• No results found

Age related changes in interlimb coordination

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Age related changes in interlimb coordination"

Copied!
103
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

2.1 Number of Discarded Trials (Ratio)

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA

Coding

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Task: 1= single task, 2= dual task

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Frequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (% discarded in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

2.053591 1 2.053591 25.88146 0.000018

0.106206 1 0.106206 1.33852 0.256425 2.380381 30 0.079346

0.000020 1 0.000020 0.00115 0.973200 0.019153 1 0.019153 1.10282 0.302034 0.521006 30 0.017367

0.179867 1 0.179867 5.41695 0.026878

0.047852 1 0.047852 1.44112 0.239352 0.996134 30 0.033204

0.466538 1 0.466538 14.30693 0.000692

0.000977 1 0.000977 0.02995 0.863772 0.978276 30 0.032609

0.019153 1 0.019153 1.37456 0.250256 0.000977 1 0.000977 0.07009 0.793021 0.418009 30 0.013934

0.000020 1 0.000020 0.00198 0.964801 0.000977 1 0.000977 0.09703 0.757578 0.301937 30 0.010065

0.060288 1 0.060288 2.27615 0.141838 0.106206 1 0.106206 4.00978 0.054348 0.794603 30 0.026487

0.004484 1 0.004484 0.18432 0.670758 0.012456 1 0.012456 0.51199 0.479812 0.729871 30 0.024329

(2)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (% discarded in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p

-i -d f -d f -d p

H-F Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr.Bn Adj. df

TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1 0.00115 0.973200#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.973200 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 1 1.10282 0.302034#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.302034 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 5.41695 0.026878#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.026878 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

1 1.44112 0.239352#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.239352 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 14.30693 0.000692#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000692 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

1 0.02995 0.863772#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.863772 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 1.37456 0.250256#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.250256 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 1 0.07009 0.793021#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.793021 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 0.00198 0.964801#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.964801 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 1 0.09703 0.757578#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.757578 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 2.27615 0.141838#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.141838 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 1 4.00978 0.054348#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.054348 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 0.18432 0.670758#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.670758 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 1 0.51199 0.479812#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.479812 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

LC; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.4170, p=.02688 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LC -0.05

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25

DV

_

1

(3)

FREQ; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=14.307, p=.00069 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

FREQ -0.05

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

DV

_

1

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (% discarded in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .03261, df = 30.000

Cell No.

FREQ {1} .04688

{2} .13225 1

2

1 0.000818

2 0.000818

group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.3385, p=.25642

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.109933 0.024898 0.059085 0.160781 16 2 0.069196 0.024898 0.018349 0.120044 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00115, p=.97320

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.089844 0.019003 0.051034 0.128654 32 2 0.089286 0.019861 0.048725 0.129847 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.1028, p=.30203

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

(4)

LC; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.4170, p=.02688

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.116071 0.020209 0.074800 0.157343 32 2 0.063058 0.021700 0.018740 0.107376 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.4411, p=.23935

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.122768 0.028580 0.064401 0.181135 16 1 2 0.097098 0.030689 0.034423 0.159773 16 2 1 0.109375 0.028580 0.051008 0.167742 16 2 2 0.029018 0.030689 -0.033657 0.091693 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=14.307, p=.00069

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.046875 0.013387 0.019536 0.074214 32 2 0.132254 0.026371 0.078397 0.186112 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.02995, p=.86377

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.069196 0.018932 0.030533 0.107860 16 1 2 0.150670 0.037295 0.074504 0.226836 16 2 1 0.024554 0.018932 -0.014110 0.063217 16 2 2 0.113839 0.037295 0.037673 0.190005 16

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.3746, p=.25026

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

(5)

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.07009, p=.79302

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.125000 0.036084 0.051306 0.198694 16 1 1 2 0.078125 0.030592 0.015648 0.140602 16 1 2 1 0.120536 0.030388 0.058476 0.182596 16 1 2 2 0.116071 0.036524 0.041480 0.190663 16 2 1 1 0.125000 0.036084 0.051306 0.198694 16 2 1 2 0.031250 0.030592 -0.031227 0.093727 16 2 2 1 0.093750 0.030388 0.031690 0.155810 16 2 2 2 0.026786 0.036524 -0.047805 0.101377 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00198, p=.96480

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.046875 0.017585 0.010961 0.082789 32 1 2 0.132813 0.030123 0.071293 0.194332 32 2 1 0.046875 0.014569 0.017121 0.076629 32 2 2 0.131696 0.027368 0.075803 0.187590 32

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09703, p=.75758

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.062500 0.024869 0.011710 0.113290 16 1 1 2 0.140625 0.042600 0.053624 0.227626 16 1 2 1 0.075893 0.020604 0.033815 0.117971 16 1 2 2 0.160714 0.038705 0.081669 0.239760 16 2 1 1 0.031250 0.024869 -0.019540 0.082040 16 2 1 2 0.125000 0.042600 0.037999 0.212001 16 2 2 1 0.017857 0.020604 -0.024221 0.059935 16 2 2 2 0.102679 0.038705 0.023633 0.181724 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.2761, p=.14184

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

(6)

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=4.0098, p=.05435

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.087054 0.022254 0.041604 0.132503 16 1 1 2 0.158482 0.047732 0.061001 0.255963 16 1 2 1 0.051339 0.022814 0.004746 0.097933 16 1 2 2 0.142857 0.045496 0.049942 0.235772 16 2 1 1 0.029018 0.022254 -0.016432 0.074467 16 2 1 2 0.189732 0.047732 0.092251 0.287213 16 2 2 1 0.020089 0.022814 -0.026504 0.066683 16 2 2 2 0.037946 0.045496 -0.054969 0.130862 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.18432, p=.67076

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.062500 0.029646 0.001954 0.123046 32 1 1 2 0.187500 0.043824 0.097999 0.277001 32 1 2 1 0.031250 0.022097 -0.013878 0.076378 32 1 2 2 0.078125 0.032022 0.012728 0.143522 32 2 1 1 0.053571 0.019764 0.013207 0.093935 32 2 1 2 0.160714 0.030410 0.098610 0.222819 32 2 2 1 0.040179 0.022082 -0.004919 0.085276 32 2 2 2 0.102679 0.036066 0.029022 0.176335 32

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.51199, p=.47981

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 0.093750 0.041926 0.008125 0.179375 16 1 1 1 2 0.156250 0.061977 0.029676 0.282824 16 1 1 2 1 0.031250 0.031250 -0.032571 0.095071 16 1 1 2 2 0.125000 0.045286 0.032515 0.217485 16 1 2 1 1 0.080357 0.027951 0.023274 0.137440 16 1 2 1 2 0.160714 0.043006 0.072885 0.248544 16 1 2 2 1 0.071429 0.031229 0.007651 0.135206 16 1 2 2 2 0.160714 0.051005 0.056548 0.264880 16 2 1 1 1 0.031250 0.041926 -0.054375 0.116875 16 2 1 1 2 0.218750 0.061977 0.092176 0.345324 16 2 1 2 1 0.031250 0.031250 -0.032571 0.095071 16 2 1 2 2 0.031250 0.045286 -0.061235 0.123735 16 2 2 1 1 0.026786 0.027951 -0.030298 0.083869 16 2 2 1 2 0.160714 0.043006 0.072885 0.248544 16 2 2 2 1 0.008929 0.031229 -0.054849 0.072706 16 2 2 2 2 0.044643 0.051005 -0.059523 0.148809 16

2.2 Movement Frequency

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA

Caption

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

(7)

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (frequency in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group

771.9384 1 771.9384 2164.329 0.000000 8.2763 1 8.2763 23.205 0.000039

10.6999 30 0.3567

0.0008 1 0.0008 0.842 0.366122

0.0080 1 0.0080 8.444 0.006819

0.0283 30 0.0009

0.0652 1 0.0652 2.176 0.150570

0.1378 1 0.1378 4.599 0.040212

0.8989 30 0.0300

0.1887 1 0.1887 6.217 0.018394 0.1518 1 0.1518 5.002 0.032897

0.9106 30 0.0304

7.8547 1 7.8547 36.223 0.000001 1.6942 1 1.6942 7.813 0.008959

6.5053 30 0.2168

0.0000 1 0.0000 0.007 0.932782 0.0029 1 0.0029 3.308 0.078938 0.0267 30 0.0009

0.0004 1 0.0004 1.255 0.271531 0.0001 1 0.0001 0.234 0.631921 0.0099 30 0.0003

0.0000 1 0.0000 0.003 0.956681 0.0149 1 0.0149 3.223 0.082692 0.1385 30 0.0046

0.0000 1 0.0000 0.050 0.825263

0.0045 1 0.0045 8.649 0.006249

0.0157 30 0.0005

0.0039 1 0.0039 0.507 0.481995

0.0773 1 0.0773 10.009 0.003556

0.2317 30 0.0077

0.0021 1 0.0021 0.190 0.666151 0.0238 1 0.0238 2.113 0.156426 0.3374 30 0.0112

0.0010 1 0.0010 3.288 0.079800 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.093 0.762166 0.0092 30 0.0003

0.0003 1 0.0003 0.402 0.530930 0.0019 1 0.0019 2.678 0.112175 0.0215 30 0.0007

0.0000 1 0.0000 0.038 0.846718 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.141 0.710289 0.0070 30 0.0002

0.0071 1 0.0071 0.845 0.365272 0.0060 1 0.0060 0.717 0.403892 0.2516 30 0.0084

(8)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p

-i -d f -d f -d p

H-F Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Low Ad

LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1 0.84208 0.366122#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.366122 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 8.44424 0.006819#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.006819 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 2.17630 0.150570#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.150570 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 4.59897 0.040212#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.040212 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 6.21719 0.018394#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.018394 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 5.00242 0.032897#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.032897 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 36.22252 0.000001#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000001 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 7.81279 0.008959#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.008959 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 0.00723 0.932782#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.932782 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 3.30804 0.078938#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.078938 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 1.25477 0.271531#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.271531 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.23423 0.631921#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.631921 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.00300 0.956681#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.956681 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 3.22299 0.082692#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.082692 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.04960 0.825263#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.825263 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 8.64922 0.006249#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.006249 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 0.50688 0.481995#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.481995 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 10.00896 0.003556#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.003556 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 0.18986 0.666151#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.666151 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 2.11309 0.156426#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.156426 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 3.28810 0.079800#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.079800 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.09327 0.762166#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.762166 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.40187 0.530930#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.530930 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 2.67829 0.112175#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.112175 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.03802 0.846718#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.846718 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.14063 0.710289#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.710289 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.84511 0.365272#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.365272 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.71682 0.403892#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.403892 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 3.20807 0.083371#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.083371 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 3.49157 0.071475#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.071475 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

(9)

LIMB*group; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=8.4442, p=.00682 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2

1 2

LIMB 0.8

0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

DV

_

1

T ASK*gro up; LS Me an s

Current effect: F(1, 30)=4.5990, p=.04021 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2

1 2

TASK 0.7

0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

DV

_

1

(10)

LC; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=6.2172, p=.01839 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LC 1.0

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

DV

_

1

LC*group; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.0024, p=.03290 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2

1 2

LC 0.7

0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

DV

_

1

(11)

FREQ; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=36.223, p=.00000 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

FREQ 0.8

0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

DV

_

1

FREQ*group; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=7.8128, p=.00896 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2

1 2

FREQ 0.6

0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

DV

_

1

(12)

LIMB*FREQ*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 30)=8.6492, p=.00625

Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2 LIMB: 1

FREQ: 1 2

0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9

DV

_

1

LIMB: 2

FREQ: 1 2

T ASK*F REQ*grou p; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.009, p=.00356

Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2 TASK: 1

FREQ: 1 2

0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0

DV

_

1

TASK: 2

FREQ: 1 2

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02235, df = 30.158

Cell No.

group LIMB {1} 1.1059

{2} 1.0956

{3} 1.3523

{4} 1.3577 1

2 3

1 1 0.051869 0.012712 0.000384

1 2 0.051869 0.000329 0.007510

(13)

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02416, df = 35.005

Cell No.

group TASK {1} 1.1059

{2} 1.0956

{3} 1.3273

{4} 1.3827 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.964445 0.028438 0.000233

1 2 0.964445 0.001044 0.003208

2 1 0.028438 0.001044 0.070924 2 2 0.000233 0.003208 0.070924

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02419, df = 35.069

Cell No.

group LC {1} 1.0988

{2} 1.1027

{3} 1.3186

{4} 1.3914 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.997891 0.029927 0.000186

1 2 0.997891 0.002201 0.003030

2 1 0.029927 0.002201 0.011401

2 2 0.000186 0.003030 0.011401

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .03584, df = 56.634

Cell No.

group FREQ {1} 1.0344

{2} 1.1671

{3} 1.1736

{4} 1.5364 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.125748 0.264288 0.000158

1 2 0.125748 0.999700 0.000292

2 1 0.264288 0.999700 0.000162

2 2 0.000158 0.000292 0.000162

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .04465, df = 30.088

Cell No.

group LIMB FREQ {1} 1.0364

{2} 1.1755

{3} 1.0324

{4} 1.1587

{5} 1.1737

{6} 1.5310

{7} 1.1736

{8} 1.5418 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.000141 0.972993 0.000141 0.891634 0.000145 0.601787 0.000143

1 1 2 0.000141 0.000141 0.005517 1.000000 0.038520 1.000000 0.000815

1 2 1 0.972993 0.000141 0.000141 0.567086 0.000144 0.877182 0.000143

1 2 2 0.000141 0.005517 0.000141 0.999999 0.000681 0.999999 0.020550

2 1 1 0.891634 1.000000 0.567086 0.999999 0.000141 1.000000 0.000141

2 1 2 0.000145 0.038520 0.000144 0.000681 0.000141 0.000141 0.163424 2 2 1 0.601787 1.000000 0.877182 0.999999 1.000000 0.000141 0.000141

2 2 2 0.000143 0.000815 0.000143 0.020550 0.000141 0.163424 0.000141

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .04555, df = 31.299

Cell No.

group TASK FREQ {1} 1.0300

{2} 1.1817

{3} 1.0388

{4} 1.1524

{5} 1.1610

{6} 1.4937

{7} 1.1863

{8} 1.5791 1

2 3 4 5

1 1 1 0.000141 0.999087 0.000141 0.912792 0.000152 0.454172 0.000139

1 1 2 0.000141 0.000141 0.570924 0.999993 0.096667 1.000000 0.000355

1 2 1 0.999087 0.000141 0.000142 0.735532 0.000159 0.851628 0.000139

1 2 2 0.000141 0.570924 0.000142 1.000000 0.001984 0.999805 0.007292

2 1 1 0.912792 0.999993 0.735532 1.000000 0.000141 0.730853 0.000141

(14)

group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=23.205, p=.00004

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.100741 0.037326 1.024512 1.176971 16 2 1.355021 0.037326 1.278792 1.431251 16

LIMB; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.84208, p=.36612 Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.229126 0.026157 1.175706 1.282545 32 2 1.226636 0.026697 1.172114 1.281159 32

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=8.4442, p=.00682

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.105927 0.036991 1.030381 1.181474 16 1 2 1.095555 0.037755 1.018449 1.172661 16 2 1 1.352324 0.036991 1.276778 1.427871 16 2 2 1.357718 0.037755 1.280612 1.434824 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.1763, p=.15057

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.216596 0.026567 1.162338 1.270853 32 2 1.239167 0.028363 1.181242 1.297092 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=4.5990, p=.04021

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.105861 0.037572 1.029130 1.182593 16 1 2 1.095621 0.040111 1.013703 1.177539 16 2 1 1.327330 0.037572 1.250598 1.404061 16 2 2 1.382713 0.040111 1.300795 1.464631 16

LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=6.2172, p=.01839 Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.208683 0.026902 1.153741 1.263625 32 2 1.247079 0.028072 1.189748 1.304411 32

(15)

LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.0024, p=.03290

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.098764 0.038045 1.021064 1.176463 16 1 2 1.102719 0.039700 1.021640 1.183797 16 2 1 1.318602 0.038045 1.240903 1.396301 16 2 2 1.391440 0.039700 1.310361 1.472519 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=36.223, p=.00000

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.104022 0.030921 1.040873 1.167171 32 2 1.351741 0.035835 1.278555 1.424926 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=7.8128, p=.00896

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.034405 0.043729 0.945099 1.123711 16 1 2 1.167077 0.050679 1.063578 1.270577 16 2 1 1.173639 0.043729 1.084333 1.262945 16 2 2 1.536404 0.050679 1.432904 1.639904 16

LIMB*TASK; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00723, p=.93278

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.217728 0.026634 1.163335 1.272121 32 1 2 1.240523 0.028244 1.182842 1.298205 32 2 1 1.215463 0.026732 1.160868 1.270058 32 2 2 1.237810 0.028516 1.179573 1.296047 32

LIMB*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.3080, p=.07894

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

(16)

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.2548, p=.27153

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.209027 0.026731 1.154435 1.263619 32 1 2 1.249224 0.027658 1.192740 1.305709 32 2 1 1.208339 0.027146 1.152900 1.263777 32 2 2 1.244934 0.028585 1.186555 1.303313 32

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.23423, p=.63192

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.102660 0.037803 1.025456 1.179865 16 1 1 2 1.109194 0.039114 1.029312 1.189076 16 1 2 1 1.094867 0.038390 1.016465 1.173269 16 1 2 2 1.096243 0.040426 1.013683 1.178803 16 2 1 1 1.315394 0.037803 1.238189 1.392599 16 2 1 2 1.389255 0.039114 1.309373 1.469136 16 2 2 1 1.321810 0.038390 1.243408 1.400212 16 2 2 2 1.393626 0.040426 1.311065 1.476186 16

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00300, p=.95668

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.197233 0.028953 1.138103 1.256362 32 1 2 1.235958 0.027171 1.180467 1.291449 32 2 1 1.220133 0.027368 1.164240 1.276026 32 2 2 1.258200 0.031116 1.194654 1.321747 32

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.2230, p=.08269

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.109111 0.040946 1.025489 1.192733 16 1 1 2 1.102612 0.038426 1.024136 1.181088 16 1 2 1 1.088417 0.038704 1.009372 1.167462 16 1 2 2 1.102825 0.044004 1.012957 1.192694 16 2 1 1 1.285355 0.040946 1.201733 1.368977 16 2 1 2 1.369305 0.038426 1.290829 1.447781 16 2 2 1 1.351850 0.038704 1.272805 1.430895 16 2 2 2 1.413576 0.044004 1.323707 1.503444 16

LIMB*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.04960, p=.82526

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

(17)

LIMB*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=8.6492, p=.00625

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.036397 0.043750 0.947047 1.125747 16 1 1 2 1.175457 0.050194 1.072947 1.277968 16 1 2 1 1.032413 0.043736 0.943092 1.121734 16 1 2 2 1.158697 0.051357 1.053812 1.263583 16 2 1 1 1.173686 0.043750 1.084336 1.263036 16 2 1 2 1.530963 0.050194 1.428453 1.633473 16 2 2 1 1.173591 0.043736 1.084270 1.262912 16 2 2 2 1.541845 0.051357 1.436959 1.646730 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.50688, p=.48199

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.095501 0.032449 1.029232 1.161771 32 1 2 1.337690 0.034467 1.267299 1.408080 32 2 1 1.112542 0.030530 1.050193 1.174892 32 2 2 1.365791 0.040025 1.284049 1.447534 32

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.009, p=.00356

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.030003 0.045890 0.936284 1.123722 16 1 1 2 1.181720 0.048743 1.082172 1.281267 16 1 2 1 1.038807 0.043175 0.950631 1.126982 16 1 2 2 1.152435 0.056604 1.036834 1.268037 16 2 1 1 1.160999 0.045890 1.067280 1.254718 16 2 1 2 1.493660 0.048743 1.394113 1.593208 16 2 2 1 1.186278 0.043175 1.098102 1.274454 16 2 2 2 1.579147 0.056604 1.463546 1.694749 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.18986, p=.66615

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

(18)

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.1131, p=.15643

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.027656 0.042248 0.941374 1.113939 16 1 1 2 1.169871 0.048926 1.069950 1.269792 16 1 2 1 1.041153 0.048052 0.943019 1.139288 16 1 2 2 1.164284 0.055887 1.050146 1.278421 16 2 1 1 1.146075 0.042248 1.059793 1.232358 16 2 1 2 1.491129 0.048926 1.391208 1.591050 16 2 2 1 1.201202 0.048052 1.103067 1.299337 16 2 2 2 1.581678 0.055887 1.467541 1.695816 16

LIMB*TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.2881, p=.07980

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.196059 0.029035 1.136762 1.255355 32 1 1 2 1.239398 0.027020 1.184216 1.294579 32 1 2 1 1.221996 0.027282 1.166279 1.277712 32 1 2 2 1.259051 0.030960 1.195822 1.322281 32 2 1 1 1.198407 0.029086 1.139006 1.257808 32 2 1 2 1.232519 0.027698 1.175951 1.289086 32 2 2 1 1.218270 0.027523 1.162061 1.274480 32 2 2 2 1.257350 0.031296 1.193434 1.321265 32

LIMB*TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09327, p=.76217

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

(19)

LIMB*TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.40187, p=.53093

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.097159 0.032465 1.030857 1.163462 32 1 1 2 1.338297 0.034652 1.267529 1.409065 32 1 2 1 1.112924 0.030489 1.050657 1.175191 32 1 2 2 1.368123 0.040080 1.286269 1.449978 32 2 1 1 1.093843 0.032465 1.027541 1.160145 32 2 1 2 1.337083 0.034845 1.265920 1.408246 32 2 2 1 1.112161 0.030604 1.049659 1.174663 32 2 2 2 1.363459 0.040030 1.281706 1.445212 32

LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.6783, p=.11217

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 1.033092 0.045912 0.939326 1.126858 16 1 1 1 2 1.193570 0.049005 1.093489 1.293652 16 1 1 2 1 1.039702 0.043118 0.951643 1.127761 16 1 1 2 2 1.157345 0.056682 1.041585 1.273104 16 1 2 1 1 1.026914 0.045912 0.933149 1.120679 16 1 2 1 2 1.169869 0.049278 1.069229 1.270508 16 1 2 2 1 1.037912 0.043281 0.949520 1.126303 16 1 2 2 2 1.147526 0.056612 1.031910 1.263142 16 2 1 1 1 1.161227 0.045912 1.067461 1.254992 16 2 1 1 2 1.483023 0.049005 1.382942 1.583105 16 2 1 2 1 1.186146 0.043118 1.098087 1.274204 16 2 1 2 2 1.578902 0.056682 1.463142 1.694662 16 2 2 1 1 1.160772 0.045912 1.067007 1.254537 16 2 2 1 2 1.504297 0.049278 1.403658 1.604936 16 2 2 2 1 1.186410 0.043281 1.098019 1.274802 16 2 2 2 2 1.579393 0.056612 1.463776 1.695009 16

LIMB*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.03802, p=.84672

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

(20)

LIMB*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.14063, p=.71029

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 1.027975 0.042464 0.941253 1.114698 16 1 1 1 2 1.177346 0.048666 1.077957 1.276734 16 1 1 2 1 1.044819 0.047889 0.947016 1.142621 16 1 1 2 2 1.173569 0.054905 1.061439 1.285700 16 1 2 1 1 1.027338 0.042089 0.941379 1.113296 16 1 2 1 2 1.162397 0.049430 1.061447 1.263347 16 1 2 2 1 1.037488 0.048265 0.938918 1.136058 16 1 2 2 2 1.154998 0.057112 1.038360 1.271636 16 2 1 1 1 1.145733 0.042464 1.059010 1.232455 16 2 1 1 2 1.485055 0.048666 1.385667 1.584444 16 2 1 2 1 1.201640 0.047889 1.103837 1.299442 16 2 1 2 2 1.576870 0.054905 1.464739 1.689000 16 2 2 1 1 1.146418 0.042089 1.060460 1.232376 16 2 2 1 2 1.497203 0.049430 1.396253 1.598153 16 2 2 2 1 1.200764 0.048265 1.102194 1.299334 16 2 2 2 2 1.586487 0.057112 1.469849 1.703124 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.84511, p=.36527

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.074460 0.031749 1.009621 1.139299 32 1 1 2 1.320005 0.035424 1.247661 1.392350 32 1 2 1 1.116542 0.036707 1.041576 1.191508 32 1 2 2 1.355374 0.038110 1.277544 1.433204 32 2 1 1 1.099272 0.030004 1.037995 1.160548 32 2 1 2 1.340995 0.037781 1.263836 1.418153 32 2 2 1 1.125813 0.032426 1.059590 1.192036 32 2 2 2 1.390588 0.044289 1.300138 1.481038 32

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.71682, p=.40389

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

(21)

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.2081, p=.08337

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

(22)

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.4916, p=.07148

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

1 1 1 1 1 1.021531 0.044891 0.929851 1.113212 16 1 1 1 1 2 1.206712 0.050710 1.103149 1.310276 16 1 1 1 2 1 1.044653 0.051984 0.938488 1.150819 16 1 1 1 2 2 1.180428 0.053532 1.071102 1.289754 16 1 1 2 1 1 1.034419 0.042562 0.947496 1.121343 16 1 1 2 1 2 1.147979 0.053726 1.038256 1.257702 16 1 1 2 2 1 1.044984 0.045590 0.951878 1.138091 16 1 1 2 2 2 1.166711 0.062422 1.039228 1.294194 16 1 2 1 1 1 1.021138 0.044933 0.929372 1.112903 16 1 2 1 1 2 1.187063 0.050375 1.084183 1.289942 16 1 2 1 2 1 1.032691 0.051962 0.926570 1.138811 16 1 2 1 2 2 1.152675 0.055291 1.039755 1.265595 16 1 2 2 1 1 1.033538 0.042455 0.946833 1.120242 16 1 2 2 1 2 1.137731 0.053281 1.028917 1.246545 16 1 2 2 2 1 1.042285 0.046153 0.948027 1.136543 16 1 2 2 2 2 1.157321 0.062921 1.028819 1.285823 16 2 1 1 1 1 1.128112 0.044891 1.036432 1.219793 16 2 1 1 1 2 1.427878 0.050710 1.324315 1.531442 16 2 1 1 2 1 1.194341 0.051984 1.088175 1.300506 16 2 1 1 2 2 1.538169 0.053532 1.428843 1.647495 16 2 1 2 1 1 1.163353 0.042562 1.076429 1.250277 16 2 1 2 1 2 1.542232 0.053726 1.432509 1.651955 16 2 1 2 2 1 1.208938 0.045590 1.115832 1.302045 16 2 1 2 2 2 1.615571 0.062422 1.488088 1.743054 16 2 2 1 1 1 1.127059 0.044933 1.035294 1.218825 16 2 2 1 1 2 1.458369 0.050375 1.355490 1.561248 16 2 2 1 2 1 1.194484 0.051962 1.088364 1.300605 16 2 2 1 2 2 1.550225 0.055291 1.437305 1.663145 16 2 2 2 1 1 1.165777 0.042455 1.079072 1.252481 16 2 2 2 1 2 1.536036 0.053281 1.427223 1.644850 16 2 2 2 2 1 1.207044 0.046153 1.112786 1.301302 16 2 2 2 2 2 1.622749 0.062921 1.494247 1.751250 16

2.3 Coefficient of Variation for Movement Frequency

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA

Caption

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Task: 1= single task, 2= dual task

Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Frequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible

(23)

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1.786376 1 1.786376 472.4344 0.000000

0.006094 1 0.006094 1.6116 0.214024 0.113436 30 0.003781

0.076636 1 0.076636 49.9127 0.000000

0.001795 1 0.001795 1.1691 0.288211 0.046062 30 0.001535

0.000122 1 0.000122 0.1177 0.733972 0.002328 1 0.002328 2.2530 0.143806 0.030992 30 0.001033

0.007660 1 0.007660 10.8953 0.002494

0.000470 1 0.000470 0.6680 0.420182 0.021090 30 0.000703

0.026723 1 0.026723 23.5160 0.000036

0.001197 1 0.001197 1.0535 0.312909 0.034091 30 0.001136

0.000228 1 0.000228 0.3955 0.534187

0.003109 1 0.003109 5.3946 0.027169

0.017287 30 0.000576

0.000390 1 0.000390 0.5680 0.456933

0.003561 1 0.003561 5.1811 0.030138

0.020617 30 0.000687

0.000239 1 0.000239 0.3698 0.547671 0.000296 1 0.000296 0.4576 0.503940 0.019417 30 0.000647

0.001292 1 0.001292 2.8302 0.102888 0.000803 1 0.000803 1.7593 0.194724 0.013691 30 0.000456

0.004999 1 0.004999 5.0919 0.031482

0.000861 1 0.000861 0.8771 0.356479 0.029456 30 0.000982

0.000633 1 0.000633 0.8553 0.362434 0.000215 1 0.000215 0.2901 0.594162 0.022207 30 0.000740

0.000023 1 0.000023 0.0931 0.762440 0.000014 1 0.000014 0.0570 0.812847 0.007472 30 0.000249

0.000352 1 0.000352 0.9702 0.332514 0.000221 1 0.000221 0.6087 0.441402 0.010879 30 0.000363

0.000246 1 0.000246 0.7416 0.395979 0.000140 1 0.000140 0.4230 0.520403 0.009937 30 0.000331

0.000043 1 0.000043 0.1305 0.720476 0.000348 1 0.000348 1.0532 0.312983 0.009903 30 0.000330

0.000105 1 0.000105 0.1876 0.668034 0.000056 1 0.000056 0.1000 0.754049 0.016755 30 0.000559

(24)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p

-i -d f -d f -d p

H-F Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr Adj

LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1 49.91268 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 1.16905 0.288211 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.288211 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.11767 0.733972 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.733972 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 2.25303 0.143806 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.143806 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 10.89525 0.002494 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.002494 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 0.66803 0.420182 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.420182 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 23.51601 0.000036 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000036 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 1.05349 0.312909 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.312909 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.39549 0.534187 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.534187 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 5.39460 0.027169 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.027169 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 0.56799 0.456933 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.456933 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 5.18106 0.030138 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.030138 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 0.36984 0.547671 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.547671 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.45758 0.503940 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.503940 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 2.83020 0.102888 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.102888 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 1.75928 0.194724 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.194724 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 5.09190 0.031482 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.031482 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 0.87709 0.356479 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.356479 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.85531 0.362434 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.362434 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.29005 0.594162 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.594162 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.09305 0.762440 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.762440 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.05705 0.812847 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.812847 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.97017 0.332514 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.332514 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.60867 0.441402 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.441402 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.74160 0.395979 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.395979 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.42298 0.520403 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.520403 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.13047 0.720476 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.720476 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 1.05317 0.312983 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.312983 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.18758 0.668034 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.668034 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.09998 0.754049 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.754049 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

(25)

LIMB; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=49.913, p=.00000 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LIMB 0.02

0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10

DV

_

1

LC; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.895, p=.00249 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LC 0.03

0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09

DV

_

1

(26)

FREQ; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=23.516, p=.00004 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

FREQ 0.03

0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10

DV

_

1

LIMB*T ASK*g roup ; LS Mean s Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.3946, p=.02717

Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertica l bars d enote 0.95 co nfid ence in te rvals

group 1 group

2 LIMB: 1

TASK: 1 2

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12

DV

_

1

LIMB: 2

TASK: 1 2

(27)

LIMB*LC*group; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.1811, p=.03014 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2 LIMB: 1

LC: 1 2

0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11

DV

_

1

LIMB: 2

LC: 1 2

TASK*FREQ; L S Mea ns

Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.0919, p=.03148 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

TASK 1 TASK

2

1 2

FREQ 0.03

0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10

DV

_

1

(28)

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .00054, df = 38.936

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK {1} .06120

{2} .07076

{3} .04674

{4} .04377

{5} .08104

{6} .07221

{7} .04923

{8} .04759 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.352064 0.035025 0.006143 0.609142 0.880270 0.827807 0.717790 1 1 2 0.352064 0.000215 0.000150 0.912455 1.000000 0.183825 0.122539 1 2 1 0.035025 0.000215 0.996389 0.003968 0.065787 0.999998 1.000000 1 2 2 0.006143 0.000150 0.996389 0.001458 0.027210 0.997578 0.999962 2 1 1 0.609142 0.912455 0.003968 0.001458 0.448764 0.000141 0.000141

2 1 2 0.880270 1.000000 0.065787 0.027210 0.448764 0.000295 0.000189

2 2 1 0.827807 0.183825 0.999998 0.997578 0.000141 0.000295 0.999926 2 2 2 0.717790 0.122539 1.000000 0.999962 0.000141 0.000189 0.999926

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .00056, df = 40.556

Cell No.

group LIMB LC {1} .07065

{2} .06131

{3} .04640

{4} .04411

{5} .07794

{6} .07531

{7} .05675

{8} .04008 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.487886 0.000408 0.000201 0.997261 0.999234 0.709164 0.015144

1 1 2 0.487886 0.054569 0.016815 0.500404 0.896185 0.999331 0.208020 1 2 1 0.000408 0.054569 0.999623 0.011089 0.025713 0.977855 0.994433 1 2 2 0.000201 0.016815 0.999623 0.005152 0.012387 0.796429 0.999945 2 1 1 0.997261 0.500404 0.011089 0.005152 0.999077 0.001868 0.000141

2 1 2 0.999234 0.896185 0.025713 0.012387 0.999077 0.008000 0.000141

2 2 1 0.709164 0.999331 0.977855 0.796429 0.001868 0.008000 0.022203

2 2 2 0.015144 0.208020 0.994433 0.999945 0.000141 0.000141 0.022203

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00098, df = 30.000

Cell No.

TASK FREQ {1} .04921

{2} .06990

{3} .05448

{4} .06268 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.000207 0.541488 0.008988

1 2 0.000207 0.002527 0.273287 2 1 0.541488 0.002527 0.178479 2 2 0.008988 0.273287 0.178479

group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.6116, p=.21402

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.055618 0.003843 0.047769 0.063467 16 2 0.062518 0.003843 0.054669 0.070367 16

LIMB; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=49.913, p=.00000

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.071302 0.003531 0.064092 0.078513 32 2 0.046834 0.002881 0.040949 0.052718 32

(29)

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.1691, p=.28821

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.065980 0.004993 0.055783 0.076177 16 1 2 0.045256 0.004075 0.036934 0.053578 16 2 1 0.076625 0.004993 0.066427 0.086822 16 2 2 0.048411 0.004075 0.040089 0.056733 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.11767, p=.73397

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.059555 0.003164 0.053094 0.066016 32 2 0.058581 0.002966 0.052523 0.064638 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.2530, p=.14381

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.053973 0.004474 0.044836 0.063110 16 1 2 0.057263 0.004195 0.048696 0.065830 16 2 1 0.065137 0.004474 0.056000 0.074274 16 2 2 0.059898 0.004195 0.051332 0.068465 16

LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.895, p=.00249

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.062936 0.002702 0.057417 0.068454 32 2 0.055200 0.003196 0.048673 0.061728 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.66803, p=.42018

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.058528 0.003821 0.050724 0.066332 16 1 2 0.052708 0.004520 0.043477 0.061939 16 2 1 0.067343 0.003821 0.059539 0.075147 16 2 2 0.057692 0.004520 0.048461 0.066924 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=23.516, p=.00004

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.051843 0.002196 0.047358 0.056329 32 2 0.066292 0.003793 0.058546 0.074038 32

(30)

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.0535, p=.31291

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.049923 0.003106 0.043579 0.056266 16 1 2 0.061313 0.005364 0.050359 0.072268 16 2 1 0.053764 0.003106 0.047421 0.060107 16 2 2 0.071271 0.005364 0.060317 0.082226 16

LIMB*TASK; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.39549, p=.53419

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.071122 0.004292 0.062356 0.079888 32 1 2 0.071482 0.003755 0.063813 0.079152 32 2 1 0.047988 0.003387 0.041070 0.054906 32 2 2 0.045679 0.003179 0.039187 0.052172 32

LIMB*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.3946, p=.02717

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.061204 0.006070 0.048807 0.073601 16 1 1 2 0.070756 0.005311 0.059909 0.081603 16 1 2 1 0.046742 0.004791 0.036959 0.056526 16 1 2 2 0.043770 0.004496 0.034588 0.052951 16 2 1 1 0.081041 0.006070 0.068644 0.093438 16 2 1 2 0.072208 0.005311 0.061362 0.083055 16 2 2 1 0.049234 0.004791 0.039450 0.059017 16 2 2 2 0.047589 0.004496 0.038407 0.056770 16

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.56799, p=.45693

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.074297 0.003992 0.066144 0.082450 32 1 2 0.068308 0.003662 0.060828 0.075787 32 2 1 0.051575 0.002757 0.045945 0.057204 32 2 2 0.042093 0.003930 0.034066 0.050119 32

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.1811, p=.03014

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5

(31)

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.36984, p=.54767

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.062739 0.003258 0.056085 0.069394 32 1 2 0.056371 0.004226 0.047740 0.065003 32 2 1 0.063132 0.003491 0.056003 0.070261 32 2 2 0.054029 0.002738 0.048438 0.059621 32

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.45758, p=.50394

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.056960 0.004608 0.047549 0.066371 16 1 1 2 0.050986 0.005977 0.038779 0.063193 16 1 2 1 0.060096 0.004937 0.050014 0.070178 16 1 2 2 0.054430 0.003872 0.046522 0.062337 16 2 1 1 0.068518 0.004608 0.059108 0.077929 16 2 1 2 0.061756 0.005977 0.049549 0.073963 16 2 2 1 0.066168 0.004937 0.056086 0.076250 16 2 2 2 0.053629 0.003872 0.045721 0.061536 16

LIMB*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.8302, p=.10289

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.062489 0.002670 0.057036 0.067943 32 1 2 0.080115 0.005123 0.069652 0.090578 32 2 1 0.041197 0.002800 0.035479 0.046916 32 2 2 0.052470 0.003572 0.045175 0.059765 32

LIMB*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.7593, p=.19472

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.059949 0.003776 0.052236 0.067661 16 1 1 2 0.072011 0.007246 0.057214 0.086809 16 1 2 1 0.039897 0.003960 0.031809 0.047984 16 1 2 2 0.050615 0.005052 0.040299 0.060932 16 2 1 1 0.065030 0.003776 0.057318 0.072743 16 2 1 2 0.088219 0.007246 0.073421 0.103016 16 2 2 1 0.042498 0.003960 0.034411 0.050585 16 2 2 2 0.054324 0.005052 0.044007 0.064641 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.0919, p=.03148

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

(32)

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.87709, p=.35648

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.046450 0.003074 0.040171 0.052729 16 1 1 2 0.061496 0.007334 0.046518 0.076474 16 1 2 1 0.053395 0.004356 0.044500 0.062291 16 1 2 2 0.061130 0.005110 0.050695 0.071566 16 2 1 1 0.051962 0.003074 0.045683 0.058241 16 2 1 2 0.078313 0.007334 0.063335 0.093291 16 2 2 1 0.055567 0.004356 0.046671 0.064462 16 2 2 2 0.064230 0.005110 0.053795 0.074666 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.85531, p=.36243

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.054599 0.002370 0.049759 0.059440 32 1 2 0.071272 0.004128 0.062843 0.079702 32 2 1 0.049088 0.002912 0.043141 0.055034 32 2 2 0.061313 0.004308 0.052514 0.070111 32

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.29005, p=.59416

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.051073 0.003352 0.044228 0.057918 16 1 1 2 0.065983 0.005837 0.054062 0.077904 16 1 2 1 0.048772 0.004118 0.040362 0.057182 16 1 2 2 0.056644 0.006093 0.044200 0.069087 16 2 1 1 0.058125 0.003352 0.051280 0.064971 16 2 1 2 0.076561 0.005837 0.064640 0.088483 16 2 2 1 0.049403 0.004118 0.040993 0.057813 16 2 2 2 0.065981 0.006093 0.053538 0.078425 16

LIMB*TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09305, p=.76244

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

(33)

LIMB*TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.05705, p=.81285

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 0.065908 0.007670 0.050245 0.081572 16 1 1 1 2 0.056499 0.006532 0.043159 0.069839 16 1 1 2 1 0.075399 0.005983 0.063181 0.087618 16 1 1 2 2 0.066113 0.005001 0.055900 0.076325 16 1 2 1 1 0.048011 0.004254 0.039324 0.056699 16 1 2 1 2 0.045473 0.007453 0.030253 0.060693 16 1 2 2 1 0.044793 0.005846 0.032853 0.056732 16 1 2 2 2 0.042746 0.004217 0.034135 0.051358 16 2 1 1 1 0.080532 0.007670 0.064869 0.096196 16 2 1 1 2 0.081549 0.006532 0.068209 0.094889 16 2 1 2 1 0.075347 0.005983 0.063129 0.087566 16 2 1 2 2 0.069069 0.005001 0.058857 0.079282 16 2 2 1 1 0.056504 0.004254 0.047817 0.065192 16 2 2 1 2 0.041963 0.007453 0.026743 0.057183 16 2 2 2 1 0.056989 0.005846 0.045050 0.068929 16 2 2 2 2 0.038188 0.004217 0.029576 0.046800 16

LIMB*TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.97017, p=.33251

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.058356 0.002928 0.052376 0.064335 32 1 1 2 0.083889 0.007344 0.068890 0.098888 32 1 2 1 0.066623 0.003168 0.060154 0.073092 32 1 2 2 0.076341 0.004904 0.066326 0.086356 32 2 1 1 0.040056 0.002632 0.034681 0.045430 32 2 1 2 0.055920 0.004853 0.046009 0.065831 32 2 2 1 0.042339 0.003971 0.034229 0.050449 32 2 2 2 0.049019 0.003358 0.042162 0.055876 32

LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.60867, p=.44140

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

(34)

LIMB*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.74160, p=.39598

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.065065 0.003161 0.058608 0.071521 32 1 1 2 0.083529 0.006302 0.070659 0.096399 32 1 2 1 0.059914 0.003003 0.053781 0.066047 32 1 2 2 0.076701 0.005155 0.066174 0.087228 32 2 1 1 0.044134 0.003182 0.037635 0.050632 32 2 1 2 0.059015 0.003563 0.051738 0.066292 32 2 2 1 0.038261 0.003821 0.030458 0.046065 32 2 2 2 0.045924 0.004869 0.035981 0.055868 32

LIMB*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.42298, p=.52040

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 0.063032 0.004471 0.053902 0.072163 16 1 1 1 2 0.078275 0.008912 0.060074 0.096477 16 1 1 2 1 0.056865 0.004247 0.048191 0.065538 16 1 1 2 2 0.065747 0.007290 0.050860 0.080635 16 1 2 1 1 0.039114 0.004500 0.029923 0.048304 16 1 2 1 2 0.053691 0.005039 0.043399 0.063982 16 1 2 2 1 0.040680 0.005404 0.029644 0.051715 16 1 2 2 2 0.047540 0.006886 0.033478 0.061602 16 2 1 1 1 0.067097 0.004471 0.057966 0.076228 16 2 1 1 2 0.088783 0.008912 0.070582 0.106984 16 2 1 2 1 0.062964 0.004247 0.054291 0.071637 16 2 1 2 2 0.087655 0.007290 0.072767 0.102542 16 2 2 1 1 0.049154 0.004500 0.039963 0.058344 16 2 2 1 2 0.064340 0.005039 0.054049 0.074631 16 2 2 2 1 0.035843 0.005404 0.024807 0.046878 16 2 2 2 2 0.044308 0.006886 0.030246 0.058370 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.13047, p=.72048

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

(35)

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.0532, p=.31298

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 0.046563 0.003589 0.039233 0.053893 16 1 1 1 2 0.067357 0.008340 0.050323 0.084390 16 1 1 2 1 0.046337 0.005318 0.035477 0.057196 16 1 1 2 2 0.055636 0.008760 0.037745 0.073527 16 1 2 1 1 0.055583 0.005509 0.044331 0.066835 16 1 2 1 2 0.064609 0.005909 0.052541 0.076677 16 1 2 2 1 0.051208 0.004000 0.043038 0.059377 16 1 2 2 2 0.057651 0.004852 0.047741 0.067561 16 2 1 1 1 0.055413 0.003589 0.048083 0.062742 16 2 1 1 2 0.081624 0.008340 0.064591 0.098658 16 2 1 2 1 0.048511 0.005318 0.037651 0.059371 16 2 1 2 2 0.075001 0.008760 0.057110 0.092891 16 2 2 1 1 0.060838 0.005509 0.049586 0.072090 16 2 2 1 2 0.071499 0.005909 0.059430 0.083567 16 2 2 2 1 0.050295 0.004000 0.042126 0.058465 16 2 2 2 2 0.056962 0.004852 0.047052 0.066872 16

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.18758, p=.66803

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

(36)

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09998, p=.75405

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

1 1 1 1 1 0.055295 0.005350 0.044368 0.066222 16 1 1 1 1 2 0.076522 0.014012 0.047905 0.105139 16 1 1 1 2 1 0.051049 0.005574 0.039665 0.062434 16 1 1 1 2 2 0.061949 0.010422 0.040664 0.083234 16 1 1 2 1 1 0.070770 0.005406 0.059729 0.081811 16 1 1 2 1 2 0.080029 0.007881 0.063934 0.096124 16 1 1 2 2 1 0.062680 0.004362 0.053771 0.071588 16 1 1 2 2 2 0.069546 0.006710 0.055841 0.083250 16 1 2 1 1 1 0.037831 0.004097 0.029464 0.046198 16 1 2 1 1 2 0.058192 0.007344 0.043194 0.073189 16 1 2 1 2 1 0.041624 0.006851 0.027631 0.055616 16 1 2 1 2 2 0.049323 0.009875 0.029156 0.069490 16 1 2 2 1 1 0.040396 0.008187 0.023677 0.057115 16 1 2 2 1 2 0.049190 0.005769 0.037408 0.060971 16 1 2 2 2 1 0.039736 0.004840 0.029851 0.049620 16 1 2 2 2 2 0.045757 0.004787 0.035980 0.055534 16 2 1 1 1 1 0.065099 0.005350 0.054172 0.076026 16 2 1 1 1 2 0.095966 0.014012 0.067349 0.124583 16 2 1 1 2 1 0.061980 0.005574 0.050595 0.073364 16 2 1 1 2 2 0.101118 0.010422 0.079834 0.122403 16 2 1 2 1 1 0.069095 0.005406 0.058054 0.080136 16 2 1 2 1 2 0.081599 0.007881 0.065504 0.097694 16 2 1 2 2 1 0.063948 0.004362 0.055039 0.072856 16 2 1 2 2 2 0.074191 0.006710 0.060486 0.087896 16 2 2 1 1 1 0.045726 0.004097 0.037359 0.054093 16 2 2 1 1 2 0.067283 0.007344 0.052285 0.082280 16 2 2 1 2 1 0.035042 0.006851 0.021050 0.049035 16 2 2 1 2 2 0.048883 0.009875 0.028717 0.069050 16 2 2 2 1 1 0.052581 0.008187 0.035862 0.069300 16 2 2 2 1 2 0.061398 0.005769 0.049617 0.073179 16 2 2 2 2 1 0.036643 0.004840 0.026758 0.046527 16 2 2 2 2 2 0.039733 0.004787 0.029956 0.049510 16

2.4 Movement Amplitude

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA

Caption

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Task: 1= single task, 2= dual task

Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Frequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible

(37)

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (amplitude in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1398517 1 1398517 1027.382 0.000000 22931 1 22931 16.846 0.000286

40837 30 1361

101995 1 101995 105.855 0.000000

1036 1 1036 1.075 0.308161

28906 30 964

1259 1 1259 17.613 0.000222

256 1 256 3.585 0.067985

2144 30 71

1892 1 1892 13.333 0.000985 1334 1 1334 9.401 0.004560

4257 30 142

108 1 108 1.294 0.264372

56 1 56 0.673 0.418358

2495 30 83

55 1 55 2.892 0.099374

200 1 200 10.424 0.003008

574 30 19

721 1 721 3.638 0.066084

793 1 793 4.001 0.054595

5944 30 198

2 1 2 0.078 0.781714

46 1 46 1.883 0.180198

733 30 24

336 1 336 6.537 0.015866

154 1 154 2.999 0.093567

1541 30 51

56 1 56 1.752 0.195683

54 1 54 1.699 0.202368

955 30 32

3 1 3 0.180 0.674721

3 1 3 0.197 0.660535

522 30 17

0 1 0 0.022 0.882821

75 1 75 5.010 0.032778

451 30 15

63 1 63 4.079 0.052434

39 1 39 2.569 0.119470

460 30 15

7 1 7 0.614 0.439470

1 1 1 0.099 0.754880

327 30 11

10 1 10 0.767 0.388132

2 1 2 0.144 0.706990

391 30 13

4 1 4 0.330 0.569810

13 1 13 1.150 0.292046

336 30 11

(38)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (amplitude in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p

-i -d f -d f -d p

H-F Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Low Ad

LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1 105.8548 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 3

1 1.0747 0.308161 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.308161 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 17.6129 0.000222 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000222 1.000000 1.000000 3

1 3.5850 0.067985 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.067985 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 13.3329 0.000985 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000985 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 9.4015 0.004560 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.004560 1.000000 1.000000 3

30

1 1.2937 0.264372 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.264372 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 0.6734 0.418358 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.418358 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 2.8919 0.099374 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.099374 1.000000 1.000000 3

1 10.4243 0.003008 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.003008 1.000000 1.000000 3

30

1 3.6382 0.066084 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.066084 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 4.0011 0.054595 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.054595 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.0782 0.781714 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.781714 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 1.8827 0.180198 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.180198 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 6.5370 0.015866 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.015866 1.000000 1.000000 3

1 2.9994 0.093567 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.093567 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 1.7515 0.195683 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.195683 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 1.6987 0.202368 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.202368 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.1796 0.674721 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.674721 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 0.1968 0.660535 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.660535 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.0221 0.882821 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.882821 1.000000 1.000000 3

1 5.0098 0.032778 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.032778 1.000000 1.000000 3

30

1 4.0789 0.052434 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.052434 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 2.5688 0.119470 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.119470 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.6139 0.439470 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.439470 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 0.0993 0.754880 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.754880 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.7669 0.388132 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.388132 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 0.1440 0.706990 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.706990 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.3302 0.569810 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.569810 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 1.1503 0.292046 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.292046 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

(39)

group; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=16.846, p=.00029 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

group 35

40 45 50 55 60 65 70

DV

_

1

LIMB; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=105.85, p=.00000 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LIMB 20

30 40 50 60 70 80 90

DV

_

1

(40)

TASK; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=17.613, p=.00022 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

TASK 35

40 45 50 55 60 65 70

DV

_

1

LC; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=13.333, p=.00099 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LC 35

40 45 50 55 60 65 70

DV

_

1

References

Related documents

The data were collected from 218 undergraduate nursing students using demographic data, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 42).The progressive muscle

At body temperature (37 o C), the gas solubilities and diffusivities are slightly higher, and thus we expect a corresponding increase in the rate of gas exchange and oxygen

In SSA Form, the fact that the interference graph is chordal yields a stronger guarantee of k -colorability than traditional coalescing methods, because merging vertices may not

over the thermoformed sheet. To make the cut, a sheet shear has been used, according to [29]. Thermoforming of specimens for tensile tests: a) Hybrid mould; b) Thermoforming of the

LIMONE SUCCO 1987/AS ZDT-TGMS Pareve Symbol.. BB306H E.SOL.CEDRATA AURELIA 1x1250 BRL-MDCK

Eine weitere Studie konnte zeigen, dass der Defekt im PKD4-Gen in einer europäischen Kohorte von Dobermännern keine Rolle bei der Entstehung von DCM spielte und auch

We have seen in Section 2 that the current methods for constructing families of elliptic curves of prime order with prescribed embedding degree can all be subsumed under a