;#,";ffi;
tr:'it'l''..i
j
'. !1:aveaus
de
Ia
rloyeuee EntrrfeBrussels
4Ielephoae
35,Oo.4OOTTICIAI SPOTSSMAN
of
the
Conm:Lssion:;
f
F,O
ir,:
[i
Fil
I
H,. tl'r;
Brussels; .ruly
1956g-35
INFonMATI0N ttPMO
M4$.POqER pROBr,Ir{S
,IN
rtsE COMMUNTTY ,rN 19dtsfhe
EEt
Coruaissionhas
adoptedLts
seventh
Annual Reporton nanpower problems
ia
the
Connunity, In
conpiling
tbis
report
the
Cornmissionhas
continued
to
apply the
nethod
of
previous
year6
by
enlisting
the
help
of
economicexperts
andexperte
fromthe
Minietriee
of
Labour
of
the
MemberStateo. In
additiont
it
has
consulted
the
WorkingParty
of
the
A,dvlsory Conudtteelastituted
by Regulatlon No. 38/64,
which
includes
Governnentrepreaentatives
andrepresentatives
of
workerst
andenployersl
, organizatione.
The
report
takeEaccount
of
the
opinlons
of alL
theser
andconsiste
of
three
parts,
The
firet part
deal-swith
the
developnent
of
the
Labournarket
in
the
six
MenberStatee,
describec general
trends,
and anaS-ysesthe
sl-tuation by
branch
of activity,
country
andregion.
In
the
Conmunityas a whole,
expansloncontinued
in
I965t
but
at
a
sLowerrate
than
in
the
prevlous
year.
ThetotaL
of unfilled
vacancies tended
to
lncrease: the totaL
numberof
applications
for
enplolrnent and
of
unenployedalso
increased.,
though moreappreciably
at
the
be6inning
of
L955than
at
the
end.
As hadbeen
foreseen,
Germanyand,
to
a Lesser
extentr
the
Netherlandswere
the
countries
in
which
great
shortages
of
Labourpersisted.
In
Gernanythe
numberof
unenpLoyedfelL to
an
erctremeLy 1owleveLl
andin
the Netherlands, deepite
a
elight
increase
in
that
nunbert
the
gap betweenreguireneats
andreeourcea
of
manpowerrenained.
great. fn
tuxenboufg,
full-
employment waemaintained.
It
wasi.n
Italy that
the
Lncreasein
availabLe
manpower wasnost
markedl
owingto
the
slowdownof
economic expansionthere.
In
France,
applJ.catioas
for
enpLoyment and unempS-oymentfigures
both j"ncreased.
In
Belgiual
too,
the
falLing-off in
expanolonbrought
with
lt
a
sllght
tendency
to
easing
of
the
situatlon,
In
the
secondpart of
the
report,
prospects
of
economicdevelopment and
of
enploynent
tor
1965are
indlcated
for
each MemberState.
ThLepart
contains forecastF
of
manpowerrequire-ments and
resources.
Accountl.e taken,
in particular,
of
expansion
of
production;
increaeed
output per
sorker,
and expected changesin
the volune
andpattern
of
paid.empLoynent.
In
1965econonlc
expanslonin
the
Communitynight
epeedup
sllghtly,
but
without
caueing
eubstantial
changesin
the
labour
eituation.
Strains
wilL persist,
especiaLly
tn
Germany, tuxernbourg and the1 i".t.: ';-i ..4:t
-2*
ln
the
Lnbalanceals
not
lnposslble. In
france
'anclltalyt
LncreasedproductLon
could
be
accompanietlby
an
Lnprovement Lnproductivity rather
than
by
dn
increaee
in
nunbera enployedtespecially
at
the
begLnntngof L956.
Neverthelesst
uneilploynentfiguroe
rrylLlprobably
f,all in
these two
countries. In
Belgiunl
though, they
nd.ghtrise
eJ.ightly.
The
third part of
the
report
highLights the
nanpon'erprobJ.ens
stilL
confronting
the
MemberStates. In
nost
of
thenconsiderabl-e
lnbalances exLst
between nanpowerrequirements
andr€Eoore€61
a6
regards both
nun'bers andtypes
of
workers.
Tbisfact
enphasizeetbe
Lnportance
of
nanpowerto
maintenanoeof
balanced
econom{c expansj-On,arjL the inportance
of
the
measures.taken
or
envisagedin
order-tc
ensure
euitable
trainLng
and optinu!0use
of all,
avaLlabLeworkers.
Ana3-yslsqf
these ileasures reveals
not
only.the{r
diversLty
but
a.lso
the
concern Fhownby
eachof
theMenber Governments
to
glve
thea
theJ.r
right
place
in
a
coherent economic andsocial policy.,
Irinal}y1 the
report
containelnfornatlon
.and suggestLonoresarding
colLaboratj.on
at
ConrmunityLevel,
eepeoially
in
the
conparison
andharnonization of
statistics,
vocational" guidan;e,
vocatlonal trainLngr
and thenediun-t€rm
economic devel-opment programme'Id
the
refefence
months'(end
of April
and endof
October1965),
the
totaL
nuuber
of unfllled
vadanclee
in
the
Connunityroee
to
nearly
8rO OOOunj.ts,
breakfng-the record
reachedat
thejF,qqe
tLne
in
the
prevlouo
ye.ar
(about
8OC ooOunits).
i
Thetotal
nunbereof
unsatisfled applications
for
enploy-'mentand
of
unenployedalso
showeda
tendencyto
increase,
espeoiaLS.y J.n
the
fLret
quarter
otr 1965. Ona year-toJyear
basis
the
nwber
of
unenployedln
the
Conuunlty
grewby nearly
'148 o0o
at
the
end of
,April
(s.1".7o67, andby
2l
ooo
(on3-y 3..9%)at
;ihe
endof
October
L965.. fhese
figuree
showthe
trend
tovrardsequilibrluu that
took place during
the
secondquarter
of
1965.In
Gerndriy,
aeiirana continued.buoyint
right
'into
the* autunn, s'othat
the very
acute
strains
on
the
labour narket
werefurther
a68ravated. At
the
endof
S.ep!gn!er. L965thg
numberof
uiienployed, 85 ooo,'wae
iE
ooo].eei
than a year
earlier!
theunemploynent
rate
was Do glorethau
O.t6
of,
thp,aetlvo
sage-earning.
popu3-ation.
At
tbe.p?pe
tine
the
nuuber
of. vaoerrciesrose
to
7OO OOOr
a. f,€co?dfor
.this
period
of
the
f€,Err. . ,Ae
a
resuLt
of
the
expecte.d sLpgt<enfng-9f expangionr.overall
uanpowqr probLens
night
lessen
sltghtly ln 1956.
fioweversthere
are
bJ-gnsthat
the
strains
on
the.labour narket
night persfst
in
general',
and
even gro$t wotge th?tl,Ln
L965ln
gertain
branches.The,slower
increaee
in
the nunber'of
wage-earnerels
one elenentJuotifying
sucha
hypothesLsr
.-3-average
3o
2oo Xn 1964 and]4
8ooin
L965)
couLdincrease
further
in 1966.
The unenpLoynentrate
(nunber
of
unenployedin
relation
to
active
popuJ-atiot)
night
be
around 1%fu
1955, as against
A.*o
Ln
1-965 and 0.8%tn 1964'
A1Lin
a1-3.,the
expectediacrease
in
nuuaber
of
workers
in
L956night
be
of
the
ordet
ot
6J
0OO ascompared
with
about
68 o0Oln
L965.In
Luxenbourg,the
procpects
for industrial
expaneion
, ln
particular in
the
coaL andsteel
induatries, indicate
no
appreclable
change
on
the
l-abourmarket. Fu}l
enployment hae beenvirtual.}y
assured
for
several years
past.
Foreign
workers
nowforn
3C/oof
the
wage-earnlng popul-ation.fn
BeLgium,the
numberof
registered
ful1y
unenployedr
wbichgrew
fron
L964to
Lg65but
on3.yto
a
llnlted
extent
(about 5
OOOunits), nlght
continue
to
increase
slightl-y
ln 1966.
Thenunber
of
wage-earnersr
which
grewby
about
,O
OOgpersons
Ln
19651 mlghtincrease by another
28
OO0or
60 l"n
1966.
Thenoet
i.nrportant causeaof this rise wil].
be
the transfer
of
self-enployed
workersto
the
salary-
and, wage-earningcategory,
and perhapsan lncrease
in
the
numbefof
women enp3.oyecl.In
France, as
ls
norual
in
a
period
of
econonic
reviva3-, expanslonwill
doubtLessresuJ,t
in
increased
productlvity
at first.
The
growth
of activity,
however,night
be
nore eoderate:
to
begin withrbSranlncreaeeLn
the
numberof
hours
workedand
only Later
j.n
theyear
by
a
further
perceptible
increaee
in
the
nunber-of
people.lnproyiar
Thetotal of
wage-earnersnig'ht
rise in
1966by
Q.5%,i.e.
by
70
0OOpersons,
with
notabJ.edifferences
in
trend
between thevarious
sectors.
Nearly
IOO 0OOpeople
cboulclbe leaving
agtj.cultre.
In
a1L,
the
j.ncreasein
paid
workers
j.n
the non-aSricultural
sectors
night
be
18O OOosi.e.
L.4%.In ltaly,
the
total
numberof
enployed
shouLdbe
virtually
the
sanein
1966as
in ]-965.
Owingto
the
revlval
of,
act5,v!.tythe
numberof
unenrployednlght
deoline
somewhat;
but thte
le
not
certain.
.According
to
a
recent
estimatel
ltal-ian
manpoweflikel-y
to
be
avaiLabLefor
work
in
the
other
MesbenStates
in
1966 amountsto
20O 00Ounits,
nad.eup as followsr
Of
which;tradesnen and
craftsmenAgricu3-ture
MetaL
procluctlon
andnetal.
workingConetructLon
Other
occupations
in
industry
andtraneport
[rade
Services
UnekiLLed
labourere
LL
ooo200 000
2
000to
ooo25
OOOL4
0002
000I
500ao
ooo5o
oooe'
ooo4
0002
0008o
oooe.r,E
pomfAnoLE
dc lo Good*loe
'
eat.
POf,TAVOCC drltc €omlrdonr
Eg.G,
W@RDVOERDSR wil d. Coinbtt
Brtrxellesr
Julllet
L965P-35
NqFE; p lryFo$q$,rrgN
tffi
PROBLEMES DS L/i t{AI$-D'0gUmtr DANS LiIco!{Mr,lrAlnE
n[
196
ta
C,omnieeion dela
C@vient
d.'ad,opter Borrrapport
annuel- le
?tsme dela
s6rie,-
sur leg
problines
d.eta
main-df oeuvre clanela
Comnunaut6. Reprenant}a
m6thod.eutiliede
lee
anndes pr6cdd.entesla
Connriesionsrest
asgurdele
ooncoursclfexperts en conjonctrrre
et
d,texperts desrninistbres
duTrarrail
d,esEtats
membreslon
outre,
elle
a
consul.tdles
membres du Groupe detravail
du Comit6consultatif
institu6
par
le
Rlglement no38/64qtri
cornprend. d.ee reprdsentants gouvernementau:ret
d.es reprdeentants d.ee organisatione profeesionnelles d.etravailleurs et
d,fom-ployeurs.
Le
rapport
tient
compte clescontributions
d"es expertset
des membres d.u*oupe
-:,-;Xll;"'l,llllT:+rH:iiil:t;:,"""ne
ae
i,enproi
dabslee
six
Etate;d.€gage
les
tend.ances g6n6raleeet
analyeela
situation
par
branchedtaotivit6r
Parpays'et par
rdgion.,Dang lrensemble d.e La Communaut€, ltexpaReionsfest
porrsuivie
en 116)1maie
i,
un
taur
moins 6]evd qpe ltann€e'pr6cddente. Autotal,
1evolwe
des
offree
drempl.oi non saf,isf,aitosa
marEr6 r.ue tendancecroiseante;
celui
desdemand.eg dremploi
et
celEi
dee cb6meulsont
6galoment progresed d.e fagontoutefois
plus
senslble au ddbut de1p6l
quti Ia
fin.
Ainsi $r'11
ava.it 6t6
prdvuscrest
6ur-tout.en
Allenragneet,
d.ans une moindre nesure ar.r:c Pays-Bas, qus d.efortee
pdnr:riescle
travailleure
ont
persigtd.
DangIe
premier de ces deur paye,le
Dombre desper-Eonnes sqns cmploi
est
tom'b6i
un niveau ertr6neunent baset,
daneIe
segond.r bien quron constate rure L6gEre augmentation d.es ch6neursrltdoart
entre
les
bgsoineet
1eg ressqurces on main-dtoeuwe
reste
toujorge
trbe
.inportant.
Au Lu:cembourgrla
sitir,ation
eet
caractdrisdepar
19naintion
duplein
emploi.Crest
enltaLie
que lracctroiseement d.esitiepgnibtlit6E
d.e rnairr-dtoeuvre a6t6
le
plue
seaeible,
coqui
traduit
les effets
d.ela
dirninution du rythtttedfex-pansion dans ce
pays. &r
Franc€, ona
enregietr6
6gal,ement uno augmentati.on d.esd.emand.es d'empLoi
et
clu cb6mage.&l
Belg:igue,auesir,le
fldchissement de I'expansiona
einttain6 urre 16g6re. tondanoe A.la d6tente.
,Dans sa d.euxiEme
partie,
}e
rapport
'ind.igue pour ohaguelltat
nembre deeperspectiveE d.f€volution €conomique
et
d[!omploi pour 1956;i]
contiert'certainesestirnationg pr6vi.eionnelles.d.es besoins. et. rleg reeEources en main-droeuvre.
Cellee-oi
tiennent
corrpte nota,runent de 1te:cpa^neion clela
prod.uction, dee progrBe dela
production
par salari6
et.d,es.changemente escompt6s dangle
volurneet
dans }astructure
d,oItemploi
ealari6.
fu'Lg66t.Itexpansion.6conomiquepourrait
ldgbrement,''
stace6l6rer
danela
Corosuurautd ssnsentralner toutefois
deemodifioationg
eubstan-tielles
dela
situation sur
Le marchd de1tenploi. Celui-ci r6stera
encore tendu,ldgbre
attdnuation
cl.ee dds€quillbresnfest
cependant pasexclus,
?rlt Franceet
enItalie,
les
progriE
de La productionpourraient
staccompagner,surtout
au d6but cle1!66,
drune andLioration d.ela
productivit6
plut6t
que dfune augnentation deltemploi.
Cependant, dans cee d.eux ps;rsrIe
ch6mage dimlnuera probablement. Parcontre,
en Belglqueril
pourrait
marquer unl6gar
accroies€ment.La
tioieibme
partie
durapport
souligneles
problOmes de ha main-dtoeqvreqtri
restent
poeds ausix iltats.
Danela
pLupartdtentre
eux,
des dds€guilibres importantssubsistont entre
les
besoineof
loe
reesources err rnain-clroeuw'etant
sur
Ie
plan
gualitatif
queErantitatif.
Cefait
souligneltimportance
dcsproblb-mee drempLoi au r'agard. du maintl.en dturre e:cpansion
6qrrilibr6e
of
renforoe
irint6-rdt
d.es nesures appligrrdes ou onvisag6es dansIe
but
dfagsurer unegualification
appropride
et
uneutilieation
optimale del
reneernble destraviailleure
dlsponiblee. Irtanalyse d,e ces mesureefait
reseortir,
outre
leur
d.iversit€,
).esouci
c1e chacund.eo gouvernernents d.e
lee
ine€ror
&,Ier:r juste
place
dans unepolitiEre
dconomiqueet
sociale
cohdrente.te
rapport
eontient onfin
rurccrtain
nombre cltinformationeet
d"e suggestionsrelatives
i.
la
oollaboration
comrnunautaire, enparticulier
eurles points
suirrants: comparaisonet
ha,tmonisatioa clee donn€esstatistiguesl
orien-tation
professionnelle;
forrnation professiorurello;
programme d.e d6veloppement 6oonomiquei,
mo;1en terme.LES qolrNsirs cFr-gFREE l,Es tjr,uF s.rffirqrc&qr.v&s
Lo nombre
total
dcsoffrge,4tenrloi
nonsatisfaitee
rlans La Corununautdsrest
61ev6 aux mois tlerdf6renaelfln
a'rri}
et
fin
octobre 1965)i'
prbs de830.000 rmitdsrd.€passant
lo
record.atteint
Lrann€e prdc6clente aux m€mes d,atee(environ 8oO.O0O
unit6o).
Le nombre d.ee d.ornand.es d.romploi non
gatisfaites
et
celui
des ch6meursont
6galement eu tend.ance b.'augmenter,surtout
ar,tprenier
senestre.
Autotal,
pourla
Commwrautd,le
nombre desllggg5g
etegt
accrudrure
ann6ei.
lrautre
d.e prbade 14B.O0O personhes
il
Ia
ffn-dTffi, soit
d.e 11 ,7t1,:,et
d.e 2ll.Ocosoit
d,e 1,9f.seulernent,
i, Ia
fin
dtoctobre 1965. Cescbiffree
rnontrentIe
redressoment opdr6au cours du deuxi&ne eemestre 1965.
trh
Allemaqe,
lrexpansion de La demand.ea 6td
jusgrl'en automnesi
dyna-migtre que 1es tensions iLdji.
tr6e vivos sur
le
march€ delremp}oi
sesont
encoreaggrav€es. A
la fin
septernbrei!5J,
Le nombre d.ee chdneurs (B!.OOO)6tait
inf€-rieur
cle IJ.OOOi, celui
gui
avait
6t6
enregtetr6 un a,rr pLust6t .
Le tan:c d.uchdmage
nt6tait
plus alors
que de OrQfopar rapport
i
ta
populatinn
aotive
d.6pen-d.ante. Eh m€me temps,
le
nombro cles empLois vacantssrest
61ev6a
?00.0001 attei-gna;rtainsi
un niveau record por:rcette
pdriode d.e I f ann6e.&r raison
tlu fLdchissement escomptd d.e lrercpa.nsion,les
problbmes c1emaindfoeu\me
por:rraient
perdre globalenent un peu d.oleur
acti'rj.t6
en 1966. Ce-pend.ant, d.taprbscertains
lnd.ices,
les
tensions 6u?le
marchd d.e 1'ernploipour-raient persister
en g6ndralet
m8me serenforcer
da,ns certa:i"n<,'E h.r:r,r:chespar
rap-port
A, 1965. La progressionplus fai.ble
du nonbro clessalarids
jus'Lifie,
entreautres
6}6mente,pareillo
lgryoth6se.Aux PalS:Eag,
le
nombre d.es ch6meursqui a 6t6
en moyenne annuelle de30.200 en 19611
et
d.e 34.800 en7j6J
pou;rrait,encore augnepten en 1166. Le tauxd.u ch6mage (nombre cles ch6meurs
par ra;;port
&la
poputationactive) pourrait
sesituer
ar.x alentours de L /u en L966,contre
Or9,l
enI!61
et
C..B % enlp5zi.
DansI
lreneenble,
compte tanu de clivere escomptde pour 1$56pourait'6tre
environ en 1955,
Au,Luxembor+re,
les
perspectives d.t€voLution d.eltaotivitd
induetriellet
notamment danEfi?-A6nrgie1
nelaissent entrevoir
aucunemodification
appr6cia-ble
dela
situation sur
Ie
maroh6 d.elfemploi.
Le pLein emploiest
pratiquementassur6 cl,epuis
pluglelrre
anndes.la
proportion
deIa
nrain-dtoeu\re dtrangbre parrapport
a
fa
population ealari$e
totale
atteint
naintenanl
30 f".&e Belgique,
le
nombre d.es ch6moune completscontr6l6s
gui stest
accftlde
1964a
19mig
dane une nesurelirnitde
(environ
de 6.00Orxritdsr:)
poumait.maintenir une tendance l6gErement ctroiesante en
1!56.
Ltemploiealarid gui,e'est
accru en 1965 de 30.O0O personnes environ
poumait sfaccroitre
encore d'e 28.0O0personnea environ-en 1p66, Les
factcurg lee plue
irnportants d.eoet
aocroiesementseront
constitu€s par
le
transfert
d.etrarrailleurs
nonsalari6s b
la
catdgoriod.es
ealari€s
et
dventuellement1'6l6rration
dutaux
d.ractivit6
dss femmos. En France, cotlmei}
est
nornal
on p6riod.e d.erepriee
conjoncturellet
ltexpangiorffiIiora
6ans d,oute d.tabord. d.es progrbs dela
productivit6'
Lrao-croieeelnent d.e
lractivit6
por,lrrait
en revanche€tre
plus
mod'6r6: d'ans lrimmdil'iattalLongement d"e 1a clurde du
travail
et
eoulernentBlus
tard
dans lrann6eprogres-sion
de nouveau eensible clesoffoctifs
occupds. Letotal
desealari6s
pouFait
augmenter
en
L9(,6dtenviron Qri fo,
aoit
d.e TO.0OO personnes,lt6volution
par
sec-teur 6tant
assezd.iff6renoi€e. Lt6migration
nrrale
porterait
enooresur
prbs de1O0.0OO personnes. Au
total,
Itaugmentation d.ela
main-d.roeuvreealari6o
dansIes. eeoteurs non
agriooles
po*""ii
atteinclre
1BO.O0O personnes,soit
L14 f"'Un
ltalie. le
volunetotal
d.e L f emploi ned,ewait
gubre eenoclifietr
en1966
par-;";ilffi; iggi.-ii
sepourrait
qgi&la
faveur
d.e Larepriee d''activit6t
le
nombro d.es ch$meursfl6chiose
gue}guepeuf
cette estination 6tant
toutefois
incertaine.
Drapr6s une
6valutation rdcente, Iee
disponibilitde
de main-d,roeurrreita-lienne susolptible
clr6tre
employ6e on 196b danelos rltate
membres d.ela
Communau-t6
s'61bventa
20O.OOOr:nit6s
autotal,
ser6partissant ainei:
dontl
ournriorsgualifide
etsp6cialisds
facteura,
.Lfaugnentation deltemploi
eaiarid
cte
Lrordre
de 69.0@travailleurg
contre
68.000:l
agriculture
production
et
transformationd.es m6taux
construction
autres
m6tiers del.rinduetrie
et
dGgtnnsports
comm{llca,
servica,s
main-cl 'oeuvre banale
11.o00
20.00CI
60"000
23 "000
{.o0o
4. ooo
-*l{€
2oD.00o
2.000
10"000 25.000
14.000
t"oeo
1"tr00
54.toa