Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
5-1-1984
Tapestries in transition
Dana Berendt Loud
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion
in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact
.
Recommended Citation
ROCHESTER
INSTITUTE
OF
TECHNOLOGY
A
Thesis
Submitted
to theFaculty
ofThe
College
ofFine
andApplied
Arts
in
Candidacy
for
theDegree
ofMASTER
OF
FINE
ARTS
TAPESTRIES
IN
TRANSITION
By
Dana
Berendt
Loud
APPROVALS
Adviser:
Donald Bujnowski
D~:
~
)
IS
Iscd
Adviser:
Max.~
..
~e!]derr:n~n
__ .. " .
Date:
---"",J-+-;.-.:::...;.:.-."--~---Assistant to the Dean
for Graduate Affairs:
Fred Meyer
---1--Date:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~"--"'=:...Io:.:_;..._+_Dean, College of
R b
H
J
h
t
Ph D
Fine and Applied Arts:
0
ert
.
0
ns on
.
Date,
S-/)..'I
y
I,
~C4'!,~j,.. L<~~
each time a request is made.
following address.
, prefer to be contacted
I can be reached at the
Dana Loud
521 Pleasant Street
Manlius, N.Y.
13104
CONTENTS
LIST
OF
ILLUSTRATIONS
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
vINTRODUCTION
1
INFLUENCES
2
HISTORICAL APPLICATIONS
4
TECHNICAL
CONSIDERATIONS
AND
PROCESS
6
USE
OF
COLOR
10
FINISHING
12
THE
INDIVIDUAL
TAPESTRIES
Athens
13
Rome
16
Venice
20
Paris
23
STATISTICS
27
CONCLUSION
28
ENDNOTES
29
SOURCES
CONSULTED
30
LIST
OF
ILLUSTRATIONS
1
.Athens
14
2.
Athens
(Detail)
15
3.
Rome
18
4.
Rome
(Detail)
19
5
.Venice
21
6.
Venice
(Detail)
22
7
.Paris
24
8.
Paris
(Detail)
25
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
With
love
and profoundthanks
tomy
parentsfor
their
boundless
encouragement andsupport,
and tomy
childrenfor
their unshakeable confidence.Special
appreciationto
Mr.
B.
,to
Max,
andR.I.T.'s
program of"extended
INTRODUCTION
The
objective ofthis
thesis
is
to exploredrapery
andfabric
studiesthrough
the
use oftapestry
techniques.It
is
intended
that
these
portrayals willconvey
volume,
depth
and a sense of richness
through
the
use offabric
as theirsubject.
These
tapestries
willemploy
a classical approachin
an attempt to combinedrawing
andweaving
in
a unique andINFLUENCES
A
long-time
appreciationfor
historical
textiles
led
tothe
choice oftapestry
asthe
mediumfor
thisthesis.
An
early
encounter with the sumptuous tapestries ofThe
Lady
and
the
Unicorn
in
the
Musee
de
Cluny
in
Paris
made alasting
impression,
influencing
my
tastes
as well as aninterest
in
textiles,
yearsbefore my
becoming
a weaver.The
sixhuge
tapestries aredisplayed
in
ahexagonal
room,
in
whichthey
arethe
only
exhibit.Seeing
them wasto
be
surroundedby
anextraordinary
elegance,
from
whichit
was
impossible
todissociate
the remarkable achievement ofthe
weavers and their craft.The
two most pronouncedcharacteristics of these
Gothic
tapestries present achallenging
goal:"One
is
completemastery
of theircraft;
the
other precise concernfor,
and controlof,
color....Color
joins
and contourshading
arehandled
withastonishing
skill."1
The
development
ofdrawing
skillshas
had
adirect
relationship
tothe
tapestries plannedfor
this
thesis.
The
approach
has
been
a ratherliteral
one,
an effort todraw
what
I
saw.Many
hours
oflooking
and "seeing"have brought
a
better understanding
of shadow andlight
andthe
partthey
It
has
alsobecome
clearer that eventhe
most realisticrendering
of a subjectis
stillsimply
one's personalinterpretation.
Intensive
studies ofthe
masters notwithstanding,
my
personal stylehas
comefrom
within.As
drawing
work progressedthe
area ofdrapery
studiesstruck a responsive chord and
consistently
produced the mostsuccessful
drawings.
This
aspect of thedrawings
held
double
meaning
for
aTextile
major and seemed tobe
aHISTORICAL
APPLICATIONS
A
distinct
preferencefor
theGothic
tapestries,
ofthe
12th
to
16th
centuries,
leads
to adiscussion
of the changesin
tapestry,
withthe
beginning
of theRenaissance,
whichinvolved
tapestry
as painting.The
early
tapestries
weremainly
practicalin
nature,
serving
to
cover walls and provide warmth.As
their usebecame
more one ofdecoration,
the
various subjectsdepicted
could
be
religious,
historical,
scenes ofdaily
life,
andalso allegorical and
fanciful
asin
The
Lady
and theUnicorn,
The
Hunt
of theUnicorn,
andthe
many
millefleurs
tapestries
.These
tapestries
have
asimplicity
and elegancederiving
both
from
their subject and the weaver's use ofhis
craft.
In
many
cases the weaverhad
a good measure ofchoice as
he
workedfrom
the cartoonist'sdiagram,
and muchof the
background
detail
and methods ofshading
wereleft
up
2
to
him.
As
new standards oftaste
evolvedin
theRenaissance,
tapestry
makers wereinfluenced
as well."From
being
afree
and creative
art,
asin
its
greatGothic
days,
tapestry-making
sank to the rankfirst
of aninterpretative,
andthen
of animitative
art....But
from
the
time ofthe
changeof
copying
more and morefaithfully
the accents andmodulations of painting."
It
was not untilthe
20th
century,
and the work ofJean
Lurcat
in
France,
that
the
weaver againbecame
both
artistand craftsman.
In
adirect
responseto
this
historical
research,
thetapestries
presentedhere
are the result ofdrawings
specifically
designed
as cartoonsfor
tapestries,
yet at thesame
time
arestrongly
influenced
by
a personaldrawing
style.
It
is
interesting
that
eachhas
influenced
theother.
In
designing
atapestry
the weaver must work withthe ever-present vertical
warp
andhorizontal
weft.The
subject
here
is
in
direct
contrast,
however,
withthe
fluidity
andcurves,
the
fullness
anddepth
whichdraped
fabric
possesses.To
resolve this contradiction adrawing
style evolved which portrayed these
flowing
aspects throughstraight
lines.
The
drawing
andshading
lines
correspond tothe
horizontal
weftlines.
This
method combinedbasic
elements ofweaving
anddrawing.
A
means ofblending
colors to produce a new coloror
shading
in
weaving
is
called "hatching," and a means ofrepresenting
shadow andlight
in
drawing
is
called"cross-hatching."
Drawing
the
shading
lines
with verticalstraight
lines,
eliminating
the
"cross"from
cross-hatching
closely
approximatesthe
weaving
processthat
takes
place onIt
has
been
the
intent
here
to preservethe
drawing-weaving
lines
so that thetapestries
willlook
handwoven.
Barbara
Bertram,
in
A
History
ofTapestry,
states,
"Designing
for
tapestry
canonly
be
satisfactorily
carriedout
by
someone who understands the technique oftapestry
weaving.
The
appearance of thefinished
product shouldbe
TECHNICAL
CONSIDERATIONS
AND
PROCESS
Compared
to
other methods ofweaving,
tapestry
entailsthe closest
involvement
ofthe
weaver.This
"weaver-controlled"
approach
involves
putting
in
the
colorsby
hand,
often
changing
a single strand to achieve gradual shading.Certain
technical
aspects ofthe
weaving
of thesetapestries
areworthy
of mentionfor
their effect onthe
general appearance of the pieces.
Each
tapestry
wasbegun
and ended with plainweave,
toprovide a
hem
fabric
thinner than the mainbody
of thetapestry.
Though
theinstallation
of aheddle
rod andpick-up
stick wasnecessary
to achievethis,
the end resultwas well worth the extra time and effort required
to
setup
and
to
weavethe
hems
.To
preserve as consistent a width aspossible,
thewarp
was
kept
very
tight,
there was generousbubbling
ofthe
weftyarns,
andthe
width was measuredregularly
to monitor andmaintain
it.
The
weaving
was carried out all theway
across each rowrather than
building
up
individual
areas.This
enabledthe
use of
the
beater
during
the
entire piece to ensure afirm,
even
beat
and maintainthe
straightlines
in
the
horizontal
weft.
This
was alsonecessary
with somany
interconnected
All
ofthese
tapestries
were woven sideways on theloom.
This
wasdetermined
by
the
fact
that
there
were morevertical
lines
in
each piecethan
horizontal,
andit
is
easier
to
create a smoothline
horizontally
or at a slightangle
than
tobuild
it
vertically.A
primary
raisond'etre
ofthese
pieces wasto
presentthe
curves andflow
ofdraped
fabric.
The
challenge of thecontrol of
these
curveshad
to
be
accomplished through thenatural "stepping" effect created as the
horizontal
colorjoins
were made and movedfrom
one verticalwarp
thread tothe
next.In
effect,
theillusion
of curves was createdrather
than
atruly
curvedline.
This
took extreme care andprecision,
as well as the use of afew
tricks.
Experiments
showed
that
certain systems couldbuild
a rather good curvewhen conditions were right.
This
mightinvolve
as minute adetail
as whether awarp
thread was raised orlowered
whenthe
weft passed aroundit,
orhow many
threadsto
move overas an angle was
built.
Sometimes
it
was possible to "pad" ajoin
with asupplementary
weft threadto
help
achievethe
desired
angle.When
an angle was ofnecessity
severely
stepped,
the normalsewing
up
ofthe
resulting
slits couldbe
done
in
such away
asto
soften the stepsinto
a gentlercurve.
This
wasonly necessary
in
afew
areas ontwo
ofthe
pieces.
All
the other slits were sewnfrom
the
back
ofthe
tapestry,
so the curves appearjust
asthey
were woven.Along
with thesefocal
points ofhard-edged
lines
andThere
was a contrastin
theworking
of these areas: thetight
control ofthe
curves andthe
almostarbitrary
orrandom
hatching
ofthe
shaded areas created aworking
rhythm,
moving
from
concentration to relaxationin
each row.Certain
areas weredictated,
others coulddevelop
with morefreedom.
In
contrast to thedrawing
processin
whichany
areacould
be
worked on and altered as the whole piecedeveloped,
once well past a specific area of a
tapestry
it
wasvirtually
impossible
to
changeit.
To
make one smallimprovement
couldinvolve
unweaving
many
days'work.
Therefore
it
was essential tostep
back many
times to assurethat
thedesired
effect wasbeing
created and to seeif
immediate
changes were needed as theweaving
proceeded.The
distinctive
look
oftapestry
when viewed as afait
accompli
is
intriguing
in
its
texture andparticularly
withrespect to the placement of color.
While
in
fact
it
may
have
been
carefully
planned orinstinctive
orimpulsive,
there
is
afinality
that
gives noindication
ofthe
deliberation
or emotion that mighthave
taken place.Laya
Brostoff
comments onthis
aspect oftapestry,
"A brushstroke
made
slowly
is
entirely
different
from
one made quickly.A
pick
laid
in
slowly
simply
takes
moretime,
but
assuming
that the technique
is
adequate,
looks
nodifferent
than
apick entered
10
USE
OF
COLOR
Color
cannothelp
but
play
animportant
part as atapestry
is
translated
from
paper to yarn.In
adrawing
animage
canfade
in
andout,
andthe
paper plays a significantrole.
In
making
atapestry,
thetextured
surfaceis
createdby
the
processitself,
asyarn,
and thereforecolor,
is
applied
to
100
percent of the work.It
was notthe
specificintention
for
the
pieces tohave
this
in
common,
yet therehas
been
a consistent andsomewhat unusual approach to color.
The
first
three pieceshave
darkly
colored,
thoughdifferent
kinds
ofbackgrounds.
The
treatment of thedrapery
in
all ofthem
has,
in
effect,
been
monochromatic.Although
the
idea
ofdepicting
decorated
or patternedfabric
wasoriginally
apossibility,
the
involvement
withrendering
the configurations of thecloth
itself
assumed moreimportance
at thistime.
Working
with
many
shades and valuesfrom
light
todark,
andconstantly
changing
these
for
effect,
made each pickfull
of"color"
decisions.
The
fourth
tapestry
used a scalefrom
thelightest
grey
to
deep
black,
which wascertainly
adeparture
from
convention.
Some
would regardthis
asthe
absence ofcolor,
but
here
it
was considered asthe
othershad
been,
a range11
related
the
tapestry
closely
both
to
the graphitedrawing,
and theidea
of statuesfrom
which the pieceis
derived.
In
striving
for
richness anddepth,
combinations of12
FINISHING
Final
presentation ofthe
tapestries
was animportant
consideration.
Ideally
atapestry
shouldhang freely
in
theproper setting.
Because
oftheir
small size some method wasnecessary
to setthem
off,
but
conventionalframing
would notbe
appropriate withthe
tactile
aspect of tapestry.Each
piece was stretched over a1/8
inch
piece ofplexiglas
into
which4
holes
had
been
drilled
andfour
screws set.
Cloth
tape
was sewn on theback
ofeach,
1/8
inch
from
the selvedges.Heavy
duty
carpet thread was usedto
lash
these tapes at1/2
inch
intervals
from
top
tobottom
across
the
back,
andthen
tolash
the wovenhems
acrossfrom
side to side.
This
provide avery
secure and compact meansof
stretching
andblocking
thetapestry,
and servedto
square the edges perfectly.
The
stretchedtapestry
was then mounted on afabric-covered plywood panel which
had
corresponding
holes
drilled
so
that
the panel couldbe
attachedto
thetapestry
from
the
back.
Four
smallbumpers
on theback
assuredthat
the piecewould
be
slightly
removedfrom
the wall yethang
completely
flat.
The
finished
appearance,
in
keeping
withboth
the
medium of the work and
the
subject,
wassimple,
straightfor13
THE
INDIVIDUAL TAPESTRIES
Athens
The
first
study
originatedfrom drawings
made offabric
from
Greece
that
had
been
repeatedly
draped
untilit
was"casually"
positioned so as to create graceful curves and
folds,
afeeling
ofdepth,
and to cast a shadow.An
original attempt
to
render the patternsin
the
stripe wasnot
successful,
so the stripe was represented as plainthough
it
changedin
value asit
passedin
and out of shadowand
light.
With
both
thefabric
and thebackground
renderedin
basically
coolcolors,
adeep
red wasinterspersed
randomly
within
the
blue background
tointroduce
warmth and richness.Though
the
fabric
is
stationary,
there
is
definite
movement and
flow
to
the
design
as the eyefollows
along
the
edge of
the
cloth and underit
into
the
deepest
shadow.For
such a small piece
it
readssurprisingly
wellfrom
adistance.
With
16
ends perinch
in
the
warp
it
was possibleto
create
believable
curves,
which was animportant
objective14
15
16
Rome
Arriving
atthe
cartoon andworking
drawing
for
this
tapestry
was a complicated process.The
initial
idea
camefrom
the
draped
fabric
on the statue ofthe
Apollo
Belvedere
in
the
Vatican
Museum.
Efforts
toduplicate
thedrape
andfall
of thisfabric
met withdifficulty.
An
important
discovery
wasthat
the cloth mustfirst
be
cutinto
acircular shape
for
the
edgefolds
to turn over asdesired.
Eventually,
though,
thefabric
had
tobe
manipulated andtied
back
to
achieve a similarconfiguration,
with theimportant
negative space.Although
actualfabric
would notconform to what
had
been
carvedin
stone,
asatisfactory
gestural
image
wasfinally
achieved.The
focal
point of this workis
thelower
right quarterwhere the most
intricate
folds
curveback
andforth
in
thehighest
contrast oflight
and shade.The
rest ofthe
fabric
radiates
away
from
this areainto
a more overalllightness,
with reflected
light
coming
into
play,
before
reaching
another area of contrast
in
the
upperleft.
The
execution ofthis
piece wasextremely
time-consuming, again
using
16
ends perinch,
and thecapability
of
fine
curves.Working
across a rowthe
weaver wouldencounter a myriad of events
taking
place as areas entered17
and
the
background.
It
was somewhatlike
conducting
anorchestra
to
keep
track
andbe
aware ofthe
ever-changing
requirements at each point.
The
background
wasdesigned
to contrast withbut
notcompete with
the
fabric.
It
reveals a subtle geometricpattern
only
to
the
viewer who comes withinvery
close18
19
20
Venice
The
subject of this piece wasderived
from
a scarf,purchased on the
Rialto,
whichhad
been
folded
into
atriangle
andthen
the cornersknotted.
It
was placedin
direct
light
on a rug.The
drawing
did
have
avitality
andcharacter which was a challenge to translate
into
tapestry,
though
it
seemed suitable.The
central area ofinterest
worked wellin
terms
ofachieving
the
folds
and curves asthey
emanatedfrom
the
knot.
A
20/2
perle cotton was used tobring
outthe
highlights
and provide a measure of sheento
indicate
asilky
fabric
juxtaposed
withthe
texturedbackground.
It
was
necessary
to use a more organic and primitive approachto the actual
knotted
section sincemany
details
took placein
anextremely
small area.The
upperleft
area posed the problem ofhaving
severaldesign
lines
which came on or close to the verticalwarp
asthe piece was woven.
Though
naturalin
the
composition,
it
resulted
in
thoselines
being
severely
angular comparedto
the other contours.
Judicious
sewing
together
ofthose
slits produced a smoothness compatible with
the
rest ofthe
22
23
Paris
The
final
tapestry,
incorporating
a number of newdevelopments
in
thedesigning,
was abolder
expression ofthe
theme,
andthe
probabledirection
for
future
works.Instead
ofhaving
afigure
andground,
the entire pictureplane was
taken
up
withfabric,
although thepipey
folds
at thebottom
set offthe
many
layers
above.The
robes ofthe
Gothic
sculptures onmany
ofthe
French
cathedralsinfluenced
the content of this piece.However
theStatue
ofLiberty
provided the mainsource,
though
it
was subjectedto
reproportioning.When
none ofthe
various color schemes attemptedhad
the
sameimpact
as theinitial
graphitedrawing,
the
decision
was made to weave thetapestry
in
shades of grey.The
weaving
ofthis
tapestry
was theleast
problematical of
the
four
works.This
had
partly
to
do
withthe
design
being
compatible with theprocess,
withusing
12
ends [image:29.546.57.492.159.595.2]24
25
26
STATISTICS
27
Athens
Sett:
16
e.p.i.Warp:
8/4
cotton carpetwarp
Weft:
Wool,
silkFinished
size--width:
11
1/2"height:
8
3/4"Framed;
19
1/8"17
3/8"Rome
Sett:
16
e.p.i.Warp:
Seine
cottonWeft:
Wool,
20/2
perle cottonFinished
size--width: 18"
height:
17
5/8"Framed;
24"23
7/8'Venice
Sett
Warp
Weft
12
e.p.i.Seine
cottonWool,
20/2
perle cottonFinished
size width: 12"height:
18
1/4"Framed;
17
3/4"24
5/8"Paris
Sett:
12
e.p.i.Warp:
Seine
cottonWeft:
Wool
Finished
size--width:
17
1/4"height:
19
1/2"Framed:
25
1/8"28
CONCLUSION
Of
practical concern wasthe
creation of suitableimages
to
carry
out the objectives of thethesis,
and thedevelopment
oftechniques
tobring
about their realization.More
intangibly,
it
washoped
thatthey
would present anapproach
different
from
mosttapestry
seentoday,
yet at thesame
time
retain alink
with the past.As
abody
of work thereis
definitely
an unpredictedindividuality
andoriginality
in
the style of the works.The
choice of subjecthas
provokedgratifying
interest
andnumerous reactions to
this
play
on yarns(if
not on words).Most
important,
they
do
seem tocarry
anunderlying
reference
to
the elegance and character of theearly
courtly
tapestries that
have been
such aninfluence.
There
were times when thevalidity
of the project wasquestioned
by
theweaver,
but
admittedly
this
wasin
the
uncertain
beginning,
with the obstacles still tobe
surmounted.
The
confidence andmastery
gained whileweaving
at
the
tapestry
loom
for
many
monthshave
only
served toreinforce
the
lure
oftapestry
as an artform,
givenmany
insights
as toits
endurance throughout an extensive29
ENDNOTES
Pierre
Verlet
etal.,
The
Book
ofTapestry
(New
York:
The
Vendome
Press,
1978),
p.32.
2
Margaret
B.
Freeman,
The
Unicorn Tapestries
(New
York:
The
Metropolitan
Museum
ofArt,
1976),
p.208.
3
Verlet,
The
Book
ofTapestry,
pp.62-3.
4
Maurice
Pianzola
andJulien
Coffinet,
Tapestry
(Geneva:
Les
Editions
de
Bonvent,
1971),
pp.110-111.
Barbara
Bertram,
A
History
ofTapestry
(Mclntyre
Visual
Publications,
1975),
p.3.
Laya
Brostoff,
Weaving
aTapestry
(Loveland,
CO:
Interweave
Press,
1982),
p.2.
Anni
Albers
,On
Designing
(Middletown,
CT:
Wesleyan
30
SOURCES
CONSULTED
Albers,
Anni.
On
Designing.
Middletown,
CT:
WesleyanUniversity
Press,
1961.
Albers,
Anni.
On
Weaving.
Middletown,
CT:
Wesleyan
University
Press
,1965.
Bertram,
Barbara,
ed.A
History
ofTapestry.
Mclntyre
Visual
Publications,
1975.
Brostoff,
Laya.
Weaving
aTapestry.
Loveland,
CO:
Interweave
Press^
1982.
Freeman,
Margaret
B.
The
Unicorn
Tapestries.
New
York:
The Metropolitan Museum
ofArt,
1976.
Lurcat,
Jean.
Designing
Tapestry.
London:
Rockliff
Publishing
Corporation,
1950.
Pianzola,
Maurice,
andCoffinet,
Julien.
Tapestry.
Geneva:
Les
Editions
de
Bonvent,
1971.
Rhead,
Woolliscroft
G.
The
Treatment
ofDrapery
in
Art.
London:
George
Bell
andSons,
1904
.Scottish
Arts
Council,
Master
Weavers
,Tapestry
from
the
Dovecot
Studios,
1912-1980.
Edinburgh,
Canongate
Publishing
Ltd.,
1980.
Thomson,
Francis
Paul.
Tapestry,
Mirror
ofHistory.
New
York:
Crown
Publishers,
1980.
Tidball,
Harriet.
Contemporary
Tapestry,
Santa
Anna,
CA:
Shuttle
Craft
Build,
1964.
Verlet,
Pierre;
Florisoone,
Michel;
Hoffmeister,
Adolf;
31
AFTERWORD
But
mostimportant
to
one's own growthis
tosee oneself
leave
the safe ground of acceptedconventions and
to
find
oneself alone andself-dependent.
It
is
an adventure which canpermeate one's whole
being.
Self-confidence
cangrow.
And
alonging
for
excitement canbe
satisfied without external
means,
within oneself;for
creating
is
the mostintense
excitement onecan come to
know.
7
puj/joivry^l
Thesis
Proposal
for
the
Master
ofFine
Arts
Degree
College
ofFine
andApplied
Arts
Rochester
Institute
ofTechnology
Title:
Tapestries
in
Transition
Submlttted
by:
Dana
Berendt
Loud
Thesis
Committee:
Chief
Advisers:1.
Donald
Bujnowski
fa-^LJ&y***"^Wy'K
2.
Max
Lend.eTmanyfc^^^a^ffc&u
fd/sr/rj
i >
Departmental
Approval: . /// ./
Date:
, ,.iy//.#fV
"/"IK
Approval,
Assistant
to
the
Dean
for
Graduate
Affairs;Date:
Final
Committee
Decision:
In
this
thesisI
intend
to
produce a series of tapestriesusing
the
uprierhttapestry
loon
and/orthe
multi-harness loom.The
work will bethe
result of researchinto
specifictapestry
traditions.
Through
various transitions and adaptations bothin
design
andcolor,
I
will proceedto
use these traditionsin