0022-538X/81/060872-08$02.00/0
Rearrangement
of
Integrated
Viral DNA
Sequences
in
Mouse
Cells
Transformed by Simian Virus
40
MARY ANN BENDER ANDWILLIAM W. BROCKMAN*
DepartmentofMicrobiology, University of MichiganMedicalSchool,AnnArbor, Michigan48109
Received 15 December1980/Accepted 26 February 1981
The organization ofviral DNA sequences inseveral celllines derived from a
primary colony of simian virus 40(SV40)-transformed mousecellswasanalyzed
to examine the origin of the various distinctive patterns of SV40 sequence
arrangement present in transformed cells. This analysis revealed a complex
arrangement of viralsequencesintheuncloned transformed cellsbutsimplified arrangements incloned derivatives of theprimary transformant. The cell lines
studied hadcertainSV40sequencearrangementsincommon,but thecloned lines
had lost some parental arrangements and acquired new arrangements. These
results indicate that the arrangement of viral sequences in some
SV40-trans-formed cellsis not fixed but that alterations occurafter integration, creating a
heterogeneous population oftransformants. In the process, expression of viral
genes maybe altered. Possible causesforandimplications ofthisgenetic
insta-bilityare discussed.
Cellular transformation inducedbysimian
vi-rus 40 (SV40) results from expression ofa
por-tion of the viral genome which is integrated
within the host cell DNA (19). Recently, the
patterns of integration of SV40 sequences in
several transformed cell lines have been
ana-lyzed (4,5, 14;G.Ketner and T. J.Kelly,J.Mol.
Biol., in press). From the results ofthese studies,
it may beconcludedthat therearemanysites in
cellular DNA into which SV40 may integrate
and that there are multiple sites in the viral
genome at which recombination with host
se-quences mayoccur. An assumption underlying
such conclusions is that rearrangementof
inte-grated viral DNA does not occur after the
pri-maryintegration event.
To gaina betterunderstanding of the
mech-anismresultinginstableintegrationpatterns in
transformed cells, we analyzed the SV40
se-quences present in cells grown from a primary
colony of SV40-transformed BALB/c 3T3
mousecells as wellastheviral sequences in each
ofseveral lines generated by consecutive cloning
of the primary transformant. This analysis
re-vealed that the pattern of integration ofSV40
sequences in the primary transformant is not
stable. Alterations in the arrangement of viral
sequencesresult in the appearance of new
inte-gration patternsinclones derived from the
pri-mary transformant. These results suggest that
the arrangement ofSV40 sequences present in
serially cloned,stabletransformants may not be
atruereflection of theinitial integration of SV40
into cell DNA but rather may represent the
cumulative result of eventsoccurring after the
primaryrecombination event.
(A portion of this work was carried out by
M.A.B.inpartialfulfilmentofrequirementsfor
the Ph.D. degree from the Departmentof
Mi-crobiology, University of Michigan Medical
School.)
MATERIALS AND METHODS Virus and cells. Thepropagation ofBALB/c 3T3
mousecells and their transformationby infection with tsA58 virionswereperformedat33°Cas wepreviously described (6, 12).Aprimary focus of transformed cells
wasisolatedinliquid medium and recloned thrice in successionat33'Cby endpointdilution. In thiscloning procedure,trypsinized cellswereplatedathigh dilu-tion in2-cm2wells and allowedtogrowintocolonies. Individual cloneswerepropagated from wells contain-ingasinglecolony.
Viraland recombinant DNAs.SV40 DNA was prepared from BSC-1 cells infected with wild-type
SV40 strain776asdescribedpreviously(9) and
puri-fiedbyelectrophoresisin 1.4% agarosegels (7). To ensure thatSV40 DNAused forhybridization
was not contaminated with mammalian cell DNA, SV40 DNA cloned in aplasmid vectorwas used in somehybridization experiments. Recombinant DNA
consisting ofSV40 strain 776 DNA cleaved at the
BamHIsite and insertedinto plasmid pBR322DNA
at the BamHI site was generously supplied by D. Nathans. Transformation ofEscherichiacoli HB101 (3) byrecombinant molecules wasperformed
essen-tiallyasdescribedbyWensinketal.(20).Recombinant
plasmidsweregrown and purifiedasdescribed else-where (8)with the exceptionthat theG-100 column
fractionation was omitted. Propagation of recombi-872
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
nant DNA molecules was done in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines.
SV40and recombinant DNAs were labeled with 32P by nick translationessentially as described by Man-iatis etal. (16). The reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris-hydrochloride (pH 7.8), 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 17.5
i.M
each dGTP and TTP, 2.5 ,LMeach dATP anddCTP, 4.4 mCi each of[nP]dATP
and[32P]dCTP (specific activity, 400 to 600 Ci/mmol; Amersham Corp.), perml 10 ,ug of SV40 or
recombi-nant DNAperml, 175 U ofDNApolymerase I (Be-thesda ResearchLaboratories) per ml, and 0.012,ugof DNase I (Worthington Biochemicals Corp.) per ml. Reactions were carried outat 14°C and stopped by addition of EDTA to 30 mM, followed by phenol and chloroform extractions, when the incorporation of3P intoacid-precipitable material ceased.DNAwas sep-arated from soluble radioactive material by chroma-tographyon aSephadexG-75 column (1.2 by 10 cm)
runin10mM Tris(pH 7.4),0.1mMEDTA, and 100 mM NaCl. The final specific activity of the labeled
DNA was 4x 107to 20 x107cpm/,Lg.
Cell DNA. High-molecular-weight cell DNA was prepared byamodificationof the procedure of Gross-Bellardetal. (11). Confluent cells were harvested by scraping or trypsinization, washed in phosphate-buffered saline, and lysed by incubation in 10 mM Tris-hydrochloride (pH 7.9), 1 mMEDTA, 0.5% so-diumdodecyl sulfate (SDS), and0.1mg of proteinase K perml(Boehringer Mannheim Corp.)12to 16 h at 37°C. The lysate was extracted twice with an equal volume of phenol saturated with 0.1 M Tris-hydro-chloride (pH 8.6) followed by two extractions with chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1). After exhaustive dialysis against 10mMTris-hydrochloride (pH 7.4), 1 mMEDTA, and 10 mM NaCl, RNase A (Sigma Chem-icalCo.; DNase heat inactivated) was added to 40,ig/ ml, and theresulting solutionwasincubated for 2 h at 37°C. This was followed by addition of 0.1 mg of proteinase K per ml and incubation for1 h at 37°C. Aftertwophenol andtwochloroform-isoamyl alcohol extractions, the aqueous component was dialyzed against10mM Tris(pH 7.4) and1mMEDTA.DNA was concentrated either by spooling on a glass rod from 33%isopropyl alcohol-0.3 M NaCl or, in studies wheredetection of free viral DNAwasattempted, by ethanolprecipitation, followed by resuspension in 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4) and 1 mM EDTA. Final DNA concentrationsweredeterminedby absorbance at 260 nm or by the fluorometric method of Labarca and Paigen (15).
Restriction enzyme digestion. Digestion of transformed cellDNAbyendo R *BglIIandTaqIwas
performed in
200-pl
reaction mixtures containing 30,ugof DNA,10 mMTris-hydrochloride (pH 7.6),6mM
MgCl2, 6 mM2-mercaptoethanol and, forBglII and
TaqI digestions, 60and100 mM NaCl, respectively. Digestionswerefor3h at37°C forBglII andat65°C forTaqI.In acontrolreaction,30pgofSV40form I
and II DNA and30,ugof normalBALB/c3T3DNA weredigested under the above conditions.
Electrophoresis and transfer. Thirty
micro-grams ofdigestedcellDNA wasloadedinto aslot(6 by3by 10mm) in ahorizontal slab(20 by24by 1.0
cm) of0.7 or 1% agarose (Seakem or Sigma). One
adjacent slot contained a digested mixture of SV40 DNA and BALB/c 3T3 DNA (3 x 105 and 30 ug,
respectively) towhich, in somecases, form I and II
SV40 DNAwasadded. Another slot contained2,tg of Hind-III-digested phage ADNA.Electrophoresiswas
performedat 1V/cm (1% gels) or 2V/cm (0.7% gels) for 16hin thepreviously described buffer(7). After electrophoresis, the distribution of cell DNA
frag-ments andposition of theDNAfragments were doc-umented byphotography of the gel after staining with ethidiumbromide.
DNAwastransfered from thegelto anitrocellulose sheet (Schleicher & Schuell Co.) essentially as de-scribed by Southern (18). The DNA was denatured in thegelby immersion of thegelin0.5MNaOH-1.5M
NaCl for2h. TheNaOHwasneutralized by immersing thegel in1M Tris(pH 5)-3 M NaCl for2h. Transfer of denatured DNAtonitrocellulosewasmediatedby flow of 20x SSC (SSC is 0.15 M NaClplus 0.015 M
sodium citrate) through the gel over a 48-h period. After transfer, the filter was washed in 2x SSC and dried for2hat80°C under vacuum.
Hybridization.Thenitrocellulose sheets
contain-ing DNA weresoakedin 2xSSC and 1Ox Denhardt solution(Denhardt solution is 0.02% Ficoll, 0.02% pol-yvinyl pyrrolidine, and 0.02% bovineserumalbumin), 0.1%SDS, and50ugof heat-denatured salmon sperm DNA per mlfor4h at65°C. Hybridizationwascarried
out at68°C for65 to 72h inaplastic bag containing
0.05 M Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 (pH 6.5), 2x SSC, lx
Denhardt solution, 0.1% SDS, 50
jg
of denatured salmon sperm DNA per ml, 10% (wt/vol) dextransulfate,and30 to150ngof denatured32P-labeledSV40
DNA (viralorrecombinant; specific activity,4 x 107
to 20x 107cpm/,g).Afterhybridization,the nitrocel-lulose was washed in 2x SSC, 0.05 M Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 (pH 6.5), and 0.5% SDS for 4 hat 65°C. Afterdrying, thefilterwassubjected to autoradiogra-phy withanintensifyingscreenfor24 hto 3 weeks.
RESULTS
Derivation and biological properties of
celllines.All cell lines discussed in thisreport
werederivedfromasingle colonyoftransformed
cells. Oneday after infectionwith tsA58 virions
at avirus-to-cellratioof 2, 105BALB/c3T3cells
wereplatedina 10-cmculturedish. Four weeks
later,a
single
isolatedcolony
ofovergrowthwasselected for further
study.
With thistransfor-mation
procedure,
thefrequency
oftransforma-tionwas about 105 PFU per
transforming
unit.The unclonedprogeny of the
original
transfor-mation colony has been
designated
line B1-0.Thislinewas subjectedto cloning by
endpoint
dilution(seeMaterials and
Methods),
giving
risetolinesBl-la, -b, -c, and -d (see
pedigree, Fig.
1).One ofthese,Bl-ld,was
subjected
tofurthercloning to generate lines B1-2a,
-b,
-c, and -d.Finally,B1-3wascloned from B1-2a.
LineB1-0 and the majorityof clonesderived
from it
expressed
SV40Tantigens
anddisplayed
a
transfoIrmed
phenotypeasassessedby
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
cJX
m -~ o .0 am X m
Kb
2.0-7.5
52
-
3.6-2.8
-1.9
-i.T
-a
b
FIG. 1. SV40-specific sequences in DNA from lineBl-0 and its derivatives; autoradiogram of 32P-labeled SV40 DNAhybridizedtocellDNAfragmentsgenerated by endoR. TaqI cleavage, separated by electropho-resis in1.0%oagarosegels,transferredtonitrocellulose sheets, and hybridizedto32P-labeledSV40 DNAas
described in Materials and Methods. The cell linesfromwhich DNAwasisolatedareindicatedatthe topof eachslot,asis therelationship of the cell linestoeachother.Slot M containsamarkerof linear SV40 DNA generated by TaqI digestion ofcircular SV40 DNA in the presence of BALBIc 3T3 DNA. The size (in kilobases)ofseveralfragmentsasdeterminedfromthemobility of A DNAfragmentsin the samegel is shown
attheleft. (a)SV40-specific fragmentsinBl-0 and its clonal derivatives; (b)SV40-specific fragments in BI-ld and its clonal derivatives.
tion density, ability to grow in soft agar, and
abilitytoovergrownormalmonolayers (datanot
presented). The two exceptions were B1-2a and
itssubclone B1-3,whose growth characteristics
resembled those of normal BALB/c 3T3 cells
and which did not contain SV40 T antigens
detectable by immunoprecipitation. Detailed
characterization of thesetwotransformation
re-vertantswill bedescribed in a subsequent com-munication.
SV40sequence arrangement in cell DNA.
To investigatethe stability of SV40 sequences
intransformed cellsand to attempt a
determi-nation of thebasis for the spontaneous evolution
of the transformation revertants, the
high-mo-lecular-weight
DNAs from each of the cell lineswere analyzed byrestriction digestion followed
byhybridizationto32P-labeledSV40DNA.
Fig-ure 1 shows results of hybridization of SV40
DNA to cell DNAsdigested by TaqI. This
re-striction endonuclease cleaves once within the
SV40 genome. The pattern of integration of
SV40 sequences in the original transformant,
B1-0, was complex (Fig. 1). Therewere over a
dozen distinct SV40-specific fragments, and
these varied considerably in radioautographic
intensity. Onefragmenthadthe
mobility
oflin-earSV40DNA(5.2 kilobases[kb])and could be
derivedfrom either free viral DNAor
integrated
viral DNA present inatandem array. The
large
numberof distinct
SV40-specific
fragmentspres-entmayreflectmultiplerearrangementsofviral
I -9
la cj .0 0
"Y
IN
"I
Im
E
ai
a
roon November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:3.495.117.404.71.407.2]sequences, multiple sites of integration of viral
DNA within cellDNA, or both. The variation in
intensity of these fragmentsmay be due to
dif-ferent amounts ofSV40DNA in different
frag-ments, reiteration of someSV40-containing
frag-ments, heterogeneity of the transformed-cell
population, or all three. Additional analyses
(datanotpresented) revealed that the intensity
of certain fragments relative to others varied
with the number of passages cells had undergone
atthe time of DNA extraction.
To further investigate the nature of SV40
integration in B1-0 cells, the arrangement of
viralsequences inlinesBl-la,-b, -c,and-d was
analyzed by TaqI digestion and hybridization.
Theselines,allof which wereclonedfromB1-0,
showedasimplificationinpattern of SV40DNA
integration (Fig. 1). Each clone retained some
SV40-specific fragments havingthe same
elec-trophoretic mobilityasfragmentsin theparental
line (e.g., the 7.5-, 2.8-, 1.8-, and 1.5-kb, aswell
as the5.2-kb,fragments)but each hadlostother
fragments (e.g., the 3.6-kb fragment in Bl-ld
and Bl-lc and the 12.0- and1.7-kb fragments in
all Bl-1lines).Inaddition,eachclonecontained
adistinctmajor bandnotdetectedinthe parent
(e.g., the 8.0- and 3.5-, 3.5- and 1.6-, 3.2-, and
1.9-kb fragments in Bl-ld, -c, -b, and -a,
respec-tively). Moreover, the integration pattern in
each clone was distinctfrom that found in the
other three.
It appears, then, that line B1-0 is not a
ho-mogeneous population. Heterogeneity of this
line could result from the presence of several
distinct primary transformants. This does not
appear tobealikely explanation,since B1-0 was
selected as awell-isolated colony from cells
in-fected at arelatively lowvirus-to-cell ratio. On
the other hand, the observed heterogeneity
could result from rearrangement of viral
se-quences afterintegration. Indeed, thepresence
of certaincommonbandsinall four B1-1 clones
andtheparental transformantindicates that the
four clones have in fact evolved from a
single
primary transformant and are not merely
de-rivedfromamixedpopulation of several primary
transformants. This conclusion is further
sub-stantiatedbytheresults of
analysis
ofthe DNAinlines derivedfrom one of thesecondary cell
lines, Bl-ld. The pattern of TaqI-generated
DNAfragmentscontainingSV40sequenceshad
been further altered in linesB1-2a, -b, -c (Fig.
1). Each line retained at least one fragment
whosemobility corresponded tothat of a
frag-ment in theBl-ld and B1-0 progenitors. Each
had lost at leastoneparental fragment,andtwo
lines contained fragments not detected in the
Bl-ld parent. The transformationrevertant
B1-2a and its subclone B1-3 had a
single
majorSV40-specific fragment. Analysis of SV40
se-quencesinthe clonesderived from asecondary
line, then, revealedalterations qualitatively
sim-ilar to those observed in the initial cloning. All
seven clones and subclones derived from B1-0
showed related but distinct patterns of SV40
sequencearrangement. Thus, the diverse
inte-gration patterns in the various cell lines
ap-peared to have a common origin.
To confirm the results obtained by TaqI
digestionofthe various cellDNAs and to
deter-mine the number ofSV40 integration sites in
each cellline, the cellDNAs were analyzed by
BglII digestion.Thisenzymedoesnotcleavethe
SV40genome. Cell DNAfragments containing
SV40 sequences are therefore generated when
BglIIcutscell sequencesadjacent tointegrated
viral DNA; the number of SV40-specific bands
in agivencellline DNA indicates the number of
sitesat whichSV40 was integrated within that
cell line. Figure2shows theresult of
hybridiza-tion of SV40 DNA to cell DNAs digested by
BglII.Nofreeviral genomes weredetected,since
noSV40-specific fragmentswere seenmigrating
with the mobility of closed circular (I), open
circular (II), or linear (L) SV40 DNA. As
ex-pected,the number ofSV40-specific fragments
present in the variouscelllines wassmallerthan
wasthecasewithTaqI cleavage.Inthemajority
oflines, however, SV40 DNA wasintegratedat
morethanonesite.Again,aswithTaqI analysis,
anevolutioninthearrangement ofSV40-specific
fragments was observed. The various cell lines
had distinctive but related SV40 sequence
ar-rangements. In most cases, sisterclonesshared
some common parental fragments, lacked
oth-ers, and containedone or more newfragments.
The evolution of new arrangements of SV40
sequencesobservedin boththe TaqIandBglII
analyses indicated that at least some of the
observed arrangements of
integrated
SV40se-quences wereunstable.
Assessment of free viral DNA. The
ob-served
reorganization
ofintegrated
viralse-quences inSV40-transformedcells
might
beme-diated by free SV40 genomes.
TaqI
digestion
(seeFig. 1)of DNA from all cell lines except the
revertants
generated
SV40-specific fragments
having the
electrophoretic
mobility
ofunit-length linear SV40 DNA. The
linear-length
SV40-specific fragments observed here
might
haveresulted from TaqI
digestion
of either freeviral genomes or
tandemly
integrated
SV40DNA. That the latter situation is the case is
indicated by
analysis
of theSV40-specific
cellDNAfragments
generated by
BglIl.
Afterdiges-tion ofcell DNAs with
BglII,
noSV40-specific
bands
comigrating
withSV40formI,
formII,
orlinear DNA was observed
(Fig. 2);
unit-length
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Kb
27.s-
15-L
ID
I
1
I I IE
>:
mm
mn
mn
di
m
nI
23-2..O
FIG. 2. Autoradiogram of 3P-labeledSV40 DNAhybridizedtocell DNAfragments generated byendo
R-BglIIandseparated byelectrophoresis in0.7%agarose.Slot M contains markersofclosed circular(I),linear
(L), and open circular(II)SV40 DNAs which have been addedtoBglII-digestedBALBIc 3T3 DNA. The size (in kilobases) and positionofA DNAHindIIIfragmentsinthesamegelareshownattheleft.On shorter exposure,six distinctSV40-specific bands larger than6.7kbaredetectable in line Bl-0.
SV40fragments, then, weregenerated by TaqI
cleavage oftandem arrays ofSV40 sequences.
ThecellDNAsused inthese analyses, however,
were prepared byspooling from isopropanol, a
procedure which might exclude the extraction of
low-molecular-weightviral DNA. To circumvent
this possibility, DNA extracted from several
lineswas concentrated by ethanol precipitation
rather thanbyspooling and subjected to
diges-tionbyBglII. Nofree viral DNA was detected
in any ofthe lines tested (Fig. 3). This procedure
should becapable of detecting an average of one
free viral genome per cell. We cannot rule out
the presenceof lesser amounts of free viral DNA.
DISCUSSION
The arrangement ofintegrated viral sequences
in a primary isolate of SV40-transformed cells
andin thecellscloned from it has been
analyzed.
This analysis has revealed differences in the
arrangementof viral sequences when individual
clonesare
compared
with each other and withtheir progenitors. Thesedifferences are
attrib-utedto rearrangements of the
integrated
viralsequencessubsequenttotheprimary
integration
event, and not to different sequence
arrange-mentsin a mixed populationof
primary
trans-formants,forseveralreasons.First,the
primary
transformantwasselectedas awell-isolated
col-ony derived from cells infected at a
relatively
low virus-to-cell ratio. Ifno rearrangement
oc-curred afterintegration,thento accountfor the
various patterns ofintegration observed in the
variouscell lines, the primary
colony
oftrans-formation would havetobe amixture ofmore
than eight different transformants.
Second,
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:5.495.139.383.72.423.2]REARRANGEMENT OF SV40 SEQUENCES 877
a
O
',
co
"I
m lm m m
7-I
FIG. 3. SV40-specificDNAinBl-Oandit8 serially
clonedderivativelines. The analysiswasperformed asinFig.2 exceptthatcellDNAswerenotspooled fromisopropanol (see Materials and Methods) before digestionwithendoR.BglII. Thespoolingstepwas
omittedtoenhance thepossibilityof recovering free
viralgenomes. SlotMcontains closedcircular (I),
linear(L),andopencircular(I) SV40DNA.
clone Bl-ldwasderived from theprimary
trans-formantby endpoint dilution cloning, yetgave
rise to four subclones with different viral
se-quence arrangements. Finally, the presence in
various clones ofcommonSV40-containing
frag-mentssuggests that these clones share a com-mon ancestry. The evolution of new
arrange-mentsofSV40DNA in these various cell lines
indicates,then, thatatleastsomearrangements
ofintegrated SV40sequences areunstable.
Ap-parently, during the establishment of at least
thetwoprogenitor lines,B1-0andBl-ld,certain
viral sequences have been rearranged in some
cells. The minorspecies ofSV40-specific frag-mentsinthe digestsofparental DNA (see Fig.
1)presumably reflect such arrangements.
Rear-rangementsbecome more obvious when the viral
sequencesin progeny clones are analyzed.
In the series of cells analyzed here, certain
arrangements of SV40 sequences appear to be
more stable than others. Forexample,the
BglII-generated fragment (see Fig. 2) migrating with
asize of 6.3 kbappears in all four Bl-1 lines and
inB1-2aandB1-3.Retention of certain
arrange-ments of viralsequences might afford the host
cell aselective growthadvantage. Itis not
read-ily apparent, however, that this is the case for
the example just cited. Lines B1-2 and B1-3
contain SV40 sequences integrated at a single
site in the host DNA (i.e., within the 6.3-kb
BglII fragment). T antigens, however, are not
expressed in these linesbecausetheSV40 early
coding region is not intact (M. A. Bender and
W. W.Brockman, unpublisheddata).As aresult,
B1-2 and B1-3 havegrowthproperties similarto
thoseofnormalBALB/c3T3cells.Ontheother
hand, whether SV40 sequences are retained or
lost may be determined by the nature of the
cellular sequences to which the SV40 DNA is
linked orby the absence or presence of tandem
duplicationsof viralsequences (see below).
ComparisonofSV40-specificrestrictiondigest
patterns of theprogeny clonesdescribedinthis
communication relative with those ofthe
pri-mary transfornantreveals two types of
altera-tions: (i)loss of certainSV40-specific fragments
and(ii) acquisitionof new
SV40-containing
frag-ments. Loss of SV40-specific fragments could
result from loss ofentirechromosomesorfrom
deletion of smaller segments ofDNA. The
ap-pearance of new SV40-containing fragments
may result from point mutation at restriction
sites or from deletions within either SV40 or
flankingcellsequences. On theother
hand,
newfragments might arise from transposition of
SV40sequenceseither aloneoraccompanied
by
flanking
cell sequences. The presence oftan-demly integrated SV40 sequences in line B1-0
and its progeny clones suggests that
complete
copies of viral DNA might be released by
ho-mologous recombination between
duplicated
re-gions of viral DNA
(13).
Free SV40 genomesgeneratedinthis fashion
might
thenintegrate
atothersiteswithin the cell DNA. In thecaseof
the related
virus,
polyoma,
free viral genomes(1, 2) and their apparent excision from tandem
arrays of integrated viral sequences
(1)
havebeendetected in
semipermissive
ratcells. In thepresent and earlier studies (17),
however,
freeviral DNA isnot
physically
detectable inSV40-transformed
nonpermissive
mouse cells.Daya-Grosjean and Monier
(10),
in contrast,using
abiologicalassay have
reported
thedetection,
inoneSV40-transformedmouse
line,
of low levelson November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:6.495.83.204.77.422.2](<0.005 molecule/cell) of infectious material
having the buoyant densityof form ISV40 DNA.
Although we are unable to detect free SV40
genomes in the cells we have examined, we
cannotexcludethe possibility that the observed
rearrangements of integrated SV40 sequences
aremediatedby excisionorintegration (or both)
ofasmallnumber of free viral genomes.
Alter-natively, transposition of SV40 sequencesmight
be facilitatedby integration adjacentto
reiter-ated sequences ormovable elements in the cell
DNA. In such cases, rearrangement of SV40
sequences might result from (i) recombination
facilitated by homology between flanking cell
DNA andsequences repeated elsewhere inthe
cell genome or (ii) transposition of a movable
element together with covalently linked viral
sequences. Ifsuch mechanisms wereoperative,
it might be expected that the arrangement of
integrated SV40 in some transformants would
be stable whereas those in otherswould be
la-bile, depending on the proximity of the viral
sequences to reiterated sequences or movable
elements.Indeed,asnotedabove,in the present
studysomeSV40sequence arrangements appear
to be more stable than others. Theprevalence
of labile associations between SV40 and cell
DNA in transformed cellsaswellasthe
relation-ship oflability ofSV40 integration patterns to
the presence oftandemly integratedviral DNA
andtothe nature ofadjacent cell sequences is
presently under investigation.
In previous studiesofthe integration of SV40
DNA in rodent cellDNA (4, 5, 14; Ketner and
Kelly, in press), transformants, which after
re-cloning atleast once were found to have
rela-tivelysimplepatternsofSV40 integration, were
analyzed in some detail. Conclusions regarding
thelack of site specificity for SV40 integration
were based on the assumption that
rearrange-mentof the integrated viral DNA does not occur
after the primary integration event. More
re-cently,twolaboratories have found thatcellular
DNA sequences flanking integrated SV40
se-quencesare notcolinear in thenontransformed
parentalcell line(4; P.Mounts and T. J.Kelly,
personal communication), indicating that
rear-rangementofcellsequenceshas occurred
coin-cident with or after the initial recombination
betweenSV40and cell DNAs. This finding,
to-getherwiththe data presented in this
commu-nication, suggests that the arrangement of SV40
sequences present in serially cloned, stable
transformants may represent the cumulative
re-sult ofeventsoccurring after the primary
inte-grationevent.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
WethankJoanChristensen forexcellent technical
assist-ance and Phoebe Mounts and T. J. Kelly for theiraid in mastering theintricacies of DNA transfer andhybridization.
M.A.B.istherecipient ofanF.G.Novypredoctoral fellow-ship.This work wassupported byPublic Health Servicegrant CA-19816 from theNational Institutes of Health.
LITERATURE CITED
1. Basilico, C., S. Gattoni, D. Zouzias, and G. Della Valle. 1979. Lossofintegrated viral DNA sequencesin polyoma-transformedcells is associated with anactive viral A function. Cell 17:645-659.
2. Birg, F.,R.Dulbecco,M.Fried,and R. Kamen. 1979. State and organization of polyoma virus DNA se-quences intransformedratcell lines. J. Virol. 29:633-648.
3. Bolivar, F., R. Rodriguez, M. Betlach, and H. W. Boyer.1977.Constructionand characterization ofnew vehicles. I.Ampicillin-resistant derivatives of the plas-midpMB9.Gene2:75-93.
4. Botchan, M., S.Stringer, T. Mitchison, andJ. Sam-brook. 1980. Integration and excisionofSV40 DNA from thechromosome of atransformed cell. Cell20: 143-152.
5. Botchan,M., W. Topp, andJ.Sambrook. 1976.The arrangement ofSV40 sequencesinthe DNA of trans-formedcells. Cell9:269-287.
6. Brockman,W. W.1978.Transformation ofBALB/c-3T3
cells by tsA mutantsofsimianvirus 40: temperature sensitivity of the transformedphenotype and retrans-formationbywild-type virus. J. Virol. 25:860-870. 7. Brockman,W.W.,andD.Nathans.1974.The isolation
of simian virus 40 variants with specifically altered genomes.Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71:942-946. 8. Dagaiczyk, A.,and S. L. C. Woo. 1980.Mappingand
cloning ofeukaryoticgenes, p.1-38.In W. T. Schrader andB. W.O'Malley (ed.), Laboratorymethods manual for hormone action andmolecularendocrinology, 4th ed. Texas MedicalCenter,Houston.
9. Danna, K.J.,and D. Nathans.1971.Specific cleavage of simian virus40DNAbyrestrictionendonuclease of Hemophilusinfluenzae. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci.U.S.A. 68:2913-2917.
10. Daya-Grosjean, L.,and R. Monier. 1978.Presence of freeviral DNA in simianvirus40-transformed nonpro-ducer cells.J.Virol. 27:307-312.
11. Gross-Bellard, M.,P.Oudet,and P. Chambon.1973. Isolation ofhigh molecularweight DNAfrom mam-malian cells. Eur.J.Biochem. 36:32-38.
12. Kelley,S.,M. A.Bender,and W. W. Brockman. 1980. TransformationofBalb/c-3T3 cells bytsA mutants of simian virus 40: effect of transformation technique on the transformedphenotype. J. Virol. 33:550-552. 13. Kelly,T.J.,A. M.Lewis, A. S. Levine, andS.Siegel.
1974.Structure oftwoadenovirussimian virus 40 hy-bridswhich contain the entireSV40 genome. J. Mol. Biol.89:113-126.
14. Ketner,G., and T. J. Kelly. 1976. Integrated simian virus 40sequencesin transformedcell DNA:analysis usingrestrictionendonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.73:1102-1106.
15. Labarca,C.,and K.Paigen.1980.Asimple, rapid,and sensitive DNAassayprocedure. Anal. Biochem. 102: 344-352.
16.Maniatis, T., A.Jeffrey, andD. G.Kleid.1975. Nu-cleotidesequence of therightward operatorofphage A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A.72:1184-1188. 17. Sambrook, J., H.Westphal,P. R.Srinivasan, andR.
Dulbecco. 1968. Theintegratedstateof viral DNA in SV40-transformedcells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 60:1288-1295.
18. Southern,E. 1975. Detection ofspecific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J. Mol. Biol. 98:503-515.
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
19.Tooze,J. 1980.Transformation by simian virus40 and 20. Wensink,P.C.,D.J.Finnegan,J. E.Donelson,and polyomavirus, p. 205-296. In The molecularbiology of D. S. Hogness. 1974. A system for mapping DNA tumorviruses, vol. 2, 2nd ed. ColdSpring Harbor Lab- sequencesin thechromosomes ofDrosophila melano-oratory, ColdSpring Harbor,N.Y. gaster.Cell3:315-325.