• No results found

Age related changes in interlimb coordination

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Age related changes in interlimb coordination"

Copied!
103
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

2.1 Number of Discarded Trials (Ratio)

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA

Coding

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Task: 1= single task, 2= dual task

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Frequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (% discarded in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

2.053591 1 2.053591 25.88146 0.000018

0.106206 1 0.106206 1.33852 0.256425 2.380381 30 0.079346

0.000020 1 0.000020 0.00115 0.973200 0.019153 1 0.019153 1.10282 0.302034 0.521006 30 0.017367

0.179867 1 0.179867 5.41695 0.026878

0.047852 1 0.047852 1.44112 0.239352 0.996134 30 0.033204

0.466538 1 0.466538 14.30693 0.000692

0.000977 1 0.000977 0.02995 0.863772 0.978276 30 0.032609

0.019153 1 0.019153 1.37456 0.250256 0.000977 1 0.000977 0.07009 0.793021 0.418009 30 0.013934

0.000020 1 0.000020 0.00198 0.964801 0.000977 1 0.000977 0.09703 0.757578 0.301937 30 0.010065

0.060288 1 0.060288 2.27615 0.141838 0.106206 1 0.106206 4.00978 0.054348 0.794603 30 0.026487

0.004484 1 0.004484 0.18432 0.670758 0.012456 1 0.012456 0.51199 0.479812 0.729871 30 0.024329

(2)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (% discarded in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p

-i -d f -d f -d p

H-F Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr.Bn Adj. df

TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1 0.00115 0.973200#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.973200 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 1 1.10282 0.302034#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.302034 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 5.41695 0.026878#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.026878 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

1 1.44112 0.239352#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.239352 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 14.30693 0.000692#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000692 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

1 0.02995 0.863772#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.863772 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 1.37456 0.250256#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.250256 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 1 0.07009 0.793021#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.793021 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 0.00198 0.964801#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.964801 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 1 0.09703 0.757578#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.757578 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 2.27615 0.141838#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.141838 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 1 4.00978 0.054348#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.054348 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

1 0.18432 0.670758#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.670758 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 1 0.51199 0.479812#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.479812 1.000000 1.000000 30.00 30

LC; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.4170, p=.02688 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LC -0.05

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25

DV

_

1

(3)

FREQ; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=14.307, p=.00069 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

FREQ -0.05

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

DV

_

1

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (% discarded in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .03261, df = 30.000

Cell No.

FREQ {1} .04688

{2} .13225 1

2

1 0.000818

2 0.000818

group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.3385, p=.25642

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.109933 0.024898 0.059085 0.160781 16 2 0.069196 0.024898 0.018349 0.120044 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00115, p=.97320

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.089844 0.019003 0.051034 0.128654 32 2 0.089286 0.019861 0.048725 0.129847 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.1028, p=.30203

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

(4)

LC; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.4170, p=.02688

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.116071 0.020209 0.074800 0.157343 32 2 0.063058 0.021700 0.018740 0.107376 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.4411, p=.23935

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.122768 0.028580 0.064401 0.181135 16 1 2 0.097098 0.030689 0.034423 0.159773 16 2 1 0.109375 0.028580 0.051008 0.167742 16 2 2 0.029018 0.030689 -0.033657 0.091693 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=14.307, p=.00069

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.046875 0.013387 0.019536 0.074214 32 2 0.132254 0.026371 0.078397 0.186112 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.02995, p=.86377

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.069196 0.018932 0.030533 0.107860 16 1 2 0.150670 0.037295 0.074504 0.226836 16 2 1 0.024554 0.018932 -0.014110 0.063217 16 2 2 0.113839 0.037295 0.037673 0.190005 16

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.3746, p=.25026

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

(5)

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.07009, p=.79302

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.125000 0.036084 0.051306 0.198694 16 1 1 2 0.078125 0.030592 0.015648 0.140602 16 1 2 1 0.120536 0.030388 0.058476 0.182596 16 1 2 2 0.116071 0.036524 0.041480 0.190663 16 2 1 1 0.125000 0.036084 0.051306 0.198694 16 2 1 2 0.031250 0.030592 -0.031227 0.093727 16 2 2 1 0.093750 0.030388 0.031690 0.155810 16 2 2 2 0.026786 0.036524 -0.047805 0.101377 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00198, p=.96480

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.046875 0.017585 0.010961 0.082789 32 1 2 0.132813 0.030123 0.071293 0.194332 32 2 1 0.046875 0.014569 0.017121 0.076629 32 2 2 0.131696 0.027368 0.075803 0.187590 32

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09703, p=.75758

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.062500 0.024869 0.011710 0.113290 16 1 1 2 0.140625 0.042600 0.053624 0.227626 16 1 2 1 0.075893 0.020604 0.033815 0.117971 16 1 2 2 0.160714 0.038705 0.081669 0.239760 16 2 1 1 0.031250 0.024869 -0.019540 0.082040 16 2 1 2 0.125000 0.042600 0.037999 0.212001 16 2 2 1 0.017857 0.020604 -0.024221 0.059935 16 2 2 2 0.102679 0.038705 0.023633 0.181724 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.2761, p=.14184

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

(6)

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=4.0098, p=.05435

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.087054 0.022254 0.041604 0.132503 16 1 1 2 0.158482 0.047732 0.061001 0.255963 16 1 2 1 0.051339 0.022814 0.004746 0.097933 16 1 2 2 0.142857 0.045496 0.049942 0.235772 16 2 1 1 0.029018 0.022254 -0.016432 0.074467 16 2 1 2 0.189732 0.047732 0.092251 0.287213 16 2 2 1 0.020089 0.022814 -0.026504 0.066683 16 2 2 2 0.037946 0.045496 -0.054969 0.130862 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.18432, p=.67076

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.062500 0.029646 0.001954 0.123046 32 1 1 2 0.187500 0.043824 0.097999 0.277001 32 1 2 1 0.031250 0.022097 -0.013878 0.076378 32 1 2 2 0.078125 0.032022 0.012728 0.143522 32 2 1 1 0.053571 0.019764 0.013207 0.093935 32 2 1 2 0.160714 0.030410 0.098610 0.222819 32 2 2 1 0.040179 0.022082 -0.004919 0.085276 32 2 2 2 0.102679 0.036066 0.029022 0.176335 32

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.51199, p=.47981

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 0.093750 0.041926 0.008125 0.179375 16 1 1 1 2 0.156250 0.061977 0.029676 0.282824 16 1 1 2 1 0.031250 0.031250 -0.032571 0.095071 16 1 1 2 2 0.125000 0.045286 0.032515 0.217485 16 1 2 1 1 0.080357 0.027951 0.023274 0.137440 16 1 2 1 2 0.160714 0.043006 0.072885 0.248544 16 1 2 2 1 0.071429 0.031229 0.007651 0.135206 16 1 2 2 2 0.160714 0.051005 0.056548 0.264880 16 2 1 1 1 0.031250 0.041926 -0.054375 0.116875 16 2 1 1 2 0.218750 0.061977 0.092176 0.345324 16 2 1 2 1 0.031250 0.031250 -0.032571 0.095071 16 2 1 2 2 0.031250 0.045286 -0.061235 0.123735 16 2 2 1 1 0.026786 0.027951 -0.030298 0.083869 16 2 2 1 2 0.160714 0.043006 0.072885 0.248544 16 2 2 2 1 0.008929 0.031229 -0.054849 0.072706 16 2 2 2 2 0.044643 0.051005 -0.059523 0.148809 16

2.2 Movement Frequency

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA

Caption

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

(7)

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (frequency in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group

771.9384 1 771.9384 2164.329 0.000000 8.2763 1 8.2763 23.205 0.000039

10.6999 30 0.3567

0.0008 1 0.0008 0.842 0.366122

0.0080 1 0.0080 8.444 0.006819

0.0283 30 0.0009

0.0652 1 0.0652 2.176 0.150570

0.1378 1 0.1378 4.599 0.040212

0.8989 30 0.0300

0.1887 1 0.1887 6.217 0.018394 0.1518 1 0.1518 5.002 0.032897

0.9106 30 0.0304

7.8547 1 7.8547 36.223 0.000001 1.6942 1 1.6942 7.813 0.008959

6.5053 30 0.2168

0.0000 1 0.0000 0.007 0.932782 0.0029 1 0.0029 3.308 0.078938 0.0267 30 0.0009

0.0004 1 0.0004 1.255 0.271531 0.0001 1 0.0001 0.234 0.631921 0.0099 30 0.0003

0.0000 1 0.0000 0.003 0.956681 0.0149 1 0.0149 3.223 0.082692 0.1385 30 0.0046

0.0000 1 0.0000 0.050 0.825263

0.0045 1 0.0045 8.649 0.006249

0.0157 30 0.0005

0.0039 1 0.0039 0.507 0.481995

0.0773 1 0.0773 10.009 0.003556

0.2317 30 0.0077

0.0021 1 0.0021 0.190 0.666151 0.0238 1 0.0238 2.113 0.156426 0.3374 30 0.0112

0.0010 1 0.0010 3.288 0.079800 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.093 0.762166 0.0092 30 0.0003

0.0003 1 0.0003 0.402 0.530930 0.0019 1 0.0019 2.678 0.112175 0.0215 30 0.0007

0.0000 1 0.0000 0.038 0.846718 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.141 0.710289 0.0070 30 0.0002

0.0071 1 0.0071 0.845 0.365272 0.0060 1 0.0060 0.717 0.403892 0.2516 30 0.0084

(8)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p

-i -d f -d f -d p

H-F Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Low Ad

LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1 0.84208 0.366122#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.366122 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 8.44424 0.006819#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.006819 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 2.17630 0.150570#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.150570 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 4.59897 0.040212#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.040212 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 6.21719 0.018394#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.018394 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 5.00242 0.032897#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.032897 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 36.22252 0.000001#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000001 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 7.81279 0.008959#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.008959 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 0.00723 0.932782#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.932782 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 3.30804 0.078938#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.078938 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 1.25477 0.271531#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.271531 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.23423 0.631921#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.631921 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.00300 0.956681#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.956681 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 3.22299 0.082692#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.082692 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.04960 0.825263#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.825263 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 8.64922 0.006249#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.006249 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 0.50688 0.481995#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.481995 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 10.00896 0.003556#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.003556 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 0.18986 0.666151#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.666151 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 2.11309 0.156426#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.156426 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 3.28810 0.079800#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.079800 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.09327 0.762166#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.762166 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.40187 0.530930#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.530930 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 2.67829 0.112175#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.112175 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.03802 0.846718#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.846718 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.14063 0.710289#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.710289 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.84511 0.365272#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.365272 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.71682 0.403892#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.403892 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 3.20807 0.083371#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.083371 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 3.49157 0.071475#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.071475 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

(9)

LIMB*group; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=8.4442, p=.00682 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2

1 2

LIMB 0.8

0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

DV

_

1

T ASK*gro up; LS Me an s

Current effect: F(1, 30)=4.5990, p=.04021 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2

1 2

TASK 0.7

0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

DV

_

1

(10)

LC; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=6.2172, p=.01839 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LC 1.0

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

DV

_

1

LC*group; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.0024, p=.03290 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2

1 2

LC 0.7

0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

DV

_

1

(11)

FREQ; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=36.223, p=.00000 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

FREQ 0.8

0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

DV

_

1

FREQ*group; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=7.8128, p=.00896 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2

1 2

FREQ 0.6

0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

DV

_

1

(12)

LIMB*FREQ*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 30)=8.6492, p=.00625

Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2 LIMB: 1

FREQ: 1 2

0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9

DV

_

1

LIMB: 2

FREQ: 1 2

T ASK*F REQ*grou p; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.009, p=.00356

Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2 TASK: 1

FREQ: 1 2

0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0

DV

_

1

TASK: 2

FREQ: 1 2

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02235, df = 30.158

Cell No.

group LIMB {1} 1.1059

{2} 1.0956

{3} 1.3523

{4} 1.3577 1

2 3

1 1 0.051869 0.012712 0.000384

1 2 0.051869 0.000329 0.007510

(13)

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02416, df = 35.005

Cell No.

group TASK {1} 1.1059

{2} 1.0956

{3} 1.3273

{4} 1.3827 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.964445 0.028438 0.000233

1 2 0.964445 0.001044 0.003208

2 1 0.028438 0.001044 0.070924 2 2 0.000233 0.003208 0.070924

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02419, df = 35.069

Cell No.

group LC {1} 1.0988

{2} 1.1027

{3} 1.3186

{4} 1.3914 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.997891 0.029927 0.000186

1 2 0.997891 0.002201 0.003030

2 1 0.029927 0.002201 0.011401

2 2 0.000186 0.003030 0.011401

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .03584, df = 56.634

Cell No.

group FREQ {1} 1.0344

{2} 1.1671

{3} 1.1736

{4} 1.5364 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.125748 0.264288 0.000158

1 2 0.125748 0.999700 0.000292

2 1 0.264288 0.999700 0.000162

2 2 0.000158 0.000292 0.000162

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .04465, df = 30.088

Cell No.

group LIMB FREQ {1} 1.0364

{2} 1.1755

{3} 1.0324

{4} 1.1587

{5} 1.1737

{6} 1.5310

{7} 1.1736

{8} 1.5418 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.000141 0.972993 0.000141 0.891634 0.000145 0.601787 0.000143

1 1 2 0.000141 0.000141 0.005517 1.000000 0.038520 1.000000 0.000815

1 2 1 0.972993 0.000141 0.000141 0.567086 0.000144 0.877182 0.000143

1 2 2 0.000141 0.005517 0.000141 0.999999 0.000681 0.999999 0.020550

2 1 1 0.891634 1.000000 0.567086 0.999999 0.000141 1.000000 0.000141

2 1 2 0.000145 0.038520 0.000144 0.000681 0.000141 0.000141 0.163424 2 2 1 0.601787 1.000000 0.877182 0.999999 1.000000 0.000141 0.000141

2 2 2 0.000143 0.000815 0.000143 0.020550 0.000141 0.163424 0.000141

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .04555, df = 31.299

Cell No.

group TASK FREQ {1} 1.0300

{2} 1.1817

{3} 1.0388

{4} 1.1524

{5} 1.1610

{6} 1.4937

{7} 1.1863

{8} 1.5791 1

2 3 4 5

1 1 1 0.000141 0.999087 0.000141 0.912792 0.000152 0.454172 0.000139

1 1 2 0.000141 0.000141 0.570924 0.999993 0.096667 1.000000 0.000355

1 2 1 0.999087 0.000141 0.000142 0.735532 0.000159 0.851628 0.000139

1 2 2 0.000141 0.570924 0.000142 1.000000 0.001984 0.999805 0.007292

2 1 1 0.912792 0.999993 0.735532 1.000000 0.000141 0.730853 0.000141

(14)

group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=23.205, p=.00004

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.100741 0.037326 1.024512 1.176971 16 2 1.355021 0.037326 1.278792 1.431251 16

LIMB; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.84208, p=.36612 Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.229126 0.026157 1.175706 1.282545 32 2 1.226636 0.026697 1.172114 1.281159 32

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=8.4442, p=.00682

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.105927 0.036991 1.030381 1.181474 16 1 2 1.095555 0.037755 1.018449 1.172661 16 2 1 1.352324 0.036991 1.276778 1.427871 16 2 2 1.357718 0.037755 1.280612 1.434824 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.1763, p=.15057

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.216596 0.026567 1.162338 1.270853 32 2 1.239167 0.028363 1.181242 1.297092 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=4.5990, p=.04021

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.105861 0.037572 1.029130 1.182593 16 1 2 1.095621 0.040111 1.013703 1.177539 16 2 1 1.327330 0.037572 1.250598 1.404061 16 2 2 1.382713 0.040111 1.300795 1.464631 16

LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=6.2172, p=.01839 Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.208683 0.026902 1.153741 1.263625 32 2 1.247079 0.028072 1.189748 1.304411 32

(15)

LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.0024, p=.03290

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.098764 0.038045 1.021064 1.176463 16 1 2 1.102719 0.039700 1.021640 1.183797 16 2 1 1.318602 0.038045 1.240903 1.396301 16 2 2 1.391440 0.039700 1.310361 1.472519 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=36.223, p=.00000

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.104022 0.030921 1.040873 1.167171 32 2 1.351741 0.035835 1.278555 1.424926 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=7.8128, p=.00896

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.034405 0.043729 0.945099 1.123711 16 1 2 1.167077 0.050679 1.063578 1.270577 16 2 1 1.173639 0.043729 1.084333 1.262945 16 2 2 1.536404 0.050679 1.432904 1.639904 16

LIMB*TASK; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00723, p=.93278

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.217728 0.026634 1.163335 1.272121 32 1 2 1.240523 0.028244 1.182842 1.298205 32 2 1 1.215463 0.026732 1.160868 1.270058 32 2 2 1.237810 0.028516 1.179573 1.296047 32

LIMB*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.3080, p=.07894

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

(16)

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.2548, p=.27153

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.209027 0.026731 1.154435 1.263619 32 1 2 1.249224 0.027658 1.192740 1.305709 32 2 1 1.208339 0.027146 1.152900 1.263777 32 2 2 1.244934 0.028585 1.186555 1.303313 32

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.23423, p=.63192

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.102660 0.037803 1.025456 1.179865 16 1 1 2 1.109194 0.039114 1.029312 1.189076 16 1 2 1 1.094867 0.038390 1.016465 1.173269 16 1 2 2 1.096243 0.040426 1.013683 1.178803 16 2 1 1 1.315394 0.037803 1.238189 1.392599 16 2 1 2 1.389255 0.039114 1.309373 1.469136 16 2 2 1 1.321810 0.038390 1.243408 1.400212 16 2 2 2 1.393626 0.040426 1.311065 1.476186 16

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00300, p=.95668

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.197233 0.028953 1.138103 1.256362 32 1 2 1.235958 0.027171 1.180467 1.291449 32 2 1 1.220133 0.027368 1.164240 1.276026 32 2 2 1.258200 0.031116 1.194654 1.321747 32

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.2230, p=.08269

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.109111 0.040946 1.025489 1.192733 16 1 1 2 1.102612 0.038426 1.024136 1.181088 16 1 2 1 1.088417 0.038704 1.009372 1.167462 16 1 2 2 1.102825 0.044004 1.012957 1.192694 16 2 1 1 1.285355 0.040946 1.201733 1.368977 16 2 1 2 1.369305 0.038426 1.290829 1.447781 16 2 2 1 1.351850 0.038704 1.272805 1.430895 16 2 2 2 1.413576 0.044004 1.323707 1.503444 16

LIMB*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.04960, p=.82526

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

(17)

LIMB*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=8.6492, p=.00625

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.036397 0.043750 0.947047 1.125747 16 1 1 2 1.175457 0.050194 1.072947 1.277968 16 1 2 1 1.032413 0.043736 0.943092 1.121734 16 1 2 2 1.158697 0.051357 1.053812 1.263583 16 2 1 1 1.173686 0.043750 1.084336 1.263036 16 2 1 2 1.530963 0.050194 1.428453 1.633473 16 2 2 1 1.173591 0.043736 1.084270 1.262912 16 2 2 2 1.541845 0.051357 1.436959 1.646730 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.50688, p=.48199

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.095501 0.032449 1.029232 1.161771 32 1 2 1.337690 0.034467 1.267299 1.408080 32 2 1 1.112542 0.030530 1.050193 1.174892 32 2 2 1.365791 0.040025 1.284049 1.447534 32

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.009, p=.00356

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.030003 0.045890 0.936284 1.123722 16 1 1 2 1.181720 0.048743 1.082172 1.281267 16 1 2 1 1.038807 0.043175 0.950631 1.126982 16 1 2 2 1.152435 0.056604 1.036834 1.268037 16 2 1 1 1.160999 0.045890 1.067280 1.254718 16 2 1 2 1.493660 0.048743 1.394113 1.593208 16 2 2 1 1.186278 0.043175 1.098102 1.274454 16 2 2 2 1.579147 0.056604 1.463546 1.694749 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.18986, p=.66615

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

(18)

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.1131, p=.15643

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.027656 0.042248 0.941374 1.113939 16 1 1 2 1.169871 0.048926 1.069950 1.269792 16 1 2 1 1.041153 0.048052 0.943019 1.139288 16 1 2 2 1.164284 0.055887 1.050146 1.278421 16 2 1 1 1.146075 0.042248 1.059793 1.232358 16 2 1 2 1.491129 0.048926 1.391208 1.591050 16 2 2 1 1.201202 0.048052 1.103067 1.299337 16 2 2 2 1.581678 0.055887 1.467541 1.695816 16

LIMB*TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.2881, p=.07980

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.196059 0.029035 1.136762 1.255355 32 1 1 2 1.239398 0.027020 1.184216 1.294579 32 1 2 1 1.221996 0.027282 1.166279 1.277712 32 1 2 2 1.259051 0.030960 1.195822 1.322281 32 2 1 1 1.198407 0.029086 1.139006 1.257808 32 2 1 2 1.232519 0.027698 1.175951 1.289086 32 2 2 1 1.218270 0.027523 1.162061 1.274480 32 2 2 2 1.257350 0.031296 1.193434 1.321265 32

LIMB*TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09327, p=.76217

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

(19)

LIMB*TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.40187, p=.53093

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.097159 0.032465 1.030857 1.163462 32 1 1 2 1.338297 0.034652 1.267529 1.409065 32 1 2 1 1.112924 0.030489 1.050657 1.175191 32 1 2 2 1.368123 0.040080 1.286269 1.449978 32 2 1 1 1.093843 0.032465 1.027541 1.160145 32 2 1 2 1.337083 0.034845 1.265920 1.408246 32 2 2 1 1.112161 0.030604 1.049659 1.174663 32 2 2 2 1.363459 0.040030 1.281706 1.445212 32

LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.6783, p=.11217

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 1.033092 0.045912 0.939326 1.126858 16 1 1 1 2 1.193570 0.049005 1.093489 1.293652 16 1 1 2 1 1.039702 0.043118 0.951643 1.127761 16 1 1 2 2 1.157345 0.056682 1.041585 1.273104 16 1 2 1 1 1.026914 0.045912 0.933149 1.120679 16 1 2 1 2 1.169869 0.049278 1.069229 1.270508 16 1 2 2 1 1.037912 0.043281 0.949520 1.126303 16 1 2 2 2 1.147526 0.056612 1.031910 1.263142 16 2 1 1 1 1.161227 0.045912 1.067461 1.254992 16 2 1 1 2 1.483023 0.049005 1.382942 1.583105 16 2 1 2 1 1.186146 0.043118 1.098087 1.274204 16 2 1 2 2 1.578902 0.056682 1.463142 1.694662 16 2 2 1 1 1.160772 0.045912 1.067007 1.254537 16 2 2 1 2 1.504297 0.049278 1.403658 1.604936 16 2 2 2 1 1.186410 0.043281 1.098019 1.274802 16 2 2 2 2 1.579393 0.056612 1.463776 1.695009 16

LIMB*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.03802, p=.84672

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

(20)

LIMB*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.14063, p=.71029

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 1.027975 0.042464 0.941253 1.114698 16 1 1 1 2 1.177346 0.048666 1.077957 1.276734 16 1 1 2 1 1.044819 0.047889 0.947016 1.142621 16 1 1 2 2 1.173569 0.054905 1.061439 1.285700 16 1 2 1 1 1.027338 0.042089 0.941379 1.113296 16 1 2 1 2 1.162397 0.049430 1.061447 1.263347 16 1 2 2 1 1.037488 0.048265 0.938918 1.136058 16 1 2 2 2 1.154998 0.057112 1.038360 1.271636 16 2 1 1 1 1.145733 0.042464 1.059010 1.232455 16 2 1 1 2 1.485055 0.048666 1.385667 1.584444 16 2 1 2 1 1.201640 0.047889 1.103837 1.299442 16 2 1 2 2 1.576870 0.054905 1.464739 1.689000 16 2 2 1 1 1.146418 0.042089 1.060460 1.232376 16 2 2 1 2 1.497203 0.049430 1.396253 1.598153 16 2 2 2 1 1.200764 0.048265 1.102194 1.299334 16 2 2 2 2 1.586487 0.057112 1.469849 1.703124 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.84511, p=.36527

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.074460 0.031749 1.009621 1.139299 32 1 1 2 1.320005 0.035424 1.247661 1.392350 32 1 2 1 1.116542 0.036707 1.041576 1.191508 32 1 2 2 1.355374 0.038110 1.277544 1.433204 32 2 1 1 1.099272 0.030004 1.037995 1.160548 32 2 1 2 1.340995 0.037781 1.263836 1.418153 32 2 2 1 1.125813 0.032426 1.059590 1.192036 32 2 2 2 1.390588 0.044289 1.300138 1.481038 32

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.71682, p=.40389

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

(21)

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.2081, p=.08337

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

(22)

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.4916, p=.07148

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

1 1 1 1 1 1.021531 0.044891 0.929851 1.113212 16 1 1 1 1 2 1.206712 0.050710 1.103149 1.310276 16 1 1 1 2 1 1.044653 0.051984 0.938488 1.150819 16 1 1 1 2 2 1.180428 0.053532 1.071102 1.289754 16 1 1 2 1 1 1.034419 0.042562 0.947496 1.121343 16 1 1 2 1 2 1.147979 0.053726 1.038256 1.257702 16 1 1 2 2 1 1.044984 0.045590 0.951878 1.138091 16 1 1 2 2 2 1.166711 0.062422 1.039228 1.294194 16 1 2 1 1 1 1.021138 0.044933 0.929372 1.112903 16 1 2 1 1 2 1.187063 0.050375 1.084183 1.289942 16 1 2 1 2 1 1.032691 0.051962 0.926570 1.138811 16 1 2 1 2 2 1.152675 0.055291 1.039755 1.265595 16 1 2 2 1 1 1.033538 0.042455 0.946833 1.120242 16 1 2 2 1 2 1.137731 0.053281 1.028917 1.246545 16 1 2 2 2 1 1.042285 0.046153 0.948027 1.136543 16 1 2 2 2 2 1.157321 0.062921 1.028819 1.285823 16 2 1 1 1 1 1.128112 0.044891 1.036432 1.219793 16 2 1 1 1 2 1.427878 0.050710 1.324315 1.531442 16 2 1 1 2 1 1.194341 0.051984 1.088175 1.300506 16 2 1 1 2 2 1.538169 0.053532 1.428843 1.647495 16 2 1 2 1 1 1.163353 0.042562 1.076429 1.250277 16 2 1 2 1 2 1.542232 0.053726 1.432509 1.651955 16 2 1 2 2 1 1.208938 0.045590 1.115832 1.302045 16 2 1 2 2 2 1.615571 0.062422 1.488088 1.743054 16 2 2 1 1 1 1.127059 0.044933 1.035294 1.218825 16 2 2 1 1 2 1.458369 0.050375 1.355490 1.561248 16 2 2 1 2 1 1.194484 0.051962 1.088364 1.300605 16 2 2 1 2 2 1.550225 0.055291 1.437305 1.663145 16 2 2 2 1 1 1.165777 0.042455 1.079072 1.252481 16 2 2 2 1 2 1.536036 0.053281 1.427223 1.644850 16 2 2 2 2 1 1.207044 0.046153 1.112786 1.301302 16 2 2 2 2 2 1.622749 0.062921 1.494247 1.751250 16

2.3 Coefficient of Variation for Movement Frequency

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA

Caption

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Task: 1= single task, 2= dual task

Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Frequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible

(23)

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1.786376 1 1.786376 472.4344 0.000000

0.006094 1 0.006094 1.6116 0.214024 0.113436 30 0.003781

0.076636 1 0.076636 49.9127 0.000000

0.001795 1 0.001795 1.1691 0.288211 0.046062 30 0.001535

0.000122 1 0.000122 0.1177 0.733972 0.002328 1 0.002328 2.2530 0.143806 0.030992 30 0.001033

0.007660 1 0.007660 10.8953 0.002494

0.000470 1 0.000470 0.6680 0.420182 0.021090 30 0.000703

0.026723 1 0.026723 23.5160 0.000036

0.001197 1 0.001197 1.0535 0.312909 0.034091 30 0.001136

0.000228 1 0.000228 0.3955 0.534187

0.003109 1 0.003109 5.3946 0.027169

0.017287 30 0.000576

0.000390 1 0.000390 0.5680 0.456933

0.003561 1 0.003561 5.1811 0.030138

0.020617 30 0.000687

0.000239 1 0.000239 0.3698 0.547671 0.000296 1 0.000296 0.4576 0.503940 0.019417 30 0.000647

0.001292 1 0.001292 2.8302 0.102888 0.000803 1 0.000803 1.7593 0.194724 0.013691 30 0.000456

0.004999 1 0.004999 5.0919 0.031482

0.000861 1 0.000861 0.8771 0.356479 0.029456 30 0.000982

0.000633 1 0.000633 0.8553 0.362434 0.000215 1 0.000215 0.2901 0.594162 0.022207 30 0.000740

0.000023 1 0.000023 0.0931 0.762440 0.000014 1 0.000014 0.0570 0.812847 0.007472 30 0.000249

0.000352 1 0.000352 0.9702 0.332514 0.000221 1 0.000221 0.6087 0.441402 0.010879 30 0.000363

0.000246 1 0.000246 0.7416 0.395979 0.000140 1 0.000140 0.4230 0.520403 0.009937 30 0.000331

0.000043 1 0.000043 0.1305 0.720476 0.000348 1 0.000348 1.0532 0.312983 0.009903 30 0.000330

0.000105 1 0.000105 0.1876 0.668034 0.000056 1 0.000056 0.1000 0.754049 0.016755 30 0.000559

(24)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p

-i -d f -d f -d p

H-F Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr Adj

LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1 49.91268 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 1.16905 0.288211 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.288211 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.11767 0.733972 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.733972 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 2.25303 0.143806 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.143806 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 10.89525 0.002494 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.002494 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 0.66803 0.420182 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.420182 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 23.51601 0.000036 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000036 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 1.05349 0.312909 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.312909 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.39549 0.534187 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.534187 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 5.39460 0.027169 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.027169 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 0.56799 0.456933 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.456933 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 5.18106 0.030138 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.030138 1.000000 1.000000 30

30

1 0.36984 0.547671 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.547671 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.45758 0.503940 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.503940 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 2.83020 0.102888 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.102888 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 1.75928 0.194724 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.194724 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 5.09190 0.031482 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.031482 1.000000 1.000000 30

1 0.87709 0.356479 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.356479 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.85531 0.362434 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.362434 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.29005 0.594162 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.594162 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.09305 0.762440 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.762440 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.05705 0.812847 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.812847 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.97017 0.332514 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.332514 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.60867 0.441402 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.441402 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.74160 0.395979 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.395979 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.42298 0.520403 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.520403 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.13047 0.720476 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.720476 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 1.05317 0.312983 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.312983 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

1 0.18758 0.668034 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.668034 1.000000 1.000000 30 1 0.09998 0.754049 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.754049 1.000000 1.000000 30 30

(25)

LIMB; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=49.913, p=.00000 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LIMB 0.02

0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10

DV

_

1

LC; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.895, p=.00249 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LC 0.03

0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09

DV

_

1

(26)

FREQ; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=23.516, p=.00004 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

FREQ 0.03

0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10

DV

_

1

LIMB*T ASK*g roup ; LS Mean s Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.3946, p=.02717

Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertica l bars d enote 0.95 co nfid ence in te rvals

group 1 group

2 LIMB: 1

TASK: 1 2

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12

DV

_

1

LIMB: 2

TASK: 1 2

(27)

LIMB*LC*group; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.1811, p=.03014 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2 LIMB: 1

LC: 1 2

0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11

DV

_

1

LIMB: 2

LC: 1 2

TASK*FREQ; L S Mea ns

Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.0919, p=.03148 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

TASK 1 TASK

2

1 2

FREQ 0.03

0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10

DV

_

1

(28)

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .00054, df = 38.936

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK {1} .06120

{2} .07076

{3} .04674

{4} .04377

{5} .08104

{6} .07221

{7} .04923

{8} .04759 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.352064 0.035025 0.006143 0.609142 0.880270 0.827807 0.717790 1 1 2 0.352064 0.000215 0.000150 0.912455 1.000000 0.183825 0.122539 1 2 1 0.035025 0.000215 0.996389 0.003968 0.065787 0.999998 1.000000 1 2 2 0.006143 0.000150 0.996389 0.001458 0.027210 0.997578 0.999962 2 1 1 0.609142 0.912455 0.003968 0.001458 0.448764 0.000141 0.000141

2 1 2 0.880270 1.000000 0.065787 0.027210 0.448764 0.000295 0.000189

2 2 1 0.827807 0.183825 0.999998 0.997578 0.000141 0.000295 0.999926 2 2 2 0.717790 0.122539 1.000000 0.999962 0.000141 0.000189 0.999926

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .00056, df = 40.556

Cell No.

group LIMB LC {1} .07065

{2} .06131

{3} .04640

{4} .04411

{5} .07794

{6} .07531

{7} .05675

{8} .04008 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.487886 0.000408 0.000201 0.997261 0.999234 0.709164 0.015144

1 1 2 0.487886 0.054569 0.016815 0.500404 0.896185 0.999331 0.208020 1 2 1 0.000408 0.054569 0.999623 0.011089 0.025713 0.977855 0.994433 1 2 2 0.000201 0.016815 0.999623 0.005152 0.012387 0.796429 0.999945 2 1 1 0.997261 0.500404 0.011089 0.005152 0.999077 0.001868 0.000141

2 1 2 0.999234 0.896185 0.025713 0.012387 0.999077 0.008000 0.000141

2 2 1 0.709164 0.999331 0.977855 0.796429 0.001868 0.008000 0.022203

2 2 2 0.015144 0.208020 0.994433 0.999945 0.000141 0.000141 0.022203

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00098, df = 30.000

Cell No.

TASK FREQ {1} .04921

{2} .06990

{3} .05448

{4} .06268 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.000207 0.541488 0.008988

1 2 0.000207 0.002527 0.273287 2 1 0.541488 0.002527 0.178479 2 2 0.008988 0.273287 0.178479

group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.6116, p=.21402

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.055618 0.003843 0.047769 0.063467 16 2 0.062518 0.003843 0.054669 0.070367 16

LIMB; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=49.913, p=.00000

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.071302 0.003531 0.064092 0.078513 32 2 0.046834 0.002881 0.040949 0.052718 32

(29)

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.1691, p=.28821

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.065980 0.004993 0.055783 0.076177 16 1 2 0.045256 0.004075 0.036934 0.053578 16 2 1 0.076625 0.004993 0.066427 0.086822 16 2 2 0.048411 0.004075 0.040089 0.056733 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.11767, p=.73397

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.059555 0.003164 0.053094 0.066016 32 2 0.058581 0.002966 0.052523 0.064638 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.2530, p=.14381

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.053973 0.004474 0.044836 0.063110 16 1 2 0.057263 0.004195 0.048696 0.065830 16 2 1 0.065137 0.004474 0.056000 0.074274 16 2 2 0.059898 0.004195 0.051332 0.068465 16

LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.895, p=.00249

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.062936 0.002702 0.057417 0.068454 32 2 0.055200 0.003196 0.048673 0.061728 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.66803, p=.42018

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.058528 0.003821 0.050724 0.066332 16 1 2 0.052708 0.004520 0.043477 0.061939 16 2 1 0.067343 0.003821 0.059539 0.075147 16 2 2 0.057692 0.004520 0.048461 0.066924 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=23.516, p=.00004

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.051843 0.002196 0.047358 0.056329 32 2 0.066292 0.003793 0.058546 0.074038 32

(30)

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.0535, p=.31291

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.049923 0.003106 0.043579 0.056266 16 1 2 0.061313 0.005364 0.050359 0.072268 16 2 1 0.053764 0.003106 0.047421 0.060107 16 2 2 0.071271 0.005364 0.060317 0.082226 16

LIMB*TASK; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.39549, p=.53419

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.071122 0.004292 0.062356 0.079888 32 1 2 0.071482 0.003755 0.063813 0.079152 32 2 1 0.047988 0.003387 0.041070 0.054906 32 2 2 0.045679 0.003179 0.039187 0.052172 32

LIMB*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.3946, p=.02717

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.061204 0.006070 0.048807 0.073601 16 1 1 2 0.070756 0.005311 0.059909 0.081603 16 1 2 1 0.046742 0.004791 0.036959 0.056526 16 1 2 2 0.043770 0.004496 0.034588 0.052951 16 2 1 1 0.081041 0.006070 0.068644 0.093438 16 2 1 2 0.072208 0.005311 0.061362 0.083055 16 2 2 1 0.049234 0.004791 0.039450 0.059017 16 2 2 2 0.047589 0.004496 0.038407 0.056770 16

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.56799, p=.45693

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.074297 0.003992 0.066144 0.082450 32 1 2 0.068308 0.003662 0.060828 0.075787 32 2 1 0.051575 0.002757 0.045945 0.057204 32 2 2 0.042093 0.003930 0.034066 0.050119 32

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.1811, p=.03014

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5

(31)

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.36984, p=.54767

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.062739 0.003258 0.056085 0.069394 32 1 2 0.056371 0.004226 0.047740 0.065003 32 2 1 0.063132 0.003491 0.056003 0.070261 32 2 2 0.054029 0.002738 0.048438 0.059621 32

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.45758, p=.50394

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.056960 0.004608 0.047549 0.066371 16 1 1 2 0.050986 0.005977 0.038779 0.063193 16 1 2 1 0.060096 0.004937 0.050014 0.070178 16 1 2 2 0.054430 0.003872 0.046522 0.062337 16 2 1 1 0.068518 0.004608 0.059108 0.077929 16 2 1 2 0.061756 0.005977 0.049549 0.073963 16 2 2 1 0.066168 0.004937 0.056086 0.076250 16 2 2 2 0.053629 0.003872 0.045721 0.061536 16

LIMB*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.8302, p=.10289

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.062489 0.002670 0.057036 0.067943 32 1 2 0.080115 0.005123 0.069652 0.090578 32 2 1 0.041197 0.002800 0.035479 0.046916 32 2 2 0.052470 0.003572 0.045175 0.059765 32

LIMB*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.7593, p=.19472

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.059949 0.003776 0.052236 0.067661 16 1 1 2 0.072011 0.007246 0.057214 0.086809 16 1 2 1 0.039897 0.003960 0.031809 0.047984 16 1 2 2 0.050615 0.005052 0.040299 0.060932 16 2 1 1 0.065030 0.003776 0.057318 0.072743 16 2 1 2 0.088219 0.007246 0.073421 0.103016 16 2 2 1 0.042498 0.003960 0.034411 0.050585 16 2 2 2 0.054324 0.005052 0.044007 0.064641 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.0919, p=.03148

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

(32)

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.87709, p=.35648

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.046450 0.003074 0.040171 0.052729 16 1 1 2 0.061496 0.007334 0.046518 0.076474 16 1 2 1 0.053395 0.004356 0.044500 0.062291 16 1 2 2 0.061130 0.005110 0.050695 0.071566 16 2 1 1 0.051962 0.003074 0.045683 0.058241 16 2 1 2 0.078313 0.007334 0.063335 0.093291 16 2 2 1 0.055567 0.004356 0.046671 0.064462 16 2 2 2 0.064230 0.005110 0.053795 0.074666 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.85531, p=.36243

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.054599 0.002370 0.049759 0.059440 32 1 2 0.071272 0.004128 0.062843 0.079702 32 2 1 0.049088 0.002912 0.043141 0.055034 32 2 2 0.061313 0.004308 0.052514 0.070111 32

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.29005, p=.59416

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.051073 0.003352 0.044228 0.057918 16 1 1 2 0.065983 0.005837 0.054062 0.077904 16 1 2 1 0.048772 0.004118 0.040362 0.057182 16 1 2 2 0.056644 0.006093 0.044200 0.069087 16 2 1 1 0.058125 0.003352 0.051280 0.064971 16 2 1 2 0.076561 0.005837 0.064640 0.088483 16 2 2 1 0.049403 0.004118 0.040993 0.057813 16 2 2 2 0.065981 0.006093 0.053538 0.078425 16

LIMB*TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09305, p=.76244

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

(33)

LIMB*TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.05705, p=.81285

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 0.065908 0.007670 0.050245 0.081572 16 1 1 1 2 0.056499 0.006532 0.043159 0.069839 16 1 1 2 1 0.075399 0.005983 0.063181 0.087618 16 1 1 2 2 0.066113 0.005001 0.055900 0.076325 16 1 2 1 1 0.048011 0.004254 0.039324 0.056699 16 1 2 1 2 0.045473 0.007453 0.030253 0.060693 16 1 2 2 1 0.044793 0.005846 0.032853 0.056732 16 1 2 2 2 0.042746 0.004217 0.034135 0.051358 16 2 1 1 1 0.080532 0.007670 0.064869 0.096196 16 2 1 1 2 0.081549 0.006532 0.068209 0.094889 16 2 1 2 1 0.075347 0.005983 0.063129 0.087566 16 2 1 2 2 0.069069 0.005001 0.058857 0.079282 16 2 2 1 1 0.056504 0.004254 0.047817 0.065192 16 2 2 1 2 0.041963 0.007453 0.026743 0.057183 16 2 2 2 1 0.056989 0.005846 0.045050 0.068929 16 2 2 2 2 0.038188 0.004217 0.029576 0.046800 16

LIMB*TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.97017, p=.33251

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.058356 0.002928 0.052376 0.064335 32 1 1 2 0.083889 0.007344 0.068890 0.098888 32 1 2 1 0.066623 0.003168 0.060154 0.073092 32 1 2 2 0.076341 0.004904 0.066326 0.086356 32 2 1 1 0.040056 0.002632 0.034681 0.045430 32 2 1 2 0.055920 0.004853 0.046009 0.065831 32 2 2 1 0.042339 0.003971 0.034229 0.050449 32 2 2 2 0.049019 0.003358 0.042162 0.055876 32

LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.60867, p=.44140

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

(34)

LIMB*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.74160, p=.39598

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.065065 0.003161 0.058608 0.071521 32 1 1 2 0.083529 0.006302 0.070659 0.096399 32 1 2 1 0.059914 0.003003 0.053781 0.066047 32 1 2 2 0.076701 0.005155 0.066174 0.087228 32 2 1 1 0.044134 0.003182 0.037635 0.050632 32 2 1 2 0.059015 0.003563 0.051738 0.066292 32 2 2 1 0.038261 0.003821 0.030458 0.046065 32 2 2 2 0.045924 0.004869 0.035981 0.055868 32

LIMB*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.42298, p=.52040

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 0.063032 0.004471 0.053902 0.072163 16 1 1 1 2 0.078275 0.008912 0.060074 0.096477 16 1 1 2 1 0.056865 0.004247 0.048191 0.065538 16 1 1 2 2 0.065747 0.007290 0.050860 0.080635 16 1 2 1 1 0.039114 0.004500 0.029923 0.048304 16 1 2 1 2 0.053691 0.005039 0.043399 0.063982 16 1 2 2 1 0.040680 0.005404 0.029644 0.051715 16 1 2 2 2 0.047540 0.006886 0.033478 0.061602 16 2 1 1 1 0.067097 0.004471 0.057966 0.076228 16 2 1 1 2 0.088783 0.008912 0.070582 0.106984 16 2 1 2 1 0.062964 0.004247 0.054291 0.071637 16 2 1 2 2 0.087655 0.007290 0.072767 0.102542 16 2 2 1 1 0.049154 0.004500 0.039963 0.058344 16 2 2 1 2 0.064340 0.005039 0.054049 0.074631 16 2 2 2 1 0.035843 0.005404 0.024807 0.046878 16 2 2 2 2 0.044308 0.006886 0.030246 0.058370 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.13047, p=.72048

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

(35)

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.0532, p=.31298

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 0.046563 0.003589 0.039233 0.053893 16 1 1 1 2 0.067357 0.008340 0.050323 0.084390 16 1 1 2 1 0.046337 0.005318 0.035477 0.057196 16 1 1 2 2 0.055636 0.008760 0.037745 0.073527 16 1 2 1 1 0.055583 0.005509 0.044331 0.066835 16 1 2 1 2 0.064609 0.005909 0.052541 0.076677 16 1 2 2 1 0.051208 0.004000 0.043038 0.059377 16 1 2 2 2 0.057651 0.004852 0.047741 0.067561 16 2 1 1 1 0.055413 0.003589 0.048083 0.062742 16 2 1 1 2 0.081624 0.008340 0.064591 0.098658 16 2 1 2 1 0.048511 0.005318 0.037651 0.059371 16 2 1 2 2 0.075001 0.008760 0.057110 0.092891 16 2 2 1 1 0.060838 0.005509 0.049586 0.072090 16 2 2 1 2 0.071499 0.005909 0.059430 0.083567 16 2 2 2 1 0.050295 0.004000 0.042126 0.058465 16 2 2 2 2 0.056962 0.004852 0.047052 0.066872 16

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.18758, p=.66803

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

(36)

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw) Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09998, p=.75405

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

1 1 1 1 1 0.055295 0.005350 0.044368 0.066222 16 1 1 1 1 2 0.076522 0.014012 0.047905 0.105139 16 1 1 1 2 1 0.051049 0.005574 0.039665 0.062434 16 1 1 1 2 2 0.061949 0.010422 0.040664 0.083234 16 1 1 2 1 1 0.070770 0.005406 0.059729 0.081811 16 1 1 2 1 2 0.080029 0.007881 0.063934 0.096124 16 1 1 2 2 1 0.062680 0.004362 0.053771 0.071588 16 1 1 2 2 2 0.069546 0.006710 0.055841 0.083250 16 1 2 1 1 1 0.037831 0.004097 0.029464 0.046198 16 1 2 1 1 2 0.058192 0.007344 0.043194 0.073189 16 1 2 1 2 1 0.041624 0.006851 0.027631 0.055616 16 1 2 1 2 2 0.049323 0.009875 0.029156 0.069490 16 1 2 2 1 1 0.040396 0.008187 0.023677 0.057115 16 1 2 2 1 2 0.049190 0.005769 0.037408 0.060971 16 1 2 2 2 1 0.039736 0.004840 0.029851 0.049620 16 1 2 2 2 2 0.045757 0.004787 0.035980 0.055534 16 2 1 1 1 1 0.065099 0.005350 0.054172 0.076026 16 2 1 1 1 2 0.095966 0.014012 0.067349 0.124583 16 2 1 1 2 1 0.061980 0.005574 0.050595 0.073364 16 2 1 1 2 2 0.101118 0.010422 0.079834 0.122403 16 2 1 2 1 1 0.069095 0.005406 0.058054 0.080136 16 2 1 2 1 2 0.081599 0.007881 0.065504 0.097694 16 2 1 2 2 1 0.063948 0.004362 0.055039 0.072856 16 2 1 2 2 2 0.074191 0.006710 0.060486 0.087896 16 2 2 1 1 1 0.045726 0.004097 0.037359 0.054093 16 2 2 1 1 2 0.067283 0.007344 0.052285 0.082280 16 2 2 1 2 1 0.035042 0.006851 0.021050 0.049035 16 2 2 1 2 2 0.048883 0.009875 0.028717 0.069050 16 2 2 2 1 1 0.052581 0.008187 0.035862 0.069300 16 2 2 2 1 2 0.061398 0.005769 0.049617 0.073179 16 2 2 2 2 1 0.036643 0.004840 0.026758 0.046527 16 2 2 2 2 2 0.039733 0.004787 0.029956 0.049510 16

2.4 Movement Amplitude

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA

Caption

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Task: 1= single task, 2= dual task

Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Frequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible

(37)

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (amplitude in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1398517 1 1398517 1027.382 0.000000 22931 1 22931 16.846 0.000286

40837 30 1361

101995 1 101995 105.855 0.000000

1036 1 1036 1.075 0.308161

28906 30 964

1259 1 1259 17.613 0.000222

256 1 256 3.585 0.067985

2144 30 71

1892 1 1892 13.333 0.000985 1334 1 1334 9.401 0.004560

4257 30 142

108 1 108 1.294 0.264372

56 1 56 0.673 0.418358

2495 30 83

55 1 55 2.892 0.099374

200 1 200 10.424 0.003008

574 30 19

721 1 721 3.638 0.066084

793 1 793 4.001 0.054595

5944 30 198

2 1 2 0.078 0.781714

46 1 46 1.883 0.180198

733 30 24

336 1 336 6.537 0.015866

154 1 154 2.999 0.093567

1541 30 51

56 1 56 1.752 0.195683

54 1 54 1.699 0.202368

955 30 32

3 1 3 0.180 0.674721

3 1 3 0.197 0.660535

522 30 17

0 1 0 0.022 0.882821

75 1 75 5.010 0.032778

451 30 15

63 1 63 4.079 0.052434

39 1 39 2.569 0.119470

460 30 15

7 1 7 0.614 0.439470

1 1 1 0.099 0.754880

327 30 11

10 1 10 0.767 0.388132

2 1 2 0.144 0.706990

391 30 13

4 1 4 0.330 0.569810

13 1 13 1.150 0.292046

336 30 11

(38)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (amplitude in ERP.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p

-i -d f -d f -d p

H-F Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Low Ad

LIMB LIMB*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LC LC*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

TASK*LC TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC LIMB*TASK*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*LC*FREQ TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group Error

1 105.8548 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 3

1 1.0747 0.308161 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.308161 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 17.6129 0.000222 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000222 1.000000 1.000000 3

1 3.5850 0.067985 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.067985 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 13.3329 0.000985 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000985 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 9.4015 0.004560 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.004560 1.000000 1.000000 3

30

1 1.2937 0.264372 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.264372 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 0.6734 0.418358 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.418358 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 2.8919 0.099374 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.099374 1.000000 1.000000 3

1 10.4243 0.003008 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.003008 1.000000 1.000000 3

30

1 3.6382 0.066084 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.066084 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 4.0011 0.054595 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.054595 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.0782 0.781714 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.781714 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 1.8827 0.180198 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.180198 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 6.5370 0.015866 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.015866 1.000000 1.000000 3

1 2.9994 0.093567 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.093567 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 1.7515 0.195683 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.195683 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 1.6987 0.202368 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.202368 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.1796 0.674721 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.674721 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 0.1968 0.660535 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.660535 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.0221 0.882821 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.882821 1.000000 1.000000 3

1 5.0098 0.032778 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.032778 1.000000 1.000000 3

30

1 4.0789 0.052434 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.052434 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 2.5688 0.119470 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.119470 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.6139 0.439470 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.439470 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 0.0993 0.754880 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.754880 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.7669 0.388132 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.388132 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 0.1440 0.706990 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.706990 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

1 0.3302 0.569810 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.569810 1.000000 1.000000 3 1 1.1503 0.292046 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.292046 1.000000 1.000000 3 30

(39)

group; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=16.846, p=.00029 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

group 35

40 45 50 55 60 65 70

DV

_

1

LIMB; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=105.85, p=.00000 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LIMB 20

30 40 50 60 70 80 90

DV

_

1

(40)

TASK; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=17.613, p=.00022 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

TASK 35

40 45 50 55 60 65 70

DV

_

1

LC; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 30)=13.333, p=.00099 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LC 35

40 45 50 55 60 65 70

DV

_

1

References

Related documents

over the thermoformed sheet. To make the cut, a sheet shear has been used, according to [29]. Thermoforming of specimens for tensile tests: a) Hybrid mould; b) Thermoforming of the

In SSA Form, the fact that the interference graph is chordal yields a stronger guarantee of k -colorability than traditional coalescing methods, because merging vertices may not

At body temperature (37 o C), the gas solubilities and diffusivities are slightly higher, and thus we expect a corresponding increase in the rate of gas exchange and oxygen

The data were collected from 218 undergraduate nursing students using demographic data, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 42).The progressive muscle

LIMONE SUCCO 1987/AS ZDT-TGMS Pareve Symbol.. BB306H E.SOL.CEDRATA AURELIA 1x1250 BRL-MDCK

Eine weitere Studie konnte zeigen, dass der Defekt im PKD4-Gen in einer europäischen Kohorte von Dobermännern keine Rolle bei der Entstehung von DCM spielte und auch

We have seen in Section 2 that the current methods for constructing families of elliptic curves of prime order with prescribed embedding degree can all be subsumed under a