I
COMMISSTON OF lHA
AUROFEAN COilMUTITIES Diredtorate-general
fnternal
l{arket Directorate Approxlme.tlonof
Lawsl comoaniee,public
contracts,intellectuaL
property,fair
competltion, general questlonsxr/c/t
i\ '/r
REPORT OT TAI{EOVER IIfD CIIIMR SIDS
by
hofcseor
Robqrtn.
IEilmfGlOl{ Special&lviscr
of
thc
ESCxr/s6/ru
-
nr
\1
It
t1
COMMISSION OF [iTE
IXJROPEAN 6OMMUN]T15S
nlm/w-n
Directorate-General
for
the International
MarketDirectorate
for
the
Approximatj-onof
Lavrs:
ComPanies and FirmstPublic Contracts,
Intellectual
PropertY,
Fair
ComPetitiont General Mattersxr/c/t
AnDm{Dr]lI [CI Docultmfr vJ./56n4
Ad.d.itional
Article
prepared.by
Professor Perueingtonfor
inclu-sion
in
the
Fuggesteddraft
Directive
containedin
his
Report on Take-Over3ids.
Artic1e.2
41.
The governmerttsof
MemberStates
shaLl ensurethat
their
respective
natio-nal
laws and.practices
in
respect
of
generalbids
conformto
the
prin-,
cipj-esset out
in
paragraph2
of
this
Articler
This
requirement shal-Iapply
to
legislation
enactedin
order
to
give
effect
to
the
specifio
reErirementsof thiq
Directive set
out
hereafter
andto all
other
rele-vant
1aw,professional
andother
codesof
conduct and-praetioe
andeon-duct
and-practices
actually
engaged.in, in
corunectionwith
general bid"s.x2.Theprinoiplesreferred"toinparagraphlareasfollows:
*
d.ed general bid.
will
be addressed, shal1 be treated' on abasis of
,,
oqual-ity; no special
advanta8e may be givenor
offered'only
to
oer-tain of
those personst and. advantages given o:r offered'to
the
generality
of
those persons maynot
bewithheld
from anyof
theml\
>-I
-2-
xr/gths-n
t)
fire
off,efor
anrlthe offeree
company shal.l give .to 'the personsto
whom
a
general bid. 1s acldressed.a1t the
information
whichis
neces-sary
to
enable them.to
evaluatethe
bid. andto
as&es,sthe
conse-quencesof
acceptingor rejecting
it;
c)
ttre directors
of
the
offeror
andthe offeree
companyshall act
ex-oLusively
in
the interests
of.the
hold.ersof
seourities
issued bytheir
respective
companies, andin
the
eventof conflicts of
interest
between
the
hold.ersof different
classosof
suchsecurities
theyshal-l
act
in
the interests
of
the.holders
of
ordinary
shares;the
d.irec-tors of
the
offeror
and.the offeree
companyshall not
d.oor
abstainfrom any
act
in
order
to
promotetheir
ovili personalor
family
inte-rests
or
the interests
of
anlrother
person;t 1r- f
a)
ffre d.irectors
of
the
offeree'company and.collaborators
with
it
shall not
do anyaot
or
enter
into
anytransaction
whichis likely
to
frustrate
a
generaLbid
or
an intended generalbid of
which theyare
awaren r:rtlessthe act
or
tfansaction
haspreviously
beenexpress-ly
approved.by a
general meetingof
the offeree
company;they
maynevertheless recommend
the rejection
of
the
bid
andpublish
infor-mation and,l argument
in
suppoit
of
a
recommend.ationfor
rejeotion;
e)
Tneparties
to
a
geheraLbid
shaLl:.not'enterintg
real-or
fei'g5red'transactions
in
secr:ritles
of
the offerori
or
offeree
c&rparly i-nantici$ation
of
a
general b:i.d. being: mad'efor
securities
of
tlreofferee
companyor
d.uringthd
period.fbr
acoepianceof
such ageneral
bid
if
the
pi:rposeof
so doingis
to
raise
or
depress thequoted.
or
d.ealingprice
of
the seourities
in
order
to
encourage theacceptance ,or
rejection
of
the
bid.by
the, personsto
whomit is
orwill
be ad.dressbd. )t_
-T-PRETACE
'
Takeoverbids are
a
phenomenonof
the
perioclsince
th,
t
seconc'
liorld
lJar-
lhey
appoaredfirst in
the
uniteQKingio,.r ancl the
united
states
during the
late
1940s asa
techniquefor
gainingcontrol
oi
a
companywithout
the
need.to
ncgotiate
a
mergerof
the
tra.illtional
l<ind
vrith
its
boardof d.irectors. rn effect,
the
offeror
or. bld.6er appealedto
the
sharehoLdersof
the
cornpanyin
question ovc;- tire headsof
the
incumbentciirectors,
and. sought byoffering
thema
pr.lcc
-.cr:thcir
holdings r'rhich wasin
excessof
the current
marketprice
to
reject
the
incutnbentdirectors
in
favour
of
the
offeror.
T}.eearliest
bid"s were r.;o;Llyof this
contentiouslciird,
but
the
simplicity of
the
nethodof
transferring
contrlt ot""
the
offeree
company by meansof a
,id
for its
;ilares
soon induccdofferors
and boardsof
offeree
companics wh,. werein
i'jrcementas
to
the
termsof
the bid
to
useit
asa
c.onvenic.:t instrunent*or
vesting
control
in
the
offeror.
These agreedbids
lverc ecopomicallyrn l--r-i ra nara *L
t
l1uurr-Lrrr;'u'e rnan mergers
caryied
out
by.a
different lcgal
--_,rn! ...r..clu;:ing
the
last fifteen
years suchbids
havefar
outnur,rberei co;.tentlousr)j.(i5 o
rnevitably
abuses and r.urfairpractices
have occurrcdi'
,',1r,1 n
^ii nn ,.,i *L
uvllrtsuurulr wrr,tr takeover
bids,
attdnational
legislation in
r:omeof
ihc r'':i;:bcrstates
of
the
European Cornrnunities andprofessional :'i;.lcr
,.1nd cc,.l.cso'f
conductin
others have been devisedto
counterthem.
Becauseof
the coilirarati've newnessof
the
takeoverbid
as a.financial
ope;:tior
thene
ic
;r
considerable d.ifference betureenthe
standardsprescritcd
by thi.s1c;;islation
or
quasi-regislation,
and.in
some rnemberstates
!._lc''e are no''ules
speci.fically directed
to
deal vrith the
problems c.reated bytir.icover
bids-
Thebid
tecimiqueis
novr employed ona gieater
or- less
;cale
in all
the
menberstates,
andsince
it is likely to
beempl,oyed
irr.rreasingly
in
the
future, it is
appropriate
that
harmonisationmea;ures should be taken now, based. on
the
experienceof
tht_*alt
twenty ycars.
-rr-Although
in
some ;ienberstatcs reliance
has bce:. ,;laccd onI
p:'ofessional
rulcs
and ,cocccof
cond.uctto
restrain
abuses ;:acl;;a1-r.^l.^.|.jnacjh^^b.^-.+.:^.'.j!'^!^:.^^-...'1....l-'r-qvuiuer, .rrr. r;orrtcction
r.r:-t,.!r tal'.covcr
bids, it
has bccn rv:delyi'ccognised
that
furrdancntal.ly biclsinvolve
questionsof
la',.r (suclt as;--:
l-cgalrights
and ri.utiesof
rneparties
arrd.ihe civil ani
crj.:iinaLremedies anci sanctions
available a;ainst then),
andthat c-,-:;:tuaiiy
ihenrnln-n-i
nnrl .'llcs
rrqJ. 4 ureD ;.nd coclcl qrtu evuuvof
9I co.ru;ct, adopted UUil(4JU L dU(,-IJ UgUin
sone r,1c.i.. -;cr i-;;atrcsr'rilL have
to
bc clotheciin lcg;il
formif
tiieryare
to
be rnacl:ef-cctiue..
!;tis is
not
surprising,
bccaucea
t;dreoverbic
byits
very
natu:c
insolvesa aav-i^^ ^a 1^-^a !--- -r'
q
eerluDui
-Lug&Itransactiols
-
ar:offer
to,acquire
charcsor
bond.s mad.ero
nurncrous personGrthe transfer
sf
tliosesecuriiies
to i;:c offeror,
the.xayrncnt
of
the
price offered
or
tl'rcfurnishingof the other
considera'iionoifcred
for
the
sha.res, such asj a.nissue
bythe
offeror
conipanyof
i.:s
orrn shares
oi'
bonds.
fliese
transactio:'t.s, moreover,are
mole cornple::+t^-h ^- .i - 'i.: ',.: l. '
{,r.1<11 .ur. rrro:vLqual
sale
of
sharcs by oneseller to
or-c buyc;', a;rcl thclgcneral
iules of
lalv governingsales are
not
ad.equatcto
c- ._;rc -;hat the transactionsare properly
:rndfairL;r
carried.out.
ri:oecc.
rhe
;nhe.sisof
the
generallalr
in
seclii:ig
to
nrotect the
buyeragain;-;
tne
se11e3lranofi rttrr.trrrLr-ri$ ti nm rrn f-; urtrat-rJ-y --t.' L," '^.i - ).^ r !-py nLs cecEcr larowLedge
of
the
subject mattcr
of
thesale
hasto
beinverted
in
ihe
caseof
takeoverbids,
becausethe offeror,
asintending
buyerr always l<nol.rs nore aboutthe offeree
conla:ry and the valueof its
shares than manyof its
shareholders, who may have only small holdings and d.ependentirely
onthe
companyrs annual accounts an4the
currently
quotedstock
exchangeprice
of their
shares r,rhennegotiat-;.-.- ^ ^^1^ 4r-b d, b<.t.I.9 r
'
ft is difficuli to classify
the
branchof
comrnerciall-.. ,'
i:nier
irhich takeover
bids
shoulcl be subsunecl.
since
banksoften act
asau:<iliaries
i.n rnakingor
defendingbicis,
banking lar,.r nay be invoived., andsince the
sharesbid
for
are
usually
quoted ona
stock
exchai,,:ar:'d' d'ealings
in
thera duringa bid are
regulated bythe
stock
excr-angers-III-rulcs,
the
ravrof
stock
exchanges mayenter the
picture.
Easically,
.t
noweverr takeover
bids
are
concerned.with
questionsof
compariy 1a'r.fne subject
rnatterof
the bid
is
sharesor
bondsof
the
offeree
conpanyl
and
the
right's
attachedto
thenr andthe
proced.urefor their
transfer
is
in
the
domainof
cornpanyJ_al.r.
fhe
result of
a
successful ta.l<eovc,r bid
is that co'tror of
the
company passesto
the
offeror,
andilie
rights
and. povrers he rnay clairn and
the duties
he
is
under towarcri::e
conpany and any remaining sharehold,ersare
also
the subject matter
ai
conpany law.. LSreed tal<eoversare
comfiercially and economicallythe
equivalent
of
rncrgers' and mergersare traditionaltry
regarded, as an aspectof
company'iau,
except w:.thrlgard
to their
aaticompetitive
effects,
r,rhich;rrercgulated by the
1aw governing nonopolies andnarket
domination. The characterof
the
lavrrelating to
takeoyerslargery
d.eter-ri:ines
its
form anclcontent. rt vrill
not
suffice to
set
up an
adninist-raiive
authority witfr brjad discretionary
povrersto
irnirose requj ..e.rrerts and
prohibitions
onthe
parties
to
takeoverbids
on an aci i:oq b.^sis.
-tleis
approach may besatisfactory
in
controlling
the
activiti_es
cl
banking and
financial institutions,
whichare
l-icensedby;:c.stii;e
tocarry
out
operationsrvith
an immediate impaci onthe
public
and then'a-bional
econony-
flakeoverbids,
in
contrast,
are
operations i..,j]creprivate interests primarily
needto
beprotected,
andthis
can
only
bedone by
legislation
vrhichlays
dovrnprecise
substantiverules
andpres-cribes
a
fairly
detailed
proced,ure.
,fhe
objective
c]rarac;o::of
suchlegisJ-a-bion makes
it
an extensionof
traditionar.
companyr;.,..
r,-.-_.s
is
iiot' of
course,to
saythat
ihe regulation
of
the
anticompei:itiveeffects
oi
;:.crgers and tarreovers can be treated.in
the
se..re
rray,
Tiris
i;
anc-.;irnely
dlffcreni
problern fromthe
regulation
of
iakeoversas
connercial o-oerations, andis
whol1youtside
the
scopeof this
report
and ilreREPORT ON TAKEOITER AND OTTiER BIDS.
I
INTRoDUCTTON1'
the
expre66ion rrtakeoverbidr
andite
Frenchequivalent,
rrg€€rg nublique drachat ou df6chaneer, have never been comprcr.e..civery definedby
legisration,
but are
generarry understoodto
nean anofft:r
made tothe
existing
ehareholdersof
a
cornpanxror to
oneor
moie c*;rssesof
such shareholders,to
acquire
their
aharesfor
a
considerationrn
cashor
securities
(i.e.
sharesor
bonds),the
purposeof
the
offer
usually beingto
tranofer control
of
the
conpanyto
the
offeror,
andthe
offer
being made
conditional
uponeufficient
offerees
acceptingit to
ensurethat control
is
acquiredby the
offeror.
fhe
offeror is
invariably
acompanyt though
in
law therb
is
nothing
to
pteventa
rakeover bi<i beingnade by an
individual.
Abid
nay,
of
course, be rnadefor
sucha
snalr
quantity
of
sharesthat
evenif
the
bid
is
successful, the
offeror
will
not
havecontror
of
the
offeree
conpany,but
it is
not
then known as atakeover
bid
in Britaia.
Sucha bid
nust
inevitably
bea
partial
bid(i-e.
a bid
for
nonore
thana fixed
numberof
shares),
but
it
dc.:s not,of
course, foLlowthat
a
partial
bid
will
neyerresult in
the
offeror
gaining
control
of
the
offeree company.
Abid
made by anofferor
alreadyin
contror
of
the
conpany whose sharesare
the subject
of
the bid
is
usually
consideredto be
a
takeoverbidr
althoughlogicalJ.y
sucha
bid should be caLleda
coneolidation
bid(g).
Tnthis
geport
takeove^ oids,consolidation bids
andpartial
bide
(whatevertbeir
actual
or
potential
result)
are
collbctively
referred
to
as generalbide.
A company whoseshares
are
the subject
of
a
generalbid
is
refemed
to
aethe
offe:--:e conpany.2'
If
a
takeoveris caried
out
ritb
the
supportof
the
directors
of
the'conpany uhose sharesare bid
for
(hereafter
referred
to
as
frth.offeree
companyrr),the
resurt
io for
practical
purpoaessimilar
to
anergerr siace the
undertakingeof
both the
offeror
andthe
offeree(a)
ttris
expresaioa_originated
in
the united
statea, but
is
gaining-2-colnpanies
are
brought underunified control
by the
initiative of
thr:ir
respective boards
of directors.
often,
however,a
takeoverbid
is
resisted
bythe
directors
of
the
offeree
conpany,either
because thr;ywish
to
continue nanagingthe
company themselvesinstead
of
making wayfor
directore
appointed bythe
successfulofferor, or
becausethey
irelievethat
the
considerationoffered
for
the
sharesbid
for is
inadequate andwill
be inproved bythe
offeror
r"n consequenceof their opposition.
In
this
situation
the only
waythe
offeror
cangain control
of
the
offereeconpany
is
by addreseing anoffer
direcil-y
to its
sharehoJ.ders;
theoppoeition
of
the
board precludesa
nerger beingcarried
out.
,-
Tbe considerationoffered
in
connectionyith
a
generalbid
is
either a
cash purchaseprice or
a,nallotment
or
transfer
of
shares orbonds
of
the
offeror.conpanyor
oneof its
associated conpanies,or,:l
conbination
of
suchconsiderations. rf
a
caehbid
is
nade,the
pri:e
offered
is
aLways nore thanthe
current
quotedprice
of
the
shares j.rrqueetion
(if
tUeyare
quoted ona
stock
exchaage) soas
to
induce tberecipients
of
the
bid
to
acceptit
instead
of selling their
shares orrthe stock
exchange.
In
the
caseof
a bid
whichoffers
anallotment
of
new shares
or
bondsror
a
transfer
of
existing
securities,
with
or
wj,thouta
cash oupplementin
exchangefor
the
offeree
conpanyrsshares, the
urarketvalue
of
the
eecurities
offered
plus
the
cash eupplenent(i.r
any)
is
always
higher
thanthe
cur::ent quotedprice
of
the
offereesr
sharesfor
the
samerea6on'
Because thenarket
valueof
securitiee
is prinarily
dependenton
their yield or
the
earningsattributable
to
then,
the
imnediateeffect
of
a bid
valuing the
offeree
companyrs sharesat
nore
tharrtheir
quotedprice
ie to
depressthe
quotedprice
of
the
offeror
coepanyfs own shares,
and'this
haEto
be takeninto
account bythe
personsto
wbomthe bid
:[e addreesed alongwith
morelong-tern
considerationa,
euchas
the
futurrt earnings and grouth proepecteof
both companiee.-t-4'
If
anofferor
companyoffers to alIot
newsecurities
i-n exchangefor
the
offereesr
shares,
the
formof
the
newsecurities
andthe
rights
attachedto
themis
determinedby the
offeror
company, andthe recipients
of
the
bid
andthe
directors
of
the
offeree
company can seer(to
influencethe
termsoffered only
by bargaining an<l,if
necessary,inducing
theofferor to
makea
revised
bid.
Often the newsecurities
offereo
arebondst which
wiII, of
course,give
the offerees
security
for
their-
capital-and ensurea fixed
income,but
wj.ll
deprive
themof
anyriglrt to
yoie
ai,general meetings
of
the offero.r
companyor to
participate
in
any iurureincrease
in
the
valueof its
ordinary
shares.
Becauseofferees are
oftenunwilling
to
exchangetheir existin!
sharesfor
bonds,it
has becomecorunon
for offeror
companiesto offer
convertible
bonds by gener;rJ- brds,the
conversionprice usually
beingcalculated
onthe
assumptionth:rt
theofferor rs ordinary
shareswill rise
considerablyin
value before theright to
convert beiomesexercisabf"(!).
Fromthe'offereesf point
of
view
the
mosteatisfactory kind
of
bid
is
one whichoffers
an inmec,:.ateallotment
of
the
offeror
companytsordinary shares,
for
the
offe;:c,.,: iir€in
noet casesordinary
shareholders themsuluuu(9), andin
comparrnlj rne vaLue and prospectsof their
existing
holdingswith
ordinary
sharesoffered
in
exchange, theyare
comparinglike
with
like,
andare
moreeasily
able b
arrive
at
the
best decision
in their
or.rninterests.
fnbids
for British
companies, however,the
newordinary
shares do not alwayscarry voting
rights
(there
being noprohibition
onthe issue of
non-voting sharesin British
law)
andthe offerees
must then bear i.n mindthat
if
they accept non-voting shares theywill
have noinfluence
over(l)
the
conversion premiumis
often
anover-optimistic
estimateof
thelikely
growthin
the
valueof
the
offerorls
ordinary
shares, and i.sused as
a
meansto
persuadethe offerees
to
accepttte
uia
in
thebelief that
the
estimatewill
provecorrect.
(c) fr a
takeoverbid
is
madefor
lhe
ordinary
sharesof
a
company which has'
issued preference shares,a
simultaneous Uiai"
sometimes maciefor
the pref,erence shares aswell
soas
to
nakethe
companya
wholly-or.rnedsub-sidiary
of
the
offeror.
The considerationoffered
for
the
preference sharesis
invariably
cashor
bondsl
for fiscal
reasonsthe
offeror
company doesnot
issue
new preference shareein
exchaage, andit will
not
issueordinary
shares,carrying
voting
rights, for this
h,ould, increasethe fractir:n
ol llu
equity
capital held
by former shareholdersof
the
offeree
company, andtt^8fi
endangerthe
control
enjoyed bythe
existing majority
sharehoLderst\e
future
oonduotholcL
e
subetantial. of or-4-the
offerorr
oompanyte undertaklng even though th,r3qcven
the
greater
part
of
its
eqrity
shares.5.
the
difficulties of
shareholdersto
whon newsecurities
areoffered
in
exchangefor
their
ebaresinstead
of
a
cashbid
berng madeare
often
eased bytbe
offeror giving
the
shareholders anoption
to
talce cashor
securities,
thoughtbe
amountof
the
cashoffer
is
always less tbanthe
market valueof
the
securitiee.
UnderEritisb
practice
thecash
alternative
is for fiscal
reasons provided bythe
merchant bank.
offered
b1'which represents
the
offeror offering to
purchasethe
securities/trnn
i;heofferorfffifa
sharehoLderof
the
offeree
companyat
a fixed price
if
the,shareholder
notifiee it of his
intention
to
sel1
then bya certarn
date,.The shareholder who wants cash'then accepts
the
offerorrs
bid
anciat
th,esane
tine
acceptethe
nerchant bankrooffer to
buytbe
securities
whichthe
offeror
will
iesueto hin.
Ttrie amangementby the
nerchant bankis
known asunderwriting,
but
it
ehouldnot
be confusedwith
the
und,er-'writiir8 of
an issueof
securities offered
bya
companyto
the
public
for
subecription
in cash.
hftrena bid
is
underwritten,
it io
the
acceptingsbareboLder,
not
the
offeror
conpany, whoreceives
the
caehprice
fron
bbeuadenriting
bank.6.
If
twoor
moreofferor
conpanies nake contemporaneous takeoverbids
for
control
of
a
company,the offerees
wiJ.J,,of
course, wish to accepttbe
bid
wbichie
nost
advantageousto thenselves.
To preservetheir liberty of
choice andto
inducethe
biddersto
revise
tbeir
bidsupwarde
competitivelyl
the offerees
will
defer
accepting anybid
until
l;beLateet poseible
tine
beforethe period
for
acceptiagthe
bids
closes.An
offeree
vrbo acceptsa bid
a6 soon aeit is
nade therebycontracts
totransfer hio
obaresat
the
price offered,
and be cannotretract
his
acceptance
if
a
more favonrablebid
is
nade by anotherofferor.
On the-2-absoLutely, because
the
offer
documentwill
expressly nakethe
offer
to aoquirethe
offereers
sharesconditional
on acceptanceof
the
bid
bythe
holdersof at
least
!1
per cent,
or
?5per centr
or
9oper
centof
the
sharesheld
byall
the
offerees
(depending onthe
degreeof
control
the
offeror requires),
or
suchsnaller
percentageas the
offeror
is willing to take. rf
a
subsequent, nore favourablebid
is
madesuccessfully
by anotherofferorr
the
first offeror will in
reliance
onthis
condition decline
to
take anyof
the
sharesin
respectof
whichit
has received acceptances,
but
the
offeree
who has acceptedthe
first
bidtoo
early
cannotsafely
acceptthe
later
oneuntil
the
first
offeror
witbdraws,for
by acceptingthe
later bid
the offeree
nay commit hj.nrselfto
transfer
trcicethe
amountof his
holding,
and so nay make himselfLiable
in
danagesfor
breachof
contract
to
oneor
other
offeror.
Thisis
becausethe
acceptanceof
a bid
createsa
binding
contract
betrn,cnthe accepting ohareholder and
the
off,eror,
andrpt merelythe
poosibility
of
sucha
contract
coninginto
existencein
the future
if
neither
party hasresiled fron
it
beforethe condition
as
to
the
nuraberof
acceptanceshas been
fulfilled(d).
7.
rn
theorya
generalbid
could, be madefor
the
convertible
bondsof
anofferoo
conpanylnstead
of, or in
addition
to, its
shares caryyingvoting
rights.
If
the
bid
were successful asa
takeoverbid,
the
offeror
coopany would convert
the
bondsinto
shares camyingvoting
rights
andexercise
control
overthe
offeree
conpany by aggregating those votingrights
with
the voting
rights
attachedto
shares alreadyheid
byit.
Atakeover
in
sucha
forrn hasnot
yet
been attemptedin
anyof the
memberstates,
but
neverthelessis
a practical
possibility.
(d)Wv.I.R.C...|lge.t]]arrE.R.11OB;Ug6,zJCh.375'where
tir"@rt
iffiEded.
rn
French lawthe
contraccfor
I
sale
of
the
sharesis
effective
irnnediately,nder
art.
15gJor
tneCivil
Code,but
subject
to
a
suspensivecondition
sofar.as
the
offerorre
obrigations are
concerned,. rn
Germanlaw
the contract
created. by an
-O-8.
In
France generalbids
for
the
sharesof
companies rvhich .ha.ye aI
stock exchange quotation
or
whose whose sharesare
dealt
in
ona
s b,ockexchange
are
reguJ.ated by J.aw, andin
Belgiun and Lr::cenbourgbids
:tor quoted and unquoted sharesor
bondsof
public
companiesare simila::ly
regulated. In
Franeethe
relevant
legislation
comprisesthe
Arr6r;esministeriels
of
21 January 19ZOt 22 February 1g?Z and5 ltarch
't923, bywhich
the
Minister
of
Economics andFinancial
Affairs
addedarticlers
58to
95to
Title rr of
the
R8slement g6n6ra1 dera
cor,rpagnie des .: qentsd.e change, and
this
legislation
has been supplemented bythe
D6cision g6n6rareof
the
comnission des op6rationp de Bourse dated 1J January1970
establishing
a
codeof
good conductto
be observed byparties
to
bidsand
their
agents, which,despite
its
name,is
supported by 1egal sanction6..rn Belgium takeover
bids are
governed bythe
Arr6t6
royal"sur
le
contrdj,g des banquesof
9th
JuIy
19j5,
article
26of
which was amendedby the
Lawof loth
June 1961+ 60 aato
extendthe
powereit
confened
onthe
govern-nent appointed supervisory
authority,
the
Corucission Bancaire,in
r:spect
of
new issuesof
shares and bondsto
enableit to
deal
with
all
kinrls
of
general bide asweIl. In
Luxenbourgthe
correspondinglegislation is
the
Arr6t6 ducaL conct
les
on6 de banqueet
decrr:dit
of
19 June 1955.9.
In
ltaly
andthe
Netherlands generalbids
are
regulated
by cgdesof
conduct which donot
havethe
force
of
Lau, but
are
enforced onl1. byprofeseionar
sanctions.
Therelevant
codeof
conductin
rtaly(9)
u,"uissued by
the
Milan Stock &<changein
Decenber 19?1, andapplies only
to conpanies whoee shareeare
quotedor
dealt
in
onthat
exchange, althoughit
also
establisheoa pattern
of
conduct which courd be adheredto
bybrokers who
are
rnembersof
other
exchanges and by conpanies whose sbares-7-are
either
quoted onother
stock
exchangesor
are
not
quotedat all.
1
rn
the
Netherlandsthe Social
and, Economi-cCouncil
(a
bodywith
semi-'
in
respect of #eqnoscso&Stnilrless(dt*soeee€&rbso,:laxi,{*t&c.6k>c-ibignr:,lltedxpap<.
:osepoofuo& Mergers and rakeovers on 25tb June
,gZr$-)
Theserules
applyto
generalbids
for
sharesof
companies whicbare
quotedor
regularly
dealt
in
ona
Dutchstock
exchange, andthe
rules
extendto
the
parties
to
the
bid
andtheir
agents.10'
fhe
United Kingdorn law andpractice
in
respectof
takeover aedother bids
ie
contai.nedpartly in legislation,
namelythe
preventionof
Fraud (rnvestnents)Act,
1958, and regulaticins made underit, anu:;rtly
in
the
rules
of
the
United Kingdom Stock Exchange andin
the
City
codeon Takeovere and Mergere, both
of
whichare
reinforced
by professionaland rnoral sanctions
but
which donot forn part
of
the
1aw. In fact
theacope
of
the
British legislation is
quite
narroh/rsince
it
applies
onryto
bids made byor
through personsother
than membersof
the
UnitedKingdon Stock bcchange and
the leading
merchant banks,in
other
words,to
bids
made byoutside
brokersor
byofferor
companiesdirect,
anclthese
are
rare-
fhe stock
xxchangerules,
onthe other
hand,appiy
toall
quoted companies byor for
which generalbids are
made, andtire
city
code
applies
to all
generalbids,
whethertbe
offeror or
offeree
companieshave
a
quotation
for their
sharesor not,
but
not
to
bids
for
the
siraresof
private
companies.11.
Thereis
nolegislation or
professionalin
respectof
takeoverbids
in
Germany, frelandforner
Dublin and Corkstock
exchanges now formor
other
cociesof
coriductor
Denmark,but
thepart
of
the
United Kingdom(!)
n
vanFusies,
@grnemingen-ei nbaare Biedin n.Ged
-8-stbck Exchange, and
bids
in
respectof
companies quoted, on them aretherofore subject
to
the
rules
of,the
Stock Eocehange ancltirc Oity
C,rrto
'--on Takeovers and Mergers.
12'
Thereis litt1e
published comparativematerial
onthe
regul:rtionof
takeover andother bids
underthe
Law andpractice
of
the
memberstates
of
the Europeancomrnunities.
rt wi1l,
therefore,
be usefuL toexarnine
the existing
law andpractice
in
somedetail
before going or.to
establish
what commonfeatures the
existing national
systems contair: an4proposing steps
for their
harmonisation.. British
law andpractice
is
undoubtedJ.y the
nost
developedin this field
becauseof
the
longerexperience
of
takeover andother
bids
in
tbe
united Kingdonc.
rt will,
therefore,
be exa.niniedfirst.
13-
A generarbid
is
arways made by meansof
anoffer
documeni,identical
copiesof
whichare sent
to
the
shareholdersto
whomthe
oi.feris
addressed-
fhe
offer
docunentis
not a
pro.pectus,
evenif it
proposes
that
the
offeror
conpanyshall
issue
new sharesor
bonds to. theofferees
in
exchangefor their
sh,ares,for
a
documentis
a
prospectus onlyif it
offers
new.sharesor
bondsfor
subscription
in
".uu(&]
consequently,the
offer
document neednot
contain the
infornation
required
in
a
pro,spec-tus
bythe
contrnniesActr
1948, andthe
proced.urarrures
in
the
Act
relating
to
the
registration
andpublication
of
prospectuses and the treatmentof
applications
for
sharesor
bonds nadein
response to
(e)
@
other
securities
rnvestmentco.
Ltd.
v.
?
-9-prospectuses do
not
app1y.
Nevertheress, anoffer
documentis
aninvitation to
the
shareholdersto
whourit is
addressedto
disposeof
thoir
sharoe, and oince copiesof
it in
identical
fonnare
circulatod
to
them,the
docurnentfalls
within
the
statutory regulation
of
invest-nent
circulars
inposedby
the
Preventionof
Fraud (Investments) Act,1L'l
1958':!'.
Consequently, copiesof
the
offer
docurnent can besent
outonly
bya
nemberof
the
United Kingdom Stock Exchangeor
bya
rnemberof
an
association
of
security
dealers recognised bythe
Departmentof
trade andIndustry,
or
bya
dealer
in
securities
licensed
or
exempted fromor
licensing
bythe
Department(i]o.
by the.offeror
conpanyitself/vrith
thepermiseion
of
the
Oepartnent(il In
practice
offer
docunentsare
alnost alwayssent
out
by merchant banks which are.exempteddealers,
or
bystockbrokers who
are
nenbersof
the
Uaited Kingd.om Stock Exchange sothat
occasionsrarely arise
whenthe
offeror
nust
seekthe
Departmcntof
Tradefe approvalfor
the
conmunicationof
a bid
to
the
offerees.14.
'
'Regulations made underthe
Preventionof
Fraud (fnvestments) Act, 1958,specify
the inforrnation
whicb must be includedin offer
documentscirculated
in
connectionwith
takeoverbids
a.ndin
recomrnendations to accept takeoverbids sent
out
bydirectors
of
the
offeree
""rp.r,y(5]
For
the
purposeof
theseregulations
a
takeoverbid
is
defined as anoffer
madeto
twoor
more holdersof
sharesor
bondsof
the
offeree(h)
preventionof
Fraud (Investments)Act,
1958,s.14 (1).
(D I
licensed dealer
is
a
dealer
in
securities
whois
not a
menberof
arecognised
stock
exchangeor
association
of
deaLersin
securities
andwho
therefore requires
a
governmentlicence
to
carry
onbusiness.
Anexempted
dealer
is
one which would normallyrequire
sucha licence,
butbecause
its
businessis
primarily not
concernedwith
dealing
in
securities
it is
granted exenptionfron
havingto
appryfor
a
licence.
l{ostmerchant banksr insurance companies and investment
trust
compar.les are exempted dealers.(;i*) Prevention
of
Fraud (Investments)Act,
1958,s. t4 (J) (i)
ana(ii).
(k)
Licensed Dealers (conductof
Business) Rul-es,
1950,paras.
I (d),
3-'io-company which
is
calculated
to result in
any personacquirin5 contr,rl
of that
companyr andcontrol
is
definedas
direct or
j.ndircct
contrrrlover
the
majority
of
the
votes which may becast
at
general meeti.n6r;of
the offeree
company,leaving
out
of
accountvotin6
rights
r,rhich nay beexercised,
only
in
specified contingen"iu"(I)rl"respcct
of
specified
1-\ 1- \business
ta' \gi
Anoffer
documentis
therefore
not subject
to
therregulations
if it is
issued by anofferor
conpany which already holcisshares
of
the
offr-'r'ec c()ncpanycarrying voting
control,
andthe
purpc,seof
the
offer is
to
acquire the
remaining sharesor
thoseof
unern which'carry voting
rights (i.e.
a
consolidation
bid).
Sucha
documenr rs neverthelesa arlinvestnent
cirular,
andthe
restrictions
onits
cistribu-tion dealt with
in
the
precedingparagraph
apply.15-
Theregulations
in
respectof
takeoverbids.apply
in
taw onlyto
circuLars
issued by dealersin
securities
licensed
underthe
prcvantionof
Fraud (fnvestnents)Act, 19j8(g]
Neverthel"ess,the
Department o,[Trade arid
fndustry requires the
regulations
to
be observeo asa
cond:Ltionof
giving
its
consentto
the circulation
of offer
docurnent,s by persorisother
than licensed and exempted dealers and membersof
the
unitedKingdon Stock Exchange
or
recognisedassociations
of
security
dealerri,and persone
in
theselast
twocategories
do conformto
the
regulatic,nsvoluntarily.
Moreover,the
Stock Exchangerequires
that offer
docurentsissued by
a
quoted conpanyror in
connectionwith a bid
for
the
sharesor
debenturesof
a
quoted conpany, shourdcontain
substantially
thesane
information
as anoffer
docurnent issued bya
licensed
clealu.(P]
Theresult
io
that
offer
docurnentsare
standardin forn,
by whorosoever issudd.(!)
E-g.
voting
rights
exercisable by preference shareholdersonly
if
" preference dividend
is in
amear.(m)
E.g- voting
rights
exercisable by preferencesharehord.ers onry on
resolutions
affecting
their
rights
as such.(g)
t:.censed-Dealere (conauctof
Bisiness)-R;1;,,
1g6ot
para.
1g(1).
\g/
'rneregulatlons
were made unders.7
(;) of
the
Act,
nhicb, extendo only
to
licensed dealers.(g)
Admissiolof
securities
to i,ig!i*g.,
chapterJ,
paras.
1 andJ,
flrer stockic:ccirange.or@thou!httreuia,ifsuccessfu1,wiILnot
-11-An
offer
documentsubject
to
the regulations
in
respectof
takeover
bids
must:- (a)
set out
the
mostrecent
middle market quotati.on
of
the
sharesor
other
securities bid
for if
theyare
quoted ona
stock exchanger togetherwith
at
least
six
other
such quotationsover the
last
six
montbs' andif
the
offeror offers
sharesor
bondsof
another companyin
exchange,siroirar infornation
in
respectof
thosesecurities;
(u)
ir
the
securities bid
for or
offered
in
exchange
are
not
quoted on astock
exchange,set out
at
l-eastsix
prices
at
whichthe
securities
have been sordduring the
precedingeix
months soas
to
give
a
fair
viewof
fluctuations
in
price
during
that
periodi (c)
state
that
the
offer is
open
for
acceptancefor at least
twenty-one daysr. andif it is
conditional
on
acceptance by
the holders
of
a certdin
ninimurn numberof
the securities
bid
for, it
nust
also specify
whatthat
minirnu.mis
andthe
lateot
dateby whi.ch
the
offeror
naydeclare the
offer
unconditional and bindrn6;(d)
aisctose the description
and amountof
anysecurities
already held
by
the
offeror or
$y nomineesfor
the
offeror in
the
offeree
company;(e)
aisclose
any patrrunentsor
benefits
to
begiven
to
anydirector
of
the
offeree
conpany aE compensationfor
loss
of office or in
consideratlonof his
retirement
fron
officer
andthe
offer
documentnust
also
revealvhether any
other
agreenentor
amangement nadewith
any suchdirector
is
coaditionaL onthe
offer
being accepted,or
acceptedto
a
certain
e'xtentl (f)
state
whatforn
the
considerationfor
the transfer
of
thesecurities bid
f'or
will
take andwithin
whatperiod
it wilL
be received by persons who acceptthe
bid; (g)
disctose
whetherthe
offeror is
awareof
anymaterial
changein
the
finauciaL
position
of
the
offeree
company,or
the
company whosesecurities are offered
in
exchangefor
securities of
the
offeree
conpany;since the
dateof their latest
annual accounts;(h) set out
the
saneinfornation
about any conpany whosesecurities
areoffered
in
exchangefo1 the securities bid
for
as would, be requiredin
aprospectue issued by
that
co&palryror
alternatively, if
the
securities
15.
I
r\-
-12-offered are
unquoted,give
information
aboutthat
companyrs author:Lsedand issued share
capital
andtho
classesinto
whichit is
ciividciin aboutissues
of its
sharessince
tbe
endof its last financial
year,
abrrrt reorganisationsof its
capital
during
its last
twofinanciai
ye*rs,
about
its
loan
capital
andits
directors
and, whetherthe
securities
ofie,redin
exchangeare
quotedor
unquoted;
the
amountof
the
cornpanyrsprofits
or
l-osses andthe
rates
and. anountsof its
divrdenddistribuuionu
rneach
of its
three
precedingfinancial
years;
and(i) either
be iiccomp_
anied by copies
of
the
memorandum,articles
andlast
annual accountsof
alry conpany whose
securities
are
offered
in
exchangefor
thosebia
for,
or
offer
inspection
of
those documentsat
a ,convenient time and or -.,ru (g]No takeover
bid
may be madeconditionar
onthe
offeregs
consentia;; todirectors
of their
companyreceiving
payrnentsor
benefj.tsas
comrcnr;ation
for
loss
of office or in
considerationof
""ti"urunt(IJ
rf
the
ofl.errelates
to
only
part
of
the
issuedsecurities
of
the class
in
quesiion,it
must nevertheless be nadeto
a1l
the liulders
of
securities
of
that
crass,
andif
acceptancesare
receivedin
respectof
moresecurities
than the numberbid
for,
there
must beprovision
for
scaring
down the
acceptances
rateably so
that
no acceptingofferees
are
treated,
r.)
preferentially'1.
17'
The terrnsof
a
takeoverbid
must be communicatedto
the
dire<:torsof
the
offeree
companyat least
three crear
days beforeit is
despat<;hed
rr+\
to
the
offerees'3j rf
the
directors
senda
recornnenriationto
the persons
to
whomthe
bid
is
addressedto
acceptit,
they
nust
also
disclose the amountof their
ohrn hord.ingsin
the
offeror
and
offeree
conpanies;whetber they
intend
to
acceptthe
offer in
respectof their
own hoiriings;_.t
(g)
me
Licensed Dearers (conductof
Businees) Rules,