Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
9-1-1981
A study of the conventional method of producing
spreads and chokes and the new technology by
using orbital motion (micro-modifier)
Sze-Men Lui
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please [email protected].
Recommended Citation
by
Sze-Men Lui
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the
School of
Printing
in theCollege of Graphic Arts and
Photography
of the Rochester Institute ofTechnology
September, 1981
Thesis advisor: Associate Professor Bekir E.
Arpag
t Micro-modifier is the trademark of equipment manufactured
by
C
ERT I FICAT E
O
F APPR
OVAL
MASTE
R tS
THESIS
T
h
is i
s to c
e r tify
t
ha t the M
aster' s
Th
esis o
f
S
ze
-
Men Lu
i
with
a
m
aj or i
n
P
rin t i
n
g T
echnol ogy
ha
s been
a
p p roved by th
e T
hes is
Co
mmittee
as s
a tis factor y
fo
r the the
s is re
q u ireme n t f
or
the M
aster o
f
Sc
ie n ce degr
ee a
t the
c
on v ocation
o
f S
e ptember , 1981
.
The
s is Co
mmitt
ee :
Bekir Arpag
T
hesis a
dvisor
Joseph Noga
G
r adu a te
a
d visor
I wish to acknowledge my warm appreciation to the
following
persons who have so generously responded with their
help
for making this thesis possible:Professor Bekir E.
Arpag,
Professor Walter A.Campbell,
Professor Joseph L.Noga,
Professor Julius L. Silver.A special note of thanks is extended to my advisor Professor Bekir
E.
Arpag
for hiskindly
assistance and advice. Appreciation is alsoexpressed to Professor Joseph L. Noga for his many suggestions and
his provision of some of the equipment and materials used in this study.
Also
deep
thanks to Professor Walter A. Campbell and Professor JuliusL. Silver for their careful review of this thesis.
And I cannot forget the School of
Printing
of the Rochester Institute of
Technology
which gave me this valuable educational experience.Finally,
more than anyone else, Iheartily
thank my parents, Mr.and Mrs.
Sai-Ying
Lui for theirlove,
encouragement and forteaching
me that I could do anything successfully if I wanted it and really
worked hard at it.
Page
LIST OF TABLES V
LIST OF FIGURES xiv
Chapter
I INTRODUCTION 1
Purpose 2
Definition of Terms 3
Footnotes for Chapter I 7
II REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE: THEORETICAL BASIS 9
Conventional
Contacting
Method 10Micro-modifier Method 15
Spread and Choke Scales 17
Important Considerations of
Making
Spreads and Chokes 18
Footnotes for Chapter II 22
III THE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM 23
Hypotheses 23
Methodology
23Test Objectives 25
IV EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 28
Interpretation of Results 28
Recording
Sheets 30How to Evaluate the Results and How to Use the
Prediction Equation 61
Summary
of Results 63Footnotes for Chapter IV 65
V CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 66
Conclusions 66
Recommendations 70
APPENDIX A. SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
APPENDIX B. COST FACTORS OF MICRO-MODIFIER AND CONTACTING METHOD IN THE EXPERIMENTS OF THIS THESIS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
72
301
304
1.
Recording
Sheets of Micro-modifier Method #1Experiment (Ml). 30
2.
Recording
Sheets of Micro-modifier Method #2Experiment (M2). 33
3.
Recording
Sheets of Micro-modifier Method #3Experiment (M3). 36
4.
Recording
Sheets of Micro-modifier Method #4Experiment (M4). 39
5.
Recording
Sheets of Micro-modifier Method #5Experiment (M5). 42
6.
Recording
Sheets ofContacting
Method #1Experiment (CI). 46
7.
Recording
Sheets ofContacting
Method #2Experiment (C2). 49
8.
Recording
Sheets ofContacting
Method #3Experiment (C3). 52
9.
Recording
Sheets ofContacting
Method #4Experiment (C4). 55
10.
Recording
Sheets ofContacting
Method #5Experiment (C5). 58
11. Comparison Table of Spreads and Chokes
by
Micro-modifier Method andContacting
Method Due toResolution,
Printing
Sharpness,
DotGain,
BaseDensity
and Contrast. 6412. Practical and Reliable Prediction Equation for
Making
Spread or Choke in Micro-modifierMethod. 68
13. Practical and Reliable Prediction Equation for
APPENDIX
-TABLES
Al. ANOVA
Summary
Table forIntensity
and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 73
A2. ANOVA
Summary
Table forIntensity
and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #1 Experiment. 75A3. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 77
A4. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #1 Experiment. 79A5. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Spread in Micro-modifier Method #1
Experiment. 81
A6. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Spread in
Contacting
Method #1Experiment. 83
A7. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Spread inMicro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 85
A8. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Spread inContacting
Method #1 Experiment. 87A9. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andSpread in Micro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 89
A10. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andSpread in
Contacting
Method #1 Experiment. 91All. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 93
A12. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #1 Experiment. 95A13. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain andSpread in Micro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 97
A14. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain andSpread in
Contacting
Method #1 Experiment. 99A15. ANOVA
Summary
Table forIntensity
and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 101
A16. ANOVA
Summary
Table forIntensity
and Chokein
Contacting
Method #1 Experiment. 103A17. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 105
A18. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Chokein
Contacting
Method #1 Experiment. 107A19. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Choke in Micro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 109 A20. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Choke in
Contacting
Method #1 Experiment. Ill A21. ANOVASummary
Table for pH and Choke inMicro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 113
A22. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Choke inContacting
Method #1 Experiment. 115A23. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andChoke in Micro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 117
A24. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andChoke in
Contacting
Method #1 Experiment. 119A25. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 121
A26. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Chokein
Contacting
Method #1 Experiment. 123A27. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #1 Experiment. 125
A28. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Chokein
Contacting
Method #1 Experiment. 127A29. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Exposure Time andSpread in Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 129
A30. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Exposure Time andSpread in
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 131A31. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 133
A32. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 135A33. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Spread in Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 137
A34. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Spread in
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 139A35. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Spread inMicro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 141
A36. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Spread inContacting
Method #2 Experiment. 143A37. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andSpread in Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 145
A38. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andSpread in
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 147A39. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 149
A40. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 151A41. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 153
A42. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 155A43. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Exposure Time andChoke in Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 157
A44. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Exposure Time andChoke in
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 159A45. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 161
A46. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Chokein
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 163A47. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Choke in Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 165
A48. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Choke in
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 167A49. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Choke inMicro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 169
A50. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Choke inContacting
Method #2 Experiment. 171A51. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andChoke in Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 173
A52. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andChoke in
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 175A53. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 177
A54. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Chokein
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 179A55. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #2 Experiment. 181
A56. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Chokein
Contacting
Method #2 Experiment. 183A57. ANOVA
Summary
Table forDeveloping
Time andSpread in Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 185
A58. ANOVA
Summary
Table forDeveloping
Time andSpread in Contacting'Method #3 Experiment. 187
A59. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 189
A60. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #3 Experiment. 191A61. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Spread in Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 193
A62. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Spread in
Contacting
Method #3 Experiment. 195A63. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Spread inMicro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 197
A64. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Spread inContacting
Method #3 Experiment. 199A65. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andSpread in Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 201
A66. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andSpread in
Contacting
Method #3 Experiment. 203A67. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 205
A68. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #3 Experiment. 207A69. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 209
A70. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #3 Experiment. 211A71. ANOVA
Summary
Table forDeveloping
Time andChoke in Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 213
A72. ANOVA
Summary
Table forDeveloping
Time andChoke in
Contacting
Method #3 Experiment. 215A73. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 217
A74. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and ChokeA75. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Choke in Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 221 A76. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Choke in
Contacting
Method #3 Experiment. 223A77. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Choke inMicro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 225
A78. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Choke inContacting
Method #3 Experiment. 227A79. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andChoke in Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 229
A80. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andChoke in
Contacting
Method #3 Experiment. 231A81. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 233
A82. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Chokein
Contacting
Method #3 Experiment. 235A83. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #3 Experiment. 237
A84. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Chokein
Contacting
Method #3 Experiment. 239A85. ANOVA
Summary
Table forDeveloping
Tempera ture and Spread in Micro-modifier Method #4Experiment. 241
A86. ANOVA
Summary
Table forDeveloping
Temperature and Spread in
Contacting
Method #4Experiment. 243
A87. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 245
A88. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 247A89. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Spread in Micro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 249
A90. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Spread in
Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 251A91. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Spread inMicro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 253
A92. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Spread inContacting
Method #4 Experiment. 255A93. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andSpread in Micro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 257
A94. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andSpread in
Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 259A95. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 261
A96. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 263A97. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Spreadin Micro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 265
A98. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Spreadin
Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 267A99. ANOVA
Summary
Table forDeveloping
Tempera ture and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #4Experiment. 269
A100. ANOVA
Summary
Table forDeveloping
Temper ature and Choke inContacting
Method #4Experiment. 271
A101. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 273
A102. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Resolution and Chokein
Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 275A103. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Choke in Micro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 277
A104. ANOVA
Summary
Table forPrinting
Sharpnessand Choke in
Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 279A105. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Choke inMicro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 281
A106. ANOVA
Summary
Table for pH and Choke inContacting
Method #4 Experiment. 283A107. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andChoke in Micro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 285
A108. ANOVA
Summary
Table for BaseDensity
andChoke in
Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 287A109. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 289
AHO. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Contrast and Chokein
Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 291Alll. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Chokein Micro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 293
A112. ANOVA
Summary
Table for Dot Gain and Chokein
Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 295A113. ANOVA
Summary
Table forDeveloping
Temperature and pH in Micro-modifier Method #4
Experiment. 297
A114. ANOVA
Summary
Table forDeveloping
Temperature and pH in
Contacting
Method #4Experiment. 299
Bl. Cost Factors of Micro-Modifer Method 302
B2. Cost Factors of
Contacting
Method 3031.
Slightly
off-register, no overlap providedby
aspread or choke.
"
1
2.
Overlap
providedby
a choke of the greenlettering
for easier press register. 13. SPREADS. 18
4. CHOKES. 18
5. The light fall-off at 48" and 96" lamp-to-film
distance. 19
APPENDIX - FIGURES
Al.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forIntensity
and Spread in Micro-modifier Method#1 Experiment. 74
A2.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forIntensity
and Spread inContacting
Method #1Experiment. 76
A3.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Spread in Micro-modifier Method#1 Experiment. 78
A4.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Spread inContacting
Method #1Experiment. 80
A5.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forPrinting
Sharpness and Spread in Micro-modifierMethod #1 Experiment. 82
A6.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forPrinting
Sharpness and Spread inContacting
Method #1 Experiment. 84
A7.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for pH and Spread in Micro-modifier Method #1Experiment. 86
A8.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for pH and Spread inContacting
Method #1 Experiment. 88
A9.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for BaseDensity
and Spread in Micro-modifierMethod #1 Experiment. 90
A10.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for BaseDensity
and Spread inContacting
Method#1 Experiment. 92
All.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Spread in Micro-modifier Method#1 Experiment. 94
A12.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Spread inContacting
Method #1Experiment. 96
A13.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Spread in Micro-modifier Method#1 Experiment. 98
A14.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Spread inContacting
Method #1Experiment. 100
A15.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forIntensity
and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #1Experiment. 102
A16.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forIntensity
and Choke inContacting
Method #1Experiment. 104
A17.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Choke in Micro-modifier Method#1 Experiment. 106
A18.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Choke inContacting
Method #1Experiment. 108
A19.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forPrinting
Sharpness and Choke in Micro-modifierMethod #1 Experiment. 110
A20.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forPrinting
Sharpness and Choke inContacting
Method #1 Experiment. 112
A21.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for pH and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #1Experiment. 114
A22.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for pH and Choke inContacting
Method #1Experiment. 116
A23.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for BaseDensity
and Choke in Micro-modifierMethod #1 Experiment. 118
A24.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for BaseDensity
and Choke inContacting
Method#1 Experiment. 120
A25.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #1Experiment. 122
A26.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Choke inContacting
Method #1Experiment. 124
A27.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #1Experiment. 126
A28.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Choke inContacting
Method #1Experiment. 128
A29.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Exposure Time and Spread in Micro-modifierMethod #2 Experiment. 130
A30.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Exposure Time and Spread inContacting
Method#2 Experiment. 132
A31.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Spread in Micro-modifier Method#2 Experiment. 134
A32.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Spread inContacting
Method #2Experiment. 136
A33.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forPrinting
Sharpness and Spread in Micro-modifierMethod #2 Experiment. 138
A34.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forPrinting
Sharpness and Spread inContacting
Method #2 Experiment. 140
A35.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for pH and Spread in Micro-modifier Method #2Experiment. 142
A36.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forpH and Spread in
Contacting
Method #2Experiment. 144
A37.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for BaseDensity
and Spread in Micro-modifierMethod #2 Experiment. 146
A38.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for BaseDensity
and Spread inContacting
Method#2 Experiment. 148
A39.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Spread in Micro-modifier Method#2 Experiment. 150
A40.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forContrast and Spread in
Contacting
Method #2Experiment. 152
A41.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forDot Gain and Spread in Micro-modifier Method
#2 Experiment. 154
A42.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forDot Gain and Spread in
Contacting
Method #2Experiment. 156
A43.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Exposure Time and Choke in Micro-modifierMethod #2 Experiment. 158
A44.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Exposure Time and Choke inContacting
Method#2 Experiment. 160
A45.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Choke in Micro-modifier Method
#2 Experiment. 162
A46.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Choke in
Contacting
Method #2Experiment. 164
A47.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Printing
Sharpness and Choke in Micro-modifierMethod #2 Experiment. 166
A48.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Printing
Sharpness and Choke inContacting
Method #2 Experiment. 168
A49.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for pH and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #2
Experiment. 170
A50.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forpH and Choke in
Contacting
Method #2Experiment. 172
A51.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forBase
Density
and Choke in Micro-modifierMethod #2 Experiment. 174
A52.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Base
Density
and Choke inContacting
Method#2 Experiment. 176
A53.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #2Experiment. 178
A54.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Choke inContacting
Method #2Experiment. 180
A55.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #2Experiment. 182
A56.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Choke inContacting
Method #2Experiment. 184
A57.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forDeveloping
Time and Spread in Micro-modifierMethod #3 Experiment. 186
A58.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forDeveloping
Time and Spread inContacting
Method #3 Experiment. 188
A59.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Spread in Micro-modifier Method#3 Experiment. 190
A60.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Spread inContacting
Method #3Experiment. 192
A61.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Printing
Sharpness and Spread in Micro-modifierMethod #3 Experiment. 194
A62.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forPrinting
Sharpness and Spread inContacting
Method #3 Experiment. 196
A63.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
pH and Spread in Micro-modifier Method #3
Experiment. 198
A64.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
pH and Spread in
Contacting
Method #3Experiment. 200
A65.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Base
Density
and Spread in Micro-modifierMethod #3 Experiment. 202
A66.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Base
Density
and Spread inContacting
Method#3 Experiment. 204
A67.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Spread in Micro-modifier Method
#3 Experiment. 206
A68.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Spread in
Contacting
Method #3Experiment. 208
A69.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Spread in Micro-modifier Method#3 Experiment. 210
A70.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Spread in
Contacting
Method #3Experiment. 212
A71.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Developing
Time and Choke in Micro-modifierMethod #3 Experiment. 214
A72.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Developing
Time and Choke inContacting
Method #3 Experiment. 216
A73.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Choke in Micro-modifier Method
#3 Experiment. 218
A74.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forResolution and Choke in
Contacting
Method #3Experiment. 220
A75.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Printing
Sharpness and Choke in Micro-modifierMethod #3 Experiment. 222
A76.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Printing
Sharpness and Choke inContacting
Method #3 Experiment. 224
A77.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
pH and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #3
Experiment. 226
A78.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variablefor.
pH and Choke inContacting
Method #3Experiment. 228
A79.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residualand
Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Base
Density
and Choke in Micro-modifierMethod #3 Experiment. 230
A80.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Base
Density
and Choke inContacting
Method#3 Experiment. 232
A81.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #3Experiment. 234
A82.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Choke in
Contacting
Method #3Experiment. 236
A83.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #3
Experiment. 238
A84.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Choke in
Contacting
Method #3Experiment. 240
A85.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Developing
Temperature and Spread inMicro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 242
A86.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forDeveloping
Temperature and Spread in Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 244A87.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Spread in Micro-modifier Method
#4 Experiment. 246
A88.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Resolution and Spread in
Contacting
Method #4Experiment.
~
248
A89.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Printing
Sharpness and Spread in Micro-modifierMethod #4 Experiment. 250
A90.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Printing
Sharpness and Spread inContacting
Method #4 Experiment. 252
A91.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
pH and Spread in Micro-modifier Method #4
Experiment. 254
A92.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
pH and Spread in
Contacting
Method #4 Experiment. 256
A93.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for BaseDensity
and Spread in Micro-modifierMethod #4 Experiment. 258
A94.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for BaseDensity
and Spread inContacting
Method#4 Experiment. 260
A95.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Contrast and Spread in Micro-modifier Method
#4 Experiment. 262
A96.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Contrast and Spread inContacting
Method #4Experiment. 264
A97.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Spread in Micro-modifier Method#4 Experiment. 266
A98.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Spread inContacting
Method #4Experiment. 268
A99.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forDeveloping
Temperature and Choke inMicro-modifier Method #4 Experiment. 270
A100.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forDeveloping
Temperature and Choke inContacting
Method #4 Experiment. 272
A101.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Choke in Micro-modifier Method#4 Experiment. 274
A102.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Resolution and Choke inContacting
Method #4Experiment. 276
A103.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forPrinting
Sharpness and Choke in Micro-modifierMethod #4 Experiment. 278
A104.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forPrinting
Sharpness and Choke inContacting
Method #4 Experiment. 280
A105.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for pH and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #4Experiment. 282
A106.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for pH and Choke inContacting
Method #4Experiment. 284
A107.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable for BaseDensity
and Choke in Micro-modifierMethod #4 Experiment. 286
A108.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forBase
Density
and Choke inContacting
Method#4 Experiment. 288
A109.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forContrast and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #4
Experiment. 290
A110.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual and Predicted Standardized Dependent Variable forContrast and Choke in
Contacting
Method #4Experiment. 292
Alll.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for Dot Gain and Choke in Micro-modifier Method #4
Experiment. 294
A112.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Dot Gain and Choke in
Contacting
Method #4Experiment. 296
A113.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Developing
Temperature and pH in Micro-modifierMethod #4 Experiment. 298
A114.
Relationship
Between Standardized Residual andPredicted Standardized Dependent Variable for
Developing
Temperature and pH inContacting
Method #4 Experiment. 300
by
Sze-Men Lui
An Abstract
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the
School of
Printing
in theCollege of Graphic Arts and
Photography
of theRochester Institute of
Technology
September,
1981Thesis advisor: Associate Professor Bekir E.
Arpag
f
Micro-modifier is the trademark of equipment manufacturedby
A photographic process that produces thicker or thinner images
for color
trapping
in order to have easier registration in color printingis called spreads or chokes.
A study was made of the conventional
(contacting)
method of producing
spreads and chokes and the new technologyby
using orbitalmotion
(Micro-modifier)
with respect to the results on the filmsby
measuring the printing sharpness, resolution, dot gain, base
density,
contrast, accuracy and uniformity of spreads and chokes. A cost study
for both methods was also made.
A series of experiments were designed and done in order to com
pare the two methods. The experiment's data were processed
by
theRegression Analysis Program of SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences). The results included three parts: ANOVA (Analysis of
Variance), Prediction equations, and its graphical presentations.
The results of this study indicated that the Micro-modifier method
produced a better quality, higher accuracy and uniformity spreads and
chokes compared to the standard method. In the
long
run, the cost ofthe Micro-modifier method is more economical. Therefore the
Micro-modifier method is
highly
recommended.Some of the Reliable Prediction Equations can be used for
helping
inten-Thi
s s
t u d y
i
n d icat es that the Mi
cro-modifier
m
ethod
need
s
furth
er
st
u d y.
A
bst rac t appr
oved :
T
h esis
a
d visor
Title
and Department
'Spreads and Chokes' are important in stripping operations.
Spreads and Chokes refer to the contact procedure that
photographically produces thicker or thinner line images to provide color overlap for easier registration with multicolor
printing.
Slightly
off-register, no overlap providedby
a spread or choke.Figure 1
Overlap
providedby
a choke of the greenlettering
for easierpress register. 1
Figure 2
In the Graphic Arts
Industry,
quality control is the most vitalaspect in today's market. An effective quality control is 'a system for
integrating
the quality-maintenance, quality-development, andquality-improvement efforts of the various groups in an organization so as to
enable production and service to be at the most economical levels which
allow for full customer satisfaction'2
Strippers or cameramen usually make the spreads and chokes
by
using the conventional
(contacting)
method. Abouttwenty
tothirty
was no scale for measurement at all. We can say that the quality con
trol of the spreads and chokes was very poor
during
that time.Later on (around
1960),
due to technologicaldevelopments,
"spread and choke scales"
were invented to supply the strippers or
cameramen with a standard to
help
control spreads and chokes.Today,
there are many different spread and choke scales on themarket; in the spring of 1980
-at 'Print' 80 in
Chicago,
a new machinecalled 'Micro-modifier' for producing spreads and chokes was introduced
to the market
by
the Byers Corporation. This machine uses orbitalmotion to produce the spreads and chokes.
Until now, Micro-modifier is the only device on the market for
spreads and chokes other than the conventional contacting method.
Purpose
This thesis is to compare the conventional contacting method and
the micro-modifier method on producing spreads and chokes
by
measuring
the results on the films. The measurements include printing sharpness comparison, resolution comparison, degree of dot gain, base den
sity, contrast, and the accuracy and uniformity of spreads and chokes
in both processes. The author also attempted to create some predicted
equations for producing accurate and good quality spreads and chokes.
these terms are:
Chokes: Chokes is a contact process
by
whichletters,
solids, orother shapes are made "thinner" without altering their shape or relative
positioning. 3
Conductivity:
By
finding
the reciprocal of the resistance of amaterial, there is a measure of how well the material will conduct elec
tricity. This quantity is called conductance and is measured in mhos
(derived from ohm spelled backward). The symbol
(unit)
for conductance is an inverted capital omega,\s ; the letter symbol for conduc
tance is the capital letter G. In equation
form,
G = j|
(mhos)4
where G = Conductance
R = Resistance
If we apply the same voltage to a copper wire and a carbon "wire"
(filament), both at the same temperature and with the same
dimensions,
much less current flows in the carbon. This effect is related to the
nature of the material itself and is usually expressed as a property of
the material called resistivity, or the "reciprocal" property, conductiv
ity
5Increasing
the area ordecreasing
either the length or the resistivity will increase the conductance, but conductance decreases with
plate. 6
Contrast: The contrast in this thesis refers to the control gradi
ent for DuPont CRONAR Ortho S CRONALITH Control strips. The
control strips are used to determine and accurately control the photo
graphic activity of litho and contact developers in an automatic pro
cessor.
They
are 4by
10 inch strips of CRONAR Ortho S film that arepre-exposed with a
density
wedge and a numbered RelativeLog
E Scale.The Relative
Log
E Scale reading for adensity
of 3.50 shows the degreeof development and indicates the Effective Development Speed. The
difference in the Relative
Log
E Scale readings for densities of 3.50 and0.30 is used to determine the Control Gradient.
By
charting speed andgradient at specified time
intervals,
the activity of the developer can beclosely maintained.
7
Dot Gain: Dot gain is the dot size of the reproduction and can be
bigger or smaller than the dot size of the original.
Exposure: Exposure is the quantity of light that is allowed to act
on a photographic material. The product of the
intensity
and the duration of the light acting on the emulsions.8
Fringe: The soft halo surrounding small black dots (on a large
clear
field)
on original, first-generation (first generation is an originalcamera exposed
film,
second generation is a contact from the cameraexposed
film,
third generation is a contact from the second generationcontact) halftones.
by
light reflected from the back surface of the support.10Halftone: The reproduction of continuous-tone artwork, such as a
photograph which has gradations or variations in tone, through a
cross-line or contract screen, which converts the image into dots of various
sizes. * x
Negative: Negative is where the subject is clear on an opaque
film.12
Original copy: Original copy is the original subject to be modi
fied.13
pH: A measure of the degree of acidity or alkalinity of a solution.
In a neutral solution the pH value is 7. In acid solutions it ranges
from 0 to 7 and in alkaline solutions it ranges from 7 to 14. 14
Positive: Positive is where the subject is opaque on a clear film.15
Printing sharpness:
During
the printing process, a relativechange in dot size will occur.
Sharpness is measured
by
takingdensity
measurements ofboth a solid patch and a tint patch on whatever colors are
being
printed. Once a degree of sharpness has been determined to be optimum for a given paper and ink combina tion, a change in this ratio will give a signal when some thing is changing
during
the press run.Usually
a processthat starts to lose its printing sharpness and tends to print
between the dots will make middletone areas of the repro
duction appear too dark and will
dirty
up the colors.Sharpness can be computed
by dividing
thedensity
of thesolid into the
density
of the tintbeing
measured for eachcolor.
_,
density
of tintSharpness =
If the dot size on the printed sheet is approximately the same as that
on the printing plate, we can assume that the print is of perfect sharp
ness. The lower the sharpness value the more sharpness.
Resolution: Resolution is the ability (the
degree)
to reproducefineness of
detail,
usually expressed in lines per millimeter.Spreads: Spreads is a contact process
by
whichletters,
solids,or other shapes are made "fatter" without altering their shape or rela
tive positioning. 17
Strippers: The strippers are the persons who arrange and tape
all the negatives on a sheet of goldenrod paper, according to a
ruled-out layout for the plate to be made.18
Stripping:
Stripping
is the process of precisely positioning andfastening
one or more film negatives, or film positives, onto a plate-sizemasking sheet so that those film images can be exposed in the desired
positions on the printing plate. It is also referred to as image assembly.
The masking sheet with its taped-on film negatives, or film positives, is
called the flat (or goldenrod).19
Trapping:
Trapping
is the ability to print a wet ink film overpreviously printed ink.
Dry
trapping is printing wet ink overdry
ink.Film
Contacting
for the Graphic Arts (Wilmington, Delaware: E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.(Inc.),
1979), p. 48.
2
A.V.
Feigenbaum,
TotalQuality
Control (New York:McGraw-Hill Book
Company,
1961).3
John F. Holtz, More on Contacting
(Rochester,
New York: Eastman Kodak
Company, 1979),
p. 3.4
Robert L.
Boylestad,
Introducing
Circuit Analysis(Columbus,
Ohio: Charles E. MerrillPublishing
Company, 1977), pp. 46-47.5
Gregory
J. Nunz, Electronics in Our World (EnglewoodCliffs,
New Jersey:Prentice-Hall,
Inc., 1972), p. 118.Pocket Pal (New York: International Paper
Company,
1979),
p.176.
7
CRONALITH Control Strip
(Wilmington,
Delaware: E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.(Inc.),
1981).8
Holtz, p. 30.
9
Contacting
Procedures for the Graphic Arts(Rochester,
NewYork: Eastman Kodak Company, 1978), p. 41.
10 TU.J Ibid.
11
Pocket Pal, p. 183.
12
Owner Manual of Micro-modifier Model 5000 (Oklahoma
City,
Oklahoma: Byers Corporation, 1980), p. 4.
13 TK-j Ibid.
14
Rudolf F. Graf, Radio Shack New 1978-79 unabridged
Dictionary
of Electronics
(Indianapolis,
Indiana: Howard W. Sams &Co.,
Inc.,
1979), p. 522.
15
Holtz,
p. 31. 18John E.
Cogoli,
Photo-Offset Fundamentals(Bloomington,
Illinois: McKnightPublishing Company, 1980),
p. 21.19
Ibid.,
p. 220.20
Spreads and chokes are also known as spreads and shrinks or fatties
and skinnies and are used for easier press-register, to provide a print
ing
overlap between two images of different colors. (Trapping).Uses:
(1)
provide color overlap, where background color must notprint solidly behind the line
detail;
say yellow type in a black background.
(2)
fine linedetail,
such as in map work; a colorful line thatrepresents a road or stream may be spread when it is to be bordered
by
parallel lines of another color. This spread allows for slightmis-register while printing and so, a white line does not show between the
colors.
(3)
to outline images.(4)
to produce outlines or inlines ofcharacters.
(5)
to allow one picture to print inside another picturewithout noticeable difference between the two.1
Where a dark colored type is to print into a lighter colored back
ground, it is better to choke the lighter color rather than spread the
darker type. Conversely, if light colored type is to print into a darker
colored background, it is better to spread the lighter colored type
rather than choke the darker background. The reason for this is that
the darker color defines the size and shape of the type, and to change
the darker color would mean a change in the characteristics of that
particular type-face. So, the general rule is to spread or choke the
How much spread or choke is required is determined
by
the following
three factors:1.
Depending
on the register capability of the press:The finer a register the press can
hold,
the less theamount of spread or choke is needed.
2.
Depending
on color: A light color can be allowed tospread or choke more into a very dark background
without showing overlap.
3.
Depending
on size of type: Larger type(display
type= type that is 14
points and
larger)
can take morespread or choke than smaller type (text or
body
type:type that is 12 points and smaller, 1 point = 1/72").2
The traditional and the most popular method for the strippers or
cameramen is to make spreads and chokes
by
use of the conventionalcontacting method. Another most recently developed system for obtain
ing
spreads and chokes is the Micro-modifier unitby
Byers Corporation.Conventional
Contacting
MethodThis method needs a spacer between the processed original film
and a sheet of unexposed film in a vacuum contact frame. A
light-diffusion material such as opal glass or plastic is placed between the
light-source and the original film. The spread and choke scale is
placed beside the original film. Tissue paper or a matte film base also
can be used for the diffuser. The amount of spread or choke is con
trolled
by
the exposure.There are two types of contacts. One is called conventional con
pro-duce opposite images of the originals (from positive to negative or nega
tive to positive). Another is called duplicate contacts (also called
'dupes'
or direct contacts), it will produce duplicate images of the
originals (from positive to positive or negative to negative).
Equipment and materials used for contacting are:
Contact-Printing Frames: Pressure-type printing frames and
vacuum-type printing frames are usuable for making contacts. How ever, for getting better quality contacts, a vacuum-type printing frame is preferred. There are three major types of vacuum frames:
The conventional glass top frame: It is the most common, most
convenient and easiest frame to use. A crystal clear and polished plate glass is used. The disadvantages of glass top frames are: the surface
is easy to collect dirt and it must be cleaned very often with glass cleaner and cloth; the glass will slightly absorb and bend
light;
drawdown time is longer and the register pins must be used carefully when
the pressure is applied to the glass to prevent or eliminate breakage
and scratching.
The acetate overlay frame: This type of frame will offer a very
quick drawdown time but it will absorb and bend light and is easily
scratched, the acetate overlays needed to be renewed very often.
The glassless contact frame: Often called 'open face'
frame or vacuum easel, minimizes
dust,
breakage,
andlight-stopping
problemsfilm that completely covers the frame. Clean film cover sheets are more
economical and easier to change than the glass in a conventional frame. x
The Light Source: The point source light is the most common
light source, that is a narrow path of travel light from a small source,
either emulsion-to-emulsion or emulsion-to-base contacts it will give the
best image sharpness.
Mercury-vapor,
pulsed-xenon-arc, carbon-arcand quartz lamps will be used for the light source. A different expo
sure time will be required for each light source and it generally runs
between 15 and 75 seconds.
Safelights: Safelights will
help
to eliminate thehandling
errors inthe darkroom.
Backing Sheets: A
backing
sheet is used to place over the rubberblanket of the contact frame to eliminate the effects of blanket texture
and to avoid the misregister caused
by
the vacuum applied to the register pins on the blanket. A good
backing
sheet should have a stiff,uniform and dull surface with a slight grain allowed for air to bleed off
under the films. A black plastic or black cardboard typed sheet is
recommended to use. Dark red
backing
sheets also can be used, butthe effect is not as good as the black one. However, never use white
backing
sheets for they can cause halation problems.Contact Exposure Timers: A built-in timer on the vacuum frame
or a separate timer near the vacuum frame is required. The timer
should have a safelight directed on its face and should give maximum
accuracy in the normal exposure range
(by
seconds). Light integratorswill have the function of recording the total illumination of both the
Light-Intensity
Control: Alight-intensity
control is usuallyequipped with a contact
lamp
to adjustlamp
intensity
for accurate andsuitable exposure.
Diffusers: A light-diffuser (such as Rohm & Haas white Translu
cent Plexiglas
W-2447)
such as opalized glass or diffuse plastic sheetingis used to scatter the exposing light in a controlled manner.
Spacers: A spacing material
(spacers)
will be used to produce theexpected amount of spread or choke. A clear acetate or a clear graphic
arts film can be used. A .004 inch spacer or the base thickness of the
films can be used.
Spread and Choke Scales: The scale will
help
to monitor theamount of spread and choke.
Films: Either darkroom type contact films or
duplicating
films,
bright light contact films or
duplicating
films can be used,depending
the contact requirements.
Developer, Stop Bath and Fixer: Recommended chemistry combin
ations
by
the manufacturers will be used.Processors: Films can either be processed
by
machine (RapidAccess Processor) or
by
tray.Light Table, Magnifying Glass and Densitometer: A bright light
table, a high power magnifying-glass (50x with reticle is recommended)
and a densitometer (digital type and with automatic zeroing is pre
ferred)
are required forinspecting
the effects on films.Contact Room: A contact room is a darkroom type room where the
efficiency of the safelights and make it easier to clean the dust on the
walls, it should be painted with white (or another light color), smooth
and high-gloss paint. Eliminate the degree of reflection
by
suitablearrangement and locate the reflective objects such as the timer,
safe-light
housings,
wall charts, filmboxes,
etc. Separate safelightswitches and room-light switches for optimum safety.
The
following
are steps in making spreads and chokesby
usingthe conventional contacting method:
1. Clean the glass and frame with a glass cleaner and a cleaning
cloth.
2. A black
backing
sheet is placed on the contact frame.3. An unexposed film (contact film or
duplicating
film)
is placedon the
top
of thebacking
sheet, with emulsion side up.4. A transparent plastic spacer sheet is placed over it.
5. The original film is then placed over the spacer.
6. The spread and choke scale is mounted beside the original
film.
7. The vacuumframe glass is lowered.
8. The diffuser (a tissue paper or a matte film
base)
is mountedover the glass frame.
9. Vacuum is applied and the film exposed.
Micro-modifier Method
This method uses a plate of plexiglass to which the original film is
taped. This plexiglass revolves in a circular motion over the film to be
exposed. A point light source is above. One can dial-in a variety of
circular motions
by
adjusting the eccentric dial (in 1/1000 of an inchdiameter
increments),
the amount of circular motion results in changesin the amount of spreads or chokes. This is a simple machine and
takes only a little
training
to use it.Equipment and materials used for the micro-modifier method are:
Micro-modifier: This machine includes three basic parts: a light
housing
for point light source, machinebody,
and a table or counterspace.
The point light source
housing
must be suspended from theceiling and centered over the film board of the machine.
The suggested distance between the light aperture and the
face of the machine is 60" minimum and 72" maximum
(153-183 cm). The Micro-modifier 5000 has a base size of 39"
width x 33V depth (100x85 cm). The counter space re
quired must be at least 40"
wide x 30"
deep
(100x75cmminimum). A table or counter height of 30"
(75cm)
will beideal for the average operator. The power cord is plugged into a 110 Volt wall outlet.3
The important parts of the Micro-modifier are: copy carriage
(clear)
to put the original copy on, the film board(Red)
to place theunexposed film on, the adjustable eccentric dial to determine the size of
orbital motion the carriage will make and the size of the orbital motion
determines the amount of spread or choke, the dial plate with
The dial is set and adjusted with the dial
key by
inserting
it into the
key
hole andturning
thekey
to the desiredcalibration mark. The receiving hole accepts the carriage drive pin and transmits the motion to the copy carriage.4
A micrometer actually measures the orbital motion, the
intensity
selector has twelve fixed light
intensity
settings to provide a range ofintensities for exposing the
films,
the interval timer is a timer to control the exposure time with the range from 0 to 60 seconds and when
the exposure is completed, the timer will shut off and reset automati
cally. One motor drive switch is for
turning
the orbital motion on andoff and one main power switch is for
turning
the main power on andoff.
The other materials such as safelights, spread and choke scales,
films,
developer,
stop bath andfixer,
processors and contact room areexactly the same as those used for contacting.
The
following
are steps in making spreads and chokesby
usingthe Micro-modifier method:
1. The original positive or negative with a spread and choke
scale beside it is taped to the copy carriage, the emulsion
side of the film faces the operator.
2. The desired eccentric dial is then set.
3. The exposure timer and light
intensity
control are set.4. A sheet of film (either contact film or
duplicating
film,
depending on the requirement) is taped on the film board with
5. The copy carriage is lowered.
6. The motor drive switch is turned on.
7. If the dial indicator reading is correct, the exposure is then
started.
8. The motor drive switch is turned off when exposure is com
plete.
9. The copy carriage is gently lifted to the original position.
10. The tape is removed and the film is then processed
(by
machine or
by
tray).Spread and Choke Scales
Spread and Choke Scales are a device for
helping
the strippers orcameramen to monitor the amount of spread and choke.
Different scales have different
testing
methods and systems.Based on the knowledge of the author, the
following
spread and chokescales are used in the printing industry.
They
are DuPont Quick ChecksTarget,
DuPont Spread ChecksTarget,
Kodak Contact Control GuideC-2,
GAF Contact ExposureGuide,
Stouffer #1-T ResolutionGuide,
UGRA-GRETAG Plate ControlWedge
PWC,
and RIT Spread and ChokeSensitivity
Guide (also calledDigital Contact Guide).
The detail on how to use the scales will be obtained from manu
Important Considerations for making Spreads and Chokes
Principle: Whatever method is used, a negative will always give a
spread (Figure
3)
and a positive will always give a choke (Figure 4.SPREADS
-light source
original
upe-m
original
N^^^/spacer
CHOKES
dupe-Figure 3 Figure 4
Film: In either the Micro-modifier or conventional method, no
matter whether darkroom type contact film or
duplicating films,
brightlight contact film or
duplicating
films are used, one very importantrequirement is that the film must be of high contrast.
Lamp
-film Distance:The
lamp
distance should be great enough to cover theprinting frame with even
illumination,
but short enough forpractical exposure times.5
Maximum Image Area Minimum
Lamp
Distance8"xl0"
29 inches Il"xl4"
40 inches 16"x20"
58 inches
20"x24"
71 inches
24"x24"
71 inches 24"x32"
90 inches 30"x40"
112 inches 40"x50"
143 inches 40"x60"
161 inches
Point-light source: The
following
figure shows the difference oflight fall-off at 48" and 96" lamp-to-film distance.
< POINT LIGHT /.Tv SOURCE
//|\
\
$
POINTLIGHT SOURCEl
\
1
1
j
;!i
1
1 K\
\
/
\\ \
1
!\i
\ \
\
1' :
1
/ ! '
48" \
Al i~X'8B- 7T^
/
s'T^XXj?/BT \ 94 W~>
^u. /
I g4 BS:
/ 9* + 9B"~
9*' / /
9B1 BB BB\~" ' .
/ , t-^-t- 16x20"
y y .. ! I
AsA&Al -941