Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
5-1-1980
Aesthetics for a working environment
Gail Fredell Smith
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion
in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact
.
Recommended Citation
Rochester
Institute
ofTechnology
A Thesis
Submitted to
the
Faculty
ofThe
College
ofFine
andApplied
Arts
in
Candidacy
for
the
Degree
ofMaster
ofFine
ArtsAesthetics
for
aWorking
Environment
By
Gail
Fredell
Smith
Advisor:
APPR
0VtlT
'
-:;
- - - -
.' ._
.
-
.'-- -'-"'-_
..- - - - _
. _ - - -
.
_.
_
.
_._- -- - - -
--
-_
..A
s s o c i a t e
A~v i s o r :Associate Advisor:
----_._--_
..-
--~ -_
.
-
_
.._.
,,-
...Datp:
Associ
Rte
Aflvisor:
;)
?'
.t e :
- - - -
- - _
..._
--
--_
.
_._---- _._---- _._---- _._---- _._---- _._---- _._---- _._---- _._---- _._---- _._---- _._---- _._---- _._----
--Gr
aduate
AC8nemi~Counc
il
p.e
presentat j
v
8:
De
PD,
~0~legpof
F
ine
&
A
pp1ied
Art
a :---_
...-
-
_
. _
---
-
-
- - -
-
-
_
.
-_
..
'
- -
'-
"
-APPR
0VtlT
'-:;
Date:
I,
,
h
pr e by
gr8~ tpermi
sGion
to
t
h e
Va
l lp c e
Me~0r i 8lL
ibrary,
of
R.T.~.,to
re p ro ~ u c8CONTENTS
THESIS
PROPOSAL
i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ii
Chapter
I.
INTRODUCTION
1
II.
PROCESSES
AND
ELEMENTS
OF
DESIGN
3
III.
MY
WORKING
ENVIRONMENT12
IV.
NOTES
ON
THE INDIVIDUAL
PROJECTS
17
Introduction
Interior Entrance
Door
Conference
Table
Four Chairs
Coat
Rack
Flat
Pile
V.
CONCLUSION
40
VI.
FOOTNOTES
41
ILLUSTRATIONS
I
.INTERIOR ENTRANCE
DOOR
21
,
22
II
.CONFERENCE
TABLE
27
III.
FOUR ARMCHAIRS
30,
31
IV.
COAT
RACK
35
The
purpose ofmy thesis
is
to
formalize
aphilosophy
ofaesthetics,
andto
expressthat
philosophy
through
several pieces offurniture
for
my
business
office.Study
of aesthetics andthe
creative processwill
form the
basis
for
the
writtenthesis.
I
willdiscuss
these
issues
in
generalterms,
and morespecifically,
how
they
affectthe
individual
fur
niture projects.
The
projects willthen
serve as adirect
illus
tration
ofmy
workto
colleagues and prospectiveI
wouldlike
to
thank M.S.
for
allthe
thought-provoking
breakfast
conversations and otherwiseendless support
throughout
the
year.I
am gratefulto
Doug
Sigler
andBill
Keyser
for
their
interest
in
and concernfor
my work,
andto
Gary
Griffin
andKarl
vonHachtfor the
guidancethey
have
given me.Prior
to
attending Rochester
Institute
ofTech
nology,
I
worked as an architecturaldesigner
andlicensed
general contractorin the San Francisco
area.
I
sharedownership
of a smalldesign
corporation
with a colleaguefrom The
University
ofCali
fornia
atBerkeley;
weboth
graduated withdegrees
in
architecturefrom
the
College
ofEnvironmental
Design
in
1974.
After
four
years of avariety
of workexperiences,
I
decided
to
focus
my
attention onthe
area of woodworking
andfurniture
design.
This
decision
led
meto
enterthe Masters
program atR.I.T.
Graduate
schoolhas
given methe opportunity to
acquire a
foundation
in
the
skills andtechniques
of woodworking.
The
thesis
year,
besides
adding
to
this
technical
knowledge,
has
been
atime
for
critical
self-evaluation and atime
to
questionthe
aesthetics of
my
work.This
thesis
yearhas
been
anintrospective
one.It
has
prompted a reassessment ofthe
values whichI
had
assimilatedfrom my
architecture studies andmy
work experiences.It
has
alsointroduced
meto
field
offurniture
design.
The
intent
ofthis
paperis
to
synthesize adesign
philosophy,
onethat
gives"One
ofhumanity's
primedrives
is
to
understandand
to
be
understood."!The
creative process
is
anactive attempt
to
clarify
and share our understanding
of ourlife
experiences.During
that
process oneexamines and redefines one's perceptions.
Both
self-awareness and awareness of one's environment and
culture are utilized
during
creativethought
andwork.
The
product ofthat
activity
is
a manifestation
ofevolving
perceptions andis
intended
to
communicate
to
othersthat
whichthe
individual
has
understood.
"The
creative processis
the
process ofchange,
of
development,
ofevolution,
in
the
organizationof subjective life."2
The
processinvolves
severalstages,
each withits
ownlevel
ofinvolvement
onthe
part ofthe
artist.The
processis
notentirely
logical
orexplainable,
nor canit
simply
be
outlined
andfollowed
at will.There
are,
however,
certain
aspects ofthe
process,
which,
whenunderstood,
can
only
help
to
nurturethe
artist's creative activity
andimprove
the
possibilities of success.The
Japanese
Zen
masters sawtechnical
profiere-ative
thought.
"Draw
bamboo
for
ten years;
become
a
bamboo;
then
forget
all aboutbamboo
when you aredrawing.
In
possession of
infallible
technique,
the
individual
placeshimself
atthe mercy
ofinspiration.
Artist
andproduct,
man andobject,
are one.Selfhood
is
extinct andthe
genius can unfold without
limitation.
"3Infallible
technique
is
notnecessarily
a prerequisite
for
creative activity.Rather,
the
impor
tant
point ofthis
Zen
attitudeis
that
the
work can unfold withoutlimitation.
Just
as an artist should notbe
limited
by
alack
of skills orknowledge,
it
is
equally
important
that
one notbe
inhibited
by
a preoccupation withprocess and
technique
and withproducing
objects which aremerely
evidence of one's virtuosity.In
World
ofthe
Makers,
Edward
Lucie-Smith
pointsto
the
needfor
craftsmento
avoid suchlimitation:
"When
skillis
preserved afterthe
needfor
it
is
gone,
then
it
turns
into
an exercisein
pure virtuosity.It
is
the
knowing
how to
do
it
andnot
the
endproduct,
which givesdelight.
Yet
it
mustbe
recognizedthat
crafts exercisedin
this
way,
for
their
ownsake,
orin
simplerejection of
the
modern world andits
assumedevils,
seldom produceOne
must also notbe limited
by
a preoccupationwith solutions
already
in
existence.Original
thought
demands
that
the
individual
look
beyond
that
whichis
known,
disregard
that
whichis
prevalent orvogue,
and
develop
newforms
based
on personal perceptions.A
vital part of creativeactivity
occurs whenthere
is
an absence ofwill,
when one's mindis
free
to
work at unconsciouslevels,
free
from the
confines of rationalthought,
free to
follow
one'sintuition.
"Your
intuition
is
your most exacting
sense,
it
is your most reliable sense.It
is
the
most personal sensethat
asingularity
has,
and,
intui
tion,
notknowledge,
mustbe
consid ered your greatest gift. "5One
must cultivate asensitivity to
the
spontaneous
developments
of unconsciousactivity,
andlearn
to
recognize elements ofintimation
asbeing
worthy
offurther
study
and refinement.The
artist must evaluate and revisehis
orher
intuitive
ideas
to
achieve aformat
capable ofclearly
communicating
the newly
perceived order.Each
individual
must establish personal guidelinesfor this
refinementprocess,
andidentify
the
valuesresponsibilities which pertain
to
his
work.It
is
the
conscious referralto
this
identity during
the
creative process
that
encourages work of substanceand conceptual value.
Because
my
workis
concerned withthe
creationof
'objects',
those
things
which serve adefined,
functional
purpose,
I
am adesigner.
Design
is
a socialdiscipline.
Its
primary
purpose
is
to
make objectsfor
peopleto
use andto
enjoy.
As
such,
I
recognizethe
fact
that
I
could notbe
satisfiedproducing
furniture
on a speculative
basis,
nordo
I
aspireto
create museum piecesfor
exhibition or publication.My
interest
in
de
signing
andbuilding
furniture
is
to
satisfy
the
functional
requirements ofthe
project,
andto
respond
to
the
particular needs ofmy
clients.The
designer's
individuality
andcreativity
areinfluenced
by
the
uniquelife
experiences and perceptions
brought
to
the
design
process.My
design
process,
my
attitudestowards
materials and construction and preferences
for
visual qualities andforms
have
been greatly
influenced
by
my
architecMy
identity
as adesigner
is
determined
by
my
responsiveness
to
the
nature ofthe
pieceto
be
constructed.
I
begin
ray
design
process whenI
clarify
and verbalize
my
perceptions ofthe
essence ofthe
object.
Louis
Kahn
refersto
this
essence or natureof
things
as'Form'.
"Form
encompasses aharmony
ofsystems,
a sense oforder,
andthat
whichdistinguishes
one existencefrom
another. "6Designing
is
a comprehensivethought
process;
decisions
madeconcerning
one aspect of adesign
must
be
made with an awareness oftheir
potentialeffect on all other parts of
the
whole.Reference
to
the
'Form'of
that
whole,
to
the
nature ofthe
object,
gives purpose anddirection
to
design
deci
sions,
and guidesthe
refinement ofintuitive
ideas
towards
afinal
design.
An
important
criteriafor
evaluating
the
success of a projectis
the
degree
to
whichthe
original concept of 'Form'is
evidentand understandable.
The
more purethe
substantiation of'Form',
the
more
likely
the
essence ofthe
object willbe
under stood.Pureness
implies
neithersimplicity
or com"being
such and no other . . .containing nothing
that
does
notbelong.
"7Purity
resultsfrom the
prevalence of an
interdependent
relationship
among
various
design
elements,
all of which contributeto
the whole,
and none of which canbe
removedwithout
lessening
the
impact
ofthe
statement.Pureness
knows
no specificform
or appearance.It
is
aquality
which existssimultaneously
in
the
visually
complex and ornamentedChartres
Cathedral
in
France,
andin the
minimal and austere EastWing
of
the National
Gallery
in
Washington,
D.C.
Each
piece offurniture
I
build
is
a responseto
particulardesign
parameters andto
my percep
tions
of its nature and its uniqueness.While
my
approach encourages a
diversity
ofdesigns,
the
qualities of pureness and resolution are
those
whichI
try
to
achievein
allmy
projects.In
furniture
design,
pureness exists when ahar
monious
interrelationship
ofdesign
elements prevails,While
satisfying
the
needs ofthe
client andthe
func
tional
requirements ofthe
project,
I
give equal consideration
to
the
environmentin
whichthe
piece willrest and
the
quality
ofactivity
it
will serve.ness also requires an
internal
harmony
ofform,
materials,
construction anddetailing.
Furniture,
as
such,
can emanate a sense ofresolution,
ofin
ternal
calm,
and ofexisting
in
a state of equilibrium with
its
surroundings.My
attitudestowards
materials and constructionhave
been
greatly
influenced
by
my
study
of architecture
andengineering,
andby
my
construction workexperiences.
I
amconsistently
mostimpressed
withthe
work of architects and engineers whodemonstrate
an
extraordinary
mastery
ofbuilding
materials.Of
particular interestto
me arethe
reinforcedconcrete structures
by
Pier Nervi
andT.Y.
Lin,
the
light-weight
tension
structuresby
Frei
Otto
andR.
Buckminster
Fuller,
the
stoneworkby
Frank
Lloyd
Wright,
steel-frame buildingsby
Mies
vander
Rohe,
and
the
woodbuildings
by
Charles
andHenry Green,
William Wurster
andBernard
Maybeck.
These
designers share a'truth
to
materials'approach
to
their
workby
whichbuilding
materialsare used
in
accordance withtheir
particular structural
characteristics.They
have
created structuresthe
chosenmaterials,
and whichhave
encouragedinnovation
in
the
building
constructiontechnologies
of
the
time.
Louis
Kahn
was perhapsthe
most articulatein
expressing his
attitudetowards
materials,
as seenin his
'conversation
with abrick':
"If
youthink
ofbrick,
and youare
consulting
the
orders,
you considerthe
nature ofbrick.
You
say
to
brick,
"What
do
youwant,
brick?"Brick
saysto
you,
"I
like
an arch."And
yousay,
"Arches
areexpensive,
andI
can use a concretelintel
over anopening.
What
do
youthink
ofthat,
brick?"Brick
says,
"I
like
an arch. "8Wood
is
availablein
avariety
offorms
andproducts:
greenwood,
kiln
or air-driedlumber,
ply
wood,
veneers,
particleboard,
masonite and paper.Each
ofthese
forms
has
its
own visualqualities,
connotations and structural properties.
The designer
must choose
that
form
of material mostharmonious
with
the
'Form* ofthe
objectto
be
constructed,
and use
it
in
away
that
is
mosthonest
to
its
structural characteristics.
The
form
and actual species of wood usedin
furniture
projects shouldbe
correspondentto
the
environment
in
whichthey
areto
function.
Their
appearance should also
be
responsiveto
the
indi
vidual client's preferences
for
visual elements ofform,
shape and ornamentation.Before
designing
the
actualfurniture
for
my
thesis
work,
it
wasnecessary
to
define
as specifically
as possiblethe
environmentin
whichthe
pieces would
be
located,
the
quality
ofthe
busi
ness activities
they
wouldserve,
and,
asI
amthe
client
for the
projects,
to
recognizethe
qualitiesof visual appearance which
I
would preferfor
my
workplace.
Although
the
exactbuilding
in
whichmy
business
will
be
located
is
currently
unknown,
I
do
know
of several suitablelocations
for the shop
in
San
Fran
cisco.
The
city
offers a centrallocation
accessibleto
an extensive metropolitan area andi3
astimulating
environmentin
whichto
live
and work.Most
rentalproperty
is
availableby
the
squarefoot;
large
commercialbuilding
spaces are subdividedfor many
smallbusinesses.
It
is
commonto
lease
aspace and
to
build
ordemolish
interior
partitionsto
suit one's needs.I
have
assumedthis
sort offlexibility
in
spaceplanning,
andhave
defined
various
spatial relationships asthey
wouldbest
servemy
business
operation.Work
areas willbe
arrangedin
arelatively
for
malmanner,
with a separation ofvarying
activities andthe
spacesthey
require.The
largest area willbe
the
workshop,
organizedinto
several smaller work areasfor
lumber
storage, milling,fine
machinework,
construction, assembly,
finishing,
tool
and suppliesstorage.
Totally
separatefrom
the workshop
willbe two
smaller areas:
the
office and conference spaces.While
they
may
be
in
separaterooms,
orsimply
separate areas within a
larger room,
I
feel
it
is
imperative
that
they
be
isolated from the workshop
space.
The design
andbusiness
areais
whereI
do
my
designing
anddrafting,
wherejob
records and plansare
kept,
and where allfinancial
accounting
andbusiness
workis
done.
It
is
mostdesirable
that
drafting
surfaces anddrawing
storagebe
dust-free,
therefore
they
require an air-tight separationfrom
the
workroom.The
conference area willbe
aclean,
unclutteredone,
providing for the
visit of clients orcolleagues;
a comfortable
setting
for
discussion.
Here,
too,
it
is
important
to
isolate the
chairs andtable,
whichare central
to
the
area,
from
the
dust
ofthe
machineroom.
Beyond
these
practical considerations,there
is
an
equally
important
philosophical purposefor
giving
appropriate space and
furnishings
for these
activities,The
design
processis
nothoused
in
some corner ofthe workshop
whereit
wouldindicate
a subservienceto
the
mechanical processes of construction.Rather,
the design
processis
the
reasonfor
the
workshop,
it
is
a prerequisiteto
construction,
and,
assuch,
should
be
givenpriority
andindependence
in
the
layout
ofthe
shop.Likewise,
the
clientis,
andmust
be
encouragedto
feel
like,
a vitalimpetus
for
the
entire process.The
provisionfor
a special areato
greet and confer with clientsis
indicative
ofmy
belief
in
their
importance to
my
work.At
the
time
I
wasdeveloping
the
schematiclay
out of work
areas,
I
chosethe
projectsto
be
in
cluded
in
the
year's work: aninterior
entrancedoor,
a conference
table
withfour chairs,
a coatrack,
and a
flat
file.
It
was evidentfrom
their
closeproximity
that
all
the
pieces wouldbe simultaneously
visible.While
it
wasimportant
that
each project maintainits
owncharacter,
it
wasdesirable
that
there
prevail acompatibility
andharmony
among
them
all.My
overriding
concern wasthat
the furniture
correspond
to
the
environmentin
whichit
wasto
function.
Each
piece wasto
express a responsivenessto
its
positionin
a business office adjacentto
aworkshop
area.Practical
considerationsindicated
the
needfor strong,
durable
furniture
capable ofwithstanding
the
heavy
daily
use of a workplace.These
parameters encouraged a sense ofunity
among
the
projects.They
suggested visual qualitiesof
strength,
stability
and substantiality.They
alsoencouraged
the
use of'common
materials',
ofredwood,
maple and red
oak,
bronze
andiron.
All
aredomesti
cally
available andrelatively
inexpensive,
thereby
discounting
any
appearance of rareness or extravagance,
which wouldbe
inappropriate
for my working
environment,
and which wouldbe
implied
by
the
useof more exotic woods or precious metals.
I
respond mostpositively
to
visual qualities ofunembellished
directness,
ofsimplicity
and austerity,I
have
appreciatedthese
qualitiesin
the
art andarchitecture of
the
Japanese
Zen
Masters,
and ofthe
modern movement ofTwentieth
Century
America.
Simplicity
is
aquality
I
preferin many
aspectsof
my
life,
andit
is
aparticularly
appropriate onefor
the
appearance ofmy workshop
and ofthe
furni
ture
for my
office and conference areas.I
like
to
work
in
aclean,
uncluttered, well organized environment,
one withempty
walls and open spaces."Simplicity
as a visual expressionis
the
result of continuous elimination
ofthe superfluous,
is
a reduction ofform,
space,
motif,
construction,
function
and materialto
the barest
minimumnecessary
to
comply
withthe
purpose of existence. "8The
reduction of elementsto
a minimumis
for
me a means
to
achieving
the
pureness and resolutionI
desire
in my
work.Together
withthe
needfor
strength and
durability,
the
visualquality
of simplicity
implied
the
use of woodin
solidlumber
form
as
being
suitablefor my thesis
projects.In
board
and plank
form,
massivein
section,
the
strength ofsolid wood
is
revealed,
andthe
use ofclean,
planarforms
is
suggested.Introduction
In
September,
I
determined
that
the
projectswould not all
be
designed
atthe
outset ofthe
year
but
asthe
yearprogressed.
Each
piece couldthen
derive
maximumbenefit
from my continuing
thesis
research,
andfrom the
design,
constructionand
final
evaluation ofthe
preceding
project(s).The
door
andtable
werebuilt
during
fall
quarter
whenI
wasresearching
background
materialfor
the
thesis
andbeginning
to
organizemy
thoughts.
During
winterquarter,
I
worked onthe
four
chairsand consolidated
my
research materialinto
the
essential
body
ofthe
paper.The
roughdraft
ofthe
thesis
wasvirtually
completedbefore the
final
de
sign
development
ofthe
coat rack andflat
file,
all
to
be
completedduring
spring
quarter.My
discussion
ofthe
individual
projects contains
direct
referencesto
journal
andreading
noteskept
throughout
the
year and a critical evaluationof
the
completed pieces as products ofthe
evolveddesign
philosophy.Interior
Entrance
Door
The
original conceptfor
the
door
wasthat
it
be
for
the
entranceto
my
office and conferencearea and
that
it
would serve as a signfor my busi
ness.
In
responseto
studying
the
writings of LouisKahn,
I
wantedto
consider whatI
coulddefine
asthe
'nature
of a door' and see whatdesigns
wouldresult
from
such considerations.The
uniqueness of adoor
is
that
it
existsin
its own
form
as aplane;
yetin
its
function
it
provides a
passageway
through
a plane.It
is
attimes
closed andsolid,
and atothers,
open andpenetrable.
I
tried
to
incorporate
this
dual
character
into
the
visual appearance ofthe
door
by
penetrating
its
mass with openings.Redwood,
uniquely
nativeto
California,
waschosen
for
its
rich,
warmappearance,
which,
together
with
its
softness,
would givethe
door
aninviting
quality.
Hardware
elements arebronze,
a warm-tonedand
relatively
soft metal, untreatedto
allow oxidation
to
adark
color astime
progresses.Preliminary
designs
studied variations of waysin
whichto
openthe
door,
as well as waysto
relatethe
door
handle
andhinges
to
the opening
in
orderto
further
reinforcethe
concept of penetration.This
concept was also strengthenedby increasing
the
thickness
ofthe
door
beyond
standard measurements,
thus
providing
a more massivebody
of woodin
contrastto
the
openingspiercing
it.
I
dry
assembled
the
door
and changedfrom
designing
in
quarter scale
to
full
scale.At
full
scale,
oneis
better
ableto
judge
dimensions
of members and relationshipsbetween
volume and
mass,
to
test
certainfunctional
aspects,
such as
height
of atable
or comfort of achair,
and
to
accurately
determine
the focal
point of apiece.
When
one works on a scaledrawing,
it
is
possible
to
visualizethe
entiresubject;
when a project
isincreased
to
actualsize,
it
extendsbeyond
the
scope of a single glance.The
designer
mustde
termine
whatfocal
point willbest
emphasizethe
concept of
the
piece anddevelop
the
composition ofelements
to
lead
the
viewer's eyeto
that
point.The
establishment of afocal
point,
in
an otherwise solid and massive
door,
andthe
resolution ofinconsistencies
among
the
various metal elementsand
their
respectiveopenings,
promptedthe
reduction
ofthe
design to
just
the
handle
passing
through
a single opening.
The
handle
is
the
meansby
whichto
open a
door;
it
is
the
point oneis
physically
drawn
to
andin
contactwith,
andit
is
thus
a naturalfocal
point ofthe
piece.These
decisions
markedthe
end of
the design
process andthe
door
was constructedwith a
long
verticalopening,
the
upper end of whichis
penetratedby
the
combination push-plate andpull-handle.
Months
later,
afterfurther
developing
my
ideasduring
work onthe
thesis
paper,
I
would make onelast
refinementin
the
design
by
reducing
the
opening
to
the
minimumnecessary
to
providefor
the handle.
The
opening
wouldbe
shortened,
andthis
wouldbring
the
penetration ofthe
planeinto
sharpestfocus.
Conference
Table
The
conferencetable
design
wasbegun
whileI
completed
the
finishing
work andhanging
ofthe
entrance
door.
Several
conceptsbrought
to
light
during
thesis
research andthe
design
development
of
the
door
became
major parametersfor
the
table.
Unity
and order were of utmostimportance.
These
qualities were
to
be
achievedby
continuity
among
the
various elements ofthe
table
andconsistency
in
the
treatment
ofdetail.
My
investigation
ofthe
nature of objects continued
to
be
aprimary
design
determinant.
I
wantedto
define
and expressthose
qualities
that
woulddifferentiate
the
conferencetable
from
adining
or othertype
oftable.
A
conferencetable
providesthe
setting
for
exchange
between
designer
and client.It
is
a channel
for
business
discussions,
which arethe
mostproductive when
the
exchangeis
open,
direct
andhonest.
These
qualities of communicationmay
be
expressed
through
the
visualdesign
elements of volume,
directness of resolution of structuralsystems,
clarity
andvisibility
of constructiontechniques
and
details.
My
primary
concern wasthat
the
table
top
andsupporting
elementsbe
compatible,
wellintegrated
parts of
the total design.
To
achieve adirect
visualrelationship
between
the
two,
planar members wereused
for the base
ofthe
table
as well asfor
the
top
itself.
The basic
arrangement ofthe supporting
memberswas
the
result ofthe
intuitive
design
process.The
design
consists of aflat
plane and a cylindricalsection,
located
at opposite ends of a rectangulartable
andjoined
by
along,
horizontal
stretcher.Refinement
ofthe
design,
with particular attentiongiven
to
the
constructiondetailing,
resultedin
afurther
reinforcement ofthe
harmony
between
the
planar elements.
The
cylindrical support member was constructedby
the
coopering
technique,
whichinvolves
the
ap
proximation of circular
forms
by
an arrangement ofbevel-edged,
planar members.When
arrangedin
analternating order,
these
samebeveled
members combine
to
produce aflat
plane,
andin
this
way
wereused
to
constructthe
flat
support element andthe
table
top.
The
beveled
edgeinherent
in
the
coopering
process
is
appliedto
the
edgetreatment
ofthe
table
top
andthe
lower
stretchers,
and definesthe
angle of
the thru-tenon
wedges.The
individual
components ofthe
table
combineto
produce aharmonious
wholethrough their
similarplanar qualities and ordered system of
joinery
anddetailing.
Visual
simplicity
is
a result of a reduction
of elementsto
a minimum andthe
presentationof
those
elementsin
aclearly
visible system ofconstruction which
is
inherent
in knockdown
furni
ture.
This
simplicity
givesthe
table
adirectness
and
honesty
suitableto
a worktablefor
business
discussions.
The
table
appearsdurable
and substantialin
the
hardness of
its
red oakmaterial,
in
the
thick
proportions of
its
members, andin
its
obvious composition
of solidlumber.
For
the
remainder ofthe
yearthe
conferencetable
has
been
usedin my home for
dining,
entertaining,
andfor
writing,editing
andtyping
this
paper.
Not
long
afterinstalling
the
table,
it
be
came apparent
that
eitherthe
lower
stretcher wastoo
wide,
orthe
table
top
wastoo
narrow,
for
I
hit
my
shins onthe
stretcher whencrossing my
legs
under
the
table.
Though repairable,
the table
presently
containsthis
failure
in
design.
Regardless
of allits
visualqualities and conceptual
strengths,
it
is
an uncomfortable
piece offurniture to
use.The
failure
resulted
from
inadequate
full-scale
mock-ups ofthe
table
during
the
design
process.Four Armchairs
I
nextbegan
design
work onthe
chairs,
mindfulof
the
conferencetable's
shortcomings.I
wasdeter
mined not
to
compromisethe
comfort ofthe
chairsfor
visualconsiderations,
andhoped to
regain abalance between functional
success and conceptualcontent of
the design.
The
chairs also served as ameans
for
further
application ofthe
concept oforder,
not
only
oftheir
owninternal
order,
but
alsothe
external one of
their
relationship
to
the
table.
A
full-scale seating
jig
wasconstructed,
andfrom
it,
the
basic
seat and armrestheights
andangles were
defined.
Development
ofthe
visualap
pearance of
the
chairs proceeded with minimal adjustments
to
the
established measurements.Two
full-scaled prototypes were used
to
carry
outthe
design
process.
They
were constructed out of adifferent
wood
than
redoak,
to
avoidrelying
onthe
superficial
similarity
between chairs andtable
ofthe
same material.
This
allowed meto
concentrate onrelating
the
lines andforms
ofthe
chairsto
those
of
the
conferencetable.
The
faceted
chairback,
though
softenedby
the
upholstery material,
gives adirect
referenceto
the
faceted,
coopered member ofthe table.
The
chairarmrests were
kept
horizontal
to
reiteratethe
dom
inant
horizontal
table
top.
The
individual
wood elements of
the
chairs are uniform and massivein
section,
as arethose
ofthe
table,
and arelikewise
reduced
to
adirect
expression oftheir
structuralfunction,
eachmaintaining
its ownintegrity
whilebeing
a component ofthe
whole.Uniformity
in
size and shape ofmembers,
andcontinuity
in
joinery
and edgedetailing
givethe
chairs
their
internal
order and visiblequality
ofresolution.
Their
form has
been
reducedto
the
mostsimple and
direct
composition while stillachieving
the
desired,
predetermined standard ofseating
comfort.
They
arequiet,
straightforward pieces offurniture,
possessing
aninternal
calm,
andthey
enjoy
aharmonious
compatibility
withthe
conferencetable.
Coat
Rack
There
were several motivationsfor
including
the
coat rack
in
my
thesis
program.The
first
wasthat
it
would offer a relieffrom
the
moretraditional
and
lengthy
projects ofthe
year.The
coat rack wouldalso serve as a gesture of welcome
in
providing
for
the
visit of a client.The
last,
and perhaps mostimportant
purpose ofthe
project,
wasthat
it
wouldillustrate my
interest
in
doing
smaller andless
costly
pieces as well asthe
major,
more complexand more expensive ones.
As
the
function
of a coat rackis
to
servicethe
hanging
ofclothes,
I
sawthe
quality
ofhanging,
ofsuspension,
asbeing
the
essence ofthe
piece.The
design began
withthis
concept and withthe
decision
that,
instead
ofbeing
afloor standing
piece,
the
rack,
as well asthe
clothes,
shouldbe
suspended.The
initial
visualimage
wasthat
of a steelrod,
suspended
from
the
ceiling,
supporting
one end of awood
beam
from
whichthe
clothes wouldhang.
This
image
of ahorizontal
wood member suspendedby
aslender vertical element was
kept
in
mindthrough
out
the design
process.This
is
the
image
I
wantedto
have
most evidentin
the
final
product.There
were several considerations whichhad
to
be
taken
in
the
further
development
ofthe
design:
the
needto
incorporate
a shelffor
hats,
to
givestability to
the
woodstructure,
to
anchorthe
unsupported end
to
the
wall andto
providefor
the
mechanics of
the
rod andhangers.
Resolution
ofthe
wood structure was guidedby
a concern
for
the
establishment of astrong
hori
zontal element:
to
contrast withthe
verticallines
of
the
suspensionrod,
coathangers
and coats.This
in
turn
reinforcedthe
linear
quality
inherent
in
the
steel elements.The
beam
was extendedto
along,
tapering
form
whichbegins
anchoredto
the
wall,
projects out
far
enoughto
providefor
the
hanging
clothes,
andthen
turns
againto
run parallelto
the
wall.To
stabilizethe
wood structure andto
providea
horizontal
surfacefor
hats,
three
wide slatsbridge
the
back
andfront
members.They
are positioned
so as notto
interrupt
the
continuity
ofthe
beam's
horizontal line.
Detailing
onthe
corners ofthe
wood structure was alsointended
to
reinforcethe
line
ofthe
piece.Though
I
choseto
use exposeddovetails
for their
strength and structural expressiveness,
the
proportions ofthe
joints
were elongated and
the
angles ofthe
pins andtails
weresoftened
to
minimizetheir
interruption
ofthe
movement of
the
tapering
wood element.The
suspensionelement,
coathangers,
andhanger
rod were all
fabricated
out of mildsteel,
andthey
were
blackened
in
the
forge
to
providethe
strongestcontrast
to
the
light
maple wood.The
actualdevice
for
hanging
the
clothes,
the hanger
rod,
is
notvisible.
What
canbe
seenis
the
vertical suspensionelement,
the
coathangers,
and a steeldot
protruding
through the
end ofthe
maple.The
vieweris
enticedinto
making
the
connectionbetween
the
visible steelelements,
thereby discovering
the hidden
horizontal
rod
by
whichto
hang
one's clothes.Flat
File
The
flat
file
is
distinguished from the
otherthesis
projectsby
its
location
in
the
workplaceand
its
design
parameters.The
entrancedoor,
table,
chairs and coat rack are
specifically
intended
for
the
conferencearea,
andthey
weredesigned
andbuilt
ascustom,
one-of-a-kind pieces.The
flat
file,
a
drawer
and shelf systemfor storing large
drawings,
is
to
be
usedin
the
design
anddrafting
work areaand
it
wasdesigned
to
be
a prototypefor
limited
production.
Flexibility
within a standard module was adoptedas a systems approach
during
design
development.
It
was
decided
that
there
wouldbe three
basic
variations
to
be
provided: adrawer
unitfor
storing flat
sheets of
drawings,
ashelving
unitfor
rolls ortubes
ofdrawings,
and alight
table
and slide storage unit.
All
wereto
be
housed
in
identical
carcasses which could
be
usedtogether
in
varying
arrangements or as
individual
units.A
flat
file
differs
from
most other chests ofdrawers
orshelving
systemsby
its
content-paper.
The
uniqueness of such afile,
then,
lies
in
the
layered
storage ofthin,
planar sheets of material.The
visual qualitiesI
wantedto
achievein
the
file
werethose
of a construction ofplanes,
anda
layered
orstacking
referenceto
the
paperit
contains.
The resulting
design
is
that
of a modular carcass
unit,
20
inches
high,
27
inches
deep,
and39
inches
wide.It
is
detailed
to
be
seenfrom
allsides,
and as a single unit couldsimply
be
placedon
top
of alayout
table
asis
oftendone
in
anarchitect's office.
The
top
andbottom
edges ofthe
carcass are notchedto
facilitate
the
stacking
of
two
or moreunits;
two
combineto
aheight
of39 inches,
whichis
standardheight
for
drafting
surfaces.
The
top
ofthe
unitis
anindependent
frame,
which
may
be
removedif
the
arrangement ofthe
unitsis
to
be
changed,
and which canbe
either awood,
formica,
or glasstop
surface.The
latter
wouldbe
for
the
lighttable,
withfluorescent
fixtures
housed
in
the
top
drawer
ofthe
standarddrawer
unit,Although
the
drawer unitis
faced
by
four
drawer
fronts,
andthe
shelving
unitby
two
hinged
cabinetdoors,
acontinuity
between the two
systems wasachieved
through
a consistenttreatment
ofdetail.
A
1/8
inch
reveal separatesthe
drawer
fronts
from
each other and
is
the
spacebetween the
cabinetdoors.
All
are separatedfrom
their
respective carcasses
by
this
same reveal.This
detail
is
also seenbanding
the
entire carcass wherethe
top
frame
notchesinto
the
upper unit and where one unit stacksatop
another.
The
drawers
anddoors
sharethe
samere-cessed-notched pull
system,
whichis
intended
to
minimize
the
disruption
ofthe
planar cabinetfronts.
The resulting
visualimage
is
one of a composition
ofisolated,
floating
planes,
and of avisibly
layered
system ofcomponents,
both
indioative
ofthe
contents of
the
file.
In
this
year,
I
have
reassessedmy
beliefs
anddefined
new personal values.In
doing
so,
I
have
gained a more
full
appreciation ofmy
architecturebackground
andhow
it
has
influenced
my
attitudesand
perceptions.
I
amdeveloping
aphilosophy
whichidentifies
me as a
designer,
and whichhas
given guidanceto
the
projectsI have
completedthis
year.While
this
philosophy
willhopefully
continueto
evolvein
the
future,
I
acceptit
in
its
present state asthe
foundation for
my
work atthis
time.
I
amultimately
motivatedby
the
concernthat my
furniture
serve itsfunction
andmy
clients successfully.
I
am most satisfied whenit
cando
so with anappearance of
harmony
andresolution,
both
withinit
self and with
its
surroundings,
and whenthe
pieceis
clearly
expressive ofmy
original perceptions ofits
nature.
The
immediate
value ofthese
projectsto
meis
the
technical
knowledge
and conceptualunderstanding
I
have
gained
from
designing,
constructing
andevaluating
them,
Their
ultimate success willbe
determined
whenthey
areinstalled
andfunctioning
in my working
environment.1.
R.
BuckminsterFuller,
"Design
in
aDynamic
Technology",
Syracuse,
N.Y.,
Syracuse Univer
sity
Press,
1972,
p.130
2.
Brewster
Ghiselin,
The Creative
Process.
New
York,
N.Y.,
Mentor
Press,
1952,
p.20
3.
Heinrich
Engle,
The
Japanese
House.
Vermont
&
Tokyo,
Chas.
E.
Tuttle
Co.,
1964,
p.367
4.
Edward
Lucie-Smith,
World
ofthe
Makers,
London,
England,
Paddington Press
Ltd.,
1975,
p.10
5.
John
E.
Lobell,
Between
Silence
andLight,
Boulder,
Colo.,
Shambala
Publications,
1979,
p.126.
Ibid.,
p.28
7.
(Gove,
Philip
Babcock),
Webster's
Third
New
International
Dictionary
ofthe
English
Language.
Springfield,
Mass.,
G.
andC.
Merriam
Co.,
1976,
p.
1845
8.
John
E.
Lobell,
p.40
1
.Adachi,
Barbara,
The
Living
Treasure
ofJapan,
Tokyo,
New York &
San
Francisco,
KodonshaInter
national
Ltd.,
1973
2.
Arabasz,
Emilo,
The
Architecture
ofLuis
Barragan,
New
York,
N.Y.,
The
Museum
of ModernArt,
1976
3.
Anderson,
Eric,
Design
and Aestheticsin
Wood,
Syracuse,
N.Y.,
Syracuse
University Press,
1972
4.
Austin,
Robert
andUeda,
Koichiro,
Bamboo,
New
York
andTokyo,
John
Weatherhill,
Inc.,
1970
5.
Banham,
Reyner,
Theory
andDesign
in
The
First
Machine
Age.
New
York,
N.Y.,
Praeger
Publishers,
1960,
pp.265-331
6.
Casanelles,
E.,
Antonio
Gaudi:
A
Reappraisal,
Greenwich,
Conn.,
1967,
New York Graphic
Society
Ltd.
7.
Drexler,
Arthur,
Charles
Eames.
Furniture.
New
York,
N.Y.,
The
Museum
ofModern
Art,
1973
8.
Engle,
Heinrich,
The Japanese
House:
A Tradition
for
Contemporary
Architecture,
Tokyo,
Vermont,
Chas.
E.
Tuttle
Co.,
1964
9.
Finn,
David,
Henry
Moore:
Sculpture
andEnviron
ment,
New
York,
N.Y.,
Harry
N.
Abrams,
Inc.,
1976
10.
Fuller,
R.
Buckminster,
Utopia
orOblivion,
New
York,
N.Y.,
Simon
andSchuster,
1969
11.
Ghiselin,
Brewster,
The Creative
Process,
New
York,
N.Y.,
Mentor
Press,
1952
12.
Giurgola,
Romaldo,
andMehta,
Jaimini,
Louis
I.
Kahn.
Boulder,
Colo.,
Westview
Press,
1975
13.
Glaeser,
Ludwig,
Ludwig
Mies
vander
Rohe,
New
York,
N.Y.,
The
Museum
ofModern
Art,
1977
14.
Hunter,
Sam,
Isamu
Noguchi.
New
York,
N.Y.,
Abbeville
Press,
Inc.,
1979
15.
Lobell,
John
E.,
Between
Silence
andLight:
Spirit
in
the
Architecture
ofLouis
Kahn,
Boulder,
Colo.,
Shambala
Publications,
1979
16.
Lucie-Smith,
Edward,
World
ofthe
Makers,
London,
England,
Paddington Press
Ltd.,
1975
17.
O'Keefe,
Georgia,
Georgia
O'Keefe.
New
York,
N.Y.,
The
Viking
Press,
1976
18.
Read,
Herbert,
The
Art
ofSculpture.
Princeton,
N.J.,
Princeton
University
Press,
1956
19.
Russell,
John,
Henry Moore.
Middlesex,
England,
Penguin
Books
Ltd.,
1968
20.
Soleri,
Paolo,
Matter
Becoming Spirit,
Garden
City, N.J.,
Anchor
Press
/
Doubleday,
1973