SEDIMENTOLOGY AND DIAGENESIS OF
LATE PALAEOPROTEROZOIC
CARBONATES, SOUTHERN McARTHUR
BASIN, NORTHERN AUSTRALIA
Peter R. Winefield (MSc. Hons)
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy (Geology) University of Tasmania
(May, 1999)
THESIS STATEMENT
This thesis contains the results of four years research undertaken at the Centre for Ore
Deposit Research, University of Tasmania, between March 1997 and April, 1999. The
author states that this thesis contains no material that has been accepted for the award of
any other higher degree or graduate diploma in any tertiary institution, and to the best of
the author's knowledge and belief, it does not contain any material previously published or
written by another person except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis.
This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the
Copyright Act (1968).
~.A~
Peter R.
wi;;~Keici
Dated: l';l .S. <1."{ •
DISTRIBUTION LIST
1. University Copy
2. University Copy
3. Dr Stuart Bull
4. Dr Peter McGoldrick
5. Peter Winefield
6. AMIRA (unbound)
7. Unbound Original
ABSTRACT
The late Palaeoproterozoic (Statherian) McArthur Group comprises a thick ( ~ 5
km) sequence of platformal stromatolitic dolostone and clastic sediment with local pyritic,
carbonaceous siltstone units. Exposure of the McArthur Group is largely confined to the
elongate, - N-S trending Batten Fault Zone, southern McArthur Basin. The Barney Creek
Formation and Reward Dolomite in particular, are characterised by rapid thickness
changes that reflect the onset of a phase of tectonically controlled subsidence. Detailed
study of the 1ciddle McArthur Group sequence that includes these units has recognised
three distinct depositional sequences, each of which provides important insights into the
prevailing basin architecture and palaeoenvironmental conditions during sedimentation.
The Emmerugga Depositional Sequence (EDS) represents a phase of increasing
accommodation (from Myrtle Shale to Emmerugga Dolomite) during which carbonate
platform lithofacies accumulated in a series of shallowing-upward cycles that thicken and
deepen upsection. An abrupt basinward shift in lithofacies at the top of the EDS marks
the onset of tectonically-induced basin subsidence recorded by the deposition of the
Barney Creek Depositional Sequence (BCDS). The BCDS comprises the Teena Dolomite,
Barney Creek Formation and Reward Dolomite, and is characterised by rapid lateral
lithofacies variation and the development of numerous sub-basins adjacent to pre-existing
major -N-S trending structures (i.e. Emu, Tawallah and Hot Spring Faults).
Facies architecture within the BCDS demonstrates that the thickest sections of
Basinal lithofacies (or depocentre maxima) occur adjacent to NNW-NW trending
segments of the major fault systems, while condensed BCDS sections developed adjacent
to NNE-NE segments. This facies architecture is consistent with differential strike-slip
movement along sinuous ~N-S faults resulting in the formation of transtensional (or
releasing bend) basins adjacent to NNW-NW fault segments, while 'transpressive'
sub-basins or BCDS platform margins developed along NNE-NE trending fault sections.
Adjacent to sub-basin margins, gravitationally unstable slopes were formed that are
characterised by coarse-grained clastic Slope lithofacies and abundant slope-related
synsedimentary deformation. This caused the development of neptunian dykes;
liquefaction breccias, megabreccias and soft-sediment intrafolial folds.
The initial stages of BCDS deposition were characterised by abundant submarine
cementation, including the widespread precipitation of radiating fan-like seafloor cements
(or Coxco needles). Coxco fan-like cements are recognised throughout a number of
lithofacies and are interpreted to be associated with the upwelling of anoxic, HC03
Abstract 1V
in the bathymetry of the basin during the onset of differential subsidence. Isotopic analysis
of the basal BCDS sequence records a negative excursion in 013
C values that is consistent
with the interpretation of upwelling of anoxic bottom water and the widespread
precipitation of carbonate.
The Lynott Depositional Sequence (IDS) overlies the BCDS and is interpreted to
represent a phase of renewed basin subsidence. The spatial distribution of the LDS
lithofacies is distinctly different to that of the BCDS, suggesting a subtle but important
shift in the controlling structures on LDS deposition.
Diagenesis of the middle McArthur Group ts dominated by abundant
synsedimentary cements and precipitates which include: fibrous dolomite cements; micritic
cements; fan-like seafloor cements; and spheroidal dolomite. Depositional components
and early synsedimentary cements are exclusively preserved as dolomite, with average 013C
and 0180
values ranging from O%o to -2%o PDB and -4%o to -10%o PDB respectively.
Textural relationships and excellent fabric preservation support early dolomitisation of the
sequence. Pervasive dolomitisation of dully luminescent depositional and early diagenetic
components must have occurred relatively early during diagenesis, as overlying
burial-related dolospar cements are zoned under cathodoluminescence, indicating that they
precipitated as primary dolomite.
Widespread synsedimentary cementation of the middle McArthur Group
~·.
effectively controlled the pattern of later diagenesis. Primary porosity is commonly
rimmed by several generations of fibrous dolomite cement, with only a relatively minor
component of post-depositional dolospar cement occluding porosity. The petrography
and geochemistry of dolospar cements is consistent with a burial origin with 0180, and to a
lesser extent 013C, showing a trend toward lighter values. Several distinct dolospar
generations are recognised that form a regionally recognisable pattern (Do1~Do2~Do3)
reflecting progressive burial of the middle McArthur Group sequence. The development
of a burial cement stratigraphy allows some constraints to be placed on the timing of
discordant MVT -style sulphide precipitation and hydrocarbon migration. Base-metal
sulphides commonly directly overlie brightly luminescent dolospar (Do2b), while bitumen
post-dates Do2b. Considerations of the burial history of the middle McArthur Group
sequence indicate that the onset of hydrocarbon migration most likely occurred prior to
maximum burial (-3 km) of the sequence (-1600 Ma). This suggests that precipitation of
pre-bitumen dolospar cements (i.e. Dot, Do2a.& Do2b) and sulphides probably occurred
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am greatly indebted to my supervisors, Stuart Bull, David Selley, Peter
McGoldrick and Malcolm Wallace for their encouragement, patience, direction and
friendship over the course of this project. I would also like to extend my gratitude to the
staff at the Centre for Ore Deposit Research (CODES) and the Geology Department for
their assistance and advice at various stages, especially to Ross Large, Clive Burrett, Ron
Berry, Dave Cooke and Garry Davidson. Thanks also to June Pongratz for her help in
numerous printing and drafting problems, to David Steele for his guidance and tolerance
concerning the Electron Microprobe, and to Christine Cook for fast-tracking the last
batch of isotopic analyses. Special mention is also made of the assistance given by Peter
Cornish, Simon Stephens, Christine Higgins, Keith Harris, Michael Blake, Marilyn Feast,
Nilar Hlaing, Katie McGoldrick, Moya Kilapatrick, Di Steffens, Jessica Tyler and Kathi
Stait. Thanks also to Debbie Harding for drafting of various maps and figures.
I have been particularly fortunate to have been involved in an industry-supported
research project and am extremely grateful for the help and encouragement that I .have
received from several geologists, especially Mark Hinman (formerly MIMEX), Peter
Muhling (BHP), John Warren
GK
Resources), Steve Abbott (NTGS), Peter Beiers(NTGS), Barry Piestch (NTGS), Malcolm Walter (Macquarie University), Jim Jackson
(AGSO), Peter Southgate (AGSO) and Deb Scott (AGSO). I am also grateful for logistical
support provided by the NTGS, and to Damien Nihill and the McArthur River Mine for
providing accommodation and assistance during the latter part of the 1997 field season.
Special thanks go to the landowners and station managers of Balbirini, Bauhinia
Downs, McArthur River and Mallapunyah Stations for allowing access to their properties.
In particular I would like to also thank John Mora for his hospitality and friendship during
three enjoyable field seasons spent in the McArthur River region. It would also be remiss
of me to not mention the staff and management of the Cape Crawford Roadhouse (aka
Heartbreak Hotel) whose hospitality and help was much appreciated.
Many thanks to my fellow PhD colleagues for their companionship and the
distractions, especially David (Rowdy) Rawlings, Steve Hunns, Mark Duffett, Tony
Webster, Holger Paulick, and Phisit (Meng) Umtakum.
I would also like to extend my gratitude to Helen White, and the Burgess and
Robbins families for their friendship and support during the last few years. Lastly, I would
like to thank my parents and especially my wife Annabel and daughter Jessica. Hopefully, I
can now begin to repay the love, patience and support you have shown me through these
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE ... i
STATEMENT ... ii
ABSTRACT ... iii
ACKN"OWLEDGEMENTS ... v
TABLE OF CONTENTS ... vi
LIST OF FIGURES ... x
LIST 0 F TABLES ... xii
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ... xili PREFACE ... XV 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction ... 1
1.2 Research aims ... 2
1.3 I..ocation & physiography ... 2
1.4 Previous work & concurrent studies ... 4
1.5 Methodology ... 5
2. REGIONAL GEOLOGICAL SETIING 2.1 Introduction ... 7
2.2 Tectonic architecture ... 7
2.3 Regional stratigraphy ... 7
2.3.1 Tawallah Group ... 10
2.3 .2 McArthur Group ... 1 0 2.3.3 Nathan Group ... 12
2.3.4 Roper Group ... 12
2.4 Structural setting ... 12
2.5 Geology of selected areas ... 15
2.5. 1 Gotge Prospect ... 15
2.5.2 Top Crossing/ Leila Creek Area ... 18
2.5.3 McArthur River Area ... 20
2.5.4 Weirk Waterhole, Balbirini Station ... 26
2.5.5 Four Mile Lagoon, Billengarrah Station ... 26
2.5.6 Mt. Young area ... 26
2.5.7 Gfyde Sub-basin ... 26
3. LITHOFACIES & FACIES ASSOCIATIONS 3.1 Introduction ... 27
3.2 Continental facies association ... 29
3.2.1 Sheet conglomerate ... 29
3.3 Peritidal facies association ... 32
3.3.1 Cauf#lower chert dololutite ... 32
3.3.2 Undulatory domal microbia!ite ... 35
3.3.3 Coxco needles &peritidal microbia!ite ... 36
3.3.4 Do/arenite & dololutite with halite casts ... 36
3.3.5 Dolomitic sandstone ... 37
3.3.6 Microdigitate microbialite ... 39
3.4 Shallow-Subtidal facies association ... 39
3.4.1 Flat pebble conglomerate ... 39
3.4.2 Ooidgrainstone ... 43
Table of contents vii
3.4.4 Peloidal grainstone ... 44
3.4.5 Linked & unlinked domal microbialite ... .46
3.5 Deep-Subtidal facies association ... .46
3.5.1 Plumose microbialite & Coxco needles ... ..46
3.5.2 Planar laminated dololutite & Coxco needles ... ..49
3.5.3 Columnar conical microbialite ... 50
3.5.4 'Wormy'-textured dolostone ... 52
3.5.5 Carbonaceous flake dololutite ... 53
3.6 Platform-Margin facies association ... 54
3.6.1 Wa~ microbialite ... 54
3.7 Slope facies association , ... 55
3.7.1 Clast-supported dolorudite & dolarenite ... 55
3.7.2 Thick bedded dolorudite & dolarenite ... 58
3.7.3 Megabreccia ... 59
3.7.4 O!igomictic breccia ... 59
3.8 Basinal facies association ... 60
3.8.1 Dolomitic siltstone ... 60
3.8.2 Thinfy bedded, fine dolomitic sandstone & siltstone ... 63
3.8.3 Massive carbonaceous :1: pyritic shale ... 64
3.8.4 Nodular argillaceous dolostone ... 64
3.9 Synthesis ... 65
4. THE DEVELOPMENT OF LATE PALAEOPROTEROZOIC SEAFLOOR CEMENTS 4.1 Introduction ... 67
4.2 Stratigraphic setting ... 70
4.3 Coxco needle lithofacies & depositional relationships ... 72
4.4 Morphology & petrographic description ... 76
4.5 Geochemistry ... 78
4.6 Discussion ... 81
4. 6. 1 Other Northern Australian examples rf Coxco fans ... 84
4.7 Significance of an aragonitic precursor ... 84
4.8 Conclusions ... 87
5. SYNSEDIMENTARY DEFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH SLOPE DEVELOPMENT 5.1 Introduction ... 89
5.2 Neptunian dykes ... 91
5.2.1 Introduction ... 91
5.2.2 Neptunian tfykes- southern McArthur Basin ... 92
5.2.3 Itifill & geometry ... 94
5.2.4 Neptunian tfykeformation ... 97
5.2.5 Discussion ... 1 00 5.3 Matrix-rich breccia ... 102
5.4 Megabreccia ... 105
5.4.1 Megabreccia- Gorge Pro.pea ... 106
5.4.2 Origin & tran.port ... 108
5.5 Intrafolial soft-sediment folding ... 109
5.6 Summary ... 111
6. FACIES ARCHITECI'URE & STRATIGRAPHY 6.1 Introduction ... 114
6.2 Facies associations ... 116
Table of contents viii
6.3.1 R.egional Stratigrapf?y ... 116
6.3.2 Discussion ... 116
6.4 Emmerugga Depositional Sequence (EDS) ... 120
6.4.1 Facies architecture ... 120
6.4.2 Discussion qf the depositional rystem ... 122
6.5 Barney Creek Depositional Sequence (BCDS) ... 127
6.5.1 Facies architecture ... 127
6.5.2 Discussion qf the depositional rystem ... 140
6.6 Lynott Depositional Sequence (LDS) ... 142
6.7 Structural controls on BCDS deposition ... 143
6.7.1 Models for BCDS Sub-basin development ... 143
6. 7.2 Discussion ... 146
6.8 Summary ... : ... 152
7. SYNSEDIMENTARY CEMENTATION & EARLY DIAGENESIS 7.1 Inttoduction ... 153
7.2 Carbonate mineralogy ... 153
7.3 Depositional components ... 154
7.3.1 Ooids ... 154
7.3.2 Oncoids ... 156
7.3.3 Intraclasts ... 156
7.3.4 Peloids ... 157
7.3.5 Micrite ... 157
7.3.6 Internal sediment ... 157
7.3.7 Microbialites ... 158
7.4 Synsedimentary cements & precipitates ... 158
7.4.1 Fibrous dolomite cements ... 158
7.4.2 Prismatic dolomite cement ... 163
7.4.3 Secif!oorfan-like cements (Coxco needles) ... 165
7.4.4 Microcrystalline carbonate ... 165
7.4.5 Micrite cement ... 166
7. 4. 6 S talactitic-like encrustations ... 168
7.4.7 Spheroidal dolomite ... 168
7.4.8 Nodulardolomite ... 170
7.5 Geochemistry ... 174
7.5.1
0
13 C &9
8 0 isotupes ... 17 4 7.5.2 Elemental data ... 17 4 7.6 Discussion ... 1787.6.1 Original mineralogy & dolomitisation ... 178
7. 6.2 Stromatolitic microfobrics ... : ... 179
7. 6.3 Temporal significance ... 182
7.7 Summary ... 184
8. BURIAL DIAGENESIS 8.1 Inttoduction ... 185
8.2 Dolomite cements ... 187
8.2.1 Inclusion-rich prismatic dolomite cement (Do1) ... 187
8.2.2 Inclusion-poor dolospar cement (Do2) ... 190
8.2.3 Inclusion-rich, coarre!J crystalline dolospar (Do3) ... 190
8.2.4 Timing and origin qf dolospar cements ... 192
8.2.5 R.egional cement correlation ... 19 5 8.3 Hydrocarbons ... 195
8.4 Sulphides ... 199
Table of contents ix
8.6 Silicification ... 202
8.7 Feldspar alteration ... 203
8.8 Fe-rich carbonate ... 205
8.9 Summary ... 205
9. C-ISOTOPE STRATIGRAPHY 9.1 Introduction ... 209
9.2 Stratigraphic setting ... 211
9.3 Methodology ... 212
9.4 Diagenesis & petrography ... 213
9.5 Results ... 213
9.6 Trangression, carbonate precipitation & 013 C ... 215
9.7 Summary & further work ... 216
10. CONCLUSIONS 10.1 Sedimentology ... 218
10.2 Diagenesis & geochernistry ... 220
10.3 Future research ... 221
REFERENCES ... 223
APPENDICES A1 Sample catalogue ... 239
A2 Analytical data A2a Elemental results ... 245
A2b Isotope results ... 250
A2c XRD results ... 255
A3 Stratigraphic sections & drillcore ... 258 .
A3a Gorge Prospect*
A3b Top Crossing/Leila Creek* A3c Beryqya Prospect/Boko Sub-basin* A3d Amelia Sub-basin*
A3e Lynott West/ Teena area* A3f McArthur River area* A3g Mt Young area*
A3h western & southern Batten Fault Zone*
SUPPORTING PUBLICATIONS
*WINEFIEID, P.R AND McGoLDRICK, P., 1998. Evidence of Proterozoic primary CaC03 precipitation from the McArthur Group of northern
Australia: Water-Rock Interaction Conference Proceedings, WRI-9, p. 373-376.