ADVISORYNOTE AN001 2011 pdf

(1)

ADVISORY NOTE

To:

Director of Basic Education Division, Ghana Education

Service

From:

Advisory Unit on Decentralised Education Management,

BED, GES

Document number:

AN004-2011

Date:

27 June 2011

Re: Findings from Document Review on ARPR 2010-11 and ADPR 2010-11

(2)

1. Review of Annual Regional Performance Report 2010/11

Key Findings

1)

Eight regions completely followed the template but AR and BAR only partially did so. The

reporting structure of AR is very confused.

2)

Visions and missions of AR, BAR, ER, and NR are confused. Some visions look like missions

and some missions look like visions.

3)

Figures of the part of indicator analysis in the NR report are shown as one year old figures of

SY2009/10.

4)

Looking at the number of students in primary schools, figures of regional reports of CR, ER,

GAR and WR are identical with EMIS. Other reports showed discrepancy (AR: 0.001%, BAR:

20.2%, NR: 3.5%, UER: 2.3%, UWR: 3.1%, VR: 6.3%).

5)

The reports of BAR, ER and UWR did not analyse results of indicators.

6)

The reports of GAR, NR, UER and WR responded to all reporting requirements while others

omitted some requirements.

7)

No visual aid is used in the reports of NR, UER and VR while others used visual aids effectively

or fairly.

8)

Six regions referred to results of ADEAPs partially, not fully while AR, BAR, NR and VR did not

put any reports on it.

9)

Only UER reported all financial reporting requirements while AR and BAR omitted this part.

Financial reports of other regions are all partial.

10)

The reports of AR, BAR, ER and VR did not report DP activities while others reported partially

or completely.

11)

Only AR and CR showed relevant targets of SY2011/12 while many of the targets of ER, GAR,

NR, UER and WR showed some unusual figures. The reports of BAR, UWR and VR failed to

show the targets, which are crucial for the next annual performance review.

12)

No regions succeeded to show recommendations for the next ADEOPs.

13)

All the regional reports except BAR attached the required detailed data tables as their annex.

14)

As for scoring, WR demonstrated the highest score while the lowest was BAR which was

incomplete as a report.

Recommendations

1)

Inadequate responses on reporting requirements in the regional reports seem to be mainly

because of lack of or late submissions of district reports. It is recommended that all districts

reports be collected one month before the deadline of the regional reports.

2)

The visions and mission of AR, BAR, ER, and NR should be reconsidered.

3)

All the reports should make sure consistency of reported figures with EMIS.

4)

BAR, ER and UWR should make proper analysis on indicators.

5)

NR, UER and VR should start using visual aids in the reports.

6)

Financial reports should not be omitted.

7)

Regional officers should clearly understand how to make proper projection on key indicators.

8)

Regional review process including the regional reports should make utmost attempts to draw

(3)

ARPR scoring results

GHANA DISTRICTS

Q1: Us e of t

he st anda

rd

struc ture?

Q2: V ision

and m ission

appr opria

tely st ated?

Q3: All d ata ac

curat e?

Q4: Q ualit

y of an alysis

on

indicat ors

Q5: M issing

part? Q6: V

isual aid s effe

ctive?

Q7: R esult

s of A DEAP

repo rted?

Q8: F inan

cial in fo rep

orted ?

Q9: A ctiviti

es of DPs r

epor ted?

Q10: T argets

of SY 2011/

12?

Q11: A ny re

com. for n

ext

ADEOP ?

Q12: D etaile

d data attac

hed?

Total S core

% Gener al Rem

arks

Ashanti Region. 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 10 41.7% Mission OK but Vision not appropriate,

reporting structure not well organised (descriptions of different levels mixed together),

Brong Ahafo Region 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 16.7% Looks incomplete,

Central Region 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 2 0 0 16 66.7% Reports of ADEAP not complete, financial data

not accurate, recommendations not specifically for ADEOP,

Eastern Region 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 11 45.8% Vision and mission confused,

Greater Accra Region 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 2 17 70.8% Reports of ADEAP only covered 3 districts

though 9 districts reported their results, financial info not accurate,

Northern Region 2 1 0 2 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 2 13 54.2% Vision and mission confused, data one year old

(2009/10), no outputs and expenditures shown on ADEAPs,

Upper East Region 2 2 1 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 2 16 66.7% Outputs and expenditures confused in ADEAP

results,

Upper West Region 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 11 45.8% ADEAP outputs not shown, some chapters are

not reported,

Volta Region 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 10 41.7%

Western Regions 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 2 18 75.0% No outputs and expenditures reported in

ADEAPs,

Total 18 16 13 11 8 10 6 9 10 9 0 16 126 52.5%

(4)

2. Review of ADPR 2010-11

1. Key findings

2. Recommendations

￮

In total the HQ received reports from 135 districts out of 170. The submission rate was 79.4%. The

lowest was Ashanti (59.3%).

￮

Submission rates should be raised to 100%.

￮

There were 19 districts that did not submit their reports in both opportunities of this time and last

time (January 2011).

￮

These 19 districts need to be visited and asked the reasons why. Penalty for no

submission need to be considered.

￮

Five districts did not use the revised template, of which three are from NR.

￮

Use of the revised template should be enforced.

￮

No district showed complete accuracy of data in their reports. Only one district (Zabzugu/ Tatale in

NR) showed consistent figures with EMIS on primary enrolment. Other 133 districts showed

different figures from EMIS on it. In 63.4% of the districts, both of male and female primary

GER/GAR showed higher or lower values compared to the total GER/GAR.

￮

Districts should be instructed to use EMIS data for their reporting. Use of EMIS database

at the district level should be promoted.

￮

Only 20.9% of the districts reponded to all the guiding questions in the template. Others neglected

some of the reporting requirements.

￮

Regional offices should have time to check whether ADPRs are following the template

or not. Resubmission should be requested if there are missing parts.

￮

14.2% of the districts did not show any analysis on key performance indicators. In GAR the

percentage was 40%.

￮

Training on indicator analysis should be conducted.

￮

One third of the districts did not report results of their ADEAPs though requsted. In AR and NR, the

half did not do so.

￮

Districts should be encouraged to track progress on ADEAP throughout the year.

￮

29.9% of the districts did not report the status of their DEOCs.

￮

Regional offices should monitor activities of DEOCs and warn districts if no action is

taken.

￮

72.4% of the districts did not show budget and expenditures from DACF.

￮

Relationship with DA should be strengthened.

￮

Only 36.9% of the districts showed their recommendations for the next ADEOPs.

￮

This needs to be strongly stressed to establish good management cycle in districts.

￮

As for the total score, UER showed the highest score (65.5%) while VR showed the lowest (48.1%).

79.4%

59.3%

68.2%

76.5%

95.2%

100.0%

77.8%

72.2%

82.4%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Submission rate by region

56.3%

60.9%

60.6%

62.2%

47.1%

56.7%

53.8%

65.5%

60.7%

48.1%

56.3%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Total score by region

Districts that did not submit ADPRs both in January and March

Ashanti Region. 6 Eastern Region 2

Adansi North East Akim Municipal

Asante Akim North Fanteakwa

Atwima Kwanwoma Greater Accra Region 0

Bosomtwe Northern Region 0

Kumasi Metropolitan Upper East Region 0

Kwabre Upper West Region 1

Brong Ahafo Region 3 Wa Municipal

Dormaa East Volta Region 4

Nkoranza North Biakoye District

Sene Hohoe Municipal

Central Region 1 Ketu South

Effutu Municipal Nkwanta North

Western Regions 2

Juaboso

(5)

Comparison of ADPR with EMIS on student enrolment data

1. Total number of district examined:

131 (128 for JHS) out of 170

2. Targeted documents:

ADPR 2010-11, EMIS 2010-11

3. Findings on percentage of gap against ADPR data:

Basic data

Distribution of gaps in percentage

KG

PS

JHS

* around 50% of the districts have less than 5% gaps in KG and PS while the rate is

Mean

12.4%

11.7%

10.3%

around 60% in JHS.

S.D.

22.5%

24.1%

27.9%

* This means that around half of the districts for KG and PS and 40% for JHS have

Lowest

0

0 more than 5% gaps. This must be more than the issue of adjustment of

Highest

189.4%

198.6%

276.2%

non-responding schools.

Agona East -ER Ga South - GAR Chereponi - NR

* Average gaps are around 10%, but some districts have huge gaps.

* These seem to be mainly because of typing errors and wrong summation

of data in ADPRs. Figures in ADPRs need to be carefully checked.

% of districts in each region with more than 20% gaps

(6)

Annex

ANALYSIS ON ENROLMENT TARGETS

ASHANTI REGION

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

KG

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

average

gap btw

ABC

gap btw

CD

F-E

1 GROSS ENROLMENT RATE

94.2%

96.5%

92.0%

94.0%

3.4%

2.0%

1.4%

2 GPI ON GER

1.01

0.00

0.00 3 NET ENROLLMENT RATE

65.3%

58.1%

57.6%

59.6%

3.9%

2.0%

1.9%

4 PUPIL TEACHER RATIO

34

29

32

30

4

2

2 5 % OF TRAINED TEACHERS

41.9%

41.4%

47.3%

50.0%

3.3%

2.7%

0.6%

6 PUPIL CLASSROOM RATIO

IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS

50

55

57

55

3.5

2

1.5 PS

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

7 GROSS ADMISSION RATE

98.9%

96.1%

91.1%

100.0%

3.9%

8.9%

5.0%

8 NET ADMISSION RATE

73.8%

70.4%

68.2%

80.8%

2.8%

12.6%

9.8%

9 GROSS ENROLMENT RATE

93.2%

92.3%

90.4%

107.7%

1.4%

17.3%

15.9%

10 GPI ON GER

0.97

0.98

1.00

0.01

0.02

0.02 11 NET ENROLLMENT RATE

89.4%

82.9%

75.8%

85.6%

6.8%

9.8%

3.0%

12 PUPIL TEACHER RATIO

32

28

28 13 % OF TRAINED TEACHERS

64.9%

64.8%

51.5%

95.0%

6.7%

43.5%

36.8%

14 PUPIL CLASSROOM RATIO

IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS

39

40

42 JHS

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

15 Gross Enrolment Rate

84.2%

82.5%

81.8%

84.0%

1.2%

2.2%

1.0%

16 GPI on GER

0.90

0.93 -

0.03

0.03 17 Net Enrolment Rate

47.8%

49.5%

50.8%

0.9%

1.3%

0.5%

18 Pupil Teacher Ratio

17

14

2 -

2 19 % of trained teachers

81.8%

80.4%

69.2%

71.1%

6.3%

1.9%

4.5%

20 BECE pass rate

80.2%

77.8%

67.7%

2.4%

10.1%

7.7%

21 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

Public school

38

37

36

35

1.0

1.0 -SHS

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

22 Gross Enrolment Rate

41.8%

41.4%

42.0%

45%

0.5%

3.0%

2.5%

23 GPI on GER

NA

24 Net Enrolment Rate

22.6%

24.7%

26.4%

30%

1.9%

3.6%

1.7%

25 Pupil Teacher Ratio

24

23

28

26

3

2

1 26 % of trained teachers

37.4%

37.0%

37.5%

40%

0.4%

2.5%

2.1%

27 SSCE pass rate

60.9%

70%

9.1%

28 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

(7)

BRONG AHAFO REGION

KG

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11 SY2011/12

1 Gross Enrolment Rate

121.9%

127.3%

121.9%

N/A

2 GPI on GER

0.99

0.99 3 Net Enrolment Rate

78.7%

73.9%

78.8%

4 Pupil Teacher Ratio

24 :1

24: 1

23: 1

5 % of trained teachers

21.4

23.5

28.6 6 Pupil Classroom Ratio

39: 1

42: 1

40: 1

PS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11

7 Gross Admission Rate

109. 6%

102.5%

106 :1%

8 Net Admission Rate

87.9%

88.2%

82.9%

9 Gross Enrolment Rate

99.8%

101.0%

99.8%

10 GPI on GER

0.99

0.97

0.96 11 Net Enrolment Rate

95.9%

88:2%

95.9%

12 Pupil Teacher Ratio

34:1

35: 11

33:1

13 % of trained teachers

0.553

0.572

0.558

14 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

public schools

1:26

1: 29

1: 30

JHS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11

15 Gross Enrolment Rate

78.8%

76.4%

83.4%

16 GPI on GER

0.89 0. 89

0.89 17 Net Enrolment Rate

40.8%

47.1%

48.5%

18 Pupil Teacher Ratio

17

17.6

18 19 % of trained teachers

78.2

78.7

73.7 20 BECE pass rate

61

64.7

61.46

21 p

public schools

37

33

30

(8)

CENTRAL REGION

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

KG

2008/09

2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

average

gap btw

CD

F-E

1 GER

111.00% 115.80% 122.00% 122.50%

5.5%

0.5%

5.0%

2 GPI on GER

0.98

0.97

0.99

0.01

0.02

0.02 3 NER

76.00%

69.00%

75.20%

78.50%

6.6%

3.3%

4 PTR

30

37

36

3.5

1.0

2.5 5 % of Trained Teachers

22.20%

21.30%

23.30%

32.00%

1.5%

8.7%

7.3%

6 Pupil Classroom Ratio

in public schools

50

54

47

46

5.5

1.0

4.5 PS

2008/09

2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

7 Gross Admission Rate

112.60% 112.30% 116.80% 117.40%

2.4%

0.6%

1.8%

8 Net Admission Rate

86.40%

78.00%

84.70%

88.90%

7.6%

4.2%

3.3%

9 Gross Enrolment Rate

107.70% 109.20% 115.80% 123.90%

4.1%

8.1%

4.1%

10 GPI on GER

0.97

0.98

0.99

0.01

0.01 11 Net Enrolment Rate

103.60%

96.90%

95.90%

97.10%

3.9%

1.2%

2.7%

12 Pupil Teacher Ratio

32

30

32

35

2.0

3.0

1.0 13 % of Trained Teachers

45.00%

41.90%

41.50%

70.30%

1.8%

28.8%

27.1%

14 Pupil Classroom Ratio

in Public Schools

41

40

41

42

1.0

1.0 -JHS

2008/09

2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

15 Gross Enrolment Rate

97.20%

95.40%

98.40% 100.40%

2.4%

2.0%

0.4%

16 GPI on GER

0.94

0.95

0.96

0.97

0.01

0.01 -17 Net Enrolment Rate

47.80%

57.10%

59.30%

61.0%

5.8%

1.7%

4.1%

18 Pupil Teacher Ratio

36

20

16

25

10.0

9.0

1.0

19 % of trained public

teachers

61.90%

58.80%

61.10%

70.30%

2.7%

9.2%

6.5%

20 BECE pass rate

56.30%

57.00%

51.20%

58.90%

3.3%

7.7%

4.5%

21 Pupil Classroom Ratio

in public schools

35

34

33

35

1.0

2.0

1.0 SHS

2008/09

2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

22 Gross Enrolment Rate

50.10%

56.00%

53.30%

58.60%

4.3%

5.3%

1.0%

23 GPI on GER

0.96

0.98

0.99

0.02 -

0.02 24 Net Enrolment Rate

29.50%

30.60%

36.40%

41.90%

3.5%

5.5%

2.1%

25 Pupil Teacher Ratio

21

19

29

30

6.0

1.0

5.0 26 % of trained teachers

84.40%

82.60%

83.50%

88.50%

1.4%

5.0%

3.7%

27 SSCE pass rate

75.00%

28 Students Classroom

(9)

EASTERN REGION

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

KG

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

average

gap btw

CD

F-E

1 Gross Enrolment Rate

99.30% 100.50% 100.30%

86.00%

0.7%

14.3%

13.6%

2 GPI on GER

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.90

0.01

0.10

0.09 3 Net Enrolment Rate

64.90%

59.70%

59.10%

70%

2.9%

10.9%

8.0%

4 Pupil Teacher Ratio

31

33

31

35

2.0

4.0

2.0 5 % of trained teachers

38.40%

39.40%

41.40%

95%

1.5%

53.6%

52.1%

6 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

public schools

48

50

51

45

1.5

6.0

4.5 PS

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

7 Gross Admission Rate

103.20%

8 Net Admission Rate

9 Gross Enrolment Rate

93.60%

90.10%

88.00% 100.00%

2.8%

12.0%

9.2%

10 GPI on GER

0.97

1 -

0.03

0.03 11 Net Enrolment Rate

86.00%

80.20%

72.30%

90%

6.9%

17.7%

10.9%

12 Pupil Teacher Ratio

29

30

29

45

1.0

16.0

15.0 13 % of trained teachers

59.60%

60.20%

58.20%

95%

1.3%

36.8%

35.5%

14 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

public schools

34

38

45

2.0

7.0

5.0 JHS

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

15 Gross Enrolment Rate

77.40%

73.30%

72.30%

90%

2.6%

17.7%

15.2%

16 GPI on GER

0.93

0.94

1

0.00

0.06

0.06 17 Net Enrolment Rate

43.50%

44.50%

47.50%

90%

2.0%

42.5%

40.5%

18 Pupil Teacher Ratio

16

14

35

1.0

21.0

20.0 19 % of trained teachers

69%

61%

67.30%

95%

7.2%

27.7%

20.6%

20 BECE pass rate

47.40%

53.60%

70%

6.2%

16.4%

10.2%

21 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

public schools

33

32

35

45

2.0

10.0

8.0 SHS

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

22 Gross Enrolment Rate

47.7%

47.6%

51.4%

40%

2.0%

11.4%

9.5%

23 GPI on GER

1.04

1.08

1

0.02

0.08

0.06 24 Net Enrolment Rate

26.3%

26.5%

35%

0.2%

8.5%

8.3%

25 Pupil Teacher Ratio

23

25

30

22

2.0

3.0

1.0 26 % of trained teachers

85.7%

82.8%

84.8%

95%

2.5%

10.2%

7.8%

27 SSCE pass rate

68%

28 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

(10)

GREATER ACCRA REGION

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

KG

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

average

gap btw

CD

F-E

1 Gross Enrolment Rate

55.50%

58.70%

68.70%

75.70%

6.6%

7.0%

0.4%

2 GPI on GER

1

0.99

1

0.01

0.01 3 Net Enrolment Rate

41.20%

33.50%

31.90%

48.30%

4.7%

16.4%

11.8%

4 Pupil Teacher Ratio

31

29

28

30

1.50

2.00

0.50 5 % of Trained Teachers

35.80%

37.20%

40.40%

66.20%

2.3%

25.8%

23.5%

6 Pupil Classroom Ratio

in Public Schools

25

49

57

42

16.00

15.00

1.00 PS

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

7 Gross Admission Rate

84.60%

83.90%

95.10%

97.10%

6.0%

2.0%

4.0%

8 Net Admission Rate

52.20%

57.50%

57.30%

78.90%

2.8%

21.6%

18.9%

9 Gross Enrolment Rate

85.90%

85.80% 101.30%

98.00%

7.8%

3.3%

4.5%

10 GPI on GER

0.98

0.99 -

0.01

0.01 11 Net Enrolment Rate

79.60%

75.80%

67.60%

83.00%

6.0%

15.4%

9.4%

12 Pupil Teacher Ratio

34

30

31

33

2.50

2.00

0.50 13 % of Trained Teachers

58.80%

58.90%

63.60%

74.50%

2.4%

10.9%

8.5%

14 Pupil Classroom Ratio

in Public Schools

54

52

53

38

1.50

15.00

13.50 JHS

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

15 Gross Enrolment Rate

81.20%

78.80%

75.00%

89.40%

3.1%

14.4%

11.3%

16 GPI on GER

0.89

0.91

0.92

0.93

0.02

0.01

0.01 17 Net Enrolment Rate

60.40%

45.20%

40.30%

67.60%

10.1%

27.3%

17.3%

18 Pupil Teacher Ratio

18

15

16

20

2.00

4.00

2.00 19 % of Trained Teachers

67.90%

65.60%

68.60%

80.40%

2.7%

11.8%

9.2%

20 BECE Pass Rate

79.60%

80.00%

75.90%

80.00%

2.3%

4.1%

1.9%

21 Pupil Classroom Ratio

in Public Schools

47

45

48

43

2.50

5.00

2.50 SHS

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

22 Gross Enrolment

Ratio

21.10%

22.00%

20.10%

31.00%

1.4%

10.9%

9.5%

23 GPI on GER

0.74

0.77

0.88

0.02

0.11

0.10 24 Net Enrolment Rate

12.90%

13.40%

15.40%

15.10%

1.3%

0.3%

0.9%

25 Pupil Teacher Ratio

22

21

23

1.50 -

1.50 26 % of Trained Teachers

85.80%

85.30%

83.90%

86.50%

1.0%

2.6%

1.7%

27 SSCE/WASSCE Pass

Rate

34.80%

76.80%

78.50%

78.10%

21.9%

0.4%

21.5%

28 Pupil Classroom Ratio

(11)

NORTHERN REGION

Why 2009/10??

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

KG

SY 2007/08 SY 2008/09 SY 2009/10 SY2011/12

average

gap btw

CD

F-E

1 Gross Enrolment Rate

69.1

76.6

84.6

81.35

7.8

3.3

4.5 2 GPI on GER

0.83

0.87

0.91

0.92

0.04

0.01

0.03 3 Net Enrolment Rate

48.9

51.3

57.5

85.96

4.3

28.5

24.2 4 Pupil Teacher Ratio

43

44

46

41.37

1.5

4.6

3.1 5 % of trained teachers

16%

17%

18%

33%

1.0%

15.0%

14.0%

6 Pupil Classroom Ratio

in public schools

84

85

87

78.64

1.5

8.4

6.9 PS

SY 2007/08 SY 2008/09 SY 2009/10 SY2011/12

7 Gross Admission Rate

115.1

108.9

109.4

73.93

3.3

35.5

32.1 8 Net Admission Rate

69.2

70.4

78.7

63.87

4.8

14.8

10.1 9 Gross Enrolment Rate

92.1

93.5

96

86.01

2.0

10.0

8.0 10 GPI on GER

0.83

0.87

0.02 -

0.02 11 Net Enrolment Rate

71.8

84

82.8

73.93

6.7

8.9

2.2 12 Pupil Teacher Ratio

31

32

29

25.89

2.0

3.1

1.1 13 % of trained teachers

32%

33%

48%

0.5%

15.0%

14.5%

14 Pupil Classroom Ratio

in public schools

45

46

43.54

0.5

2.5

2.0 JHS

SY 2007/08 SY 2008/09 SY 2009/10 SY2011/12

15 Gross Enrolment Rate

66.4

67.4

70.1

84.06

1.8

14.0

12.1 16 GPI on GER

0.8

0.82

0.84

1.11

0.02

0.27

0.25 17 Net Enrolment Rate

40.5

32.9

42.2

70.89

8.5

28.7

20.2 18 Pupil Teacher Ratio

21

19

22.2

1.0

3.2

2.2 19 % of trained teachers

62%

64%

60%

75%

3.0%

15.0%

12.0%

20 BECE pass rate

39.9

39.7

48.73

0.1

9.0

8.9

21 Pupil Classroom Ratio

in public schools

54

52

51

67.64

1.5

16.6

15.1 SHS

SY 2007/08 SY 2008/09 SY 2009/10 SY2011/12

22 Gross Enrolment Rate

24.8

25.5

29.3

31.47

2.3

2.2

0.1 23 GPI on GER

0.61

0.63

0.69

0.74

0.04

0.05

0.01 24 Net Enrolment Rate

10.1

10.5

10.2

10.86

0.35

0.66

0.31 25 Pupil Teacher Ratio

24

23

24

28.98

1.0

5.0

4.0 26 % of trained teachers

82%

86%

73%

81%

8.5%

8.0%

0.5%

27 SSCE pass rate

50%

50% NA

62.20%

-

12%

28 Pupil Classroom Ratio

(12)

UPPER EAST REGION

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

KG

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11 SY2011/12

average

gap btw

ABC

gap btw

CD

F-E

1 Gross Enrolment Rate

70.1

77.1

79.9

84.9

4.9

5.0

0.1 2 GPI on GER

1.01

1

1.01

0.0 -

0.0 3 Net Enrolment Rate

50.5

47.5

52.4

63

4.0

10.7

6.8 4 Pupil Teacher Ratio

59

54

51

45

4.0

6.0

2.0 5 % of trained teachers

20.6

24.8

26.2

43

2.8

17.2

14.4 6 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

80.6

87.8

97

84

8.2

13.0

4.8 PS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11 SY2011/12

7 Gross Admission Rate

106.0

102.3

102.1

97.8

2.0

4.3

2.3 8 Net Admission Rate

59.1

70.9

69.9

67.1

6.4

2.8

3.6 9 Gross Enrolment Rate

94.1

93.8

93

97

0.5

3.5

3.0 10 GPI on GER

1.00

1.11 -

0.1

0.1 11 Net Enrolment Rate

80.7

81.1

72.4

77

4.5

4.4

0.1 12 Pupil Teacher Ratio

48

40

39

4.0

1.0

3.0 13 % of trained teachers

46.7

48.7

40.8

54

5.0

13.6

8.7 14 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

54.8

52

55

53

2.9

2.0

0.9 JHS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11 SY2011/12

15 Gross Enrolment Rate

67.8

74.1

73.7

78

3.3

4.1

0.8 16 GPI on GER

1.1

1.12

1.11

0.0

0.0 -17 Net Enrolment Rate

28.7

49.4

36.5

49.9

16.8

13.4

3.4 18 Pupil Teacher Ratio

23

17

23

24

6.0

1.0

5.0 19 % of trained teachers

67.3

60.6

70.1

76.3

8.1

6.2

1.9 20 BECE pass rate

44.3

29.2

29.3

44.5

7.6

15.2

7.6 21 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

52.5

52

63

59

5.8

4.0

1.8 SHS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11 SY2011/12

22 Gross Enrolment Rate

20.3

22.3

33.8

34.4

6.8

0.6

6.2 23 GPI on GER

0.8

0.77

0.0 24 Net Enrolment Rate

8.3 10 N/A

#VALUE!

25 Pupil Teacher Ratio

19.4

15

24.5

24

7.0

0.5

6.5 26 % of trained teachers

84.2

81.5

64.1

71.8

10.1

7.7

2.4 27 SSCE pass rate

(13)

UPPER WEST REGION

A

B

C

D

KG

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11 SY2011/12

Gross Admission Rate

N.A.

NA

Net Admission Rate

N.A.

Gross Enrolment Rate

76.20%

87.40%

85.80%

GPI on GER

1.03

1.03 Net Enrolment Rate

49.80%

51.50%

51.40%

Pupil Teacher Ratio

47:01:00

45:01:00

41:01:00

% of trained teachers

19.70%

23%

24.60%

Pupil Classroom Ratio in

public schools

69:01:00

76:01:00

98:01:00

PS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11

Gross Admission Rate

118.00%

116.80%

103.10%

Net Admission Rate

51.30%

77.30%

56.70%

Gross Enrolment Rate

100.00%

100.20%

94.20%

GPI on GER

1.04

1.04 Net Enrolment Rate

79.10%

85.80%

75.90%

Pupil Teacher Ratio

42:01:00

37:01:00

42:01:00

% of trained teachers

49.50%

51.00%

60.70%

Pupil Classroom Ratio in

public schools

43:01:00

44:01:00

JHS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11

Gross Admission Rate

85.80%

91.60%

84.90%

Net Admission Rate

28.50%

49.60%

17.00%

Gross Enrolment Rate

78.10%

79.50%

82.90%

GPI on GER

1.07

1.08

1.1 Net Enrolment Rate

34.00%

50.00%

47.10%

Pupil Teacher Ratio

18:01

14:01

19:01

% of trained teachers

64.80%

60.00%

72.40%

BECE pass rate

50.40%

52.80%

Pupil Classroom Ratio in

public schools

37:01:00

42:01:00

SHS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11

Gross Enrolment Rate

25.70%

GPI on GER

0.67

0.69 Net Enrolment Rate

7.80%

8.30%

Pupil Teacher Ratio

23:01

18:01

% of trained teachers

87.90%

88.40%

SSCE pass rate

81.40%

82.60%

(14)

VOLTA REGION

KG

SY 2008/09 SY 2009/10 SY 2010/11 SY2011/12

Gross Enrolment Rate

96.10%

99.90%

102.40% NA

GPI on GER

0.97

0.98

0.96 Net Enrolment Rate

60.40%

60.20%

54.70%

Pupil:Teacher Ratio

33:00:00

34:01:00

33:01:00

% of trained teachers

27.60%

32.00%

30.00%

Pupil:Classroom Ratio in

public schools

48:01:00

44:01:00

41:01:00

PS

SY 2008/09 SY 2009/10 SY 2010/11

Gross Admission Rate

101.90%

98.40%

96.50%

Net Admission Rate

73.50%

70.80%

61.50%

Gross Enrolment Rate

89.70%

89.90%

88.70%

GPI on GER

0.93

0.92

0.93 Net Enrolment Rate

77.90%

83.20%

76.20%

Pupil Teacher Ratio

1:29

1:30

1:28

% of trained teachers

62.70%

60.20%

60.00%

Pupil Classroom Ratio in

public schools

1:32

1:31

1:33

JHS

SY 2008/09 SY 2009/10 SY 2010/11

Gross Admission Rate

78.90%

78.40%

79.30%

Net Admission Rate

45.70%

37.40%

42.80%

Gross Enrolment Rate

73.90%

75.10%

72.60%

GPI on GER

0.89

0.9

0.89 Net Enrolment Rate

50.90%

43.30%

45.90%

Pupil Teacher Ratio

1:16

1:13

% of trained teacher

71.10%

70.8 65.80%

Pupil:classroom Ratio in

Public Schools

30:01:00

29:01:00

27:01:00

SHS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11

Gross Enrolment Rate

32.20%

35.10%

36.10%

GPI on GER

0.85%

0.88%

Net Enrolment Rate

10.90%

15.70%

15.20%

Pupil Teacher Ratio

18:01

19:01

18:01

% of Trained Teachers

77.60%

80.60%

76.90%

SSCE Pass Rate

N/A

Pupil Classroom Ratio in

(15)

WESTERN REGION

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

KG

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11 SY2011/12

average

gap btw

ABC

gap btw

CD

F-E

1 Gross Enrolment Rate

112.70%

117.60%

114.20%

115.00%

4.2%

0.8%

3.4%

2 GPI on GER

0.99

0.98

1

0.01

0.02

0.02 3 Net Enrolment Rate

79.90%

80.00%

77.10%

90.00%

1.5%

12.9%

11.4%

4 Pupil Teacher Ratio

49

45

44

25

2.5

19.0

16.5 5 % of trained teachers

13.40%

16.30%

30%

1.5%

13.7%

12.3%

6 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

public schools

59

58

78

80

10.5

2.0

8.5 PS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11 SY2011/12

7 Gross Admission Rate

105.10%

104.40%

98.90%

100.00%

3.1%

1.1%

2.0%

8 Net Admission Rate

83.80%

81.10%

73.70%

85.00%

5.1%

11.3%

6.3%

9 Gross Enrolment Rate

98.90%

100.30%

98.50%

100.00%

1.6%

1.5%

0.1%

10 GPI on GER

0.96

0.97

1

0.01

0.03

0.03 11 Net Enrolment Rate

96.50%

89.80%

84.20%

95.00%

6.2%

10.8%

4.7%

12 Pupil Teacher Ratio

35

31

36

35

4.5

1.0

3.5 13 % of trained teachers

35.60%

34.10%

35.80%

45.00%

1.6%

9.2%

7.6%

14 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

public schools

41

39

51

60

7.0

9.0

2.0 JHS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11 SY2011/12

15 Gross Enrolment Rate

86.30%

86.40%

83.90%

90.00%

1.3%

6.1%

4.8%

16 GPI on GER

0.93

0.94

1

0.00

0.06

0.06 17 Net Enrolment Rate

50.10%

50.20%

46.30%

50.00%

2.0%

3.7%

1.7%

18 Pupil Teacher Ratio

19

16

19

25

3.0

6.0

3.0 19 % of trained teachers

52.80%

50.00%

52.60%

65.00%

2.7%

12.4%

9.7%

20 BECE pass rate

58.90%

58.70% -

62.50%

0.2%

3.8%

3.6%

21 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

public schools

39

37

49

55

7.0

6.0

1.0 SHS

SY2008/09 SY2009/10 SY2010/11 SY2011/12

22 Gross Enrolment Rate

27.40%

30.20%

28.80%

33.00%

2.1%

4.2%

2.1%

23 GPI on GER

0.85

0.89

0.88

1

0.03

0.12

0.10 24 Net Enrolment Rate

15.20%

16.10%

15.90%

25.00%

0.6%

9.1%

8.6%

25 Pupil Teacher Ratio

23

21

26

30

3.5

4.0

0.5 26 % of Trained Teachers

81.80%

81.30%

81.10%

95.00%

0.3%

13.9%

13.6%

27 Pupil Classroom Ratio in

45.5

49.9

54.4

60

4.5

5.6

1.2

(16)

RESULT OF SCORING

Not Relevant

(Red)

Not Available

(yellow)

Total

Score Score 2<70%

Ashanti

21.4%

7.1%

28.6%

2 Score 1>70%

BAR

NA

0 Score 0 = NA

CR

10.7%

3.6%

14.3%

2 ER

78.6%

3.6%

82.1%

1 GAR

35.7%

0.0%

35.7%

1 NR

57.1%

0.0%

57.1%

1 UER

21.4%

14.3%

35.7%

1 UWR

NA

0 VR

NA

0

(17)

Review of ADPR 2010-11

Q1

: U

se o

f t

he r

ev

ised

tem

pla

te?

Q2

: A

ll d

ata ac

cu

rat

e?

Q3

: A

ll g

uid

ing

qu

es

tio

ns

an

sw

er

ed

?

Q4

: Q

ua

lity

of

an

aly

sis

on

ind

icat

or

s

Q5

: R

esu

lts o

f A

DE

AP

re

po

rte

d?

Q6

: A

ny

re

co

m.

for

ne

xt

ADE

OP

?

To

tal S

co

re

Gen

er

al R

em

ark

s

Ashanti Region.

1 Adansi North

0 2 Adansi South

2

1

2

0

2 8 Highest PTR in PS 148!!, TVET not reported,

3 Afigya-Kwabre new

2

1

2

2 10 TVET not reported, PCRR not calculated (though

possible), highest and lowest PTR confused,

4 Ahafo Ano North

0 5 Ahafo Ano South

2

1

0

0 4 TVET not reported,

6 Amansie Central

0 7 Amansie West

2

1

2

1

0 7 TVET not reported,

8 Asante Akim North Municipal

0 9 Asante Akim South

0 10 Atwima Kwanwoma new

0 11 Atwima Mponua

2

1

2

2 11 PCRR not calculated,

12 Atwima Nwabiagya

2

1

0

1 6 Introduction too long (27p)!, SHS not reported,

13 Bekwai Asante

2

1

2

2 10 No NGO info,

14 Bosome Freho new

2

1

2

2 10 No population data, no TVET,

15 Bosomtwe

0 16 Ejisu-Juaben Municipal

2

1

0

1

6 17 Ejura/ Sekyedumase

0 18 Kumasi Metropolitan

0 19 Kwabre

0 20 Mampong Municipal

0 21 Obuasi Municipal

2

1

0

0 5 No conclusion, no NGO info,

22 Offinso Municipal

2

1

2

1 8 Partially covering Offinso North, no actual

expenditures on ADEAP reported,

23 Offinso North new

2

1

0

0 5 Partially same as Offinso Mncp,

24 Sekyere Afram Plains new

2

1

0

2

0 6 No population data, no analysis on indicators,

25 Sekyere Central new

2

1

2

0 7 No TVET and NFE,

26 Sekyere East

2

1

0

1 6 GER wrong figures,

27 Sekyere South

2

1

2

0

2 8 No financial info,

Actual Score total

32

16

18

20

15

16

117 Full score total

32

192 %

100.0%

50.0%

56.3%

62.5%

46.9%

50.0%

60.9%

Total Number submitted

16 % of submission

59.3%

0 Brong Ahafo Region

0 1 Asunafo North Municipal

2

1

0

0 5 GER/GAR should be %, no financial tables,

2 Asunafo South

2

1

2

0 8 No conclusion section,

3 Asutifi

2

1

0

5 4 Atebubu-Amantin

2

1

2

2 9 No population data, no TVET,

5 Berekum Municipal

2

1

2

2 10 No introduction, no TVET, no NGO info,

6 Dormaa East new

7 Dormaa Municipal

2

1

2

2 10 GER calculation wrong, no NGO info,

8 Jaman North

0

1

0

0 3 Primary enrolment: ADPR7115/EMIS13581,

9 Jaman South

0 10 Kintampo North Municipal

2

1

2

0 7 No population data,

(18)

Review of ADPR 2010-11

Q1

: U

se o

f t

he r

ev

ised

tem

pla

te?

Q2

: A

ll d

ata ac

cu

rat

e?

Q3

: A

ll g

uid

ing

qu

es

tio

ns

an

sw

er

ed

?

Q4

: Q

ua

lity

of

an

aly

sis

on

ind

icat

or

s

Q5

: R

esu

lts o

f A

DE

AP

re

po

rte

d?

Q6

: A

ny

re

co

m.

for

ne

xt

ADE

OP

?

To

tal S

co

re

Gen

er

al R

em

ark

s

15 % of submission

68.2%

Central Region

1 Abura/ Asebu/ Kwamankese

2

1

2

1

2

10 2 Agona East new

2

1

0 6 Population data not for this district,

3 Agona West Municipal

2

1

2

1

0 8 Enrolment rates combined with Agona East

because of lack of population data, no target-result

comparison on indicators, ADEAP results on GOG

budget not reported,

4 Ajumako/ Enyan/ Essiam

0 5 Asikuma/ Odoben/ Brakwa

2

1

2

1

2

10 6 Assin North Municipal

2

1

0 6 ADEAP results on GOG budget not reported,

7 Assin South

0

1

0

0 2 Using old template, analysing one year old data,

8 Awutu-Senya new

0 9 Cape Coast Metropolitan

2

1

2

1

2 9 Introduction too long (7p out of 33P),

10 Effutu Municipal

0 11 Gomoa East new

2

1

2

2 11 Access data combined with Gomoa West,

12 Gomoa West

2

1

2

1

2 9 PCRR misunderstood, spent amount on ADEAP too

low (only 23000 cedis),

13 Komenda/ Edina/ Eguafo/ Abirem

2

1

2

0

7 14 Mfantseman Municipal

0 15 Twifo/ Heman/ Lower Denkyira

2

1

0

2

2 8 GER calculation misunderstood,

16 Upper Denkyira East Municipal

2

1

0 6 ADEAP results on GOG budget not reported,

enrolment figures same as UDW but not

mentioned,

17 Upper Denkyira West new

2

1

0

0 5 Analysis of indicators exactly same as UDE,

conclusion same as UDE,

Actual Score total

24

13

19

13

16

12

97 Full score total

26

156 %

92.3%

50.0%

73.1%

50.0%

61.5%

46.2%

62.2%

Total Number submitted

13 % of submission

76.5%

Eastern Region

1 Akuapim North

2

1

2

8 2 Akuapim South Municipal

2

1

0 6 Expenditures on ADEAP mostly not reported,

3 Akyemansa new

2

1

2

0

7 4 Asuogyaman

2

1

0

0 5 Chap of dstrict levies still remained,

5 Atiwa

2

1

0

0 3 Chap of dstrict levies still remained, wrong

calculation of enrolment rates,

6 Birim Central Municipal

2

1

2

0

7 7 Birim North new

2

1

2 8 Seems not to know PCRR formula, no NGO reports,

8 Birim South new

2

0

1

0

0 3 Primary enrolment and analysis of indictors exactly

same as Brim Central,

9 East Akim Municipal

0

1

0

0 1 Regional template used by mistake

10 Fanteakwa

0 11 Kwaebibirem

2

1

0

0 5 Introduction too long (24p),

12 Kwahu East new

2

1

0

0 5 No target-result comparison,

13 Kwahu North

2

1

0 6 No target-result comparison, "achived result 100%"

does not make sense,

14 Kwahu South

2

1

2

0 7 No target-result comparison,

15 Kwahu West Municipal

2

1

0

2

0 6 No report on NFE, "happy" is not result, no NGO

report,

16 Lower Manya Krobo

2

1

0 6 Population data wrong, no target-result

comparison,

17 New-Juaben Municipal

2

1

0

2

0 6 No overview of district, seems not to know PCRR

formula, no conclusion,

18 Suhum/ Kraboa/ Coaltar

2

1

0

0 5 GAR almost 200%!,

(19)

Review of ADPR 2010-11

Q1

: U

se o

f t

he r

ev

ised

tem

pla

te?

Q2

: A

ll d

ata ac

cu

rat

e?

Q3

: A

ll g

uid

ing

qu

es

tio

ns

an

sw

er

ed

?

Q4

: Q

ua

lity

of

an

aly

sis

on

ind

icat

or

s

Q5

: R

esu

lts o

f A

DE

AP

re

po

rte

d?

Q6

: A

ny

re

co

m.

for

ne

xt

ADE

OP

?

To

tal S

co

re

Gen

er

al R

em

ark

s

20 West Akim Municipal

2

1

0 6 "successful" is not appropriate for achieved results,

ADEAP results only on DFID,

21 Yilo Krobo

2

1

2

0

7 Actual Score total

38

19

18

15

19

4

113 Full score total

40

240 %

95.0%

47.5%

45.0%

37.5%

47.5%

10.0%

47.1%

Total Number submitted

20 % of submission

95.2%

Greater Accra Region

1 Accra Metropolitan

2

1

0

0 4 District levies still kept, no financial report,

2 Adenta municipal new

2

1

2

1

2

2 10 No population figures,

3 Ashaiman municipal new

2

1

2

1

2 9 EMIS figure is half, ADEAP results only on DFID,

financial report wrong,

4 Dangme East

2

1

0 6 Age 6 population seems wrong, "activity carried

out" is not result,

5 Dangme West

2

1

0

0 5 Population data so different from emis,

6 Ga East Municipal

2

1

2

1

2 9 "implemented" is not result,

7 Ga West Municipal

2

1

0

1

0 5 No target-result comparison, no population data,

8 Ga South (Weija) municipal

2

1

2

0 7 Primary enrolment so different from emis, no

population data,

9 Ledzekuku-Krowor municipal new

2

1

0

1

0 5 Primary enrolment so different from emis, no

population data, seems not to know PCRR formula,

"successful" is not appropriate for achieved results,

10 Tema Metropolitan

2

1

2

0

1

2 8 Primary enrolment so different from emis, "100%"

is not achieved result.

Actual Score total

20

10

14

6

10

8

68 Full score total

20

120 %

100.0%

50.0%

70.0%

30.0%

50.0%

40.0%

56.7%

Total Number submitted

10 % of submission

100.0%

Northern Region

1 Bole

1

0

0 4 Structure not followed, male GAR/GER not shown,

2 Bunkpurugu-Yunyoo

2

1

0

0 5 GAR too low, primary PCRR too high, no

conclusion,

3 Central Gonja

2

1

2

2 9 2010/11 figures seem not actual, no target-result

comparison, 2011-12 targets available though not

required,

4 Chereponi new

2

1

0

0 5 2011-12 targets available though not required, why

targets %?,