ; >. ;. ). 7 8=8:. 7 88,: %. 7 888:. 7 88=:. >. ! 4(%. %. %. A #. 7+,,,:. @ $. 7+,,,: ! @. >. 7+,,+: ! 4(% $. 3. 7+,,2 :. @. 2.
(5) 6. !. ! 4(%. 9 1 7+,,+:. 6. @B 1 A. @. > $. -.
(6) 7C. 73. +,,+:. ( +,,," 3. $. +,,2 :. +. A. ?. D. ' , +-. % @. @. ; $. 9. 3. &. D.
(7) $. +. # #. #. 7 8=-:. σ =. σ. (. ). γ ε Bε D γ − + 7ε B ε D :γ D. " ε. E. 7 :. E. " εD E. D. γ =. D. A&. D. 1+ 2. εD. ,2. D. !. 5. ". E. γ. 1. + --. @ 2+ - A&. D. ". 7+:. , ,,+ $. 1.
(8) @. 9 @. , ,=19. @ >. @ $. 2 @. @. >. > $ >. @. . 7! @. +,,+" 3. +,,2 :. =. ,.
(9) @ @. @. =ϕ. ϕ = 7 −ε Bε. :. ϕ =,. ε E. E , ,,-. 71:. ε ≥ε. 72:. >. @. &. ϕ = , 87 888:. *. ε <ε. @ @. ε. ϕ. @. 3. 7+,,2 :. 7 88,:. %. @ $ +. &. 8. 6.
(10) @ #. E 3 @. ;@. > 7' :. #. !. @. 7 892:. --. $. - A >. $. 1×9. + × 9, 1 × 9, $ $. 9. ,. 9.
(11) 282 @). 8- 1F. 7α :. B. 7' :. #. !. @. 7 892: B , 2 , - , 5+ +- 1 -. , --. +-. 5-. + 5-. ,=. % #. !. @. 7 892:. A. B $. 5 @. $. 5. ,. - +,.
(12) B B. 6. *. B B αE ,2. ,-. $. 5. !. B @. $. = B. $. = *. @ B. =,2 @) +. 218 @).
(13) % +1+5. 7 889: =-F. !. ". !. !. % +1+5 2 7 882:. 7 889: '. 3;$ 7 888:. 7 8==:. ,= >. 3 # $. 7+,,, +,,+: !. @. 7 892:. - G. A. $. 8 $. 7β :. 1. 8.
(14) β>. 7 8==: *. $. 8. +8 -F. # $. ' @ @. =. ( + , +8- β ). 7, ≤ β ≤ :. E. " 7. :". 7-:. E. >. βE. 7. $. 2. :. ,. @.
(15) @. =. +. E. 79:. ". 7). E. 8=8: 7. :. @. =. D. =7. 9. E. +. ( ) D. B1. 75:. 7A& :". :. E. E. E $ @. '. 75:. -. 7. +. +. :7. −. :. E.
(16) = Iπ 7. +. :++ H. =π7. +. :. E. " ". 7. :. 7. 7=:. :. 78:. E. ". E. E. 7A& :. '. 7=:. 78:. 7. !. 88 :. = , 9α. E. 7 ,:. 7A& :". @. " α. E. ". α E. E @. ,. @. 9. @.
(17) !. % +1+5 7 889:. '. 2 7 882:. .. . + . = . 9. 9. 7. E E. ". ". E. ". E. $ $. =. =. 7. : 7G. !. 888" 7. 7. % +1+5. 889" '. 2. 882" 3;$. 888:. :. ' :. $ B. 5. =. 7-:. :.
(18) B. 7. B. :. α. B. @. ' 7. @. :. @ B. ). B. =.
(19) @. 73. +,,2 : @. %. &. @ ;. & 6. #. @. '. E. J. ". E. ". E. ". E. ". E. 8.
(20) D. E. ?. K. E. ?. K. " ". E. ". E E. ". E. ". E. ". E. @. ". E. @. ". E E. ". E. ". E. ". E E. @. ". E E. ". E E E E α. E. " B. α=. B. ". +,.
(21) α. E. β. E. γ. E. ε. E. εD. E. ε. " " " " D. E ε. ". E. ε. E. ε. E. ν. E. σ. E. σ. E. ϕ. ". " " " &. K. " " ". E. (. !. &. #$% 7+,,+: .. ". @. C. ; ;. A. ;. A 7 88,: L) M&. ; * < M(. ; & $). $ & *$. A $(. $'!. A 7 8=+: L +, 51 +-- +59. +. $ 1-7 : = =5. %.
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
(24) ; >. J. ). A 7 8=8: L M&. ;. A. ; M -$ !. %. A ; %. $. A 7 88 : L% $. ' %. !. 575:. =85 8 , $. A 7 88=: L) M -$ !. %. *. A #. ; ' 7+,,,: L). M -$ ! N #. $. % %. # *. !. Q. .. 3. 3 # &. #. -=. 7 88 :. *. !. / $ - 28 92. < # 7 89=: L R(. $). +2. $ & *$. $ 1+ +- 18. $. 7 88,: L $!. 2=. < ? ; 7 888: L). 3. M -$ & ?. $ +27 ,:. $ +979: 99+ 952. ) '. A. $. $'. M4 ) %. $ 1+7 : 98 52. $'!. $ 2 9- 9=1. !.
(25) σ. ) *). ,. ε. ε. ) +) %. +-. ε.
(26) -,. 2,. σ. 1,. +,. ,. , ,. , ,,. , ,,+. , ,,1. , ,,2. , ,,-. ε. σ. ) ,) %. ,. ε. ε. ) -) %. +9. ε. , ,,9.
(27) ) .) #. 7#. !. @. 892:. 9,, -,, 2,, 1,, +,, ' ! $. ,,. 7# 892:. @. , ,. ,. +,. 1,. 2,. ) /) #. +5. -,. 9,. 5,. =,. 8,.
(28) =,, αE,2 αE,-. 9,, 2,,. α E , 5αE. ,. +,, αE. ,,,. +αE. =,,. 5-. 9,, 2,, +,, , ,. ,. +,. 1,. ) 0) 3. B. +. ,= ,9 ,2 $ &. ,+ , ,. ,+. ,2. ,9. ) 1) A. +=. ,=. +.
(29) ,,, =,, 9,, 2,, +,, , ,. ,+. ,2. ,9. ,=. +. 2. 9. β. ) 2) '. 9 2 +. ,= ,9 $. ,2. &. ,+ , ,. ,+. ,2. ,9. ,=. + β. ) *3) &. +8. 2.
(30) 4. *) A. A %. & ?. 7A& :. ( ?. K. & ( ;. 2 ,. 7A& :. +,- × , 1 ,1 , ++-,. 7A& :. ( K. & ( #. 7A& :. ν ε. K. ?. ?. N +9-. 7A& :. 1-,. 7A& :. +,, × , 1. ν ε. K. ,1 , +D. #. 7A& :. 1 --1. 7A& : ?. K. & ( %. 7A& :. ν. K. ε. % ) ?. 7. : 7A& :. ( ? &. K. ν ε. K. (. ) *). ) +) %. ) ,) %. ) -) %. 1,. 2+ -. 1+8+, , , ,,2, + 21-. 7A& :. -9-. 7A& :. +,, × , 1 ,1 , +-.
(31) ) .) #. ) /) #. ) 0) 3. B. ) 1) A. )2) '. )*3) &. 4. *) A. 1.
(32)
Related documents
Contrary to expectations, the decline in the intervention price of dairy products as a result of the 2003 MTR reform does not induce a parallel decline in marginal costs of milk
Sole Survivors: The GM can even set things up so that the PCs can’t turn – whether by making them immune as a campaign premise (see Heroes, Resistance, and Immunity, p. 30),
In the North Denmark region general practice, a complex strategy for new low back pain guideline implementation will be tested to study behaviour change (professional practice)
The principal sources of uncertainty in the determination of ambient H 2 O mixing ratios in the NOAA Water instrument are (1) the accuracy of the MBW reference frost point hy-
This study provides genomic evidence that the pmoCAB coding sequences of type Ia methanotrophs possess a unique adaptive trait manifesting as a strong nucleotide bias (Fig. 1)
In sum, we find that growth stocks outperform value stocks on days following increases in the VKOSPI, and that a potential trading rule developed on book-to-market ratios
In this section, we regress the percentage differences between implied and observed underlying prices on several measures of market friction for KOSPI 200 options, including
We found that in many lines carrying pairs of closely linked transpo- sons, chromosome breaks resulting in the loss of the distal marker C occurred during the
