ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Ecological
Modelling
j o u r n al ho me p ag e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / e c o l m o d e l
Modelling
the
effects
of
fishing
on
the
North
Sea
fish
community
size
composition
Douglas
C.
Speirs
a,∗,
Simon
P.R.
Greenstreet
b,
Michael
R.
Heath
aaDepartmentofMathematicsandStatistics,UniversityofStrathclyde,GlasgowG11XH,UK
bMarineScotlandScience,MarineLaboratory,POBox101,375VictoriaRoad,AberdeenAB119DB,UK
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received18March2015
Receivedinrevisedform23October2015 Accepted27October2015
Keywords:
Length-structuredpopulationmodel Multi-speciesmodel
NorthSea Fisheries
Ecosystem-basedmanagement Largefishindicator(LFI)
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Ecosystem-basedmanagementoftheNorthSeademersalfishcommunityusesthelargefishindicator
(LFI),definedastheproportionbyweightoffishcaughtintheInternationalBottomTrawlSurvey(IBTS)
exceedingalengthof40cm.CurrentvaluesoftheLFIare∼0.15,buttheEuropeanUnion(EU)Marine
StrategyFrameworkDirective(MSFD)requiresavalueof0.3bereachedby2020.AnLFIcalculatedfrom
aneight-speciessubsetcorrelatedcloselywiththefullcommunityLFI,therebypermittinganexploration
oftheeffectsofvariousfishingscenariosonprojectedvaluesoftheLFIusinganextensionofapreviously
publishedmulti-specieslength-structuredmodelthatincludedthesekeyspecies.Themodelreplicated
historicalchangesinbiomassandsizecompositionofindividualspecies,andgeneratedanLFIthatwas
significantlycorrelatedwithobservations.Acommunity-widereductioninfishingmortalityof∼60%
from2008valueswasnecessarytomeettheLFItarget,drivenmainlybychangesincodandsaithe.A70%
reductionincodfishingmortalityalone,ora75%reductioninottertrawleffort,wasalsosufficientto
achievethetarget.Reductionsinfishingmortalitynecessarytoachievemaximumsustainableharvesting
ratesareprojectedtoresultintheLFIover-shootingitstarget.
©2015TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
1. Introduction
Manystudiesofexploitedfishcommunitieshavedemonstrated shiftstowardssmallersizedfish,relatedtoincreasedfishing(Daan
etal.,2005;Shinetal.,2005;GreenstreetandRogers,2006;Heath
andSpeirs,2012),whilstanincreaseinthemeansizeoffishinside
marinereservesisoneofthemostfrequentlyobservedresponses following the cessation of fishing (Molloyet al., 2009). Conse-quently,thelargefishindicator(LFI),definedastheproportionby weightofdemersalfish>40cmsampledduringthequarter1 Inter-nationalBottomTrawlSurvey(Q1IBTS)(Greenstreetetal.,2011), hasbeenadoptedasanOSPAREcologicalQualityObjective(EcoQO) fortheNorthSeafishcommunity(HeslenfeldandEnserink,2008) andistheprincipalstatusassessmenttoolforimplementingan ecosystemapproachtofisheriesmanagementinEurope.TheLFI hasalsobeenadoptedasanindicatortosupportimplementation
Abbreviations:LFI,largefishindicator;IBTS,internationalbottomtrawlsurvey; EU,EuropeanUnion;MFSD,marinestrategyframeworkdirective;OSPAR,Oslo-Paris conventionfortheprotectionofthemarineenvironmentoftheNorth-EastAtlantic; EcoQO,ecologicalqualityobjective;PDMM,populationdynamicalmatchingmodel; FCSRM,fishcommunitysize-resolvedmodel;ICES,InternationalCouncilforthe ExplorationoftheSeas;TSB,totalstockbiomass.
∗Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+4401415483813;fax:+4401415483345. E-mailaddress:[email protected](D.C.Speirs).
oftheMarineStrategyFrameworkDirective(MSFD),andis iden-tifiedinthe2010decisiondocumentasanindicatortomonitor changeintheproportionoftoppredatorsinfishcomponentsof marinefoodwebs(EuropeanCommission,2010).Itmayalsofulfil thefunctionofindicator1.7.1,monitoringchangeintherelative abundanceof ecosystemcomponents,inthis instancelargeand smallfish(Modicaetal.,2014).
ThesimplicityoftheLFIbeliescomplexprocessesthatcan influ-enceitsvalue.Asaratioindicator,changestowardslowvaluescan becausedbyincreasedsmallfishabundanceaswellasbythe deple-tionoflargefish(Daan etal.,2005).Predator–preyinteractions mayaffecttheLFI,forexampleanincreaseinsmallfishabundance mightarisefromreleaseofpredationpressure,aslargerpiscivorous fishareremoved(Christensenetal.,2003;MyersandWorm,2003:
Franketal.,2005;Heithausetal.,2008).Inaddition,the
commu-nityoffishcomprisesspeciesofwidelyvaryingmaximumsizes, soshiftsincommunitycompositiontowardsspecieswithlower maximumsize(e.g.inresponsetowarmingtemperatures)could alsocauseLFIvaluestodecline(Shephardetal.,2012;Beareetal.,
2004;Simpsonetal.,2011).So,useoftheLFIinassessing
ecosys-temstatusandachievingparticulargoalsforthestateofthesystem requiresaclearunderstandingofwhathasdrivenchangesinthe LFIinthepastinordertopredictitsresponseinthefuture.
Intheearly1980stheNorthSeaLFIhadavalueof≈0.3,before decliningto<0.1intheearly2000s,followedbysomerecovery
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.032
insubsequentyears(Fungetal.,2012;Greenstreetetal.,2012a).
Greenstreet etal. (2011) conducteda statistical analysisof the
NorthSeaLFItimeseriesand,concludedthattherewasa12–18 yearlagintherelationshipbetweenchangingdemersalfish har-vestingrates and theindicatorresponse.Subsequentstudies in differentmarineregionshavedemonstratedsimilarlagged rela-tionshipsbetweenfishingmortalityandtheLFI(Shephardetal., 2011).Anumber ofsize-structuredmodelsoffishcommunities showtheanticipated inverserelationshipbetweenfishing mor-talityandindicesoffishsize(Halletal.,2006;Popeetal.,2006;
Blanchardetal.,2009;Rochetetal.,2011;Blanchardetal.,2014;
Thorpeetal.,2015).
In understanding how the LFI has responded to historical changesinfishingpressure,andhowitmightrespondtofuture managementdecisions,size-structuredmodelsareclearly impor-tanttools.However,thecomplexityofthefactorsaffectingtheLFI, includingmultispeciespredator–preyinteractions,hasmeantthat attemptsatmodellingithavethusfarbeenfairlyfew.Shephard
etal. (2012) studiedchanges in theLFI in theCeltic Seausing
twodifferentmodellingapproaches.The firstwasbased onthe Population-Dynamical Matching Model developed by Rossberg
etal.(2008),whichusesaquasi-evolutionaryprocessand
allomet-ricscalingstogeneratesize-structuredcommunitiesofcomposed ofspeciesof varyingbodysize.The secondusedtheFish Com-munitySize-Resolved Model(FCSRM)ofmodel ofHartvigetal.
(2011)thatinvolvescoupledsize-spectratorepresentthesize
dis-tributionsofgroupsofspecieswithsimilarmaturationsizes.The modelsarecontrastinginthatthePDMMproduceschangesinthe LFIonlythrough shiftsinrelative speciesabundance, whilethe FCSRMcandosoasaresultofchangesinthepopulationlength dis-tributionsofgroupsofspecies.Itwasconcludedthatthechanges intheCelticSeaLFIarosemainlythroughchangesinspecies abun-dance.Fungetal.(2013)alsousedthePDMMmodelconfigured fortheNortheastAtlanticandpredictedmulti-decadalrecovery timesinresponse toreductionsincommunity fishingpressure. Mostrecently,Blanchardetal.(2014)usedavariantoftheFCSRM whereindividualsize-spectrarepresented12individualNorthSea speciesratherthanspeciesgroupsandfound,bycontrast,thata rapidrecoveryintheLFIcouldoccurwhenthefishingmortality onthevariousspecieswasmovedtomaximumsustainableyield (MSY)levels.
Here,weapplyanalternativediscrete-timemultispecies length-structuredmodelfortheNorthSeafishcommunitydevelopedby
Speirsetal.(2010)tomodeltheobservedchangesintheLFI,and
thenuseittoexplorewhatmayhappeninthefutureunder alter-nativescenariosoffishingfleetactivityandrecruitmentpatternsof keyspecies.Oneofthefeaturesofthemodelisthatpredator–prey interactions are specified in terms of body length ratios appli-cableacrossallspecies,thereby reducingtheneedfor complex dietaryparameterisation.Themodelalsoincludesthekey com-merciallyexploitedpelagicandinvertebratespeciesintheNorth Sea,enablingthetrade-offsrequiredtorestorethedemersalLFI toa givenstatetobeexplored.AswithBlanchardetal.(2014)
individualspeciesareexplicitlyrepresented,buttheSpeirsetal.
(2010)modeldifferssubstantiallyinnumericalimplementationas
wellasanumberofotherkeyrespects,includingthatwemodel individuallengthratherthanweight,andthatwerepresent repro-ductionasspecies-specificseasonalfunctionofthespawningstock ratherthanhavingrecruitmentasanannualexternaldriver.Since boththerevisedCommonFisheriesPolicyandtheMSFDrequire fisheriestooperateatMSY,weaddressthequestionofwhether achievingthisissufficienttoreachtheLFItargetsforNorthSeafish. Incontrasttoearliermodellingwork,wealsoconsidertheextentto whichtheLFItargetmightbeachievedbychangesineffortof dif-ferentfishingfleetsratherthanchangingoverallfishingmortality, orspecies-specificmortalities.
2. Methods
2.1. Thedata
TheNorthSeaFirstQuarter (Q1)InternationalBottomTrawl Survey(IBTS)isanannualsurveywithwidespatialcoverage.Fish caughtareidentifiedtospecies,andnumbersatlength,aswellas ageandsexualmaturitydatafromsubsamplesofselectedspecies, arerecorded(ICES,2010).Thedataarepubliclyavailablefromthe ICESDATRASdatabaseportal(http://datras.ices.dk).Individualfish weightsareobtainedfromstandardcubic-powerweight-at-length relationships(Greenstreetetal.,2012b),whichwhenappliedtothe surveydataallowedthecalculationoftheLFI.
2.2. Themodel
WeusedtheSpeirsetal.(2010)discrete-timelength-structured
modeloftheNorthSeafishcommunity.Themodeldescribesafood webcomposedofasetofkeypredatorandpreyspeciestogether withasmallnumberofmorecrudelyrepresentedalternativefood sources.Fortheexplicitlyrepresentedspeciesthenumber,ni,j,t,of
individualsofspeciesiinlengthclassjattimetisupdatedover timesteptaccordingto
ni,j,t+t=
(1−pi)i,j,tni,j,t+hi,t j=0
(1−pi)i,j,tni,j,t+pii,j−1,tni,j−1,t j>1
where 0<pi<1is a constant fractionofindividuals progressing
fromonelengthclasstothenextovertheintervalt→t+t,and
i,j,tandhi,tare,respectively,thecorrespondingsurvivorshipand
hatchlings tothefirstlengthclass. Thelength ofindividuals of lengthclassjisgivenby
Li,j=L∞,i−
L∞,i−L0,i
exp (−j×qi)
whereL0,iisthelengthofthesmallestlengthclass,L∞,iisthe
asymp-toticlengthofspeciesi,andqiisaconstant.Inordertomodel
growthuptoamaximumlengthLmax,i(necessarilylessthanL∞,i)
usingjmax,ilengthclassesweset
qi=−ln
L∞,i−Lmax,i
L∞,i−L0,i
/jmax,iAsshowninSpeirsetal.(2010),inourmodelthemeanlength, ˆ
Li,t,ofacohortofindividualswithlengthL0,iatt=0willincrease
withgrowthrateiaccordingtoavonBertalanffyfunction
ˆ
Li,t=L∞,i−
L∞,i−L0,ie−itprovidedthatpi=it/qiandpi∈(0,1).So,iftheparameters
L0,i,L∞,i,andiareknownfromobservationswecanchoseany
jmax,i(andhenceqi)andtthatsatisfytheserequirementsand
gettherequiredvonBertalanffygrowth.Althoughthechoicedoes notimpactonthemeancohortlength,itdoescontrolthevariability aroundthatmean.Increasingqiordecreasingtwillhavethe
effectofincreasingthevariabilityinlengthofacohort.Biomass featuresinthecalculationofthesurvivalandrecruitmentterms, describedbelow,soweassumethatweightandlengtharerelated bywi,j=aiLbi
j ,withaiandbiconstants.
Therecruitmentterm,hi,t,isthenumberofeggshatchedfroma
distincteggclass,ne,i,t.Weassumethattheproportionofsexually
matureindividualsproducingeggsincreaseswithlengthaccording toacumulativenormaldistribution.So,theproportionofmature adults,mi,j,inlengthclassjisgivenby
mi,j=
(Li,j−Lm,i)/sm,i
where(•) isthecumulativedistributionfunctionofthestandard normaldistribution,andthemeanandstandarddeviationoflength atmaturityareLm,iandsm,i,respectively.Overtheintervalt→t
therate,εi,t,atwhicheggsareproducedandenteraneggclass,
dependsonthetotalmaturebiomassandthetimeofyear.If spawn-ingoccursbetweendays-of-the-yeard0,iandd1,i,thenmeasuring
timeindaysanddefiningtheday-of-the-yearina365-dayyearat timetasd=t−trunc
t/365×365,wegetεi,t=
⎧
⎪
⎨
⎪
⎩
i2
d1,i−d0,ij
max,ij=0
mi,jni,j,twi,j if d0,i<d<d1,i
0 otherwise
whereiistheannualnumberofeggsproducedperunitfemale
bodymass,andthefactorof1/2assumesanequalsexratio.Ifthe averageeggdevelopmenttimeis e,iandeggssufferapercapita
backgroundmortalitye,i,andaconstantlossratefrompredation
Ue,i,t/t,thentheupdaterulefortheeggclassandhatchlingsare
respectively
ne,i,t+t=
εi,t−Ue,i,t/t
i +
ne,i,t−εi,t−Ue,i,t/t
i
e−ithi,t+t=
p 2 i,t
ne,i,t+ne,i,t−i,t
(1−e−i,tt)
wherei=e,i+1/ e,i.Thetimestepuptakeofeggsdueto
preda-tion,Ue,i,t,iscalculated inthesamewayasthepredationonall
populationlengthclasses,asdescribedbelow.Sincethisdepends onlength,weassumethelengthofaneggisapproximatedbythe equivalentsphericaldiameterofahatchlingofmasswi,0=aiLb0i,i
assumingneutralbuoyancy.
Thesurvivorshipofthepopulationlengthclasses,i,j,t,canbe
furtherbrokendown
i,j,t=i,j,tp × b i,j,t×
F i,j,t
wherei,j,tp isthesurvivorshipfrompredationbymodelledspecies,
b
i,j,tisthesurvivorshipfromadditionalbiomass-dependent
mor-tality,and F
i,j,t thesurvivorshipfromfishing.Survivorshipfrom
fishingissimplye−Fi,j,tt whereFi,j,t isthefishingmortalityrate perunit time onlengthclass jofspecies iattime t.The catch overeachtimestepofagivenspeciesandlengthclassistherefore
1−F i,j,t
ni,j,t.Sincenotallthecatcharenecessarilyretained,
wealsodefineaneffectiveminimumlandingsizeLl,i,suchthatthe
landedcatch,orlandings,isthetotalcatchforspeciesiof individ-ualsoflengthLl,iorabove.
Thebiomass-dependentsurvivorshiptakesthesameformfor allindividuals,butwedistinguishsmallindividuals(fordemersal fishthesearetheplanktonicindividualsbeforesettlement)from largerones.IfthistransitionoccursatlengthLs,iwehave
bi,j,t=
e−(p,i+ıp,iWp,i,t)t L i,j<Ls,i
e−(s,i+ıs,iWs,i,t)t otherwise
whereWp,i,t= j
s,i−1j=1
wini,tandWs,i,t= jmax
j=js,i
wini,taretherespective
biomassesofsmallandlargeindividuals,withjs,ithefirstlength
classwhereLj≥Ls,i.
Inordertocalculatei,j,tp webeginbynotingthatallsurviving individualsmusthavemettheirmetabolic,growth,and reproduc-tivecosts.Thismeansthat,if˛iistheassimilationefficiency,the
biomassoffood(inbiomassunits)consumedover t→t+tfor eachlengthclassis
Ci,j,t=
i,j,tni,j,t
Mi,j+piGi,j+Ri,j,t
˛i
.
where Mi,j,piGi,j,andRi,j,t arethepercapitametabolic,growth,
andreproductivecostsinbiomassunits.Themetaboliccostsare proportionaltobodymass
Mi,j=iwi,jt,
thegrowthcostisthedifferenceinweight
Gi,j=wi,j+1−wi,j
andappliestothefraction,pi,ofindividualsgrowingfromoneclass
tothenext.Thereproductivecostistheweightofeggsproduced overthetimestepistherefore
Ri,j,t=
si,timiwi,0t
2 .
Thefractionofthetotalfoodconsumptionbypredatorclass
i,j
thatcomesfrompreyclassi,jistheweightedproportion ofthetotalpreybiomassi,j,i,j,t=
i,j,i,j ni,j,t wi,j
all iall j i,j,i,j ni,j,t wi,j
wheretheweighting, i,j,i,j,isthepreferenceof
i,j
fori,janddescribedbelow.Thisimpliesthatthetotalconsumption(in unitsofdensity,gm–2)onpreyclass
i,jbyallpredatorsisUi,j,t=
all i
all j
Ci,j,ti,j,i,j,t
andhencethatthefractionsurvivingpredationis
ip,j,t=1−wUi,j,t ijni,j,t
Notethattheaboveequationdependsonthesurvivorshipof thepredators,whichmeansthatweneedtodefineaprocessing order.Wemakethesimplificationthatonlysurvivingindividuals gettofeed,andsinceinoursystempredatorsarealwayslargerthan theirpreywecanorderthecalculationofthepredationmortality ratesaccordingly.Sothelargestlengthclasscanneverbeeatenby anyotherclass,butcanpredatesmallerclasses.Havingcalculated thecontributiontothepredationofallofitsprey,thenext-largest lengthclassdown(whichmaybeadifferentspecies)canbedealt withsinceitsmortalityrateisnowknown,andsoonindescending orderoflength.
Weassumethatthepreferencearisesfromaspecies-dependent termzi,i,whichiszeroifapreyspeciesisnoteatenandlargewhen
apreyspeciesishighlypreferred,andafunction,f
l/Li,j,ofthe prey/predatorlengthratio
i,j,i,j =
zi,i
li,j +1
li,j
f
l/Li,jdl
all i
all jzi,ili,j +1
li,jf
l/l i,jdl .
Thefunctionf
l/Li,jpeaksatapreferredprey/predatorlength ratioRopt,i,andiszerooutsidearangeofratiosfromRmin,itoRmax,i
f
l/Li,j = gl/Li,j ˛i−11−g
l/Li,j ˇi−1Rmin,i<l/Li,j<Rmax,i
where
g
l/Li,j= l/Li,j−Rmin,i
Rmax,i−Rmin,i
˛i =1+
ˇi−1Ropt,i−Rmin,i
Rmax,i−Rmin,i
Theparameterˇi setshowtightlythepreference functionis
distributedaboutRopt,i.
Forthreepreytypesnotexplicitly representedona species-by-speciesbasis(zooplankton,benthos,and‘otherfish’)wemodel thesebysimplebiomassspectrapartitionedintolengthclassesof equalwidthonalogarithmicscale.Thelengthofthelower bound-aryofclassjofpreytypeiis
Li,j=L0,i
Lmax,iL0,i
(i/jmax,i)whereL0,i andLmax,iarethesmallestandlargestlengths
repre-sentedfortypei,andjmax,iisthenumberoflengthclassesused
torepresentthebiomassspectrum.Weassumethatforeachprey class
i,jthebiomass,Bi,j,t,followssimplechemostatdynamicsBi,j,t+t=
Ki−Ui,j,t
Pit
(1−e−Pi,j=t)+B
i,j,te−Pi,j=t
where Ki is thesteady state biomass without predation, Pi,j is
theproductiontobiomassratio,andUi,j,t/tisrateatwhichthe
preylengthclassis beingconsumedby theexplicitlymodelled predators.Givenan estimateof atotal unexploitedbiomass,Ti,
togetherwiththestandardresultofbiomassspectrumtheoryof equalbiomassinlogarithmiclengthclasses,wesetKi=Ti/jmax,i.As
withtheexplicitlymodelledspecies,eachlengthclasshasan asso-ciatedcharacteristicmassforindividualorganismsinthatlength class,wi,j=aiLi,jbi,andtheproductiontobiomassratioscales
loga-rithmicallywithbodymass log10
Pi,j=k1,ilog10
wi,j
+k2,i.The model was configured for eight demersal species that accountedfor >90%ofthetotal demersalbiomass intheNorth Sea(cod,haddock,whiting,saithe,Norwaypout,plaice,common dab,andgreygurnard),plustwopelagicspecies(herring,sandeel) andNephropsnorvegicus(henceforthNephrops).Theadditionalfood resourcesnotmodelledatthespecieslevelwerezooplankton, ben-thos,and‘otherfish’.Outputsfromthemodelweretimeseriesof totalspeciesbiomass(TSB),normalisedlengthdistributions(the sumofeachspeciesdistributionequalsone)atannualcensusdates, annualrecruitment,catchandlandings,foreachspecies.By apply-inglogisticsurveycatchability-at-lengthfunctionstotheTSBand lengthdistributions,wederivedamodelestimateoftheLFI(from theeightdemersalspecies).Asummaryoftheparametersusedto modelthelength-structuredspeciesisprovidedinTable1,while
Table2containsthecorrespondingparametervaluesforeachofthe
11explicitly-modelledspecies.Table3givesthesize-independent preference weightings used in calculating distributing thefood uptakebypredatorsamong possibleprey.Finally, Table4 gives theparametersusedtomodelthevariousbiomassspectraused torepresentalternativefoodresources.
2.3. Baselinerun
We first carried out a baseline model run for the period 1960–2008.FishingmortalitiesreportedbyICESwereusedwhere possible(ICES,2009aforherring, andICES,2009bforcod, had-dock, whiting, saithe, Norway poutand sandeel). These fishing mortalitiesarereportedasmortality-at-age,andwereconvertedto
Table1
Briefdescriptions,symbols,andunits,fortheparametersusedtomodelthe explic-itlyrepresentedspecies.SeeTable2fortheparametervaluesusedforeachspecies.
Description Symbol Units
Numberoflengthclasses jmax –
Eggdevelopmenttime e Days
Hatchlinglength L0 cm
Settlementlength Ls cm
Meanmaturationlength Lm cm
Standarddeviationofmaturationlength sm cm
Maximummodelledlength Lmax cm
Asymptoticlength L∞ cm
Growthrate Year−1
Fecundity Eggsg−1
Spawningstartdate d0 Dayofyear
Spawningenddate d1 Dayofyear
Effectivelandingsize Ll cm
Density-independentmortalityrates
Egg e Day−1
Pre-settlement p Day−1
Post-settlement s Day−1
Biomass-dependent(density-dependent)mortality
Pre-settlement ıp g−1m2Day−1
Post-settlement ıs g−1m2Day−1
Assimilationefficiency ˛ –
Metaboliccost Day−1
Weight-at-lengthconstant a gcm−b
Weight-at-lengthpower b –
Preferredprey/predatorlengthratio Ropt – Minimumprey/predatorlengthratio Rmin –
Maximumprey/predatorratio Rmax –
Predatorpreferencefunctionwidth ˇ –
mortalities-at-lengthbyinvertingthevonBertalanffyage–length relationshipforeachspeciesinordertoobtainanapproximateage,
ai,j,oflengthclassLi,j
ai,j=trunc
–ln
L∞,i−Li,j L∞,i−L0,i
whichallowsustouseICESstockassessmentsforThisallowsusto useWecanthusgetalength-dependentFfromtheage-classF’s
Fj,t≈Faj,t
andsothesurvivalfromfishingis
F
j,t=e−Fj,tt/365
wherethedivisionby365isnecessaryiftisindays,andtheF’s areannualrates.Stockassessmentsstartedindifferentyearsfor thevariousspecies,soforyearsinourmodelrunpre-datingthe startofassessmentwegeneratedapproximatefishingmortalities byestimatingalinearscalingbetweenfishingmortalityandofficial recordedlandings(http://www.ices.dk/marine-data/)and assum-ingthatthelength-dependenceofthefishingmortalitywasthe sameasthatofthefirstassessedyear.Thisisclearlyrestrictive,but isatolerableassumptionwheneitherthestocklightlyexploited, orwhenlandingsarerelativelyconstant, andonlyaffects years priortotheLFIperiod.For theremainingfishspecies(common daband greygurnard)we approximatedthefishingmortalities fromtheharvestratio,i.e.theratiooflandingstototalbiomass estimatedfromtheIBTS,witha length-dependencetakenfrom the(single year) estimateoffishingmortality forthose species (Popeetal.,2000).WeestimatedNephropsfishingmortalityusing thelandingsandastockbiomassestimateobtainedbyscalingup fromburrowdensitiesobtainedfromunderwatertelevision
sur-veys(Speirsetal.,2010).From2002onwards,larvalsurvivorship
ofbothherringandsandeelswaslowerthanexpected(ICES,2009a,
2009b),probablyasaresultofchangingenvironmentalconditions
[image:4.646.39.193.68.121.2] [image:4.646.300.552.82.359.2]Table2
Species-specificparametervaluesfortheexplicitlyrepresentedspecies.SeeTable1forparameterdefinitionsandunits.
Parameter Cod Haddock Whiting Norwaypout Herring Sandeel Commondab Greygurnard Nephrops Saithe Plaice
jmax 140 70 65 65 80 40 45 90 50 70 60
e 11 15 15 1.5 7 90 7 7 1 10 24
L0 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.25 0.35 0.7 0.35 0.062
5
Ls 7 5 5 1 6 5 1 5 1 6.5 1
Lm 60 25 20 13.7 0.22 14 24.5 29 9 55 32
sm 2 3 2 2 1.5 1.5 2 1 1 8 3
Lmax 111 58.5 40.9 18.3 29.7 19 38 42.8 18 71 43
L∞ 123 65 43 18.5 30 20 40 45 20 80 45
0.164 0.292 0.402 0.986 0.529 0.87 0.584 0.291 0.16 0.3 0.35
500 500 880 980 400 780 1000 3000 100 750 265
d0 90 75 1 60 330 1 60 150 90 1 1
d1 120 105 120 120 365 30 150 240 180 120 120
Ll 50 34 31 10 20 10 30 35 8.5 35 27
(45pre-1989) (30pre-1989) (29pre-1983)
me 0.065 0.081 0.066 0.03 0.057 0.01 0.09 0.065 0 0.13 0.05
mp 0.065 0.081 0.066 0.03 0.057 0.16 0.09 0.065 0.05 0.13 0.05
ms 0.0004 0.0042 0.0013 0.006 0.001 0.003 0.0085 0.002 0.002 0.0013 0.001
ıp 1.05E–04 1.75E–05 1.23E+03 1.40E–02 1.05E–05 8.77E–03 4.74E–02 2.63E–02 15.788 7.00E–5 0.6
ıs 3.51E–06 1.75E–06 8.77E–08 0 6.14E–07 0 0 8.77E–07 0 2.00E–05 5.5E–5
˛ 0.06 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.1 0.1
a 0.00506 0.0052 0.0062 0.0068 0.006 0.0015 0.005 –0.0054 0.09045 0.01 0.009
b 3.1921 3.155 3.103 3 3.09 3.169 3.14 3.13 2.91 4
2.972
3.031
Ropt 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.03 0.03 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.03 0.3 0.1
Rmin 0.04 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01
Rmax 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.2
ˇ 1.1 1.1 1.1 10 10 1.1 10 10 10 1.1 10
Table3
Length-independentdietpreferenceweightingsofpost-settlement(i.e.size-classesgreaterthanthesettlementlength,Ls,inTable1)predatorsusedinthemodelruns. Pre-settlementpredatorsallfeedexclusivelyonzooplankton.Whereherringisthepredator,thepreferencesapplysolelytothepelagiceggs,larvaeandpre-settlement stagesofthepreyspecieshaveapreferenceofzero).Theentriesmarked‘–’indicateavalueofzero.
Predator
Cod Haddock Whiting Norwaypout Herring Sandeel Commondab Greygurnard Nephrops Saithe Plaice
Prey
Cod 0.199 – 0.079 – 0.317 – – 0.129 – – –
Haddock 0.133 – 0.079 – 0.040 – – 0.183 – 0.222 –
Whiting 0.199 – 0.394 – 0.040 – – 0.322 – – –
Norway pout
0.066 0.533 0.039 – 0.323 – – 0.045 – 0.112 –
Herring 0.007 0.133 0.394 – 0.040 – – – – 0.222 –
Sandeel 0.013 0.133 0.008 – 0.040 – – 0.065 – 0.222 –
Common dab
0.033 – – – 0.040 – – 0.065 – – –
Grey Gurnard
– – – – 0.040 – – – – – –
Nephrops 0.199 – – – – – – – – – –
Saithe – – – – 0.040 – – 0.013 – – –
Plaice – – – – 0.040 – – – – – –
Otherfish 0.017 0.133 0.008 – – – – 0.032 – 0.222 –
Zooplankton – – – 1.00 0.040 1.000 – – – – –
Benthos 0.133 0.067 0.008 – – – 1.000 0.146 1.00 – 1.00
density-independentmortalityrateswereincreasedby20%forthe post-2002period(Speirsetal.,2010).Initialrunsdidnotreplicate the high LFI values observed at the start (1983–1986) of the timeseriesbecauseofexceptionallyhighrecruitment(the‘gadoid
outburst’)associatedwithcoolerwatertemperatures(Olsenetal., 2011).Wethereforereducedthedensityindependentcodlarval mortalityrateby25%overtheperiod1973–1983toaccountfor this.
Table4
Parametersforthe‘unstructured’foodresources.
Description Symbol Units Zooplankton Benthos Otherfish
No.lengthclasses jmax – 100 100 100
Min.lengthclass Lmin cm 0.01 0.1 1
Max.lengthclass Lmax cm 2 5 40
Weight-at-lengthconst. a gcmb 0.5917 0.5917 0.0015
Weight-at-lengthpower b – 3 3 3
Totalbiomass T gm−2 15 70 20
Log10(P)vs.log10(w)slope k1 log10(d−1) –0.233 –0.233 –0.233
[image:5.646.45.563.72.343.2] [image:5.646.45.564.389.575.2] [image:5.646.42.561.656.743.2]Table5
Proportionsofthetotalfishingmortalityforeachspeciesattributedtoeachofsixmétiers.Thesewereusedinthemodelrunsinwhichthefishingeffortinthevariousmétiers werechangedindividually.
Species Beam
trawl
Demersalotter trawl
Nephrops trawl
Seine trawl
Industrial fishery
Herring trawl
Commondab 0.96 0.03 0.01 0.01 0 0
Nephrops 0 0.16 0.84 0 0 0
Greygurnard 0.05 0.52 0.09 0.14 0.2 0
Sandeel 0 0 0 0 1 0
Herring 0 0 0 0 0 1
Norwaypout 0 0 0 0 1 0
Plaice 0.79 0.14 0.05 0.02 0 0
Whiting 0.05 0.52 0.09 0.14 0.02 0
Haddock 0 0.67 0.03 0.23 0.07 0
Cod 0.1 0.67 0.11 0.12 0 0
Saithe 0 0.99 0 0.01 0 0
2.4. Forwardruns
Scenarioswereconfiguredtoexploretheeffectsofvariations infishingmortalityonindividualspecies,inmétiersorgroupsof speciesexploited bythe samefishery, and of fishingaccording tomaximumsustainableyieldtargets.Ineachcase,amodelrun to2008 was extended to 2020under a scenarioset of fishing mortalities.
First,wevariedfishingmortalitybyvariousproportionsofthe 2008referenceyear:acessationoffishing(0F2008),a50%reduction
(0.5F2008),acontinuationatthe2008level(F2008),a50%increase
infishing(1.5F2008),andadoublingoffishingmortality(2F2008).
Thesescenarioswereappliedtoallspeciessimultaneously,andto eachoneofthe11explicitlymodelledspeciesindividuallywhilst maintainingfishingmortalityfortheremaining10speciesatF2008.
Inmulti-speciesfisheriesitisdifficulttomanagefishingona purelyspecies-by-speciesbasisbecausedifferentfleets,ormétiers, catchmanyspecies(Ulrichetal.,2012).Toexplorethiswe clas-sifiedfishingeffortintosixmétiers:beamtrawl,demersalotter trawl, Nephrops ottertrawl, seine trawl, herring trawl, and the industrialfishery for sandeel,and apportioned thetotal fishing mortalityoneach speciestotheseonthebasis oflandingsand by-catch.Landingsof cod,haddockwhiting, saithe, plaice,sole, andNephropsfromtheNorth Seafortheperiod1997–2004are knownforbeamtrawl,demersalottertrawl,Nephropsottertrawl, andseinetrawl(Greenstreetetal.,2007).Stockassessments(ICES,
2009b)providetheby-catchofhaddockandwhitinginthe
indus-trialfishery.Forherringweassumed thattheallofthecatchis attributabletoherringtrawls,andthattheby-catchofnon-target speciesbyherringtrawlsisnegligible.Fordabandgreygurnard, weassumethattheproportionsattributabletoeachmétierwere approximatedbythoseofsoleandwhiting,respectively.The val-uesobtained(Table5)allowedustoexploretheeffectsofchanging thefishingeffortassociatedwitheachmétier.Inparticular,ifpthe proportionofthatmortalityattributabletoagivenmétier,a dou-blingoftheeffortforthatmétierwouldproduceafishingmortality of[2p+(1–p)]F2008.
Wenextcarriedoutrunstoexaminetheeffectoffishingatlevels estimatedtoproducemaximumsustainableyield(FMSY).Several
ofthespecieshavepublishedFMSY’s;cod0.19,haddock0.3,saithe
0.22,plaice0.25,andherring0.25(ICES,2012).Forwhitingweused theEU-Norwaymanagementplantargetof0.3.Forcommondab andgreygurnard,whicharemainlyby-catch,weassumeda15% reductioninfishingmortalityasanapproximationtothelevelthat mightresultincidentallyfromtargetedreductionsonotherspecies. TheFMSY’swereappliedtothespeciessimultaneously,andalsoto
eachspeciesindividually.
Giventhecriticaleffectof codrecruitmentontheLFI inthe baselinemodelrun,sixfurtherrunswereperformedtosimulate threefisheries management scenariosand two codrecruitment situations.Weconsideredacontinuationofcurrentrecruitment
levelsusingthemodeldefaultparametersandasituationwhere coddensity-independentmortalityisreducedby25%tomimichigh recruitmenttypicalofthe‘gadoidoutburst’period(Cushing,1984;
Olsenetal.,2011).Thethreefisheriesmanagementscenarioswere:
continuationoffishingatF2008forallspecies;fishingatFMSYforall
species,andacompletecessationoffishing.
Finally,wecarriedoutaseriesofrunstodeterminemore pre-ciselythemagnitudeofchangesinfishingmortalitiesrequiredfor themodeltoachievetheLFIEcoQOby2020,andtheimpactof theseoncodyield.Threemanagementscenarioswereexamined: firstly,changingfishingmortalityonallthemodelspeciesbythe samefactor;secondly,changingfishingmortalityoncodonlywhile maintainingmortalityatF2008oralltheotherspecies;andthirdly
changingfishingeffortduetoottertrawlscodonlywhile maintain-ingeffortoftheothermétiersat2008levels.
3. Results
3.1. RelationshipbetweenthecommunityLFIandthe eight-speciesLFI
Theempirical eight-speciessubsetLFI washighly correlated withtheLFIdeterminedforthewholedemersalfishcommunity (Fig.1).Thereforeamodelofthelength-compositionofthesekey
[image:6.646.35.554.84.206.2] [image:6.646.316.539.485.703.2]demersalspeciesshouldbesufficienttocapturethetemporal sig-nalinthefullcommunityLFI.Thelinearregressionindicatedthat theEcoQOLFItargetof0.3isequivalenttoavalueof0.26forthe eight-speciesLFI(Fig.1.),soweadoptedanLFImanagementtarget of0.26forthemodel.
3.2. Baselinerun
Following the temporal adjustments to pelagic mortality described in the methods, themodel captured thespecies TSB trends(Fig.2a)andlengthcompositions(Fig.2b).Themodelled
[image:7.646.52.557.127.708.2]Fig.3. Relationshipbetweenthemodelledandobservedeight-speciesLFIa)time seriesb)linearregressionwiththep-valueandcorrelationcoefficientadjustedfor time-seriesautocorrelationusingthemodifiedCheltonmethod.
LFIalsocloselymatchedobservedvariationsintheempiricalNorth SeaLFI(Fig.3a).Evenwithasuitablereductioninthedegreesof freedomtoaccount fortemporal autocorrelation (the ‘modified Chelton’method,Pyperand Peterman, 1998)themodelled and observedLFIswerehighlysignificantlycorrelatedovertheperiod from1983to2008(Fig.3b).
3.3. Forwardruns
Table6summarisesthesimulationresultswherefishing
mortal-ityisvariedacrossallspecies,byspecies,orbymétiers.Adoubling offishingpressureonthewholemodelledcommunityreducesthe LFItojustabove0.04,similartothelowestvaluesactuallyobserved (seeFig.3).Conversely,reducingthecommunityfishingmortality byaround50%producesastrongLFIrecoverytoavaluejustshort ofthe0.26target.Cessationoffishingrestorestheeight-species LFItoavalueof0.34,wellinexcessofthemodelLFItargetand correspondingtoafullLFIofnearly0.4(seeFig.1).
Similarresultsoccurifthefishingpressurechangesareapplied onlytocod whilemaintainingthe2008levelfortheremaining species. Otherthan cod, saithe is theonly species tocause an increaseintheLFIofmorethan10%whenitsfishingmortalityis reducedby50%.Interestingly,raisingfishingmortalityonsome speciescausessmallincreasesintheLFI.Insomeinstances(e.g. dab,Norwaypout), thespeciesaresmall-bodied sothat reduc-ingtheirabundanceraisestheproportionalcontributionoflarge fishtotheLFI.Inotherinstancestheeffectarisesthroughtrophic interactions.Forexample,greygurnardaremajorpredatorsof 0-groupcod(Floeteretal.,2005);reducingtheirabundancedecreases the predation loading on juvenile cod, thereby increasing cod
Table6
LFIprojectionsfor2020underdifferentscenarios.‘Allspecies’meansthatthesame proportionalchangetothefishingmortalityatlengthwasappliedtoeachspecies. Theindividualspecieslabelsmeanthatthechangeinfishingmortalitywasapplied onlytothatspecieswhiletheotherswereheldatthefishingmortalityforthe ref-erenceyear(2008).Forthevariousmétiersthefishingmortalitiesforeachspecies werechangedaccordingtotheproportionofthelandingsofthatspeciesattributed tothemétiers.Forexample,ifhalfthecatchofaspeciescomesfromottertrawls andhalffrombeamtrawls,andthebeamtrawlfishingmortalityisincreasedby 50%,thenthefishingmortalityforthatspecieswouldincreaseby25%.Themodel LFIachievedbymaintaining2008fishingmortalitiesis0.134.
Changeappliedover Nofishing F2008×0.5 F2008×1.5 F2008×2
Allspecies 0.340 0.234 0.066 0.044
Cod 0.323 0.217 0.087 0.084
Ottertrawleffort 0.285 0.205 0.077 0.051
Saithe 0.170 0.150 0.121 0.111
Seinetrawleffort 0.154 0.144 0.124 0.115
Nephropstrawleffort 0.151 0.142 0.126 0.118
Beamtrawleffort 0.148 0.140 0.127 0.121
Haddock 0.146 0.139 0.130 0.126
Whiting 0.151 0.139 0.133 0.134
Plaice 0.136 0.135 0.133 0.132
Industrialfisheryeffort 0.135 0.134 0.133 0.133
Sandeel 0.134 0.134 0.133 0.133
Nephrops 0.134 0.134 0.134 0.134
Norwaypout 0.132 0.133 0.135 0.136
Herringtrawl 0.129 0.132 0.135 0.136
Herring 0.129 0.132 0.135 0.136
Commondab 0.131 0.132 0.136 0.138
Greygurnard 0.127 0.131 0.136 0.139
recruitment.Similarly,herringarepredatorsofcodeggsandlarvae, soreducingherringabundanceincreasescodrecruitment.
Codandsaitheareprimarilylandedbyottertrawlers(Table5), sovaryingthefishingpressureexertedbythismétierhadastrong influenceontheLFI.Reductioninottertrawleffortalonewould appeartobesufficienttoreachtheEcoQOtarget(Table6). Chang-ingtheeffortinthemétiersthatcatchfewornocod(seinetrawl,
Nephropstrawl,beamtrawl,industrialsandeelfishery)have min-imalimpactontheLFI. Changingtheeffortintheherringtrawl métieristhesameaschangingtheherringfishingmortality,i.e.a smallincreaseintheLFIwithincreasingeffort.Overall,ottertrawls aretheonlymétierwherechangesineffortarecapableofachieving thetargetLFIwheneverythingelseisheldconstant.
ReducingfishingmortalitytoFMSY onallspeciesproduced a
modelled2020LFIvaluethatexceededthemodeltargetof0.26
(Table7).Moreover,thetargetwasstillachievedwhenonlycod
isfishedatFMSYwhiletheotherspeciesarefishedatF2008.This
Table7
Percentagereductioninfishingmortalityfromthereferenceyear(2008)requiredto achieveFMSY,andtheresultingmodelledeight-speciesLFIfor2020.Thepercentage
changeinfishingmortalitywhenthechangeisappliedtoallspeciesisthe arith-meticmeanoftheindividualspecies.ForspecieswithoutapublishedFMSY,ortarget
fishingmortalityweassumedeithernochange(Nephrops,sandeelNorwaypout) ora15%reductioninfishingmortalityinordertoreflectareductioninbycatch. Thefinalcolumngivesthepercentagedifferenceinthe2020LFIunderthevarious manipulationscomparedtothatusing2008fishingmortalities.
Species %changein
fishingmortality
2020
eight-speciesLFI
%change inLFI
All –14.5 0.294 120.0
Cod –75.9 0.271 102.5
Saithe –27.4 0.159 18.6
Whiting –36.2 0.137 2.4
Herring 5.9 0.134 0.1
Nephrops 0.0 0.134 0.0
Sandeel 0.0 0.134 0.0
Norwaypout –15.0 0.134 0.0
Plaice 0.0 0.134 0.0
Commondab –15.0 0.133 –0.4
Greygurnard –15.0 0.133 –0.6
[image:8.646.41.274.54.379.2] [image:8.646.302.553.613.743.2]Fig.4.Time-seriesprojectionsofthemodelledeight-speciesLFIundertwocodrecruitmentscenariosa)pre-settlementmodelmortalityparametersunalteredfromthe baseline,andb)a‘gadoidoutburst’withincreasedsurvivalofpre-settlementcod.Eachpanelcontainsthreefishingscenarios–2008fishingmortalities(dashedlines),FMSY (solidlines),andthecessationoffishing(dot-dashedlines).Thehorizontallineindicatestheeight-speciesLFItargetvalue(0.26).
arisesbothbecauseoftheimportanceoflargecodtotheLFI,and becausecod FMSY isverymuchlowerthanF2008(areductionof
75.9%).Saithewasonceagaintheonlyotherspecieswhere adjus-tingtoFMSYproducedanotable(18.6%)increaseintheLFI,albeit
oneinsufficienttoreachtheEcoQO.Whitingfishingmortalityin 2008wasconsiderablyhigherthanitsFMSY,butsincewhitingdo
notcontributegreatlytothebiomassabove40cm,fishingatFMSY
hadlittleimpactonthemodelledLFI.
Conversely,haddockF2008wasalreadysubstantiallylowerthan
estimatedFMSY,soadoptingFMSYforthisspecieshadminimaleffect
ontheLFI.
Figure4showsLFItime-seriesprojectionsunderhighandlow
codrecruitmentscenarios.Whendefaultrecruitmentparameters wereused,and fishingwasatF2008,theprojectedLFIremained
almostconstantatlevelsclosetothoseatthestartoftheprojected period(Fig.4a,dashedline).Attheotherextreme,immediate ces-sationoffishingcausedrapidrecoveryoftheLFIandthe0.26target wasreachedafteronlyfouryears(Fig.4a,dot-dashedline).Fishing atFMSYresultsinaslowerresponse,butthetargetisstillexceeded
aftersevenyears(Fig.4a,solidline).Enhancedcod recruitment producedhigherbutqualitativelysimilarLFItrendsunderthese threefishingscenarios(Fig.4b),buttheLFItargetwasstillnotmet whenF2008wasmaintained(Fig.4b,dashedline).Evenwerecod
recruitmenttoimprovemarkedlyinthenearfuture,our simula-tionssuggestthatitwouldstillnotbepossibletocontinuefishing at2008levelsandhopetomeettheLFIEcoQO.
Fig.5shows2020modelledLFIandcodyieldasfishingmortality orottertrawleffortisvariedcontinuously.Asfishingmortalityon
[image:9.646.77.533.54.264.2] [image:9.646.75.533.481.703.2]codaloneincreasestheLFIdeclinesmonotonically(Fig.5a,solid line).Atacodfishingmortalityof50%overF2008thecodstockis
unabletopersistandtheLFIresponselevelsoff(Fig.5a,solidline) andyieldfallstowardszero(Fig.5b,solidline).A70%reduction ofcodfishingmortalityfromF2008issufficienttoachievethe0.26
target(Fig.5a,solidline),avaluethatislessthanthe76%reduction requiredtoreachFMSY.Whenfishingmortalitychangesareapplied
toallthespeciestheLFIresponseissimilar,butonlya60%reduction isneededtoreachthetarget(Fig.5a,dashedline).Bycontrast,ifthe fishingmortalityismanagedonlythroughtheottertrawlmétiera greaterreduction(75%)isneededtoachievethesameresult(Fig.5a, dot-dashedline).
Inallcasesreducingfishingmortalitysufficientlytomeetthe EcoQOtargetresultedincodyieldsbetween25%and60%higher thanthoseobtainediffishingmortalitywasmaintainedatF2008
(Fig.5b).Codlandingsweremaximisedbyareductionin mortal-ityoncodaloneofapproximately40%(Fig.5b,solidline)withan annualyieldofjustunder150kilotonnes.However,when mortal-itywasreducedonallspecies,notonlywasthereductionrequired toachievetheEcoQOless,butprojectedyieldwasabout10%higher (Fig.5b,dashedline).Whenottertrawleffortisreducedsufficiently tomeettheEcoQO,codyieldisclosetoitsmaximumvalueandis over20kilotonneshigherthanthatobtainedwhenthetargetismet bychangingfishingmortalityoncodaloneorbychangingfishing mortalityonallofthespeciessimultaneously.
4. Discussion
Ourmodelreplicated long-termtemporal trendsin boththe biomassandsize-compositionoftheexplicitlymodelledspecies, and the resulting derived LFI correlated significantly with the empiricalLFIprovided thatanexternallydrivenincrease inthe earlylifestagesurvivalofcodduringthe1970swasintroduced. Codrecruitmentisknowntohavebeensystematicallyhigher dur-ingthisperiod, associatedwithreducedtemperaturesandhigh zooplankton abundance during the so-called ‘gadoid outburst’
(Cushing,1984;BeaugrandandKirby,2010;Olsenetal.,2011).The
modelcouldthereforebeusedtoexploretheeffectsofdifferent fisheriesmanagementscenarios onfuture LFItrajectories, espe-ciallywiththeinclusionofhighandlowcodrecruitmentscenarios toboundtheprojections.
Ourresultsconfirmthattheeight-speciesLFIprimarilyreflects thefortunesof cod,whichis themajorlargebodiedfishinthe NorthSea.Thelong-termdeclineofmodelledcodabundancefrom the1980stotheearly2000swastheprincipaldriverofthe corre-spondingdeclineintheLFI.Bytheendofthisperiodcodabundance wassimilartothatofsaithe,whichprovedtobethenextmost influentialspecies.Recentlowcodabundancecoupledwithasmall increaseinsaithebiomassfromthemid-1990swasresponsiblefor thesmallpartialrecoveryintheeight-speciesLFIsincetheearly 2000s.TheseresultsmatchthosefoundinthefullNorthSeaLFI, whichisapproximately66%dependentoncodand33%dependent onsaithe(Greenstreetetal.,2011,2012a).Giventhedominance ofcodinthe>40cmbiomassdistributionthemaindriversofthe LFIarethefishingmortalityrateoncodandthevariationsinits recruitment.Significantly,modelresultsindicatethatevenwithout areturntothehighrecruitmentofthegadoidoutburstperiodthe EcoQOLFIlevelsareattainablewithreductionsinfishing mortal-ityequivalenttothoseestimatedtoachievemaximumsustainable yield.
Themajoritycodandsaithelandingscomefromvesselsusing demersalottertrawls,sotheeffortassociatedwiththismétieris theprincipaldriveroffishingmortalityonthesespeciesandhence amajordeterminantoftheLFI.AlthoughtheLFIwasdeveloped asanindicatorof theimpactof fishingin general(Greenstreet
etal.,2011), ourresultsindicatethatit ismostly a measureof ottertrawlimpactsandthattheEcoQOLFIcanbeattainedsolely throughcontrollingottertrawleffort.Froma management per-spectivethisisimportantbecausecontrollingeffortbymétiersis easierthanattemptingtocontrolfishingmortalitiesona species-by-speciesbasisinamulti-speciesfishery.Moreover,althoughthe reductioninottertrawleffortneededtoachievetheEcoQOexceeds thatrequiredwhenthecommunity-widefishingeffortischanged, itis considerablylessthanwhenonly thecod fishingmortality isreduced.Significantly,projectedcodlandingsaresubstantially higherwhentheEcoQOismetbyreducingottertrawleffortthan whenitisachievedbytheothermeasures.
Ourmodelconsistentlyshowsarapidapproachtothesteady stateunderconstant fishingmortality.Althoughin mostofthe scenarios trueequilibrium LFIvalues werenot achievedwithin 15years,approximatesteadystateswerereachedin10yearsor less.ThisresultisatvariancewiththoseofFungetal.(2013)who, usingthePDMMapproachreferredtointheintroduction,observed multi-decadalrecovery timescales fortheLFI. Twocritical dif-ferencesbetweenthePDMM andourmodelmayunderpinthis differenceinresponsetimescales.First,thePDMMisa commu-nityassemblymodelaimedatgeneratingspecies-richcommunities (29–189species)withoutindividuallyparameterisinglarge num-bersofequationstorepresentingidentifiablebiologicalspecies.It thereforeinvolvesmanymorespeciesandconsequently,as sug-gestedbyFungetal.(2013),trophiccascadestakealongtimeto dampdown.Second,althoughspeciesinthePDMMareassigned abodysize,differentbodysizeswithineachspeciesarenot rep-resented.Thismeansthat thecommunitylengthdistributionis achievedbytherelativeabundancesofspecieswithdifferent nom-inalbodysizes,andsotheonlymechanismpermittingtherecovery oftheLFIafteraperiodofintensefishingisreproductiveincrease inspeciesabundanceongenerationaltime-scales.Bycontrast,our model explicitly representsthelength distributionwithin each species, and hence can produce rapid increase in the LFI as a directconsequenceofindividualgrowthwhenfishingmortality isreduced andagreater proportionofsmallfishalreadyinthe populationgrowtolargersize.
Ourresultssuggestthatrecoveryoftheeight-speciesLFIand hencethefullNorthSeaLFImaybepossiblewithinashorttimescale provided that thereduction onfishing mortality is sufficiently large.Forpragmaticreasonsweused2008asourtransitionpoint betweenthehistoricalandforwardrunsbutfishingmortalityhas declinedformostspeciessince2008(ICES,2013).Althoughthis meansthattheabsoluteyearsinourforwardrunsaredisplaced byfiveyears,thetimescalesoftheLFIresponsesarelargely unaf-fected.By2008fishingmortalityacrosstheNorthSeademersalfish communityhaddroppedbyaround57%fromitspeakin1986.Our analysissuggeststhatfishingmortalityneedsafurtherreduction of60%(whenthereductionisappliedtoallspecies)fromthe2008 valuestopermittheEcoQOLFItobereached,oranapproximate 50%reductionfrom2012values.Thusatotalreductionfrom1986 peakfishinglevelsof83%isrequired.Thisimpliesthatinthe mid-1980s,fishingmortalitywasapproximatelyfivetimesthelevelthat wenowconsiderconsistentwithmaintaininggoodenvironmental statusforthebroaderdemersalfishcommunityoftheNorthSea.
Acknowledgements
References
Beare,D.J.,Burns,F.,Greig,A.,Jones,E.G.,Peach,K.,Kienzle,M.,McKenzie,E., Reid,D.G.,2004.Long-termincreasesinprevalenceofNorthSeafishes hav-ing southernbiogeographicaffinities. MarineEcology ProgressSeries 284, 269–278.
Beaugrand,G.,Kirby,R.R.,2010.Climate,planktonandcod.GlobalChangeBiology 16,1268–1280.
Blanchard,J.L.,Jennings,S.,Law,R.,Castle,M.D.,McCloghrie,P.,Rochet,M.J.,Benoit, E.,2009.Howdoesabundancescalewithbodysizeincoupledsize-structured foodwebs?JournalofAnimalEcology78,270–280.
Blanchard,J.L.,Andersen,K.H.,Scott,F.,Hintzen,N.T.,Piet,G.,Jennings,S.,2014.
Evaluatingtargetsandtrade-offsamongfisheriesandconservationobjectives usingamultispeciessizespectrum model.Journal ofAppliedEcology51, 612–622.
Christensen,V.,Guénette,S.,Heymans,J.J.,Walters,C.J.,Watson,R.,Zeller,D.,Pauly, D.,2003.Hundred-yeardeclineofNorthAtlanticpredatoryfishes.Fishand Fish-eries4,1–24.
Cushing,D.H.,1984.ThegadoidoutburstintheNorthSea.JournalduConseil Inter-nationalpourl’ExplorationdelaMer41,159–166.
Daan,N.,Gislason,H.,Pope,J.G.,Rice,J.C.,2005.ChangesintheNorthSeafish com-munity:evidenceofindirecteffectsoffishing?ICESJournalofMarineScience 62,177–188.
EuropeanCommission,2.9.2010.CommissionDecisionof1September2010on criteriaandmethodologicalstandardsongoodenvironmentalstatusofmarine waters.OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnionL232,14–24.
Floeter,J.,Kempf,A.,Vinther,M.,Schrum,C.,Temming,A.,2005.Greygurnard (Eutriglagurnadus)intheNorthSea:anemergingkeypredator?Canadian Jour-nalofFisheriesandAquaticSciences62,1853–1864.
Frank,K.T.,Petrie,B.D.,Choi,J.S.,Leggett,W.C.,2005.Trophiccascadesinaformerly cod-dominatedecosystem.Science308,1621–1623.
Fung,T.,Farnsworth,K.D.,Reid,D.G.,Rossberg,A.G.,2012.Recentdatasuggestno furtherrecoveryinNorthSeaLargeFishIndicator.ICESJournalofMarineScience 69,235–239.
Fung,T.,Farnsworth,K.D.,Shephard,S.,Reid,D.G.,Rossberg,A.G.,2013.Whythesize structureofmarinecommunitiescanrequiredecadestorecoverfromfishing. MarineecologyProgressSeries484,155.
Greenstreet,S.P.R.,Fraser,H.M.,Rogers,S.I.,Trenkel,V.M.,Simpson,S.D.,Pinnegar, J.K.,2012b.Redundancyinmetricsdescribingthecomposition,structure,and functioningoftheNorthSeademersalfishcommunity.ICESJournalofMarine Science69,8–22.
Greenstreet,S.P.R.,Robinson,L.A.,Piet,G.J.,Craeymeersch,J.,Callaway,R.,Reiss,H., Ehrich,S.,Kröncke,I.,Fraser,H.M.,Lancaster,J.,Jorgensen,L.,Goffin,A.,2007.The EcologicalDisturbanceCausedbyFishingintheNorthSea.FisheriesResearch ServicesCollaborativeReport04/07,169.
Greenstreet,S.P.R.,Rogers,S.I.,2006.IndicatorsofthehealthoftheNorthSeafish community:15identifyingreferencelevelsforanecosystemapproachto man-agement.ICESJournalofMarineScience63,573–593.
Greenstreet,S.P.R.,Rogers,S.I.,Rice,J.C.,Piet,G.J.,Guirey,E.J.,Fraser,H.M.,Fryer,R.J., 2011.DevelopmentoftheEcoQOfortheNorthSeafishcommunity.ICESJournal ofMarineScience68,1–11.
Greenstreet,S.P.R.,Rogers,S.I.,Rice,J.C.,Piet,G.J.,Guirey,E.J.,Fraser,H.M.,Fryer, R.J.,2012a.AreassessmentoftrendsintheNorthSeaLargeFishIndicator andare-evaluationofearlierconclusions.ICESJournalofMarineScience69, 343–345.
Hall,S.J.,Collie,J.S.,Duplisea,D.,Jennings,S.,Bravington,M.,Link,J.,2006. A length-basedmultispeciesmodelforevaluatingcommunityresponsesto fish-ing.CanadianJournalofFisheriesandAquaticSciences63,1344–1359.
Hartvig, M., Andersen,K.H., Beyer, J.E., 2011. Food webframework for size-structuredpopulations.JournalofTheoreticalBiology272,113–122.
Heath,M.R.,Speirs,D.C.,2012.ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietySeriesB.Changes inspeciesdiversityandsizecompositionintheFirthofClydedemersalfish community(1927–2009).279,543–552.
Heithaus,M.R.,Frid,A.,Wirsing,A.J.,Worm,B.,2008.Predictingecological conse-quencesofmarinetoppredatordeclines.TrendsinEcologyandEvolution23, 202–210.
Heslenfeld,P.,Enserink,E.L.,2008.OSPAREcologicalQualityObjectives:the util-ityofhealthindicatorsfortheNorthSea.ICESJournalofMarineScience65, 1392–1397.
ICES,2009a.ReportoftheHerringAssessmentWorkingGroupfortheAreaSouthof 62N,17–25March2009,ICESHeadquarters,Copenhagen.,648.
ICES,2009b.ReportoftheWorkingGroupontheAssessmentofDemersalStocksin theNorthSeaandSkagerrak–CombinedSpringandAutumn(WGNSSK),6–12 May2009,ICESHeadquarters,Copenhagen.,10028pp.
ICES,2010.ManualfortheInternationalBottomTrawlSurveys–RevisionIII.ICES, Copenhagen,Denmark.
ICES,2012.ReportoftheICESAdvisoryCommittee2012-ICESAdvice2012Book6. NorthSea,447pp.
ICES,2013.ReportoftheWorkingGroupontheAssessmentofDemersalStocksin theNorthSeaandSkagerrak(WGNSSK),24–30April2013,ICESHeadquarters, Copenhagen.ICESCM2012/ACOM:13,1346pp.
Modica,L.,Velasco,F.,Preciado,I.,Soto,M.,Greenstreet,S.P.R.,2014.Developmentof thelargefishindicatorandassociatedEcologicalQualityObjectivefora North-EastAtlanticfishcommunity.ICESJournalofMarineScience,http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/icesjms/fsu101.
Molloy,P.P.,McLean,I.B.,Cote,I.M.,2009.Effectsofmarinereserveageonfish populations:aglobalmeta-analysis.JournalofAppliedEcology46,743–751.
Myers,R.,Worm,B.,2003.Rapidworldwidedepletionofpredatoryfish communi-ties.Nature423,280–283.
Olsen,E.M.,Ottersen,G.,Llope,M.,Chand,K.-S.,Beagrand,G.,Stenseth,N.C.,2011.
SpawningstockandrecruitmentinNorthSeacodshapedbyfoodandclimate. ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyB278,504–510.
Payne,M.R.,Hatfield,E.M.C.,Dickey-Collas,M.,Falkenhaug,T.,Gallego,A.,Groger, J.,Licandro,P.,llope,M.,Munk,P.,Rockman,C.,Schmidt,J.O.,Nash,R.D.M., 2009.Recruitmentinachangingenvironment:the2000’sNorthSeaherring recruitmentfailure.ICESJournalofMarineScience66,272–277.
Pope,J.G.,Rice,J.C.,Daan,N.,Jennings,S.,Gislason,H.,2006.Modellinganexploited marinefishcommunitywith15parameters—resultsfromasimplesize-based model.ICESJournalofMarineScience63,1029–1044.
Pope,J.G.,MacDonald,D.S.,Daan,N.,Reynolds,J.D.,Jennings,S.,2000.Gaugingthe impactoffishingmortalityonnon-targetspecies.ICESJournalofMarineScience 53,1157–1169.
Pyper,B.J.,Peterman,R.M.,1998.Comparisonofmethodstoaccountfor autocor-relationincorrelationanalysisoffishdata.CanadianJournalofFisheriesand AquaticSciences55,2127–2140.
Rochet,M.-J.,Collie,J.S.,Jennings,S.,Hall,S.J.,2011.Doesselectivefishingconserve communitybiodiversity?Predictionsfromalength-basedmultispeciesmodel. CanadianJournalofFisheriesandAquaticSciences68,469–486,http://dx.doi. org/10.1139/F10-159.
Rossberg,A.G.,Ishii,R.,Amemiya,T.,Itoh,K.,2008.Thetop-downmechanismfor body-massabundancescaling.Ecology89,567–580.
Shephard,S.,Fung,T.,Houle,J.E.,Farnsworth,K.D.,Reid,D.G.,Rossberg,A.G.,2012.
Size-selectivefishingdrivesspeciescompositionintheCelticSea.ICESJournal ofMarineScience69,223–234.
Shephard,S.,Greenstreet,S.P.R.,Reid,D.G.,2011.Interpretingthelargefishindicator fortheCelticSea.ICESJournalofMarineScience68,1963–1972.
Shin,Y.J.,Rochet,M.J.,Jennings,S.,Field,J.G.,Gislason,H.,2005.Usingsize-based indicatorstoevaluatetheecosystemeffectsoffishing.ICESJournalofMarine Science62,384–396.
Simpson,S.D.,Jennings,S.,Johnson,M.P.,Blanchard,J.L.,Schön,P.-J.,Sims,D.W., Genner,M.J.,2011.Continentalshelf-wideresponseofafishassemblagetorapid warmingofthesea.CurrentBiology21,1565–1570.
Speirs,D.C.,Guirey,E.J.,Gurney,W.S.C.,Heath,M.R.,2010.Alength-structured par-tialecosystemmodelforcodintheNorthSea.FisheriesResearch106,474–494.
Thorpe,R.B.,LeQuesne,W.J.F.,Luxoford,F.,Collie,J.S.,Jennings,S.,2015.Evaluation andmanagementimplicationsofuncertaintyinamultispeciessize-structured modelofpopulationandcommunityresponsestofishing.MethodsinEcology andEvolution6,49–58,http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12292. Ulrich,C.,Wilson,D.C.K.,Nielsen,J.R.,Bastardie,F.,Reeve,S.A.,Andersen,B.S.,