A comparative study of lichtenstein mesh repair vs nonmesh tissue repair desarda’s technique for inguinal hernia repair
Full text
Figure
Related documents
There is no significant difference in duration of surgery, intra operative complication rate, post-operative pain, complications and recurrence, between Desarda’s
A perspective transformation led to what Mezirow (1996:1 des i ed as a more fully developed (more functional) frame of reference. Due to these proposed positive
Aim The aim of the study was to compare the laparoscopic TAPP witch Open lichtenstin Mesh Repair in terms of duration of surgery, post-operative pain, postoperative
Studies have been done comparing Lichtenstein versus tissue free mesh free hernia repair (Desarda repair) which showed Desarda repair is as effective as the standard
Preoperative variables were examined: chief complaints, age, occupation, BMI, addiction, associated illness, type of hernia, reducibility, associated with scrotal
Methods: A prospective analysis and auditing of 120 patients with unilateral inguinal hernia who underwent inguinal hernia surgery by Lichtenstein tension free mesh repair under
Aim of the study was to compare Desarda tissue repair with Lichtenstein mesh repair for treatment of primary inguinal hernia repair at tertiary centre in
Conclusions: This study shows no difference in outcome of results in Lichtenstein tension free hernia repair for indirect inguinal hernia with two different
