Physics and Astronomy Publications
Physics and Astronomy
3-1979
Electromodulation spectroscopy of excitons in
simple cubic TlCl and TlBr
John Frederick McClelland
Iowa State University
David W. Lynch
Iowa State University
, [email protected]
Follow this and additional works at:
http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/physastro_pubs
Part of the
Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Commons
,
Condensed Matter Physics
Commons
, and the
Optics Commons
The complete bibliographic information for this item can be found athttp://lib.dr.iastate.edu/physastro_pubs/60. For information on how to cite this item, please visithttp://lib.dr.iastate.edu/howtocite.html.
Electromodulation spectroscopy of excitons in simple cubic TlCl and TlBr
Abstract
Transmission and electromodulated transmission spectra have been measured in the direct Wannier exciton
region for TlCl and TlBr. The spectra were obtained at a sample temperature between 5 and 6 K for a range of
applíed electric fields. The data have been reduced to obtain the electric-field-induced changes in the dielectric
function and compared in detail to the calculations of Blossey. The experimental results support the trends
predicted by the calculations.
Keywords
Ames Laboratory, Wannier, dielectric function
Disciplines
Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics | Condensed Matter Physics | Optics | Physics
Comments
This article is from
Physical Review B
19 (1979): 3244, doi:
10.1103/PhysRevB.19.3244
. Posted with
permission.
PH Y
SICAI,
REVIE% 8
VOI,IJMK19,
15
MARCH l979
Electromodulation
spectroscopy
of
excitons
in simplecubic
TlCl
andTlBr
J. F.
MeClelland and D.%.
LynchAmes
I.
aboratory-USDOE and Department ofPhysics, Iowa State.Uniuersity, Ames, Iowa 50011(Received=10 October 1978)
Transmission and electromodulated transmission spectra have been measured in the direct Wannier exciton region for Tlcland T18r.The spectra were obtained at a sample temperature between 5and 6Kfor a range
ofapplied electric fields. The data have been reduced to obtain the electric-field-induced changes in the dielectric function and compared indetail tothe calculations ofBlossey. The experimental results support the trends predicted by the calculations.
I. INTROI)UCTION
Certain features observed in the optical spectra ofsome crystalline insulators and semiconductors provided an early indication of.inadequacies in
s~mple band theory. The Frenkel excxton model'
was successful in explaining rionband features
which had been observed xn alkali halide spectra.
.'
Later Wannier excitons' were postulated, prior
to the experimental work.
'
Subsequently opticalmeasurements on Ge' were interpreted on the
basis of.Wannier excitons in the important work
by Elliott.
'
Much of the electronic structure notencompassed by band theory has now been clarified for high dielectric constant solids by adding energy
levels associated with Wannier exciton states and
altering nearby band
states.
However, effortsto make detailed quantitative comparisons between
the results of calculations based on the Wannier
model and experimental measurements often have
been djLfficult because the hydrogenic energy levels
ofthe ideal Wannier exciton
are
nearly alwayssignificantly perturbed by interactions with the
crystal.
This results in a shifting and broadening of exciton energy levels and often additional stateswhich are outside the scope of the simple Wannier
model.
Modulation spectroscopic techniques' ean be
used for quantitative studies ofboth exciton states
and band structures. They provide sharper
deriv-ative
spectra,
usually as a function of an externalperturbation applied to the sample. The sharper spectra may al.}owa more quantitative
test
of theexciton model than would be afforded by the
unmod-ulated
spectra;
however, oneis
then testing theexciton model's ability to predict spectral changes
as a function ofan applied perturbation rather than
directly testing the unperturbed model.
.
Electric
and magnetic field modulation are most appropriate for Wannier exciton studies becausethey cause a direct perturbation to the exciton
Hamiltonian. The most detailed calculations for
comparison with experimental results have been
done for
electr
jefjeld modulatjon8 io and a nu ber of experimental comparisons have been made."'
"~ Definitive comparisonsbetween
ex-periment and theory have been difficult due to a
scarcity
of solids having ideal Wannier excitonstates with low broadening, difficulties with both
sample preparation and modulation, and the
com-plexity Of data reduction to enable comparison with
theory in terms of the field-induced changes in the complex dielectric function.
Progress
is reported in this work toward amor'e quantitative comparison of experimental
re-sults with the detailed electroabsorption
calcula-tions ofBlossey.
'
"
Section IIof this paper willinclude a discussion ofthe thallium halide samples used in the investigation and a description of the
exper imental rneasur ement system. Data-reduc-.
tion methods
are
covered inSec. III.
Results ofthe measurements are presented in
Sec.
IV,fol-lowed by the comparison ofresults to
Blossey's
calculations in
Sec.
V. Finally, aconclusion isgiven in
Sec.
IV.II. SAMPLESAND EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS
Thin-film simple-cubic samples of T1Cl and
TlBr
were prepared for the excitonelectromodu-lation studies in the region ofthe lowest-energy
direct interband transition at the
J
point in theBrillouin zone.
"+
The electrotransmissionmea-surements were not extended to the indirect
band-gap region because the excitons associated with
this region do not fit the assumptions of Blossey's
theory and substantially thicker samples would have been
r
equired than are appropr iate for thedirect-transition region. The influence ofthe in-direct transitions was, however, present in the
direct exciton electromodulation measurements
through photocarriers associated in part with the
indirect transitions which complicated establishing
ELECTROMODULATION
SPECTROSCOPY
OFEXCITONS
iN. .
.
This aspect will be addressed in more detail in
Sec.
IV,TlCl and
TlBr are
good candidates for Wannierexciton studies because they have very high
di-electric
constants, '437.
6 and35.1,
respectively.The exciton Bohr radius to lattice constant
ratios"
for TlC1 and
TlBr
are 20 and 15, while theexci-ton binding
energies" are
11.
7 and9.
8 meV,re-spectively, The
direct
excitons have anumber of associated energy states whichare
outside thescope of the simple Wannier exciton model. These states have been attributed to inter- and
intra-valley scattering of
excitons"
and to phononside-bands.
"'"
These"extra"
states,
however, have not caused serious interference to observations ofthe hydrogenic exciton levels as demonstrated in remarkable detail by spectroscopicmeasure-ments"
using aperturbing magnetic field.The magnetic field measurements were made
possible by asample preparation
method"'"
which allowed thin-film samples to be cooled to
helium temperature to reduce thermal broadening
without inducing strain in the film due to the usual
thermal expansion mismatch between a thin film
and its substrate. Samples prepared by this meth-od consist of athin film evaporated on a very
thin methacrylate membrane. The membrane
is
supported by a frame cut from a single crystal of
the compound being evaporated, thus providing a
close match in thermal expansion coefficients
be-tween the film and substrate. This method was initially tried for the electromodulation
measure-'ments conducted in this study but proved
imprac-tical
due to a coupling effect, which does not occurwith a magnetic field, between the membrane-supported thin-film sample and the modulating
electric
field."
The coupling was due to spatially inhomogeneous regions in theelectric
fjeld whichdrew the dielectric film toward higher-field regions, thereby inducing a strain modulation in the sample. This resulted in amodulated
trans-mission spectrum containing components due to both
electric
and strain modulation which couldnot easily be separated for comparison to theory. To control the strain modulation problem,
samples"
were evaporated on methacrylate-membrane-covered solidCsI
substrates whichhave an expansion
coefficient"
close to those ofthe thallium
halides"
being studied. The mem-brane prevented diffusion' between the film andsubstrate and provided a slip plane to relieve strain in the film. The strain
relief
was, however,not complete and these samples had ahigher level
of
static
strain"
than was associated with theframe-supported membrane configuration. The substrates were mounted between
Teflon-insulated plates which formed a capacitor sample
WAVELFNGTH SIGNAL LIGHT
SOURCE
Lt('HT I
MONO-BEAM
g
CHROMATOR CHOPPERSERVOED
~
LAMP POWERQUARTZ SAMPLE TRANSMISSON
PLATE SIGNAL
~PHOTOMULTIPLIERS
2
CHOPPER DRIVE AND
REFERENCE
SIGNAL
SOURCE
LAMP CONTROL
FEED
BACK SIGNAL
HIGH VOI TAGE SUPPLIES
LAMP SERVO CIRCUIT
,AND POWER SUPPLY REFERENCE
SIGNAL
WA VE LEN GTH ENCODER
LOCK-IN AMPLIF IER
FIG.
1.
Blockdiagram ofthe experimentalmeasure-ment system as operated fortransmission
measure-ments.
mount" attached to the cold finger of
a cryostat.
The Teflon prevented injection luminescence and
provided padding during cool down. The
evapora-tion was done in situ at a
rate
of 4.0-6.
0nm/minin avacuum in the low 10
'-
to high 10'-Torr
range with the substrate at room temperature.
The quartz evaporation boat was charged with
single-crystal chips ofTlCl or
TlBr
from theHarshaw Chemical Company. The boat could be
translated in vacuum between a position adjacent
to a quartz crystal thickness monitor, where the
evaporation
rate
was established, and a positioninfront ofthesubstrate. Film thicknesses were in
the
50-70-nm
range and were checked byinter-ferrometric
measurements on films deposited simultaneously on a glass slide mounted adjacentto the sample substrate. The low thickness limit
was imposed by a thin-film disorder problem often found in sir@pie-cubic thallium halide films
below 50-.nm thickness. The upper limit was
set,
as a result of experience, to reduce photocarrier effects which interfere with the
electric
fieldmodulation.
"
The experimental measurement
system"
en-abled the determination ofthe transmission Tand the electromodulated transmission bT/T
spectra
ofsamples near helium temperature. Figure 1
shows a block diagram of the system as operated
for transmission measurements. The light beam
originates at a quartz halogen l,amp, in the upper
left-hand corner of
Fig.
1, and is focused on theentrance
slit
of a McPherson model 218mono-chromator after being chopped
for
synchronousdetection. After passing through the
monochroma-tor
the beam has abandpass of0.
08-0.
16nm orapproximately
0.
7-1.
4meV, andis
focused on theJ.
F.
NIcCLELLAND ANDD.
W. LYNCH 19 to amonitoring photomultiplier. This detector ispart of afeedback loop which maintains an
approxi-mately constant beam intensity on the sample by
automatically adjusting the lamp power during
wavelength scans.
"
The photomultiplier,position-ed after the sample, provides a signal
proportion-al to the transmitted light intensity which is
pro-cessed
by a lock-in amplifier and plotted by are-corder synchronized to the wavelength scan by an
encoder. Scans were also taken with the sample removed from the beam to provide a correction
curve forthe servo system due tosmall differences
in the optical paths and detector responses. The
wavelength was calibrated with Qsram line source
lamps.
The bT/T operating mode is shown in the block
diagram in
Fig. 2.
In this mode the beam intensity was neither chopped nor servoed prior to reachingthe sample. A unipolar 50%duty-cycle
square-wave voltage of up to 10kV was applied at 200
Hz to the sample by capacitor plates with a spacing
of
1.
8 mm. Theelectric
field modulation resultedin a transmission modulation at wavelengths where
field-sensitive exciton features
exist.
In theseregions there was a corresponding accomponent
added to the dc transmission signal from the
photo-multipler. The ac photomultiplier signal was
ap-proximately proportional to
hT/T
when a servo system, as shown inFig.
2, automatically main-tained the dc photomultiplier signal at a constant value by adjusting the voltage appliedacross
thephotomultiplier.
"
A lock-in amplifier processedthe ac signal which was plotted with the dc signal on a chart
recorder.
III. DATAREDUCTION METHODS
bT
1BT
1 BTT (hv,g)=
—
TBn an(hv,'g)+—
TBk
ah(hv, g)and
n6(hv, g)=
—
B8sn(hv, g)+—
BL9ah(hv, g)Bg ' Bk (2)
for by& and Ak, the field-induced changes in the real and imaginary parts of the index of
refrac-tion, respectively. AT/T and 1/T were provided
by the experimental measurements.
~6,
theelectric-field-induced change in the transmission
phase shift, was calculated with the
Kramers-Kronig expression,
a9(hv,
g)=-
hv in[1 +6 T/T(hv„g)]d(hvo)(hv,
)'
—(hv)'The limits ofintegration spanned the direct
band-gap exciton region since contributions fromother regions are expected to be negligible. Equation (3) was derived from the Kramers-Kronig phase shift formula" and the integration was performed
by computer. The partial derivative expressions
were derived from standard thin-film formulas.
"
The 6&,and Ae, spectra were calculated from The T(hv, g) and hT/T(hv, g)
spectra
werere-duced to the electric-field-induced changes in
the real and imaginary parts ofthe dielectric
function, b,
e,
(hv, g) and b,e,
(hv,g),
respectively.The symbols hv and
$
represent the photon energyand applied
electric
field amplitude, respectively.Data reduction to obtain Ae, and Ae, spectra
re-quired solving simultaneous equations given by
WAVELENGTH SIGNAL ELECTRIC FIELD
CAPACITOR SAMPLE
PHOTOMULTIPLIER
AC AND CONSTANT SERVOED Ii DCSIGNALS
PM HIGH VOLTAGE
LIGHT SOURCE
LIGHT MONO-BEAM CHROMATOR
HIGH VOLTAGE SQUAREWAVE SIGNAL
I
HIGH VOLTAGE SQUAREWAVE GENERATOR AND REFERENCE
SIGNAL SOURCE
CONSTANT DC
SIGNAL SERVO SYSTEM REFERENCESIG~
WAVE FORM MONITOR
OSCILLOSCOPE
LOCK-IN OUTPUT
«ACSIGNAL
LOCK-IN AMPLIF IER
CON STANT
DCSIGNAL
J
WAVE LENGTH ENCODER
CHART
RECORDER
FIG.2. Blockdiagram ofthe experimental
measure-ment system as operated for electromodulated
trans-mission measurements.
and
~~,
=2k~~+ 2n~k,which are derived from the usual expressions
re-lating the index of refraction and dielectric
func-tion. Both these equations and the partial
deriva-tive expressions require
spectra
ofz
and kforthe thallium halides, the methacrylate membrane,
and
CsI.
The latter two were obtained from a mea-surement" and the literature,"
respectively. Then and k data used for the thalium halides were
values measured by Bachrach'4 which were
adjust-ed to account for ahigher level of static strain in the samples used in this study. The adjusted values were obtained by programming acomputer to search over ranges near the literature values
to locate n and kvalues which produced a
19
ELECTROMODULATION
SPECTROSCOPY
OFEXCITONS
IN. .
.
the experimental measurement. This procedureresulted in multiple solutions and final values of
z
and k were determined by starting at low photonenergy where k
=0
and n. is known, and workinggraphically to higher photon energy, using
require-ments of continuity ofn and P
pairs,
the knowngeneral functional form for yg and k in this region,
and calculations to check the. agreement between
calculated and measured transmission. The values
ofn and kfinally obtained gave calculated
trans-mission
spectra
which reproduced the experimentalspectra
for both T1C1andTlBr.
IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTSSpectra of.
hT/T,
Ae„and
Ae, are presented inthis section at two applied field strengths
for
T1C1and
T18r.
The unmodulatedspectra are
includedin each figure for comparison. The primary
fea-tures of these
spectra
and others taken on thesame samples at different applied fields are com-pared to the results of
Blossey's
calculations inSec.
V.The Tand AT/T spectra are shown in
Figs.
3and 4for TlCl and
TlBr,
reSpeetiveely, at sampletemperatures between 5 and 6 K. The locations
of the yg
=1,
2, and~
hydrogenic energystates
are
marked, with
~
denoting theseries
limit atthe conduction-band edge. The n=2position waslo-cated in Fig, 3 by calculating the energy spacing
from the ~
=1
peak using the reported excitonbinding
energy"
and the hydrogenic model. Theenergies of other .expected spectral features were plotted relative to the n
=1
peak using energy spacings fromRef. 16.
The primed featurescor-respond to splittings of the hydrogenic levels
0.
6-0.5—
04—
O.i—
0.
0-—
I I I I I I I I I I
TIBr(sc)
JB
g
—
TRANSMISSION6.0kV
p ----xIO
'
—7.2 —6.4
O
56
Z.' CO (A (f)40
(f) 5.2 CL 24 I.6 o. ~-2I I I I I I I I I I
2.98 5.00 3.02 5.04 5.06
PHOTON ENERGY (eV)
FIG.4. Tlar transmission (dashed line) and electro-modulated transmission spectra attwo applied voltages.
-O.
I-—0.8
caused by the
inter-
and intravalley scattering perturbation."
The n and Psymbols denote the locations of the phonon sidebandfeatures.
"'6
Thespectra
for T1Brdo not show as much resolved structure due to threefactors:
the lower exeitonbinding energy and splitting
charaeteristie
ofTlBr,
the greater thermal broadening caused by alower
Debye temperature, and the higher applied fields.
Figures 5 and 6 show the q, and Ae,
spectra
forTlC1 and
TlBr,
respectively, which werecalcula-ted from the spectra shown in
Figs.
3 and 4. The main effect of theelectric
field, as seen in the~q,
spectra,is
abroadening and attenuation of themajor positive and negative &,peaks below the
direct band-gap corresponding to g=
~
whileos-cillations appear in the 6&,
spectra
above thebandgap, as predicted by theory 8-io
The e, and
~q,
spectraare
shown inFigs.
7 and 8for T1C1andT1Br,
respectively. The Ae,spec-I I I I I I I I T I
0.8— a
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
04—
ooI-x I—
L
04--0.
8-I.0—
0,5— 0.0— L-0.5— —I.O— c) ON .56 .48 40o .32K&
(/)
a
.I6fl=
.08 .00
l.2— 0.8
—-AJ
o 04
x 0.
0---—0.4
0.0
O
x -04 L
—0.8
I
2
I.5IIV
TICI(sc)
.0kv
a 20.0
—I6.0
I2.0
8.0
4.0 0.0
—4.0 —8.0
I I I. I I I I I I I I I
3;36 3.38 3.40 3,42 3.44 3.46. 3.48 3.50
PHOTON ENERGY (eV)
FIG.
3.
TlCl transmission (dotted line) andelectro-modulated transmission spectra at two applied voltages..
I I I I I I I I I 1 l I I I I
3.38 3.40 3.42 3.44 3.46 3.48 3.50
PHOTON ENERGY (eV)
FIG.5. Ee&spectra (solid lines) and e&spectrum
(dotted 1ine)ofTICI. The marked photon energy
J.
F.
McCLELLA1VD ANDD.
W. LYNCH 198.0— I I I I I I
—16.0
2.
0-0.0
-2.
0--4.0—
.0kv
TIBr (sc)
—12.0
8.0
4.0
0.0
—-4.0
l
I 1
(I —-8.0
80 . I I I t
298 3.00 3.02 3.04 3.06
PHOTON ENERGY {eV}
FK".6. Ae~spectra (solid and dotted lines) and e&
spectrum (dashed line) ofTlBr. The marked photon
energy locations coincide with those in Fig.
4.
1.0.— 9.5
kV--0.0—
6.0kv
~
-30-C]
-4.0—
-5.0—
-6.0—
-7.0—
298
Il 'lI
ll
(I a
TIBr(sc)
I
0
I P
/
IM I I I I I I I
3.00 3.02 3.04 3.06
PHOTON ENERGY (eV)
—18.0 —
16.0 —14.0
—12.0
—10.0 ep —8.0 —60
—40 —2.0 0.0
FIG.8. 4e2(solid and dotted lines) and e&spectra
forTlBr.
tra
also show the peak broadening and attenuationeffect of the field below n
=~
and the higher photonenergy oscillations. A small amount of peak shifting ofuncertain orgin occurs in the
hc,
spec-tra
relative to theaT/T
spectra for featuresas-sociated with the hydrogenic exciton
states.
Inall
cases
these shiftsare
small fractions of thelinewidths ofthe unmodulated
spectra.
The photonenergy locations labeled in
Figs,
7and 8coincidewith those in
Figs.
3 and4.
V. COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS TO CALCULATIONS
A detailed comparison is made in this section
between the measurements and
Blossey's
calcula-tions for the primary spectral features as a
func-tion ofthe applied
electric
field modulation ampli-tude. The primaryspectral
features, as designa-ted inRef. 9,
are shown inFig.
9.
A spectral broadening parameter,
'
I' =0.
2A,was selected on the basis of acomparison between
calculated and measured line shapes for
unmodu-lated
spectra.
8
is
the exciton binding energy.This
is
a larger value than the sampletempera-ture would have indicated due to the broadening of
the
spectra
by strain.The
first
comparison of experimental spectral features to theory is shown in a6
e, plot ofthezero-crossing
separationhZ,
/R vsg/g,
shownin the upper left-hand corner oi
Fig. 10.
AZ,/Ris defined in
Fig. 9,
gis
theelectric
fieldcalcula-ted from the applied voltage and plate separation,
and
g,
is the exciton ionization fief.d' defined asthe exciton binding energy divided by the product ofthe exciton Bohr radius and the electronic
1.2
0.8
O 04 L
0.0
-0.4
CO
21 I
1.5kv
T t T t
I —20.0
I6.0 I2.0
8.0
0.0
hl
6E,
PHOTON ENE RGY
CI
0.4
0.0
-0.4
C&
~-0.8
L
- 1.2
TICl (sc)
h,
Pj-IPTQN ENc Ri-y
I I I I j I I I I I I I j I I
3.36 3.38 3.40 3.42 3.44 3.46 3.48 3.50
PHOTON ENERGY (eV)
FIG.
7.
4E'2(solid lines) and e2(dotted line) spectra
for T1C1.
FIG.
9.
Primary electromodulation spectral features19 ,
ELECTROMODULATION
SPECTROSCOPY
OFEXCITONS
IN. . .
32490
Ip—
0
0
CU
LLJ
m=0.
67
.
.
-l
TICI.
~6.
0
V TIBr60kV
m=0.
50
CU
6e(
TIBr
.
TICI0 'ha
Ip Ip~
Ipo Io~ I
0~
E.
/6,
(calculated from voltage)IO i
pl
I I I I I I I
0
E,/E.
,
(Effective)Ip—
~
T
IBrIO'-00 o
~ TIBr
.
TICIE./E& (Effective)
Ipo O-l
E/E,
(Effective)
FIG.10. Experimental zero-crossing separations for the Dc~ and Ae2 spectra plotted as afunction o'fapplied
effec-tive field, asdescribed in the text. The ordinate labels are defined in Fig.9, .The solid and dashed lines are plotted
from Blossey's calculations (Ref. 9).
charge. The gl values were calculated
for
TlCland T1Brfrom the exciton parameters given in
Ref. 16.
The dashed line has been fit to the pointscalculated by
Blossey'
and denoted by squares inFig. 10.
The experimental curves are low in bothmagnitude and slope until the square-wave voltage
amplitude reaches the 6-kV region. The slopes
then become approximately equal to those predicted
by theory. The most likely cause for the
discrep-ancy between theory and experiment appears .to be
alowering of the field sensed by the excitons due
to the presence of
photocarriers.
This causeis
suggested both by electroreflection measurements"
on T1C1and
TlBr
by other workers and byobser-vations made during the measurements reported
here which can be explained on the basis of
photo-carriers.
'."'
Since quantitative photocarriermea-surements were- not possible during this study, no
detailed explanation could be definitely established for the role of
photocarriers.
To provide themost useful comparison of experimental results
to theory, effective fields sensed by the exciton
were calibrated
for
each applied voltage by using the experimental b,E,
/R values and the theoreticalcurve in the b,e, plot ofn,
E,
/It vs g/gz. Theef-fective field values were read from the
abscissa
and used for the other plots in
Figs.
10and11.
Figure 10 shows the other b,&,and hq,
zero-crossing separation plots using the effective-field values. The variouszero-crossing
separationsplotted on the ordinates of the graphs
are
definedin
Fig.
9, The plots show reasonably goodagree-ment with theory in the high-field regions where
the calculated results
are
represented by the solidlines.
Blossey's
results did not extend to thelow-field region of the plots, Ifthe calculated lines
are
extended linearly to the low-field region the experimental points are too low relative to thetheoretical extrapolation. This could be due to the
effects of photocarriers,
inter-
and intravalleyJ.
F.
MCCLELLAND ANDD.
%.
LYNCH3250
IOI-PEAK
kEIGkT
CALIBRATION
Io—
1 T I I I I I
.
TIBr.
TICIdd
0 0
100
IOI
IO', J I J I
Io
E,/E,
& (Effective)
I
Io
E,/E:, (Effective)
0
.
TIBrTICI
I I
IP IP
E,
/E,
(Effective)TIBr
TICI
I I
Io
,
IoF/E,
(Effective)0 0 0
Io Io ip2
Io
Io—
I I OI &eI
0 0
I I I I I i
0 0 0
0 6
0
Og
TIBr
TICI
TIBr
* TICI
IP J L I I I
~
t t IIp0
E/F
&
(Ef
fective)Io
IO I
.
IO'
F /E& (Effective)
IOI
ofh, vs
g/g,
(effective) in the upper left-handcorner of Fig. 11was used to scale the
experi-mental peak heights. The curve
is
shown with adashed region extended with a drafting curve to
allow scaling of the lower-field data. The h, peak heights ofboth AE'y and
he,
are too high relativewhere the applied field
is
less
dominant.Figure 11shows the 6&,and 6&,experimental peak heights plotted on the ordinates as a function
ofthe effective field. The various peak heights, denoted by the letter h with different subscripts,
are
defined inFig.
9.
The calculated Ae, curveF)G.gl. Experimental peak heights for the 6&fand &e2 spectra plotted as afunction ofapplied effective field, as
described in the text. The ordinate labels are defined in Fig.
9.
The solid lines are.plotted from Blossey's calculations19
E
LECT ROMODU LAT IONSPECTROSCOPY
0
FEXCITO
NSIN.
..
3251to theory. The other experimental peak heights
are
reasonably well clustered around the calcula;— ted curves.VI. CONCLUSIONS
This study is the most comprehensive effort
reported to date to compare Wannier exciton
elec-tromodulation calculations to experimental results
in terms of the electric-field-induced changes in the dielectric function.
Earlier
efforts havegen-erally involved
less
resolved structure andneg-lected to obtain results in terms of the dielectric
function for comparison to theory.
The measurements reported here are comprom-ised,
as
most previous investigations have been,by nonintrinsic broadening mechanisms and by
difficulties in applying awell-defined
electric
fieldmodulation, apparently due, in this
case,
to thepresence of photocarriers. The measurements do
support the general trends predicted by
Blossey's
calculations, regardless of these experimental
problems. The study also indicates some ofthe
problems which should be addressed in planning
improved measurements.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
%e
would like to acknowledge the assistanceofDr.
T.
Pinter in the computer program codingand Dr.
C.
Culp in the design of the high-voltagesquare-wave generator. Thanks are due to
Dr.
D.Blossey and Dr. H. Bachrach for providing
ex-panded plots ofgraphs. This work was supported
by the U.
S.
Department of Energy, Office ofBasic
Energy
Sciences,
MaterialsSciences
Division.~J.Frenkel, Phys. Rev. 37, 17, 1276(1931).
.R.Hilsch and R.W. Pohl, Z.Phys. 48, 384 (1928);
59, 145(1930).
G.H. Wannier, Phys. Rev. 52, 191 (1937).
4E.
F.
Gross, Nuovo Cimento Suppl. 3, 672 (1956).~G.G.Macfarlane,
T. P.
McLean,J.
E.
Quarrington,and V. Roberts, Phys. Rev. 108, 1377 (1957).
R.
J.
Elliott, Phys. Bev. 108, 1384 (1957).VM.Cardona, Modulation Spectroscopy {Academic,
New York, 1969);Semiconductors and Semimetals,
edited by R.K.Willardson and A.C.Beer {Academic,
New York, 1972), Vol.
9.
8D.
F.
Blossey, Phys. Bev.B2, 3976(1970).D.
F.
Blossey, Phys. Rev. B3,1382(1971). ~D.
F.
Blossey andP.
Handler, inSemiconductors andSemi.metals, edited by R.K.Willardson and A.C.
Beer (Academic, New York, 1970), Vol.
9.
(a)
J.
Bordas andE.
A.Davis, Solid State Commun. 12, 717(1973);Surf. Sci. 37, 828 {1973);Phys. StatusSolidi B 60, 505 (1973);A; Daunois,
J.
L.
Deiss, andS.
Nikitine, ibid. 68, 65I (1975);L.
A.Ardeeva,P. I.
Perov, and M.
I.
Elinson, ibid. 63, K76 (1974); (b)H.Overhof and
J.
Treusch, Solid State Commun. 9, 53(1971);M.Inove andM. Ikazuki,
J.
Phys. Soc.Jpn.31,1315 (1971);J.
Overton andJ.
P.
Hernandez, Phys. Rev. B7, 778(1973);
J.
P.
Van Dyke and G. A.Samara, ibid.11,
4935(1975);J.
Treusch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1343(1975)
.
~2R.Shimizu and
T.
Koda,J.
Phys. Soc.Jpn. 38, 1550 (1975).'
J.
F.
McClelland, Ph. D.thesis (Iowa State University,1976)(unpublished).
4R.
P.
Lowndes, Phys. Lett. 21, 15 (1966);K.Hojen-dahl, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab. Mat.
-Fys.
Medd. 16,No. 2 (1938).
R.Z.Bachrach and
F.
C.Brown, Phys. Rev. B1,
818(1970).
S.Kurita and K.Kobayashi,
J.
Phys. Soc. Jpn. 30,1645(1971).
7E. Mohler, G.Schogl, and
J.
Treusch, Phys. Rev.Lett. 27, 424 (1971);Ch.Uihlein and
J.
Treusch,Solid State Commun. 17, 685 (1975);S.Kurita, K.
Ko-bayashi, and Y.Onodera, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.
57, 10(1975);S.Kondo, K.Nakamura, M. Fujita,
and Y.Nakai,
J.
Phys. Soc. Jpn. 37, 573 (1974);38,1400 (1975); S,Kurita, K. Kobayashi, and M.
Matsus-hita, ibid. 33, 270(1972).
'8A.
C.
Bailey andB.
Yates, Philos. Mag. 16,1241(1967).
~~A. D.Redmond and
B.
Yates,J.
Phys. 5, 1589 (1972).S.Kurihara, K.Fueki, and
T.
Muraibo,J.
Solid StateChem. 8, 229 (1973).
2~P.O.Nilsson, Appl. Opt. 7, 435 (1968).
H Wolter inEncyclopedia ofPhysics edited by
S.Flugge {Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1956), Vol. 24. V.N.Vpshnevs'kPi' and
I.
V.Slefans'kyi, Ukrayin.Fiz. Zh. {USSR)
11,
75 (1966)(in Ukranian).2R.
Z.Baehrach, Ph. D. thesis (University of Illinois,
1969)(unpublished);,
2~J.