• No results found

Comprehensive Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Specific CD4 Responses Reveals Marked Immunodominance of gag and nef and the Presence of Broadly Recognized Peptides


Academic year: 2019

Share "Comprehensive Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Specific CD4 Responses Reveals Marked Immunodominance of gag and nef and the Presence of Broadly Recognized Peptides"


Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text


Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comprehensive Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type

1-Specific CD4 Responses Reveals Marked Immunodominance of




and the Presence of Broadly Recognized Peptides

Daniel E. Kaufmann,


Paul M. Bailey,


John Sidney,


Bradford Wagner,


Philip J. Norris,


Mary N. Johnston,


Lisa A. Cosimi,


Marylyn M. Addo,


Mathias Lichterfeld,


Marcus Altfeld,


Nicole Frahm,


Christian Brander,


Alessandro Sette,


Bruce D. Walker,


and Eric S. Rosenberg



Partners AIDS Research Center and Infectious Disease Unit1and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts

General Hospital, and Division of AIDS, Harvard Medical School,4Boston, Massachusetts 02114; Brigham and

Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 021153; and Division of Vaccine

Discovery, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California 921212

Received 11 August 2003/Accepted 5 January 2004

Increasing evidence suggests that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific CD4 T-cell re-sponses contribute to effective immune control of HIV-1 infection. However, the breadths and specificities of these responses have not been defined. We screened fresh CD8-depleted peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 36 subjects at different stages of HIV-1 infection for virus-specific CD4 responses by gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunospot assay, using 410 overlapping peptides spanning all HIV-1 proteins (based on the clade B consensus sequence). HIV-1-specific CD4 responses were identified in 30 of the 36 individuals studied, with the strongest and broadest responses detected in persons treated in acute infection who underwent treatment interruption. In individuals with identified responses, the total number of recognized HIV-1 peptides ranged from 1 to 36 (median, 7) and the total magnitude of responses ranged from 80 to

>14,600 (median, 990) spot-forming cells/106 CD8-depleted PBMC. Neither the total magnitude nor the

number of responses correlated with viremia. The most frequent and robust responses were directed against

epitopes within the Gag and Nef proteins. Peptides targeted by >25% of individuals were then tested for

binding to a panel of common HLA-DR molecules. All bound broadly to at least four of the eight alleles tested, and two bound to all of the HLA-DR molecules studied. Fine mapping and HLA restriction of the responses against four of these peptides showed a combination of clustering of epitopes and promiscuous presentation of the same epitopes by different HLA class II alleles. These findings have implications for the design of immunotherapeutic strategies and for testing candidate HIV vaccines.

Increasing evidence indicates that cellular immune re-sponses play a major role in containing human immunodefi-ciency virus type 1 (HIV-1) replication (41). In the acute phase of HIV infection, the development of strong virus-specific CD8 T-cell responses correlates with the initial decline of viremia after its peak (3, 11, 33, 69) and precedes the production of any neutralizing antibody. In a monkey model of simian immuno-deficiency virus infection, early control of the virus fails if CD8 T cells are experimentally depleted prior to infection (56). If CD8 T cells are depleted during the chronic phase of infection, the virus level rises until CD8 T cells are restored (30). Addi-tional arguments for a determinant role of cytotoxic-T-lympho-cyte (CTL) responses are the association of slow progression to AIDS with defined HLA class I alleles (43), the association of loss of viremia control with viral immune escape from domi-nant CTL responses in the simian immunodeficiency virus model (4), and the report of a sudden increase of viremia after HIV-1 superinfection associated with declining CTL responses directed against the first virus (2).

However, the generation of strong HIV-specific CTLs in infected individuals (64) fails to completely control the infec-tion in the majority of persons. One defect in the immune response against HIV-1 is an impairment of CD4 T-cell pro-liferation to HIV antigens (7, 34, 37, 42, 49, 54, 55, 63, 67). Animal models indicate that virus-specific CD4 T cells are critical for the maintenance of effective immune control, and this is in part due to effects on CTL function (5, 29, 31, 40, 57, 60, 62, 70). CD4 help is also necessary for efficient neutralizing-antibody-mediated viral clearance (52). CD4 T-cell responses are also important in chronic human viral infections. For ex-ample, loss of virus-specific CD4 cells in human hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection leads to persistent viremia and progres-sive liver dysfunction, and broadly directed CD4 responses are associated with resolution of viremia (16). Recently, the im-portance of CD4 T cells for effective immune control of a virus causing chronic disease in humans has been shown for HCV infection of chimpanzees (24). Depletion of CD4 T cells before reinfection of two immune apes resulted in persistent, low-level viremia despite functional intrahepatic memory CD8⫹

-T-cell responses. Incomplete control of HCV replication by memory CD8⫹T cells in the absence of adequate CD4 T-cell

help was associated with the emergence of viral escape

muta-* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infectious Disease Divi-sion, Massachusetts General Hospital, Gray J-504, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114. Phone: (617) 724-7519. Fax: (617) 726-3795. E-mail: erosenberg1@partners.org.


on November 8, 2019 by guest



tions in class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-re-stricted epitopes and failure to resolve HCV infection.

In HIV infection, CD4 T helper cell responses may also be critical for long-term antiviral control. HIV-specific CD4 T-cell responses are thought to be impaired early in the course of the disease, and preferential infection of these cells by HIV con-tributes to their depletion (18). Numerous studies of HIV-1-specific CD4 T-cell responses have demonstrated the ability of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to proliferate in response to stimulation with viral antigens (7, 34, 37, 42, 49, 54, 55, 63, 67). HIV-1-specific lymphocyte proliferative responses are usually weak or absent in untreated HIV-1-infected indi-viduals but are more frequent in long-term nonprogressors (LTNP) than in subjects with progressive disease (34, 37, 55, 63, 67). These responses may be enhanced in subjects who receive prolonged highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with suppressed viral replication (37, 42), especially when they are treated during acute HIV infection (54). In addition, these responses have also been detected in individu-als receiving therapeutic immunization (53). Effector gamma interferon (IFN-␥)-secreting HIV-1-specific CD4 T cells can be detected in freshly isolated PBMC by intracellular cytokine staining (45, 51, 67) or by IFN-␥enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays (48), even though lymphocyte proliferative responses may be absent (6, 42, 49, 67), and HIV-1-specific CD4 T cells are detectable in most HIV-1-infected individuals with normal or moderately decreased CD4 counts (6). How-ever, the frequency of HIV-specific IFN-␥-secreting cells is much lower than that of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD4 T cells in the same individuals (51) or in HIV-seronegative subjects (9). Although a comprehensive analysis of CD4 T-cell responses directed against the whole expressed HIV-1 genome has been done by flow cytometry with peptide pools (6), the breadth and specificity of the response at the single-peptide level has not been determined, and few regions containing virus-specific CD4 T-cell epitopes have been defined (10, 19, 39).

This study was designed to determine the breadths and spec-ificities of HIV-1-specific CD4 T-cell responses detected by IFN-␥ELISPOT and to identify immunodominant regions of the clade B protein sequences across the entire expressed HIV-1 genome. HIV-1-specific CD4 T-cell responses were then compared among subjects categorized by virus load and treatment status. The peptides targeted by a large proportion of the individuals studied were assessed for binding to various common HLA-DR alleles, and for a subset of these responses, the precise epitopes targeted were defined and the HLA class II-presenting allele was determined. Finally, HIV-1-specific CD4 T-cell responses were contrasted with CD8 T-cell re-sponses in a subset of individuals.


Study subjects.Thirty-six HIV-1-infected individuals at different stages of infection were recruited from the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and the Lemuel Shattuck Hospital in Boston. Documentation of HIV-1 infection at least 1 year prior to analysis was required. Eight HIV-1-negative subjects were also included as controls. All participants gave informed consent prior to entry into the study. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The subjects were stable with regard to antiviral treatment, having been either on or off therapy for at least 3 months at the time of analysis. Most of the subjects in this study were at an early stage of HIV-1 infection (median CD4 T-cell count, 732;

range, 28 to 1,801 cells/mm3). The virus load measured by reverse

transcription-PCR (Amplicor; Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, Calif.) was below the limit of detection (50 RNA copies/ml) in all treated subjects; the median virus

load was 2,913 RNA copies/ml in untreated persons (range,⬍50 to 257,000 RNA


The study included 36 subjects in different disease stages. Individuals were divided into five groups according to their immunological and virological status and treatment history: individuals treated during acute HIV-1 infection and on continuous therapy since diagnosis (acute-Rx; seven subjects), subjects treated during acute HIV-1 infection who subsequently discontinued treatment in the context of a supervised treatment interruption (STI) trial (acute-STI; nine jects), individuals treated during chronic HIV-1 infection (chronic-Rx; five jects), untreated persons with chronic HIV-1 infection (chronic-no Rx; six

sub-jects), and individuals with low viremia (⬍2,000) and high CD4 counts (⬎500

cells/mm3) in the absence of antiviral treatment (controllers–LTNP; nine


HLA typing.DNA for typing was extracted using the Puregene DNA isolation kit for blood (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.) according to the manufac-turer’s instructions. HLA class II typing was performed at the MGH Tissue Typing Laboratory using sequence-specific primer PCR, as previously described (14). High-resolution HLA class II typing was performed by Dynal Biotech HLA Diagnostics (Bromborough, United Kingdom) using sequence-specific primer PCR (14).

Isolation of PBMC and CD8 depletion.Fresh blood was processed within 4 h of phlebotomy. PBMC were isolated on a Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), and CD8 depletion (for studies of CD4 T-cell responses) or CD4 depletion (for studies of CD8 T-cell responses) was performed at the time of PBMC isolation with the RosetteSep depletion reagents (StemCell Tech-nologies, Vancouver, Canada). Flow cytometry was performed as described pre-viously (28) to ensure the purity of cell populations after CD8 T-cell depletion.

Contamination by CD8 T cells was always⬍1% in 34 assessed samples (median,

0.02% residual CD8 T cells; range, 0.005 to 0.7%). In a subgroup of four subjects, CD4 depletion was performed for assessment of CD8 T-cell responses. These subjects were selected based solely on the availability of samples to perform these assays.

Synthetic HIV-1 peptides.A set of 410 peptides (15- to 20-mers overlapping by 10 amino acids) spanning the entire expressed HIV-1 genome was synthesized at the MGH Peptide Core Facility on an automated peptide synthesizer (Advanced Chemtech, Louisville, Ky.). These peptides were based on the HIV clade B consensus sequence 2001, available from the Los Alamos National Laboratory HIV immunology database (http://hiv-web.lanl.gov/content/hiv-db/CONSENSUS/M _GROUP/Consensus.html).

ELISPOT assays. Screening for CD4 T-cell responses was performed by

IFN-␥ELISPOT using a strategy based on a matrix of peptide pools as

previ-ously described (1). The 410 peptides spanning HIV-1 were divided into 72 pools of 10 to 12 peptides each. Each peptide was included in two different pools. The pattern of responses to the pools indicated specific candidate peptides, which were then individually retested. For analysis of CD4 T-cell responses, fresh CD8-depleted PBMC were plated in 96-well polyvinylidene plates (Millipore,

Bedford, Mass.) that had been precoated with the anti-IFN-␥antibody M700A

(Endogen, Woburn, Mass.) at a concentration of 0.5␮g/ml in

phosphate-buff-ered saline. Cells were added at a concentration of 60,000 to 100,000 per well in

200␮l of RPMI medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% human AB serum, 10

mM HEPES buffer, 2 mML-glutamine, and 50 U of penicillin-streptomycin (all

from Mediatech, Herndon, Va.). The final concentration of each peptide was 10

␮g/ml. Negative control wells (cells and medium only) were run in quadruplicate

on each plate, along with positive control wells (phytohemagglutinin at 1␮g/ml)

to ensure that the cells were responsive. The plate contents were incubated for

20 h at 37°C and 5% CO2and then washed six times with phosphate-buffered

saline, after which they were incubated at room temperature for 90 min with the corresponding biotinylated secondary antibody, M701B (Endogen), followed by washes and a 45-min incubation with a streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conju-gate (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). After the plates were washed, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate and nitroblue tetrazolium substrates (Bio-Rad) were added. The matrix was analyzed, and candidate peptides were tested individually either with cells kept in an incubator overnight (30 of the 36 study subjects) or with freshly isolated PBMC from a second blood draw performed 1 week to 1 month (median, 2 weeks) after the first visit (6 of the 36 subjects). The number of spots per well was determined using an automated ELISPOT plate reader (AID EliSpot reader system; Autoimmun Diagnostika GmbH, Strasburg, Ger-many). The results were expressed as spot-forming cells (SFC) per million CD8-depleted PBMC after the subtraction of the background. Analysis of samples was

performed only if the background was ⬍30 SFC per million input cells. A

on November 8, 2019 by guest



response was considered positive if⬎50 SFC/106CD8-depleted PBMC were

detected and they were at least 3 standard deviations above background. In order to compare the breadths of CD4 responses to those observed in CD8 cells, a comprehensive analysis of CD8 responses was performed in a subgroup of four individuals with a similar strategy using CD4-depleted PBMC.

CD4 T-cell lines.CD8-depleted PBMC were stimulated with the peptide of

interest at 10␮g/ml in R10 HAB medium supplemented with recombinant

interleukin-2 (IL-2) (50 U/ml) at a concentration of 2 million cells/ml on 24-well

plates. Indinavir (Merck) was added at a concentration of 0.4␮M, and

zidovu-dine (GlaxoSmithKline) was added at a concentration of 0.5␮M. The plate

contents were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2and fed two or three times weekly

with medium exchanges. After 10 to 12 days, the cells were assessed for

speci-ficity by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) for IFN-␥. If the specificity was

ⱖ5%, the cells were used directly in fine-mapping and restriction experiments. If

the specificity was⬍5%, peptide-specific cells were selected by an IFN-␥capture

assay (Miltenyi Biotech, Auburn, Calif.), as previously described (13). Briefly, the

cells were stimulated with 10␮g of peptide/ml and costimulatory CD28 and

CD49d monoclonal antibodies (1␮g/ml; BD Biosciences, San Jose, Calif.). After

incubation for 5 h, IFN-␥was processed according to the manufacturer’s

proto-col and isolated on a magnetic cell sorting proto-column. Selected cells were expanded with IL-2 and irradiated allogeneic feeder cells for an additional 10 to 14 days and then used in fine-mapping and restriction experiments, as described above.

ICS for IFN-and flow cytometry.ICS for IFN-␥was performed as previously

described (51). For fine mapping of epitopes, 3⫻105to 5105expanded

PBMC were incubated with autologous B cells at a ratio of 5 to 1 and incubated

with 2␮g of serial truncations (one or two amino acids) of the corresponding

peptide/ml with anti-CD28 and anti-CD49 antibodies (Becton Dickinson) at


37°C and 5% CO2for 1 h before the addition of brefeldin A (10␮g/ml; Becton

TABLE 1. Subject characteristics at time of analysis

Subjecta Age

(yr) Duration of HIVinfection (yr)b Current therapyc (copies/ml)Virus load

CD4 count


Total HIV-specific CD4 response


No. of recognized



AC20 4 4 HAART ⬍50 1,223 195 1

AC21 40 4 HAART ⬍50 489 1,105 7

AC32 38 3 HAART ⬍50 571 310 2

AC34 34 3 HAART ⬍50 443 205 0

AC63 38 2 HAART ⬍50 732 140 0

AC82 44 1 HAART ⬍50 1,082 270 3

AC87 39 4 HAART ⬍50 917 815 11


AC02 48 5 STI-no HAART 5,790 714 560 3

AC03 36 5 STI-no HAART 2,850 805 1,610 7

AC05 44 5 STI-no HAART 12,900 361 890 24

AC06 42 5 STI-no HAART 23,000 427 2,750 18

AC10 36 5 STI-no HAART 267 755 2,030 19

AC14 50 4 STI-no HAART 2,300 503 1,875 18

AC15 46 5 STI-no HAART 17,800 535 3,120 29

AC26 49 4 STI-no HAART 82,600 660 1,480 12

AC46 52 2 STI-no HAART 2,975 888 ⬎14,610 36


CRT1 33 1 HAART ⬍50 172 80 1

CRT2 36 13 HAART ⬍50 579 120 0

CRT3 40 1 HAART ⬍50 609 580 2

CRT4 52 3 HAART ⬍50 146 60 0

CRT5 34 3 HAART ⬍50 1,163 180 1

Chronic-no Rx

CRU1 51 1 None 16,300 899 1,360 2

CRU2 55 1 None 32,800 1,050 1,540 9

CRU3 29 1 None 52,700 371 295 4

CRU4 34 2 None 23,500 1,051 230 3

CRU5 38 6 None 257,000 28 0 0

CRU6 38 2 None 10,791 239 1,365 8


CO1 34 3 None 212 1,082 1,320 9

CO2 44 4 None 1,620 798 130 0

CO5 37 6 None ⬍50 732 250 3

CO6 50 7 None 1,140 672 745 3

CO7 54 4 None 390 742 230 6

LT4 50 10 None ⬍50 832 4,540 34

LT6 37 15 None 754 832 1,175 22

LT9 40 14 None ⬍50 1,801 640 7

LT14 48 7 None ⬍50 1,340 880 6

aSubjects AC20, CRT3, CRU5, CRU6, and LT14 are females. All other individuals are males.

bIndicates years of documented HIV-1 infection.

cHAART defined as regimen containing at least three drugs.

dSum of responses to the positive peptide pools in IFN-ELISPOT in SFC per 106CD8-depleted PBMC. As each peptide is in two pools, only the responses to

the pools with contiguous overlapping peptides were used for the calculation of the total response.

eNumber of confirmed responses to individual peptides in IFN-ELISPOT.

on November 8, 2019 by guest



Dickinson). The cells were incubated for an additional 5 h at 37°C and 5% CO2

and then washed and stained with anti-CD4–phycoerythrin antibody and 7-AAD (Becton Dickinson) at 4°C for 20 min. The cells were fixed with solution A (Caltag), permeated with solution B (Caltag), and then stained with fluorescein

isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-IFN-␥ and allophycocyanin-conjugated CD69

(Becton Dickinson).

For analysis of HLA class II restriction, autologous and partially HLA-matched Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B-lymphoblastoid cell lines (BCL) and L cell lines (LCL) stably transfected with HLA class II molecules were pulsed

with 1␮g of peptide/ml for 90 min at 37°C and 5% CO2. HLA-DR-transfected

cell lines were a kind gift of Epimmune (Foster City, Calif.). The peptide-pulsed BCL or LCL were then washed three times, incubated with the same numbers of peptide-specific cells, and stained as described above.

Six-parameter flow cytometric analysis was performed on a two-laser

FACS-Calibur instrument (Becton Dickinson). At least 5,000, and usually⬎10,000,

events were collected in the live (7AADlow) CD4⫹lymphocyte gate. Data were

analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, San Carlos, Calif.).

HLA-DR binding studies.Frequently targeted peptides were tested for bind-ing in vitro to eight common HLA-DR molecules. DR molecules were purified, and binding assays were performed essentially as previously described (66). Purified human HLA-DR molecules were incubated with unlabeled HIV-1

pep-tides and 1 to 10 nM125I-radiolabeled probe peptides for 48 h. MHC binding of

the radiolabeled peptide was determined by capturing MHC-peptide complexes on LB3.1 (anti-HLA-DRA) antibody-coated Lumitrac 600 plates (Greiner Bio-one, Frickenhausen, Germany) and measuring bound counts per minute using the TopCount (Packard Instrument Co., Meriden, Conn.) microscintillation counter. The binding data were analyzed, and 50% inhibitory concentrations

(IC50s) (nanomolar) were derived, as previously described (59, 66).

Statistical analysis.Statistical analysis and graphical presentation were per-formed using GraphPad Prism version 3.0 software. Nonparametric statistical tests were used to avoid the assumption of normally distributed data sets, and the results are given as medians with ranges. Statistical analysis of the difference between two groups for a given variable was done with the two-tailed

Mann-Whitney test. Values forPof⬍0.05 were considered significant.


Magnitude of HIV-specific CD4 T-cell responses shows

dominance of Gag and Nef. In order to assess the relative

contributions of CD4 T-cell responses to different viral pro-teins, we first investigated the ability of peptide pools repre-senting expressed gene products to induce IFN-␥production in CD8-depleted PBMC. There was a wide range in the magni-tudes of responses observed, and responses to Gag and Nef

pools were immunodominant (Fig. 1). Peptides contained within p17, p24, and p15 were frequently targeted, as were multiple regions of Nef. The only other peptide pool recog-nized by ⬎25% of individuals was located in integrase. In persons with positive responses, the total magnitudes of re-sponses against the entire expressed genome ranged from 80 to ⬎14,600 SFC/106 CD8-depleted cells (median, 990 SFC/106 CD8-depleted cells) (Table 1). These data using peptide pools indicate that multiple regions of Gag and Nef are targeted by HIV-specific CD4 T cells and that other regions of the virus are only infrequently targeted, if at all.

The highest HIV-1-specific CD4 T-cell epitope density is in Gag and Nef, with limited epitopes identified within other

proteins.In order to characterize the responses at the

single-peptide level, IFN-␥ELISPOT assays were performed using mixtures of 9 to 12 peptides in a matrix format in which each peptide was present in two wells. The pattern of positive wells allowed the prediction of individual positive peptides, which were then retested and confirmed at the single-peptide level. Overall, 30 (83%) subjects recognized at least one peptide, and in persons with detectable responses, there was a broad range in the number of responses to individual peptides targeted, from 1 to 36 (median, 7 per individual). The dominant targets in terms of breadth of responses were Gag and Nef (Fig. 2). Only 112 of the 410 peptides (27%) were recognized by CD4 T cells in this study, and of these 112 peptides, 52 were in Gag and 16 were in Nef. The percentages of peptides targeted within the individual proteins were highly variable (Table 2), with 88% of p15-Gag peptides recognized by at least one subject and no recognition of Vif and Vpu peptides. Recogni-tion of⬎50% of overlapping peptides was observed only for the proteins Gag-p17, Gag-p24, Gag-p15, and Nef. These four proteins accounted for 82% (271 out of 329) of the total num-ber of responses identified and for 61% of all positive peptides. In order to confirm the specificity of the responses, contem-poraneous assays were performed in a group of eight HIV-1-seronegative controls using CD8-depleted PBMC. At the time

FIG. 1. Magnitudes of responses to peptide pools spanning the entire expressed HIV-1 genome. The horizontal axis represents the 36 peptide pools and the corresponding HIV proteins, and the vertical axis represents the magnitudes of responses expressed as the number of IFN-␥ -producing cells/106depleted PBMC in IFN-ELISPOT.

on November 8, 2019 by guest



of testing, investigators were blinded to the HIV serostatus of four of the eight control subjects. No response against any of the 410 peptides could be confirmed in this cohort, indicating that the responses were virus specific.

Taken together, these data indicate that HIV-1 Gag and Nef are frequent targets of HIV-specific CD4 cells and that not only is the magnitude of responses to these proteins the stron-gest, they also contain the highest epitope density.

Eight peptides were targeted by at least 25% of individuals (Table 3). These were located in p17-Gag (ASRELERFA VNPGLL, ERFAVNPGLLETSEGCR, and SLYNTVATLYC VHQRIEV), p24-Gag (WIILGLNKIVRMYSPTSI and YVD RFYKTLRAEQASQEV), p15-Gag (RQANFLGKIWPSHK GR), and Nef (PEKEVLVWKFDSRLAFHH and KFDSRLA FHHMARELH). Ninety-three percent of the subjects who had HIV-specific CD4 T-cell responses recognized at least one peptide within this small subset of eight. The most frequently

targeted peptide, p24-Gag (YVDRFYKTLRAEQASQEV), was recognized by 58% of the individuals studied.

The high frequency of recognition of some peptides corre-sponds to a combination of overlapping but distinct epitopes and promiscuous epitopes presented by different HLA-DR

al-leles. In order to further characterize the fine specificity of

responses directed against this subset of frequently recognized peptides, we analyzed IFN-␥responses to serial truncations of the peptides. The truncations differed in length by two amino acids for the initial location of the epitope and then by one amino acid for finer mapping. The effects of both serial trun-cations and variations in peptide concentration on magnitude of the IFN-␥responses are illustrated in Fig. 3. It shows two examples for which different truncations of the same peptide,

p24133-150, were tested at 10-fold dose intervals ranging from

20 ␮g/ml to 2 pg/ml. The results demonstrate that a higher concentration of each truncation results in a reproducible in-crease in the magnitude of the response. Optimal responses were obtained with the full 18-amino-acid peptide and did not significantly differ from results obtained with the 14-mer trun-cation, p24133-146. Additional shortening of the peptide re-sulted in incremental decrease of the response, and therefore, a clear-cut minimal epitope was difficult to define. For all our fine-mapping analyses, we defined the “core epitope” as the smallest peptide triggering a response at least 50% of that observed with the full-length peptide at a concentration of 2 ␮g/ml. This definition is consistent with criteria that have been used in a study of CMV-specific CD4 T-cell responses (8). In the case of the peptide p24133-150-specific CD4 cell line in subject LT04, these criteria defined the 11-mer ILG LNKIVRMY as the core epitope. However, smaller responses were still detected for a 10-mer and a 9-mer.


The generation of CD4 T-cell lines also provided a means of assessing the HLA restriction of these peptide-specific CD4 cells. Cells from the cell line of interest were stimulated with peptide-pulsed autologous B cells, partially HLA-matched

FIG. 2. Individual peptide recognition by CD4 cells across the entire expressed HIV-1 genome. The horizontal axis represents the 410 overlapping peptides and the corresponding HIV proteins, and the vertical axis represents the percentages of study subjects with a response to each individual peptide.

TABLE 2. Numbers and percentages of peptides recognized within individual HIV-1 proteins

Protein No. of overlappingpeptides


% Of overlapping peptides recognized

p17 (Gag) 14/17 82

p24 (Gag) 23/32 72

p15 (Gag) 15/17 88

Protease (Pol) 2/20 10

Reverse transcriptase (Pol) 10/76 13

Integrase (Pol) 9/37 24

Vif 0/24 0

Vpr 5/11 45

Vpu 0/10 0

Tat 3/12 25

Rev 4/15 27

gp120 (Env) 6/67 9

gp41 (Env) 5/46 11

Nef 16/27 59

on November 8, 2019 by guest



BCL, and if available for the specific HLA-DR alleles, with the corresponding HLA-DR-transfected LCL. IFN-␥production was assessed by ICS. Representative data demonstrating HLA class II restriction of this same peptide p24133-150-specific cell line in subject LT04 are shown in Fig. 4. Peptide-pulsed DRB1*0801-matched BCL were unable to stimulate IFN-␥ production by the cell line, whereas DRB1*1301-matched BCL induced IFN-␥production comparable to that of autologous

peptide-pulsed BCL. Furthermore, the DRB1*1301- trans-fected LCL was able to efficiently present the peptide. These results indicate that p24133-150is DRB1*1301 restricted in this subject.

These methods were used to characterize the fine specificity of responses against the frequently recognized peptides

p1737-51, p1742-58, p24133-150, and p24164-181 and to examine

their HLA restriction in selected individuals. These data are summarized in Fig. 5 and show that the core epitopes accord-ing to the criteria defined above are 9 to 12 amino acids long. The two overlapping peptides p1737-51 and p1742-58 were frequently recognized simultaneously in our cohort. Nine of the 13 subjects targeting peptide p1737-51also targeted peptide

p1742-58, and 9 of the 10 subjects targeting peptide p1742-58also


targeted peptide p1737-51, suggesting that a common epitope may be located in the overlap. Fine-mapping experiments con-firmed that in subject AC87, the cell lines specific for these two peptides targeted the same core epitope, ERFAVNPGLL, lo-cated in the overlap and presented by DRB3*0202. However, in subject AC05, the p1737-51-specific cell line targeted a dif-ferent epitope, RELERFAVN, presented by DRB1*1302, whereas the p1742-58-specific cell line also targeted ERFA VNPGLL and was restricted by another DRB3 allele, DRB3*0301. As this core epitope is located in the overlap of the two peptides used to grow the cell lines, these data also suggest that a peptide longer than the core epitope may be

FIG. 3. Dose-response analysis of truncations of peptide p24133-150.

Cell lines of subject LT04 specific for peptide p24133-150were

stimu-lated with serial dilutions of different truncations of the full-length peptide. The dotted line labeled A corresponds to the response to the full-length peptide at 2␮g/ml, and the dotted line B corresponds to 50% of this response. The minimal peptide triggering a response cor-responding toⱖ50% of the response to the full-length peptide at 2


␮g/ml was defined as the core epitope in the fine-mapping experi-ments.

TABLE 3. Most frequently recognized peptides

% Of subjectsa Protein Amino acid

positions Sequence % Of subjectswith response

ⱖ25 p17 37–51 ASRELERFAVNPGLL 36








⬎10–⬍25 p17 1–18 MGARASVLSGGELDRWEK 14























aPercentage of studied individuals in whom peptide was recognized.

on November 8, 2019 by guest



FIG. 4. Peptide p24133-150-specific CD T cells are restricted by HLA DRB1*1301 in subject LT04. Peptide-pulsed autologous and partially

HLA-matched B cells, as well as HLA DR-transfected L cells, were incubated with the p24133-150-specific cell line from subject LT04 for 6 h; stained

for CD4, 7AAD, CD69, and IFN-␥; and analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentage of CD4⫹7AADlowCD69⫹IFN-␥⫹cells is indicated in the

upper right quadrant of each plot.

on November 8, 2019 by guest



necessary to efficiently trigger peptide-specific CD4 T-cell pro-liferation.

Peptide p24133-150contains a DRB1*1301-restricted epitope that partially overlaps with a distinct epitope presented by at least two different DR alleles. The dose-response curves for the serial truncations of the two DRB1*1301-restricted re-sponses differed slightly, resulting in the definition of core epitopes differing by one amino acid.

Similarly, the most frequently recognized peptide in our study, peptide p24164-181, contains at least two distinct, partially overlapping epitopes. The 12-mer RFYKTLRAEQAS was shown to be presented by at least three different HLA-DR alleles, although the core epitope was demonstrated to be shorter by one amino acid in subject AC04 and two amino acids in subject AC87. These data also show that the same DRB1*1301 can present two distinct overlapping epitopes in the same peptide.

Taken together, these results demonstrate that the presence of both overlapping but distinct epitopes and promiscuous epitopes presented by different HLA-DR molecules contrib-utes to the high frequency of recognition of some HIV-1 pep-tides.

The most frequently recognized peptides bind broadly to

multiple HLA-DR molecules. We next assessed whether the

eight peptides that were shown to be targeted byⱖ25% of the studied individuals showed cross-reactive HLA-DR binding capacity (Table 4). Some of the core epitopes shown in Fig. 5 were also investigated in these experiments. Assays of binding

FIG. 5. Fine mapping and restriction of epitopes located in pep-tides p1737-51, p1742-58, p24133-150, and p24164-181. Peptide-specific CD4

cells lines were used to determine the core epitope and the restricting HLA allele of these frequently recognized peptides. For the two epitopes NKIVRMYSPTSI located in peptide p24133-150, the

signifi-cance of the N-terminal asparagine and C-terminal isoleucine (shaded) was not determined, because the required truncations were not avail-able at the time of the assays. We could not differentiate presentation by DRB1*1501 or DRB5*0101. Because of the linkage disequilibrium existing between these two DR molecules, no BCL expressing only one of the two molecules was available. LCL transfected with DR1*1501 and DRB5*0101 were not available at the time that the experiments were performed. TABLE 4. Peptide-binding capacities of common HLA-DR molecules Protein

Amino acid positions






molecules bound (out

of 8) DRB1*0101 DRB1*0401 DRB1*0405 DRB1*0701 DRB1*1101 DRB1*1302 DRB1*1501 DRB5*0101 p17 37 –51 ASRELERFAVNPGLL 285.39 90 431 116 1,834 10 56 3,673 6 p17 41 –51 LERFAVNPGLL 3,185 19,263 23,880 1,407 7,115 59 6,822 25,832 1 p17 42 –58 ERFAVNPGLLETSEGCR 96 1,222 113 3,095 463 16 16,298 7,393 4 p17 77 –94 SLYNTVATLYCVHQRIEV 279 61 110 78 3,841 92 1,701 781 6 p24 133 –150 WIILGLNKIVRMYSPTSI 0.62 1.4 3.3 108 19 1.8 0.31 102 8 p24 133 –144 WIILGLNKIVRM 12 5,353 8,920 13,634 107 0.71 17 171 5 p24 135 –145 ILGLNKIVRMY 3,292 653 1,233 5,536 2,074 5.4 6.5 1,615 3 p24 139 –150 NKIVRMYSPTSI 0.48 4.4 6.6 482 46 156 0.84 760 8 p24 164 –181 YVDRFYKTLRAEQASQEV 6.0 15 35 231 101 97 176 32 8 p24 167 –178 RFYKTLRAEQAS 3.8 700 770 900 790 ⬎ 50,000 217 803 7 p24 168 –180 FYKTLRAEQASQE 0.37 13 89 1,887 65 42,686 651 88 6 p24 168 –179 FYKTLRAEQASQ 0.42 36 3,429 3,944 24 ⬎ 50,000 1,352 76 4 p24 169 –177 YKTLRAEQA 71 33,147 ⬎ 50,000 30,666 26,791 ⬎ 50,000 ⬎ 50,000 24,712 1 p15 66 –81 RQANFLGKIWPSHKGR 758 446 732 7,187 629 454 1.3 48 7 Nef 176 –193 PEKEVLVWKFDSRLAFHH 3.4 738 1,050 97 144 512 0.080 177 7 Nef 184 –199 KFDSRLAFHHMARELH 269 3,087 3,864 70 47 28,600 124 102 5 aAn IC50 of ⱕ 1,000 is considered signi ficant (underlined). Boldface indicates peptides tested in comprehensive screening experiments and recognized by at least 25% of individuals.

on November 8, 2019 by guest



to eight frequent HLA-DR molecules were performed. All eight peptides bound to at least four of the eight HLA-DR alleles tested, and two peptides (the most frequently recog-nized, p24164-181 and p24133-150) bound to all eight tested HLA-DR molecules. The core epitopes RFYKTLAEQAS and NKIVRMYSPTSI bound to seven and eight of the eight HLA-DR molecules tested, respectively. Interestingly, testing of truncations of peptide p24164-181showed that differences of one amino acid can result in marked differences in binding to some HLA-DR molecules, whereas binding to others is unaf-fected.

Strongest HIV-specific CD4 T-cell responses are seen in individuals who discontinued therapy after treatment of

pri-mary infection.We next investigated the relationship between

the magnitude of HIV-specific CD4 responses, the number of peptides recognized, the virus load, and the treatment status (Fig. 6). Among the subjects treated during acute infection, the magnitudes of responses were significantly higher in individu-als who were off therapy after one to three treatment inter-ruption cycles (acute-STI) than in those individuals continu-ously on therapy (acute-Rx) (medians, 1,890 [range, 560 to 14,600] and 270 [range, 140 to 1,105] SFC/106CD8-depleted PBMC, respectively; P ⫽ 0.0007). Similarly, the number of responses was significantly higher in individuals in the acute-STI group than in the subjects in the acute-Rx group (medians, 18 [range 3 to 36] and 2 [range, 0 to 11], respectively; P

0.002). These differences remained significant when a Bonfer-roni correction was applied for the three comparisons made. The median time off therapy for the subjects who had discon-tinued treatment was 497 days (range, 110 to 1,126 days). In chronic HIV-1 infection, there was a trend toward increased numbers of responses in untreated subjects compared to con-tinuously treated individuals (P⫽0.05), although the numbers studied were small. Some individuals with nonprogressive in-fections had broad and strong responses; the number of re-sponses detected by IFN-␥production in this group was vari-able and not statistically different from that in untreated subjects with chronic viremia (⬎10,000 RNA copies/ml). In spite of the differences existing among the groups, our results did not show a direct correlation between the virus load on one hand and the magnitude or breadth of responses on the other hand when the whole cohort of 36 subjects was considered. Based on a linear-regression model, no correlation was found between the plasma virus load (in log10RNA copies/ml) and either the total magnitude of the HIV-specific IFN-␥response (P⫽0.33) or the number of individual peptides targeted (P⫽ 0.18). However, there was a highly significant correlation be-tween the magnitudes and breadths of responses (P⬍0.0001).

HIV-1-specific CD4 responses can be more narrowly

di-rected than CD8 responses in the same person. In order to

compare the HIV-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses in the same individuals, we performed a comprehensive analysis of CD8 T-cell responses in a subgroup of four individuals using CD4-depleted PBMC in the same matrix-based strategy and compared these data to CD4 T-cell responses. In all four individuals, we observed stronger CD8 responses in terms of the magnitude and number of peptides targeted, as well as a broader targeting by CD8 T cells with regard to the number of viral proteins recognized (Fig. 7), contrasting with the weaker and less numerous CD4 T-cell responses, which were more narrowly directed against only some of the HIV proteins. Therefore, many highly conserved peptides outside Gag and Nef proteins were not targeted by CD4 T cells, although they generated strong CD8 T-cell responses. Moreover, the immu-nogenic peptides were infrequently the same for CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses.



In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the breadths and specificities of HIV-1-specific CD4 T-cell re-sponses in order to determine the regions of the virus that are most immunogenic. In persons at various stages of infection, HIV-1-specific CD4 responses were identified in the majority of individuals, with consistent immunodominance of Gag and Nef proteins. We showed that the focused recognition of over-lapping but distinct epitopes and epitopes promiscuously pre-sented by different HLA class II molecules both contribute to the high frequency of responses to a limited subset of peptides that was observed. Moreover, these frequently recognized pep-tides broadly bound to different common HLA-DR alleles. Despite the extensive HLA diversity in the study population, there was a single peptide in Gag that was recognized by⬎50% of the subjects. This peptide lies in a well-conserved region of the C-terminal dimerization domain of p24 (capsid antigen), which is required for capsid dimerization (23, 68) and Gag

FIG. 6. Comparison of magnitudes and breadths of responses among the different study groups. (A) Total magnitude of HIV-specific CD4 T-cell responses per individual for the different groups described in Materials and Methods. (B) Numbers of confirmed CD4 T-cell responses per individual for the different groups. The median values are indicated by horizontal bars.Pvalues were calculated using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.

on November 8, 2019 by guest



on November 8, 2019 by guest



oligomerization (21). Interestingly, this peptide partially over-laps with the major homology region, a 20-amino-acid-long stretch essential for virus assembly, maturation, and infectivity that is conserved across all known oncoviruses and lentiviruses (22, 65; R. Patarca and W. A. Haseltine, Letter, Nature312:

496, 1984) and in the yeast retrotransposon Ty-3 (44). Ninety-three percent of the subjects with positive responses targeted at least one peptide within a small subset of eight. These results suggest that a limited number of peptides may induce CD4 T-cell immune responses in a genetically diverse population. The paucity of CD4 T-cell responses to other HIV-1 proteins, including well-conserved regions of the virus, contrasted with the pattern of CD8 T-cell responses in the same subjects in whom there was broad targeting of other proteins.

The immunodominance of Gag and Nef for CD8 T-cell responses has been well documented, but there have been limited data on the precise locations of highly targeted regions for CD4 T-cell responses. These results indicate that HIV-1-specific CD4 T-cell responses were predominantly located in p17, p24, and p15 and throughout Nef in all groups of individ-uals studied, irrespective of treatment or disease status. Spe-cific CD4 T cells were readily detectable in the majority of individuals, although with a low magnitude in most of them, in agreement with previously published results (6). Whereas the majority of the Gag and Nef peptides were recognized by one or more individuals, no response could be detected against some of the accessory proteins (Vpu and Vif), and large parts of the proteins encoded by the Pol and Env genes were also poorly targeted. This contrasts with the pattern of responses observed for CD8 T cells. Whereas Gag and Nef are often immunodominant proteins for CD8 T-cell responses (1, 20), other proteins are frequently targeted as well. We confirmed these different patterns of responses in a subgroup of four individuals for whom both CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses had been comprehensively studied. These data show that strong CD8 T-cell responses can be detected against proteins not targeted by CD4 T cells; however, the significance of this observation is unclear.

Such a preferential targeting of a limited number of viral proteins by CD4 T cells, although striking, does not appear to be unique to HIV-1. A marked hierarchy of immunodomi-nance has been described for CD4 T-cell responses to Epstein-Barr virus proteins (35). The mechanisms of such preferential targeting are not known. Sequence variation of the autologous viral sequence compared to the consensus sequence used for the synthetic peptides may contribute to the pattern of immu-nodominance observed. The conserved structure of Gag, for example, may contribute to the high frequency of responses observed against p24 peptides. However, very well conserved regions of the genome, particularly in Pol, were rarely targeted by CD4 T cells and were simultaneously well recognized by CD8 T cells. In contrast, the more variable Nef protein was frequently recognized. Taken together, these data suggest that mechanisms other than sequence variation contribute to the hierarchy of responses observed. Definitive proof would re-quire sequencing of the autologous virus and synthesis of tologous peptides to allow the assessment of responses to au-tologous virus.

The variable recognition of HIV-1 proteins by CD4 T cells might also be affected by a differential ability of HIV-1 proteins






















































































on November 8, 2019 by guest



to be processed and then presented through the exogenous pathway. In an animal model using mice immunized with HIV-1 Env, CD4 T-cell epitopes were clustered in slightly glycosylated, exposed nonhelical strands of the protein (61). Additionally, anti-Env antibodies can alter the uptake or pro-cessing of gp120 (26). However, data for subjects with acute HIV-1 infection showed that relatively broad and strong CD4 T-cell responses can occasionally be generated against proteins infrequently targeted in the chronic phase of HIV-1 infection, for example, against the components of Env, gp120, and gp41 (39, 47). These studies showed that these Env-specific re-sponses quickly wane over time, regardless of treatment status, and that Gag-specific responses predominate later on (39), in agreement with our study, which focused on subjects for whom HIV-1 diagnosis had been established at least 1 year prior to analysis. Therefore, the paucity of responses observed against at least some of the HIV-1 proteins may not be due to an intrinsic inability to be processed by the exogenous pathway and presented by HLA class II molecules. Of note, the re-ported disappearance of responses observed during acute HIV-1 infection can occur in the absence of immune escape mutations, and these HIV-1-specific CD4 T cells can persist at very low frequencies, undetectable by standard assays, like IFN-␥ELISPOTs or lymphocyte proliferation assays, but iden-tified by analysis of T-cell receptor transcripts (39).

The present study identified numerous peptides that were recognized in⬎10% of the studied individuals (Table 3). Some of them overlap or contain described CD4 T-cell epitopes, like p17-Gag37-51 (36), p24-Gag133-150 (10), and p24-Gag164-181 (38), but most have not been described as targets for CD4 responses. Moreover, the target epitopes for CD4 responses differ from those for CD8 responses. For example, in a large study using the same set of overlapping peptides, the eight peptides most frequently targeted by CD8 cells were clustered in the middle region of the Nef protein (amino acids 65 to 148) (20), whereas our results showed that CD4 T-cell responses more frequently targeted the C-terminal end of this protein

The number of responses to overlapping peptides may over-estimate the number of epitopic regions, because an epitope can be located in the overlap of two consecutive peptides. Positive responses to two adjacent overlapping peptides oc-curred for 30% of the responses, and responses to three adja-cent peptides occurred in 13% of the responses, which could correspond in some cases to one and two epitopic regions, respectively. Fine mapping of epitopes located in the two fre-quently recognized adjacent peptides p1737-51 and p1742-58 confirmed that the 10-amino-acid overlap of our peptide set can correspond to the core epitope triggering a positive sponse. However, we also demonstrated that simultaneous re-sponses to these two peptides in an individual can also corre-spond to two distinct epitopes. Although a frequent association of positive responses is suggestive of an epitope located in the overlap, it is difficult to make general conclusions.

Different factors likely contribute to the broad recognition of a limited subset of HIV peptides among individuals with various HLA types. Promiscuous presentation of peptides by several class II alleles has been reported in different settings (17, 58, 59). In order to investigate this possibility, studies of binding to a panel of eight common HLA-DR molecules were performed and showed that the eight most frequently

recog-nized peptides bound broadly to a minimum of four of the eight alleles tested, and two, including the most frequently targeted peptide, p24164-181, bound to all of the DR molecules tested. Of note, all peptides in this subset contain at least one sequence consistent with the previously described HLA-DR supermotif (59, 66). However, this characteristic is not unique to this subset of peptides, and several HIV-1 peptides harbor-ing this HLA-DR supermotif that have been shown to bind to many HLA-DR molecules (66) were rarely targeted in our study. This is particularly true for those peptides located in the reverse transcriptase.

Fine mapping and HLA restriction of the precise epitopes targeted showed that the presence of both overlapping but distinct epitopes and epitopes that were identical or that dif-fered by only one or two amino acids and were presented by different HLA-DR alleles contributed to the high frequency of recognition. Additional amino acids on one or both sides of these core epitopes lead to an increase in the IFN-␥response of the specific cell line, as recently described for CMV-specific CD4 T-cell responses (8). The data illustrate a previously noted dichotomy between class I and class II binding and T-cell recognition. Class I molecules bind peptides of an exact size, and therefore the minimal ligand is also optimal. By contrast, class II molecules bind peptides in multiple registers, where a core region engages the binding grove with additional flanking residues contributing a small part of the overall binding energy. Therefore, the core binding region is usually not the optimal ligand. Conversely, the optimal ligand is not the minimal ligand but rather corresponds to the core binding region plus a few flanking residues on either or both sides.

It was noted long ago that recognition of a given epitope in the context of multiple T cells is usually due to the same binding core, with the flanking regions being variably crucial for some T-cell receptors and not others. Similarly, it has been demonstrated (46, 50, 58) that recognition of promiscuous peptides in the context of different HLA class II molecules is due to the peptide binding MHC in the same register but with each interaction and T-cell recognition being variably influ-enced by the regions flanking the core. This has been demon-strated in the cases of influenza virus (HA 307 to 319), tetanus toxoid (TT 830 to 843), andPlasmodium falciparumCSP (378 to 398). The data shown here are consistent with this general mode of recognition.

Comparison of the magnitudes and breadths of responses among the different groups showed that the strongest and broadest responses were detected in subjects treated in acute infection who underwent treatment interruption and in indi-viduals who spontaneously controlled HIV replication without therapy. Some subjects in the latter group, however, had weak or undetectable HIV-specific CD4 T-cell responses in IFN-␥ ELISPOT assays, suggesting that spontaneous control of vire-mia does not always require strong HIV-specific IFN-␥ -secret-ing CD4 responses. Overall, there was no correlation between the virus load at the time of the study and either the magni-tudes or breadths of IFN-␥responses, in agreement with pre-viously published data (6). By contrast, recent studies suggest an inverse correlation between plasma viremia and the number of IL-2-secreting HIV-specific CD4 T cells (25, 27). One lim-itation of our measurements of the breadths of responses may be due to the sensitivity of our assays, and this may contribute

on November 8, 2019 by guest



to the correlation observed between the magnitudes and breadths of responses in the entire cohort. Most of the indi-viduals treated during acute HIV infection who subsequently stopped therapy in the context of an STI trial showed strong and broad responses in contrast to subjects continuously on therapy. Previous studies have shown an increase of HIV-specific IFN-␥-secreting CD4 T cells after treatment interrup-tion and rebound of viremia (15, 42). This increase, however, was short-lived in subjects treated during chronic HIV infec-tion, lasting⬍1 month, with responses going back to a low or undetectable level (15). This contrasts with our data for sub-jects treated during acute HIV infection, in whom strong re-sponses were detected at a median of⬎16 months after the last treatment interruption. However, the extent to which the mag-nitude or breadth of the responses contributes to maintenance of viremia control is unknown and will require further longi-tudinal studies. The importance of CD4 T-cell help for ade-quate generation of efficient, protective memory CD8 T-cell responses during priming has recently been shown, but an absence of CD4 help during rechallenge with antigen did not appear to impair the proliferative capacity of memory CD8 T cells in some models (12, 29, 57, 60). However, the loss of CD4 T cells during chronic viral infections can adversely affect the function of antigen-specific CTLs (40, 70), and other models suggest that memory CD8 T-cell differentiation continues for several weeks after the resolution of an acute viral infection (32). Likewise, whether the quality and quantity of the HIV-specific CTLs and B cells is modified by the prolonged persis-tence of these HIV-specific CD4 T-cell responses remains to be shown.

In conclusion, HIV-1-specific CD4 T-cell responses are markedly dominated by epitopes in Gag and Nef in established HIV-1 infection. Although the contributions of these re-sponses are unknown, identification of peptides frequently tar-geted across a diverse population with regard to HLA class II types may prove useful for the design of new immunotherapies and vaccines.


We thank all study participants for their invaluable help and Roche Molecular Systems for generous support in providing HIV-1 Amplicor virus load testing kits.

This study was supported by the Swiss Foundation for Grants in Biology and Medicine (SSMBS) (D.E.K.); NIH grants N01-Al-15422 (N.F. and C.B.), N01-AI-95362 (J.S. and A.S.), AI01698 (P.J.N.), and AI040873 (E.S.R.); and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (B.D.W., P.J.N., M.A., and E.S.R.).


1. Addo, M. M., X. G. Yu, A. Rathod, D. Cohen, R. L. Eldridge, D. Strick, M. N. Johnston, C. Corcoran, A. G. Wurcel, C. A. Fitzpatrick, M. E. Feeney, W. R. Rodriguez, N. Basgoz, R. Draenert, D. R. Stone, C. Brander, P. J. Goulder, E. S. Rosenberg, M. Altfeld, and B. D. Walker.2003. Comprehensive epitope analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific T-cell responses directed against the entire expressed HIV-1 genome demonstrate

broadly directed responses, but no correlation to viral load. J. Virol.77:2081–


2. Altfeld, M., T. M. Allen, X. G. Yu, M. N. Johnston, D. Agrawal, B. T. Korber, D. C. Montefiori, D. H. O’Connor, B. T. Davis, P. K. Lee, E. L. Maier, J. Harlow, P. J. Goulder, C. Brander, E. S. Rosenberg, and B. D. Walker.2002.

HIV-1 superinfection despite broad CD8⫹T-cell responses containing

rep-lication of the primary virus. Nature420:434–439.

3. Altfeld, M., E. S. Rosenberg, R. Shankarappa, J. S. Mukherjee, F. M. Hecht, R. L. Eldridge, M. M. Addo, S. H. Poon, M. N. Phillips, G. K. Robbins, P. E. Sax, S. Boswell, J. O. Kahn, C. Brander, P. J. Goulder, J. A. Levy, J. I.

Mullins, and B. D. Walker. 2001. Cellular immune responses and viral diversity in individuals treated during acute and early HIV-1 infection. J.

Exp. Med.193:169–180.

4. Barouch, D. H., J. Kunstman, M. J. Kuroda, J. E. Schmitz, S. Santra, F. W. Peyerl, G. R. Krivulka, K. Beaudry, M. A. Lifton, D. A. Gorgone, D. C. Montefiori, M. G. Lewis, S. M. Wolinsky, and N. L. Letvin.2002. Eventual AIDS vaccine failure in a rhesus monkey by viral escape from cytotoxic T

lymphocytes. Nature415:335–339.

5. Battegay, M., D. Moskophidis, A. Rahemtulla, H. Hengartner, T. W. Mak, and R. M. Zinkernagel.1994. Enhanced establishment of a virus carrier state

in adult CD4⫹-T-cell-deficient mice. J. Virol.68:4700–4704.

6. Betts, M. R., D. R. Ambrozak, D. C. Douek, S. Bonhoeffer, J. M. Brenchley, J. P. Casazza, R. A. Koup, and L. J. Picker.2001. Analysis of total human

immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD4⫹- and CD8-T-cell responses:

relationship to viral load in untreated HIV infection. J. Virol.75:11983–


7. Binley, J. M., D. S. Schiller, G. M. Ortiz, A. Hurley, D. F. Nixon, M. M. Markowitz, and J. P. Moore.2000. The relationship between T cell prolif-erative responses and plasma viremia during treatment of human immuno-deficiency virus type 1 infection with combination antiretroviral therapy.

J. Infect. Dis.181:1249–1263.

8. Bitmansour, A. D., D. C. Douek, V. C. Maino, and L. J. Picker.2002. Direct

ex vivo analysis of human CD4⫹memory T cell activation requirements at

the single clonotype level. J. Immunol.169:1207–1218.

9. Bitmansour, A. D., S. L. Waldrop, C. J. Pitcher, E. Khatamzas, F. Kern, V. C. Maino, and L. J. Picker.2001. Clonotypic structure of the human

CD4⫹memory T cell response to cytomegalovirus. J. Immunol.167:1151–


10. Boritz, E., B. E. Palmer, B. Livingston, A. Sette, and C. C. Wilson.2003.

Diverse repertoire of HIV-1 p24-specific, IFN-gamma-producing CD4⫹T

cell clones following immune reconstitution on highly active antiretroviral

therapy. J. Immunol.170:1106–1116.

11. Borrow, P., H. Lewicki, B. H. Hahn, G. M. Shaw, and M. B. Oldstone.1994.

Virus-specific CD8⫹cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity associated with control

of viremia in primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J.


12. Bourgeois, C., B. Rocha, and C. Tanchot.2002. A role for CD40 expression

on CD8⫹T cells in the generation of CD8⫹T cell memory. Science297:


13. Brosterhus, H., S. Brings, H. Leyendeckers, R. A. Manz, S. Miltenyi, A. Radbruch, M. Assenmacher, and J. Schmitz.1999. Enrichment and

detec-tion of live antigen-specific CD4⫹and CD8T cells based on cytokine

secretion. Eur. J. Immunol.29:4053–4059.

14. Bunce, M., C. M. O’Neill, M. C. Barnardo, P. Krausa, M. J. Browning, P. J. Morris, and K. I. Welsh.1995. Phototyping: comprehensive DNA typing for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3, DRB4, DRB5 and DQB1 by PCR with 144 primer mixes utilizing sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP). Tissue


15. Carcelain, G., R. Tubiana, A. Samri, V. Calvez, C. Delaugerre, H. Agut, C. Katlama, and B. Autran.2001. Transient mobilization of human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD4 T-helper cells fails to control virus rebounds during intermittent antiretroviral therapy in chronic HIV type 1

infection. J. Virol.75:234–241.

16. Day, C. L., G. M. Lauer, G. K. Robbins, B. McGovern, A. G. Wurcel, R. T. Gandhi, R. T. Chung, and B. D. Walker.2002. Broad specificity of

virus-specific CD4⫹T-helper-cell responses in resolved hepatitis C virus infection.

J. Virol.76:12584–12595.

17. Diepolder, H. M., J. T. Gerlach, R. Zachoval, R. M. Hoffmann, M. C. Jung, E. A. Wierenga, S. Scholz, T. Santantonio, M. Houghton, S. Southwood, A. Sette, and G. R. Pape.1997. Immunodominant CD4⫹T-cell epitope within

nonstructural protein 3 in acute hepatitis C virus infection. J. Virol.71:6011–


18. Douek, D. C., J. M. Brenchley, M. R. Betts, D. R. Ambrozak, B. J. Hill, Y. Okamoto, J. P. Casazza, J. Kuruppu, K. Kunstman, S. Wolinsky, Z. Gross-man, M. Dybul, A. Oxenius, D. A. Price, M. Connors, and R. A. Koup.2002.

HIV preferentially infects HIV-specific CD4⫹T cells. Nature417:95–98.

19. Draenert, R., M. Altfeld, C. Brander, N. Basgoz, C. Corcoran, A. G. Wurcel, D. R. Stone, S. A. Kalams, A. Trocha, M. M. Addo, P. J. Goulder, and B. D. Walker.2003. Comparison of overlapping peptide sets for detection of

an-tiviral CD8 and CD4 T cell responses. J. Immunol. Methods275:19–29.

20. Frahm, N., B. T. Korber, C. M. Adams, J. Szinger, R. Draenert, M. M. Addo, M. E. Feeney, K. Yusim, K. Sango, N. V. Brown, D. SenGupta, A. Piechocka-Trocha, T. Simonis, F. M. Marincola, A. G. Wurcel, D. R. Stone, C. J. Russel, P. Adolf, D. Cohen, T. Roach, A. StJohn, A. Khatri, K. Davies, J. Mullins, P. J. R. Goulder, B. D. Walker, and C. Brander.2004. Consistent cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte targeting of immunodominant regions in human

immunode-ficiency virus across multiple ethnicities. J. Virol.78:2187–2200.

21. Franke, E. K., H. E. Yuan, K. L. Bossolt, S. P. Goff, and J. Luban.1994. Specificity and sequence requirements for interactions between various

ret-roviral Gag proteins. J. Virol.68:5300–5305.

22. Gamble, T. R., S. Yoo, F. F. Vajdos, U. K. von Schwedler, D. K. Worthylake, H. Wang, J. P. McCutcheon, W. I. Sundquist, and C. P. Hill.1997. Structure

on November 8, 2019 by guest



of the carboxyl-terminal dimerization domain of the HIV-1 capsid protein.


23. Gitti, R. K., B. M. Lee, J. Walker, M. F. Summers, S. Yoo, and W. I. Sundquist.1996. Structure of the amino-terminal core domain of the HIV-1

capsid protein. Science273:231–235.

24. Grakoui, A., N. H. Shoukry, D. J. Woollard, J. H. Han, H. L. Hanson, J. Ghrayeb, K. K. Murthy, C. M. Rice, and C. M. Walker.2003. HCV persis-tence and immune evasion in the absence of memory T cell help. Science


25. Harari, A., S. Petitpierre, F. Vallelian, and G. Pantaleo.2003. Skewed representation of functionally distinct populations of virus-specific CD4 T cells in HIV-1-infected subjects with progressive disease: changes after

an-tiretroviral therapy. Blood103:966–972.

26. Hioe, C. E., M. Tuen, P. C. Chien, Jr., G. Jones, S. Ratto-Kim, P. J. Norris, W. J. Moretto, D. F. Nixon, M. K. Gorny, and S. Zolla-Pazner.2001. Inhi-bition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 presentation to CD4 T cells by antibodies specific for the CD4 binding domain of gp120. J. Virol.


27. Iyasere, C. A., J. C. Tilton, A. J. Johnson, S. Younes, B. Yassine-Diab, R. P. Sekaly, W. W. Kwok, S. A. Migueles, A. C. Laborico, W. L. Shupert, C. W. Hallahan, D. F. Davey, M. Dybul, S. Vogel, J. Metcalf, and M. Connors.

2003. Diminished proliferation of human immunodeficiency virus-specific

CD4⫹T cells is associated with diminished interleukin-2 (IL-2) production

and is recovered by exogenous IL-2. J. Virol.77:10900–10909.

28. Jackson, A., and N. Warner.1986. Preparation, staining, and analysis by flow

cytometry of peripheral blood leukocytes, p. 226–235.InN. Rose, H.

Fried-man, and J. Fahey (ed.), Manual of clinical laboratory immunology, 3rd ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.

29. Janssen, E. M., E. E. Lemmens, T. Wolfe, U. Christen, M. G. von Herrath, and S. P. Schoenberger.2003. CD4⫹T cells are required for secondary

expansion and memory in CD8⫹T lymphocytes. Nature421:852–856.

30. Jin, X., D. E. Bauer, S. E. Tuttleton, S. Lewin, A. Gettie, J. Blanchard, C. E. Irwin, J. T. Safrit, J. Mittler, L. Weinberger, L. G. Kostrikis, L. Zhang, A. S. Perelson, and D. D. Ho.1999. Dramatic rise in plasma viremia after CD8⫹

T cell depletion in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques. J. Exp.


31. Kaech, S. M., and R. Ahmed.2003. Immunology. CD8 T cells remember with

a little help. Science300:263–265.

32. Kaech, S. M., S. Hemby, E. Kersh, and R. Ahmed.2002. Molecular and

functional profiling of memory CD8 T cell differentiation. Cell111:837–851.

33. Koup, R. A., J. T. Safrit, Y. Cao, C. A. Andrews, G. McLeod, W. Borkowsky, C. Farthing, and D. D. Ho.1994. Temporal association of cellular immune responses with the initial control of viremia in primary human

immunode-ficiency virus type 1 syndrome. J. Virol.68:4650–4655.

34. Krowka, J. F., D. P. Stites, S. Jain, K. S. Steimer, C. George-Nascimento, A. Gyenes, P. J. Barr, H. Hollander, A. R. Moss, and J. M. Homsy.1989. Lymphocyte proliferative responses to human immunodeficiency virus

anti-gens in vitro. J. Clin. Investig.83:1198–1203.

35. Leen, A., P. Meij, I. Redchenko, J. Middeldorp, E. Bloemena, A. Rickinson, and N. Blake.2001. Differential immunogenicity of Epstein-Barr virus

la-tent-cycle proteins for human CD4⫹T-helper 1 responses. J. Virol.75:8649–


36. Lotti, B., T. Wendland, H. Furrer, N. Yawalkar, S. von Greyerz, K. Schnyder, M. Brandes, P. Vernazza, R. Wagner, T. Nguyen, E. Rosenberg, W. J. Pichler, and C. Brander.2002. Cytotoxic HIV-1 p55gag-specific CD4⫹T cells produce HIV-inhibitory cytokines and chemokines. J. Clin. Immunol.


37. Malhotra, U., M. M. Berrey, Y. Huang, and J. Markee.2000. Effect of combination antiretroviral therapy on T-cell immunity in acute human

im-munodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Infect. Dis.181:121–131.

38. Malhotra, U., S. Holte, S. Dutta, M. M. Berrey, E. Delpit, D. M. Koelle, A. Sette, L. Corey, and M. J. McElrath.2001. Role for HLA class II molecules in HIV-1 suppression and cellular immunity following antiretroviral

treat-ment. J. Clin. Investig.107:505–517.

39. Malhotra, U., S. Holte, T. Zhu, E. Delpit, C. Huntsberry, A. Sette, R. Shankarappa, J. Maenza, L. Corey, and M. J. McElrath.2003. Early induc-tion and maintenance of Env-specific T-helper cells following human

immu-nodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol.77:2663–2674.

40. Matloubian, M., R. J. Concepcion, and R. Ahmed.1994. CD4⫹T cells are

required to sustain CD8⫹cytotoxic T-cell responses during chronic viral

infection. J. Virol.68:8056–8063.

41. McMichael, A. J., and S. L. Rowland-Jones.2001. Cellular immune

re-sponses to HIV. Nature410:980–987.

42. McNeil, A. C., W. L. Shupert, C. A. Iyasere, C. W. Hallahan, J. Mican, R. T. Davey, Jr., and M. Connors.2001. High-level HIV-1 viremia suppresses viral

antigen-specific CD4⫹T cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA


43. Migueles, S. A., M. S. Sabbaghian, W. L. Shupert, M. P. Bettinotti, F. M. Marincola, L. Martino, C. W. Hallahan, S. M. Selig, D. Schwartz, J. Sulli-van, and M. Connors.2000. HLA B*5701 is highly associated with restriction of virus replication in a subgroup of HIV-infected long term nonprogressors.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97:2709–2714.

44. Orlinsky, K. J., J. Gu, M. Hoyt, S. Sandmeyer, and T. M. Menees.1996. Mutations in the Ty3 major homology region affect multiple steps in Ty3

retrotransposition. J. Virol.70:3440–3448.

45. Ostrowski, M. A., J. X. Gu, C. Kovacs, J. Freedman, M. A. Luscher, and K. S. MacDonald.2001. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of human

immu-nodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific CD4⫹T cell immunity to gag in

HIV-1-infected individuals with differential disease progression: reciprocal

interferon-gamma and interleukin-10 responses. J. Infect. Dis.184:1268–


46. O’Sullivan, D., T. Arrhenius, J. Sidney, M. F. Del Guercio, M. Albertson, M. Wall, C. Oseroff, S. Southwood, S. M. Colon, F. C. Gaeta, et al.1991. On the interaction of promiscuous antigenic peptides with different DR alleles.

Identification of common structural motifs. J. Immunol.147:2663–2669.

47. Oxenius, A., S. Fidler, M. Brady, S. J. Dawson, K. Ruth, P. J. Easterbrook, J. N. Weber, R. E. Phillips, and D. A. Price.2001. Variable fate of

virus-specific CD4⫹T cells during primary HIV-1 infection. Eur. J. Immunol.


48. Oxenius, A., D. A. Price, H. F. Gunthard, S. J. Dawson, C. Fagard, L. Perrin, M. Fischer, R. Weber, M. Plana, F. Garcia, B. Hirschel, A. McLean, and R. E. Phillips.2002. Stimulation of HIV-specific cellular immunity by struc-tured treatment interruption fails to enhance viral control in chronic HIV

infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99:13747–13752.

49. Palmer, B. E., E. Boritz, N. Blyveis, and C. C. Wilson.2002. Discordance between frequency of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

(HIV-1)-spe-cific gamma interferon-producing CD4⫹T cells and HIV-1-specific

lympho-proliferation in HIV-1-infected subjects with active viral replication. J. Virol.


50. Panina-Bordignon, P., G. Corradin, E. Roosnek, A. Sette, and A. Lanzavec-chia.1991. Recognition by class II alloreactive T cells of processed

deter-minants from human serum proteins. Science252:1548–1550.

51. Pitcher, C. J., C. Quittner, D. M. Peterson, M. Connors, R. A. Koup, V. C. Maino, and L. J. Picker.1999. HIV-1-specific CD4⫹T cells are detectable in most individuals with active HIV-1 infection, but decline with prolonged

viral suppression. Nat. Med.5:518–525.

52. Planz, O., S. Ehl, E. Furrer, E. Horvath, M. A. Brundler, H. Hengartner, and R. M. Zinkernagel.1997. A critical role for neutralizing-antibody-producing

B cells, CD4⫹T cells, and interferons in persistent and acute infections of

mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus: implications for adoptive

im-munotherapy of virus carriers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94:6874–6879.

53. Robbins, G. K., M. M. Addo, H. Troung, A. Rathod, K. Haheeb, B. Davis, H. Heller, N. Basgoz, B. D. Walker, and E. S. Rosenberg.2003. Augmentation of HIV-1-specific T helper cell responses in chronic HIV-1 infection by

therapeutic immunization. AIDS17:1121–1126.

54. Rosenberg, E. S., M. Altfeld, S. H. Poon, M. N. Phillips, B. M. Wilkes, R. L. Eldridge, G. K. Robbins, R. T. D’Aquila, P. J. Goulder, and B. D. Walker.

2000. Immune control of HIV-1 after early treatment of acute infection.


55. Rosenberg, E


TABLE 1. Subject characteristics at time of analysis
FIG. 2. Individual peptide recognition by CD4 cells across the entire expressed HIV-1 genome
FIG. 3. Dose-response analysis of truncations of peptide p24133-15050% of this response
FIG. 4. Peptide p24133-150for CD4, 7AAD, CD69, and IFN-HLA-matched B cells, as well as HLA DR-transfected L cells, were incubated with the p24-specific CD T cells are restricted by HLA DRB1*1301 in subject LT04


Related documents

In Chapter 3, we probe the origin of hysteresis behaviour in perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with simultaneous measurements of cell open circuit voltage (V oc ) and

For the cultivation of China’s business administration talents, the management level includes junior manag- ers, middle managers and senior managers; the posi- tioning of the

The results (Table 2) revealed that the proliferative response to HHV-6 antigen in the presence of autologous antigen-presenting cells was inhibited by the addition of

The presence of DI RNAs in tombusvirus- infected plants reduces the accumulation of helper virus RNA and results in the development of attenuated symptoms similar to those caused

Firstly a literature review was undertaken to help better understand the theory behind fibre composites and secondly a series of small scale (coupons) and large scale

To evaluate whether HIPK2 interaction with the US11 protein could account for this unusual behavior, the intracel- lular distribution of EGFP-HIPK2b was determined after co-

The first transformation, from the colonial to the RLG model, was a gradual, adaptive transformation which occurred between 1947 and the 1970s, with the development of a

Searching to reconnect with birth relatives was negatively correlated with a dismissing attachment style, while those who searched to resolve personal issues had a greater need