Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
1967
A multi-exposure, high resolution camera for the
production of a resolving power test target, with
extended range
Richard Bergen
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Senior Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for
inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact
.
Recommended Citation
A MULT I
-EXPOSURE,
HIGH
RESOLUTION
CAMERA
FOR THE
PRODUCTION OF A
RESOLVING
POWER
TEST
TARGET,
WITH
EXTENDED
RANGE
RICHARD
F.
BERGEN
MAY,
1967
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
1
HYPOTHESIS
2
OBJECTIVE
2
PROCEDURE
AND
RESULTS
3
CONSTRUCTION
CONSIDERATIONS
3
OPERATION
k
OPTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
k
INTERMEDIATES
6
TEST
OBJECT CONSIDERATIONS
7
EVALUATION
8
CAMERA
8
TEST
OBJECT
8
CONCLUSIONS
10
RECOMMENDATIONS
11
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
11
LIST OF
ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure
No.
1
2.
3,
k.
5.
Page
No
7.
8.
9.
10.
11
12,
Table
No.
1
II
I II
Schematic
ofProposed
Camera
Side
view ofHigh
Resolution
Camera
Side
view ofHigh
Resolution
Camera
Top
view ofHigh
Resolution
Camera
Close-up
oftransport
aim against reference screwSteel
plate schematicfor
stationnumber
three
Copies
ofintermediates
in
cameraPrints
from
each stationindependently
High
resolutionresolving
powertest
target
with extended rangePhoto
micrograph oftest
object500X
Photo
micrograph oftest
object200X
Photo
micrograph oftest
object50X
II I
I I I
IV
V
VI
VI I
VI I I
VIM
IX
Resolving
powertest
target
valuesX
Evaluation
of station number threeintermediate
XI
Evaluation
offrom
station number threeXII
ABSTRACT
Since
1888,
a series ofmutually
perpendicularlines
have
been
used as a
test
objectfor
evaluation ofoptics,
systems,
products,
V
(etcJ'l'
The availability
of suchtest
objectshas
traditionally
been
in
the
frequency
range of about one cycle per millimeter to a couple- H<->)
^X6x^
C
hundred
cycles per millimeter.These
have
been
availablefrom
afew
manufacturers,
none of which offersthe
extended range of .25 cyclesper millimeter
to
greaterthan
onethousand
cycles per millimeter'
X
K-iTfjl
H2ESSfiiIi-
t+iF
s project.The
usefulness of such an extended rangeserves
to
makeit
an all-purposetest
target
for
measurement of enlarging,
contact and reduction systems.Since
the
test
objectis
onfilm,
it
canbe
used with easein
each ofthese
systems.The
actualtest
object range obtained wasfrom
.25 cycles per millimeterto
greater
than
one thousand cycles per millimeter.The
camera attainedthis
by
a simplebut
effectivethree
station,
multi-exposure qiejhpa.^>-^..*..FE6
"
The
advantage of such an exposure methodis
that
optimumindependent
line
width control canbe
used at each exposure step.Breaking
the
total
frequency
rangeinto
three
groups eases exposure and opticalrestrictions
but
does
produce mechanical registration problems.It
is
obviousthat
with a reasonablebudget
asturdier,
higher
precision and more reproducible
instrument
couldbe
built
suchthat
this
extended rangeresolving
powertest
target
couldbe
produced onHYPOTHESIS
Is
it
possibleto
make ahigh
resolution camera which employs athree
station,
multi-exposure methodthat
willbe
capable ofproducing
a
high
resolutionresolving
powertest
object of extended range?OBJECTIVES
1.
To
construct ahigh
resolution cameraincorporating
athree
stagemulti-exposing
method andhaving
the
necessary
associated mechanicaland optical systems.
2.
To
producethe
glass plates andfilm
intermediates
requiredby
the
camera.
3-
To
makefrom
the
camera ahigh
resolutionresolving
powertest
object on
film
with afrequency
rangefrom
.25 cycles per millimeterto
greaterthan
one thousand cycles per millimeter.PROCEDURES AND
RESULTS
(2
3
k)
There
have
been many
schemesfor
making
varioustest
objects. ' '(c)
High
resolution camerahave
alsobeen
built.
This
offers anotherpossible method of
making
resolving
powertest
targets
but
with an extendedrange,
using
ahigh
resolution camera.Construction
Considerations
A
woodenframe
withthe
properly drilled
and routedholes
was constructed.It
wasthree-legged
for best
support.Each
leg
sits on a piece ofisomode
rubberfor
elimination ofhigh
frequency
vibrations.The
size ofthe
isomode has
been
calculated suchthat
eachleg
distributes
fifteen
pounds(total
weight of camerais
hS
pounds).It
uses conventional110
voltA.C.
A
vacuumpump
capable oftwenty
P.S.
I.G.
was used.Two
steel plates were
fabricated,
and a microscope withthe
proper opticswas obtained and assembled
to
the
mainframe,
as werethe
lamps
and wiring.This
being
athree
station camera and each stationrequiring
its
ownillumination
and vacuum system required electrical switches and vacuum valving.When
these
werein
position,
the
transport
arm was assembledand
the
intermediates
were placedin
the camera.The
transport
arm and
-k-Operat ion
Immediately
afterfocusing,a
sheet offilm
is
centered on stationnumber
three
andthe
vacuumis
switched on anddraws
the
emulsionto
immediate
contact withthe
cover glass.The
transport armis
positionedagainst
the
referencing
screw andthe
exposureis
made.Next,
vacuumof
the
transport
armis
switchedon,
and whenit
"takes
hold" of thefilms'
base
side^the emulsion side vacuumis
cut off.The
film
is
nowheld
tothe
transport
armby
vacuum and adhesive.It
then
is
rotatedto
station numbertwo.
The
vacuumis
appliedto
the
emulsion sothat
the
film
is
contactedto
the
glass plateintermediate.
When
the
emulsionside vacuum "holds"
the
transport
arm vacuumis
released.The
film
then
is
exposed.The
base
vacuumis
now applied andthe
emulsion vacuumreleased.
The
transport
arm withthe
film held
to
it
is
positionedto
the
referencing
screw of station number one.The
emulsion vacuumis
applied and
the
base
side vacuum released.The
proper exposureis
madeand the
test
objectis
nowfully
exposed.The
image
is
allowedto
stabilize
for
20
minutes andthen
is
processed.Optical
Considerations
The
objective of greaterth&PrTSne
thOtrs-ancLcyc
1
es per millimeterrequires a microscope object
ive^o^Jje.J^hjeopt
icusejK
The
one selectedis
aBausch
andLomb
achromat,
8
mm(21X)
with a numerical aperture of0.50.
This
was usedin
conjunction with a10X
Huygenian
eyepieceto
produce a
total
reduction of210 diameters.
These
were placedin
amicroscope
that
had
a coarse andfine
focus
knob
which wasnecessary
for
obtaining
optimumfocus.
The
numerical apertureis
requiredto
obtainthe
high
resolution.Using
the
formulas
:i no
Resolution
limit
(in
cycles permillimeter)-yl
-5-and
f
number =1
w
2N.A.
here^is
the
wavelengthin
millimicrons of thelight
Resolution
limit
=10
*=
i860
cycles per millimeter.used and
N.A.
is
the
numerical aperture ofthe
objective,
we obtain 106(2) (.5) (550)
Using
thisin
conjunction with a statementby
Altman
'that
the resolutionlimit
is
usually
greaterthan
the
calculatedlimit
andthat
the
limit
should
be
approximately 2000 divided
by
the
f
number alimit
of2000
cyclesper millimeter was assumed.
Then
assuming
this tobe
adiffraction
limited
objective
the
Modulation Transfer Factor
of thelens
was calculated'
and
is
shownin
Chart
I.
This
showsapproximately
a39%
modulation at1000
cycles per millimeter.
This
coupled with ahigh
gamma process andhigh
resolution
film
indicates
1000
cycles per millimeter shouldbe
well resolved.On
the
final
test
objectthese
calculations were proven validfor
thehigh
frequencies
were well resolved.Since
these are achromatic optics chromatic aberations were eliminatedby
the use of a narrowband
passfilter.
A Wratten
#99
(green)
peaking
at550,,-^
'fell within the spectralsensitivity
ofthe
649
GH^y'spectroscopic
film
being
used.The
filter
wasthen
sandwichedin
glass with the stationnumber
three
intermediate
and madethe
illumination
sufficiently
monochromaticsuch
that
no colorfringing
was noted oninspection
ofthe
aerialimage
and
high
resolution was obtained.A
cover glass was usedin
front
of the objective with the upper surfaceof
the
glassbeing
theimage
plane.A
vacuum channel aroundthe
glass allowedthe
emulsion of thefilm
to
be
brought
into
contact withthe
cover glass.This
is
illustrated
by
Figure
6.
Variation
in
film
base
thickness
is
not aproblem when
using
this
type
of system.For
some reasonthe
optical systemdid
not produce a210 diameter
reductionbut
morelike
a202
diameter
reduction,INTERMEDIATES
These
werethe
glass plates andfilm
in
the camerathat
were usedto
printthe
final
test
object.Station
No.
oneintermediate
is
ahigh
resolution glass plate witha
frequency
rangefrom
.25 cycles per millimeterto
.90 cycles per millimeter and a
polarity
of clearbars
on adark
surround.It
was gluedin
its
proper position onthe
camera.This
is
a contact print station.Station
No.
two
intermediate
is
ahigh
resolution glass plate witha
frequency
rangefrom
1.00
cycles per millimeter to57.28
cycles permillimeter,
with clearbars
on adark
surround.This
glass was cut andcemented
into
a steelblock
that
wasfastened
to
the camera.This
is
acontact print station.
Station
No.
one andtwo
intermediates
were obtainedfrom
contactprinting
the
necessary
frequencies
of aBuckbee-Mears
resolving
powertest
target.
These
intermediates
are therefore second generation and optimumline
width was not expectedto
be
printedfrom
them.
Station
No.
three
intermediate
is
onhigh
resolutionfilm
(649GH)
and
is
aten
diameter
reduction of master art work.The
master art work(10)
had
serifs onthe
bars
to
assure square corners onthe
final
print.This
wasthe
allimportant
step
to
bring
outthe
high
resolution.Frequency
range of
this
custom madeintermediate
wasfrom
.3048 cycles per millimeterto
.6152 cycles per millimeter with clearlines
on adark
surrounding.
When
usedin
conjunction withthe
microscope opticsthe
frequency
rangeof
the
image
is
64
cycles per millimeter to1292
cycles per millimeter.Evaluation
ofthis
intermediate
was on anAnsco
Model
Four
micro-dens itometer.
A
random sample offrequencies
wastraced
andthe
results
-7-considered quite acceptable.
Density
levels
andbar:
space ratio were alsofavorable.
The
intermediate
wasthen
sandwichedin
glass with aWratten
99
(green)
filter
and placedin
the camera.Exposing
indicated
that
attenuation offrequencies
was necessary.Thus
the
six,
seven andeight groups ended
up
with a .40 neutraldensity
and the ninegroup
had
a .20 neutral
density
andthe
ten
group
had
no attenuation.For
allintermediates
the
squares,
normally
found
onthis
type
format
test
target
,has
been
omitted or opacjued out.This
is
to
reducedevelopment
effects causedby
the squares.There
was an exception: onelarge
square wasleft
onfor
macrodensitometry
purposes.The
entirefrequency
range expectedfrom
allthree
intermediates
is
listed
in Table
1.
The
final
result when measured appeared tohave
a4.4%
variation
from
the
aimfrequencies.
Figure
7a,
7b,
7c
presents theformat
ofthe
intermediates
andFigures
8a,
8b,
8c
illustrates
what the printsfrom
each ofthe
intermediates
look
like
individually.
Figure
9
presentsthe
composite printusing
the
three station multi-exposure method.Test
Object
Considerations
Because
of thehigh
resolution expected the productbest
suitedto
record
the
information
was649
GH
spectroscopicfilm.
Its
sensitivity
also makesit
convenient to usein
adarkroom
with safelightillumination.
The
final
test
object configurationfollows
that
givenin
Military
Standard
-150A
ofa
bar
being
2.5
times
aslong
asit
is
wide.The
progression of
the
bars
wasto
decrease
by
the
sixth root oftwo.
(12)
On
the
final
test
objectthe
information
capacity
was calculated.Where
C
=M
r ,
C
=
information
capacity
Mr
=the
resolving
powerin
cycles per millimeter onthe
f
i
lm
assuming
M
=1235
c//mm
6
2
C
=1
-8-This
reflects theinformation
capacity
that
the camera andfilm
is
capableof.
It
is
approximately
half
the
value givenby
McCamy
as thecapacity
of
high
resolution emulsion.Evaluation
Camera
:Focus
and reference of afrequency
set within anotherfrequency
set was quite consistant.
The
cameradid
needfocus
daily
but
remainedin
focus
oncebest
focus
was obtained.Occasionally
it
woulddrift.
The
transport
armhas
adhesive onit
asinsurance
that
film
curl wouldnot
suddenly
p_op
the
film
free
ofthe
arm.Aside
from
this
trivial pointall vacuum and
illumination
systems andintermediates
performed theirfunctions
well.The
instrument
is
capable oftransporting
andprecisely
registering
a4
by
5
inch
film
sheet at each ofthe
exposing
stations.Evaluation
ofFigure
9
test
objectbears
this
out asdo
the
photomicrographs of
Figs.
10,11,
and12.
Evaluation
of station number threeintermediate
shows ahigh
Dmax
and
only
the
ten
group
showsany
sign of a noticeableDmin.
Frequencies
obtained are within one percent of aim and the clear
bars
areslightly
narrower than the
dark
spacesbetween
them.
This
is
afavorable
condition.Test
Object:
f
O
The
evaluation ofthe
test
object producedby
stations one andtwo
is
notvery
quantitative.It
wasdone
by
viewing
the
target
through
amicroscope,
and observation of photomicrographFig.
12.
These
stations aren'tto
be
evaluatedcritically
because
the
intermediates
are second generationand
improving
edgesharpness,
bar
shape andbar:
space ratioetc.,
in
the
low
frequency
rangeis
trivial.
With
master platesfor
these
stationsthe
-9-Generally,
the
target
for
the
low
frequency
rangehas
good edgesharpness,
bar
shape andbar:space
ratio.The
exceptionis
the
five
group
which
displays
the
cigar effectdue
to
the
loss
ofhigh
frequency
information
(corners
containhigh
frequencies)
whengoing
throughthe
three generationsthat
producedthe
print.This
is
noticedin
Fig.
11.
Evaluation
ofthe
test
target
producedby
station number three wasdone
on anAnsco Model
4
microdensitometer-The
samefrequencies
traced onthe
intermediate
weretraced
onthe
test
target,
whe re possible.The
limiting
factor
is
the
effective aperature usedfor
tracing
of .94 microns.This
will allowtracing
to
frequencies
tp^cayfivehundred
cycles permillimeter.
However
practicallimitations
restrictstracing
to
a couplehundred
cycles per millimeter.Beyond
this
tracing
is
impractical
for
if
the
bar:space
ratioisn't
unity
the
aperture wouldbe
integrating
abar
and aspace simultaneously.
There
is
alsodiffraction
by
the
bars
that
couldremove
light
from
the
zero order mainbeam.
This
could resultin
higher
density
valuesfor
clear areas orlower
density
valuesfor dense
areas.The
tracing
results arelisted
in
Table
111.
This
showsthat
the
test
object was on an average4.4%
below
the aimfrequencies.
This
erroris
unaxplainab,e.^o^O^/aA^~W
*
The
Dmax
is
not consistantthroughout
allfrequencies
andindicates
that
further
manipulation of neutraldensities
is
in
order and perhapsmore exposure and process could
be
used.The
bar:
space ratio shows narrowdark
bars
and alsoindicates
additionable exposure wouldbe
tolerable.The
decrease
in
the
density
difference
in
the
high
frequencies
is
thought
notto
be
as real asit
appears.For
this
is
the
region ofinstrumentation
readoutproblems and also
the
Dmin
when viewedin
a microscope appearsvery
low
10-Photomicrographs
were made ofthe
testtarget
(see
Figures
10,
11
and12).
Figure
10
showsthe
maximum resolution obtainedto
be
1235
cycles per millimeter.
Perhaps
if
additional steps were onthe
ten
group,
they
couldbe
resolved.It
shouldbe
notedthat
aloss
ofresolution,
edge s
ha
rpne>*tetc.,ioccur whenmaking
the
photomicrographs.One
mustalso
be
surethat
the
opticsfor
viewing
the
test
object are of sufficientquality
sothat
the
bars
canbe
resolved.Figures
11
and12 do
not resolvethe
high
frequency
bars
because
ofthe
optics quality.In
general,
the
bar
shape andtest
object appearanceis
quite acceptable
for
ahigh
resolutionresolving
powertest
target
of extended range.CONCLUSIONS
The
hypothesis
has
been validated,
and all aims setforth
in
theobjectives of
this
project were attained.The
camera wasbuilt
andthe
proper
intermediates
produced.When
usedin
conjunction with the threestation
multi-exposing method,
aresolving
powertest
object of extendedrange was produced.
The
technique presentedhas
many
attractivefeatures,
including
making
test
objects of otherfrequency
ranges.Breaking
exposuredown
into
contact and optical stations allowsobtaining
afrequency
rangethat
can notbe easily
accomplishedby
any
other means.Evaluation
ofthe
camera,
intermediates
andtest
target
indicates
this
to
be
an acceptable systemto
produceresolving
powertest
targets
-11-RECOMMENDATIONS
1.
The
camera shouldbe
made sturdier and of ahigher
precisionto
increase
repeatability
sothat
extended rangetest
objects couldbe
produced on a production
basis.
2.
Obtaining
a mastertest
target
for
the
lower
frequencies
couldproduce an
improved
test
object.3.
Consolidation
of station number one and twomay
be
possible.Line
width control could
be
obtainedby
using
neutraldensity
filters
onthe
necessary
frequencies
(base
side of course).The
use ofthe
filters
workedwell
to
controlthe
exposurelevel
of thehigher frequencies.
4.
Test
objects of otherfrequency
ranges could alsobe
obtainedfrom
the
camera.One
cycle per millimeterto
greater than athousand,
or .25cycles
to
64
cycles per millimeter are usefulfor many
systems.5.
The
camera shouldbe
useddirectly
to
test
resolution offilms,
paper^(tcj/
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I
wishto
thankthe
faculty
andmany
others who providedhelpful
assistance,
especially Mr.
Stanford
Perry
andMr.
Douglas
Gressons
who
12-REFERENCES
1.
Charles
D.
Reid,
Phot.
Sci.
Eng.
JO, 5,
(1966).
2.
Franc
Grum,
Phot.
Sci.
Eng.
7, 2,
(1
963)
.3.
Robert
L.
Lamberts Applied
Optics
2, 3,
(
1
963)
.4.
P.
Harrharan,
Phot.
Sci.
Eng.
2, 2,
(1958).
5.
J.
H.
Altman,
Phot.
Sci.
Eng.
5,
1,
(1961).
6.
"Techniques
of Microphotography"Kodak
Publication,
No.
P-52,
(1963)
7.
"Modulation
Transfer
Data
for Kodak
Films"Kodak
Pamphlet,
No.
P-49,
(1962).
8.
"Kodak
Wratten
Filters"Scientific
andTechnical
Data
Book,
No.
B-3
(1962).
9.
"Tech
Bits"Kodak
Pamphlet
No.
P-3,
(1966).
10.
"Techniques
of Microphotography,"Kodak
Publication
No.
P-52,
(1967).
11.
"Military
Standard
150A,
Photographic
Lenses"Dept.
ofDefense,
U.S.
Gov't.
Printing
Office,
p.21.
0^ is; O IH Eh CO
<3-I
Cxi o IS o l-H E-i CO>
c 125 O fH Eh CO --^_43 H O o o Eh O cv O ! H Eh .o 53 H
53 o O
Eh
O
H aj rH . Eh
O B rH
53 C o Q O EC rH Eh o
53 l-H S3
o Eh o
H Eh O M
Eh SS S3 Ph
a; l-H
p
EH
CO (X
FIGURE
1
FIGURE
3
FIGURE
STATION
KO.
3
TRANSPORT
ARM AGAINST
REFERENCE SCREW
rx,
1
:f
1*1
^
. <C
J
'
vO
fi
FIGURE 7a
FIGURE
7b
INTERMEDIATES
REPRESENTATIVE
OF
THOSE USED
AT EACH
STATION
STATION
NO.l
STATION NO.
2
FIGURE
7c
PRINTS
FROM
EACH
STATION
INDEPENIENTLY
STATION
NO.
1
FIGURE
8a
STATION
NO.
2
FIGURE
8b
STATION NO.
3
FIGURE 8c
vi
HIGH
RESOLUTION
RESOLVING
POWER TEST TARGET
2
L
-2
=
///
5///
6
5'
///
b
-/
/=
/=,
'I/S3
=/
Si:
h/s
s
HIS
6
US4p.
795/
JSURE
METHOD
FIGURE
9
i H<
TOMICROGRAPHS
PIGTJHE, 10
FIGURE 11
200X
ENLARGED
PHOTOMICROGRAPHS
(CON'T)
50X
ENLARGED
FIGURE 12
ix
o-i oo vo 1- x. o UJ -3 cc CQ LU O O-1- co </> LU LU z. H _J * LU CC -J CQ LU 3 < o o CD UJ ZZ. o ZZZ> > a _J o o CC CO o. LU UJ CC cc CM I a o !_ CJ
I
CM O OO CM as CM*~~ r *
CM IA r-. LA VO vO vO CM 1--. 00 vO VO CM oo CM CO CM rO CO vO OO
r--o OOLA
00 CM ro J" vO CM 00 o CM CM CM vO O O 00 o o CM o o CM vo oo J-oo cm ia o en o o -cr 00 CM 0O J-J- 00 00 00 CM CM CO LTV CA
o J"LTV o LA 1^ LA O O CM CT\ vO CM
3
VOVO r- O
CM CM CM LTV CM OO CM 00 o OO o 00 vO CM VO CM CM CM CM CM tA IA CM vO vO vO
o CM J"
00 OO
o CM LA 00 IA
TABLE
I I
GROUP/
STEP
AIM
ACTUAL
%
ofDMAX
FREQJJENCY*FREO_UENCY*
AIM
6/1
6/4
6/5
7/2
7/6
8/1
8/5
9/4
9/5
9/6
10/1
.3048 .4328 .4846 .68271.091
1.219
1.938
3.457
3.876
4.362
4.876
.3062 .44174792
.66841.0367
1.159
1.954
3.479
3.834
4.379
4.932
100.10
3.70
97-98
4.00
101.10
4.00
97.91
3.60
95.02
3.30
95.10
4.00
100.80
3.90
100.60
3.60
98.92
3.50
100.40
3.60
101.10
4.00
DMIN
.01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .03 .01 .03 .06BAR:
SPACE
RATIO
1.14
1.04
1.08
1.30
1.36
1.33
1.08
0.88
1.00
0.92
1.05
Average
=99.01% of aimPolarity
ofintermediate
is
clearbars
on ablack
surroundMeasured
on anANSC0 MODEL
4
microdensitometer"in cycles per millimeter
TABLE
I I I
Evaluation
ofTest
Target
from Station
Number Three.
Grou
p/Step
Aim
Frequency-"
Actual
Frequency
%
of*
A i
mDMAX
DMIN
Bar:Space
Ratio
6/1
64
61
95.3
2
.4507
1:1.12
6/4
91
88
97.1
2
.25 .071:1.16
6/5
102
102
100%
2
.15 .071:1
.207/2
143
129
90.2
1
.4507
1:1
.217/6
229
214
93.9
1
.44.10
1:1
.20
8/1
256
243
94.9
.70.10
1:1.12
8/5
407
406
99.8
.60.12
1:1.18
9/4
726
678
93.2
.61.42
1:1.03
19/5
814
774
95.1
.60 .441:1.19
9/6
916
Can't
be
measured onytfD .62 .481:1.18
10/1
1024
Can't
be
measured on>AD
Average
=95.6%
ofaim;
therefore,
4.4%
error.Bars
aredense
(printed
from
clearbar
ofintermediate)
All
tracing
wasdone
on anAnsco Model
4
Microdensi
tometer.An
effective aperture of .94 microns was used to evaluatethe
target.
"in cycles per millimeter.
a
/
H H H X
/
/
-H 5^
I
4
-j
-.