Assessment, technology and democratic education in the age of data

0
0
6
1 month ago
PDF Preview
Full text
(1)This is a repository copy of Assessment, technology and democratic education in the age of data. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/84264/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Perrotta, C (2013) Assessment, technology and democratic education in the age of data. Learning Media and Technology, 38 (1). 116 - 122. ISSN 1743-9884 https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.752384. Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.. eprints@whiterose.ac.uk https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/.

(2) Assessment, technology and democratic education in the age of data Carlo Perrotta. Learning Media & Technology Author Accepted Manuscript accepted 20 Nov 2012. Abstract This paper contends that powerful techniques to manipulate data, enabled by technological and economic developments, can be easily co-opted to serve the restrictive frameworks of hyper-controlling, managerial accountability that characterise current cultures of summative assessment in education. In response to these challenges, research is urgently needed to increase our understanding of the impact that assessments have on individuals and society. The paper concludes that social research ought to contribute to the identification of responses – educational, technological and political - that can minimize inequalities and potential abuses through the encouragement of data literacy across society.. Introduction This paper argues that the increasing globalisation and sophistication of educational assessment is inextricably linked to the ‘technologisation’ of education more broadly. Technologisation is understood here as the process of engineering institutional cultures in pursuit of technocratic ideals of performance and efficiency (i.e. ‘performativity’, see Fairclough, 1996; Lyotard, 1984). The ‘technologisation of education through assessment’ is taking on problematic connotations which call for socially orientated forms of research and new approaches to the design and the use of technologies in education. As noted by Broadfoot and Black (2004), the field of educational assessment has seen many dramatic developments over the last decades, and a growing number of national contexts are now grappling with similar issues, such as how to effectively manage the transition of large numbers of students from secondary education to increasingly selective and/or economically challenged higher education (HE) sectors. Data from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)1 clearly point to a trend of steady increase in access to HE in most countries – certainly the UK and the US - but similar trends can be discerned across Europe (with the exception of some countries in the southern EU regions where ever deeper socio-economic crises are beginning to impact on the capabilities of local institutions and on levels of public confidence)2. As a result of such trends the traditional function of assessment - the high-stakes summative evaluation of large student populations to inform key decisions and choices - is now more important than 1. http://stats.oecd.org/. In the UK education sector, very recent figures - from 2012 – also seem to suggest a decrease in HE enrolment. However, these have been explained as fluctuations reflecting normal variations in population rates rather than the current economic challenges; certainly not enough to abate the chronic issue of applications exceeding places available (UCAS, 2012).. 2. 1.

(3) ever, at the expense of its formative, developmental function (Black at al., 2010). This growing relevance also relates to the rise of a so-called ‘supranational’ educational discourse (Stromquist, 2005), which unsurprisingly found in assessment the vehicle through which national policy agendas can be influenced; hence the authority that international organisations, institutions and corporations - the already cited OECD, consortia and alliances of global employers – can nowadays exert (Ozga et al., 2011). These developments are accompanied by what could be called a ‘proliferation’ of data in educational assessment, and by a growing interest in technologies that allow the management and exploitation of huge amounts of information produced by increasingly complex systems and processes. For instance, ‘learning analytics’ is an approach that relies on automated computations to make sense of large datasets about different aspects of student performance and behaviour in formal education. Similarly, quite a lot of research has been carried out in recent years about games and simulations capable of collecting information about learners in real time, as they perform tasks and solve problems while engaging in ‘intrinsically motivating’ activities (Shute et al, 2009). Moving on from this background, three more specific assumptions can be defined, which have growing relevance in education - and beyond – and demand with increasing urgency new forms of scholarship to inform policy and practice: a) the introduction of more sophisticated methods of data collection and analysis. Unsurprisingly, these techniques are beginning to be commercialised in compulsory education (especially in the US) as they appear to offer the promise of accurate predictions, personalised recommendations and dramatic increases in the efficiency and effectiveness of provision (e.g. SAS 2011). This trend is spearheaded by recent developments in the digital economy, where consumer data analytics is currently one of the most profitable sectors. Attempting a forecast based on previous trends in educational technology, where many innovations have been predated by developments in other sectors of the economy (the personal computer in the 1980s, the push for connectivity and the Internet in 1990s, mobile devices and smartphones in the 2000s), it could be argued that powerful analysis of student data is where significant investment is likely to be found in the near future. Now, the need to make data machine-readable (capable of being processed and modelled by computers) makes it also very likely that any foreseeable development will rely on readily quantifiable information: test scores, attendance rates, time on task and completion rates during exercises. b) The emergence of new roles and forms of expertise in the process of collection and analysis of performance data, which runs the risks of weakening even further existing educational institutions. For instance, a range of organisations and corporations are beginning to directly or indirectly provide educational services, qualifications and assessments (Mansell, 2012); this raises questions in terms of uncontrolled access to sensitive information that could be easily used to make important decisions about individuals or groups (e.g. as part of a recruitment process). More seriously, intensive data use and the need to rely on complex technologies and specialist (often non-educational) expertise may lead to a situation which replaces democratic accountability with managerial and technocratic one, thus reducing the possibility of building responsibility around social goals and democratic processes (Ozga, 2009). Ozga suggests that within an assessment framework with a strong focus on data collection, comparison and diagnosis in the service of performativity, schools may become subjected to a ‘relentless and inescapable’ scrutiny (ibid:155) taking place outside of their sphere of control. A process of increasing sophistication will likely lead to the development of large ‘data warehouses’, or the proliferation of public/private initiatives to find ways to increase efficiencies. Through these initiatives schools may be seduced by the promise of costs savings and by the powerful tools to monitor and improve performance, but may also be relegated to being ‘end users’ of complex systems and procedures, in which deceptively simple interfaces hide the problematic data manipulations performed ‘under the hood’ on remote servers. c) As data-hungry digital media become pervasive and ubiquitous, beliefs associated with privacy and the ownership of personal information need to be revised to meet the demands of the changing socioeconomic landscape. Commentators have suggested that digital media have now become fundamental tools in dynamics of social interaction, personal identity and network building. As these tools penetrate their users’ lives, not only do the mechanisms on which they rely tend to become invisible and taken for granted, they also overtly or covertly require a more fluid and negotiable attitude towards valuable personal information. It is no secret that there are significant interests 2.

(4) surrounding the commercial uses of such information, and as a representative of the US Consumer Electronics Association observed: "The mining of personal data is here to stay; there is just too much money at stake to imagine otherwise” (quoted in Shiels, 2010). In response to this seemingly unavoidable economic necessity, corporate actors are actively advocating the commoditisation of personal data, whereby consumers are expected to embrace the opportunities that are currently arising by authorising the use of their information and carrying out ‘advantageous’ business deals (Boothe et al, 2010). As more critically minded commentators have observed, there are a number of issues likely to arise from this exchange model, where the promise of ill-defined benefits can obscure the very real threats associated with the loss and the misuse of personal data (Debatin et al, 2009; Acquisti and Gross, 2006; Jagatic et al, 2005; ). For educational institutions, this may translate in unreflective and instrumentalist forms of behaviour, whereby the promised gains in terms of efficiency and impact on performance conceal the trade-offs of treating student data as if they were removed from the socio-cultural contexts in which they originate.. The challenges ahead Moving on from the assumptions described in the previous section, I would like to suggest now that powerful techniques to manipulate data can be easily co-opted to serve the restrictive frameworks of competitive, hyper-controlling, managerial accountability that characterise current cultures of summative assessment in many countries. In fact, recent technological developments may work against the inclusion of more sophisticated forms of evidence, such as those that assume constructivist and collaborative epistemologies, since the emphasis on machine-readable information tends to cause overreliance on quantifiable data (Hildebrandt, 2010). As Theodore Porter reasoned back in 1995: “Quantitative technologies to investigate social and economic life work best if the world they aim to describe can be remade in their image (...) quantification is simultaneously a means of planning and of prediction” (Porter, 1995: 43). As such, decontextualized analysis of student data, and the powerful performativity arguments that underpin them, may subvert concerns for social equity and justice. Computer-generated predictions could be used to rationalize and/or conceal the ‘weeding out’ of students at risk of underperforming, or – on the other hand to create implicit barriers to access for specific groups. Although such consequences are by no means linked to accountability per se, they have been observed when strong competition has pushed educational institutions to pursue homogeneous social milieus, therefore exacerbating differences on the basis of class and race (Anushek & Raymond, 2005). Even the often genuine preference of educators for progressive pedagogies and collaborative, dialogic technologies, does not seem viable in the current accountability regimes; unless said pedagogies and tools present opportunities for data mining, analysis and comparison. A clarification is due at this point: there are no intrinsic, ‘essential’ qualities to data which, in absolute terms, will bring about troubling consequences. There are in fact positive aspects associated with models for data analysis that afford more granular forms of evaluations. For example, there is evidence indicating that students may benefit from a more adaptive and fast remedial action, which can obviously be facilitated by the computer-assisted analysis of achievement and behavioural data (Hepplestone et al, 2011).This caveat notwithstanding, there remains a compelling reason to identify more responsible and equitable strategies to deal with the issues described thus far. It is proposed here that one of such strategies should be a research and policy agenda that aims to encourage ‘data literacy’ across schools and local communities. The components of this type of literacy will need to be defined and rigorously evaluated, but will involve elements of digital literacy, citizenship and varying degrees of methodological knowledge, which together arguably represent a crucial ‘21st century skill’ for a more active and informed participation not only in education, but in many other domains increasingly characterised by pervasive data collection and manipulation. As assessments and ways to evaluate, measure and categorise people become ever more pervasive and ‘high-stakes’ – with similar principles and technologies at work in education and in several other domains - can we teach young people, their parents and educators how to read these principles and technologies in order to ask questions about the models and assumptions that underpin them? 3.

(5) Responding the challenges: a research agenda In this final section, I would like to argue that the global trends in assessment – and the related technological developments described so far, may contribute to the encroachment of education systems around increasingly restrictive and punishing forms of accountability, whereby alternative forms of evidence are impossible to consider. Not only because they cannot be readily quantified and included in the machinereadable models, but most importantly because educators and learners may become ill-equipped to recognise them, even in purely conceptual terms, as the computer-generated predictions and diagnoses have the potential to colonise all aspects of the educational discourse. In response to these issues, it is proposed here that researchers and technologists should begin to engage more critically with the socio-economic and cultural dynamics that underpin the design of educational assessments. This engagement will then inform a more critical agenda for research and policy. Ideally, such a research effort will set forth from the development of a theoretically informed critique of the socio-economic dynamics that ‘use’ assessment to pursue an agenda of globalisation and technologisation. It will then move on to explore notions of assessment literacy and data literacy, investigating the ability, the language and the culturally acquired predispositions that help individuals, groups and possibly whole institutions develop a whole range of empowering, critical and informed responses when faced with pervasive and ‘high-stakes’ forms of evaluation. The ultimate aim would not be to inform assessments per se but to increase our understanding of the impact that assessments have on individuals and society beyond their intended ones; and to suggest appropriate responses that can minimize inequalities and potential abuses.. References Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on Facebook. Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2006, Volume 4258/2006, pp. 36-58. Anushek, E.& Raymond, M. (2005). Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), pp. 297–327. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall B. & Serret, N. (2010). Validity in teachers’ summative assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), pp. 215-232. Boothe, J., Chisholm, M., Cutts. J., DuBravac, S., Joseph, D. Murphy, S. & Slater, C. (2010). Five Technology Trends to Watch. VISION Special Supplement, CEA - Consumer Electronics Association. Retrieved 30th January 2012 from http://www.ce.org/PDF/2K11_5tech_web.pdf Broadfoot, P., Black, P (2004). Redefining assessment? The first ten years of assessment in education , Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11:1, 7-26. Debatin, D., Lovejoy, J.P., Horn, A.K., Hughes, B. (2009). Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15 (1), pp. 83108. Fairclough, N. (1996). Technologisation of discourse, in C Caldas-Coulthard & M Coulthard (eds), Texts and Practices, London: Routledge. Hepplestone, S., Holden, G. Irwin, B., Parkin, H.J. & Louise Thorpe, L. (2011): Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 19:2, pp. 117-127. Hildebrandt, M. (2010). The Meaning and the Mining of Legal Texts. Presentation at The Computational Turn in the Humanities. Swansea University. March 2010.. 4.

(6) Jagatic, T., Johnson, N., Jakobsson, M. & Menczer, F. (2005). Social phishing. December 12, 2005, Indiana University, Bloomington. Retrieved October, 28, 2012 from http://www.indiana.edu/ phishing/socialnetwork-experiment/phishing-preprint.pdf Lyotard, J.F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition. University of Manchester Press. Mansell, W. (2012). Should Pearson, a giant multinational, be influencing our education policy? Retrieved October, 28, 2012, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/jul/16/pearson-multinationalinfluence-education-poliy Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: from regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), pp. 149-162. Ozga, J., Dahler-Larsen, P. Segerholm, C. & Simola, H. (2011). Fabricating Quality in Europe: data and education governance. London: Routledge. Stromquist, N. (2005) Comparative and International Education: A Journey toward Equality and Equity Harvard Educational Review Vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 89-111. SAS (2011). Ensuring Effective Data Use in Education How SAS® Solutions Can Help You Execute the DQC’s Recommended 10 State Actions to Meet NCES Directives. SAS Institute Inc. Shiels. M. (2010). Personal data could become commodity. Retrieved October, 28, 2012, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11571513 Shute, V., Ventura, M., Bauer, M. & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2009). Melding the Power of Serious Games and Embedded Assessment to Monitor and Foster Learning – Flow and Grow. In Ritterfeld, U. Cody, M.J., Vorderer, P. (eds) (2009), Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects, NY: Routledge.. 5.

(7)

New documents

Are Your Students Flipping Prepared?
Laboratory quiz scores, percentage of weekly videos watched, multiple video views, and reported student preparedness were compared between groups.. The results showed statistically
Peer Health Coach Training Practicum: Evidence from a Flipped Classroom
These preliminary results support the utility of a flipped classroom practicum course designed to teach undergraduate students the skills of MI; however, extended practice with the use
Towards a Systematic Approach to Big Data Benchmarking
Solution Statement Apply the multidimensional multifaceted Ogre classification to characterize Big Data applications and benchmarks Study the benchmarking process in existing Big Data
Plasma inverse scattering theory
In this section we use the equations describing the time dependent fields inside the plasma to derive an integral equation relating the reflected wave to the plasma density.. The
Outcomes of a Course Design Workshop Series Implemented in a Team Based and Diverse Classroom Setting
In this course, the graduate students and postdoctoral fellows from widely divergent backgrounds at Iowa State University designed a new course related to their own research
Big Data Applications, Software, Hardware and Curricula
• Proposed classification of Big Data applications with features generalized as facets and kernels for analytics • Data intensive algorithms do not have the well developed high
Ab Initio and Experimental Techniques for Studying Non Stoichiometry and Oxygen Transport in Mixed Conducting Oxides
2, ab initio calculations are integrated with lattice Monte Carlo simulations to predict, for the first time, the phase diagram and macroscopic thermodynamic properties such as
Classification of Big Data Applications and Implications for the Algorithms and Software Needed for Scalable Data Analytics
• Proposed classification of Big Data applications and Benchmarks with features generalized as facets • Data intensive algorithms do not have the well developed high performance
Microfluidic technolgies for continuous culture and genetic circuit characterization
In other words, the chemostat culture gravitates toward a steady state condition, during which the microbial growth rate is just sufficient to replenish the cells lost in the effluent
Network Coding and Distributed Compression over Large Networks: Some Basic Principles
This work investigates several new approaches to bounding the achievable rate region for general network source coding problems - reducing a network to an equivalent network or

Related documents

The Legal and Ethical Environment of Business
Figure 13.5 The Horizontal and Vertical Nature of Contract Relationships in the Global Legal Environment KEY TAKEAWAYS While international law between sovereign
0
3
421
Introduction to the Law of Property, Estate Planning and Insurance
With the choice thus unchallenged, we must apply both established New York law as well as our belief of how the New York Court of Appeals would rule if this case
0
1
703
Copy(write): Intellectual Property in the Writing Classroom
Because of these implications of nonauthorship status, technical communication instructors would do well to teach students about authorship from two perspectives:
0
1
434
Critical Expressivism: Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom
A new expressivist approach to writing instruction might require teachers to develop strategies that allow a lot of classroom space for low-stakes writing and give
0
0
319
History in the Making: A History of the People of the United States of America to 1877
Grant defeated Horatio Seymour in the presidential race february 1869 Fifteenth Amendment passed by Congress December 1869 Grant encouraged Congress to readmit
0
9
864
The Ideologies of Lived Space in Literary Texts, Ancient and Modern
ideologies.lived.spaces.book Page 229 Saturday, August 17, 2013 11:47 AM 229 Writing space, living space Time, agency and place relations in Herodotus’s Histories1
0
4
261
Teaching Autoethnography: Personal Writing in the Classroom
Writing Essays for Class: The First Steps 27 “I am so weird that I could never tell on the page what is really, secretly going on in my mind.” “I am so boring,
0
0
282
Literature, the Humanities, and Humanity
Literature, the Humanities, and Humanity Bleak House the novel does deal with themes that are present in other Dickens novels.. Still, most of Dickens’ works are
0
0
232
PDX Journeys: Studying and Living in the US, Low-Intermediate Novel and Textbook for University ESL Students
Unit 1: Academic Expectations Bliss Calderón Chapter 2: IELP Expectations of Students Part 1: Preview AWL Vocabulary Preparation The following Academic Word List
0
0
107
Steps to Success: Crossing the Bridge Between Literacy Research and Practice
Learning Objectives After reading this chapter, readers will be able to • identify methods and approaches to world language education over time and their attention
0
4
233
Reading With My Eyes Open: Embracing the critical and the personal in language pedagogy
vi  Reading With My Eyes Open Social and Cultural Views of Language 37 Hymes’ Theory of Communicative Competence 37 Sapir-Whorf 38 Critical Language Awareness 39
0
0
211
Good Corporation, Bad Corporation: Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Economy
Good Corporation, Bad Corporation Appendix D Smallholders and Fair Trade In order to fully evaluate the socioeconomic impacts of fair trade coffee on small-scale
0
1
235
Signal Computing: Digital Signals in the Software Domain
In this textbook, we have chosen the following: √ j −1 t continuous time; units typically seconds xt a real-valued function of continuous time physical signal f
0
0
206
eMarketing: The Essential Guide to Marketing in a Digital World
Glossary › Video search engine optimisation VSEO Glossary › Search engine spiders Search engine spiders Search term Secondary research Segmentation Sender alias
0
5
305
Small Business Management in the 21st Century
Table 1.5 Reasons for Small Business Failure Managerial Inadequacy Financial Inadequacy External Factors Failure in planning initial start-up Cash-flow problems
0
0
873
Show more