• No results found

The Human Cytomegalovirus-Specific UL1 Gene Encodes a Late-Phase Glycoprotein Incorporated in the Virion Envelope


Academic year: 2019

Share "The Human Cytomegalovirus-Specific UL1 Gene Encodes a Late-Phase Glycoprotein Incorporated in the Virion Envelope"


Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text


Glycoprotein Incorporated in the Virion Envelope

Medya Shikhagaie,aEva Mercé-Maldonado,bElena Isern,cAura Muntasell,d

M. Mar Alba`,d,e,fMiguel López-Botet,a,dHartmut Hengel,b and Ana Anguloc

Immunology Unit, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spaina

; Institut für Virologie, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germanyb

; Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spainc

; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Research Institute), Barcelona, Spaind

; Research Programme in Biomedical Informatics, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spaine

; and Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona, Spainf

We have investigated the previously uncharacterized human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)UL1open reading frame (ORF), a mem-ber of the rapidly evolving HCMV RL11 family.UL1is HCMV specific; the absence ofUL1in chimpanzee cytomegalovirus (CCMV) and sequence analysis studies suggest thatUL1may have originated by the duplication of an ancestor gene from the

RL11-TRLcluster (TRL11,TRL12, andTRL13). Sequence similarity searches against human immunoglobulin (Ig)-containing proteins revealed that HCMV pUL1 shows significant similarity to the cellular carcinoembryonic antigen-related (CEA) protein family N-terminal Ig domain, which is responsible for CEA ligand recognition. Northern blot analysis revealed thatUL1is tran-scribed during the late phase of the viral replication cycle in both fibroblast-adapted and endotheliotropic strains of HCMV. We characterized the protein encoded by hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged UL1 in the AD169-derived HB5 background. UL1 is expressed as a 224-amino-acid type I transmembrane glycoprotein which becomes detectable at 48 h postinfection. In infected human fi-broblasts, pUL1 colocalized at the cytoplasmic site of virion assembly and secondary envelopment together with TGN-46, a marker for thetrans-Golgi network, and viral structural proteins, including the envelope glycoprotein gB and the tegument phosphoprotein pp28. Furthermore, analyses of highly purified AD169 UL1-HA epitope-tagged virions revealed that pUL1 is a novel constituent of the HCMV envelope. Importantly, the deletion ofUL1in HCMV TB40/E resulted in reduced growth in a cell type-specific manner, suggesting that pUL1 may be implicated in regulating HCMV cell tropism.


uman cytomegalovirus (CMV) (HCMV) belongs to the

Her-pesviridaefamily and has the largest genome of any

charac-terized human virus, comprised of around 200 predicted open reading frames (ORFs). The 230-kb linear, double-stranded DNA genome consists of long unique (UL) and short unique (US) se-quences, each flanked by the inverted repeats referred to as TRL/ IRLand IRS/TRS, resulting in the overall genomic configuration TRL-UL-IRL-IRS-US-TRS(35). In spite of the high levels of se-quence variability, the gene content is relatively well conserved across related herpesviruses, and all family members share a set of core genes involved in basic metabolic and structural functions (1). Genes that are specific to a given virus or group of viruses are typically nonessential for replication in cell culture and are fre-quently involved in immune evasion. Certain immunoevasive genes show significant similarity to genes found in host genomes, possibly dating from events of molecular piracy (27).

Sequence analyses of the HCMV genome showed that as many as 70 putative glycoprotein-encoding ORFs are found in clinical isolates (11) and that 57 are found in the AD169 strain (13). HCMV structural glycoproteins can be divided into two broad classes, those conserved between members of the family

Herpes-viridae(including gB, gH, gL, gM, and gN) and subgenus-specific

glycoproteins without homology to other herpesviruses, com-prised of, among others, gpTRL10 (51), gpRL13 (53), gpUL132 (52),UL74-encoded gO (29),UL4-encoded gp48 (12), US27 (24), and UL33 (34). Many of the HCMV-specific glycoproteins, in contrast to the conserved glycoproteins, are not essential forin

vitroreplication in fibroblasts and presumably participate in cell

and tissue tropism or pathogenicity (17).

The CMV-specific glycoproteins gpRL13 and gpUL4 are mem-bers of the primate CMVRL11gene family, located on the

extrem-ity of the CMV genome. ThisRL11gene family is comprised of 11 members conserved in both HCMV and chimpanzee CMV (CCMV) (RL11, RL12, RL13, UL4, UL5, UL6, UL7, UL8, UL9,

UL10, andUL11), and HCMV-specific genes (UL1, RL5A, and

RL6) presumably originated by gene duplication in the last 6 to 5 million years, which separates both CMV species (13, 14). The members of theRL11gene family were initially assembled due to the presence of a defined motif in their sequence resembling cel-lular Thy-1 within a region conserved between other immuno-globulin (Ig) superfamily (IgSF) members (13). Subsequently, in a more detailed analysis, this shared core motif was further exam-ined in the context of the neighboring sequences, allowing the characterization of an RL11 domain (RL11D) (14). The RL11D consists of a region of variable length (65 to 82 amino acids) con-taining three characteristic conserved residues (a tryptophan and two cysteines) and several potential N-linked glycosylation sites. Regarding the distribution and functions of the RL11 family members,UL4-encoded gp48 and gpRL13 have been described to be virion envelope glycoproteins (12, 53).UL10andRL13 are so-called temperance genes, with cell type-specific virus growth inhibition functions (17, 53).TRL11encodes an IgG-Fc binding glycoprotein (3, 33).UL11encodes a hypervariable protein

ex-Received14 September 2011Accepted31 January 2012

Published ahead of print15 February 2012

Address correspondence to Ana Angulo, aangulo@ub.edu.

Supplemental material for this article may be found athttp://jvi.asm.org/. Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.


on November 7, 2019 by guest



pressed on the cell surface of infected cells (26). UL7 is a glycopro-tein with structural homology to the signaling lymphocyte activa-tion molecule (SLAM) family receptor CD229, with the capacity to mediate adhesion to leukocytes and interfere with cytokine pro-duction (21). Of note,RL11genes, dispensable for virus growth in cell culture, are among the most variable HCMV genes (16, 36), andRL5A, RL13, andUL9 are members of a restricted set of HCMV hypervariable genes (16).

Although there is no information on the expression and func-tion of pUL1, sequence similarity was found with members of the human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family (27). The CEA family, a structural subgroup of the Ig superfamily, is composed of 29 members located on the human chromosome 19q13.2 (32). In general, these molecules possess a leader peptide, one N-terminal Ig variable (IgV)-like domain, and a variable number of two dif-ferent types of Ig constant (IgC)-like domains. Members of this family are broadly divided into the CEA-related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM) and the pregnancy-specific glycoprotein (PSG) subgroups, involved in immune responses and reproduc-tion. CEACAMs primarily mediate intracellular adhesion through homophilic and/or heterophilic interactions. Interestingly, mem-bers of the CEA family have been reported to function as receptors for bacterial or viral pathogens (7, 32).

In the present study, we have approached the molecular char-acterization of HCMV-specific UL1. To this end, an HCMV (AD169-derived HB5 background) recombinant with hemagglu-tinin (HA) epitope-taggedUL1and a mutant with a fullUL1 de-letion in the endotheliotropic HCMV TB40/E strain were gener-ated. Our data reveal that theUL1ORF is transcribed with late kinetics. pUL1 is glycosylated and localizes at the site of virus assembly and secondary envelopment in infected cells, forming part of the envelope of HCMV virions. An HCMV mutant with a targeted deletion ofUL1exhibits a growth defect phenotype in retinal pigment epithelium cells but not in fibroblasts, indicating that this ORF encodes a cell type-specific tropism factor.


Cell lines and viruses. The MRC-5 human fibroblast cell line (ATCC CCL-171, passages 5 to 15) and the U373-MG cell line derived from glioblastomas (ECACC 89081403) were grown in Dulbecco’s mod-ified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Spain) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (10␮g/ml). The telomerase-immortalized hu-man retina pigment epithelial (RPE) cell line (generously provided by Martin Messerle, University of Hannover, Germany) was grown in DMEM-Ham’s F-12 (1:1) medium (Gibco) supplemented with 5% (vol/ vol) FBS, penicillin (50 U/ml), streptomycin (50␮g/ml), 0.25% (vol/vol) sodium bicarbonate, and 2 mM glutamine. The following HCMV strains were used: Towne (ATCC VR-977), Toledo (41), endotheliotropic strain TB40/E (49), TB40/E reconstituted from the respective bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone TB40/E BAC4 (48), and AD169 reconstituted from the respective BAC clone pHB5 (6). Infectious viral stocks were propagated as follows: MRC-5 cells were infected at a low multiplicity of infection (MOI), and the supernatants of infected cells that exhibited 100% cytopathic effects were cleared of cellular debris by centrifugation at 6,000⫻ g for 10 min. The cell-free supernatant was centrifuged at 20,000⫻gfor 3 h to pellet the virus particles. The amount of infectious virus was determined by counting MRC-5 cells positive for the HCMV immediate-early (IE) protein IE1 using monoclonal antibody (MAb) B810R (Chemicon) against this protein. Briefly, MRC-5 cells were incu-bated for 2 h with graded volumes of virus-containing supernatants, the inoculums were washed away with a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)

rinse after the adsorption period, and the cells were incubated with DMEM supplemented with 3% FBS. After 20 h, cells were fixed for 20 min at room temperature (RT) with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Samples were blocked with PBS containing 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA), per-meabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100, and incubated with the IE1 MAb and Alexa 488-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse (Fab=)2fragments. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (4=-6=-diamidine-2-phenylindole; Sigma-Al-drich) for 5 min at room temperature. Slides were examined with a Leica DM6000B fluorescence microscope. Images were analyzed with Leica flu-orescence workstation software (Leica FW4000).

Construction and generation of TB40/EUL1 and AD169 UL1-HA viruses.HCMV BAC mutagenesis was carried out by homologous recom-bination between a linear DNA PCR fragment and endotheliotropic HCMV-TB40/E-derived BAC4 (TB40/E BAC4) or the laboratory-adapted AD169 BAC (pHB5) inEscherichia coli. Mutagenesis was per-formed as previously described by Wagner et al. (58). TB40/E BAC4 (48) was used for the generation ofUL1deletion viruses, removing the com-pleteUL1gene, and pHB5 was used to generate recombinant AD169 with theUL1HA epitope-tagged virus. To delete theUL1sequence in TB40/E BAC4 and generate TB40/E BAC4⌬UL1, the following oligonucleotides were used: 5=-GTG GTT TTT ATA GGT TAA CCA CTT ATG GTG TAA AGT AGG ATA TTC ATA GTT ATT GAA AAC CGG CCA GTG AAT


GCA CAA ATT TAT CCT GAA TAA ACT AGC GTC GAT ACT TTG TAA GAC CAT GAT TAC GCC AAG CTC CC-3=. For the construction of theUL1HA-tagged virus in pHB5, a forward primer containing the HA tag epitope sequence followed by a stop codon (5=-CGT TCC GGC AAC TCT GAG ACA CAA ACT ACG AAC TAG AAA CAA CGT AAA TCG CAT AGC GGC CTA CCC ATA CGA TGT TCC AGA TTA CGC TTA ACC AGT GAA TTC GAG CTC GGT AC-3=) and a reverse primer con-taining the homology region downstream ofUL1 (without the stop


GAT AAA TTA GTG TCG ATA CTT TGT AAG ACC ATG ATT ACG CCA AGC TCC-3=) were used. PCR fragments using plasmid pSLFRTKn as a template containing a kanamycin resistance (Kanr) gene (flanked by minimal FLP recombination target [FRT] sites) were inserted into TB40/E BAC4 or pHB5 by homologous recombination inE. coli(58). The TB40/E BAC4⌬UL1 and pHB5 UL1-HA mutants were digested with XbaI, and the pattern of the restriction enzyme was compared to that of wild-type TB40/E BAC4 or wild-type pHB5. The presence of the Kanrgene was further confirmed by probing after Southern blotting with a kanamycin cassette-specific probe. The Kanrgene was excised from both viruses by FLP-mediated recombination (58), and correct mutagenesis was verified by restriction pattern analysis followed by Southern blotting and PCR analysis. Recombinant HCMV was reconstituted from HCMV BAC mu-tants by the Superfect transfection method as described previously (6). Sequencing to confirm that the appropriate mutagenesis process took place and that TB40/E⌬UL1 and the parental virus had not acquired additional mutations in theUL128gene locus was performed with DNA extracted from infected cells after the reconstitution of the viruses.

Purification of HCMV particles and analysis of virion protease sen-sitivity.HCMV particles were further purified by negative-positive glyc-erol-tartrate gradient centrifugation as previously described (54). The iso-lated tartrate gradient-purified AD169 virions were treated with proteinase K. Protease digestion was performed with 10␮g of proteinase K (Roche) per ml for 20 min at 37°C. Some virion samples were solubi-lized with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), added to a final concentration of 0.5% (wt/vol). Virion preparations were subjected to SDS-PAGE and im-munoblot analysis.

UL1RNA analysis.For Northern blot analysis, whole-cell RNA was isolated from mock-infected or infected MRC-5 cells at 8, 24, 48, and 72 h postinfection (p.i.) using QIAshredder columns and an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). For gel electrophoresis, 10␮g of each sample was used, and the preparations were separated on 1% agarose gels con-taining 2% formaldehyde. Northern blot analysis was carried out

on November 7, 2019 by guest



ing to standard procedures. Hybridization and detection were performed by using the digoxigenin (DIG) system (Roche) according to the manu-facturer’s instructions. Briefly,UL1-specific DNA hybridization probes were labeled with digoxigenin-dUTPs using a DIG DNA labeling kit (Roche). Probes were prepared by PCR withUL1-specific primers (5= -GCG AAC TTT GTG GAT GGA ACG G-3=and 5=-ACG TTA TTT CTA GTT CGT AGT-3=), using pHB5 as a template. Late-phase gene expres-sion was inhibited by the use of phosphonoacetic acid (PAA; Sigma-Al-drich). A total of 250␮g/m1 of PAA was added to the medium at the time of infection and maintained throughout infection.

Antibodies.Commercial MAbs specific for IE1 (B810R; Chemicon) and pp28 (ab6502; Abcam) were employed. gB-specific MAb 27-78 and MAb 58-15 (generously provided by William J. Britt, University of Ala-bama, Birmingham) were used for immunofluorescence microscopy and immunoblotting, respectively. Reagents specific for calnexin (catalog number 610524; BD Bioscience), GM-130 (catalog number 558712; BD Bioscience), TGN-46 (catalog number AHP500G; AbDseroTec), and ER-GIC-53 (catalog number E6782; Sigma-Aldrich) were generously pro-vided by Julia V. Blume (Center for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain). Rabbit HA (catalog number H6908; Sigma-Aldrich) anti-body was used to detect UL1-HA. Secondary antibodies used for immunofluorescence microscopy were Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-mouse IgG(H⫹L) (catalog number A21422; Invitrogen) and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG(H⫹L) (catalog number A11008; Invitrogen). Anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase-labeled antibodies (Amersham Bioscience) were used for immunoblotting.

Immunofluorescence microscopy.MRC-5 cells grown to 90% con-fluence in 13-mm-diameter coverslips were mock infected or infected with AD169 UL1-HA for 72 h. Coverslips were rinsed with PBS, and cells were then fixed for 20 min at RT in 4% paraformaldehyde freshly pre-pared in PBS. Cells were blocked with PBS containing 2% BSA for 20 min at RT and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min. Cov-erslips were incubated for 1 h at RT with a primary antibody diluted in PBS containing 2% BSA, followed by 45 min of incubation with a fluoro-chrome-conjugated secondary antibody in PBS containing 2% BSA. Cov-erslips were mounted in Mowiol solution and analyzed under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Confocal SP2; Leica) at a magnification of ⫻40.

SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.Virus-infected cell proteins were obtained from AD169 UL1-HA-infected MRC-5 cells grown in 6-well tissue culture dishes. Cell lysates of mock-infected MRC-5 cells were used as controls. Cells were lysed under reducing conditions and heated to 100°C. Proteins were separated by gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gel elec-trophoresis (10 to 15% SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes that were blocked with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 3% BSA (or 5% milk powder). Antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20. For the detection of primary antibody binding, horse-radish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG fol-lowed by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (West Pico Supersignal kit; Pierce, Rockford, IL) was used according to the manufacturer’s in-structions. The removal of N-linked oligosaccharides from cell lysates was carried out by usingN-glycosidase F (PNGase F; Roche), according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Briefly, the samples were denatured in gly-coprotein-denaturing buffer at 100°C for 10 min and cooled to 4°C for 5 min. The samples were then digested for 4 h at 37°C with PNGase F before being analyzed by immunoblotting.

Viral growth kinetics.MRC-5, RPE, and U373-MG cells seeded into 24-well plates were infected with TB40/E or TB40/E⌬UL1 at different MOIs (0.025 for MRC-5 cells, 0.1 and 5 for RPE cells, and 0.3 for U373-MG cells). After a 2-h adsorption period, the inoculums were re-moved, and infected monolayers were rinsed with PBS and incubated with DMEM supplemented with 3% FBS. At various times postinfection, the supernatants of the infected cells were harvested, cleared of cellular debris, and frozen at⫺70°C. In the case of U373-MG cells, the cell-associated viral progeny was measured. The quantification of infectious virus was

determined by a fluorescence focus unit (FFU) assay, counting HCMV IE1-positive cells as indicated above. The number of infected cells (fluo-rescence focus) was determined by microscopy.

Sequence analysis and evolutionary studies.Primate CMV genes and proteins were retrieved from the NCBI database (40), and human proteins were retrieved from the Ensembl Human database (28). NCBI accession numbers for the HCMV AD169 strain (13, 15) and chimpanzee cytomeg-alovirus (CCMV) are NC001347 and NC003521.1, respectively. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) corresponding to members of the Ig domain-containing family, including the V-set (variable), C1-set (constant-1), C2-set (constant-2), and I-set (intermediate) subsets, were downloaded from PFAM (23). A total of 1,314 Ig domain-containing human and HCMV proteins were obtained by using the program HMMsearch (19) with an E value cutoff of 10⫺3. The BLASTP program was used to search for putative human homologues of RL11 proteins using an E value cutoff of 0.1 (2). Sequence alignments of homologous Ig domain-containing HCMV proteins and cellular proteins were generated with the help of the CLUSTALW program (56). The number of amino acid substitutions per site (K) was calculated for orthologous pairs of HCMV and CCMV pro-teins by using the PHYLIP program Protdist with default parameters (22). N-glycosylation sites, signal sequences, and transmembrane domains were predicted by using NetNGlyc 1.0 (25), SignalP 3.0 (37), and TMHMM 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/), respectively.


Structure of pUL1.TheUL1gene is predicted to encode a 224-amino-acid type I transmembrane glycoprotein, comprising a sig-nal peptide (amino acids 1 to 26), an Ig-like domain (amino acids 45 to 152) with 8 potential N-linked glycosylation sites, a trans-membrane region (amino acids 184 to 206), and a short cytoplas-mic tail (amino acids 207 to 224) without apparent signaling motifs (Fig. 1A). Since sequence similarity of pUL1 to pregnancy-specific glycoprotein 5 and other members of the human CEA family (27) was previously noted, we sought to explore this finding in more detail. We performed BLASTP searches of allRL11gene family members against all human Ig-containing proteins. A sig-nificant sequence similarity (E value of⬍10⫺3) was found be-tween the Ig-like domain in pUL1 and the N-terminal IgV-like domain in the CEA family members (shown for CEACAM-1, -3, -5, and -6 in Fig. 1B). As an example, the pUL1 Ig-like domain exhibits 61% amino acid similarity and 28% amino acid identity with the human N-terminal CEACAM-1 IgV domain (E value of 0.0004) (Fig. 1B). For the rest of the HCMVRL11members, sig-nificant similarity to CEA proteins was not detected. The align-ment of the pUL1 Ig-like domain and the three-dimensional crystal structure of the soluble ectodomain of the murine CEACAM-1a isoform (55) indicated that the formation of Ig-like ␤-sheets is conserved and that the conserved residues are mostly buried in the hydrophobic core, maintaining the Ig fold. CEACAM positions that appear to be critical for the formation of the typical␤-sheets in IgV-like domains are present in pUL1 (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, multiple alignments of the Ig-like domain of pUL1 and the N-terminal IgV domain of several CEA proteins showed that a number of well-conserved residues in members of the CEA family are also present in pUL1, whereas they are absent from other RL11 proteins (Fig. 1B and data not shown).

Origin and evolution of pUL1.The pULl sequence is found exclusively in HCMV genomes but lacks a counterpart in other CMV lineages and betaherpesviruses; therefore, the origin and evolution of theUL1gene was investigated. TheRL11gene family is a rapidly evolving and highly variable virus gene family, both in terms of gene members and in terms of sequence divergence

on November 7, 2019 by guest



across related viruses or strains (16). To better understand the origin and evolution of theRL11family, we determined the num-ber of amino acid substitutions per site (K) between RL11 HCMV-CCMV orthologous proteins and between pULl and RL11 HCMV paralogous proteins (Table 1). The estimated number of amino acid substitutions per site (K) between RL11 HCMV-CCMV or-thologous proteins is, on average, 1.5, about 15 times higher than the average amino acid substitution rate of a prototypical well-conserved herpesvirus gene (i.e., theUL54gene, encoding DNA polymerase). Among paralogs, the lowest K values are for the alignments of pULl with pTRL11, pTRL12 and pTRL13 (1.9 in the three cases). This, together with the fact that theUL1gene is lo-cated just next to theTRL13gene, suggests that pUL1 may have originated by duplication from an ancestor gene from the TRL cluster.

UL1 is transcribed with late gene kinetics.In the HCMV AD169 genome, UL1extends from nucleotide 11835 to 12509 (675 bp). To analyze potential transcripts arising from theUL1

ORF, total RNA was isolated from MRC-5 cells at different times after infection with HCMV AD169 and subjected to Northern blot analysis using aUL1-specific probe. As shown in Fig. 2A, largeUL1

transcripts, of approximately 5.8 kb and 3.8 kb, could be detected no earlier than 48 to 72 h p.i. (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, a similar

pattern of large transcripts was also observed previously for other

UL1-related genes, such asTRL10(51) andTRL/IRL13(61). HCMV lytic gene expression is conventionally divided into three major kinetic classes of viral genes, immediate-early, early,


FIG 1pUL1 shares key conserved residues with CEA proteins. (A) Structural predictions for HCMV pUL1. A schematic drawing of the 224-amino-acid UL1 protein is shown, with the signal peptide (SignalP) (amino acids 1 to 26), the Ig-like domain (amino acids 45 to 152), and the transmembrane region (TM) (amino acids 184 to 206) indicated. (B) Multiple-sequence alignment showing the sequence similarity between the HCMV UL1 protein Ig-like domain (amino acids 45 to 152) and the N-terminal IgV domains of four representative members of the CEA family, human CEACAM-1, -3, -5, and -6. Boldface type indicates highly conserved residues in theRL11family, and the potential N-glycosylated residue in theRL11family is underlined (14). Highly conserved residues in CEACAM-1 and other IgSF members that appear to be critical for the formation of the␤-sheets in IgV-like domains are boxed (30). The arrows above the sequence alignment indicate the␤-sheet structure of CEACAM-1a as determined by a previous crystal structure analysis (56). An asterisk indicates identical amino acids, a colon indicates conserved amino acids, and a period indicates less conserved amino acids. (C) Alignment of the pUL1 RL11D and the three-dimensional crystal structure of murine CEACAM-1a. Conserved residues are indicated on the␤-sheets, boldface type indicates conserved buried residues, and italic type indicates conserved surface residues.

TABLE 1Amino acid substitutions per site in viral protein pairwise comparisonsa

Orthologue of HCMV-CCMV

K(no. of aa substitutions/site)

Paralogue of UL1-HCMV RL11

K(no. of aa substitutions/site)

RL5a 3.5

RL6 3.3

TRL11 0.7 TRL11 1.9

TRL12 1.6 TRL12 1.9

TRL13 1.2 TRL13 1.9

UL4 2.5 UL4 2.8

UL6 1.2 UL6 3.1

UL7 1.3 UL7 2.3

UL9 2.0 UL9 2.6

UL10 2.3 UL10 2.0

UL11 1.0 UL11 2.7

UL54 0.1

aaa, amino acid.

on November 7, 2019 by guest



and late. The transcription ofUL1RNA in AD169-infected cells was completely blocked by the viral DNA polymerase inhibitor phosphonoacetic acid (PAA), consistent with the classification of

UL1as a true late-phase gene, as previously described and repro-duced here forUL99(Fig. 2B) (31). The presence ofUL1 tran-scripts in MRC-5 cells infected with a panel of HCMV strains, including laboratory strains AD169 and Toledo and endothelio-tropic strain TB40/E, was studied. The Towne strain, previously reported to beUL1defective due to a deletion in this ORF (47), was used as a negative control. Total RNAs from cells infected with HCMV TB40/E, AD169, Toledo, and Towne were isolated at 72 h p.i. and analyzed by Northern blotting using aUL1 (AD169)-specific probe. As shown in Fig. 2C, the two predominant 5.8-kb and 3.8-kb UL1 transcripts were detected in cells infected by HCMV TB40/E, AD169, and Toledo (Fig. 2C). The signal inten-sities of these two RNA species were relatively lower in Toledo-infected cells, and as expected,UL1transcripts were undetectable upon infection with Towne.

Expression of the UL1 glycoprotein during HCMV replica-tion.The 224-amino-acid-long UL1 polypeptide (molecular mass of 25.5 kDa) is predicted to be expressed as a type I glycoprotein with a signal peptide and a membrane anchor. We investigated the expression kinetics of the protein product ofUL1during produc-tive HCMV infection. For this purpose, we generated an HCMV (AD169-derived HB5 background) recombinant virus with an

HA tag fused to theUL1C-terminal end. Reconstituted AD169 UL1-HA was used to infect MRC-5 cells, and the kinetics of pUL1 expression were monitored by immunoblot analysis using an an-ti-HA antibody in cell extracts harvested at different time points ranging from 4 to 72 h p.i. HCMV-specific MAbs that are reactive with the major immediate protein IE1 pp72 (UL123) and the pp28 (UL99) late phosphoprotein were used as controls. As shown in Fig. 3A, the anti-HA antibody showed two protein species, a fast-er-migrating nonspecific band, which was present in both HCMV-infected and mock-infected MRC-5 cells, and a band of

⬃55 kDa, which was weakly detectable at 48 h p.i. but was abun-dantly found at 72 h p.i, coincident with the expression kinetics of pp28 (31). This 55-kDa HA-tagged UL1 band was absent in im-munoblots of wild-type AD169-infected cells (data not shown), further confirming its specific detection. At time points after in-fection when signals for pUL1 were not observed, IE1 pp72 was present, as expected, already being expressed after 4 h p.i. and remaining for the duration of the HCMV replication cycle. Con-sistent with the observed kinetic pattern and the results obtained at the transcriptional level, a metabolic blockade with PAA re-sulted in the disappearance of the 55-kDa band (Fig. 3B), indicat-ing that the UL1 protein is expressed late durindicat-ing HCMV replica-tion.

Many of the HCMV structural glycoproteins form high-mo-lecular-weight disulfide-linked oligomers, such as the gCI

com-FIG 2Kinetics ofUL1gene expression. (A) Whole-cell RNA was isolated from uninfected (mock) MRC-5 cells or cells infected at an MOI of 2 with HCMV AD169 at the indicated hours postinfection. Equivalent amounts of RNA were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis and subsequently analyzed by Northern blotting using an HCMVUL1-specific probe. (B)UL1transcription is inhibited by PAA. Whole-cell RNA was isolated from HCMV AD169-infected cells at 72 h p.i., incubated with or without PAA, and processed as described above for panel A. In addition to theUL1-specific probe, RNA was hybridized with a probe specific for the late HCMV geneUL99. (C)UL1transcripts in MRC-5 cells infected with different HCMV strains (AD169, TB40/E, Toledo, and Towne) for 72 h were analyzed as described above for panel A. The bottom panels show ethidium bromide staining of 28S rRNA (4.8-kb) and 18S rRNA (1.8-kb) species.

FIG 3Expression of the UL1 glycoprotein in HCMV-infected fibroblasts. (A) Uninfected (mock) and AD169-infected MRC-5 cells at an MOI of 5 were harvested at the indicated times p.i. Equivalent amounts of cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies reactive with HA or the HCMV IE1 and pp28 proteins.␤-Actin detection was used as a protein loading control. (B) Experiments were performed as described above for panel A to assess the effect of PAA treatment (⫹PAA) on late-phase protein expression. (C) Whole-cell lysates of AD169 UL1-HA-infected MRC-5 cells (72 h p.i.) were left untreated or digested with PNGase F. The preparations were subjected to immunoblot analysis using an anti-HA antibody.

on November 7, 2019 by guest


[image:5.585.99.491.64.188.2] [image:5.585.89.504.563.674.2]

plex, composed of multidimers of gB (9, 39); therefore, we ana-lyzed UL1 protein migration patterns under both nonreducing and reducing (with ␤-mercaptoethanol) conditions. The UL1 protein was␤-mercaptoethanol resistant, implying that it is not part of a disulfide-linked oligomer in infected MRC-5 cells (data not shown). The high number of putative N-linked glycan sites (n⫽9) present in pUL1 and the difference between the apparent molecular mass (55 kDa) observed for this protein by immuno-blotting and the calculated molecular mass (25.5 kDa) of the 224-amino-acid polypeptide backbone suggested that pUL1 under-goes an extensive posttranslational glycosylation process. Indeed, digestion with PNGase F, which removes complex and high-man-nose N-linked sugars, enhanced the migration of the specific band from 55 kDa to 25 kDa (Fig. 3C). These results confirmed that pUL1 is expressed as a glycoprotein.

Subcellular localization of pUL1 in HCMV-infected cells.To analyze the localization of pUL1 in HCMV-infected cells, the HA epitope of the AD169 UL1-HA virus was employed to trace its subcellular distribution by confocal microscopy in comparison with a panel of molecular markers of the exocytic and endocytic pathways. In MRC-5 cells following fixation at 72 h p.i., pUL1-HA accumulated in a large cytoplasmic compartment (Fig. 4). This compartment was not detectable in uninfected and wild-type AD169-infected MRC-5 cells, thus confirming the specificity of the observed staining pattern (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). pUL1-containing structures failed to colocalize with several intracellular markers, including the endoplasmic reticu-lum (ER) marker calnexin (Fig. 4A) and ERGIC-53 (Fig. 4B), an integral protein localized in the ER-Golgi-intermediate compart-ment (ERGIC). The staining of GM-130, acis-Golgi marker, ap-peared in a dotted ring forming structures in the proximity of pUL1 but did not exhibit a superimposing pattern indicative of colocalizing proteins (Fig. 4C). As observed previously by other investigators, alterations in the morphologies of the Golgi com-partment and the ERGIC were seen during HCMV infection (45). During its final envelopment, HCMV acquires membranes con-taining endosomal andtrans-Golgi network markers, while lyso-somes and cis-and medial-Golgi markers are not present and surround the virus envelopment and assembly site (10). Markers for the endocytic pathway, such as the early endosomal marker EEA-1, and recycling endosomes (transferrin receptor) did not colocalize with pUL1 (data not shown). Furthermore, pUL1 colo-calization with the lysosomal protein LAMP-1 was also ruled out (data not shown). However, a partial colocalization of pUL1-con-taining structures and thetrans-Golgi marker TGN-46 (Fig. 4D) was observed.

During late stages of the infectious cycle, pUL1 did not colo-calize with markers of the cis- or medial-Golgi compartment (ERGIC-53 and GM-130). To further confirm these results, in-fected cells were incubated with brefeldin A (BFA), and the distri-butions of UL1-HA-, GM-130-, and ERGIC-53-positive mem-branes were compared. BFA interferes with exocytic cellular transport, and the treatment resulted in the vesiculation of the ring-structured GM-130- and ERGIC-53-positive membranes, whereas such changes were not observed for the pUL1-HA-con-taining structure (data not shown). The envelopment of the infec-tious HCMV particles was proposed previously to take place within a juxtanuclear cytoplasmic site (44, 45), resembling the pUL1 distribution pattern. Altogether, these results suggest that pUL1 in infected cells, associated with thetrans-Golgi apparatus,

accumulates mainly in a juxtanuclear site argued to constitute a virus assembly compartment.

Colocalization of pUL1 with tegument and envelope HCMV proteins. Based on the cytoplasmic compartmentalization of pUL1, we explored whether other structural HCMV proteins gathered at the pUL1-containing site. To this end, antibodies re-active with the tegument phosphoprotein pp28 and the major virion envelope glycoprotein gB (UL55) were employed. HCMV pp28 was reported previously to colocalize with other tegument and viral envelope proteins at the virus assembly site during the late phase of the infectious cycle (45, 46), and it is also acquired by the virion in the cytoplasm. Interestingly, pUL1 colocalized with pp28 (Fig. 5A) and gB (Fig. 5B), consistent with its presence at the site of viral assembly and final envelopment, thus suggesting that it might be integrated into the HCMV virion.

pUL1 is a component of the HCMV virion. To explore

whether pUL1 is a virion structural glycoprotein, we purified AD169 UL1-HA particles by negative-viscosity–positive-glycerol-tartrate gradient centrifugation and analyzed them by immuno-blotting with the anti-HA antibody. This purification process facilitates the isolation of intact virions, separated from non-infectious enveloped particles (NIEPs) and dense bodies (DBs), and the removal of contaminating host cell debris. Purified wild-type AD169 virions were used as a negative control due to the absence of the HA epitope. In these experiments, the 55-kDa HA-tagged UL1-specific band observed in lysates of AD169 UL1-HA-infected cells was used as a positive control, the detection of which was reproduced both in lysates and in AD169 UL1-HA virions, in parallel with the pp28 structural protein but not IE1 pp72, a non-structural protein present only in preparations of infected cells (Fig. 6A, lanes 1 and 3). As expected, the 55-kDa HA-tagged UL1 band was not detected in wild-type AD169 virions, while the teg-ument phosphoprotein was (Fig. 6A, lane 4). In order to define the virion incorporation of pUL1, additional experiments were per-formed. Previous studies have shown that extracellular virion en-velope glycoproteins are sensitive to protease digestion, while cap-sid and tegument proteins are protected (4, 60). Thus, we analyzed the sensitivity of virion pUL1 to protease digestion. AD169 UL1-HA virions were treated with detergent (SDS) to disrupt the envelope and then digested with proteinase K (Fig. 6B). When samples were untreated, the tegument protein pp28 and the enve-lope glycoprotein gB were detectable (Fig. 6B, lane 1). Upon pro-teinase K digestion and in the absence of detergent, pp28 re-mained intact, whereas pUL1 was no longer detected, and the highly abundant gB (oligomeric form) was largely digested (Fig. 6B, lane 2). In samples treated with SDS only, both tegument and envelope proteins remained intact (Fig. 6B, lane 3). In contrast, when initially solubilized and then digested with proteinase K, pUL1, gB, and pp28 were no longer detected (Fig. 6B, lane 4). Altogether, these findings provided evidence that pUL1, in a man-ner similar to that of gB, is sensitive to protease treatment and likely exposed on the HCMV envelope.

Deletion ofUL1results in HCMV growth defects in epithelial cells.A number of the HCMV envelope glycoproteins have been shown to play a role in critical steps of the viral life cycle, i.e., in processes such as cell entry, assembly, and envelopment of virions or cell-to-cell spread. To assess the impact that the pUL1 envelope glycoprotein may have on the HCMV replication cycle, we con-structed an HCMV mutant lacking theUL1ORF using the TB40/ E-derived BAC (48). Unlike the fibroblast-adapted AD169 strain,

on November 7, 2019 by guest



TB40 virions exhibit an intact tropism for endothelial as well as epithelial cells, the entry of which is mediated by the pentameric gH/gL/UL128/UL130/UL131 envelope complex, which is defi-cient in AD169 (43). The completeUL1sequence was removed from the genome of endotheliotropic strain TB40/E, generating the recombinant virus TB40/E⌬UL1. We then infected human MRC-5 cells, retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells, and U373-MG cells, derived from glioblastomas, at a low MOI with TB40/E

⌬UL1 or parental strain TB40/E. An MOI of 0.025 was used to infect the fully permissive fibroblasts, while RPE and U373-MG

cells (which support HCMV replication to a lesser extent) were infected at MOIs of 0.1 and 0.3, respectively. The production of extracellular (MRC-5 and RPE cells) or cell-associated (U373-MG cells) virus was analyzed over the course of the replicative cycle. As shown in Fig. 7B, in RPE cells, the growth levels of the UL1-defi-cient virus were significantly reduced (up to 100-fold) in compar-ison to those obtained with the parental virus (P⬍0.05 at the different time points). Consistent with this finding, TB40/E⌬UL1 produced smaller plaques than those obtained after TB40/E infec-tion of this cell type (data not shown). In contrast, under these

FIG 4Subcellular localization of pUL1-HA in a cytoplasmic compartment. MRC-5 cells grown on glass coverslips were infected with AD169 UL1-HA at an MOI of 5 and fixed at 72 h p.i. Uninfected MRC-5 cells were processed similarly (mock) (left panel of each row). The various cellular compartments in the secretory system were stained with the following antibodies: calnexin for the ER (A), ERGIC-53 for the ERGIC (B), GM-130 for the Golgi apparatus (C), and TGN-46 for thetrans-Golgi network (D). The cellular markers were detected with Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse IgG, and pUL1-HA was detected with Alexa 555 goat anti-rabbit IgG. Colocalization is indicated by a yellow signal in the merge channel.

on November 7, 2019 by guest



conditions of multistep growth, infections of MRC-5 and U373-MG cells demonstrated that TB40/E⌬UL1 and parental strain TB40/E grew with comparable kinetics (Fig. 7A and D). To examine whether the inefficient growth displayed by TB40/E

⌬UL1 in RPE cells could also be observed when high viral doses are used, RPE cells were infected with TB40/E⌬UL1 or parental strain TB40/E at an MOI of 5. As shown in Fig. 7C, under these high-MOI conditions, the TB40/E⌬UL1 growth defect, although apparent, was substantially diminished (see the differences of be-tween 2- and 3-fold obtained during TB40/E and TB40/E⌬UL1 infections at high MOIs versus the 1- to 2-log differences displayed at low MOIs). These results indicate that pUL1 is required for efficient HCMV growth in a cell type-specific manner.


Growing numbers of viral glycoproteins have been reported to be components of the HCMV envelope, including molecules con-served between members of theHerpesviridaefamily (gB, gH, gL, gM, and gN) and others that are HCMV specific (57) (e.g., gO [29], gpTRL10 [51], gpRL13 [53], UL4/gp48 [12], gpUL128 [59], gpUL130 [38], gpUL132 [52], US27 [24], and UL33 [34]). It is believed that genus-specific envelope glycoproteins contribute to the broad cell/tissue tropism of HCMV and its pathogenicity. In this study, we have characterized the HCMVUL1-encoded glyco-protein, transcribed in fibroblast-adapted strains AD169 and Toledo as well as in the endotheliotropic strain TB40/E. pUL1 is a PNGase F-sensitive glycoprotein, with a putative C-terminal transmembrane anchor domain, which is synthesized late during productive HCMV infection. In infected human fibroblasts, pUL1 is targeted to a cytoplasmic site together with several HCMV teg-ument and envelope proteins, consistent with its final destination at the previously described distinct compartment of virion assem-bly and final envelopment (reviewed in reference 8). Conse-quently, pUL1 can be incorporated into purified AD169 virions

FIG 6pUL1 is a structural glycoprotein that forms part of the HCMV enve-lope. (A) Analysis of pUL1 in cell lysates of AD169 UL1-HA-infected MRC-5 cells for 72 h (lane 1) and AD169 UL1-HA virions (lane 3). Mock-infected cells (lane 2) and wild-type AD169 virions (lane 4) were used as negative controls. Western blots were developed by using HA, pp28, or IE1 anti-bodies. (B) AD169 UL1-HA virions were treated with SDS (lanes 3 and 4) or left untreated (lanes 1 and 2). One-half of each virus preparation was subse-quently digested with proteinase K (lanes 2 and 4) or left undigested (lanes 1 and 3). The preparations were subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-HA, anti-pp28, or anti-gB antibodies.

FIG 5Colocalization with tegument and envelope HCMV proteins. MRC-5 cells grown on glass coverslips were infected with AD169 UL1-HA at an MOI of 5 and fixed at 72 h p.i. Following fixation, samples were incubated with MAbs specific for the tegument protein pp28 and HA (A) or the envelope glycoprotein gB and HA (B). pp28 and gB were further detected with Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse IgG, and UL1-HA was further detected with Alexa 555 goat anti-rabbit IgG. Colocalization is indicated by a yellow signal in the merge channel.

on November 7, 2019 by guest


[image:8.585.134.449.64.294.2] [image:8.585.59.266.369.630.2]

and becomes exposed in the HCMV envelope. Based on these results, we propose that pUL1 constitutes a novel HCMV struc-tural envelope glycoprotein.

UL1belongs to the highly variable and rapidly evolvingRL11

gene family. The fact thatUL1is an HCMV-specific gene lacking a counterpart in other CMV lineages and betaherpesviruses prompted us to surmise thatUL1may have arisen from a gene duplication event, which likely occurred after the speciation of human and chimpanzee. Of note, two other HCMVRL11family members,RL6andRL5A, are not found in chimpanzee CMV or in the more distantly related rhesus macaque CMV and are thus likely to have been formed within theRL11cluster as well in the last 5 to 6 million years. Based on evolutionary estimates of the

RL11family in primate CMVs, we propose thatUL1may have originated from a gene from the RL11-TRL cluster (TRL11,

TRL12, orTRL13) and subsequently diverged at a high rate. This is

supported by theKvalues found betweenUL1and its closest ho-mologues (other genes in theTRLcluster), which are higher than those typically observed between orthologous HCMV and CCMV genes. Indeed, a substantial heterogeneity of pUL1 among differ-ent HCMV strains has been appreciated (16, 47). Phylogenetic analyses ofUL1in a variety of clinical HCMV isolates allowed the differentiation of three distinct genotypes, with the existence of a considerable number (4/31; 12.9%) of isolates containing im-paired versions of theUL1sequence due to internal stop codon

mutations (47). In addition, the fibroblast-adapted Towne strain, which has lost virulence and experienced substantial genome al-terations during extensivein vitropassaging (41), bears a deletion inUL1(47). The hypothesis that theUL1polymorphisms existing in clinical isolates may have an effect on HCMV tissue tropism and pathogenesis remains to be substantiated in the future.

Both the transcriptional analysis ofUL1and the time course of pUL1 synthesis in HCMV-infected MRC-5 cells proved exclusive expression in the late phase of the replication cycle. The absence of

UL1transcription and translation after treatment with the potent viral DNA polymerase inhibitor PAA corroborated thatUL1 be-longs to the late class of CMV genes. In infected MRC-5 cells, pUL1 does not seem to be organized in higher-order disulfide-linked complexes. We show that gpUL1 acquires a molecular mass of 55 kDa. The glycoprotein is sensitive to PNGase F, producing a 25-kDa polypeptide. Based on these results, one could conclude that most if not all of the 9 potential N-glycosylation sites that pUL1 bears are modified by N-linked carbohydrates, with eight of them residing in the Ig-like domain and the remaining one resid-ing in the 32-amino-acid stretch that connects the Ig-like domain to the transmembrane sequence. It must also be noted that in this pUL1 region expanding from amino acids 153 to 183, several po-tential O-glycosylation sites are present. After entering the secre-tory pathway, the UL1 glycoprotein exits the ER to accumulate in close vicinity to other components of the HCMV particle, such as

FIG 7Growth kinetics of TB40/E⌬UL1 in different cell types. MRC-5 (A), RPE (B and C), and U373-MG (D) cells were infected with TB40/E or TB40/E⌬UL1 at MOIs of 0.025 (A), 0.1 (B), 5 (C), and 0.3 (D). On the designated days p.i., cultures were collected, and yields of extracellular (MRC-5 and RPE cells) or cell-associated (U373-MG cells) infectious virus present were determined by FFU assays. Each data point represents the average and standard deviation of data from three separate cultures. The dashed line indicates the limit of detection. The data are representative of three independent experiments.

on November 7, 2019 by guest



the tegument protein pp28 and the envelope glycoprotein gB, at the juxtanuclear cytoplasmic site of virion assembly. The HCMV envelope is still incompletely defined (8). Based on previous mass spectrometric studies (57), at least 19 structural glycoproteins of AD169 virions could be identified. It is interesting to note that pUL1, among several other bona fide virion glycoproteins (51, 53), was not resolved by this approach. We find that after tartrate gradient viral particle purification, pUL1 can be detected as a vi-rion constituent. Moreover, biochemical analyses of purified viri-ons revealed the same features of pUL1 as those demviri-onstrated for gB, allowing the assignment of pUL1 to the virion envelope.

pUL1 shares a striking similarity to the N-terminal IgV domain of cellular CEA family molecules that are involved in cellular ad-hesion by homotypic and heterotypic interactions with each other. The CEACAM subfamily includes inhibitory and activating receptors widely expressed in different cell types and tissues, and members of this family have been reported to be critical modula-tors of several physiological processes (32). Multiple alignments showed that a number of well-conserved residues found in several members of the CEA family are also present in pUL1. CEACAM positions that appear to be critical for the formation of the typical ␤-sheets in Ig-like domains are conserved as well. This sequence similarity raises the possibility that pUL1 acts as a decoy receptor mimicking host CEA proteins. Molecular mimicry is a strategy frequently employed by viruses to exploit or subvert host protein functions (20). As other members of theRL11family, despite con-taining RL11-characteristic features and conserved residues of the IgSF in their Ig-like domains, do not exhibit a significant degree of similarity to CEA proteins (E values below cutoff levels of 0.1 in our BLASTP searches), we hypothesize that pUL1 may have evolved to mimic members of the CEA family by sequence con-vergence, gaining CEA-like features along the million years of vi-rus-host coevolution. The molecular targets and the biological significance of the sequence similarity between pUL1 and mem-bers of the CEA family remain to be explored. Notably, a number of pathogens take advantage of the CEA extracellular domains to bind and infect their target cells; e.g., mouse CEACAM-1a is tar-geted by mouse hepatitis virus (18). Moreover, neisserial patho-gens have been shown to use CEACAM-1 in bronchial epithelial cells to suppress Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR-2) signaling (50). TLR-2 has been described to sense HCMV entry through a phys-ical interaction with gB and gH, which results in the activation of NF-␬B and cellular inflammatory cytokine secretion (5). Thus, pUL1 might contribute to HCMV access to host cells by interact-ing with members of the CEA family.

UL1is dispensable for HCMV growth in cell culture (42). Our results indicate, however, that pUL1 might be of significant rele-vance for HCMV to establish efficient infections in certain cell types. As a virion envelope glycoprotein, pUL1 has the potential to modulate HCMV host cell tropism. We demonstrate that an HCMV TB40/E mutant lackingUL1displayed attenuated growth in RPE cells, which was not observed for MRC-5 or U373-MG cells. This differential growth phenotype is MOI dependent, being measurable although less apparent at high viral doses. Notably, an involvement in cell tropism was reported previously for other members of the RL11 glycoprotein family: aUL10deletion mu-tant grew better than the parental virus in an epithelial cell line (17), and the RL13 envelope glycoprotein was shown to repress HCMV replication in certain cell types (53). The nature of the inefficient growth associated with the UL1 deficiency is at present

unknown. A possibility is that the UL1 glycoprotein may have a role in entry or egress when replicating in epithelial cells, as rep-resented by RPE cells. As indicated above, and in line with the homology of the UL1 glycoprotein with members of the CEACAM family, an attractive hypothesis to test is whether this viral protein could be interacting with a member of this family at the host cell surface. In addition, the possibility that pUL1 may represent a relevant target of humoral immune responses during HCMV infection should be considered. Future studies will be aimed at clarifying the function(s) of pUL1 during HCMV repli-cation.


This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innova-tion (SAF2010-22153 to M.L.-B. and SAF2008-00382 and SAF2011-25155 to A.A.), the Marie Curie Training Network, European Union (MRTN-CT-2005-019284), and the Carlos III Health Institute/European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (ISCIII/FEDER; Red HERACLES). M.S. and E.M.-M. were supported by MRTN-CT-2005-019284.

We thank Albert Zimmermann and Vu Thuy Khanh Le for scientific advice, William J. Britt and Julia V. Blume for providing antibodies, C. Cothia for revising the alignment between pUL1 and murine CEACAM-1a, and Xavier Sanjuan and Gemma Heredia for technical support.


1.Alba MM, Das R, Orengo CA, Kellam P.2001. Genomewide function conservation and phylogeny in the Herpesviridae. Genome Res.11:43–54. 2.Altschul SF, et al.1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new genera-tion of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res.25:3389 – 3402.

3.Atalay R, et al.2002. Identification and expression of human cytomega-lovirus transcription units coding for two distinct Fcgamma receptor ho-mologs. J. Virol.76:8596 – 8608.

4.Baldick CJ, Jr, Shenk T.1996. Proteins associated with purified human cytomegalovirus particles. J. Virol.70:6097– 6105.

5.Boehme KW, Guerrero M, Compton T.2006. Human cytomegalovirus envelope glycoproteins B and H are necessary for TLR2 activation in per-missive cells. J. Immunol.177:7094 –7102.

6.Borst EM, Hahn G, Koszinowski UH, Messerle M.1999. Cloning of the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) genome as an infectious bacterial arti-ficial chromosome in Escherichia coli: a new approach for construction of HCMV mutants. J. Virol.73:8320 – 8329.

7.Boulton IC, Gray-Owen SD. 2002. Neisserial binding to CEACAM1 arrests the activation and proliferation of CD4⫹T lymphocytes. Nat. Immunol.3:229 –236.

8.Britt B.2007. CMV maturation and egress, p 311–323.InArvin A, et al (ed), Human herpesviruses: biology, therapy, and immunoprophylaxis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

9.Britt WJ, Vugler LG.1992. Oligomerization of the human cytomegalo-virus major envelope glycoprotein complex gB (gp55-116). J. Virol.66: 6747– 6754.

10. Cepeda V, Esteban M, Fraile-Ramos A.2010. Human cytomegalovirus final envelopment on membranes containing both trans-Golgi network and endosomal markers. Cell. Microbiol.12:386 – 404.

11. Cha TA, et al.1996. Human cytomegalovirus clinical isolates carry at least 19 genes not found in laboratory strains. J. Virol.70:78 – 83.

12. Chang CP, Vesole DH, Nelson J, Oldstone MB, Stinski MF. 1989. Identification and expression of a human cytomegalovirus early glycopro-tein. J. Virol.63:3330 –3337.

13. Chee MS, et al.1990. Analysis of the protein-coding content of the sequence of human cytomegalovirus strain AD169. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.154:125–169.

14. Davison AJ, et al.2003. Homology between the human cytomegalovirus RL11 gene family and human adenovirus E3 genes. J. Gen. Virol.84:657– 663.

15. Davison AJ, et al.2003. The human cytomegalovirus genome revisited: comparison with the chimpanzee cytomegalovirus genome. J. Gen. Virol.


on November 7, 2019 by guest



16. Dolan A, et al.2004. Genetic content of wild-type human cytomegalovi-rus. J. Gen. Virol.85:1301–1312.

17. Dunn W, et al.2003. Functional profiling of a human cytomegalovirus genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.100:14223–14228.

18. Dveksler GS, et al.1991. Cloning of the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) receptor: expression in human and hamster cell lines confers susceptibility to MHV. J. Virol.65:6881– 6891.

19. Eddy SR.1998. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics14:755– 763.

20. Elde NC, Malik HS.2009. The evolutionary conundrum of pathogen mimicry. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.7:787–797.

21. Engel P, et al.2011. Human cytomegalovirus UL7, a homologue of the SLAM-family receptor CD229, impairs cytokine production. Immunol. Cell Biol.89:753–766.

22. Felsenstein J.1989. Mathematics vs. evolution: mathematical evolution-ary theory. Science246:941–942.

23. Finn RD, et al.2010. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res.38:D211–D222.

24. Fraile-Ramos A, et al.2002. Localization of HCMV UL33 and US27 in endocytic compartments and viral membranes. Traffic3:218 –232. 25. Gupta R, Brunak S.2002. Prediction of glycosylation across the human

proteome and the correlation to protein function. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 310 –322.

26. Hitomi S, et al.1997. Human cytomegalovirus open reading frame UL11 encodes a highly polymorphic protein expressed on the infected cell sur-face. Arch. Virol.142:1407–1427.

27. Holzerlandt R, Orengo C, Kellam P, Alba MM.2002. Identification of new herpesvirus gene homologs in the human genome. Genome Res.12: 1739 –1748.

28. Hubbard TJ, et al.2007. Ensembl 2007. Nucleic Acids Res.35:D610 – D617.

29. Huber MT, Compton T.1998. The human cytomegalovirus UL74 gene encodes the third component of the glycoprotein H-glycoprotein L-con-taining envelope complex. J. Virol.72:8191– 8197.

30. Kammerer R, Zimmermann W.2010. Coevolution of activating and inhibitory receptors within mammalian carcinoembryonic antigen fami-lies. BMC Biol.8:12.

31. Kohler CP, et al.1994. Use of recombinant virus to assess human cyto-megalovirus early and late promoters in the context of the viral genome. J. Virol.68:6589 – 6597.

32. Kuespert K, Pils S, Hauck CR.2006. CEACAMs: their role in physiology and pathophysiology. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.18:565–571.

33. Lilley BN, Ploegh HL, Tirabassi RS.2001. Human cytomegalovirus open reading frame TRL11/IRL11 encodes an immunoglobulin G Fc-binding protein. J. Virol.75:11218 –11221.

34. Margulies BJ, Browne H, Gibson W.1996. Identification of the human cytomegalovirus G protein-coupled receptor homologue encoded by UL33 in infected cells and enveloped virus particles. Virology225:111– 125.

35. Mocarski ES, Courcelle CT.2001. Cytomegaloviruses and their replica-tion, p 2629 –2673.InKnipe DM, et al (ed), Fields virology, 4th ed. Lip-pincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.

36. Murphy E, et al.2003. Coding potential of laboratory and clinical strains of human cytomegalovirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.100:14976 – 14981.

37. Nielsen H, Engelbrecht J, Brunak S, von Heijne G.1997. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng.10:1– 6.

38. Patrone M, et al.2005. Human cytomegalovirus UL130 protein promotes endothelial cell infection through a producer cell modification of the vi-rion. J. Virol.79:8361– 8373.

39. Pötzsch S, et al.2011. B cell repertoire analysis identifies new antigenic domains on glycoprotein B of human cytomegalovirus which are target of neutralizing antibodies. PLoS Pathog.7:e1002172.

40. Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Klimke W, Maglott DR.2009. NCBI reference sequences: current status, policy and new initiatives. Nucleic Acids Res.


41. Quinnan GV, Jr, et al.1984. Comparative virulence and immunogenicity of the Towne strain and a nonattenuated strain of cytomegalovirus. Ann. Intern. Med.101:478 – 483.

42. Ripalti A, Mocarski ES.1991. The products of human cytomegalovirus genes UL1-UL7, including gp48, are dispensable for growth in cell culture, p 57– 62.InLandini MP (ed), Progress in cytomegalovirus research: pro-ceedings of the Third International Cytomegalovirus Workshop. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

43. Ryckman BJ, et al.2008. Characterization of the human cytomegalovirus gH/gL/UL128-131 complex that mediates entry into epithelial and endo-thelial cells. J. Virol.82:60 –70.

44. Sanchez V, Angeletti PC, Engler JA, Britt WJ. 1998. Localization of human cytomegalovirus structural proteins to the nuclear matrix of in-fected human fibroblasts. J. Virol.72:3321–3329.

45. Sanchez V, Greis KD, Sztul E, Britt WJ.2000. Accumulation of virion tegument and envelope proteins in a stable cytoplasmic compartment during human cytomegalovirus replication: characterization of a poten-tial site of virus assembly. J. Virol.74:975–986.

46. Sanchez V, Sztul E, Britt WJ. 2000. Human cytomegalovirus pp28 (UL99) localizes to a cytoplasmic compartment which overlaps the endo-plasmic reticulum-Golgi-intermediate compartment. J. Virol.74:3842– 3851.

47. Sekulin K, Gorzer I, Heiss-Czedik D, Puchhammer-Stockl E. 2007. Analysis of the variability of CMV strains in the RL11D domain of the RL11 multigene family. Virus Genes35:577–583.

48. Sinzger C, et al.2008. Cloning and sequencing of a highly productive, endotheliotropic virus strain derived from human cytomegalovirus TB40/E. J. Gen. Virol.89:359 –368.

49. Sinzger C, et al.1999. Modification of human cytomegalovirus tropism through propagation in vitro is associated with changes in the viral ge-nome. J. Gen. Virol.80(Pt 11):2867–2877.

50. Slevogt H, et al.2008. CEACAM1 inhibits Toll-like receptor 2-triggered antibacterial responses of human pulmonary epithelial cells. Nat. Immu-nol.9:1270 –1278.

51. Spaderna S, Blessing H, Bogner E, Britt W, Mach M.2002. Identifica-tion of glycoprotein gpTRL10 as a structural component of human cyto-megalovirus. J. Virol.76:1450 –1460.

52. Spaderna S, et al.2005. Deletion of gpUL132, a structural component of human cytomegalovirus, results in impaired virus replication in fibro-blasts. J. Virol.79:11837–11847.

53. Stanton RJ, et al.2010. Reconstruction of the complete human cytomeg-alovirus genome in a BAC reveals RL13 to be a potent inhibitor of repli-cation. J. Clin. Invest.120:3191–3208.

54. Talbot P, Almeida JD.1977. Human cytomegalovirus: purification of enveloped virions and dense bodies. J. Gen. Virol.36:345–349. 55. Tan K, et al. 2002. Crystal structure of murine sCEACAM1a[1,4]: a

coronavirus receptor in the CEA family. EMBO J.21:2076 –2086. 56. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG.2002. Multiple sequence

align-ment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics2:2.3. 57. Varnum SM, et al.2004. Identification of proteins in human

cytomega-lovirus (HCMV) particles: the HCMV proteome. J. Virol.78:10960 – 10966.

58. Wagner M, Gutermann A, Podlech J, Reddehase MJ, Koszinowski UH.

2002. Major histocompatibility complex class I allele-specific cooperative and competitive interactions between immune evasion proteins of cyto-megalovirus. J. Exp. Med.196:805– 816.

59. Wang D, Shenk T.2005. Human cytomegalovirus virion protein complex required for epithelial and endothelial cell tropism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.102:18153–18158.

60. Yao F, Courtney RJ.1992. Association of ICP0 but not ICP27 with purified virions of herpes simplex virus type 1. J. Virol.66:2709 –2716. 61. Yu D, Smith GA, Enquist LW, Shenk T.2002. Construction of a

self-excisable bacterial artificial chromosome containing the human cytomeg-alovirus genome and mutagenesis of the diploid TRL/IRL13 gene. J. Virol.

76:2316 –2328.

on November 7, 2019 by guest



TABLE 1 Amino acid substitutions per site in viral protein pairwisecomparisonsa
FIG 2 Kinetics of UL1 gene expression. (A) Whole-cell RNA was isolated from uninfected (mock) MRC-5 cells or cells infected at an MOI of 2 with HCMVAD169 at the indicated hours postinfection
FIG 4 Subcellular localization of pUL1-HA in a cytoplasmic compartment. MRC-5 cells grown on glass coverslips were infected with AD169 UL1-HA at an MOIof 5 and fixed at 72 h p.i
FIG 5 Colocalization with tegument and envelope HCMV proteins. MRC-5 cells grown on glass coverslips were infected with AD169 UL1-HA at an MOI of 5and fixed at 72 h p.i


Related documents

status, resected lymph node status and degree of tumor differentiation significantly.

Therefore, although T lymphocytes appear to be an important early target in tissues, the high viral load that accompanies either primary or terminal clinical illness is

Cells were stained with the anti-CD4 MAb or with the anti-CD8 MAb as a control and analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. In cells infected with the control vector, surface levels of CD4

A descriptive study to assess the knowledge and practice of substance abuse among adolescents in a selected higher secondary school at Madurai – 2011 was undertaken by N..

To determine if the viral DNA was capable of integrat- ing into the host genome, we first performed a Southern hy- bridization analysis on DNAs from both STSV1 and RT8-4 cells

Dadresanfar B et al 11 (2011) studied Efficacy of two rotary systems in removing gutta-percha and sealer from the root canal wall and concluded that Mtwo R without the

the relationship between assessment criteria and disciplinary standards, an inability to articulate the desirable qualities of assessment tasks, a lack of consensus among teaching

ABSTRACT The thesis examines how American writers in the popular genres of Female Gothic, Horror, and Science Fiction interact with strands of mainly American feminist thought