Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
8-1-1989
Modification of structurally different polymers
downstream of a microwave plasma
J. Patrick Kusior
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion
in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact
Recommended Citation
MODIFICATION OF STRUCTURALLY DIFFERENT POLYMERS
DOWNSTREAM OF A MICROWAVE PLASMA
J.
PATRICK KUSIOR
August. 1989
THESIS
SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE
APPROVED:
Vladimir Vukakovic
Project Advisor
Gerald A. Lakaez
Chemistry Department Head
and Project Advisor
Robert A. Clark
MateriaLs
~c~enceana
Engineering and Project
Advisor
Robert A. Clark
Director. Materials
Science and Engineering
Library
Rochester Institute of Technology
Rochester. New York 14623
MODIFICATION
OF
STRUCTURALLY
DIFFERENT
POLYMERS
DOWNSTREAM
OF
A
MICROWAVE
PLASMA
I.
J.
Patrick
Kusior,
hereby
grant permissionto
the
Wallace
Memorial
Library,
ofR.I.T.,
to
reproducethis
thesis
in
whole orin
part.Any
reproduction will notbe
for
commercial use or profit.TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
i
1.0.
INTRODUCTION
1
1.1.
Etching
4
1.2.
Fluorination
5
1.3.
Parameters
Which
Influence
Plasma
Modification
ofPolymers
1.3.1.
Temperature
10
1.3.2.
Microwave
Power
10
1.3.3.
Gas
Composition
12
1.3.4.
Gas
Flow
Rate
13
1.3.5.
Gas
Flow
Velocity
13
1.3.6.
Optical
Eramission
Spectroscopy
and
the
[0]/[F]
Ratio
14
1.4.
Chemistry
ofthe
CF4-02
Discharge
16
1.5.
Atomic
Oxygen
Production
19
1.6.
Reactions
atSaturated
andUnsaturated
Polymer
Surfaces
22
2.0.
EXPERIMENTAL
23
2.1.
Microwave
Plasma
Modification
System
2.1.1.
Reactor
Chamber
andInjector
Tube
24
2.1.2.
Laser,
Photodiode,
Ammeter
and
Chart
Recorder
31
2.1.4.
Gas
Flow
Readout
Unit
andMass
Flow
Controllers
35
2.1.5.
Microwave
Source
andMicrowave
Clip-on
Cavity
38
2.1.6.
Vacuum
System
39
2.2.
Substrate
Analysis
2.2.1.
Gravimetric
Analysis
40
2.2.2.
X-ray
Photoelectron
Spectroscopy
41
2.2.3.
Scanning
Electron
Microscopy
41
2.2.4.
Goniometry
42
2.3.
Sample
Preparation
2.3.1.
Polyimide
46
2.3.2.
Polyvinyl
Alcohol
47
2.3.3.
Polybutadiene
47
2.3.4.
Polystyrene
48
2.3.5.
Polyethylene
48
2.3.6.
Kapton
H
(a
brandname
of polyimide)..49
3.0.
RESULTS
3.1.
Etching
ofStructurally
Different
Polymers
Downstream
of aMicrowave
Plasma
as aFunction
ofGas
Composition
49
3.2.
Contact
Angle
Measurements
ofStructurally
Different
Polymers
as aFunction
ofGas
Composition
52
3.3.
Removal
ofFluorination
Experiments
56
4.0.
DISCUSSION
4.1.
Discussion
ofthe
Etching
Experiments
74
4.2.
Discussion
ofthe
Fluorination
Experiments....
94
4.3.
Discussion
ofthe
Removal
ofPassivation
Experiments
95
4.4.
Discussion
ofthe
Scanning
Electron
Microscope
Investigations
98
FIGURE
CAPTIONS
1.
Reaction
scheme ofF
atoms reacting ata saturated polymer surface
6
2.
Electron
micrograph
of a spin coatedPI
waferthat
wasf
luorinated
for
130
minutes8
(See
note onlast
page ofthe
Figure
Captions)
3
.Graph
of atomicpercent vs . exposure
time
of a spincoated
PI
sampledownstream
of afluorine-rich
microwave plasma
9
4.
Graph
ofthe
temperature
vs.time
and etch ratevs.
time
for
a spin coatedPI
wafer11
5.
Flow
chart ofthe
reactionsoccurring
in
Table
1....
18
6.
Electron
reactionsoccurring
in
aMW
plasmawith molecular oxygen, atomic oxygen and excited
state molecular oxygen
20
7.
Electron
induced
dissociation
of molecularoxygen via
two
different
excited state molecularoxygen
intermediates
21
8.
Schematic
ofthe
MW
plasma modification apparatus...25
9
.Schematic
ofthe
reactor chambershowing
the
x,
y
and zdistances
26
10.
Sample
holder
for
Kapton
film
29
11
.Sample
holder
for
spin coated wafers30
12.
Figure
showing
the
technique
oflaser
interf
erometry
32
13.
Ratio
of atomicline
intensities
01
845/ArI
750
nmand
Fl
704/ArI
750
nm as afunction
ofCF4
concentration
in
an02-CF4-Ar
MW
plasma37
14.
Front
and side view ofvertically
fixed
PI
wafer....43
15.
Contact
angle.QT
,formed
at a polymer surface.V
represents vapor(usually
air),S
-polymer
surface,
L
-liquid
(usually
water) ando
is
the
interfacial
tension
45
16.
Etch
rate vs.%
02
for
structurallydifferent
17.
Variations
in
contact anglesfor
structurallydifferent
polymers exposeddownstream
ofCF4-02
mixtures
containing
5
%
Ar
54
18.
Etch
rate obtainedby
laser
interf
erometry as afunction
oftime
of exposure of severalfluorinated
PI
spin coated wafersto
an oxygen-rich plasma57
19.
Weight
ofpassivated
PI
wafers as afunction
ofetch
time
58
20.
"Corresponding
etch rate"of
fluorinated
PI
wafers as afunction
oftime
of exposuredownstream
of anoxygen-rich
MW
plasma59
21.
SEM
micrographs ofKapton
H
that
was etchedfor
70
minutes64
22.
SEM
micrograph ofKapton
H
that
wasfluorinated
for
30
minutes andthen
etchedfor
10
minutes65
23.
SEM
micrographs ofKapton
H
that
wasfluorinated
for
30
minutes andthen
etchedfor
20
minutes66
24.
SEM
micrographs ofKapton
H
that
wasfluorinated
for
30
minutes andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes67
25.
SEM
micrographs ofKapton
H
that
wasfluorinated
for
30
minutes andthen
etchedfor
50
minutes68
26
.SEM
micrograph ofKapton
H
that
wasfluorinated
for
30
minutes andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes69
27.
SEM
micrograph ofKapton
H
that
wasfluorinated
for
40
minutes andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes70
28.
SEM
micrograph ofKapton
H
that
wasfluorinated
for
50
minutes andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes71
29
.SEM
micrograph ofKapton
H
that
wasfluorinated
for
60
minutes andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes72
30.
SEM
micrograph#
1
of a spin coatedPI
samplethat
was
fluorinated
for
60
minutes andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes.See
location
of micrographin
Fig.
38...
76
31.
SEM
micrograph#
2
of a spin coatedPI
samplethat
was
fluorinated
for
60
minutes andthen
etchedfor
32.
SEM
micrograph
tt
3
of a spin coatedPI
samplethat
wasfluorinated
for
60
minutes andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes.See
location
of micrographin
Fig.
38...
78
33.
SEM
micrograph
tt
4
of a spin coatedPI
samplethat
was
fluorinated
for
60
minutes andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes.
See
location
of micrographin
Fig.
38...
79
34.
SEM
micrograph
tt
5
of a spin coatedPI
samplethat
was
fluorinated
for
60
minutes andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes.See
location
of micrographin
Fig.
38...
80
35.
SEM
micrograph
tt
6
of a spin coatedPI
waferthat
wasfluorinated
for
60
minutes andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes.See
location
of micrographin
Fig.
38...
81
36.
SEM
micrographtt
7
of a spin coatedPI
waferthat
wasfluorinated
for
60
minutes andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes.See
location
of micrographin
Fig.
38...
82
37
.Location
of micrographs^
1
-^
7
83
38.
Edge-on
view of a spin coatedPI
samplethat
wasfluorinated
for
30
minutes andthen
etchedfor
60
minutes85
39.
Etch
rate ofstructurally
different
polymerswhich were exposed
downstream
of an02-CF4-Ar
MW
plasma89
40.
Schematic
of a polymer molecular orbital whichshows
the
lowest
unoccupied molecular orbital(LUMO)
andthe
highest
occupied molecularorbital
(
HOMO )
90
41.
Graph
ofthe
optimumCF4
concentration(%)
vs.the
number of
C=C
bonds
per"mer"
mass
93
42
.Section
of chart paper which showsthe
resumptionof
etching
96
Note:
Throughout
the
text
the
phrase"spin
coatedPI
wafer"is
used.This
phrase refersto
a silicon waferthat
has
been
spin coated with polyamic acid.
To
curethe
polyamic acid,the
silicon wafer was placedin
an oven.The
curing
processLIST
OF
TABLES
1
.Reaction
set ofthe
most prominent reactions
occurring
in
an02-CF4
MW
Plasma
17
2
.Structure
ofpolymers
50
3
.Results
of contactangle measurements
for
experiments
downstream
of aCF4-02
mixturecontaining
5%
Ar
53
4.
Comparison
of contact angle measurements, of various polymers ,taken
before
exposureto
the
CF4-02-Ar
MW
plasma andthe
maximum valuesobtained
after exposureto
the
CF4-02-Ar
MW
plasma
55
5.
Weight
loss
following
20
minutes ofetching
with an oxygen-rich plasma onpreviously
fluorinated
PI
substrates60
6.
Weight
loss
following
30
minutes ofetching
with an oxygen-rich plasma onpreviously
fluorinated
PI
substrates61
7.
Weight
loss
after40
min. ofetching
ofPI
substrates
previously
fluorinated
20
and30
min.Weight
loss
after60
min. ofetching
ofPI
substrates
previously
fluorinated
for
46
and60
minutes63
8
.Crater
diameters
ofKapton
H
samplesthat
werefluorinated
for
30
minutes andthen
etchedfor
various
times
73
9
.Crater
diameters
ofKapton
H
samplesthat
werefluorinated
for
varioustimes
andthen
etchedfor
30
minutes75
10.
Crater
diameters
of a spin coatedPI
samplethat
wasfirst
fluorinated
for
60
min. andthen
etched
for
30
minutes84
11.
Magnification
coding
systemfor
the
scanning
electron microscope
86
12.
Comparison
of maximum etch ratesfor
structurally
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I
wouldlike
to
thank
my
Mother
andfamily
for
instilling
in
methe
value of an education.Many
peoplehave
contributed,in
oneform
or another,to
the
completion ofthis
thesis.
I
thank
my
three
primaryadvisors.
They
are:Dr.
Vladimir
Vukanovic,
Dr.
Gerald
Takacs
andDr.
Robert
Clark.
I
thank
the
outstanding
peoplethat
I
worked with atthe
RIT
Plasma
Lab.
They
are:Dan
Tracy,
Mark
Heitz
.Dr.
David
Harding,
Kevin
Gillman,
Jay
Pinkes
,Matt
Freeman,
Violeta
Mugica
andDr.
Yu.
I
appreciatethe
help
that
Norene
Chesterton,
Debbie
Kipler
andher
husband
Mike
Koch
have
given me withthe
word
processing
ofthis
thesis.
For
making
life
outside ofthe
laboratory
very
1
.0
INTRODUCTION
Since
the
mid1960 's
there
have
been
numerous paperspublished on
the
modification
of organic polymersin
a pureoxygen or oxygen-f
luorocarbon
plasma.In
terms
ofthis
thesis,
chemicalmodification
occurs when a polymeris
either
passivated
(fluorinated)
or etched.Many
parametersinfluence
the
degree
to
which a polymeris
modifieddownstream
of a microwave(MW)
plasma.Some
ofthe
parameters
include:
substratetemperature,
MW
power, gasfeed
composition,
chamber pressure andtotal
gasflow
rate;the
latter
two
determine
the
gasflow
velocity.One
ofthe
more
important
parameters,
in
the
case of polyimide(PI),
which
influences
etching,
is
the
[0]/[F]
ratio.That
is.
the
ratio
between
the
atomic oxygen concentration andthe
atomicfluorine
concentration.[1,2,3]
A
topic
ofincreasing
importance
is
the
degree
to
whicha polymer
is
susceptibleto
modification,by
a plasma,according
to
the
structure ofthe
polymer.For
example,is
asaturated polymer more
likely
to
undergoetching
orpassivation compared
to
an unsaturated polymer?In
addition,
the
plasmafluorination
ofstructurally
different
In
1965,
Hansen,
Pascale
,De
Benedictics
andRentzepis
[4]
performed weightloss
experiments on36
structurallydifferent
polymers.The
experiments weredone
to
investigate
the
effect of plasmagenerated
atomic oxygen onthe
polymers.
All
the
polymerstested
underwent rapid reactionsat
the
polymerfilm
-plasma
interface.
Highly
branched
polymers such as polypropylene and polymers
having
etherlinkages
such as polymers offormaldehyde
were most readilyetched.
Polymers
which werethe
most resistantto
reactionswith atomic oxygen were
the
perfluorinated
polymers,highly
aromatic polymers and sulfur-vulcanized rubbers.
Taylor
andWolf
[5]
examinedthe
relative rates ofpolymer removal
in
an oxygen plasmafor
40
polymers.The
removal rates were retarded
if
the
polymer contained eitherone of
the
following:
strong
backbone
bonds,
polarfunctional
groups,
metallicbonds
or an aromatic structure.Weak
bonds
attacheddirectly
to
the
chaingreatly
accelerated
removal;
while weakbonds
not attachedto
the
polymer
backbone
had
little
effect.It
was also reportedthat
allthe
polymers showedincreased
removal ratesif
amixture of
CF4
and02
was used.The
addition ofCF4produces
A
theory
concerning
the
role of atomicfluorine
in
relation
to
the
plasmaetching
ofstructurally
different
polymers
has
been
proposed
by Cain,
Egitto
andEmrai
.[6]
The
mechanisms
ofetching
wereinferred
theoretically
from
amolecular orbital study.
This
theory
is
discussed
in
moredetail
in
section4.0.1.
To
date,
three
methodshave
been
proposed asto
how
F
atoms enhance etching.
They
are:hydrogen
abstraction[7],
addition
to
olefinic groups[8]
andindiscrirainant
abstraction of atoms other
than
hydrogen.
[9]
An
excess ofF
atoms willinhibit
etching
through
competition with0
atoms at sites on
the
polymer surface.[2]
The
excessfluorine
resultsin
the
formation
ofCF2
type
bonding.
[1,2,10,11]
This
work examinesthe
experimentalfactors
whichinfluence
the
surface modifications andbulk
modificationsof
structurally
different
organic polymers.Surface
analysisof
the
polymers was performedby
scanning
electronmicroscopy
(SEM),
x-ray
photoelectronspectroscopy
(XPS)
andcontact angle measurements.
Gravimetric
analysis was usedto
investigate
bulk
modifications.Etch
rates ofthe
polymerswere
determined
by
laser
interferometry
and weightloss
measurements.
The
remaining
portion ofthe
introduction
is
divided
into
five
sections.Sections
1.1
and1.2
give abrief
the
modification
of a polymer whichis
exposeddownstream
ofa
MW
plasma.Section
1.4
describes
the
chemistry
of aCF4-02
plasma.
Section
1.5
looks
atthe
production of atomic oxygenin
aMW
plasma andthe
last
sectionfocuses
onthe
reactionsof
the
plasmaproduced
gas species at saturated andunsaturated
polymer surfaces.1
.1
Etching
In
plasmaetching,
the
starting
material often containsa
relatively
inert
gas.A
low
pressure,LP,
glowdischarge
is
establishedby
subjecting
the
inert
gasto
a source ofenergy;
be
it
a microwave generator or aradio-frequency
generator.
Reactive
gas species are producedby
the
LP
glowdischarge
.Etching
occurs whenthe
reactive species reactwith a
thin
film
to
form
a volatile productthat
is
pumpedaway.
[12-14]
The
rate ofetching
has
been
suggestedto
be
dependent
on eitherthe
rate of active speciesarriving
atthe
polymer surface[15]
orthe
removal rate ofthe
volatileproducts
from
the
polymer surface.[16]
An
important
advantage of plasmaetching
(dry
etching)over wet
etching
is
that
dry
etching
canbe
anisotropic(directional).
Other
advantages are: operatorsafety,
increased
cleanliness,
adaptability
to
automation and aA
substrateundergoing
etching
canbe
in
either oftwo
locations
during
anexperiment.
It
canbe
in
the
plasma(discharge
zone)
orit
canbe
removedfrom
the
plasma.The
term
downstream
plasmaetching
refersto
the
latter
case.Substrates
placeddirectly
in
the
discharge
zone can
be
etched
anisotropically
because
the
plasma
is
at a greaterpositive
electrical
potential
comparedto
the
surfaces withwhich
it
is
in
contact.The
end resultis
that
ions
areaccelerated
along
field
lines
running
perpendicularto
these
surfaces.
[18]
Substrates
downstream
of a plasma
generally
undergo
isotropic
etching.Two
advantagesof
having
the
substrate
downstream
of a plasma are: easier substratetemperature
control and noion
bombardment
induced
damages
at
the
polymer surface.[18]
If
the
sampleis
removedfrom
the
plasma,
it
will alsobe
subjectedto
fewer
electrons andphotons.
1.2
Fluorination
Exposure
of polyimide(PI)
downstream
of aMW
plasma,with a
high
concentration ofCF4
in
the
gasfeed,
leads
to
the
formation
of afluorinated
layer
atthe
PI
surface.[19]
The
mechanismleading
to
this
fluorinated
layer
is
not well
established,
but
it
couldbe
similarto
the
proposed
fluorination
pathway
of a saturated polymer(Figure
WAKENED
Figure
1.
Reaction
scheme ofF
abundance
of0
atoms.[12,19,20]
The
enhanced etchresistance
of plasma-fluorinated
PI
has
been
attributedto
extensive
formation
ofCF2
type
structures onthe
PI
surface.
[22]
The
depth
ofthe
fluorinated
layer
is
dependent
onthe
following:
time
of exposureto
aF-rich
plasma
[12,20,21],
the
chemical composition ofthe
polymer[12,20],
the
plasma parameters andthe
type
ofetching
apparatus.
[12,20,21]
SEM
(scanning
electronmicroscope)
micrographs showthat
the
fluorination
of spin coated polyimide(PI)
does
notalter
the
initially
smooth surface(Figure
2).
XPS
(X-ray
photoelectron
spectroscopy)
studiesby
Matienzo,
Emmi
,Egitto,
Van
Hart,
Vukanovic
andTakacs
[22]
revealthat
the
fluorinated
surface ofPI
reaches a constant composition of56%
F,
35%
C,
3%
N
and17.2%
0
after an approximate10
minute exposure
time
downstream
of a microwave plasma(Figure
3).
The
percent compositionfor
untreated polyimideis
75.9%
C,
6.9%
N,
17.2%
0.
[19]
Rutherford
back
scattering
(RBS)
has
been
used[22]
to
determine
the
depth
offluorination.
For
an exposuretime
of1.5
to
10
minutes,
the
depth
offluorination
increased
linearly.
The
depth
profile reached a maximum of600
A
aftera
30
minute exposuretime.
The
thin
film
was richin
0.55
kx
Figure
2.
Electron
micrograph of a spinU O c 41 o u
<u
Jc
e
o U O
I * I
20
40Time
(minutes)
0
t-N60
Figure
3.
Exposure
time of a spin coatedPI
sample to1-3
Parameters
Which
Influence
Plasma
Modification
ofPolymers
1.3.1
Temperature
For
the
case ofPI
, etch rateincreases
astemperature
increases
(Figure
4).
[23]
The
temperature
dependence
is
normally
described
in
terms
ofthe
activation energy.The
activation
energy
canbe
thought
of as a"barrier"
to
chemical reactions or
the
criticalenergy
that
molecules oratoms must aquire
before
they
can react.[18]
1.3.2
Microwave
Power
An
increase
in
MW
power will resultin
ahigher
etchrate.
For
an02-CF4
plasma,
increased
MW
power enhancesthe
dissociation
of molecular oxygen and carbontetraf
luoride.
As
aresult,
more reactive gas species are produced;that
is,
moreCFx
(x
<4)
and atomic oxygen.[23]
The
chemistry
that
occursin
the
gas phaseis
discussed
in
Temperature
(Celsius)
29
-28
-27
-26
ER
(A/min)
(-260C
-240C
-220C
-2000
-1800
-1600
L400
-1200
1.3.3
Gas
Composition
Carbon
tetraf
luoride,
CF4,
is
the
gas mostcommonly
added
to
an oxygen plasmain
orderto
enhancethe
generationof atomic
oxygen,
thereby
enhancing
the
polymer etch rate.Polymer
etch rates are alsoincreased
because
the
additionof
F
atomslowers
the
activationenergy
associated withthe
etching
of organic polymers.[24]
The
increase
in
0
atomproduction
is
probably
due
to
changesin
the
electrondensity
andenergy
distribution
in
the
plasma and notdue
to
free
radical reactions.[18]
For
CF4-rich
plasmas,
the
addition of molecular oxygenincreases
the
F
atom concentration.The
increase
is
due
to
reactions
between
0
atoms andthe
dissociated
products ofCF4
[25-27]
orthe
reactionbetween
electronically excitedmetastable oxygen molecules and
CF4.
[28]
F
atomproduction
is
important
because
the
F
atoms can abstracthydrogen
atomsfrom
the
polymer[7].
This
creates radicalsites on
the
polymer surface whichreadily
undergo reactions1-3.4
Residence
Time
The
slowerthe
flow
ratethe
longer
a gas molecule willreside
in
the
MW
cavity.The
time
ofresidency
ofthe
gasmolecule
in
the
MW
cavity
is
known
asthe
residence orretention
time
andis
givenby:
T
=L
/
v(1)
where
T
is
the
time
in
minutes,
L
is
the
length
ofthe
MW
cavity
in
centimeters and vis
the
gasflow
velocity
in
standard cubic centimeters per minute.
[29]
1.3.5
Gas
Flow
Velocity
Total
gasflow
rate and chamber pressure aretwo
parameters which are used
to
determine
the
gasflow
velocity,
v.The
equationfor
vis
given below:where
FR
is
the
total
gasflow
rate.PR
is
the
reactorchamber
pressure.
T
is
the
temperature
of
the
gasesin
Kelvin
and ris
the
tube
radius.For
the
5-way
cross(See
section
2.1),
r wasapproximated
to
be
10
cm. vis
proportional
to
FR
andinversely
proportionalto
PR.
[23]
Reactive
gas speciesgenerated
in
the
MW
cavity
take
less
time
to
reachthe
substrate athigher
total
gasflow
rates and
lower
reactor pressures.[23]
A
higher
vdelivers
more plasma produced gas species
to
the
polymer surface perunit
time.
It
alsodecreases
the
gas species chance ofrecombination
by
homogeneous
(gas-phase)
orheterogeneous
(recombination
onthe
chamber walls) processes.A
linear
dependency
was observedfor
the
etch rate of spin coatedpolyimide samples on v
downstream
of a microwave plasmacontaining
75%
02.
20%
CF4
and5%
Ar.
[18]
1-3.6
Optical
Emission
Spectroscopy
and
the
[0]/[F]
Ratio
The
oxygen-to-fluorine atomic concentration ratioin
the
plasma
is
directly
proportionalto
the
ratio ofintensities
of spectral emission
lines
at844.6
nmfor
atomic oxygen and703.7
nmfor
atomicfluorine.
[6]
Optical
emissionspectroscopy
measuresthe
relative numberdensities
of gasspecies
in
a plasma[18]
andby doing
so,
it
provides away
an
optimum
[0]/[F]
ratio at which maximumetching
occurs.The
value ofthe
ratio changesfor
different
polymers andis
a
function
ofthe
chemical
properties ofthe
polymerbeing
etched.
[29]
If
smallamounts
ofCF4
are addedto
an02
plasma,greater
emissionintensities
will occur.
A
higher
electronenergy
distribution function,
EEDF,
with ahigher
populationof
high
energy
electrons and/or ahigher
electrondensity
in
the
plasma canbe
inferred
from
the
greater emissionintensities.
[18]
If
one wishesto
increase
the
number ofelectron
induced
dissociations
in
an02
orCF4
plasma,then
the
addition of small amounts ofCF4
or02
,respectively,
to
these
plasmas willhelp
achievethis
goal.When
the
condition ofthe
plasma changes ,there
is
anaccompanying
changein
the
excitationefficiency
ofthe
plasma.
To
compensatefor
this
change, all emissionintensities
ofthe
gases ofinterest
are normalizedto
anemission
intensity
of a spectralline
from
aninert
gas.[30]
This
technique
is
known
as optical emissionactinometry
.For
02-CF4
plasmas,
the
inert
gas mostcommonly
usedto
normalize atomic oxygen
(844.6
nm)
and atomicfluorine
(703.7
nm)
is
argon.Ar
is
usedbecause
its
emissionline
occurs at
750.4
nm.This
line
is
usedbecause
it
is
nearly
equal
in
intensity
to
both
the
atomic oxygen andfluorine
emit
from
excited statesresulting
from
collisions withelectrons.
[18]
I-4
Chemistry
ofthe
CF4-02
Plasma
A
model ofthe
chemical processesoccurring
in
aCF4-02
discharge
has
been
developed
by
Plumb
andRyan.
[31]
Rate
coefficients
were either calculatedby
the
authors or wereobtained
from
the
literature
for
49
possible reactions whichoccurred
in
aMW
glowdischarge
at a pressure of0
.5
Torr.
Thirteen
ofthe
reactions are consideredto
be
the
mostprominent.
Five
ofthe
reactions are electroninduced
(primary)
andthe
other eight arefree
radical reactions(secondary)
(Refer
to
Table
1).
The
chemistry
ofthe
CF4-02
discharge
is
summarizedby
the
flow
chart shownin
Figure
5.
The
following
is
abrief
description
ofthe
Plumb
andRyan
model.At
high
molecularoxygen
concentrations,
[02],
in
the
plasma,
CF2
producedby
the
electroninduced
dissociation
ofCF4
will react almostentirely
with
0
atoms.The
product ofthis
reaction,COF,
will
rapidly
react with atomic oxygento
form
C02
andF
atoms
(See
reaction9
in
Table
1).
At
long
retentiontimes,
the
C02
producedin
this
step
willdissociate
into
CO
by
reaction
12.
CO
in
turn
reacts with atomicfluorine
to
produce
COF
whichis
recycledto
produceC02
.Downstream
ofTable
1.
Reaction
set of the most prominent reactionsoccurring
in
anO2-CF4
MW
plasma.Reaction Number
Reaction
e
1
CF4
-*CF3
+F
e
2
CF4
+CF2
+2F
3
4
M
CF3
+F
-+-CF4
M
CF2
+F
->-CF3
e
5
02--0
+0
6
CF3
+0
->C0F2
+F
7
CF2
+0
->-COF +F
8
CF2
+0
--C0 +2F
9
COF
+0
-+-CO2
+F
M
10
COF
+F
--C0F2
11
C0F2
'
COF
+F
e
12
C02--CO
+0
M
13
F + CO
CF,
CF
-+-i
CF,
0
*- ?0
-?CO
COF2^
COF
CO.
CO
Figure
5.
Flow
chart of the reactionsare no electrons present.
As
aresult,
[C02]
increases
while[CO]
decreases.
CF2
producedby
the
dissociation
ofCF4
will react withatomic oxygen
to
produceCOF
(reaction
7).
Since
the
dissociation
ofC0F2
is
electroninduced,
longer
retentiontimes
will yield moreproduct.
COF
+F
(reaction
11),
whichwill
eventually
lead
to
moreC02
andCO.
Plumb
andRyan
have
concludedthat
high
F
atom(low
0
atom)
containing
plasmashave
C0F2
asthe
principal productwhereas
high
0
atomcontaining
plasmashave
C02
asthe
principal product.
Since
five
ofthe
sevenfluorine
atomproducing
reactions are
dependent
on atomic oxygen,it
is
worth whileto
investigate
how
the
production of0
atoms canbe
enhanced.
1
-5
Atomic
Oxygen
Production
The
production of atomic oxygenin
a plasmais
dominated
by
electroninduced
dissociations
of molecular oxygenreactions.
Some
ofthe
moreimportant
reactionsbetween
oxygen
(molecular,
atomic andionized)
and electrons areshown
in
Figure
6.
Reactions
15
and16
probably
proceed viaan
intermediate
0
2
(Figure
7).
Reaction
21
(Figure
7)
t +
O;
- O* + e(14)
-
20
+ f(15)
- 0' +
0
-r e(16)
-
o:
+it
(17)
- (0:*)* +
2e
(18)
e +
0
- O' + t(19)
t + 0:*
- (0:*)' + f.
(20)
Figure
6.
Electron
reactions,
occurring
in
a microwave plasma, withmolecular
oxygen,
atomic oxygenand excited state molecular
t t
0.
-OKA-l;,
-0(:P)
-0(3P)
- e(21)
e-f Ot
Oi^B3!;)
0(5P)
+0('D)
+ e(22)
Figure
7.
Electron
induced
dissociation
of molecular oxygen via two
different
excited state molecularproduces
one ground state0
atom and an excited state(ID)
0
atom.
The
dissociation
of molecular oxygen canbe
enhancedby
changing
the
electronenergy
distribution
function.
EEDF
.A
modification
ofthe
EEDF
whichincreases
the
numberdensity
of electrons
that
possessthe
energy
requiredto
dissociate
molecular oxygen will
increase
the
production of atomicoxygen.
1
-6
Reactions
atSaturated
andUnsaturated Polymer
Surfaces
As
statedpreviously,
the
etching
of a polymer canbe
enhanced
by:
indiscriminant
abstraction[9],
fluorine
abstraction of
hydrogen
[7]
orfluorine
additionto
olefinicgroups.
[8]
Hydrogen
abstraction,
andthe
stepsthat
occurafterwards ,
from
a saturated polymerby
fluorine
is
shownin
Figure
1
.Step
1
is
the
abstraction ofhydrogen
to
form
aradical site.
For
afluorine-rich
plasma,fluorine
incorporates
itself
into
the
polymer network.This
leads
to
the
passivation of a polymer(step
2).
For
an oxygen-richplasma,
oxygenforms
abond
atthe
radical site whichweakens
the
adjacentC-C
bond
(step
3).
Step
4
is
analkoxy
degradation
whichbreaks
the
C-C
bond.
For
a saturatedpolymer,
steps1,
3
and4
arethe
proposed reactionsin
the
etching
process: steps1
and2
representthe
passivationThe
etching
ofunsaturated
polymersis
initiated
mostprobably
by
the
addition ofF
or0
atomsto
aC=C
double
bond.
Once
this
occurs,
the
double
bond
is
decreased
to
aC-C
singlebond.
Etching
orpassivation
can now proceedthrough
this
saturatedintermediate.
[18]
In
summary,
the
initiating
step
for
a saturated polymeris
H
abstractionby
F
or0
atoms andit
is
F
or0
atomaddition across a
C=C
double
bond
for
an unsaturatedpolymer.
2.0
EXPERIMENTAL
2.1
Microwave
Plasma
Modification
System
The
microwave system wasdesigned
and constructedby
Edward
A.
Matuszak
[23]
for
his
1986
graduatethesis
work.The
system, asit
was usedfor
the
results ofthis
thesis,
consisted of
12
components:1)
5-way
Pyrex
7740
cross,2)
quartz
injector
tube.
3)
vacuumpump,
4)
microwave(MW)
source,
5)
MW
clip-oncavity,
6)
gasflow
readout unit.7)
mass
flow
controller,8)
pressuregauges,
9)
He-Ne
laser,
10)
chart recorder,11)
ammeter and12)
photodiode.A
schematic of
the
systemis
shownin
Figure
8
.Details
about2.1.1
Reactor
Chamber
andInjector
Tube
The
reactor chamber usedto
investigate
the
passivation,
etching
and removal of passivation ofstructurally
different
polymersdownstream
of aMW
plasmaconsisted
of a5-way
Pyrex
7740
cross.Each
armhas
a 4"(10.16
cm)
i.d.
which extends 7"(17.78
cm)from
the
centerof
the
cross.The
Pyrex
crossis
situated on a workbench
in
such a manner
that
one armis
pointing
towards
the
experimenter,
2
arms arepointing
sideways(one
to
eitherside) and of
the
remaining
2
arms; oneis
extending
downward
and
the
otheris
extending
upward(Figure
9).
The
ends ofthe
arms areflared
with an0-ring
groovein
the
glass.All
the
arms were sealed attheir
endsby
1/4"
thick
aluminum plates.A
H
245
Viton
0-ring
satfirmly
between
the
groovein
the
arms and a groovein
the
aluminumplate.
This
helped
achieve a vacuumtight
seal.The
aluminumplates were
held
in
place againstthe
ends ofthe
cross withmetal
flanges,
inserts,
nuts andbolts.
[23]
The
armfacing
the
experimenter served as anentrance/exit port
for
the
samples.This
arm achieved avacuum
tight
sealin
the
mannerdescribed
above;however,
noflanges,
nuts orbolts
were used.The
aluminum plate washeld
in
place whenthe
reactor chamber was evacuated.The
fi
mm?tcr|
Photodiode
Recorder
Retetof
Chan<lcr(Pyres)
-
1
aieri
Caity
I
nn.
Mnii
r lowControl
T|
c-1
C
cr1 t'l.r.ma SpectrometerF/77y,
!'\
Sample
Holder
Throttle
Valve
-J-^T
Microwave
Sourt
=lf"L
Capacitance
ThermocoupltI
Recorder
HV1
Vacuum Syttcm
withDiMwtion
.mdMechanic*
1
PumptMW
Cavity
(region
of plasma)Injector
Tube
Reactor
Chamber
SubstrateHolder
Figure
9.
Schematic
of the reactor chambershowing
the x,y
and z distances. x-5.3cm,
y-lOcm, z-6.5 cm(with
ring
substrateholder),
facilitated
by
nothaving
to
bolt
an aluminum plate ontothe
entrance/exit
port.The
quartzinjector
tube
wasconnected
to
the
top
aluminum
plate via a 1"stainless
steelCajon
ultra-torrmale
connector.
The
ultra-torr
male connector wasthreaded
into
the
aluminum
plate.Teflon
tape
aroundthe
threads
anda
Viton
0-ring
provided
a vacuumtight
seal.The
inside
ofthe
fitting
wasbored
outin
orderto
allowthe
quartztube
to
passthrough
and enterinto
the
reactor chamber.The
Cajon
fitting
provided a vacuumtight
seal with quick
finger-tight
assembly.
[23]
The
vastmajority
of experiments werecarried out
using
a quartzinjector
tube.
However,
afew
early
experiments
were performedusing
a glassinjector
tube.
The
changefrom
glassto
quartz occurredbecause
quartz reacts
less
withthe
gas species producedby
the
MW
plasma.
After
exposureto
a plasmafor
not morethan
12
hours,
the
glasstube
wasbeginning
to
show signsthat
it
was
being
etched.One
very
noticeable sign wasthat
the
tube
changed
from
being
clear andtransparent
to
that
ofbeing
white and
translucent.
No
such changein
the
quartzinjector
tube
has
been
observed.There
weretwo
kinds
of substrates(samples)
which wereexposed
downstream
ofthe
plasma:1)
films
and2)
spincoated wafers.
The
films
were:Dupont
Kapton
H
andlow
density
polyethylene(PE)
.Polyimide
(PI),
polybutadiene(PB),
polyvinyl alcohol(PVA)
and polystyrene(PS)
were spin(40
micrometers)
was placed on an aluminum stud and analuminum
ring
was pressed ontothe
stud.This
provided acompression
fit
for
the
Kapton
H
film
(Figure
10a).
The
compression
fitting
was placed ontop
of a13.5
cmtall
substrate
holder
and washeld
in
placeby
a screw-oncap
(Figure
10b).
When
no experiments withthe
Kapton
film
werebeing
performed,
the
spin coatedSi
wafers andPE
sampleswere also placed on
top
ofthe
substrateholder.
The
screwon
cap
was usedin
orderto
securethe
spin coated wafer ontop
ofthe
substrateholder
(Figure
11).
Once
in
the
reactor chamber,the
substrateholder
wasplaced on
top
of an aluminum "bridge" which was situatedin
the
middle ofthe
reactor chamber.The
bridge
washeld
in
place
by
four
long
screws.It
is
important
that
the
"bridge"be
held
firmly
in
place.If
it
were notthen
the
angle ofthe
substrateto
the
oncoming
stream of activated gasspecies might
vary
from
experimentto
experiment.This
wouldalter
the
number of gas speciesimpinging
onthe
substrateper
unit
area.Laser
interf
erometry
measurements would alsochange
from
experimentto
experimentif
the
"bridge"
was not
held
in
place.All
experiments onthe
spin coatedSi
wafersand
PE
film
were performed22.2
cm(x+y+z
in
Figure
9)
downstream
from
the
plasma and all ofthe
experiments onKapton
films
were performed21.8
cmdownstream
ofthe
plasma.
The
0
.4
cmdifference
is
due
to
the
thickness
ofthe
Ring
Figure
10a
Exposed
Film Which Remains
_Press-on
Ring
Unexposed
Film
Substrate
Holder
Figure
10b
Figure
10a.
Sample
holder
for
Kapton
H
film.
10b.
Expanded view ofKapton
H
film
held
Spin
CoatedSi
WaferScrew-on
Ring
Substrate
Holder
2.1.2
Laser,
Photodiode,
Ammeter
andChart
recorderThe
four
componentslisted
above were usedin
orderto
determine
etch rates and samplethicknesses
.Etch
rates weremeasured
using
laser
interf
erometry
.[23]
Interf
erometry
is
a general
term
that
refersto
measurements of changingintensity
due
to
constructive anddestructive
interference
Xi
patterns(Figure
12).
If
the
pathdifference
between
and
A2
is
anintegral
number of wavelengths,then
the
wavesinterfere
constructively.The
laser
beam
reflects withmaximum
intensity.
If
the
pathdifference
is
an odd numberof
half
wavelengths,then
the
wavesinterfere
destructively
and
the
laser
beam
reflects with minimumintensity.
The
equation:d
=1
/
2n
(3)
gives
the
film
thickness,
d,
between
2
successive maxima or2
successive minima.A
is
the
wavelength ofthe
laser
beam
and n
is
the
index
of refraction ofthe
polymer,d
is
fixed
because
A
and n are constants.The
equationfor
etch rateis
givenby:
Laser
Polymer
Si
Wafer
Figure
12.
Schematic
showing
the techniquewhere v
is
the
speed ofthe
chart paper anddpp
is
the
distance
between
peaks onthe
chart paper.The
thickness,
t,
of a samplethat
is
etched,is
the
product of
the
film
thickness,
d,
between
2
successive peaks(determined
by
equation3)
andthe
total
number ofpeaks,
which
is
taken
directly
offthe
chart paper.The
equationis
given
by:
t
=d
x(tt
of peaks)(5)
A
helium-neon
laser
beam
(5
mW)
with a wavelength of632.8
nm wasdirected
at near normalincidence
ontothe
substrate.
The
beam
wentdown
the
length
ofthe
quartzinjector
tube
afterpassing
through
a polishedPyrex
window.The
windowis
located
atthe
top
ofthe
quartzinjector
tube.
A
vacuumtight
seal was achievedby
using
a1"
Cajon
fitting.
The
male portion ofthe
fitting
was attachedto
the
top
ofthe
quartzinjector
tube.
The
Pyrex
window was placedinside
the
female
portion ofthe
fitting.
Two
Viton
O-rings
were needed, one on either side of
the
window,in
orderfor
a vacuum seal
to
be
achieved whenthe
male andfemale
portion were
brought
together.
The
reflectedlaser
beam
from
the
substrate wasdetected
by
aSpectra
Physics
Photodiode,
Model
tt
404.
The
photodiodewas connected
to
aSpectra
Physic
404
power meter(ammeter).
The
ammeter canbe
variedin
sensitivity
from
0.02
mWto
5.0
One
factor
which affectsreflected
laser
beam
intensity
is
substrate
thickness.
When
thicker
samples were used,
the
reflected
beam
intensity
decreased.
Also,
during
the
courseof some
experiments
whichinvolved
etching,
the
reflectedbeam
intensity
decreased
withtime.
The
observed
decrease
in
intensity
withetching
is
due
to
surface
roughing
ofthe
substrate.
The
rougherthe
surfacebecame
the
less
the
laser beam specularly
reflected;
this
lead
to
adecrease
in
detected
laser beam
intensity.
2.1.3
Pressure
Gauges
A
type
310
BHS-1
Torr
absolute capacitance manometerpressure sensor was used
to
measurethe
reactor chamberpressure.
The
reactor pressureduring
experiments was0.3
torr.
For
a visualdisplay
ofthe
pressure,
the
sensor wasconnected
to
anMKS
Baratron
Type
170-M-270
digital
readoutunit.
A
diaphragm
in
the
pressure sensordeflects
towards
electrodes when
the
reactor chamberis
being
evacuated.This
deflection
causes a changein
the
capacitancebetween
the
diaphragm
and each adjacent electrode onthe
reference side.Sensor
electronics amplifiesthe
signalthat
is
producedby
the
changein
capacitancebetween
the
electrodes andthe
diaphragm.
In
orderto
help
minimizethe
effectsthat
sensor
is
kept
at a constant45
C.
Internal
heaters
whichwere
controlled
by
aDC
proportional
control makethis
possible.
[32]
A
VCR
to
Swagelok
connector
was used
to
matethe
capacitance
manometer
to
a 1/4" stainless steelflexible
tube.
The
tube
in
turn
wasconnected
to
the
reactor chamberusing
a1/4"
stainless
steelultra-torr
male connector.One
end of
the
fitting
wasthreaded
into
the
right-hand sidealuminum
plate.The
threads
were wrapped withteflon
tape
and a
Viton
0-ring
was usedin
orderto
achieve a vacuumtight
sealbetween
the
aluminum plate andthe
ultra-torrfitting.
In
orderto
measurethe
pressurein
the
rangefrom
5x10"
torr
to
lxl0~9torr,
aNRC
524-2
cold cathodeionization
gauge
was used.The
gauge was connectedto
aNRC
855
vacuumionization
gaugecontroller.
The
gauge was attachedto
the
vacuum system
by
using
an0-ring
compression adaptor.2.1.4
Gas
Flow
Readout
Unit
andMass
Flow
Controllers
The
gases usedin
the
experiments were02,
CF4
andAr.
The
gas compositionfor
etching
and removal of passivationexperiments varied
depending
onthe
polymer which wasbeing
studied.
The
gas compositionfor
all passivation experimentschosen
because
they
generatedthe
greatest number ofF
atomsin
the
plasmaaccording
to
spectral
line
intensity
measurements
(Figure
13).
The
total
flow
rate was
52
seemfor
allexperiments.
Gas
flow
rate wascontrolled
by
Tylan
FC-260
massflow
controllers.
Mass
flow
controlis
a means ofmeasuring
andautomatically
controlling
the
weightflow
rate of a gas.A
sensor
tube
externally
wound with2
heated
resistancethermometers
is
usedto
measurethe
gasflow.
A
bridge
circuit senses
the
temperature
differential
anddevelops
alinear
output signal of0
to
5
Vdc
proportionalto
the
gasflow
rate overthe
calibrated range.The
output signalis
then
comparedto
a command voltagefrom
a voltage source.This
comparison generates an error signalthat
altersthe
valve power,
thereby
changing
the
flow
rate untilthe
setpoint
is
reached.[33]
During
the
experiments,the
massflow
controllers were controlled and monitoredby
aTylan
RO-14
readout unit.The
3
massflow
controllers(one
for
each gas) wereconnected
to
1/4" stainless steeltubing.
The
tubing
in
turn
was connected
to
1/4"flexible
stainless steeltubing
whichwas connected
to
the
quartzinjector
tube.
A
1/4"
stainless
steel
Cajon
ultra-torr male connector provided a vacuumtight
sealbetween
the
injector
tube
andthe
flexible
0
E H a P
o rd
o o H
rH LO 4-1
r~ G <1) H O u c < 0 \ u in 3-rr 00 fa u o H CO o in <*H 0 d) c rl 0 +J rl H +J (0
Ul 0 E
C C ui 0 3 (d -p IW pH o Hc
a
aj OJ w > c io <d rl s
rH e o
c n u o rt O -H
E LT) E
0 r-p M O IB H <
<3-M 1 <u rt! -^
J= \ fa u rr o O 1 iw r- (N
0 o
0 fa c rH (fl
M Tl O fl c c (N 05 uj -h
01 M 3 Cn H fa
*T ro OJ rH
2.1.5
Microwave
Source
andMicrowave
Clip-on
Cavity
A
Micro-Now
Instrument,
Model
420B,
2.45
GHz
powersource supplied
the
MW
powerto
anOpthos
Instruments
"Everson"
type
air-cooled clip-on cavity.The
cavity
wasclipped on
to
the
quartzinjector
tube.
The
powersupply,
which
has
an output powerrating
from
0
to
500
watts,
wasconnected
to
the
clip-oncavity
by
means of a coaxial cable.By inductively
tuning
the
clip-on cavity,the
reflectedpower
for
all experiments wasnearly
equal(<
2
watts)to
zero watts.
The
center ofthe
cavity
to
the
center ofthe
injector
tube
was5.3
cm(x-distance
in
Figure
9)
for
allexperiments.
The
difference
between
the
forward
andreflected power was
taken
to
be
the
absorbed power.The
absorbed
MW
powerfor
all experiments wasbetween
58-60
watts .
In
orderto
ensurethat
the
MW
power was stablethroughout
the
course of an experiment,the
power source wasconnected
to
aSola
constant voltage normal-harmonictype
2.1.6
Vacuum
Syste
roThe
vacuum system consisted of a water-cooled,6"
oil
diffusion
pump,
backed
by
aBalzers
Type
DUO
35
mechanicalpump.
Tyreno
12
pump
oil,
whichis
afluorocarbon
oil, wasused
in
the
mechanical pump.Since
0
atoms can reactviolently
with ahydrocarbon
oil,
Tyreno
12