Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
12-1-1981
Second nature
Joseph Solan
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion
in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact
ritscholarworks@rit.edu
.
Recommended Citation
SECOND
NATURE
by
Jo
s eph
M
.
So
l a n
Su
bmitte d in
Pa r t i al Fulfillment of the
Requirements
f
or
the Degree
MA
STER
OF FINE ART
S
MFA PH
O
TOGRAPHY
PROGRAM
SCH
OOL O
F PH
OTOGRAP
H I
C
ARTS AND SCIENCES
R
OCHESTER
INSTITUT
E
OF
TE
CHNOLOG
Y
ROC
HESTER .
NEW Y
ORK
Dec
ember
.
1
9
81
o
f
Techno l
og
y
O
w
e
n B
utler
,
C
ha i r per son
Roc
he s t e r
I
nsti tut e o
f Te
chnol ogy
11./
If
'
---"iL-J
_
K
a t hl e e n
Col l in s
Roc
he st e r Ins
tit ut e
R
o
be r t
Koch
R
OCHESTER
INSTITUTE OF TECHN
OLOGY
C
OLLEGE O
F GRAPHIC ARTS AND PH
OTOGRAPHY
PER
MISSI ON
F
ORM
I
pref
er
t
o
be co
nta
ct ed
ea
c h
ti
me
a req
ue st
for repr
oduction
i
s
mad
e.
I
c
an be r
eac he d
at t
he
f
ollowing
ad
dre s s.
Table
ofContents
Preface
i
Introduction
ii
Thesis
Proposal
iv
Proposal
:Scope
andBackground
vProposal
:Procedure
viAbstract
1
The
Use
ofColor
9
Thesis
Sharing
11
Conclusion
14
Illustrations
1?
Afterward
2.6
Technical
Considerations
27
Glossary
28
Bibliography
29
Index
ofIllustrations
THE
DOOR,
Rochester,
N.Y
17
OLANA,
Hudson,
N.Y
18
NEAR
SCHOEN
PLACE,
Pittsfoxd,
N.Y
19
GENESEE
CROSSING,
Rochester,
N.Y
20
UNDER
THE
RIP
VAN
WINKLE
BRIDGE,
Catskill
,N.Y.
...21STREAM,
Tannersville,
N.Y
22
FROZEN
CANAL
I,
Bushnell
's
Basin,
N.Y
23
Preface
What
follows
is
an attemptto
describe whatI
feel
about photography, aboutthe
act ofphotography
and aboutmy
photographs within
the
context of a graduatethesis.
Tech
nical
difficulties
precludethe
reproductionof all
the
thesis
photographs soI
choseto
use eight
that
I
felt
were most representativeof
the
fabric
ofthe
exhibit.When
I
referto
any
ofthese
eight photographsI
identify
them
specifically
by
title.
In
two
casesI
referto
photographsthat
are notin
this
report.
I
have
attemptedto
describe
those
photographs with enough
detail
to
makemy
11
Above
the
Tree
Line
An
Introduction
Above
the
tree
line,
wheremorning
frost
is
seldomdelicate,
life
is
sofragile
that
one misplacedstep
canleave
its
markforever.
The
press ofhumanity
onthe
environment
is
adelicate
andtricky
subjectto
deal
with.We
aretorn
by
many
problems, needs, wants,likes,
dislikes,
by
progress and
stagnation,
by
growth anddecay.
(When
the
subject
of environmentis
brought
up, wemay
see ourselves aspassengers on a
boat
whichhas
alimited
supply
of space andresources.)
And
we see ourselves asapproaching
saturation;
as
coming
dangerously
closeto
picking
up
that
proverbial"final
straw".So
, whatdo
wedo
aboutit?
How
do
wedeal
withit?
Where
do
we go?Within
each of usis
the
capacity
to
make a contribution
.The
magnitude ofthe
contributionis
of no consequence.
The
act ofcontributing
is
of utmostsignificance;
and
seeing
precedes action.For
anyone whohas
neverbeen
aboveit,
the
tree
line
is
an awesome experience
that
onedoes
notforget
eaaily-In
onemoment
remarkably
quiet,
gentle, crystalclear;
in the
nextdark,
windy,f
oreboding--a snow stormin
August.
The
tree
line
is
alinear
demarcation
that
outlines a geographicalpoint,
above which weather conditions are so
harsh
that
growthis
severely
limited.
It
is
a placethat
nature seemsto
have
ii
i
larger
context.It
is
a megascopic view of ourselves.Below
the
tree
line
aremy
photographs.They
are,individually,
partial statements,half
truths.
But
they
arestatements
taken
out of context,from
abook
that
has
yetto
be
completed.They
offer some evidencethat
the
eventswhich can
be
observed abovethe
tree
line
areoccurring
below.
My
concernis
ultimately
environmentalbut
my
photographs speak
less
of a shared,physical
environmentthan
it
does
a personal, philosophical one.The
photographs are an expression of a sense of awe
for
nature.They
are also a pursuit of whatI
see of ourselves withinthis
second nature ofthe
land.
I
wasstruggling
for
along
time
to
comeup
with a short,simple statement
to
describe
my
work whenI
came acrossthis
description ofCamille
Pisarro's
paintings:"...the
light
he
loved
best--a
gray
light,
part silver, part stone... often
1
melancholy. "1
77-IV
THESIS
PROPOSAL
TITLE:
A
SECOND
NATURE
SUBMITTED BY:
JOSEPH
SOLAN
THESIS
BOAED:
OWEN
BUTLER
ASSISTANT
PROFESSOR,
ROCHESTER
INSTITUTE
OF
TECHNOLOGY
KATHLEEN
COLLINS
ASSISTANT
PROFESSOR
ROCHESTER
INSTITUTE
OF
TECHNOLOGY
ROBERT
KOCH
DEAN,
UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE
UNIVERSITY
OF
ROCHESTER
SPECIAL
ADVISOR:
DAVID
HEATH
PROFESSOR
RYERSON
POLYTECHNIC
INSTITUTE
TORONTO,
CANADA
PURPOSE:
To
make photographiclandscapes,
as alteredby
man, and
to
explorethe
waysin
whichthe
naturaland
the
artificialinteract
visually
andemotionally.
SCOPE AND BACKGROUND
There
are certain alterationsthat
man makesto
his
environment
to
adaptit
to
his
needs.In
sodoing
he
juxtaposes
his
"artificial"environment with
the
natural,
and,
in
the
union ofthese
two
conditions,
he
introduces
alandscape
with a newquality,
a"second
nature".It
is
alandscape
in
a state of perpetualtension,
but
full
ofhumanity
and spirituality.For many
yearsI
have
notedthat
there
are somevery
particular places
to
whichI
amattracted,
but
was neverquite aware of
that
essentialfeature
whichdrew my
attention.I
have
cometo
realizethat
there
is
anintrinsic
quality
to
certain places which act as visual
keys
or catalyststo
my
memory
and experiencethat
callsfor
a response.The
response
is,
typically,
a photograph.All
of our senses are stimulatedin
muchthe
same way.When
welisten
to
music we are not movedby
the
sound of asimple
tone
but
by
the
placement of particulartones
nextto
each other.
In
muchthe
sameway,
when wesee,
we are movedby
particular combinations oflight,
shade,
color(tone)
andshape which
induces
an emotional statedrawn
from
experience.And,
in
the
musicalsense,
when eachtone
is
playedclearly
it
facilitates
understanding.I
intend
the
thesis
workto
be
akind
oflistening/seeing by
whichmy
emotions andexperiences can
be
clearly
expressed.In
sodoing
I
may
VI
PROCEDURE
I
amplanning
to
photographthrough
spring
and summerwith
the
thesis
show ofapproximately
3
printsin
early
fall.
The
placesI
willbe
photographing
willbe
both
urban and rural areas,
but
I
willbe
concentrating,
for
aperiod of
time,
in
a region ofthe
Catskill
Mts.
nearAlbany.
This
will provide me withthe
opportunity
to
experiencelong
periods of solitude(a
distraction-free
environment)
which will encourage
thoughtful
seeing/listening.I
willbe
working
with a4x5
viewcamera,
using
both
B&W
and colorfilms.
For
the
sake offlexibility
I
willAn
approachto
photographing
this
body
of work mighthave
been
to
imagine
simplethings
orideas
and set outto
find
or create
them
in
someorderly
way.To
do
so wouldhave
required me
to
rationalize some sort of symbol system or someparameters within which
to
work, andthen
stick withit.
I
might
have
comeup
with proceduresfor
filling
aframe,
ormarking
the
landscape,
orrecording
data.
I
couldhave
photographed
only
those
kinds
oflandscapes
that
fall
into
acategory
orlandscapes
that
have
been
acted uponin
avery
specific way.
Surely
this
wouldhave
madethe
photographseasier
to
understand.Until
nowI
neverfully
understoodthe
problem withthis
kind
ofthinking,
althoughI
have
alwaysfelt
that
there
wasa problem.
To
have
established a mechanism wouldhave
createda rigid personal work
habit
that
resistsfreedom
ofthought
and
freedom
of action.The
act ofphotographing
is
a selectionprocess
filtered
through
our ownthoughts
and experience.The
mechanism, which cannot
be
denied,
is
simply
an extension ofourselves and our
tools.
My
intention
wasto
make,in
this
thesis,
abody
of workthat
is
both
a reflection ofmy
relationship
withnature,
andan exploration of
that
characteristicthat
I
have
oftenrecognized
in
the
land
but
wasonly
aware of withoutphysically
two
objectivesseparately,
I
shoulddeal
withthat
whichis
familiar
to
us andhow
familiarity
breaks
down
our perception."Everyday
one grows mute withfamiliarity,
soknown
they
become
2
unknown. "Artists
have
a unique giftin
that
they
see andhear
things
that
the
ordinary
person,seemingly,
does
not perceive.Yet,
we all
look
atthe
samethings.
Anyone
whohas
observedyoung
childrenis
reminded ofthe
excitement atseeing
something
for
the
first
time.
It
is
akind
of excitementthat
is
very
similarto
what youfeel
when you make a photographthat
makes yousay,
"yes--that's
it."The
photographis
something
newa statementof recognition.
. . .no
individual
is
free
to
describe
nature with absoluteimpartiality
but
is
constrainedto
certain modes ofinterpretation
even whilehe
thinks
himself
mostfree.
I
took
advantage ofthe
opportunity
to
showmy
incomplete
thesis
photographsto
a person whose professionis
in
engineering,
and wholives
in
the
suburbs ofLong
Island
in
aneatly
maintained
low
ranch with acarefully
manicuredlawn
andshrubbery.
He
has
avery
strong
appreciationfor
the
artsbut
tends
to
be
analytical andmechanically
influenced
in his
ability
to
see.As
I
later
realized,he
also experiencesreality
2John
Fowles,
"Seeing
Nature
Whole",
Harper' s(November,
1979):
3
in
terms
ofthe
neatly
structured worldhe
has
createdfor
himself.
His
home,
his
personnally
createdenvironment,
forms
the
basis
ofhis
perception ofthe
rest ofthe
world.All
ofhis
judgments
arebased
on whathe
knows
abouthis
own personalenvironment, and what
he
knows
is
whathe
feels
most comfortable with.
The
most obvious photographs wereeasy
for
him
to
deal
with;
stoneretaining
wallholding
back
amuddy
yard, a steelbridge
crossing
a river gorge, a concrete section of afrozen
canal.
But
then
he
cameto
a photographthat
had
him
stumped.It
wastaken
in
a park and was a photograph of a small enclosedmeadow with a
perfectly
circularflower
patchin
the
center ofa
closely
cutfield
of grass and outlined withcarefully
placed
hedges.
It
looked
quite naturalto
him
because
in
his
own environment
there
is
no roomfor
random placement.He
simply
could not seeanything
artificial untilit
was pointedout
to
him.
* * *
We
cannot affordto
be
indiscriminant
andscientifically
selective.
Since
we experienceeverything
as a whole,in
context
withthe
rest ofthe
world, we cannotbecome
familiar
withany
onething
withoutlosing
the
perspective ofits
environment;
without considerable cost.The
motivationfor
high
4
understanding,
sciencetends
to
isolate
individual
objectsto
be
picked apart.We
become
sofamiliar
withisolated
objects
that
they
recedeinto
the
background.
In
ourdaily
routine we no
longer
see,hear
orfeel
things
the
way
they
were
first
experienced.John
Fowles
describes
this
"scientific"quest
for
understanding
nature asbeing
very
costly:The
particular cost ofunderstanding
the
mechanism ofnature,
ofhaving
sosuccessfully
itemized
and pigeonholedit,
is
in
his
ability
to
live
with and carefor
it
and notto
seeit
as enemy, challenge,defiance.
Selection
fromtotal
reality
is
noless
necessary
in
sciencethan
it
is
in
art;
but
outsidethose
domains
(in
both
of whichthe
final
test
of selectionis
utility
or yield,to
ourown species)
it
seriously
distorts
andlimits
any
worthwhile
relationship.^"
It
is
muchlike
the
route wetravel
to
work eachday.
Everyone
seesit
differently.But,
after somany
years oftravel
ing
'
the
same route,few
people candescribe
it
withvery
muchdetail
.Just
as poets choosefrom
common speech,the
visual artistc must choose
from
commonoccurrence.-^
Whether
it
is
seeing,
hear
ing,
touching
orany
combination of sense, we are observers ofour environment.
As
artists, wehave
the
opportunity
to
renderthings
as wepersonally
experiencethem.
The
rendering
is
anevolving
processby
whichthe
object and place we areseeing
is
tempered
by
what weknow
and allthat
wehave
experienced.That
Fowles,
"Seeing
Nature
Whole",
p.51
109-5
tempering is,
atthe
sametime,
both
intuitive
and evident.It
is
very
difficult
for
human
beings
to
detach
themselves
(their
consciousness)
in the
interest
ofobjectivity,
withoutthe
costly
loss
of ahuman
perception of ourlives.
Only
the
greatest scientists
have
been
ableto
maintain atruly
objectiveposture
in
their
exploration and still remainfully
aware oftheir
world,There
appearsto
be
abelief
among
photographersthat
every
thing
that
canbe
photographed,
has
been
done.
(That
Is
abit
like
saying
every
applethat
is
to
be
eatenhas
been)
.So
the
solution
is
to
invent
something,
use a gimmick, create atrend.
The
feeling
is
that
if
we plasticize our vision, orbuild
uncertainmodels of what we
think
wesee,
we will arrive at somekind
ofintellectual
nirvana(or
get rich).This
is
approaching
something
calleddecadence.
Thomas
Pynchon
describes
decadence
asthe
falling
away
from
whatis
human;
andthe
further
wefall
the
more wefoist
off ourlost
humanity
oninanimate
objectsand abstract
ideas.
Decadence
may be
awfully
strong
term,
but
as artists, we often
have
to
deal
with ourselves and our workin
very
drastic
ways,This
is
the
only
way
ofbreaking
away
the
barriers
to
clear and rational thought.6
What
wouldbe
the
resultif,
instead
ofregarding
the
author's
images
asliterary
conventions,
we wereto
examinethem
very
closely
ashighly
patterned reminder systems which released memories?. ..It
mustbe
rememberedthat
communications are onmany levels:
whatis
relevanton one
level
may
notbe
on another-?Since
its
inception,
the
photographhas
been
atool
ofremembrance.
Thirty
years afterDagguere
andNiepce,
Civil
War
soldiers carried
tintypes
oftheir
loved
ones;
wherebefore
ascarf, a
lock
ofhair
or a pressedflower
had
to
do.
Eighty
years
later,
afterthe
liberation
ofParis
from
the
Nazi
occupation,an
American
soldierfound
his
way
to
Picasso's
studio.He
askedPicasso
why
he
made such strange paintings.Picasso
repliedby.
asking
the
soldierif
he
had
a photograph ofhis
wife or girlfriend.
The
soldiertook
onefrom
his
wallet andhanded
it
to
him.
He
studiedit
awhile andfinally
said,"She
is
very
pretty
but
so small."Picasso's
work was anintegral
part ofhis
life
and
his
experience.It
was as much a vestige ofhis
life
aswas
that
soldier's snapshot.But
the
differences
in
the
levels
of communication are as
distinct
asthose
between
a musical noteand a symphony.
I
can'tsay
wherein
that
broad
spectrum of communicationmy
photographs canbe
placed.I
cansay
whatI
believe
to
be
the
difference
between
the
opposite ends.It
is
adifference
ofintention.
A
"snapshot"is
made as an aidin
remembering.The
act of
making
it
andthe
physical result are oflittle
consequence as
long
asthere
is
something.A
fine
work of artbecomes
aninstrument
of recognitionby
virtue ofits
performance.
It
becomes
adialogue
between the
artist andhis
audience.
* * *
There
have
been many false
starts atdescribing
the
kind
ofdialogue
I
hope
for my
photographsto
create.I
notedin my
thesis
proposalthat
I
have
known
for
yearsthat
there
areparticular places
to
whichI
am attracted.But
I
was never ableto
pindown
that
essentialfeature
that
caughtmy
attention.I
have
now cometo
understand atleast
two
aspects ofmy
in
terest
in
the
placesthat
I
photograph .The
first
is,
asthe
title
states,the
second nature ofthe
place.There
is
avery
essential conditionthat
becomes
a part of
the
land
when manimposes
his
structures.It
is
acondition
that
cannot exist withoutthe
interplay
ofthe
natural and
the
artificial.That
conditionis
made evidentby
the
remarkableadaptability
ofthe
natural andthe
stubborn
inflexibility
ofthe
man-made.The
effect onthe
land
as a whole
is
apparentdecay;
the
natural growsback
faith
fully
every
spring
but
the
man-madejust
crumbles.The
photograph
is
the
result of a sense of awe atthat
power of nature.a
feeling
(as
the
phenomenonis
oftendescribed)
but
arecog
nition of a
quality
in
the
land
that
reflects physical andemotional states
that
have
been
storeddeep
inside
of me.I
have
alwayshad
the
nagging
feeling
that
much of whatI
seeand
hear
is
sodeeply
storedaway
that
it
is
irretrievable.
It
is
like
adream
that
youknow
youhave
had
but
cannotrecall enough of
the
images
to
describe
it.
Then,
all of asudden,
I
amstanding
atthe
side of a road, orin
an alley,or under a
bridge,
or on afrozen
canal andthere
is
a sparkof recognition.
The
placebecomes
catalystto
memory, aThe
Use
ofColor
At
the
beginning
there
was no clear cut rationalefor
using
colorfilm
withblack
&
white, exceptthat
I
wantedto
see
how
wellI
worked whileswitching
from
oneto
the
other-It
seemsthat
working
this
way
has
been
regarded assomething
like
trying
to
change gears without a clutch.In
some casesit
is
regarded withdownright
contempt.I
have
never quiteunderstood
this
attitude.In
orderto
articulate anidea
perfectly, one mustclearly
define
every
element ofthe
photograph.There
are occasionswhen color
is
sotightly
bound
to
form
that
it
cannotbe
denied.
As
an artistI
assumethe
rightto
choosemy
palette.We
construct animage
oftones
that
play
against one anotherin
the
formation
of a unified statement.The
choices aresometimes
arbitrary
and sometimesvery methodical;
but
alwaysat
the
discretion ofthe
artist.The
resultis
a clear ex pression ofthe
statement."Color
in
itself
expressessomething."
--Van
Gogh
When
I
realizedI
washaving
nodifficulty
working
withcolor and
black
&
whitein
the
field,
I
expected a problem10
resolved
that
problem.I
wasvery
satisfied withthe
result.The
questionis
;why
did
it
work so well?I
think
there
are
two
reasons.The
first
and mostimportant
is
the
quality
of
the
light
I
usually
useto
photograph.The
kind
oflight
is
the
samein
both
color andblack
&
white whichhelps
to
unify
the
whole project.It
is
very
subdued("part
silver,part
stone"),
oftenlate
in
the
day,
sometimes overcast oreven rainy.
The
secondis
the
way
in
whichI
work with colorfilm.
Because
ofthe
light
I
often use, exposuretimes
mustbe
very
long.
I
do
notpay
very
much attentionto
Kodak's
limitations.
This
has
a peculiar effect onthe
film,
calling
for
strangefilter
combinations while printing.There
were alsomany
cases wherethis
use ofthe
film
backfired,
leaving
mewith several
boxes
of unprintable negatives.In
the
end,I
felt
It
was an essential part ofthe
body
ofwork.
Most
importantly,
it
made methink
more about whathappens
in
the
interim
between
exposing
the
negative andmaking
the
print.
With
black &
whitefilm
I
plan atthe
time
ofthe
exposure
how
the
photograph shouldlook.
Color
film
forces
meto
surrender some of
that
controlto
the
film
itself.
As
aKodak
ad might say,
"What
you seeis
what you get".However,
the
way
I
wasexposing
the
film
caused peculiar shiftsin
color sothat
different
kinds
of decisionshad
to
be
made while printing.
These
decisionslater
affectedthe
decisions
about11
Thesis
Sharing
Two
important
issues
were raised atthe
thesis
sharing
that
were never
really
resolved or answered.Now
that
I
have
had
time
to
think
aboutthem,
I
feel
that
I
cansay
more aboutthem.
The
first
is,
again,
the
issue
of color-But
the
questionthat
was asked was: what motivatedthe
choice of colorfilm
overblack
&
white?I
touched
onthis
in
the
preceding
section,
but
I
feel
it
would serve some purposeto
elaboratehere
in
orderto
deal
withhow
I
felt
aboutthe
thesis
sharing.When
the
question was asked
I
knew
I
had
notadequately
preparedfor
the
questionsthat
mightbe
raised atthe
sharing.I
believe
I
knew
allalong
what motivated me,but
the
answer wasjust
not
there.
The
reply
was a vague sketch of sometechnical
de
tails
that
wereoccurring
in
the
prints.A
thesis
board
membersuggested
that
the
motivation was moreintuitive
atthe
time
and rationalization came
later.
That
is
very
true,
but
by
that
time
I
shouldhave
had
the
rationalization.It
was notuntil
the
nextday (of
course!)that
the
answerbecame
clearin my
mind.It
lies
in
some ofthe
very
first
researchthat
I
started at
the
beginning
ofthe
thesis.
The
first
thing
I
wantedto
do,
sinceI
wasplanning
to
make photographic
landscapes,
wasto
look
up
the
etymology
of12
Dutch
word "lands
chap
".
It
breaks
down
into
"land",
whichmeans
the
samein
English,
and "-schap" or"-ship",
whichcomes
from
the
base
ofthe
word "scieppen"meaning
to
create,make.
When
the
suffix "-schap" or "-ship"is
addedto
a noun,it
forms
a nounmeaning
the
quality,
condition or state ofthat
objectdescribed
in
the
original word.So
I
intended
to
use color andblack
&
whitein
away
that
would mostaccurately
andclearly
delineate
that
quality
or condition ofthe
land,
andthat
state of mindinvolved
withbeing
part ofit.
The
dirt
road, withthe
half
melted snowexposing
muddy
red clay, shrouded
in
a greenishfog,
leaves
and stone glistening
from
the
heavy
mist, would neverhave
been
socool;
wouldnever
have
said so muchin
tones
of silver-I
used color as adescriptive
tool,
an abstract dimension of simple geometry.There
was some discussion asto
whetherthere
is
really
an
issue
ofthe
man-made andthe
natural, or some otherunique quality.
It
was suggestedthat
perhapsthe
landscapes
are
really
mind-made.That
may
be
a more accuratedescription
than
I
ever realized.The
coexistence ofthe
natural andthe
Q
artificial
has
become
"...soknown
(it
is)
unknown..."
;
it
is
the
first
nature ofthe
land.
The
second natureIs
the
resultof
the
introduction
of myself,my
own"mind-scapes"
into
the
land
Q
13
This
newtwist
does
not changethe
photograph.It
shedsnew
light
onthe
reasonsfor
the
pictures.I
believe
that
somehow
I
knew
aboutthat
aspect allalong
but
never cameto
terms
withit.
The
two
most potent examples ofthis
arein
this
report .
"The
Door"
was a photograph
that
I
had
carriedin my
mind
for
along
time
afterreading
H.G.
Wells'A
Door
in
the
Wall
It
just
turned
up
oneday
in
an alley.The
"Frozen
Canal
II"was
the
result of an assignmentto
make one photographthat
was
clearly
objective and onethat
wasclearly
subjective.The
result was
"Frozen
Canal
I"and
"Frozen
Canal
II".
At
the
time
I
did
notthink
it
was successful.(I
still don't--neither
oneis
clearly
objective.)
These
photographs representtwo
extremes;
the
real,the
land,
its
condition,its
first
nature--the
embodiment of an essentialquality
ofthat
coexistence ofthe
natural andthe
artificial.The
other extremeis
a senseof
mystery
aboutourselves;
abouthow
our world comestogether
and our place
in
it.
"The
Door" and "FrozenCanal
II",
all ofthe
photographs, reflectslightly
different aspects ofthe
mystery
andthe
reality
ofthe
landscape.
I
concludethat
alandscape
is
notentirely
real,it
is
aninterpolation
of14
Conclusion
Kenneth
Clark
oncedescribed
landscape
painting
as anexpression of
love.
I
seemy
photographs,
with somekind
ofemotion akin
to
love.
I
believe
all of us view our art workwith some sort of emotional
fever
(backdrop).
Even
nowI
don't
really
wantto
acknowledgeit
asthat
particular emotion.But
what needs
to
be
saidis
: whatI
amto
these
photographs andwhat are
these
photographsto
me.Autobiography
is
too
simplea
label
-it
doesn't
say
enough.The
foundations
ofmy
photography
is,
atleast
in
part,however,
autobiographical.There
is
acompelling
element ofthe
land
that
showsup
in
my
photographs which couldbe
traced
to
childhood recollections.The
rural nature ofmy
home
as a child provided me with ahaven;
places
to
be
alone.As
the
seventh childin
afamily
of eightchildren
it
wasvery
important
for
meto
be
alone.At
times
I
even
felt
closerto
these
placesthan
to
my
family-Over
aperiod of
time
a synthesistook
placein
whichI
could notdistinguish
myselffrom
the
land.
The
tree,
the
lake,
the
sky
all
became
my
other "family".As
I
grewup
I
witnessedthe
destruction
of allthese
placesby
populationgrowth.;
whatI
perceived as
decay
spreading
from
the
city.What
seemsto
have
happened
is
that
those
placesthat
were once real andtangible
are now
internalized
- mindscapes("inscapes",
according
to
15
Interestingly
the
most uncommon photographshave
occurredin
the
most common places.("The
Door"in
analley
behind
someindustrial
buildings;
"Stream"at a roadside where most people
would never
think
to
stop
-or even
look.)
When
I
find
andphotograph a place
like
this
something
oddtranspires.
I
seea
landscape
that
engulfs melike
an offshorebreeze
at a crowdedbeach.
If
I
closemy
eyesI
perceive no onebut
the
wind andthe
sea -I
am alone.
Likewise,
whenI
see, notjust
look,
but
whenI
really
seeI
am engulfed and no one elseis
there.
In
my
photographsI
rely
heavily
on extendedforegrounds
as a
"guide"
into
the
landscape.
Just
as when we arewalking
along
any
route, whatis
mostimmediately
important
is
that
whichis
mostdirectly
in
front
of us.Obviously
we must passthat
pointbefore
we can go anywhere else.But
how
we passit;
whattakes
place when we passit
caninfluence
our perception ofthe
rest of
the
journey.
In
"Stream",
for
instance
we arefirst
met
by
aforeground
that
is
quite ephemeral,transitory
astran
sitory
as a child's world,then
we are metby
something
very
much
the
opposite, stable and stationery; aformation
of stoneshaped
by
the
motion of water; accentedby
a cablethat
mimicsa
fallen
branch.Later
in
Frozen
Canal
II,
we are confrontedby
part of a concrete wall, cracked and chipped-a
jumping
off place
to
something
eternallike
the
universe.16
response
to
a concernis
action.In
my
casethe
actionis
aphotograph.
Gerard
Manley
Hopkins
wouldtell
usthat
it
is
activity
that
revealssomething
of ourselves.Hopkins
alsoheld
that
it
is
in
activity,
in
characteristicaction,
that
the
individual
revealshis
inscape,
andhe
delights
in
dynamism:
As
kingfishers
catchfire,
dragonflies
.draw
flame;
As
tumbled
over rimin
roundy
wellsStones
ring;
like
eachtucked
string
tells,
eachhung
bell's
Bow
swung
finds
tongue
to
fling
outbroad
its
name;
Each
mortalthing
does
onething
andthe
same:Deals
outthat
being
indoors
each onedwells;
Selves
goesitself;
myselfit
speaks andspells;
Crying
What
I
do
is
me:for
that
I
came.9
9
John
Pick,
A
Hopkins
Reader
(New
York:
Oxford
University
THE
DOOR
Rochester,
N.Y.
"Our
business
is
to
seewhat we can and render it."
OLANA
NEAR
SCHOEN
PLACE
GENESEE
CROSSING
UNDER
THE
RIP
VAN
WINKLE
BRIDGE
STREAM
FROZEN CANAL
I
Bushnell
'FROZEN
CANAL
II
Bushnell
's
Basin,
N.Y.
"The
mystery
ofthe
universeis
that
It
is
comprehensible."25
I
prizein
seeing
a greatdeal.
In
the
visualimage
we possesslife.
We
speaktoo
much,
we shouldspeak
less
anddraw
more.As
for
myself,
I
shouldlike
to
renouncethe
word, and speakonly
in
images,
as
does
plastic nature.This
fig
tree,
this
snake,
this
cocoon exposedto
the
sunin
front
ofthis
window,all
these
things
are secretsigns;
andthose
who could
decipher
their
true
meaning'could
do
withoutany
spoken or writtenlanguage
in
the
future
--There
is
in
the
wordsomething
sofutile,
so pointless,
I
am almosttempted
to
say,so ridiculous . . .
26
Afterward
I
believe
I
accomplished whatI
set outto
do:
to
explore,
in
photographiclandscapes,
the
waysIn
which
the
natural andthe
artificialinteract
visually
and emotionally.
However,
there
is
still moreto
do.
It
is
an open ended exploration.At
the
end of ajourney
like
this,
what matters, after all,is
the
experience ofgetting
there.
"Searching
is
everything."27
Technical
Considerations
Film
(4x5)
Developer:
Papers:
Developer:
Camera:
Lens
:Tri-X
VPS
Vericolor
VPL
Vericolor
FG-7
Developed
by
inspection
C-4l
,Machine
processedPolycontrast
F
(thesis
show)Polycontrast
A
(thesis
report)Ektacolor
74
N
Wynn
Bullock's
Amidol
Formula
water -f gal sodium sulfite
-3
tbsp.Amidol
-2
tsp.
potassium
bromide
(10fo
sol.) -lOcc
BB
solution(anti-fog)
-lOcc
citric acid
-i
tsp.To
make a10$
solutiondissolve10
grams
in
900cc
of water, add waterto
make lOOOcc.
Color
paper machine processedTachihara
4x5
Goerz Dagor 6i"
28
GLOSSARY
emotion n. a)
strong
feeling;
excitementb)
the
state orcapability
oxhaving
the
feelings
arousedto
the
point of awarenesslandscape
n.(17th
c. artborrowing
from
the
Dutch lanschap:
land=land
and -schap=-ship.)
1.
a picturerepresenting
a section ofnatural,
inland
scenery,
as ofprairie,
woodland,
mountains etc.2.
the
branch
of painting,photography
etc.dealing
withsuch pictures
3.
the
expanse of naturalscenery
seenby
the
eyein
one view*4.
animage
that
showsthe
quality
, condition or stateof
the
land
in
context of city,country
or seanature n.
the
essential character of athing
,quality
orqualities
that
makesomething
whatit
is;
essenceOlana
n.(from
the
arabic wordmeaning
home
place)The
home
of
Frederick
Church
ofthe
Hudson
River
School
ofPainters
The
house
was constructed on ahill
overlooking
the
Hudson
River.
The
hill
wascompletely
"landscaped"
in
such away
that
whenChurch
looked
out of ahuge
windowin
his
living
roomthe
view wasin
perfectbalance
andharmony
like
his
paintings
-ship
(ME.
-schippe;AS. -scip,from
base
of scieppen,to
create,
make)a suffix added
to
nounsto
form
nounsmeaning
the
quality,condition or state of
29
Bibliography
Bullock,
Wynn.
Wynn
Bullock,
text
by
David
Fuess.
Millerton,
N.Y.
:Aperture,
1976.
Eurke,
Kenneth.Language
asSymbolic
Action.
Repr.
of1966
ed.Berkeley:
University
ofCalifornia
Press,
1968.
Clark,
Kenneth.Landscape
Into
Art.
New York:
Harper
&
Row,
1979-Eliade,
Mircea.
The
Sacred
andthe
Profane,
trans,
by
Willard
R.
Trask.
New York:
Harcourt
Brace,
1959-Fowles,
John.
"Seeing
Nature
Whole",
Harper's
(November
1979).
Hall,,
Edward
T.
The
Hidden
Dimension.Garden
City,
N.Y.:
Doubleday
andCo.,
1966.
Hume/Mancester/Metz.
The
Great West
Real/ideal.Boulder,Col.:
University
ofColorado,
1977-McLuhan,
T.C.
Touchthe
Earth.New York:
Simon
&
Schuster,
1972.
Meyerowitz,
Joel.
Cape
Light.Boston:
New York
GraphicSosiety,
1978.
Michell,
John.
The
View
Over
Atlantis.New York:
BallantineBooks,
1969.
Pick,
John.
A
Hopkins
Reader-New
York: OxfordUniversity
Press,
1953-Pynchon,
Thomas. Gravity's Rainbow.New York:
Viking
Press,
1973-Sheeler,
Charles. CJiarle^Sheeler. textby
MartinFriedman.
New
York:
Watson-Guptill,1975-Stevens,
Mark. "Pisarrothe
Patriarch", Newsweek(June
1,
1981)
Taylor,
Joshua
C.
To_iieJLJ1s_to^^
Washington,
D. C.
:Smithsonianiy^-30
Turabian,
Kate
L.
A
Manual
for Writers
ofTerm
Papers,
Theses
and
Dissertations,
4th
ed.Chicago:
The
University
ofChicago
Press,
1973
Webster's
New World
Dictionary,
2nd
ed.New York:
William
Collins +
World
Publishing
Co.,
1974.
Wells,
H.G.
The
Door
in
the
Wall
andOther
Stories.
Boston:
David
R.
Godine,