The effect of early exercise on the articular cartilage and subchondral bone of the distal third metacarpal/metatarsal bones of young thoroughbred horses : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Veterinary

Full text

(1)Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author..

(2) THE EFFECT OF EARLY EXERCISE ON THE ARTICULAR CARTILAGE AND SUBCHONDRAL BONE OF THE DISTAL THIRD METACARPAL/METATARSAL BONES OF YOUNG THOROUGHBRED HORSES.. A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Veterinary Science at Massey University, Palmerston North New Zealand.. Susanne Dykgraaf. 2003.

(3) ii. CONTENTS. TITLE. i. ...................................................................................................................................... TAB LE OF CONTENTS. ii. ....................................................................................................... LIST OF ILLU STRATIONS LIST OF TAB LES. .......................................... ABB REVIATIONS. .. ..... ............................................................... ix. ................................................................................................... ................................................................ . . . . ....................................................... CHAPTER 1. .................................... ................................................ Background. 1.2. Literature Review. x. xi. INTRODUCTION. 1.1. v. viii. ............................................................................................................... ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT. ................................................................................................. .......................................................................................................... ........................................ ........ ................................................. I ! S. 1 .2. 1. Synovial joint structure and function .. 1 .2.2. J oint capsule and l igaments . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. 1 .2.3. Synovial membrane. . . . . . . . . . . .. . ........... ... ...... ..... .. ........ . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .6. 1. 2 . 4. Joint innervation and blood supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. 1 .2.5. Synovial fluid and l ubrication . . . .. 1 .2 .6. Articular cartilage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 .2.7. Subchondral bone. . . . .. 1 .2.8. The equi ne metacarpophalangeal joint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23. 1 .2.9. Biomechanjcal behaviour of articular cartilage and subchondral bone . . . . . . 26. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·. ...............5. .. . . . . . .. . . . ...... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7 ................I 0. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1. 1 . 2 . 1 0 Loading of articular cartilage and subchondral bone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 1 .2. 1 1. Osteoarthritis (OA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... ... . ..... .. . .. . . ..... . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ........... .. .... 3 1. 1 . 2 . 1 2 Methods of assessing articular cartilage and bone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5 1 . 2 . 1 3 Effect of exercise on articular cartilage and subchondral bone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 1 . 2 . 1 4 Viabi lity staining and confocal microscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 1 . 2. 1 5 Computed tomography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 . .. 1.3. Summary. 1.4. Hypotheses. 1 .4. 1. CHAPTER2. .................................. ............................ .. ... ............... .......... .. .. , ......................................................... 52. .................................................................... 54. Objectives of t rus study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5 .. MATERIALS AND METH0 DS ................................. ......................... 5 6. 2 .1. Definitions. 22 .. Animals ..................................... ......................................................................... 5 7. 2 .3. Joint Dissection. ......................... .. ........................................................................ .. .. .......... ................................................................................ .................. 56. 58.

(4) iii. 2.4. Articular Cartilage Sample Collection and Preparation .................................. 5 8. 2.5. Confocal Microscopy .........................................................................................60. 2.5. 1. Viability staining . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60. 2.5.2. Microscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. 2.6. Computed Tomography ....................................................................................64. 2.7. Image Analysis. 2.8. Histological Scoring Systems .............................................................................66. 2.9. .................................................................................................... 2.8. 1. Histomorphologic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2.8.2. Histochemical examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. 65. . . . 66. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 .. . .. Statistical A nalysis............................................................................................. 68. CHAPTER 3. RESULTS ..............................................................................................69. 3.1. Growth Rate and Work Load ........................................................................... 69. 3.2. Medical History .................................................................................................69. 3.3. Gross Pathology .................................................................................................71. 3.4. Non-calcified Cartilage Thickness of Mc3 ........................................................ 72. 3.5. Total Number of Chondrocytes......................................................................... 74. 3.6. Percentage of Viable Chondrocytes .................................................................. 77. 3.7. Subchondral Bone Mineral Density .................................................................. 84. 3.8. Percentage of Dead Chondrocytes and SCB Mineral Density ......................... 8 7. 3.9. Location of Dead Chondrocytes ........................................................................ 91. 3.10 Examples of Patterns of Chondrocyte Viability Staining ................................. 93 3.11 Histological Assessment of Articular Cartilage ................................................ 98 3.12. Examples of Confocallmages With Corresponding Histological Images...... lOt. CHAPTER4. DISCUSSION ...................................................................................... 103. 4.1. Effect of Exercise and Loading on the Percentage of Viable Chondrocytes .. 103. 4.2. Effect of Exercise and Loading on the Total Number of Chondrocytes ........ 105. 4.3. Relationship of Chondrocyte Viability and SCB BMD .................................. 106. 4.4. Location of Dead Chondrocytes Within the Articular Cartilage ................... 107. 4.5. Effect of Exercise on Non-calcified Articular Cartilage Thickness................ lOB. 4.6. Patterns of Cell Staining .. 4.7. Medical History and Gross Pathology ............................................................ 110. 4.8. Histomorphometry, Histochemistry and Confocal Microscopy..................... llO. 4.9. Workload, Sex and Limb Effects .................................................................... lll. ........................... .. ............................ .. ........................... I 08.

(5) iv. 4.10 Initiating Event in Osteoarthritis: Articular Cartilage Matrix Degradation or Subchondral Bone Sclerosis? .......................................................................... 112 4.11. Apoptosis or Necrosis? ....................................................................................113. 4.12. Sources of Error and Limitations of the Study...............................................113. 4.13. Further Research.............................................................................................114. 4.14 Conclusion .......................................................................................................115. APPENDICES. .............................................................................................................. Appendix 1 : Viability Stain Stock Solutions Appendix 2: Thresholding. ................. .. .......... .. ...... .. ......... .. . .. 116. .. ll7. ........................................................... Appendix 3: Articular Cartilage Zones. ............ Appendix 4: Histological Slide Preparation. REFERENCE LIST. ...................... ..... .................................................... .. .. ....... ... ........... ............. .. ................................................. .. . . .................................... ......................... .. .............. .. ...... .. 116. .. ............ .................. 118 120. 123.

(6) V. LIST OF ILLUS TRATIONS. F igure 1 . 1 :. Diagram of a synovial joint. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. Figure 1 . 2:. Boundary lubrication of articular cartilage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. F igure 1 . 3:. Hydrodynamic and squeeze film fluid l ubrication. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 0. F igure 1 . 4:. Regional organisation of mammal ian articular cartilage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2. Figure 1 . 5 :. Organisatio n o f t he major extra-cellular matrix components in articular. cartilage. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . Figure 1 . 6:. ..... 1 5. . . . . . . . . . . .. ...... .. .. .. ...... ........ .. . . . . .... . ...... . .. Diagrammatic representation of the large proteoglycan aggrecan and. l i nk protein, which bind to each other and to hyaluronan (HA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6 Figure 1 . 7:. T he reparative attempt of chondral defects in which inj ury is l imited t o. articular carti lage. . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 1 . 8 :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20. . . . ... .... .. .. Diagram of a sagittal section of the metacarpophalangeal j oint and the. associated soft t issue structures. .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . F igure I. 9:. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23. Diagram of the factors involved in articular cartilage degradation in ...31. osteoarthritis . . . F igure I 1 0: Diagram of factors involved i n enzymatic degradation of articular cartilage matrix. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .... .... . . ... . .. .. .. .... .... . . ... .. . . . ..... . . . . . . . . 32. F igure 1 . 1 1 : I mage of articular cartilage (articular surface at the top of the i mage ) with predominantly viable chondrocytes that have retained the fluorescent stain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48. calcein. ( 1 6x obj ective). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. F igure 1 . 1 2: I mage of articular cartilage, after to 80° for 30 mi nutes (articular surface at the top of the image), demonstrating dead chondrocytes.. All. chondrocytes have stained with propidium i odide ( 1 6x objective) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 Figure 2. 1 :. I mages of the articular cartilage explant location and sampling. technique. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .... .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59. F igure 2 . 2 :. Diagram o f the bisection plane of the articular cartilage explants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60. Figure 2 . 3 :. Diagram of a mounted confocal microscopy slide. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Figure 2.4:. Fluorescence emi ssion profiles for calcein and for propidium iodide. bound to DNA. .61. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 62. Figure 2. 5 :. Diagram o f a fresh articular cartilage sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63. Figure 2 . 6 :. I mages of pQCT data collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65. Figure 3. 1 :. Workload of exercised group over study period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69. F igure 3 . 2:. I mage of t he right MCP joint of horse No. 33 with a dorsomedial Pp. chondroid fragment (arrow) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72.

(7) vi. Figure 3 . 3 :. Box and whisker plot comparing the non-calcified articular cartilage. thickness in control and exercised horses between dorsal and palmar regions . . . . . . . . . . 73 Figure 3.4:. Box and whisker plot of pooled t otal number of chondrocytes per field. for individual horses.. At least three con focal microscopy images from 1 0. samples from the t hree j oints of each horse were counted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 F igure 3 . 5 :. Box and whisker plot of the total number of c hondrocytes for pooled. dorsal and palmar sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 F igure 3 . 6 :. Box and whisker plot of the total number of c hondrocytes for pooled. left and right forelimb s ites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F i gure 3. 7:. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76. Box and whisker plot of the percentage of viable chondrocytes for. forelimbs and hindlimb by treatment group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F igure 3.8:. . . . . . . 77. .. Box and whisker plot of the percentage of viable chondrocytes in colts. and fil l ies by treatment group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 F igure 3. 9 :. Box and whisker plot of the percentage of viable chondrocytes. exercised and control horses for data pooled across all sites.. m. . . . . . . . 79. Figure 3. l 0: Box and whisker plot of the percentage of viable chondrocytes. m. exercised and control horses at dorsal and pal mar sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Figure 3 . 1 1 : Box and whisker plot of the percentage of viable chondrocytes in the pooled dorsal and palmar sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. ......................... ........... 8 1. F igure 3. 1 2: Box and whisker plot of the percentage of viable c hondrocytes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 F igure 3 . 1 3 : Box and whisker plot of percentage of viable cells at pooled lateral and medial sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83. . .. Figure 3. 1 4: Bone mineral density ranges. m. the dorsal regions of control and. exercised horses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F igure 3 . 1 5 : Bone mineral density ranges exercised horses. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. m. .. . . 84. t he palmar regions of control and. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 84. Figure 3. 1 6: Box and whisker plot of the mean BMD for exercise and control groups pooled across all sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5 Figure 3 . 1 7: Box and whisker plot o f the percentage o f area o f very high density bone (> 0. 76g/cm 3 ) for exercised and control groups pooled across all sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 Figure 3. 1 8: Box and whisker plot of t he percentage area of very high density bone for exercise and control groups at palmar and dorsal regions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 Figure 3 . 1 9: pQCT images of dorsal (left) and palmar (right) sl ices of distal Mc3 . . . . . . . . . . . 86 Figure 3 . 20: Regression of the mean BMD with percentage of dead chondrocytes across pooled exercised and pooled control sites. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87.

(8) vii. Figure 3. 2 1 : Regression of the mean. BMD with. the percentage of dead. chondrocytes across pooled palmar and pooled dorsal sites. .. .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. 88. F igure 3 . 22: Regression of the percentage of very high BMD voxels with the % of dead chondrocytes across pooled exercised and control sites. .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . 89 .. Figure 3 . 23 : Regression of the percentage of very high BMD voxels with the % of dead chondrocytes across pooled palmar and pooled dorsal sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 .. .. .. .. .. Figure 3 . 24: Box and whisker plot of the percentage of dead c el ls in zones A and B of the articular cartilage sections. .. . . . .. .. . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . 91. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. Figure 3 . 25: Box and whisker plot of the percentage of dead chondrocytes i n each ........ .... .. ............ zone by treatment group. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 92. Figure 3. 26: Box and whisker plot of the percentage of dead c hondrocytes in each zone by region. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . ...... .. Figure 3 . 27: Con focal images of viable staining chondrocytes Figure 3 . 2 8: Confocal images of viable staining chondrocytes. .... . .... . . .. .. ... .. . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... ... . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. . . . 92. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 93 93. Figure 3 . 29: Con focal images of predominantly viable staining chondrocytes . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 .. Figure 3 . 30: Con focal images of viable and dead staining chondrocytes. .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Figure 3 . 32: Con focal images of viable staining deep zone chondrocytes . . . . . . . . .. 94. . . .. . . . . 95. .. Figure 3 . 33: Con focal images of abnormal chondrocytes and articular cartilage . . . . . F igure 3 . 34: Con focal images of abnormal chondrocytes and articular cartilage . . Figure 3 . 35: Confocal images of articular cartilage abnormality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . 95. F igure 3. 3 1 : Con focal images of viable and dead staining chondrocytes . . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. . . . . .. . . . 96. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. 96. . . . . . . . 97 .. .. .. F igure 3 . 36: Histogram of the modified Mankin scores across pooled control and exercised sites. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . . ...... . ..... . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. F igure 3. 37: Histogram of the overall modified Mankin scores for dorsal and palmar regions.. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. .98. Figure 3 . 3 8: Box and whisker plot of pooled colt and fil l y scores b y treatment group. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. F igure 3. 39: Histogram of the overall SOFG score for treatment group . . . . . .. F igure 3.40: H istogram of the overall S OFG score by region. .. . . . .. ... . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. 99. . 1 00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. l 00. Figure 3.4 1 : I mages comparing con focal, SOFG and H&E stainjng of the articular cartilage. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. . ............... . . . . . .. .......... . .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . .. ..... 1 0l. Figure 3 .42: I mages comparing confocal, SOFG and H&E stairung of the articular cartilage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. I 02.

(9) viii. LIST OF TABLES. Table I . I : necrosis Table 3. I :. Comparison of the mam features characteristic of apoptosis and . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. M usculoskeletal c onditions and inj uries occurring within 24 weeks of. euthanasia Table 3.2:. 46. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Gross pathology within metacarpo/tarsophalangeal joints at dissection. .. . . .. . . . . . .. 70 71.

(10) ix. ABBREVIATIONS. BMD. Volumetric bone mineral density. CDET. Common d igital extensor tendon. CLSM. Confocal laser scanning m icroscopy. D DFI. Deep digital flexor tendon. DJD. Degenerative joint disease. DXA. Dual x-ray absorptiometry. ECM. Extra-cel lular matrix. HA. Hyaluronan. 11-1. Interleukin l. Mc3. Third metacarpal bone. MCP. Metacarpophalangeal. M i\1P. Matrix metal loproteinases. Mt3. Third metatarsal bone. MTP. Metatarsophalangea I. NO. Nitric oxide. OA. Osteoarthritis. PP. Proximal phalanx. PG. Proteoglycan. PI. Propidium i odide. pQCT. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography. PSB. Proximal sesamoid bones. ROI. Regions of interest. RA. Rheumatoid arthritis. SDFI. S uperficial digital flexor tendon. SCT. S ubchondral calcified tissues. SCB. S ubchondral bone. TNF. Tumour necrosis factor.

(11) X. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. I am very grateful for the encouragement and assistance provided by friends, family and colleagues during the course of this thesis.. In particular, I am extremely fortunate to have had the benefit of working with my supervisors, Professor Elwyn Firth, Dr Chris Rogers and Dr Chris Kawcak. I am indebted to them for their generosity in providi ng, their time, guidance and advice, and for igniting and fuel ling an i nterest in musculoskeletal research.. I am especial ly grateful to The New Zealand Equine Research Foundation for their generosity in providing financial assistance towards this project.. I would like to thank The G lobal Equine. Research Alliance (GERA) for allowing me to use tissues from their animals and to work with such world renowned researchers.. Special thanks m ust be extended to Liz Nickless and AI Rowland for their patience in guiding me through the wonderful world of confocal microscopy. L iz's expertise in image analysis was also appreciated as was Don Bailey's input. Mike Doube's ever present enthusiasm was also an important factor in this project. T he original illustrations i n Chapter 2 are mostly due to Mike's artistic abilities.. I would like to thank Dr Peter Bush for his advice on viabil ity staining of. articular cartilage, and Mervyn Birtles, G uy Hessell and Marti Sheri n for their expertise and advice with the h istological slides and CT scanning respectively.. I would like to thank Trish Moffat, Donna Williamson, Andy H unt, Vaughan S eed, Tony Mogg, and Martin J ohnson for their support. Dr Mark Ethell was instrumental during the early phases of this study and his input has been a major influence during my i nitiation into research and veterinary surgery.. To my parents Bob and Muriel, thank you for your never-ending encouragement and support..

(12) xi. ABSTRACT. The effect of early moderate exercise on articular cartilage and subchondral bone were investigated by comparing two groups of age and sex matched, pasture reared, 1 8 month old (± one month) Thoroughbred horses. The treatment group (n=6, 3 colts, 3 fillies) were exercised five days per week from I 0 days of age on a purpose-built grass racetrack. The control group were managed identical ly but did not participate in an exercise programme.. Articular cartilage samples were taken from all horses, from the palmar and dorsal regions of the left and ri ght distal third metacarpal bones (Mc3) and the palmar region of the left third metatarsal bone (Mt3). The sites were selected from regions that sustain high (palmar region) and low ( dorsal region) load during exercise.. The fresh articular cartilage samples were. inc ubated with fl uorescent stains (calcein-AM and propidium iodide) and examined under confocal laser scanning microscopy to assess chondrocyte viability. The number of viable and dead chondrocytes at each site was determined based on the fluorescent staining c haracteristics. The subchondral epiphyseal bone mineral density adjacent to the articular cartilage sample sites was measured using computed tomography data from regions of interest wh ich were 2 mm proximal to the interface of calcified cartilage and subchondral bone.. There was a 1 4% greater percentage of viable chondrocytes in the exercised horses (p=O . OO l ), and a 34% greater percentage of viable chondrocytes at the control palmar regions compared to control dorsal regions (p=O.OO l ).. One exercised horse and five control horses had subtle. macroscopic features consistent with osteoarthritis (OA) in the metacarpo(tarso)-phalangeal joints.. Variation in chondrocyte viability was less in palmar and dorsal sites from exercised. animals, and palmar sites from control animals.. An association between percentage of dead. chondrocytes and sc lerosis of the subchondral bone (SCB) could not be identi fied. chondrocyte viability occurred independently of SCB sclerosis.. L ower. T he sequence of initiating. events leading to reduced articular cartilage viability appeared to be unassociated with SCB sclerosis at the sites of distal Mc3/Mt3 under the moderate exercise regimen imposed.. The effect of early exercise on the articular cartilage and SCB of y oung Thoroughbred horses has been further elucidated. Early exercise appeared to have beneficial effect on the viability of the articular cartilage sampled in this group of horses. The abnormalities detected may have been the earliest stages of idiopathic OA, but the relative and temporal i nvolvements of articular cartilage and SCB remain undefined..

(13)

No results found