Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
Spring 2005
Adolescent girls
Chae Kihn
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please [email protected].
Recommended Citation
Adolescent Girls
By
Chae Kihn
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of
The requirements for the degree of
Master of Fine Arts
Rochester Institute of Technology
Spring 2005
Approved by
Elaine O'Neil
Chair: Elaine O'Neil
Date
Professor, School of Photographic Arts and Sciences
w.
Osterman
Willie Osterman
Professor, School of Photographic Arts and Sciences
Date
Loret Steinberg
Loret Steinberg
I
I
Thesis/Dissertation Author Permission Statement
Title of thesis or dissertation:
AAo\a.:5CQrrl
G; ('\5
Name of author:
Chuo. :3'"r..,ccy.X?l\01;?<
~\ho
Degree: {y)cg'>k ,- oE"
fi
f\& ~Program:
1bo~cn+>~
College:
Sc..~ ~
~~c
&3i> oocl
Sc:.t'o
ocos
I understand that I must submit a print copy of my thesis or dissertation to the RIT Archives. per current RIT guidelines for the completion of my degree. I hereby grant to the Rochester Institute of Technology and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media in perpetuity. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis or dissertation. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.
Print Reproduction Permission Granted:
I.
C\=:)lA
a ...'(,bn
.
hereby grant permission to the Rochester Institute Technology to reproduce my print thesis or dissertation in whole or in part. Any reproduction will not be for commercial use or profit.Chae Kihn
Signature of Author: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date:
Print Reproduction Permission Denied:
I. • hereby deny permission to the RIT Library of the Rochester Institute of Technology to reproduce my print thesis or dissertation in whole or in part.
Thisthesisis dedicatedtoallthegirlsIworked with atHeritageHigh
Schoolin New York
City,
andBeginning
With ChildrenMiddle SchoolinWilliamsburg.
They
are a continual source ofinspiration.Itisalsodedicatedtomy three advisors, Professor Elaine
O'Neil,
Professor Willie
Osterman,
andProfessor LoretStienberg
who workedwith me
tirelessly
oncompleting my degree.Most ofall, thisdegree is dedicatedto myparents,Dr Ronald Kihn and
Table Of
Contents
Page 1 Introduction
Page 3 The Elements Of
Photography
Page 10
Documentary Photography
Page 14 A Short
History
Page 27 The
Relationship
BetweenDocumentary
PhotographerandSubjectPage 30 AdolescentGirls
Page30 The Photographer
Page50 The Process
Page 56 The Photographs
Page 59 The Exhibition
Introduction
From April 5throughApril 17, 2002,1presented aphotographicexhibit entitled
Adolescent GirlsattheSPAS galleryontheRochester Instituteof
Technology
campus.I subsequentlyexhibitedthesame show atHeritage High School from
May
15throughJune 15,2002. Theshow consisted of sixty-fiveblackandwhite,silvergelatin,
photographic prints mountedbehindglass, and alistof wordscommonly usedtolabel
youngwomen. Theimages werejuxtaposedagainstthewords sotheaudience could
contrastthe"labels"withtheimages ofthe girls. Whiletheshow wasputtogether to
complete part oftherequirementsforaMasterofFine Artsdegree,AdolescentGirlsfits
intothebroadercontext ofmywork;itexplorestherelationshipsthegirlshave witheach
other andthemselves,
investigating
howtheynaturally interact intheirworld on adaily
basis. Ifocus ontheircommunicationthrough
body
languageand gestures,whichis acommontheme throughoutmywork. Thisprojectextendstheparametersofmyprevious
projectsbecause it isthefirstlong-term, in-depth,
documentary
photographyprojectthatI have donewithinthefreedomof an artisticframework.
By
having
theluxury
ofunlimitedtimeIfeltthatI reallygottoknowthe girls withinthe context oftheirschool
environment.Thisknowledgealoud metoominimizemyownexpectations and
preconceived notions.
Attheopening intheSPAS
Gallery
one ofmy guests asked mehow Ichoose thesubjectofmythesisexhibition.
Exactly
whatinterestedme abouttheseyoungwomen? Istoppedforamomentandthought,how andwhy doyou choose a subject? Theproblems
as anyothervisualartist. Thephotographsthemselves,inpart,embodythebeliefsand
concernsheld
by
thephotographer. But I alsofeltlikeanswering: thesubject choseme.Iwas still
living
inRochester,NewYork,andI photographed acheerleadingcompetition attheBlueCross Arena. I became intrigued withthewaythat thegirls
interactedwith each other.
They
werephysicallyandemotionally veryconnected.They
seemedtohaveadifferent ideaof personal boundariesand
body
language. I becamevery interested in
learning
more aboutthisagegroupandtheimportantconnectionstheyweresharing withtheirpeers, particularlyasthesecontrastedwith popularmedia
portrayals ofadolescent girls.
When I movedtoNew YorkCity,I startedto takephotographsin city schools. I
wantedtoobservehowthegirlsrelated withinthestructuredconfines of a school system.
I spent almosttwoyears photographingat
Beginning
WithChildren Middle SchoolinWilliamsburg
andHeritage High School in Spanish Harlem. I beganthis projectwondering: Whoaretheseyoungwomen,andwhyarethey somisunderstoodinsociety?
Why
are theyportrayed sonegatively inthemedia?For mythesisprojectI also wantedtodoa
"pure"
documentary
project.By
photographingthemover atwo-yearperiodInotonly began tounderstandthembetteras
people,I moreclearlyunderstoodtheforcesthatmotivate me as a photographer.
Importantly,I had aclearer pictureoftheway I work, how preserving
dignity
is moreimportantthencreatinga photographthatwillcreate scandal. Imade an impact inthe
livesoftheyoungwomen. Ibelievethatseeingpositiveimagesofthemselves inthe
beautifultheylooked. Throughthisprojecttheyseemedtobemore connectedwiththe
school andeachother.
Thiswrittenthesisexplainsthroughresearchintothe
history
ofdocumentary
photography, myown personal
history
as aphotographer, andinsights intotheexhibitionsthemselves, how I developedthisproject,whatit looked likewhen itwas
completed,andwhatIhave learned from
doing
it. I believethatI wassuccessful becauseInotonly showedtheyoungwomen ina positivelight,but insome waysIallowedthe
girlstospeakforthemselves.
The ElementsOf
Photography
Only
throughathoroughexploration of an artisticbody
ofwork;anexplorationthatincludes
breaking
it downintotheimportantelements,does any significantunderstandingoftheworkas a wholeemerge. Thisis especiallytruewithinphotography
becauseit isa complicated mediumfull oflayersofinterpretation,meaning,and active
elements notpresentinother artforms. Thephotographitself hasphysical attributesthat
define itwhich includeamongstotherthings theframe,style, color, size,focus,time,
tone, condition,quality,and composition. Thephotographerultimately determinesall of
theseformalphotographic strategiesbasedon perceptionsformulated andreinforced
thoughalifetimeofexperiences. Oneclear example ofthecontrol a photographerhas
overmeaningwithinthephotographistheway photographyrelatesto theideaoftime.
Whilethephotographas an objectis static,itrepresents aworldthatis continually
movingandchanging. Thephotographtakesanevent,or momentintime,andthrougha
mechanical processinstantaneouslycapturesit inacompletely originalway,changing
continuallydynamic, andina stateofflux, and
isolating
a singlemoment,photography isabletochangethemeaningweassociate with thisfundamental propertyoflife.
9+fc
^jX>MMg*<
V^BBm
,W|WIW "^ ""IB
^^B
'*uw #**'..MM* J
jw^ * *y^ ** -.-J f^^^M <
J^^mJ^M y^^fc-^
hi hi
'Ir^M
;* iiHr 1
^feii
Figure 1
In photographytheideaofcapturingorstoppingmotionis completely
controllable
by
thephotographer. Howmotionis depictedcan changedepending
ontheshutter speed. Forexample, aphotograph ofaparticularsceneismadewhenthecamera
is pointedtowarda subject andthe photographerdecides how shewantstheimageto
look.
Depending
onavarietyof elements withinthesceneincluding
howmuchlightthereis,andifthesubjectis moving orstandingstill,a particularshutterspeedis chosen.
When consideringtwophotographsthatweretakenunderexactlythesame condition a
photographtakenat a shutterspeed of250thper secondis muchdifferentthanthesame
onetakenat 15thpersecond. At250thper secondthephotographismuchmore
likely
tohave capturedthemotion evenifthesubjectismoving. At 15thper secondthe subject, if
notcompletely stillwhiletheshutter was open,will most
likely
be blurredwithintheframe. Thisslightdifference inthe waya photographwas made creates an enormous
shutter speedin low naturallight,thisallowedforthelittle girl sitting in lighttoremain
infocus,whilethemansitting behind heris blurred because he wasmovingwithinthe
frame. Becauseofthisuseof motion andblurwithintheframemore oftheviewers
attentionis givento themainsubject, the littlegirl, whilethe
blurry
manbehind hercreates anuneasy
feeling
becauseyou cannotclearly seehis face. Thistechniqueofusing motion creates a mood withinthephotograph. Thephotographin figure 2 was
takenon abright sunny
day
at ahigh shutter speed. Eventhough thereisalotofmotionwithintheframeall movementis stopped sothere isnoblur. Thisgivesthephotograph
the
feeling
ofbeing
capturedintime.Figure 2
Another
inherently
photographic elementisthe use oftheframe: how aphotographerdecidestoframe somethingaffects howtheviewerinterpretsthesubject.
"Thephotographhasedgestheworlddoes
not,"
explainsStephen Shore. "The edges are
what separate whatisinthephotographfromwhatisnot"
(Shore 28). Itispart ofthe
photographer'sjobtodecide howtousethe edges ofthephotograph. Tousetheframeas
thephotograph. Theobjectsthatareimportanttothephotographerwhenmakingthe
decisionsabouthowtophotographascene aretherecipientsoftheframe's"emphasis".
Figure 3
Aframemightbeused
"actively"
by
placinga subjectclosetotheedge oftheframecausingatensionbetweenwhatis included intheframeand whatis not. Thisalso can
indicatewhatpart ofthesubjectisimportant. Forexampleyiigwre 3usestheframe
actively inordertocreatetensionandambiguitywithintheimage. Thistensionbecomes
as importantas anythingelsewithintheframe.
Forother photographs theframeis passive orneutral,andthereis nothingplaced atthe
edge ofthephotograph;it onlyrepresents where thephotographends. Forexample,
figure4,thephotographofthegirlinart class
looking
throughaframecreatestheideaofaframewithin aframe. Butit isstill a passiveframe. There is nothingcloseto theedges
causingtensionwithintheframe. Thesubjectis passivelyplaced withintheframe. Then
thereisthecombination ofthetwoideas asin figure 5. Thisphotographis fromthe
MirrorStageSeries,the titleis Mirror Stage Series XVI. Inthisphotograph youhavethe
active elementontheleftside oftheframe,thewoman'sface isrightinthecornerofthe
photograph,and ontherighthandsideofthephotographyouhavealotofemptyspace
whichis verypassive. Togethertheycreate adynamicwithintheframethatcauses
tensionand makes a statementabouttherelationship betweenthese twopeople.
Figure 5
The basic facts ina photograph canbetotally transformedafterthephotographis
made
by
anumber ofthings,including
the sequence, condition, and presentation.Anotherimportantvariable inphotographyisthe
"space"
orvenueinwhichthephotographis
besideit,"writesJohn Berger (Berger 29). This istrue tosuch an extentthateventhe
spacethatthephotographis seeninaffects how a viewerinterprets it.The photographic
image'slocation
-whetherawell-known galleryspace, anewspaper,thewallina
dentist'soffice,a
family
photoalbum,or on abillboard in Times Square-givesit
completelydifferent importanceand meaning.Forexample,thesame photograph canbe
presentedinagallery inan expensiveframe orit may be seen onthefrontof adiscarded
newspaper
lying
inthestreet. Theseconditionswillhavean effect ontheviewersandtheimportancetheyplace ontheimage. This impliesthatphotographsactivelycommunicate
withtheworld. Therefore it is extremely important forthephotographertobeaware of
her intendedmessage andhow it is changing asthelocationofthephotograph changes.
Thisbecomesa crucial elementwithintheunderstandingofthephotograph.Anexample
thework of photographerJamesNachtwey,one ofthemostimportantwar photographers
of ourtime. Inthe
documentary
War Photographer(2000)produced anddirectedby
ChristianFrei,
Nachtwey
clearlystatesthathe does notseehis workhanging
ingalleriesbutaims formasspublicationsbecause wide exposureoftheissues he is coveringwhich
heviewsas his primary purpose. ForFrei,thephotographhas itsownlife as an object
which canbe
highly
influencedby
thesurroundingelements.Obviously
thephotographitselfisnotchanging fromone environmenttothenext.Whatis changing istheviewer'sperception of whatthephotographis,and whatit is
tryingtodo. Forexampleaphotograph,of an oldwoman, sitting ina shoebox could
represent animportant memorytosomeone.
Hanging
on awall inagallerythesamephotographcouldsignifyanimportantpiece ofart,andon abillboardinthemiddle of
carrywithitanintrinsic meaningwhichwill effectthevalue placed onthephotograph
by
society. Thiseffectofanyenvironmenton meaningbrings uptheimportant issueofthe
fundamental "truth"
possible within a photograph.Theinterpretation,perceptions,even
anunderstanding ofphotography influencesthe"objective"view ofthephotograph.
Becausetheobjectivetruthwithin a photograph changes
depending
onthesurroundingenvironment; photographsbecomeevidenceofperceptionsheld
by
boththe photographerandtheviewer.
Itcouldbe furtherarguedthateveryone's perception ofwhatisinthe
photographvaries
depending
onhisorherpreviousexperiences andexpectations. Inotherwords,thevieweris notneutral. Viewers haveasubjective eye
depending
on pastexperiences,andthis hasa profoundinfluence on whatthevieweractually
"sees"
inthe
photograph. Itisthroughtheviewer'srelationshipwiththeimagethatthephotograph
gets itspower. Thereis an entire setof
"symbolic"
meaningsconnectingnotonlythe
photographerto the contextofthe environment,butthevieweraswell. Recent
psychological studies haverejectedtheideathattheactof
looking
andrecordingcan everbe entirelyneutral, passive,or objective. Itcontains and expresses relations of power and
control betweentheartist,viewer,and subject(Wells2). Communicationtheorists call
cognitivedissonancetheprocess
by
whichindividualsrejectinformationthatdoes notsupportattitudesalready heldordecisions already made. The wayaviewerlooksat a
photographcanbeskewed
by
strongly heldopinionstiedtoemotionalresponses. Inotherwords, photographsare interpretedwithinthecontext of social beliefs already held
Justthesefew examples showtheart ofphotography as a series of complicated
and activerelationships-betweenthe photograph, photographer, subject, and viewer-that
needtobetakenintoaccountinorderforthephotographic projecttobe clearly defined
andinterpreted.
My
owncreative process isaninterrelationship
betweenme,thephotographer,andtheexternal elementsthatcreate photography. Theexternalelements
including
the photograph, the subject,andtheviewer. Thatis why itisimportant for myaudiencetounderstandthateach one oftheseelements alone andinrelationtoeach of
theothershas a significant amount ofinfluenceandweight,rendering it impossibleto
considertheproject as a whole withoutthinkingabouttheseelements separately.
Documentary Photography
Photography
isa potent medium of expression.Properly
usedit isagreat powerforunderstanding.
Documentary
-Photojournalism;becauseofthetremendousaudience reached
by
publicationsusing it,hasmoreinfluenceonpublicthinkingand opinionthanany otherbranchof photography. Forthis
reasonit is importantthat thephotographerhas astrongsenseof
integrity
andtheintelligencetounderstand and presenthis subject matter accordingly.
W. EugeneSmith
Withinoursocietyphotographs areusedina number ofdifferentwaysincluding:
artistically,ongallery walls;journalistically, conveying information innewspapersor
magazines;andcommercially,to sell products. Fromtheinventionofphotography inthe
mid 1800'sthemediumhas been separatedinto many opposing traditions, "at first
betweenthe scientific and aestheticideologies, later betweenpurism andpictoralism,and
finally
aswindow vsmirror"
(Hugunin6). In her bookPhotographyAt TheDock,
photo-criticAbigail Solomon-Godeauexpressesthis tension:
"Photography
is justabouteverything...oralternatively nothingat all"
My
thesisproject,AdolescentGirls, exemplifiesthe typeofphotography knownas"documentary". Whatis
documentary
photography? Newhall defineditas,"authenticity
implicit inphotographsasrecords."
In otherwords, theverynature ofthe
photographicimagemakesitadocument. Hegoes on: "Photographs aresubjectiveand
forthat reason,powerfulcriticismsoftheimpactof an economic system onthelivesof
others"
(Newhall235). Here he is writing abouttheinfluential photographs oftheFarm
Security
Administrationas records of whathappenedduring
thedepressionera. Newhallisexpressingtheideathatphotographs are subjectiveinterpretations
by
thephotographer:notjust importantrecords,andthereforecanbeusedas awaytoinfluencechangein
society. Hefurtherstatesthatwhile
documentary
photography isneither a"record offactnor artforart's
sake"
thephotographs are "brillianttechnicallyand
highly
artistic". Attheirbest
documentary
images involveobservablefactcombinedwith creativity.imagination, anddatagathering, andsubjectivity fromabeliefsystem orphilosophy held
by
thephotographer.Thequestion"what is
documentary
photography?"
and morespecifically,"how is
it differentfromothertypes of
photography?"
leads usto thedefinitionof"document".
"Theword
'document'
canbetracedbacktoa medievaltermforanofficial
paper"
(Clarke 124). JohnGrierson firstusedthe word
"documentary"
in 1926todescribethe
kindof cinemathathewantedtoreplacethe
fantasy
filmproducedinHollywood,andthetermwas quicklyembraced
by
still photographerssearching fora phrasethatcapturedtheirquestforthe"quintessential qualityof truth"
(Wells 56). 1930Grierson directed
Drifters, afilmaboutfishermen,which laidthefoundation for
documentary
filmmaking.In his
long
careerhe has beenassociated withtheproduction ofhundredsofdocumentary
films. Itwasthroughhis dedicationto the
documentary
imagethatfuture filmmakerswhowantedtoportray something"real"founda voice. In otherwords, these
documentary
filmmakers wantedtocapturereality inaway thatjustwas not
being
addressedby
themainstreamHollywoodmovies.
In theWebsterDictionary,a"document"is definedas:
"Supplying
evidence ofreality."
Documentary
photographers are attemptingtoshow some aspect of reality. Aphotograph isafter all
fundamentally
adocument. The camera makes a record atthemoment of exposure aseverything withintheangle ofthelens isrecorded on light
sensitive emulsionor,morerecently, onamemorycardthroughdigitaltechnology. The
concept of not
interfering
with, orchangingascene, isessentialformosttraditionaldocumentary
photographers,whichdirectly
relatestothe"authenticity"ofthephotograph.
Traditionally
a reference pointforwhether aphotographwasconsideredadocumentary
photographis basedon its "authenticity". However,thisassumption ofauthenticity entirely deniestheinfluencethat thephotographerhaswhilecreatingthe
photograph.
Directing
theelementsthatcreate a photographisan essential part ofphotography. "Therefore,
'documentary'
as a
defining
termis misleading because itplays ontheassumptionthatphotography hasanabilitytorecordtheobjectivetruth
withouttheinfluence of subjectiveinterpretation,"writesMarien, "Current
documentary
photographersconsidertheideaof completetruth withinphotography as an unrealizable
goal"
(Marien 449). Notedarthistorian John Burgeragrees.
"Every
image, even'documentary'
images,embodies a particularwayof
seeing"
hewrites. 'This becomes
photographermade consciousdecisionsto take thisphotographina particularwayout of
aninfinite set of
possibilities"
(Berger 10).
Giventhis
interplay
betweendocumenting
realityand subjectiveexpression,documentary
photography is profoundlycomplex and multi-layeredbasedon manysociallyconstructedideologies. In A World
History OfPhotography
Rosenblum definesdocumentary
photographyasembracingtwogoals: "the depictionof verifiablesocialfactandtheevocation ofempathywiththe subject"
(Rosenblum 384). Walker Evensstates
that,
"Documentary
isa sophisticated andmisleadingword... thetermshouldbedocumentary
style ...document hasause,whereas artis reallyuselessanddocumentary
photography fallssomewhereinthemiddle."
Lewis Hineexplainedthe photograph's
goalswhenhestated, "Lightisrequiredtoilluminatethedarkareasof social
existence."
Itis an
interesting dichotomy
betweenfactandsubjectivity because manyargumentsarise aboutthebasictruthfulnessofa
documentary
imagewhen much ofitspower comesfromthesubjectivity
directly
connectedto thephotographer's particular view.Eventhoughit isclearthatobjectivitywithinphotography is underquestion,it
can bearguedthatphotographsarein some respectsabletorepresenttangiblefacts. For
example,ifthereisaredball in frontofthelensofa camera and a photographismade,
noone canarguethata redball willnotappearinthephotograph. Butwecannot
generalizeto thepointthatallredballs look exactly likethisone orthatthisredballis in
factthe"average"ofalltheredballs.
The primaryrole of a
documentary
photographeris educationthroughunderstandingsothereshouldalways bethoughtfulnessand respectforsubjects.
especiallywhen
investigating
somethingthatisdisturbing
ordegrading,becausethephotographersare presentingsomethingdifficulttoview. Themoredifficultthesubject
matter,themoreimportant itis forthephotographertobeguided
by
morality. Thequestion ofmorality or ethics within
documentary
photographyis extremely importantbecauseofthepower ofthephotographicimageandtheimportancewe place onwhatit
showswithinour society.
Withinthis context, the
history
ofdocumentary
photographycontainsthreetensions. Above, I discussedthetensionbetween subjectiveimpressionand objective
reality. Now ina short
history
I will considerthetension betweendocumentary
workandphotojournalism, andthe tensionbetweenart and
documentary
photography.A Short
History
The
documentary
traditionwithinphotography,especially intheUnited States,generallyrefers tophotographsspecifically madefroma
"humanistic" or
"social" point
of view. Thistraditionbegins withJacob Riis (1849-1914). He began hiscareer as a
police reporterand throughhisexperiencesbecameasociallyconsciousjournalist. In his
book How The Other
Half
Lives(1890)Riisproducedbothavisual and written accountofthe
living
conditions in NewYork's Lower East Side whichrevealedthehorriblepoverty inwhich UnitedStates immigrantswereforcedtolive. The imageswerevery
powerfuldocumentsthatdepictedthedegradationand waste oflives. Therewere
particularlypowerful imagesof childrenwhowereforcedtoliveand workinstaggering
conditionsofpoverty. Oneoftheimportant
documentary
elements wasthefactthat theimportant
documentary
element, thephotographs motivated social changebecauseofthehorrible imagestheydepicted. Thephotographer'sinitialresponseto thesubject, the
photograph asan objectitself,andtheviewer's response of social actioniswhat created
the
"documentary
photograph."Thistraditioncontinued withLewis Hine (1874
-1940)whodeclared himselfa
"sociological photographer."
Hewas a sociologist whoonlyusedphotography in his
research,hethoughtphotographywasvery powerfulformofcommunication. Initially,
hewanted toshowthelivesoftheunderprivileged in New York City. Hewas nota
photographerforphotography's sake,ratheritwasmerelya meanstoanend. He
believedthat
documentary
photographyshould nothave any kind of artisticpurpose, thattherewas no placefor it intheworldof art. Its bestuse was asa powerfulwaytochange
people's minds aboutsocial conditions. Althoughhe felt very strongly aboutthisatthe
time it isobviousthattoday,over
fifty
yearslater,hiswork reflectsone ofthe tensionswithin
documentary
photography becausenowit isconsidered art. The George EastmanHouse inRochester,NewYork,hasalarge collection ofhisnegativesintheirpermanent
archiveandin 1998 heldanexhibitionintheirgalleryofhis work. Withinthisrole as art
hisphotographs movebeyond
being
"documents"
of atimeand placeintothecreative
expressionofanartist(Clark54).
The
documentary
traditionreceivedaboost inthe 1930's. Undertheauspices oftheFarm
Security
Administration, abranch oftheUnited StatesGovernment,photographs were made
by
someoftheleading
Americanphotographers including:ArthurRothstein,TheoJung,Ben Shahn,WalkerEvans,DorotheaLange,CarlMydans,
(Rosenbloom379). Director,
Roy
Strykersaw photographyas awayofgatheringevidenceoftheimpactoftheGreat Depression and
documenting
theaverageAmerican.Many
oftheseimages have becomeiconsofAmerican history. Atthevery leasttheyhave maintained a placein American
history
and are a valuable record ofthedepressionera. "One ofthemost recognizableimagesofthisperiodis Dorothea Lange'sMigrant
Mother (1934). Itwas chosen
by
Strykerasthephotographtosymbolizetheconcernofthegovernmentforthedisplacedfarmers,"
writes Rosenbloom (Rosenbloom 369). It is
clearly animagethatrepresents abalance betweendocument, beauty,art,andsocial
concern.
Anotherphotographerfromthistime, MargaretBourke-Whitecreatedimagesthat
raise questions abouttheideaof
integrity
withindocumentary
photography. Inher bookHave You Seen Their Faces?sheshotverypersonalphotographs,changingnames and
locationsforthe sake of anonymity. Otherphotographers
describing
themselvesasdocumentary
photographersworkingatthesametimeas Margaret Bourke-Whitedistancedthemselvesfrom her because theideaoftruthwas crucialtotheirwork.
Arecent exhibition entitled"Bronzeville: BlackChicago inPictures,
1941-1943"
provides anotherexample ofhow
documentary
photographycanbe important inrecordingatimeandplace,and alsohaveanimportantplaceintheart world. Held in
April 2003atThe International Center For
Photography
theexhibitionincludeddocumentary
imagesmadeby
theFarmSecurity
AdministrationphotographersRusellLee, EdwinRosskam,JohnVachon,andJack Delano. In his bookwhichaccompanied
theexhibition,Stange stated:
They
produced over1000documentary
imagesofChicago's South Sideinthecommunity. Chicago's South Side is seven miles
long
as well astwomiles wide,wasthecapital ofblack America inthe 1940s hometosuch people asJoeLewis,
MahaliaJackson, CongressmanWilliamDavison,Defender Newspapereditor
John Songstacke,
Ebony
MagazineeditorJohn H. Johnson,andtheNationOfIslam leader Elijah Muhammad. The photographs are ofcitystreetsand
sidewalks,prosperousmiddle- class
businesses,cabarets,andovercrowded 'Kitchenette'
neighborhoodswhere
dirty
poormigrantsfromthedeep-southstruggletosurvive ( Stange 4).
Documentary
photographycontinuedtodevelop
throughout the twentiethcentury.Robert Frank in his book The Americans(1958)redefined
documentary
photography intermsofhis radicallypersonal style and philosophy. His original styleincludeda
self-awareness abouttherole ofthephotographer andher intention inthe photographic
process. Inhisviewwhatthephotographerwastryingtosayaboutthe subjectbecame
moreimportantthan the subjectitself. He usedAmericanicons in hisphotographsina
waythatcontrastedsharplywiththefactsofthe 1950'sin America. Theiconswere
supposedtorepresentAmericaofthefifties. Hecontrastedthemwith whathe actually
observed ashewastravelingacrossAmerica. "Sotheautomobiles andtelevisionsets
becameconduits of aninsidiouscommercialismthatwasprofoundly alienating
individuals fromeachotherandthewider
society,"
writesMarien. "Therewas asensein
hisphotographs ofunfulfilledlivesand spirituallyvacant environments ofthepostWorld
WarIIperiod. The soul-damaged population somewherebetweenviolence,ignorance,
and
despair"
(Marien 344). He shotimagesofbleaknessand sadnessinacountry
determinedtoignore anythingthatwas not considered
"moral" or
"good."
Thiswas a
very importantconceptual
leap
inthedocumentary
tradition thatwas, tothis pointinhistory, tryingtoaccuratelyrecordeverythingthathappened withminimalinfluence from
Robert Frankledtheway in understandingthat therecouldbe manypossible
meaningswithinaphotograph. His bookwasadirectattack onAmericaand stoodin
sharpcontrasttotheFamily
Of
Manexhibition organizedby
Edward Steichen in 1955attheMuseum Of Modern Art in New YorkCity. Thisexhibition wasconsideredthe
quintessential
documentary
exhibitionbecause it illustrated thehumanconditionusingstill photographs. "The
Family
ofManexhibitionbroughttogetherover500photographsby
many differentphotographersfrom 68countries,"
writesRosenbloom. "The
photographsdepictedan 'essentialoneness of mankindthroughout theworld'. A variety
ofuniversalthemesand cultures wereillustrated"(Rosenbloom 483). Itwas a
cross-section of
humanity
but didnothavethe critical eye ofFrank'swork. Seenincontrast,theworkisas oppositeinnature as youcanget.
Robert Frank didnot care aboutthefineprintor presentation ofthephotograph.
Hisprints were gritty,tilted, blurredandcompletelyunpremeditated(Marien344).
Becauseofthespontaneityandenergy in hisworkhe broughta new excitementand
originality into photographythatwas
long
overdue.Along
withW. Eugene Smith,WilliamKlein,LeonardFreed,
Gerry
Winogrand,JimAlinder,andBillOwens, Frank'swork rewrotethetermsofreferencefor American
documentary
photography. Inhisnewestbook Hold Still...
Keep Going
(2001), Frankpushestheideaof"documentary"
evenfurtherashe describes putting down hiscameraforamovie camerabecause he
could askthepeoplewhoweresitting in frontofthislens whattheythoughtinsteadof
just
inferring
it. He believesthatthisis a moredirectandless obscure approach.Frankalsostatesthathe doesnotbelievein capturingadecisivemoment; rather
ThisviewcontrastssharplywithHenriCarrier-Bressonwhois amongthemost
influential
documentary
photographers ofthe twentiethcentury. Cartier-Bresson believesin thedecisive moment,intheideathat the
documentary
photographerfinds everythinginthe world;thephotographeronly hastowaitforthe decisivemoment wheneverything
comestogether. Hewrotein his book The Decisive Moment (1952):
Formethecameraisasketchbook,aninstrumentofintuitionandspontaneity,the
master oftheinstantwhich,invisualterms,questions anddecidessimultaneously.
Inorderto 'give a
meaning'
totheworld,onehastofeeloneselfinvolved inwhat
oneframesthrough the viewfinder. Thisattitude requiresconcentration,a
disciplineofmind, sensitivity,anda sense ofgeometry- it is
by
greateconomyof meansthatone arrives atsimplicity of expression. Onemust alwaystake
photographswiththegreatest respectforthesubject andforoneself. Totake
photographs meanstorecognize
-simultaneously andwithin afractionof a
second- both
thefact itselfandtherigorous organizationofvisuallyperceived
forms thatgive itmeaning. Itis puttingone's head,one'seye,and one'shearton
thesame axis. (Bresson 16)
Whetheror not
documentary
photography in fact"documents" reality, it haschangedtheunderstandingof
history
inthe 19thand20thcenturies. Withinthe20thcentury,
documentary
photography, through technological advancesand practical uses,visualized
history
asa seriesof eventsthatspeak ofthecomplexities ofhumanexperience. Farfrom
being
passivewitnesses, photographsoftenbecame directors intheway historicalevents were seen. Thisraisesa secondtensionwithin
documentary
work:whenisitdocumentary,and whenisitphotojournalism?
ForexampleEddieAdamsworked as aphotojournalist
during
theVietnam War.His Pulitzer Prize winning imageofa man atthemomentofdeathnotonlychangedthe
faceoftheVietnamWar but America's involvement inall warsinthefuture. Itwasthe
firsttimethatawide publicaudiencehadwitnessed,inthephotographicimage, the
of names andnumbers. Powerful photographslikethisonebroughttheattention ofthe
wartotheAmericanpublic. Inanotherexample,thephotographer
Hung
Cong'sphotographAccidentalNapalm Attack(1972) presented a moral condemnation ofthe
VietnamWarandhas beenone ofthemost reproducedimagesin history. His image
introducestheideasand complexities ofmoralitywithin
documentary
photography.When should photographerstakephotographs and when shouldtheyputdowntheir
cameras andbecomeinvolved? Aretheremoments when it is inappropriateto
photograph?
Thenegative implicationsassociatedwith
documentary
photographydirectly
relatestothefactthat
"photography
wasborn inthe daysofthe 'BritishEmpire' whenphotographywas usedtocaptureimages of'nativepeople'
whichonlyconfirmed views
ofthemastheother"
(Wells 97). That is how
documentary
photographers are associatedwithtakingpictures of peoplefrom differentculturesfromtheirown.
Historically
thiswasparticularly
damaging
because photography "claimedtobeabletocreateobjective,scientific recordswhich werefree frombias" (Wells 85). Thepeople seeninthe
photographsbecame representativesof entiregroups,and were usedtoclassify entire
racesof people.
Unfortunately
thisnegative useofphotographshas followedthetradition ofphotographythroughouthistory. Itisarguedthatphotography has beenused
as awayofconsumingtheworldina mannerthatgivesboththephotographer and
viewerpoweroverit.
One entitythat
fully
understandsthepower of"photojournalistic"documentary
photographswastheUnited StatesGovernment.
During
thefirst Gulf WarGeorge H. W.photographerswerenot allowedtophotograph whattheywantedto,only whatthe
military saidtheycould. BecauseoftheAmericanpublic's responseto theextreme
censorshipimposed
by
theUnited States Governmentduring
theGulfWar, theAmericanpublicfelt stronglythat the government wastryingtohide something.
During
his lectureattheNew York Historical
Society
inMay
2002, PeterTurnely
discussedwhatitwaslike
being
a photojournalistduring
theGulf War: "Itwasextremelyfrustrating, we werebeing
watchedconstantly and wewerebeing
kept fromtheaction. Noone wasallowedtomake photographs
freely during
theGulf War. Therewas always atleasttwomilitarypeoplewithus at all times...thegovernmentwastryingtocontrolthemedia andthespin
that thewarwas
making."
Fromthebeginning,tensionshave existed around whether
documentary
photography depicts
"reality"
and whatdifferentiates it fromphotojournalism. Another
tensionexists aroundwhetheror not
documentary
photography is "art". Ifphotographsarereally created
by
the photographer and not objectiverecordsthen isdocumentary
photographyart? Intheearly 1900's Alfred Stieglitz brought photography intomuseums
andgalleries, tocreate an atmosphereinwhichthephotographic printwouldbeas
commonin an artgallery as apainting or sculpture.
Today
therearecountless examplesof photographic"art". The Civil War,forinstance,wasthemostdocumentedwar ofits
day
becauseofthetechnical advanceswithin photography. Eventhoughatthetime thesephotographs were
being
made as puredocumentsofevents,today they are consideredvaluablecollector'sitems and are presentin alargenumberofimportantcollections. In
anotherexample, atChristy's Auction House in April 1999,a
Timothy
O'SullivanO'Sullivan'ssubjective view ofthe world? We know thattheyare not pure objective
representationsof reality. Becausethey are aninterpretation ofreality basedon
someone'ssubjectiveview,wecan thenconcludethattheyare importantbothas art and
as
documentary
evidenceof events.Anotherexampleis Matthew Brady's military groupportraits which always
conformtomilitary
hierarchy
withthegeneral asthecenter of attention inthemiddle ofthephotograph. This isa good example of a subjectivedocument. Mr.
Brady
waslimitedto theacceptedformulaoftheday. Hecould not,forexample,putthegeneralat
theend ofthelineontheoutskirts ofthephotograph. Thiswouldhave beenseen as a
direct insultto thegeneral,and
by
extension, theUnited States military,renderinganimagethat was notsociallyacceptable. Inotherwords,while
documenting
the officers,Brady
was alsoproducing an"artistic"
work withinthelimitsofthatsociety andhis
vision. Withinhisown aestheticshe hadtoconsideracceptedsocial normsthatin some
waysdictateda conventionalformtohim.
Understanding
the timeperiod and society inwhichtheimageswere made is invaluable in
determining
therealitywithinthephotographsthemselves. Withoutthisknowledgea completeunderstandingofthe
photographis lost.
Fromthebeginning,manycritics blurredthedistinction between
documentary
and artphotography
by
placingfineartphotographers withinthedocumentary
tradition.Forexample,Eugene Atget (1857
-1927)isconsideredthefatherofEuropeanmodern
documentary
photography. Hisworkfigured intheearly exhibitsestablishingmodernphotographyas art: thefirst Independentsalonofphotography in France(1928),for
(Featherstone41). Intheyears 1898- 1914Atget
soldimagesofParistoarchitects,
decorators,
publishers,andartists. More oftenthennothe was selfdirected, notcommissioned,andonly soldhisphotographs aftertheywere made. "Hewasextremely
interestedin recreatingaParisofthe
past,"
writes Rosenbloom,"not just recordingParis,
but
instilling
itwithanartistic eye. Hemade closeups,long
shots,details, viewsfrommany differentangles ofthesamethingatmany differenttimesoftheday."
(Rosenbloom279) Atgetwas not well knownatthetime ofhisdeath, but Bernice Abort
broughtthousandsofhisphotographs to theattention oftheMuseumofModern Art.
While Atgetcreated photographs withthe intentionofmakingart,other
documentary
photographers were brought intotheartworld
by
galleries andcollectors. MarianneFulton,senior scholar oftheGeorge Eastman House in Rochester New Yorkstates,
"people like Brassai andKertesz andCartier-Bresson have beenwelcomed
by
theartestablishment."
Thiswelcomehasnotbeen entirelyeasy,however. Theseand other
well-known
documentary
photographers have been "soappropriatedby
theart world andwithin
society,"
writes Eskin,"thatyouhavetorememberthatwhentheywereactually
makingthephotographstheywere professional workingphotographers. These
photographers didnot considerthemselves asartists;they werenotmakingthe
photographs as pieces of arttobe
hung
in galleriesbuttobe usedinsomekindofsocialcontext"
(Eskin 105). In March2002,theInternationalCenterof
Photography
in NewYork
City
opened The Rise ofthe PicturePress, ashow of classic photojournalismimagesfromthe 1920'sand 1930's.
"Documentary
workthatwasdone 30or40yearsagowas notdone asfineart,but it has lifeasfine art,"
dealer, who sold a 180-pictureportfolio ofmid-centurystreetphotography
by
membersofthePhotoLeagueto theColumbus MuseumofArt inColumbus, Ohio(Eskin 104).
A currenttrendin
documentary
photography supportstheideaofphotographyasartistic perception ordescription, notfact. Forexample, NanGoldin'sbook Ballad
Of
Sexual
Dependancy
is ahighly
personal account ofher lifeandfriends' livesduring
the1970's, 1980'sand 1990's. Anotherexample is RichardBillingham's book Ray's A
Laugh, anintimate documentofhis family. Thephotographs arecolor,taken with a
cheappoint and shootcamera,and printed at a one-hourlab.
Withinafewweeks afterthe terrorist'sattackontheWorld Trade Center in New
York
City
onSeptember 11, 2001,avacant storefrontonPrince Street in lowerManhattan becamean interactivegallery. The digitalprints were availableforsaleat$
25 each. Theprofitsfromthesale ofthephotographs weredonatedto thevictimsofthe
tragedy. Thebook This Is New Yorkwaslatercreatedfromtheimages inthisproject.
Thisisan example of a symbiotic relationship betweenthe traditional meaningof
documentary
photography,as arecorderofevents,andtheconceptoftraditionalart asviewedintheartgallery,astheviewersbecametherecorders ofhistory,andthe
recordersbecametheartists. PeterGalassi,curatorofphotographyattheMuseumof
Modern Artstates,"Themostinteresting,mostsuccessful,and mostimaginative
responsetothe September 1 1 tragedywithinallthe visual arts camefrom
photojournalism" (Eskin 101).
Atfirsttheideaof"beauty" was conceived as one ofthegreatestdangers fora
documentary
photographer.According
toFeatherstone,manyphotographers thought that"bringing
beauty
wherethereis ugliness makeslightof criticalissues"
Becauseofthis thereisastronganti-aesthetics and anti-elitist movementintheearly
documentary
tradition. Amore recent view dictatesthateven thoughdocumentary
isnotaboutaesthetics,thephotographhastobeappealingenoughtoattractviewers, basedona
social construct ofwhat
beauty
is.According
to this view, thebeauty
ofthe photographfundamentally
makestheviewer acknowledgetheimportanceofthesubject matter.Theideaof
beauty
inthedocumentary
image is basedontheideathatwearetrainedfrom
infancy
tobeattractedtobeautifulthingsandto turnawayorbe repelledby
uglythings. So, eventhoughwithinthe
documentary
traditionthere isthebasic principleofanti-aesthetics,it is reallyall aboutaesthetics, employedtocapturetheaudience's
attention. Forexample, Eugene Richards,aworld-renowned
documentary
photographer,printsbeautiful,largeprintsfor histravelingexhibitions. He believesthatifthe
photograph wasugly orhadunattractiveaesthetics,no onewouldbe interested inthe
subject matterofthephotograph. Thephotograph would ultimately beunappealing.
Vicki
Goldberg
statesinan article aboutRichardsthat, " ... no one can quitepin downwhat makes a photographer seek outnursing homes andblindmenandbabies
dying
ofAIDS tomakethemsomehowbeautiful, somehowcomprehensible, somehow visibleto
thosewho were notthereandwouldnot,perhapsevencouldnot,look if Gene Richards
didnot showthe
way"
(Goldberg
2004).Inanotherexample,Sebastiao Salgado's book Workers(1993),alandmark book
ofmodern
documentary
photography,containsbeautifully
reproducedblackand whiteprintsthatdrawthereaderintothesubject matter. Eventhoughthesubjectis"ugly"or
"difficult to see"
by
many viewer's standardstheuglinessis portrayedinan"artistic"feelmore secure
inviting
them tocontemplatenotonlythephotographbutalsothesubjectitself. If Salgado didnottake
interesting
photographs people wouldbe lessinterestedinwhathewastryingtosay. Ifthephotographsdid notcomply withthe
acceptedsense of
beauty
inframing,vision andunderstanding,itwouldbe mucheasiertolook away fasterandentirely dismisstheimageandtherefore the subjectmatter. Inthis
waySalgado usesthe"art" ofhisphotographstopromotetheir"documentary"nature.
Anotheraspect ofthe"documentary-art" tensionconcernsthe qualityoftheprint.
Mary
Ellen Mark,a well knowndocumentary
photographer,is veryconcernedwiththequalityofthefineprint. "She doesexpectittobe
beautifully
printed,"writesFulton,"and
toreflectthe tonalrange presentinthe negative,asabad print can ruintheimpactof a
photograph,shefeelsa good printis
essential"
(Fulton 14). As Markexpressesit: "I
wantto takestrong
documentary
photographsthatare as goodtechnicallyas anyofthebesttechnicalphotographs,and as creative asany ofthebestfine-artphotographs. That's
whatIwant. And certainlyagoodprintis part ofthat".
Inthe end, to answerthequestionofwhether
documentary
photography isart,weneedtolookatthenature of art andphotographyastwounique categoriesthatmerge
together. Intheearly part ofthe twentiethcentury Alfred Stieglitzraisedphotography's
statustoart
by introducing
it intothegallery space andtreatingthephotographitselfasan
"object"
of art. Traditional documentaryphotography falls intothe
"straight"
photographycategory. Isitstillart? I believe itisalso art.
Documentary
photographyThe
Relationship
Between theDocumentary
PhotographerandHer SubjectAnother issueraised
by
AdolescentGirlsisthecomplexrelationshipbetweenphotographerandsubject. Henri Cartier-Bressonhasexplainedthisrelationshipas
follows: "... acertain
identity
ismanifestinalltheportraitstakenby
onephotographer.Thephotographeris searching forthe
identity
ofhissitter,and alsotryingtofulfillanexpression ofhimself. Thetrue portrait emphasizes neitherthesuave northegrotesque,
butreflectsthepersonality."
The relationship between thephotographer andthesubject
isfarmore problematic cross-culturallythanwithin asingle culture. Initsworstform
photographydehumanizes, victimizes,and stereotypesgroupsofpeople,anditcanbe
usedas atool ofpropaganda. "Thephotographisa screenupon which wider socialforces
becomevisible,forexample,racism exists and photographymakesit
visible," states
Wallis (Wallis 111). Forexample, Eugene
Richards'
bookDorchesterDays(2000)
documentstheracistBostonneighborhood hegrewup in. Hewrote:
DorchesterDaysspeaksclearlyenough aboutgrowing up inaraciallycharged
andchanging inner city neighborhood. DorchesterDayswas begun,I suppose,
upon myreturn a bitfucked upanddisappointed fromyearsdownsouthas a
socialworker/activist. Unemployed,
having
returnedtoDoratheaandtheneighborhoodI escaped, I began photographing- whatwasinfrontofme
...
mine was a notablebirthplace with racistSouthBostonnextdoor. In 1974
-75
thereoccurredin South Boston aviolent resistancetoschool
bussing
thatwouldhavemadeGeorge WallaceandtheKKKproud. I havethephotographsto tell
thismelevolant story. EugeneRichards
Ifthephotographerhasanideaofthesubjectorhas preconceivednotions, this
will berepresentedinthework.
Nothing
demonstratesthismoreclearlythan theearlyphotographsoftheBritishexplorers in AfricaandIndia. Throughadvanceswithin
photographytheEuropeanexplorers were abletousethenew mediumofphotographyto
photographersdidthisinthewaythattheyusedphotographytoaccentuatethe
differences betweenthecultures.
They
posedthepeoplewithinthephotographicframeandthusdeterminedwhattheyconveyed aboutthecultures upontheirreturntoEurope,
whereEuropeanswould usethisinformationastheironlysource ofinformationabout
entire groups of people.
Early
commercial photographerswho capitalizedontravelphotographs realizedthatthemoreexcitingtheimageswerethemoretheycould sell,so
theywantedtomakethesubjectsinthephotographs seemexcitingand dangerousoften
posingthemandgivingthempropsthatpropagated myths.
"According
tothisviewthediversity
ofhumanbeings'physicalcharacteristicswastakenas evidence ofthefactof
racial differences,"statesWallis (Wallis 2). The waythat these earlyphotographers
definedanddetermined photographyinfluenceswhatwas
being
photographed andthewaythat the photographisviewedtoday.
Morerecently,as audienceshave becomemore educated and more aware ofthe
probleminherent in
documenting
othercultures, it has becomea central questioninthevalueofmany
documentary
projects. Thisaudience awarenesshappenedwhentheeditors ofTime Magazine darkened O.J. Simpson's skin colorina cover photographin
June 1994. "Readerseverywhererecognizedboththenature ofthealteration andthe
intendedracialized connotationthata person ofdarkerskinis more
likely
tobeacriminal,"
writesWells (Wells 1 1 1). This inherentsocial racismisbothcreated
by
andexpressedthroughthephotographicimage.
FilmmakerJim
McKay
addressed this tensionduring
an open discussion at theFilmForumon
May
25,2001, abouthisfilm OurSong
thatfollowsthreeadolescent girlsdifficulty
being
a white directorentering ablackandHispanicworld,andhow wouldyourespond to criticism that you're an outsider/ voyeur
depicting
a world that's not yourown?"
Heanswered:
The criticism is only validifit speaks to specifics. If I'm inaccurate I shouldbe
called on it. It's bullshit that I don't have a right to tell the story.
My
responsibility is to tell it with respect, truthfulness, and a lot of hard work.... However I do recognize my outsider status, and do everything I can to check
myself. I don't take it lightly, and I do my collaboration and research very
seriously. (Anonymousflyer)
The ideathatphotographs aredocumentsoftheworld asabsolutetruth obviously
ignorestheentire cultural and socialbackgroundagainstwhichtheimagesweretaken
justasitrendersthephotographers asneutral, passive,andinvisible (Clarke 1 12). A
successful photographisalways a reflection of a specific point ofview. Inother words
thephotographerhasatheory aboutasubject and what she wantstosayabouta situation
before shooting begins. Thisconceptisshapedfrom herpersonal history,experiences,
relationships,andpreviously heldviewsofherrole.EugeneRichards, oneofthemost
respectedAmericanphotojournalists,saidthathecouldnevertrustphotography. "You
won'tcatchhim sayingthat themediumis
truth,"
commentedGoldberg.
"Photography
canlettheideas looseand startthediscussion, but hedoesn't believeyou can change
anything, thoughyoucandothebestyou
can"
(Goldberg
2004).Thus animportant influence in creating a photographisthe photographer's own priorities
andherunderstandingofhowherexpressionofthe subject relatestothose priorities
Adolescent
GirlsThePhotographer
ThephotographicprojectAdolescentGirls, lies entirelywiththe"photographer";
itwasconceived,funded,and producedsolely
by
me. Itis essentialtounderstandthephotographerinordertounderstandtheprojectandthephotographs.
I 1990received a BachelorofScience degree in
Psychology
from Wayne StateUniversity.
My
continued interest in humannature, socialpsychology,andrelationshipsis astrongmotivation in myphotographs. While Iwas atuniversity, Ipickedupa
cameraforthefirsttimeandI became
immediately
hooked. I knewthatIwantedtodothis"thing,"whateveritwas,fortherestofmy life. So I soldeverything Iowned and I
movedtoSouthAfrica. The country my fatherwasborn inandleftinthesixties.
Growing
up I heardalotaboutSouth Africaandfeltthedisplacementofhaving
to live inanothercountrywithout an extended
family
orsense ofcommunity. In part,I returnedtoSouth Africatofindout whatmy father had been talkingabout,tounderstandhimbetter,
andwhatitmeantto bea whiteSouth African. Politically,itwas avery
interesting
timein South Africa. IarrivedjustafterNelson Mandelawas releasedfrom prison onRobben
When Iarrivedin South Africa I didnothave anyworkbutwantedtouse
photographyin asociallyrelevantwayso Icreated a projecttakingphotographs of
children
living
onthestreets ofCape Town fora research project attheUniversity
oftheWestern Cape. Atthelaunch ofthe project,ImettheDirectoroftheNational Street Law
Project,aUnitedStates basedhumanrights organization. Hegave me ajobas a
documentary
photographer withinhisorganization. Figure 6 is froma projectIcompletedfor Street Law onhumanrightsfor farmworkers. Fromthisjob I got other
assignments working for humanrightsorganizationsin South Africa. Figure 7is froma
projectI did foran oral historianatthe
University
ofDurbin inruralSouth Africa.During
thefirstnational democraticelectionsI workedfor USAIDandProject Voteonvoterrights and education.
My
photographs werebeing
usedtoteachfirsttime voters,especially thosepeople who could not read orwrite, howtocasttheirfirst ballot.
Figure 7
Iworked as afreelancephotographerin South Africa from 1993 - 1998.
By
1998,workingon projectsin "highrisk"
conditions away fromotherphotographershadleftme
awayfromAmericafor fiveyears. Irealizedthatitwastimetoeither putdown
permanentroots in South Africaormovebackto theUnited States. I alsowantedtime to
concentrateonbecomingabetterphotographer. Asa creativeperson, Ithoughtitwas
essential tofind myownvoice within mywork andIcould notdothatwhileI was
working forotherpeople. Ilearnedwhatmy employerslikedanddidnotlike,andI
beganto shootfortheirtastesand notmyown. So,Iappliedtograduate school and
movedbackto the UnitedStates.
Figure8
IcametoRochester InstituteofTechnology inthefall of 1998. I lovedthe
freedomandspace graduate school providedmeto workonmyown workand expand
myknowledgeofphotography.
My
first WalkThrough(attheend ofeachtermduring
thefirstyearoftheMasterofFine Arts DegreeattheRochester Instituteof
Technology
thereis a
day
longexamination andinvestigationofthestudent's work meanttofurthertheideasandunderstandingoftheartist as a person andthe
body
ofworkas awhole)was all about
discovering
thefreedomthatgraduate schoolprovided. Itriedtofitwordswallwithmaskingtapeand glueandwrote withblackpaintrightovertheprint. The
photographitself became unimportant. Iwas interested in
breaking
the constraintsandboundariesthatI had feltas aworkingphotographer. I wantedtoplay withextremes,to
discoverwhatwas possible,andthencome backtosomething different. Figure 8 isan
exampleofmyfirsttermCoreclass and was a part ofmyfirstWalk Through. It
illustratestheneedI hadtobreak awayfromtheconstraints ofmy previouswork.
Figure9
Afterthefirst Walk Through Iwenthome for
Thanksgiving
break. I felt isolatedfrom myfamily, becausethiswasmy first
holiday
wehad spenttogetheras afamily
sincemyreturnfrom Africa.
My
immediatefamily
consists ofmymother,father,andolderbrothers,MartinandPaul,andMartin'swife,Julia. Irealizedhowmuchthe
family
dynamics andmyrolehadchanged sincemy departure. Morespecifically,Irealizedhow
much I hadchanged
during
my stay in Africa. Allof a suddenI wentfrombeing
a childinthefamilytoan adult with an adult role. So I startedtophotographmyparents as a
waytounderstandthechanges withinmy primary
family
andas awaytobring
themclosertome. Figure9 isthefirst imageI madeforthis
body
ofwork. ItisanimageIabout. Itwasaproject we could all actuallywork ontogether. Itwas also a project
whereIcould
"safely"
workwiththeideas Iwas
learning
intheclassroom andincorporatetheminto mywork.
Figure 10
When Ireturned and developedthese photographs, they spoketosomethingthatI
wantedto say,notonlyaboutthatspecificrelationshipbutabout relationships ingeneral.
After I lookedatthe photographs,I became extremelyinterestedin gestures and
body
language,andhowweinferthingsabout peoplethroughnonverbal elements. Ialso
became interested intheperceptions wehave of peoplebasedontheir
body
language:how theystand, walk, sit,and move andhowwe communicatethrough nonverbal
communication. I startedmakingphotographs ofmyownrelationshipand
laying
themoutrandomlymixingthemwiththephotographs ofmy parents. Figure 10is a
photographI made ofmy boyfriendand meforthisproject. When Imixedthe
photographsuptherewas ananonymitythatwascreatedbetweenthecouples and
individuals: theviewer was not sure who was who or whichcouple itwas,andthe
boundarieswereblurredandextendedbeyondanyspecific couple. I wantedtoextend
ambiguitytheaudiencecouldrelatetowhattheywere seeing. Thephotographsbeganto
havetheanonymitythatIwas strivingfor. When Iwenthome for ChristmasandNew
YearIcontinuedworkingontheproject,photographingmyparents and myselfin my
new role. Atthis timemy imageswere
becoming
alotmorelayeredwithmeaning.Withintheframeworkofthis projectmyphotographs weregainingalotmore depth.
Figure11
My
second Walk Through in March 1999consisted oftwo4x5 grids madeoutof16x20 fiber based blackand whiteprints
documenting
myfamily
andrelating itto theinfluenceonmynew relationship. Figure11 is aninstillationphotographfrom my
second Walk Through. Further,I wantedtoexploretheideaoftruthandthenarrative
withinthe visualdocument. I struggledwiththequestionofthewaythenarrative
element within
documentary
photography dictatesanunderstandingof"truth". Theprojectdevelopedinto a complex exploration ofinterpersonalcommunicationthrough
bodylanguageand gesture. Throughthisinvestigation, Icametorealizethat
relationshipsarenotjustonething,theyare not"good"or "bad"
butconsistof avery
rhythmic,notstatic,continually changingovertimeand space. Withinthis
body
ofwork,it is importantthatimages playoff of each otherinadynamicway,
forming
patterns andmeaningwhichforcetheaudiencetocreatethenarrative ratherthan thephotographer.
^
W
I
K3P
x
r^S
J
m~**
?
Lim&2i
<*A
*
jaw-**
i
Figure 12
After mysecond Wa/Through, I knew thatI wasn'tfinishedwiththis project;I
neededtospend more time photographingand researching. So I kepttakingphotographs
ofmyparents andmyself andpushedtheboundaries of comfort.Attheend ofmy first
yearatRochester Instituteof
Technology
intheSpring
of 1999for my final WalkThroughI created awall of photographs(inadoublestudio) whichwould nothavea
beginning,middle or end. Figure 12 isaninstillation photographfrom my final Walk
Through. I alsotookthephotographs offofthewalland
hung
fragmentsofthelargerimages fromtheceiling. I put afan inthestudio sotheywouldcontinuallymove and
playoffofthephotographs onthewall. Theviewerhadtolookthroughthe
hanging
imagestoseethephotographs onthewall. I enjoyedtheplayfulwaythat themoving
my inclusionoftheideaofmovementwithinmy work,specifically movement withinthe
frame.
By including
motion as an elementitcreated more excitementanddynamicsbetweentheseriesofphotographs.
Figure 13
After my firstyearatRochester InstituteofTechnology,I movedtoNew York
City
forthesummerandinternedwithrenowneddocumentary
/portrait photographerMary
Ellen Mark. Oneofthemostinfluential womanphotographers of alltime, Markhascreated some ofAmerica'smost well known imagery. OnthedayswhenI was not
assistingor
interning
I shotlikea"madthing"tryingtocapturesomething ofthe
relationshipsthrough thegesturesI observedof
daily
life expandingupon whatI hadlearned
during
my firstyear. Thepart of relationships Iwas mostinterested incapturingwasthevisible aspect of people'severyday interactions. More specifically I was
interested inwhat we are abletocasuallyobserve,atiltofthehead, ahandonthe
shoulder,crossinganduncrossinglegs in everyday life. I feltthatalltheselittlegestures
relationshipsthattheyfindthemselvesin. Figure 13illustratesmyinterestin capturing
theimportanceof
body
languagewithin a relationship. When IwasphotographingIalsobecameinterested intheideaof personal space;orthedistances betweenpeople asthey
movethroughtheworld. Howpeople needthisdistance inordertofeel secure,andfeel
threatenedwhenitischallenged.
Figure 14
When Icame backtoRochesterfor mysecondyearintheMasterofFine Arts
Program,I preparedfora showI hadatthePierce Art
Gallery
in West Virginia. Thisconsistedofmy Walk Throughphotographs andsome workI haddone in Africa. I was
veryexcited aboutthisshow becauseitgaveme theopportunitytoshow workfromthe
second andthird Walk Throughtogetherforthefirst time. Figure 14isaninstillation
photographfrom myshowatPierce Art Gallery. Afterthat show, Idevelopedand
printedthephotographsthatI hadmade
during
the summerandhadashowin theAlumniGallery atRochester Instituteof
Technology
entitledFragmented Evidenceswhich was aLooking
backatthisbody
ofworkit isclearthatIwas"trying
on"differentstyles,
exploringthelimitsoftraditional blackand white photography. Becauseof all the
informationI wasabsorbin