• No results found

Age related changes in interlimb coordination

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Age related changes in interlimb coordination"

Copied!
139
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1.1 Frequency Deviation

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 [GROUP x TASK x LIMB x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA

Coding

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Task: 1= single task, 2= dual task

Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Frequency: 1= 20%, 2= 60%, 3= 100% of CF

(2)

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error LC LC*group Error TASK TASK*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LC*TASK LC*TASK*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*TASK LIMB*LC*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*TASK*FREQ LC*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*TASK*FREQ

1.88279 1 1.882786 6.72184 0.016614

0.06725 1 0.067255 0.24011 0.628978 6.16220 22 0.280100

0.00000 1 0.000000 0.00000 0.999404 0.00039 1 0.000389 0.14147 0.710431 0.06045 22 0.002748

0.00774 1 0.007742 0.27062 0.608113 0.04855 1 0.048551 1.69711 0.206138 0.62938 22 0.028608

0.24162 1 0.241617 13.86102 0.001182

0.03039 1 0.030394 1.74365 0.200250 0.38349 22 0.017431

12.70174 2 6.350868 43.38386 0.000000 1.75090 2 0.875449 5.98034 0.005041

6.44106 44 0.146388

0.00236 1 0.002361 0.89044 0.355607 0.00098 1 0.000982 0.37029 0.549081 0.05833 22 0.002651

0.00019 1 0.000187 0.07092 0.792480 0.00022 1 0.000223 0.08462 0.773852 0.05786 22 0.002630

0.01144 1 0.011435 1.05711 0.315047 0.00126 1 0.001258 0.11629 0.736324 0.23799 22 0.010818

0.01111 2 0.005553 4.87480 0.012238

0.00093 2 0.000467 0.41010 0.666094 0.05012 44 0.001139

0.00912 2 0.004562 0.35067 0.706164 0.02973 2 0.014864 1.14259 0.328274 0.57240 44 0.013009

0.02896 2 0.014480 1.41940 0.252716 0.03283 2 0.016417 1.60926 0.211586 0.44887 44 0.010202

0.00054 1 0.000543 0.23114 0.635426 0.00057 1 0.000566 0.24083 0.628469 0.05171 22 0.002350

0.00714 2 0.003572 2.81407 0.070786 0.00144 2 0.000720 0.56716 0.571226 0.05586 44 0.001269

0.00980 2 0.004902 4.06562 0.023977

0.00151 2 0.000753 0.62417 0.540383 0.05305 44 0.001206

0.00859 2 0.004295 0.59167 0.557747 0.00047 2 0.000235 0.03232 0.968218 0.31937 44 0.007258

(3)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p

-i -d f -d f -d p

H-F Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr Adj

LIMB LIMB*group Error LC LC*group Error TASK TASK*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LC*TASK LC*TASK*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*TASK LIMB*LC*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*TASK*FREQ LC*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*TASK*FREQ LIMB*LC*TASK*FREQ*group Error

1 0.00000 0.999404 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.999404 1.000000 1.000000 22. 1 0.14147 0.710431 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.710431 1.000000 1.000000 22. 22

1 0.27062 0.608113 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.608113 1.000000 1.000000 22. 1 1.69711 0.206138 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.206138 1.000000 1.000000 22. 22

1 13.86102 0.001182 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.001182 1.000000 1.000000 22.

1 1.74365 0.200250 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.200250 1.000000 1.000000 22. 22

2 43.38386 0.000000 0.619858 1.239716 27.27374 0.000000 0.500000 1.000000 22. 2 5.98034 0.005041 0.619858 1.239716 27.27374 0.015921 0.500000 1.000000 22.

44

1 0.89044 0.355607 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.355607 1.000000 1.000000 22. 1 0.37029 0.549081 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.549081 1.000000 1.000000 22. 22

1 0.07092 0.792480 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.792480 1.000000 1.000000 22. 1 0.08462 0.773852 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.773852 1.000000 1.000000 22. 22

1 1.05711 0.315047 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.315047 1.000000 1.000000 22. 1 0.11629 0.736324 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.736324 1.000000 1.000000 22. 22

2 4.87480 0.012238 0.640886 1.281772 28.19898 0.027601 0.500000 1.000000 22.

2 0.41010 0.666094 0.640886 1.281772 28.19898 0.577341 0.500000 1.000000 22. 44

2 0.35067 0.706164 1.000000 2.000000 44.00000 0.706164 0.500000 1.000000 22. 2 1.14259 0.328274 1.000000 2.000000 44.00000 0.328274 0.500000 1.000000 22. 44

2 1.41940 0.252716 0.899788 1.799577 39.59069 0.253303 0.500000 1.000000 22. 2 1.60926 0.211586 0.899788 1.799577 39.59069 0.214257 0.500000 1.000000 22. 44

1 0.23114 0.635426 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.635426 1.000000 1.000000 22. 1 0.24083 0.628469 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.628469 1.000000 1.000000 22. 22

2 2.81407 0.070786 0.631950 1.263901 27.80582 0.096876 0.500000 1.000000 22. 2 0.56716 0.571226 0.631950 1.263901 27.80582 0.496663 0.500000 1.000000 22. 44

2 4.06562 0.023977 0.661026 1.322053 29.08516 0.042758 0.500000 1.000000 22. 2 0.62417 0.540383 0.661026 1.322053 29.08516 0.478833 0.500000 1.000000 22. 44

2 0.59167 0.557747 0.962514 1.925029 42.35063 0.551704 0.500000 1.000000 22. 2 0.03232 0.968218 0.962514 1.925029 42.35063 0.964616 0.500000 1.000000 22. 44

2 4.24834 0.020562 0.652862 1.305725 28.72595 0.038842 0.500000 1.000000 22. 2 0.33241 0.718977 0.652862 1.305725 28.72595 0.627481 0.500000 1.000000 22. 44

(4)

TASK; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 22)=13.861, p=.00118 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

TASK -0.3

-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2

DV

_

1

FREQ; LS Means

Current effect: F(2, 44)=43.384, p=.00000 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2 3

FREQ -0.7

-0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

DV

_

1

(5)

FREQ*group; LS Means

Current effect: F(2, 44)=5.9803, p=.00504 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2

1 2 3

FREQ -0.9

-0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

DV

_

1

LIMB*FREQ; LS Means

Current effect: F(2, 44)=4.8748, p=.01224 Effective hypothesis decompo sition Vertical bars den ote 0.95 confidence intervals

LIMB 1 LIMB

2

1 2 3

FREQ -0.6

-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2

DV

_

1

(6)

LIMB*T ASK*F REQ; L S Mea ns Current effect: F(2, 44)=4.0656, p=.02398

Effective hypothesis decompo sition Vertica l ba rs den ote 0.95 confiden ce inter vals

LIMB 1 LIMB

2 TASK: 1

FREQ: 1

2

3 -0.5

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

DV

_

1

TASK: 2 FREQ:

1

2

3

LIMB*LC*TASK*FREQ; LS Means Current effect: F(2, 44)=4.2483, p=.02056

Effective hypothesis decompo sition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals

LC 1 LC

2 TASK: 1

FREQ: 1

2

3 -0.5

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

DV

_

1

TASK: 2 FREQ:

1

2

3

Factors: Levels LIMB: 1

(7)

LIMB*LC*TASK*FREQ; LS Means Current effect: F(2, 44)=4.2483, p=.02056

Effective hypothesis decompo sition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals

LC 1 LC

2 TASK: 1

FREQ: 1

2

3 -0.5

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

DV

_

1

TASK: 2 FREQ:

1

2

3

Factors: Levels LIMB: 2

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .14639, df = 44.000

Cell No.

FREQ {1} .06643

{2} .02806

{3} -.2660 1

2 3

1 0.591550 0.000130

2 0.591550 0.000130

3 0.000130 0.000130

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02387, df = 59.515

Cell No.

group FREQ {1} .11136

{2} .03661

{3} -.3519

{4} .02151

{5} .01950

{6} -.1801 1

2 3 4 5 6

1 1 0.753671 0.000139 0.843247 0.692795 0.000418

1 2 0.753671 0.000139 0.999897 0.999916 0.013300

1 3 0.000139 0.000139 0.000135 0.000135 0.256520 2 1 0.843247 0.999897 0.000135 1.000000 0.008592

2 2 0.692795 0.999916 0.000135 1.000000 0.009520

2 3 0.000418 0.013300 0.256520 0.008592 0.009520

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00114, df = 44.000

Cell No.

LIMB FREQ {1} .06492

{2} .02360

{3} -.2600

{4} .06795

{5} .03251

{6} -.2720 1

2 3 4 5 6

1 1 0.000139 0.000139 0.988893 0.000140 0.000139

1 2 0.000139 0.000139 0.000139 0.458287 0.000139

1 3 0.000139 0.000139 0.000139 0.000139 0.160946 2 1 0.988893 0.000139 0.000139 0.000139 0.000139

2 2 0.000140 0.458287 0.000139 0.000139 0.000139

(8)

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00121, df = 44.000

Cell No.

LIMB TASK FREQ {1} .03629 {2} .01054 {3} -.2781 {4} .09356 {5} .03666 {6} -.2420 {7} .03642 {8} .00921 {9} -.2803 {10} .09948 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 1 1 0.031249 0.000126 0.000126 1.000000 0.000126 1.000000 0.018825 0.000126 0.000126

1 1 2 0.031249 0.000126 0.000126 0.027208 0.000126 0.029767 1.000000 0.000126 0.000126

1 1 3 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000513 0.000126 0.000126 1.000000 0.000126

1 2 1 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.999406 1 2 2 1.000000 0.027208 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 1.000000 0.016300 0.000126 0.000126

1 2 3 0.000126 0.000126 0.000513 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000250 0.000126

2 1 1 1.000000 0.029767 0.000126 0.000126 1.000000 0.000126 0.017900 0.000126 0.000126

2 1 2 0.018825 1.000000 0.000126 0.000126 0.016300 0.000126 0.017900 0.000126 0.000126

2 1 3 0.000126 0.000126 1.000000 0.000126 0.000126 0.000250 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126

2 2 1 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.999406 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126

2 2 2 0.234573 0.000129 0.000126 0.000291 0.258649 0.000126 0.242828 0.000127 0.000126 0.000133

2 2 3 0.000126 0.000126 0.669674 0.000126 0.000126 0.125889 0.000126 0.000126 0.461892 0.000126

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00121, df = 44.000

Cel

LIMB LC TASK FREQ {1} .03649 {2} -.0024 {3} -.2929 {4} .09240 {5} .03015 {6} -.2409 {7} .03608 {8} .02345 {9} -.2632 {10} .09471 {11} .04316 {12} -.2430 {13} .03786 {14} -.003 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

1 1 1 1 0.051 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.04

1 1 1 2 0.051 0.000 0.000 0.219 0.000 0.057 0.625 0.000 0.000 0.008 0.000 0.036 1.00

1 1 1 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.368 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.00

1 1 2 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.003 0.000 0.001 0.00

1 1 2 2 1.000 0.219 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.19

1 1 2 3 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.840 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.00

1 2 1 1 1.000 0.057 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.04

1 2 1 2 1.000 0.625 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.940 0.000 0.998 0.58

1 2 1 3 0.000 0.000 0.368 0.000 0.000 0.840 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.926 0.000 0.00

1 2 2 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.00

1 2 2 2 1.000 0.008 0.000 0.003 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.940 0.000 0.001 0.000 1.000 0.00

1 2 2 3 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.926 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00

2 1 1 1 1.000 0.036 0.000 0.001 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.998 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.03

2 1 1 2 0.044 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.194 0.000 0.049 0.583 0.000 0.000 0.007 0.000 0.031

2 1 1 3 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.506 0.000 0.000 0.004 0.000 0.00

2 1 2 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00

2 1 2 2 0.055 0.000 0.000 0.984 0.010 0.000 0.049 0.001 0.000 0.943 0.245 0.000 0.077 0.00

2 1 2 3 0.000 0.000 0.971 0.000 0.000 0.172 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.261 0.000 0.00

2 2 1 1 1.000 0.075 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.06 2 2 1 2 0.997 0.761 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.998 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.865 0.000 0.991 0.72

2 2 1 3 0.000 0.000 0.798 0.000 0.000 0.417 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.557 0.000 0.00

2 2 2 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.00

2 2 2 2 1.000 0.051 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.04

2 2 2 3 0.000 0.000 0.036 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.00

group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.24011, p=.62898

Effective hypothesis decomposition

(9)

LIMB; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.00000, p=.99940

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 -0.057171 0.021651 -0.102072 -0.012270 24 2 -0.057174 0.022657 -0.104163 -0.010186 24

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.14147, p=.71043

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 -0.068798 0.030619 -0.132298 -0.005298 12 1 2 -0.067159 0.032042 -0.133610 -0.000707 12 2 1 -0.045544 0.030619 -0.109044 0.017956 12 2 2 -0.047190 0.032042 -0.113642 0.019261 12

LC; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.27062, p=.60811

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 -0.060839 0.022160 -0.106797 -0.014881 24 2 -0.053507 0.024100 -0.103487 -0.003526 24

LC*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=1.6971, p=.20614

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 -0.080826 0.031340 -0.145820 -0.015831 12 1 2 -0.055131 0.034083 -0.125815 0.015552 12 2 1 -0.040852 0.031340 -0.105847 0.024142 12 2 2 -0.051882 0.034083 -0.122565 0.018802 12

TASK; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=13.861, p=.00118

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 -0.077654 0.019851 -0.118823 -0.036485 24 2 -0.036692 0.025279 -0.089117 0.015733 24

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=1.7437, p=.20025

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 -0.095724 0.028074 -0.153946 -0.037501 12 1 2 -0.040233 0.035750 -0.114373 0.033907 12 2 1 -0.059584 0.028074 -0.117806 -0.001362 12 2 2 -0.033150 0.035750 -0.107290 0.040990 12

(10)

FREQ; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=43.384, p=.00000

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3

1 0.066435 0.013876 0.037658 0.095212 24 2 0.028055 0.019411 -0.012202 0.068312 24 3 -0.266008 0.049136 -0.367911 -0.164106 24

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=5.9803, p=.00504

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 1 0.111362 0.019624 0.070665 0.152059 12 1 2 0.036606 0.027452 -0.020326 0.093538 12 1 3 -0.351903 0.069489 -0.496015 -0.207791 12 2 1 0.021507 0.019624 -0.019189 0.062204 12 2 2 0.019505 0.027452 -0.037427 0.076436 12 2 3 -0.180113 0.069489 -0.324225 -0.036001 12

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.89044, p=.35561

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 -0.062862 0.021182 -0.106791 -0.018932 24 1 2 -0.051480 0.023902 -0.101051 -0.001910 24 2 1 -0.058816 0.023882 -0.108344 -0.009288 24 2 2 -0.055533 0.024309 -0.105947 -0.005119 24

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.37029, p=.54908

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 -0.084975 0.029956 -0.147101 -0.022850 12 1 1 2 -0.052621 0.033803 -0.122724 0.017482 12 1 2 1 -0.076676 0.033774 -0.146719 -0.006632 12 1 2 2 -0.057641 0.034378 -0.128938 0.013655 12 2 1 1 -0.040748 0.029956 -0.102874 0.021378 12 2 1 2 -0.050340 0.033803 -0.120443 0.019764 12 2 2 1 -0.040956 0.033774 -0.111000 0.029087 12 2 2 2 -0.053424 0.034378 -0.124720 0.017872 12

LIMB*TASK; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.07092, p=.79248

Effective hypothesis decomposition

LIMB TASK DV_1 DV_1 DV_1 DV_1 N

(11)

LIMB*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.08462, p=.77385

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 -0.095353 0.028161 -0.153755 -0.036950 12 1 1 2 -0.042244 0.034659 -0.114123 0.029635 12 1 2 1 -0.096094 0.028014 -0.154192 -0.037997 12 1 2 2 -0.038223 0.037788 -0.116591 0.040146 12 2 1 1 -0.058813 0.028161 -0.117216 -0.000411 12 2 1 2 -0.032275 0.034659 -0.104154 0.039604 12 2 2 1 -0.060355 0.028014 -0.118452 -0.002257 12 2 2 2 -0.034026 0.037788 -0.112394 0.044343 12

LC*TASK; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=1.0571, p=.31505

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 -0.085776 0.019474 -0.126163 -0.045389 24 1 2 -0.035902 0.026154 -0.090142 0.018337 24 2 1 -0.069532 0.022628 -0.116459 -0.022605 24 2 2 -0.037481 0.027653 -0.094831 0.019868 24

LC*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.11629, p=.73632

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 -0.111549 0.027541 -0.168664 -0.054433 12 1 1 2 -0.050103 0.036987 -0.126809 0.026604 12 1 2 1 -0.079899 0.032000 -0.146263 -0.013534 12 1 2 2 -0.030364 0.039108 -0.111469 0.050741 12 2 1 1 -0.060003 0.027541 -0.117118 -0.002887 12 2 1 2 -0.021702 0.036987 -0.098408 0.055004 12 2 2 1 -0.059165 0.032000 -0.125530 0.007199 12 2 2 2 -0.044599 0.039108 -0.125703 0.036506 12

LIMB*FREQ; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=4.8748, p=.01224

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 1 0.064921 0.013295 0.037348 0.092493 24 1 2 0.023599 0.017815 -0.013347 0.060546 24 1 3 -0.260034 0.049282 -0.362238 -0.157829 24 2 1 0.067949 0.014572 0.037727 0.098170 24 2 2 0.032511 0.021875 -0.012855 0.077877 24 2 3 -0.271983 0.049052 -0.373711 -0.170255 24

(12)

LIMB*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=.41010, p=.66609

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 1 1 0.108030 0.018802 0.069037 0.147023 12 1 1 2 0.030527 0.025195 -0.021723 0.082778 12 1 1 3 -0.344952 0.069695 -0.489491 -0.200414 12 1 2 1 0.114694 0.020608 0.071954 0.157433 12 1 2 2 0.042685 0.030936 -0.021472 0.106842 12 1 2 3 -0.358854 0.069370 -0.502719 -0.214990 12 2 1 1 0.021811 0.018802 -0.017182 0.060804 12 2 1 2 0.016672 0.025195 -0.035579 0.068922 12 2 1 3 -0.175115 0.069695 -0.319653 -0.030576 12 2 2 1 0.021203 0.020608 -0.021536 0.063943 12 2 2 2 0.022338 0.030936 -0.041819 0.086494 12 2 2 3 -0.185112 0.069370 -0.328976 -0.041247 12

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=.35067, p=.70616

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 1 0.067320 0.013517 0.039287 0.095353 24 1 2 0.024981 0.021418 -0.019437 0.069399 24 1 3 -0.274818 0.050698 -0.379960 -0.169676 24 2 1 0.065549 0.014926 0.034595 0.096504 24 2 2 0.031129 0.023558 -0.017726 0.079985 24 2 3 -0.257199 0.050467 -0.361862 -0.152536 24

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=1.1426, p=.32827

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 1 1 0.112420 0.019116 0.072776 0.152065 12 1 1 2 0.023108 0.030289 -0.039708 0.085925 12 1 1 3 -0.378005 0.071698 -0.526699 -0.229312 12 1 2 1 0.110304 0.021108 0.066528 0.154080 12 1 2 2 0.050104 0.033316 -0.018989 0.119196 12 1 2 3 -0.325801 0.071372 -0.473817 -0.177785 12 2 1 1 0.022219 0.019116 -0.017425 0.061864 12 2 1 2 0.026854 0.030289 -0.035962 0.089671 12 2 1 3 -0.171631 0.071698 -0.320324 -0.022937 12 2 2 1 0.020795 0.021108 -0.022981 0.064571 12 2 2 2 0.012155 0.033316 -0.056938 0.081247 12 2 2 3 -0.188596 0.071372 -0.336612 -0.040580 12

(13)

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=1.4194, p=.25272

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 1 0.036351 0.011083 0.013365 0.059336 24 1 2 0.009875 0.016380 -0.024094 0.043844 24 1 3 -0.279187 0.048052 -0.378840 -0.179534 24 2 1 0.096519 0.017456 0.060317 0.132721 24 2 2 0.046235 0.025056 -0.005727 0.098198 24 2 3 -0.252829 0.052240 -0.361167 -0.144491 24

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=1.6093, p=.21159

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 1 1 0.066430 0.015674 0.033924 0.098936 12 1 1 2 0.008444 0.023164 -0.039595 0.056484 12 1 1 3 -0.362045 0.067955 -0.502976 -0.221114 12 1 2 1 0.156294 0.024687 0.105097 0.207491 12 1 2 2 0.064768 0.035434 -0.008718 0.138254 12 1 2 3 -0.341761 0.073878 -0.494975 -0.188548 12 2 1 1 0.006271 0.015674 -0.026235 0.038777 12 2 1 2 0.011306 0.023164 -0.036733 0.059346 12 2 1 3 -0.196329 0.067955 -0.337260 -0.055398 12 2 2 1 0.036744 0.024687 -0.014453 0.087941 12 2 2 2 0.027703 0.035434 -0.045783 0.101189 12 2 2 3 -0.163897 0.073878 -0.317110 -0.010684 12

LIMB*LC*TASK; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.23114, p=.63543

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 -0.086258 0.019706 -0.127126 -0.045391 24 1 1 2 -0.039465 0.024402 -0.090071 0.011140 24 1 2 1 -0.067908 0.022591 -0.114758 -0.021057 24 1 2 2 -0.035053 0.027350 -0.091773 0.021667 24 2 1 1 -0.085293 0.019307 -0.125333 -0.045253 24 2 1 2 -0.032339 0.030202 -0.094975 0.030297 24 2 2 1 -0.071156 0.022678 -0.118188 -0.024124 24 2 2 2 -0.039909 0.027978 -0.097932 0.018113 24

(14)

LIMB*LC*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.24083, p=.62847

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 -0.112545 0.027868 -0.170341 -0.054750 12 1 1 1 2 -0.057406 0.034509 -0.128973 0.014162 12 1 1 2 1 -0.078160 0.031948 -0.144417 -0.011903 12 1 1 2 2 -0.027082 0.038678 -0.107296 0.053132 12 1 2 1 1 -0.110552 0.027304 -0.167177 -0.053927 12 1 2 1 2 -0.042800 0.042713 -0.131380 0.045781 12 1 2 2 1 -0.081637 0.032072 -0.148150 -0.015124 12 1 2 2 2 -0.033646 0.039566 -0.115702 0.048410 12 2 1 1 1 -0.059971 0.027868 -0.117767 -0.002176 12 2 1 1 2 -0.021525 0.034509 -0.093092 0.050042 12 2 1 2 1 -0.057656 0.031948 -0.123912 0.008601 12 2 1 2 2 -0.043024 0.038678 -0.123238 0.037190 12 2 2 1 1 -0.060034 0.027304 -0.116660 -0.003409 12 2 2 1 2 -0.021879 0.042713 -0.110460 0.066702 12 2 2 2 1 -0.060675 0.032072 -0.127188 0.005838 12 2 2 2 2 -0.046173 0.039566 -0.128229 0.035883 12

LIMB*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=2.8141, p=.07079

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 1 1 0.064447 0.012107 0.039339 0.089554 24 1 1 2 0.013893 0.016986 -0.021334 0.049121 24 1 1 3 -0.266926 0.051525 -0.373781 -0.160070 24 1 2 1 0.065394 0.014984 0.034321 0.096468 24 1 2 2 0.033306 0.023500 -0.015431 0.082042 24 1 2 3 -0.253141 0.049826 -0.356473 -0.149809 24 2 1 1 0.070193 0.015312 0.038438 0.101948 24 2 1 2 0.036069 0.028310 -0.022642 0.094780 24 2 1 3 -0.282710 0.050066 -0.386540 -0.178881 24 2 2 1 0.065705 0.014908 0.034786 0.096623 24 2 2 2 0.028953 0.023622 -0.020035 0.077941 24 2 2 3 -0.261256 0.051126 -0.367284 -0.155227 24

(15)

LIMB*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=.56716, p=.57123

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

1 1 1 1 0.106403 0.017121 0.070896 0.141911 12 1 1 1 2 0.007166 0.024022 -0.042653 0.056985 12 1 1 1 3 -0.368496 0.072867 -0.519612 -0.217379 12 1 1 2 1 0.109657 0.021190 0.065712 0.153602 12 1 1 2 2 0.053889 0.033234 -0.015035 0.122812 12 1 1 2 3 -0.321409 0.070464 -0.467543 -0.175275 12 1 2 1 1 0.118437 0.021654 0.073528 0.163345 12 1 2 1 2 0.039051 0.040036 -0.043979 0.122080 12 1 2 1 3 -0.387515 0.070803 -0.534352 -0.240678 12 1 2 2 1 0.110951 0.021084 0.067226 0.154675 12 1 2 2 2 0.046319 0.033406 -0.022961 0.115598 12 1 2 2 3 -0.330194 0.072303 -0.480141 -0.180247 12 2 1 1 1 0.022490 0.017121 -0.013017 0.057998 12 2 1 1 2 0.020621 0.024022 -0.029199 0.070440 12 2 1 1 3 -0.165356 0.072867 -0.316472 -0.014239 12 2 1 2 1 0.021132 0.021190 -0.022813 0.065077 12 2 1 2 2 0.012722 0.033234 -0.056201 0.081646 12 2 1 2 3 -0.184874 0.070464 -0.331007 -0.038740 12 2 2 1 1 0.021949 0.021654 -0.022960 0.066857 12 2 2 1 2 0.033088 0.040036 -0.049942 0.116117 12 2 2 1 3 -0.177906 0.070803 -0.324743 -0.031068 12 2 2 2 1 0.020458 0.021084 -0.023266 0.064183 12 2 2 2 2 0.011588 0.033406 -0.057692 0.080867 12 2 2 2 3 -0.192318 0.072303 -0.342265 -0.042371 12

LIMB*TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=4.0656, p=.02398

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 1 1 0.036285 0.011043 0.013383 0.059188 24 1 1 2 0.010543 0.016428 -0.023526 0.044613 24 1 1 3 -0.278078 0.048272 -0.378188 -0.177968 24 1 2 1 0.093556 0.016250 0.059855 0.127256 24 1 2 2 0.036656 0.021907 -0.008776 0.082087 24 1 2 3 -0.241989 0.052627 -0.351131 -0.132847 24 2 1 1 0.036416 0.011143 0.013307 0.059525 24 2 1 2 0.009207 0.016339 -0.024677 0.043091 24 2 1 3 -0.280296 0.047885 -0.379604 -0.180988 24 2 2 1 0.099482 0.018972 0.060135 0.138828 24 2 2 2 0.055815 0.030766 -0.007990 0.119620 24 2 2 3 -0.263670 0.052025 -0.371564 -0.155776 24

(16)

LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=.62417, p=.54038

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

1 1 1 1 0.066297 0.015618 0.033908 0.098686 12 1 1 1 2 0.009269 0.023233 -0.038913 0.057451 12 1 1 1 3 -0.361624 0.068267 -0.503201 -0.220047 12 1 1 2 1 0.149763 0.022981 0.102103 0.197423 12 1 1 2 2 0.051786 0.030981 -0.012464 0.116036 12 1 1 2 3 -0.328281 0.074426 -0.482630 -0.173931 12 1 2 1 1 0.066563 0.015758 0.033882 0.099244 12 1 2 1 2 0.007619 0.023106 -0.040300 0.055539 12 1 2 1 3 -0.362466 0.067720 -0.502909 -0.222023 12 1 2 2 1 0.162824 0.026831 0.107180 0.218469 12 1 2 2 2 0.077750 0.043510 -0.012484 0.167984 12 1 2 2 3 -0.355242 0.073575 -0.507828 -0.202657 12 2 1 1 1 0.006274 0.015618 -0.026116 0.038663 12 2 1 1 2 0.011818 0.023233 -0.036364 0.060000 12 2 1 1 3 -0.194532 0.068267 -0.336109 -0.052955 12 2 1 2 1 0.037349 0.022981 -0.010311 0.085008 12 2 1 2 2 0.021525 0.030981 -0.042725 0.085775 12 2 1 2 3 -0.155697 0.074426 -0.310047 -0.001348 12 2 2 1 1 0.006268 0.015758 -0.026413 0.038949 12 2 2 1 2 0.010794 0.023106 -0.037125 0.058714 12 2 2 1 3 -0.198126 0.067720 -0.338569 -0.057684 12 2 2 2 1 0.036139 0.026831 -0.019506 0.091783 12 2 2 2 2 0.033881 0.043510 -0.056354 0.124115 12 2 2 2 3 -0.172097 0.073575 -0.324682 -0.019512 12

LC*TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=.59167, p=.55775

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 1 1 0.037174 0.010764 0.014851 0.059498 24 1 1 2 -0.002660 0.017064 -0.038047 0.032728 24 1 1 3 -0.291842 0.048755 -0.392954 -0.190729 24 1 2 1 0.097465 0.017550 0.061070 0.133861 24 1 2 2 0.052622 0.030007 -0.009609 0.114853 24 1 2 3 -0.257794 0.055637 -0.373178 -0.142410 24 2 1 1 0.035527 0.013755 0.007001 0.064052 24 2 1 2 0.022410 0.020206 -0.019496 0.064316 24 2 1 3 -0.266533 0.050737 -0.371755 -0.161310 24 2 2 1 0.095572 0.018122 0.057989 0.133155 24 2 2 2 0.039849 0.032010 -0.026537 0.106234 24 2 2 3 -0.247865 0.052689 -0.357135 -0.138594 24

(17)

LC*TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=.03232, p=.96822

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

1 1 1 1 0.067929 0.015223 0.036359 0.099499 12 1 1 1 2 -0.011836 0.024132 -0.061882 0.038210 12 1 1 1 3 -0.390739 0.068950 -0.533733 -0.247744 12 1 1 2 1 0.156911 0.024819 0.105440 0.208382 12 1 1 2 2 0.058053 0.042436 -0.029955 0.146060 12 1 1 2 3 -0.365272 0.078683 -0.528449 -0.202094 12 1 2 1 1 0.064931 0.019452 0.024590 0.105272 12 1 2 1 2 0.028724 0.028576 -0.030539 0.087988 12 1 2 1 3 -0.333351 0.071753 -0.482159 -0.184544 12 1 2 2 1 0.155676 0.025628 0.102526 0.208827 12 1 2 2 2 0.071483 0.045269 -0.022400 0.165366 12 1 2 2 3 -0.318251 0.074514 -0.472783 -0.163720 12 2 1 1 1 0.006419 0.015223 -0.025151 0.037989 12 2 1 1 2 0.006517 0.024132 -0.043529 0.056562 12 2 1 1 3 -0.192944 0.068950 -0.335939 -0.049950 12 2 1 2 1 0.038019 0.024819 -0.013451 0.089490 12 2 1 2 2 0.047192 0.042436 -0.040816 0.135199 12 2 1 2 3 -0.150317 0.078683 -0.313494 0.012861 12 2 2 1 1 0.006122 0.019452 -0.034219 0.046463 12 2 2 1 2 0.016096 0.028576 -0.043168 0.075359 12 2 2 1 3 -0.199714 0.071753 -0.348521 -0.050906 12 2 2 2 1 0.035468 0.025628 -0.017682 0.088618 12 2 2 2 2 0.008214 0.045269 -0.085669 0.102097 12 2 2 2 3 -0.177478 0.074514 -0.332010 -0.022946 12

(18)

LIMB*LC*TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=4.2483, p=.02056

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

1 1 1 1 0.036493 0.010482 0.014754 0.058232 24 1 1 1 2 -0.002360 0.017124 -0.037874 0.033153 24 1 1 1 3 -0.292908 0.049636 -0.395846 -0.189969 24 1 1 2 1 0.092401 0.015715 0.059810 0.124991 24 1 1 2 2 0.030147 0.020219 -0.011785 0.072080 24 1 1 2 3 -0.240944 0.057481 -0.360151 -0.121736 24 1 2 1 1 0.036078 0.013855 0.007344 0.064811 24 1 2 1 2 0.023447 0.020310 -0.018674 0.065568 24 1 2 1 3 -0.263249 0.050426 -0.367826 -0.158672 24 1 2 2 1 0.094711 0.017989 0.057403 0.132019 24 1 2 2 2 0.043164 0.031858 -0.022906 0.109234 24 1 2 2 3 -0.243034 0.051783 -0.350426 -0.135642 24 2 1 1 1 0.037856 0.011096 0.014844 0.060867 24 2 1 1 2 -0.002959 0.017026 -0.038269 0.032351 24 2 1 1 3 -0.290776 0.048032 -0.390389 -0.191163 24 2 1 2 1 0.102530 0.020549 0.059914 0.145145 24 2 1 2 2 0.075097 0.045548 -0.019364 0.169559 24 2 1 2 3 -0.274644 0.054330 -0.387317 -0.161972 24 2 2 1 1 0.034976 0.013673 0.006620 0.063332 24 2 2 1 2 0.021373 0.020111 -0.020335 0.063081 24 2 2 1 3 -0.269817 0.051094 -0.375780 -0.163854 24 2 2 2 1 0.096433 0.018352 0.058374 0.134493 24 2 2 2 2 0.036533 0.032178 -0.030200 0.103266 24 2 2 2 3 -0.252695 0.053627 -0.363910 -0.141480 24

(19)

LIMB*LC*TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (freq dev in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(2, 44)=.33241, p=.71898

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

1 1 1 1 1 0.066700 0.014824 0.035957 0.097443 12 1 1 1 1 2 -0.012104 0.024217 -0.062328 0.038120 12 1 1 1 1 3 -0.392232 0.070196 -0.537809 -0.246655 12 1 1 1 2 1 0.146107 0.022224 0.100017 0.192197 12 1 1 1 2 2 0.026436 0.028595 -0.032866 0.085738 12 1 1 1 2 3 -0.344760 0.081290 -0.513344 -0.176175 12 1 1 2 1 1 0.065894 0.019594 0.025259 0.106530 12 1 1 2 1 2 0.030642 0.028723 -0.028927 0.090210 12 1 1 2 1 3 -0.331017 0.071313 -0.478911 -0.183123 12 1 1 2 2 1 0.153419 0.025441 0.100658 0.206181 12 1 1 2 2 2 0.077136 0.045054 -0.016301 0.170573 12 1 1 2 2 3 -0.311801 0.073232 -0.463676 -0.159927 12 1 2 1 1 1 0.069158 0.015692 0.036615 0.101701 12 1 2 1 1 2 -0.011568 0.024078 -0.061504 0.038368 12 1 2 1 1 3 -0.389246 0.067928 -0.530120 -0.248372 12 1 2 1 2 1 0.167715 0.029060 0.107448 0.227983 12 1 2 1 2 2 0.089669 0.064415 -0.043919 0.223258 12 1 2 1 2 3 -0.385783 0.076834 -0.545127 -0.226440 12 1 2 2 1 1 0.063968 0.019336 0.023867 0.104069 12 1 2 2 1 2 0.026807 0.028442 -0.032177 0.085791 12 1 2 2 1 3 -0.335686 0.072258 -0.485541 -0.185832 12 1 2 2 2 1 0.157933 0.025954 0.104109 0.211758 12 1 2 2 2 2 0.065831 0.045507 -0.028544 0.160205 12 1 2 2 2 3 -0.324701 0.075840 -0.481983 -0.167420 12 2 1 1 1 1 0.006286 0.014824 -0.024457 0.037029 12 2 1 1 1 2 0.007383 0.024217 -0.042841 0.057607 12 2 1 1 1 3 -0.193583 0.070196 -0.339160 -0.048007 12 2 1 1 2 1 0.038694 0.022224 -0.007395 0.084784 12 2 1 1 2 2 0.033858 0.028595 -0.025443 0.093160 12 2 1 1 2 3 -0.137128 0.081290 -0.305712 0.031457 12 2 1 2 1 1 0.006261 0.019594 -0.034374 0.046897 12 2 1 2 1 2 0.016253 0.028723 -0.043316 0.075821 12 2 1 2 1 3 -0.195481 0.071313 -0.343375 -0.047586 12 2 1 2 2 1 0.036003 0.025441 -0.016758 0.088764 12 2 1 2 2 2 0.009192 0.045054 -0.084245 0.102629 12 2 1 2 2 3 -0.174267 0.073232 -0.326142 -0.022392 12 2 2 1 1 1 0.006553 0.015692 -0.025990 0.039096 12 2 2 1 1 2 0.005650 0.024078 -0.044286 0.055586 12 2 2 1 1 3 -0.192306 0.067928 -0.333179 -0.051432 12 2 2 1 2 1 0.037344 0.029060 -0.022923 0.097612 12 2 2 1 2 2 0.060525 0.064415 -0.073064 0.194114 12 2 2 1 2 3 -0.163506 0.076834 -0.322849 -0.004162 12 2 2 2 1 1 0.005983 0.019336 -0.034118 0.046085 12 2 2 2 1 2 0.015939 0.028442 -0.043045 0.074923 12 2 2 2 1 3 -0.203947 0.072258 -0.353802 -0.054093 12 2 2 2 2 1 0.034933 0.025954 -0.018891 0.088758 12 2 2 2 2 2 0.007236 0.045507 -0.087139 0.101611 12 2 2 2 2 3 -0.180689 0.075840 -0.337970 -0.023407 12

1.2 Preferred Frequency

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LIMB x LC ] ANOVA

Coding

(20)

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Task: 1= single task, 2= dual task

Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error LC LC*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LC*TASK LC*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC*TASK LIMB*LC*TASK*group Error

166.0469 1 166.0469 839.2177 0.000000 2.0059 1 2.0059 10.1378 0.004291

4.3529 22 0.1979

0.0009 1 0.0009 1.0601 0.314372 0.0007 1 0.0007 0.8234 0.374018 0.0192 22 0.0009

0.0278 1 0.0278 1.8157 0.191546 0.0630 1 0.0630 4.1141 0.054805 0.3369 22 0.0153

0.0897 1 0.0897 3.8897 0.061284 0.0433 1 0.0433 1.8800 0.184159 0.5073 22 0.0231

0.0018 1 0.0018 1.9198 0.179765 0.0006 1 0.0006 0.6376 0.433109 0.0209 22 0.0009

0.0015 1 0.0015 1.3534 0.257141 0.0001 1 0.0001 0.0711 0.792202 0.0238 22 0.0011

0.0128 1 0.0128 0.8473 0.367312 0.0124 1 0.0124 0.8227 0.374218 0.3319 22 0.0151

0.0024 1 0.0024 2.3099 0.142796 0.0002 1 0.0002 0.2158 0.646854 0.0228 22 0.0010

(21)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p

-d f -d f -d p

H-F Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2

LIMB LIMB*group Error LC LC*group Error TASK TASK*group Error LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LC*TASK LC*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC*TASK LIMB*LC*TASK*group

1 1.060137 0.314372#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.314372 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 1 0.823410 0.374018#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.374018 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 22

1 1.815653 0.191546#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.191546 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 1 4.114092 0.054805#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.054805 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 22

1 3.889678 0.061284#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.061284 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 1 1.880011 0.184159#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.184159 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 22

1 1.919809 0.179765#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.179765 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 1 0.637624 0.433109#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.433109 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 22

1 1.353438 0.257141#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.257141 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 1 0.071116 0.792202#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.792202 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 22

1 0.847262 0.367312#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.367312 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 1 0.822707 0.374218#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.374218 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 22

1 2.309887 0.142796#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.142796 1.000000 1.000000 22.000 1 0.215760 0.646854#### 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.646854 1.000000 1.000000 22.000

group; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 22)=10.138, p=.00429 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

gro up 0.6

0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2

DV

_

1

group; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Current effect: F(1, 22)=10.138, p=.00429

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.827749 0.045399 0.733599 0.921900 12 2 1.032173 0.045399 0.938022 1.126323 12

(22)

LIMB; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Current effect: F(1, 22)=1.0601, p=.31437

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.927764 0.032092 0.861210 0.994318 24 2 0.932158 0.032253 0.865269 0.999047 24

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.82341, p=.37402

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.823616 0.045384 0.729495 0.917738 12 1 2 0.831883 0.045613 0.737287 0.926478 12 2 1 1.031912 0.045384 0.937791 1.126033 12 2 2 1.032433 0.045613 0.937838 1.127029 12

LC; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Current effect: F(1, 22)=1.8157, p=.19155

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.917928 0.030719 0.854221 0.981635 24 2 0.941994 0.035734 0.867887 1.016101 24

LC*group; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=4.1141, p=.05480

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.797603 0.043443 0.707508 0.887698 12 1 2 0.857896 0.050535 0.753093 0.962699 12 2 1 1.038253 0.043443 0.948158 1.128348 12 2 2 1.026092 0.050535 0.921289 1.130896 12

TASK; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Current effect: F(1, 22)=3.8897, p=.06128

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.908348 0.035379 0.834976 0.981720 24 2 0.951574 0.032396 0.884388 1.018760 24

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Current effect: F(1, 22)=1.8800, p=.18416

Effective hypothesis decomposition

group TASK DV_1 DV_1 DV_1 DV_1 N

(23)

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Current effect: F(1, 22)=1.9198, p=.17977

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.912652 0.030374 0.849661 0.975643 24 1 2 0.942876 0.035775 0.868684 1.017068 24 2 1 0.923204 0.031663 0.857539 0.988869 24 2 2 0.941112 0.035694 0.867087 1.015138 24

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.63762, p=.43311

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.788617 0.042955 0.699534 0.877700 12 1 1 2 0.858616 0.050593 0.753692 0.963540 12 1 2 1 0.806590 0.044778 0.713725 0.899454 12 1 2 2 0.857176 0.050479 0.752488 0.961863 12 2 1 1 1.036688 0.042955 0.947605 1.125770 12 2 1 2 1.027136 0.050593 0.922212 1.132060 12 2 2 1 1.039818 0.044778 0.946954 1.132682 12 2 2 2 1.025049 0.050479 0.920361 1.129736 12

LIMB*TASK; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Current effect: F(1, 22)=1.3534, p=.25714

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.908912 0.035460 0.835373 0.982451 24 1 2 0.946616 0.032798 0.878597 1.014635 24 2 1 0.907784 0.035313 0.834548 0.981020 24 2 2 0.956532 0.032604 0.888915 1.024149 24

LIMB*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.07112, p=.79220

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.790372 0.050148 0.686371 0.894372 12 1 1 2 0.856861 0.046383 0.760668 0.953054 12 1 2 1 0.791850 0.049941 0.688279 0.895421 12 1 2 2 0.871915 0.046109 0.776291 0.967540 12 2 1 1 1.027453 0.050148 0.923453 1.131453 12 2 1 2 1.036371 0.046383 0.940178 1.132564 12 2 2 1 1.023718 0.049941 0.920147 1.127289 12 2 2 2 1.041149 0.046109 0.945524 1.136773 12

LC*TASK; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Current effect: F(1, 22)=.84726, p=.36731

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.904474 0.036933 0.827880 0.981068 24 1 2 0.931382 0.033002 0.862939 0.999824 24 2 1 0.912222 0.035810 0.837957 0.986488 24 2 2 0.971766 0.038732 0.891441 1.052091 24

(24)

LC*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.82271, p=.37422

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.777163 0.052231 0.668844 0.885483 12 1 1 2 0.818043 0.046672 0.721251 0.914835 12 1 2 1 0.805058 0.050643 0.700031 0.910086 12 1 2 2 0.910733 0.054775 0.797136 1.024330 12 2 1 1 1.031785 0.052231 0.923465 1.140104 12 2 1 2 1.044721 0.046672 0.947928 1.141513 12 2 2 1 1.019386 0.050643 0.914359 1.124414 12 2 2 2 1.032799 0.054775 0.919202 1.146396 12

LIMB*LC*TASK; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Current effect: F(1, 22)=2.3099, p=.14280

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.905491 0.037235 0.828271 0.982711 24 1 1 2 0.919813 0.033026 0.851322 0.988304 24 1 2 1 0.912333 0.035789 0.838111 0.986556 24 1 2 2 0.973419 0.038826 0.892898 1.053940 24 2 1 1 0.903457 0.036686 0.827375 0.979539 24 2 1 2 0.942951 0.035314 0.869714 1.016187 24 2 2 1 0.912111 0.035834 0.837795 0.986427 24 2 2 2 0.970113 0.038640 0.889978 1.050248 24

LIMB*LC*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.21576, p=.64685

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 0.776182 0.052658 0.666976 0.885388 12 1 1 1 2 0.801051 0.046705 0.704191 0.897912 12 1 1 2 1 0.804561 0.050614 0.699595 0.909528 12 1 1 2 2 0.912671 0.054909 0.798797 1.026545 12 1 2 1 1 0.778144 0.051882 0.670548 0.885741 12 1 2 1 2 0.835035 0.049941 0.731462 0.938607 12 1 2 2 1 0.805556 0.050677 0.700457 0.910654 12 1 2 2 2 0.908796 0.054646 0.795468 1.022124 12 2 1 1 1 1.034800 0.052658 0.925594 1.144006 12 2 1 1 2 1.038575 0.046705 0.941714 1.135436 12 2 1 2 1 1.020106 0.050614 0.915139 1.125072 12 2 1 2 2 1.034167 0.054909 0.920293 1.148040 12 2 2 1 1 1.028769 0.051882 0.921173 1.136366 12 2 2 1 2 1.050867 0.049941 0.947294 1.154439 12 2 2 2 1 1.018667 0.050677 0.913568 1.123765 12 2 2 2 2 1.031431 0.054646 0.918102 1.144759 12

(25)

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Frequency: 1= 20%, 2= 60%, 3= 100% of CF, 4= preferred

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error LC LC*group Error TASK TASK*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LC*TASK LC*TASK*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*TASK LIMB*LC*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*TASK*FREQ LC*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*TASK*FREQ LIMB*LC*TASK*FREQ*group Error

3.659036 1 3.659036 284.7990 0.000000

0.023960 1 0.023960 1.8649 0.185863 0.282651 22 0.012848

0.003905 1 0.003905 0.5533 0.464834 0.011633 1 0.011633 1.6483 0.212551 0.155273 22 0.007058

0.039000 1 0.039000 6.2408 0.020450

0.001116 1 0.001116 0.1786 0.676654 0.137485 22 0.006249

0.089218 1 0.089218 14.3294 0.001016

0.000256 1 0.000256 0.0410 0.841318 0.136977 22 0.006226

0.252045 3 0.084015 23.0948 0.000000 0.038211 3 0.012737 3.5013 0.020162

0.240097 66 0.003638

0.008839 1 0.008839 1.1274 0.299857 0.005636 1 0.005636 0.7189 0.405630 0.172485 22 0.007840

0.002032 1 0.002032 0.2893 0.596090 0.003520 1 0.003520 0.5011 0.486453 0.154549 22 0.007025

0.010311 1 0.010311 1.4129 0.247246 0.002669 1 0.002669 0.3657 0.551518 0.160543 22 0.007297

0.015901 3 0.005300 2.2652 0.089024 0.005589 3 0.001863 0.7961 0.500421 0.154437 66 0.002340

0.003849 3 0.001283 0.4610 0.710469 0.003521 3 0.001174 0.4217 0.738012 0.183664 66 0.002783

0.029806 3 0.009935 3.9002 0.012555

0.005299 3 0.001766 0.6933 0.559383 0.168128 66 0.002547

0.005538 1 0.005538 0.8154 0.376324 0.004511 1 0.004511 0.6642 0.423826 0.149428 22 0.006792

0.015733 3 0.005244 2.4611 0.070293 0.002535 3 0.000845 0.3965 0.755906 0.140640 66 0.002131

0.010545 3 0.003515 1.6367 0.189315 0.001967 3 0.000656 0.3053 0.821444 0.141746 66 0.002148

0.011959 3 0.003986 1.6841 0.178911 0.001120 3 0.000373 0.1577 0.924379 0.156226 66 0.002367

0.013179 3 0.004393 1.7899 0.157650 0.002640 3 0.000880 0.3586 0.783098 0.161988 66 0.002454

(26)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p H-F

Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lo A

LIMB LIMB*group Error LC LC*group Error TASK TASK*group Error FREQ FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

LIMB*TASK LIMB*TASK*group Error

LC*TASK LC*TASK*group Error

LIMB*FREQ LIMB*FREQ*group Error

LC*FREQ LC*FREQ*group Error

TASK*FREQ TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*TASK LIMB*LC*TASK*group Error

LIMB*LC*FREQ LIMB*LC*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*TASK*FREQ LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LC*TASK*FREQ LC*TASK*FREQ*group Error

LIMB*LC*TASK*FREQ LIMB*LC*TASK*FREQ*group Error

1 0.55332 0.464834 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.464834 1.000000 1.000000 2 1 1.64828 0.212551 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.212551 1.000000 1.000000 2 22

1 6.24075 0.020450 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.020450 1.000000 1.000000 2

1 0.17863 0.676654 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.676654 1.000000 1.000000 2 22

1 14.32943 0.001016 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.001016 1.000000 1.000000 2

1 0.04104 0.841318 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.841318 1.000000 1.000000 2 22

3 23.09483 0.000000 0.800461 2.401384 52.83044 0.000000 0.333333 1.000000 2 3 3.50130 0.020162 0.800461 2.401384 52.83044 0.029796 0.333333 1.000000 2 66

1 1.12736 0.299857 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.299857 1.000000 1.000000 2 1 0.71892 0.405630 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.405630 1.000000 1.000000 2 22

1 0.28927 0.596090 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.596090 1.000000 1.000000 2 1 0.50109 0.486453 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.486453 1.000000 1.000000 2 22

1 1.41291 0.247246 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.247246 1.000000 1.000000 2 1 0.36575 0.551518 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.551518 1.000000 1.000000 2 22

3 2.26517 0.089024 0.665075 1.995224 43.89494 0.115932 0.333333 1.000000 2 3 0.79611 0.500421 0.665075 1.995224 43.89494 0.457216 0.333333 1.000000 2 66

3 0.46100 0.710469 0.853565 2.560694 56.33528 0.680529 0.333333 1.000000 2 3 0.42175 0.738012 0.853565 2.560694 56.33528 0.707185 0.333333 1.000000 2 66

3 3.90019 0.012555 0.803560 2.410679 53.03494 0.019927 0.333333 1.000000 2 3 0.69333 0.559383 0.803560 2.410679 53.03494 0.530090 0.333333 1.000000 2 66

1 0.81535 0.376324 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.376324 1.000000 1.000000 2 1 0.66417 0.423826 1.000000 1.000000 22.00000 0.423826 1.000000 1.000000 2 22

3 2.46108 0.070293 0.602696 1.808089 39.77795 0.103131 0.333333 1.000000 2 3 0.39655 0.755906 0.602696 1.808089 39.77795 0.654596 0.333333 1.000000 2 66

3 1.63670 0.189315 0.655561 1.966684 43.26704 0.206753 0.333333 1.000000 2 3 0.30532 0.821444 0.655561 1.966684 43.26704 0.734839 0.333333 1.000000 2 66

3 1.68410 0.178911 0.686277 2.058831 45.29428 0.196331 0.333333 1.000000 2 3 0.15767 0.924379 0.686277 2.058831 45.29428 0.860335 0.333333 1.000000 2 66

3 1.78992 0.157650 0.680901 2.042702 44.93945 0.178019 0.333333 1.000000 2 3 0.35857 0.783098 0.680901 2.042702 44.93945 0.705092 0.333333 1.000000 2 66

(27)

LC; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 22)=6.2408, p=.02045 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

LC 0.00

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16

DV

_

1

TASK; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 22)=14.329, p=.00102 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2

TASK 0.00

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16

DV

_

1

(28)

FREQ; LS Means

Current effect: F(3, 66)=23.095, p=.00000 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpo sitio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

1 2 3 4

FREQ 0.00

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16

DV

_

1

FREQ*group; LS Means

Current effect: F(3, 66)=3.5013, p=.02016 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

group 1 group

2

1 2 3 4

FREQ -0.04

-0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18

DV

_

1

(29)

TASK*FREQ; L S Mea ns

Current effect: F(3, 66)=3.9002, p=.01256 Effective hypothe sis d eco mpositio n Vertica l ba rs d en ote 0.95 co nfid en ce in te rvals

TASK 1 TASK

2

1 2 3 4

FREQ 0.00

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18

DV

_

1

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00364, df = 66.000

Cell No.

FREQ {1} .09994

{2} .06257

{3} .05960

{4} .05399 1

2 3 4

1 0.000153 0.000152 0.000152

2 0.000153 0.962852 0.507766 3 0.000152 0.962852 0.798799 4 0.000152 0.507766 0.798799

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .00074, df = 60.660

Cell No.

group FREQ {1} .11688

{2} .06271

{3} .05884

{4} .06003

{5} .08301

{6} .06243

{7} .06036

{8} .04795 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 0.000127 0.000126 0.000127 0.462285 0.000306 0.000216 0.000130

1 2 0.000127 0.999841 0.999987 0.605843 1.000000 0.999999 0.885080 1 3 0.000126 0.999841 1.000000 0.382274 0.999981 1.000000 0.975821 1 4 0.000127 0.999987 1.000000 0.448029 0.999999 1.000000 0.994662 2 1 0.462285 0.605843 0.382274 0.448029 0.276075 0.173859 0.003589

2 2 0.000306 1.000000 0.999981 0.999999 0.276075 0.999998 0.710169 2 3 0.000216 0.999999 1.000000 1.000000 0.173859 0.999998 0.842023 2 4 0.000130 0.885080 0.975821 0.994662 0.003589 0.710169 0.842023

(30)

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00255, df = 66.000

Cell No.

TASK FREQ {1} .08321

{2} .04881

{3} .05925

{4} .04171

{5} .11668

{6} .07632

{7} .05995

{8} .06626 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 0.000425 0.032670 0.000132 0.000617 0.980211 0.042424 0.295019 1 2 0.000425 0.838935 0.976618 0.000126 0.007898 0.789014 0.261072 1 3 0.032670 0.838935 0.255624 0.000126 0.286304 1.000000 0.978116 1 4 0.000132 0.976618 0.255624 0.000126 0.000395 0.212409 0.026224

2 1 0.000617 0.000126 0.000126 0.000126 0.000138 0.000126 0.000126

2 2 0.980211 0.007898 0.286304 0.000395 0.000138 0.338179 0.862438 2 3 0.042424 0.789014 1.000000 0.212409 0.000126 0.338179 0.988125 2 4 0.295019 0.261072 0.978116 0.026224 0.000126 0.862438 0.988125

group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=1.8649, p=.18586

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.074612 0.005784 0.062616 0.086608 12 2 0.063437 0.005784 0.051441 0.075433 12

LIMB; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.55332, p=.46483

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.071279 0.002785 0.065503 0.077056 24 2 0.066769 0.006639 0.053001 0.080538 24

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=1.6483, p=.21255

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.072973 0.003939 0.064804 0.081142 12 1 2 0.076251 0.009389 0.056779 0.095724 12 2 1 0.069586 0.003939 0.061417 0.077755 12 2 2 0.057287 0.009389 0.037815 0.076760 12

LC; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=6.2408, p=.02045

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.076151 0.006687 0.062282 0.090019 24 2 0.061898 0.002239 0.057254 0.066542 24

(31)

LC*group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.17863, p=.67665

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.082946 0.009457 0.063334 0.102559 12 1 2 0.066278 0.003167 0.059711 0.072846 12 2 1 0.069355 0.009457 0.049742 0.088968 12 2 2 0.057518 0.003167 0.050951 0.064086 12

TASK; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=14.329, p=.00102

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.058246 0.002242 0.053597 0.062896 24 2 0.079803 0.006682 0.065945 0.093660 24

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.04104, p=.84132

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.064409 0.003170 0.057833 0.070984 12 1 2 0.084816 0.009449 0.065219 0.104413 12 2 1 0.052084 0.003170 0.045509 0.058659 12 2 2 0.074789 0.009449 0.055192 0.094386 12

FREQ; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(3, 66)=23.095, p=.00000

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 0.099945 0.005274 0.089007 0.110883 24 2 0.062567 0.008179 0.045606 0.079528 24 3 0.059599 0.003097 0.053177 0.066021 24 4 0.053987 0.004412 0.044838 0.063136 24

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(3, 66)=3.5013, p=.02016

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 0.116878 0.007459 0.101409 0.132346 12 1 2 0.062706 0.011566 0.038719 0.086693 12 1 3 0.058837 0.004379 0.049755 0.067919 12 1 4 0.060028 0.006239 0.047088 0.072967 12 2 1 0.083012 0.007459 0.067543 0.098480 12 2 2 0.062428 0.011566 0.038441 0.086415 12 2 3 0.060360 0.004379 0.051278 0.069442 12 2 4 0.047947 0.006239 0.035008 0.060886 12

(32)

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=1.1274, p=.29986

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.075013 0.004037 0.066640 0.083386 24 1 2 0.067546 0.002361 0.062649 0.072442 24 2 1 0.077288 0.012191 0.052006 0.102571 24 2 2 0.056251 0.002562 0.050937 0.061565 24

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.71892, p=.40563

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.075203 0.005709 0.063362 0.087044 12 1 1 2 0.070743 0.003339 0.063818 0.077668 12 1 2 1 0.090689 0.017241 0.054934 0.126444 12 1 2 2 0.061814 0.003624 0.054299 0.069328 12 2 1 1 0.074823 0.005709 0.062982 0.086664 12 2 1 2 0.064349 0.003339 0.057424 0.071274 12 2 2 1 0.063887 0.017241 0.028132 0.099642 12 2 2 2 0.050688 0.003624 0.043173 0.058203 12

LIMB*TASK; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.28927, p=.59609

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.062128 0.002835 0.056248 0.068008 24 1 2 0.080431 0.003667 0.072826 0.088036 24 2 1 0.054365 0.002103 0.050003 0.058726 24 2 2 0.079174 0.012115 0.054049 0.104300 24

LIMB*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.50109, p=.48645

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.066539 0.004010 0.058223 0.074855 12 1 1 2 0.079407 0.005186 0.068651 0.090162 12 1 2 1 0.062278 0.002974 0.056110 0.068446 12 1 2 2 0.090225 0.017134 0.054692 0.125758 12 2 1 1 0.057717 0.004010 0.049401 0.066032 12 2 1 2 0.081455 0.005186 0.070700 0.092211 12 2 2 1 0.046451 0.002974 0.040283 0.052619 12 2 2 2 0.068124 0.017134 0.032591 0.103657 12

LC*TASK; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw

(33)

LC*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.36575, p=.55152

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.067212 0.004322 0.058250 0.076174 12 1 1 2 0.098680 0.017164 0.063084 0.134277 12 1 2 1 0.061605 0.003123 0.055127 0.068083 12 1 2 2 0.070951 0.004094 0.062462 0.079441 12 2 1 1 0.056205 0.004322 0.047242 0.065167 12 2 1 2 0.082505 0.017164 0.046909 0.118102 12 2 2 1 0.047963 0.003123 0.041486 0.054441 12 2 2 2 0.067074 0.004094 0.058584 0.075563 12

LIMB*FREQ; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(3, 66)=2.2652, p=.08902

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 0.098753 0.004970 0.088445 0.109060 24 1 2 0.059861 0.002714 0.054232 0.065490 24 1 3 0.068400 0.004895 0.058247 0.078552 24 1 4 0.058105 0.003951 0.049911 0.066299 24 2 1 0.101137 0.007017 0.086584 0.115690 24 2 2 0.065274 0.014711 0.034764 0.095783 24 2 3 0.050798 0.002351 0.045922 0.055673 24 2 4 0.049869 0.007163 0.035014 0.064725 24

LIMB*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(3, 66)=.79611, p=.50042

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 0.112601 0.007029 0.098024 0.127179 12 1 1 2 0.059497 0.003839 0.051537 0.067458 12 1 1 3 0.063650 0.006923 0.049292 0.078007 12 1 1 4 0.056143 0.005588 0.044555 0.067732 12 1 2 1 0.121154 0.009924 0.100573 0.141736 12 1 2 2 0.065915 0.020805 0.022768 0.109062 12 1 2 3 0.054025 0.003325 0.047130 0.060920 12 1 2 4 0.063912 0.010130 0.042903 0.084921 12 2 1 1 0.084904 0.007029 0.070326 0.099481 12 2 1 2 0.060224 0.003839 0.052263 0.068185 12 2 1 3 0.073150 0.006923 0.058792 0.087507 12 2 1 4 0.060066 0.005588 0.048478 0.071655 12 2 2 1 0.081120 0.009924 0.060539 0.101702 12 2 2 2 0.064632 0.020805 0.021485 0.107779 12 2 2 3 0.047571 0.003325 0.040676 0.054465 12 2 2 4 0.035827 0.010130 0.014818 0.056836 12

(34)

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(3, 66)=.46100, p=.71047

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 0.104065 0.007262 0.089005 0.119125 24 1 2 0.072907 0.014424 0.042994 0.102821 24 1 3 0.066048 0.005534 0.054571 0.077525 24 1 4 0.061582 0.007682 0.045651 0.077513 24 2 1 0.095825 0.005619 0.084171 0.107478 24 2 2 0.052227 0.002822 0.046375 0.058079 24 2 3 0.053149 0.002169 0.048652 0.057647 24 2 4 0.046392 0.002217 0.041794 0.050991 24

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(3, 66)=.42175, p=.73801

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 0.124391 0.010269 0.103094 0.145689 12 1 1 2 0.072672 0.020398 0.030369 0.114976 12 1 1 3 0.063864 0.007827 0.047632 0.080095 12 1 1 4 0.070858 0.010864 0.048328 0.093388 12 1 2 1 0.109364 0.007947 0.092884 0.125845 12 1 2 2 0.052740 0.003991 0.044464 0.061016 12 1 2 3 0.053811 0.003067 0.047451 0.060171 12 1 2 4 0.049197 0.003136 0.042695 0.055700 12 2 1 1 0.083739 0.010269 0.062441 0.105036 12 2 1 2 0.073143 0.020398 0.030839 0.115446 12 2 1 3 0.068232 0.007827 0.052001 0.084463 12 2 1 4 0.052306 0.010864 0.029776 0.074836 12 2 2 1 0.082285 0.007947 0.065804 0.098766 12 2 2 2 0.051714 0.003991 0.043438 0.059990 12 2 2 3 0.052488 0.003067 0.046128 0.058848 12 2 2 4 0.043587 0.003136 0.037084 0.050090 12

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(3, 66)=3.9002, p=.01256

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 0.083213 0.004165 0.074575 0.091851 24 1 2 0.048811 0.002469 0.043692 0.053931 24 1 3 0.059246 0.003142 0.052730 0.065762 24 1 4 0.041715 0.002266 0.037016 0.046414 24 2 1 0.116677 0.007892 0.100309 0.133045 24 2 2 0.076323 0.014476 0.046302 0.106343 24 2 3 0.059951 0.004939 0.049709 0.070193 24 2 4 0.066259 0.007570 0.050559 0.081959 24

(35)

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(3, 66)=.69333, p=.55938

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group TASK FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 0.102472 0.005890 0.090256 0.114688 12 1 1 2 0.052179 0.003491 0.044938 0.059419 12 1 1 3 0.058822 0.004443 0.049608 0.068037 12 1 1 4 0.044161 0.003204 0.037516 0.050806 12 1 2 1 0.131283 0.011161 0.108136 0.154431 12 1 2 2 0.073233 0.020472 0.030778 0.115689 12 1 2 3 0.058852 0.006984 0.044368 0.073337 12 1 2 4 0.075894 0.010706 0.053691 0.098097 12 2 1 1 0.063953 0.005890 0.051737 0.076169 12 2 1 2 0.045444 0.003491 0.038203 0.052684 12 2 1 3 0.059670 0.004443 0.050455 0.068884 12 2 1 4 0.039269 0.003204 0.032624 0.045914 12 2 2 1 0.102071 0.011161 0.078923 0.125218 12 2 2 2 0.079412 0.020472 0.036957 0.121868 12 2 2 3 0.061050 0.006984 0.046566 0.075535 12 2 2 4 0.056624 0.010706 0.034421 0.078828 12

LIMB*LC*TASK; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.81535, p=.37632

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.064883 0.003908 0.056779 0.072987 24 1 1 2 0.085143 0.005329 0.074091 0.096196 24 1 2 1 0.059373 0.002744 0.053683 0.065063 24 1 2 2 0.075719 0.003019 0.069458 0.081979 24 2 1 1 0.058534 0.003097 0.052112 0.064956 24 2 1 2 0.096042 0.023496 0.047314 0.144771 24 2 2 1 0.050195 0.002041 0.045962 0.054429 24 2 2 2 0.062306 0.003574 0.054894 0.069718 24

LIMB*LC*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(1, 22)=.66417, p=.42383

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC TASK DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 0.068350 0.005526 0.056890 0.079810 12 1 1 1 2 0.082056 0.007537 0.066425 0.097687 12 1 1 2 1 0.064728 0.003880 0.056681 0.072776 12 1 1 2 2 0.076757 0.004269 0.067904 0.085610 12 1 2 1 1 0.066074 0.004379 0.056992 0.075156 12 1 2 1 2 0.115304 0.033229 0.046392 0.184217 12 1 2 2 1 0.058482 0.002887 0.052495 0.064469 12 1 2 2 2 0.065145 0.005054 0.054663 0.075627 12 2 1 1 1 0.061416 0.005526 0.049955 0.072876 12 2 1 1 2 0.088231 0.007537 0.072600 0.103861 12 2 1 2 1 0.054018 0.003880 0.045970 0.062065 12 2 1 2 2 0.074680 0.004269 0.065827 0.083533 12 2 2 1 1 0.050994 0.004379 0.041912 0.060075 12 2 2 1 2 0.076780 0.033229 0.007868 0.145692 12 2 2 2 1 0.041909 0.002887 0.035922 0.047896 12 2 2 2 2 0.059467 0.005054 0.048985 0.069949 12

(36)

LIMB*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (cov for freq in data_part1_kinematic.stw Current effect: F(3, 66)=2.4611, p=.07029

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC FREQ DV_1 Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 0.100198 0.006225 0.087289 0.113107 24 1 1 2 0.059615 0.002637 0.054146 0.065084 24 1 1 3 0.076781 0.009081 0.057949 0.095614 24 1 1 4 0.063458 0.006998 0.048945 0.077971 24 1 2 1 0.097307 0.006183 0.084484 0.110130 24 1 2 2 0.060106 0.003286 0.053291 0.066922 24 1 2 3 0.060018 0.002722 0.054373 0.065663 24 1 2 4 0.052752 0.002241 0.048105 0.057399 24 2 1 1 0.107932 0.011114 0.084882 0.130982 24 2 1 2 0.086200 0.027832 0.028481 0.143919 24 2 1 3 0.055315 0.004067 0.046880 0.063749 24 2 1 4 0.059706 0.013291 0.032141 0.087270 24 2 2 1 0.094342 0.005974 0.081954 0.106731 24 2 2 2 0.044347 0.002943 0.038243 0.050451 24 2 2 3 0.046281 0.002827 0.040418 0.052144 24 2 2 4 0.040033 0.002586 0.034671 0.045395 24

References

Related documents

At body temperature (37 o C), the gas solubilities and diffusivities are slightly higher, and thus we expect a corresponding increase in the rate of gas exchange and oxygen

LIMONE SUCCO 1987/AS ZDT-TGMS Pareve Symbol.. BB306H E.SOL.CEDRATA AURELIA 1x1250 BRL-MDCK

However, whatever your industry, these e-business technologies will help you better manage your supply chain and fi nd increased effi ciencies in your operations,

The data were collected from 218 undergraduate nursing students using demographic data, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 42).The progressive muscle

505 Institute of Certified Public Accountants Retirement Benefits Scheme PN DC 506 Institute of Economic Affairs Staff Provident Fund Scheme PV DC 507 Institute of

over the thermoformed sheet. To make the cut, a sheet shear has been used, according to [29]. Thermoforming of specimens for tensile tests: a) Hybrid mould; b) Thermoforming of the

In the paper, the analysis modal and method of CEFR core assemblies are researched, considering the fluid structure interaction, the dynamic analysis of one row and three rows

In SSA Form, the fact that the interference graph is chordal yields a stronger guarantee of k -colorability than traditional coalescing methods, because merging vertices may not