Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
4-5-1986
Modular constructions: a written documentation
Susan Clellen
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
Recommended Citation
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF
TECHNOLOGYA Thesis Submitted
totheFaculty
ofThe College
ofFine
andApplied Arts
in
Candidacy
for
theDegree
ofMASTER OF FINE ARTS
MODULAR
CONSTRUCTIONS:
A WrittenDocumentation
By
Susan E. Clellen
APPROVALS
Adviser: Robert Schmitz /
Robert W. Schmitz
Date:
6~
11
)
l
S
lb
Associate Adviser: Graham Marks /
Graham Marks
Date:
1"/#
Associate Adviser: Ed Miller /
Ed Miller
Date:
y,
2--'1.
f
f..
Special Assistant to the Dean for Graduate Affairs:
~~~~~~~~~'x
Professor Phili
p B
ornart
h
Date:
5/;2.
jft,
Philip W. Bornarth
I
Dean, College of Fine
&
Applied Arts:
Dean Dr. Robert H. Johnston /
Robert H. Johnston Ph.D.
Date:
o/;) ..
~J~(,
I,
Susan Clellen
,
prefer to be contacted each time a
request for reproduction is made. I can be reached at the following
address.
CONTENTS
List
ofIllustrations
Page
4
Thesis
Statement
Page5
Thesis Show
Page
6
Thesis
Page
7
Footnotes
Page
35
Bibliography
Page 36
LIST
OF
ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure
1
.Handmade
Brick
Page 9
Figure
2.
Modular Structures
Page
13
Figure
3.
Installations
Page
16
Figure
4.
Wall
Study
Page
17
Figure
5.
Wall
Study
Page 18
Figure
6.
Cantilevered Limbs
Page
20
Figure
7.
Arches
Page
21
Figure
8.
Post
andLintel
Page
22
Figure 9.
Arch
Page 23
THESIS
STATEMENT
I
intend
to
create architectural unitsemploying
the
principles of modular construction.
Modular
units combinedwith or without surface embellishments will
be incorporated
to
define
specific spacesfor
living
needs.The
pieces willfacilitate
flexibility
in
designing
avariety
of environmentalsituations.
Installations
will reflectconceptual,
sculpturaland
functional
considerationsfor the
environment.Materials
THESIS SHOW
My
Thesis Exhibit
consisted offive
cast concrete sculpturalpieces.
This
body
of work represents variousfurniture
motifs.The
pieces rangedin
sizefrom three
feet
to
sixfeet
in
length
and
two
feet
to four
feet
in height.
Animated
shapes variedin
configuration and proportion.
Pastels
and off whites enhancedthe
heavily
textured
surfaces of cast relief and stucco.(See
This
paper willdescribe
the
progression ofmy
work atRochester Institute
ofTechnology
andhow
my
Thesis
Show
evolved
from
my Thesis
Statement.
Although
my Thesis Show
is
the
culmination ofmy
studies atR.I.T.,
each phase ofthe
progression will
be discussed
as a significantbody
of work.Each
phase was an exploration ofthe
issues
presentedin my
Thesis Statement.
In
my first
attemptto
employ
an architecturalmedium,
I
designed
and produced50
large handmade
bricks.
Units
were20"x10"x5"
hollow
slab constructions.I
used aGeorgia
stoneware and
Missouri
fireclay
combinationto
produce a richbrick
redclay
body
withfireclay
coilsfor
inlayed
patterns.The
bricks
werefree-standing,
self-supporting
and stackable.I
choseto
usethe
surface ofthe
unitsto
explore avariety
traditionally
been
embellishedin
repetitious motifs.The
unitand
its
surfacedecorations
have
workedtogether
to
maintainvisual
uniformity
in
their
functional
capacity.In
my
exploration,
eachindividual
unit represented adifferent
pattern:
diagonal,
perpendicular,
and random.One
to two
inch
coils of
contrasting
clay
wereinlayed
onthe
outside surfacesof
the
brick.
Patterns
remained similarin
scaleto
maintainmy
own
form
ofcontinuity
(figure
1
, slides1
-2).
As
achild,
I
played with woodenbuilding
blocks. Hours
onend were spent
tediously
creating
elaborate and simpleconstructions.
At
the
end of eachday
one ofmy
parents wouldmake sure
I
gatheredup
the
blocks
andtossed them
into
the
toy
chest.
Permanence
was neverto
be
associated withanything
made
from blocks.
Drawings
that I
made,
however,
managedto
be
savedfor
atleast
afew
years -from
pad,
to refrigerator,
to
storage.At
anearly
age welearn that
blocks,
"Leggos" andFigure 1.
Handmade Brick
Li___
' B*
t=*\
%'1
,-*
*>7
< ..8
(T
sst
)
0
0
?
^" /,I
(I
0
I'.'l* <7
'*
/
'
0
oo
_J __.*
.* <> *' >* > i_Vfc
0
!
TTi
H
\N
nnrr
&
oo
oo
9
oo
oo
Uo
oo
modular medium
be
validonly
whenit
is
functional
andpermanent?
At
what pointdoes
"play" end and "work" begin?1'2-As
anArtist,
I have
used a modular construction mediumto
explore space on a grand scale.
It
was much easierto
arrangesmall components
than to
wrestle withlarger
pieces.It
was awonderful revelation
to
use componentsto
build
structuresthat
werelarger
than
myself.Until
this
time,
I had limited
the
scale of
my
workbased
onthe
ability
to
maneuver piecesin
the
studio and
into
the kiln.
The
concept ofplasticity
wasultimately
the
reasonfor
selecting
a modular mediumin
whichto
work.I
wasintrigued
with
the
fact
that
until mortar orany
othercongealing
mediumis
introduced,
the
constructionis infinite.
There
is
nolimit
to
the
variations ortime
involved in setting up
aninstallation.
As
creator and
builder,
I found the
process of changebecoming
animportant
element ofthe
work.A
very fluid
body
of workis
and what a "brick" canbe.
My
first
experiencein
building
withthe
handmade brick
began
withthe
construction of a series of walls.By isolating
the
wallfrom
other architecturalcomponents,
it
was easierfor
meto
focus
on anddefine
key
issues.
A
wallis
essentially
a plane
that
runs perpendicularto the
ground anddivides
spaceinto
two
categories:this
side andthat
side.Walls
areconstructed
to
obstruct or containactivity
-a
boundary
passively
imposing
limitations.
The
fifty
bricks
I
produced allowed meto
build
a structureroughly
sixfeet
by
eightfeet
orforty-eight
squarefeet.
I
constructed walls
using
avariety
ofstacking
techniques
andarrangements.
Individual
bricks
were selected and organizedaccording
to their
inlayed
patterns.By
controlling
the
stacking
order and arrangement of
the
bricks,
I
was ableto
stimulate orhighlight
visualactivity
within an area ofthe
wall.The
construction,
reconstruction and alteration ofthe
installations.
This
mobilequality
posed aninteresting
contrastto the
traditional
permanence ofthe brick
medium.The
wallinstallations
evolvedinto
architectural vignettes:floors,
stairs and enclosures.The
vignettes served asscrutinizing
studiesto
searchfor
the
foundations
ofarchitecture...dissected,
distilled,
magnified:The
essence...theroot...
the
symbol.Searching
for these
symbolslead
meto
consider primitiveand prehistoric sites as references
for
my
work.I
wasinterested in
the
purest and simplest constructions.Examples
that
demonstrated
the basic
components(wall, floor,
roof)
were
Trilithon,
Dolman,
Menhir,
Cromlech,
Taula
andStonehenge.
Their
magnified scale emphasizedthe
simplicity
of
the
components(figure
2.).
Figure 2.
Modular Structures
3
Menhir
Alignment
\
Trilathon
Dolman
first
employedin
its
rawstate,
wasrolled,
dragged,
cut,
stacked and arranged.
Free standing
stone monoliths or"Menhir"
were
purposefully
placed alone orin
groupingsto
denote
space.The
single unit marked a spot.Serveral
units marked an area.A
row of monolithsformed
an alignment.An
alignment wasalso used
to form
an enclosure such as a circle.Monoliths in
combination with
lintels
created an enclosed structure called"Trilathons".
The
Trilathon,
in
turn,
is
the
unit andstepping
stone
for
more complex architecture.The
modular unithas
evolved as
the
essence ofbuilding,
andthese
simpleconstructions
have
become
the
essence of architecture.The
human
desire
to
create andbuild lies
testimony
in
these
ancient rocks.
These
pure and simpleforms
elicitedin
me aninstinctual drive
to build.
The
modular unit wasthe tool
for my
exploration of a
building
process and an architectural vocabUpon
the
completion ofthe
handmade brick
project,
I began
experimenting
with a pallet ofbuilding
bricks.
The
absence ofmortar
from
the
installation
process enabled meto
workthrough
many ideas
and configurations.Documentation
wasequally
as spontaneous.Snapshots,
drawings,
andmemory
preserved
these
installations
as performances(figures
3
-5,
slide
4.).
I
wasinterested
in pushing
the
mediumto
its
physicallimitations
in
height,
length,
random construction andintegration
of cement and wood elements.A
scissorsjack
wasused
to
arch anddistort
walls.Cement
shapes werebuilt
into
constructions
like
alien material.Due
to
spaceconfinements, I
often worked at night
building
sprawling installations
that
obstructed
the
entirehandbuilding
studio.Preciousness
andpermanence were not
issues
athand.
Once
again,
like playing
with children's
blocks,
I
was ableto
explorethe
plasticity
ofAt
this
pointI
wantedto
expand uponthe
nature ofthe
unitas sculpture.
Images
ofsomething
animated,
plastic andmobile
kept
coming
to
mind.I
wantedto
develop
amultifaceted module
that
would activatethe
spaceit
occupies.Previous
explorations with cast concreteled
meto
determine
that the
mediumhad
potentialto
expandthis
body
of work.Concrete,
like
brick
is
a common construction material.This
air cured ceramic medium enabled me
to
explorethe
potentialof
liquid
castform.
In transition from brick to concrete, I
discovered that the
medium would allow meto
place greateremphasis on
form.
The
connectionto
architectureremained,
but in
more poeticterms.
The forms inferred
"something" architectural:steps,
arches,
post andlintel,
zig-zags and repetitious units.The
shapes and components
took
ongravity
defying
positions:Figure
6.
Cantilevered
During
this
phaseI
began
to
focus
onthe
potential ofsurface embellishment.
I
applied coarse stuccoto
cementforms
and paintedthem
in
shades of subtle pastels.Stucco is
used
in
architecture as an applieddecorative
texture.
Interior
and exterior walls are often "iced" with
this
medium,
cracksand
joints
arehidden beneth its defense
coat.The
gesturalmotifs of
hand
application are often preserved as part ofthe
congealed
decorative
finish.
(I
have
memories ofmy
grandparents'
guest
room,
the
walls and ceilings werelike
turbulant
seas of stucco wavesthat
swirled and surgedinto
violent
points.)
The
textured
surfaces ofmy
pieces created anew
dimension.
They
transformed
dense
concrete shapesinto
lively
architectonic motifs.In
preparationfor
my
thesis
showI
continuedto
usemodular construction
to
solidify my
conceptual,
sculptural andwas concerned with
the
use ofintimate
living
spaces.Industrial
design
and architecturehave
imposed
rigidstructures
for
the
domestic
environments andfor
the
objectswith which we
live.
Furniture
has
evolved as a product ofarchitecture.
Standardization
of a "room"has brought
abouthomogeneous
solutionsto
living
needs.My
workis in
part astatement about
the
needfor
alternativesin
ourdaily
lives.
We
must challengethose
formulas
that
reduce our existanceto
nothing
morethan style,
function
and conformity.For this
reason
I have
chosento
focus
onthe
expressive and emotionalqualities
for
furniture.
My
choice ofform,
color,
texture,
material, mobility,
andfunctionality
are combinedto
addressas well as generate an alternative.
Traditional
living
environments are saturated with passivespaces.
The geometry
of rooms characterizethe
furniture
asrectangles,
squares,
and cubes.The
negativespaces,
in
turn,
Framed
by
concentric spaces andforms,
a coffeetable,
for
example,
is
the
centerpiece of aliving
room,
andis
an exampleof an object
that
is framed
by
concentric spaces and shapes.The
coffeetable
became
the
first
subjectin
a series offive
thesis
worksto
addressthe
issues
ofactivating
living
space.THECOFFEETABLE
The
Coffee Table
consisted of eight separate concretecomponents.
The
table
top
was madeup
oftwo
large
3
in.
thick
slabs with a combined surface area of
16
sq.ft.The
sixmodular
legs
stood14
in.
high.
These
mobile components couldbe
easily
rearrangedto
distribute
the
slabs'weight evenly.
I
designed
the
table
to
be
assembledin
many
different
configuarations.
The
top
slabs wereassymetric,
angular shapes withcombined
to
make new positive and negative shapes.New
shapes and spaces could also
be
generatedby
playing
these
components off
the
environment.(Figure
1 0).
The
surface ofthe table tops
alludedto
an aerial view of aplastic
landscape.
Glossy
pastellavender
andblue
paint glazedthe
entire work.Colors delineated
coarse and smooth areas.Erroded
stuccoterrains
boldly
cutthe
slabsinto secondary
shapes.
(Slide
4).
THE
TEA TABLE AND
VASE
The Tea Table
andVase
was a small variation ofThe
Coffee
Table,
but
with a new connectionto
utility.The
two
modular
table tops became the
setting
for
a vase.The
familiar
image
ofpottery
ontables
is
often associated withdecoration
or utility.
The
vasebecame the
symbol ofthis
duality:
art on aThe Tea Table
andVase
was madeup
oftwo
(18 in.
x24
in.
x3
in.)
cast concreteslabs,
each of which were suspendedon single
14
in.
columnlegs.
The
configurations ofthe
modulartops
were reminiscent of angularjigsaw
puzzle pieces orchunks of
floating
ice.
These
two
multifaceted shapes weredesigned
to
be
placed sideby
sidein
avariety
of arrangements.The
vase andtable
surfaces were cast withheavy
relief andpainted pale
blue.
Deep
sawtooth ridges cutdeeply
acrossboth
table tops
andalong
the
side ofthe
vase.Bright
yellowearthworm cavities
randomly
travelled
acrossthe
table
surfaces and on
top
ofthe
vase.(Slides
5
-6).
THE
TWIN
TABLES
The
Twin
Tables
were madeup
oftwo
elongatedtriangular
slabs(5
ft.
x3
ft.)
which were elevated on six stoutinstalled
astwo
separatetables
ortogether
in
avariety
ofconfigurations.
Three
removable vases were situated onthe
table tops.
The
vases andtable
components were made of castconcrete and
textured
with cast relief and stucco.The
entirepiece was painted
in
two
shapes of white: cool and warm.Upon
closerexamination,
The Twin Tables
revealed richtactile
details.
I
applied aheavy
stuccocoating
overthe
entirepiece.
Some
sufaces were rough andsharp in
texture.
Other
areas were smooth and soft
resembling
erroded riverbed shale.Finger
marks smudgedthrough
the
stuccoto
make scalloppedridges.
The
cast relief ofthe
vases,
table tops
andlegs
wereaccentuated with
the textured
glaze.Reminiscent
of adining
table,
The
Twin Tables
werethe
most narrative works
in my
show.I
was not challengedby
maintaining
the
details
ofthe
functional
format,
but
by
expressing
how
furnishings
canplay
a more active rolein
ouras a symbol
for utility
anddecoration.
The
casual stance andlocation
ofthe three
vasesdid
not speak aboutformal
placesettings or
centerpieces,
but
rather aboutday
to
day
casualactivity.
(Slides
7
-9).
THE END
TABLE
The End
Table
wasthe
last
table
in
the thesis
series.The
table
consisted offour
components.Three 30 in. black
cylinderlegs
supported a single slabtable
top
(30
in.
x26
in.
x3
in.).
The
shape ofthe table
top,
like
the
previoustables
wasassymetric.
The
sides werejagged,
smooth,
and angular.Three
white cylinderfragments jutted
outfrom the
joint holes
on
the table top. The End Table
was somewhatdifferent
from
the
previoustables.
With only
onetable
top,
it did
nothave the
sculpture profile of
the
table
top
wasdesigned
to
be
experienced
in
the
round.It
wasisolated
and singular with nofront,
back,
or sides.The
entiretable
was paintedflat black.
The
suface ofthe
table
was embellished with aheavy
coat of stucco.Finger
marks congealed
into
squiggles acrossthe
surface and revealedthe black
paint underneath.The sharp
points ofdried
stuccowere
both
decorative
anddangerous,
adefense
mechanismagainst
tempted
touches
of seducedhands.
(Slide
10).
THE BENCH
The
Bench
wasthe
last
piecein my study
for
living
environments.
The
parkbench design
was aninspiration for
this
particular piece.The
two
side supports were madefrom
cast
concrete, stucco,
and paint.The
seat slats were cutfrom
The
seat was18
in.
high,
24
in.
wide and18
in. deep. The
sideswere
36 in. high
and32
in. deep.
Geometric
shapes of pastel green and pink were usedto
quietly break up
the
form
ofthe bench.
The
closenessin
valueand shade of
the two
colors madeit difficult
to
distinguish
onecolor
from the
other.Both
color andtexture
were passivein
comparison
to the
over configuration ofthe bench.
The
Bench
was a playful
interpretation
ofthe
typical
bench.
The
dramatic,
animated shapes were createdto
bring
to
life
a placethat
is
restful and quiet.Park
benches,
churchpews,
andwaiting
rooms aregenerally
placesfor
quiet....public placesThe
process ofwriting
my
thesis
has led
meto
realizethat
my
thesis
statement reflectedonly
onelevel
ofmeaning in my
work.
While
the
brick,
brick
constructions,
and concretefurniture/sculptures dealt
with elements of architecture andenvironment,
the
work also embodiedmy
personal andhuman
response
to
my
living
spaces.This
conceptual and emotionallevel
transcends
the
issues
ofprocess,
function
and'
/
v.
\
\
'
.
FOOTNOTES
1.
J.C.
Fredrich
vonSchiller,
On
The Aesthetic Education
Of
Man,
(London:
Macmillan &
Co.,
1964).
p.79.
"In
every
condition of
humanity,
it is precisely
play,
andplay
alonethat
makes man complete.Man
playsonly
whenhe
is in
the
full
sense ofthe
word aman,
andhe
is wholly
man whenhe
is
playing."T.S.
Eliot,
"Notes
Toward
A Definition Of
Culture,"(Partisan
Review,
no148,
1944).
Eliot
believed that the
separationof work
from
play
wasdestructive to
cultural roots.Bernard
Rudofsky,
Architecture
Without
Architects,
(N.Y.:
Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Inc., 1964),
Drawings
werebased
onillustrations,
photographs anddescriptions in
the
text.
pp.84-114.
4.
Ibid,
p.110.
"The
stepping
stonefrom the
monolithto
trilithon
or post andlintel
led
manto the threshhold
ofBIBLIOGRAPHY
Bloome,
Kent C.
Body, Memory,
andArchitecture. New
Haven,
Ct.: Yale
University
Press.
1977.
Branzi,
Andrea.
The Hot
House Italian New Wave Design.
Cambridge,
Mass.:
M.I.T.
Press,
1984.
Eliot,
T.S.
"Notes
Toward
A Definition Of
Culture,
"Partisan
Review,
no.148,
1944.
Radice,
Barbara.
Memphis,
The
New International
Style.
Milan,
Italy:
Electa
Publishing
Co.,
1981.
Rudofsky,
Bernard.
Architecture
Without
Architects. N.Y.:
Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Inc.,
1964.
Rudofsky,
Bernard.
The
Prodigious Builders.
N.Y.:
Harcourt,
Brace, Jovanovich, Inc.,
1977.
von
Schiller,
J.C. Fredrich. On
The Aesthetic Education Of Man.
London: Macmillan &
Co.,
1964.
Zevi,
Bruno.
Architecture As
Space:
How
To
Look
At