COMMISSION
OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
The farm accountancy
data network
.liBRAR'i.
~'<>,;... • • • •Farm accounts
results\
Ji
1978/79-1981/82
.
.,..__,_
COMMISSION
OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
The farm accountancy
data network FADN
Farm accou
results
This publication is also available in the following languages:
DE ISBN 92-825-5077-X
FR ISBN 92-825-5079-6
IT ISBN 92-825-5080-X
Cataloguing data can be found at the end of the handbook
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1984
ISBN 92-825-5078-8
Catalogue number: CB-40-84-901-EN-C
Articles and texts appearing in this document may be reproduced freely in whole or in
part so long as their source is mentioned.
CONTENTS
Foreword
1.
About the Farm Accountancy Data Network
1.1
Aims of the booklet
1.2
Field of survey and number of returning holdings
1.3
Classification of holdings and the weighting procedure
2.
Principal farm accounts results
2.1
Results according to principal type of farming
- 1978/79, 1979/80, 1980/81 and 1981/82 accounting years
2.2
Results according to farm size class
- 1978/79, 1979/80, 1980/81 and 1981/82 accounting years
2.3
Results according to utilised agricultural area
- 1980/81 and 1981/82 accounting years
2.4
Results according to income
- 1980/81 and 1981/82 accounting years
3.
Distribution of incomes in farming
4.
Explanatory notes
Abbreviations and definitions used in the Farm Accountancy Data
Network, ECU - national currency conversion
rat~s,and other
Preface
Any undertakin& - whether public or private - developing a given policy
has to avail itself of bhe basic information essential for the task.
This also applies to the Commission of the European communities and the
common agricultural policy. The collection, processing and analysis of
information is one of .the Commission's basic tasks without which it could
not perform the duties assigned to it.
This is why, in the sixties, alongside other systems, the Farm
Accountancy Data Network was set up. This network enables the
Commission, with the assistance of the Member States, to gather the
accountancy data required for analysing the situation of agricultural
holdings as a whole and also with reference to their type of far,ming,
size and geographical location.
Year by year the Commission, in close liaison with the Member States, has
been working to make the network more representative and thus increase
the reliability of the results. This is an ongoing project, but we
thought it would be useful to circulate the results for recent years at
this stage.
The purpose of this handbook is thus to offer broader access to a summary
of FAD& data and results for recent years and thereby promote knowledge,
study and use of them.
7
Claude VILLAIN
1.
About the Farm Accountancy Data Network
1.1
Aims of the booklet
The Farm Accountancy Data Network collects farm accounts from
individual holdings in Member States of the Community for each
accounting year and processes the data on a harmonised basis. A
standard accounts return is kept for individual sample holdings
throughout the Community.
The FADN thus collects a wide range of
useful information about the financial situation of farms, and
especially farm incomes, for different types and sizes of holding.
The
~
accounting year was the last for which detailed FADN
results were published in printed form.
Due to the enormous
volume of data in that publication, it was decided to produce the
results for subsequent years on microfiches, to allow the maximum
possible level of disaggregation. At the same time, annual
figures were included in the Commission•s annual report, "The
Agricultural Situation in the Community" at a highly aggregated
level for Member States only.
1.2
Field of survey and number of returning holdings
The FADH covers agricultural holdings in the Community on Which
the day to day management is in the hands of a single farmer or
manager, which have a labour input equivalent to at least 1 Annual
Work Unit (1), and whose major activity is agricultural production
for sale. Holdings in the FADH sample have a significant output.
They represent the most important target of agricultural policy
(2).
Table 1 gives figures for the FADH field of survey. These show
the coverage, in per cent, of the total number, utilized
agricultural area (UAA) and total standard gross margins (SGHs) of
holdings in the Community.
About
62~of all holdings in the
Community are in the field of survey. The percentages of total
UAA and SGHs - the latter can be taken as a proxy for agricultural
production - are substantially higher, both averaging
83~for the
Community.
Altogether the FADH covers about 3 600 000
agricultural holdings, two-thirds of the total number of persons
engaged in agriculture and
9~of milk production.
In addition table 1 shows the increasing number of holdings in the
FADH sample. In the 1981/82 accounting year a record number of
about 32.000 was reached, corresponding to an average sampling
fraction of
1~of the FADH field of survey.
(1)
For Italy, the Netherlands, Denmark and Ireland, the selection
threshold for labour input is 0.75 AWU.
(2)
on
and from the 1982/83 accounting year, for Which results have
not yet been published, selection thresholds in terms of European
Size Units (ESU) have been adopted.
~)
Table
1.
PAD& sample, field of survey and sampling fraction
FAD& field of survey
ITo. of holdings
lUmber of holdings
percentage of total
in field of
:---:
population:-
survey
re-Total
in the sample
:---:
presented by
:population· :
:Holdings: UAA
SGH
a single sample
D
F
I
B
L
IlL
DIC
IR
UIC
GR
IUR:
9:
IUR:
10:
(1)
1975(1)
:78/79
79/80
80/81
81/82
1975
1980
1980
holding
(1981)
907 856
3597
3832
4032
3837
66
82
82
104
1 315 141
4243
5247
5556
5840
71
77
80
113
2 664 177
7812
10573
11571
11976
51
71
74
95
138 067
911
940
958
958
61
96
92
71
6 213
97
113
120
146
85
93
94
21
162 594
1606
1633
1606
1560
87
95
99
73
132 263
1741
1826
1849
1747
77
87
96
51
228 007
958
1013
1080
1169
81
95
97
147
280 566
1741
1730
1741
2197
84
99
91
73
758 000
3003
111
5 834 884 :22706
26907
28513
29430
62
82.8
83
95
6 592 884
32433
97
Ccm.anity structure survey
1975,
except for Greece, Where holdings over
1
ha UAA in the
1978
national census.
1.3
Classification of holdings and the weighting procedure
Farms are classified according to type of production and economic
size using the Community far.m classification scheme (the Typology).
The type of far.ming is deter.mined by the relative contribution of
the various enterprises to the total standard gross margin of the
holding. There are
59
particular types, Which are aggregated
successively to
17
principal types and 8 general types.
Classification according to economic size of farm uses the European Size
Unit (ESU).
1 ESU is equivalent to 1000 EUA of standard gross margin.
Within each type of farming, six ESU size classes are defined. A further
regional breakdown of the FADN is made according to administrative
divisions within each Member State. The classification system is
illustrated below, in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Stratification of the FADN sample
EC-->Member
States----~Regions----~General - Principal - Particular
---~Size~---v---' '---~v---'
10 Member
States of the
Community
69 regions
of the
Community
8 general types of farming,
17 principal types and
59 particular types
6 economic
size
classes
Because the sampling fraction may vary between farm types, economic
size classes and regions, a weighting system is used to produce results
for aggregate groups of farms (e.g. all dairy farms in the Community).
The population used is the 1975 Community Farm Structure Survey (1).
Individual holdings in each cell at the lowest level of aggregation are
assigned a weighting factor. The total number of holdings represented
by the FADN sample is equal to the sum of the weighting factors.
In
theory, the number of holdings represented should be the same as the
total holdings in the field of survey but, for practical reasons, it is
not possible to sample holdings from every cell. Therefore, the number
of holdings represented is generally smaller than the number of
holdings in the field of survey.
(1)
Weighting will be based on a new Community structure survey as soon as
the data are available.
2.
Principal
fa~accounts results
The results given here are correct as at 1 June 1984. In a few cases
they may vary slightly from figures already published, as data for some
Member States have since been revised.
Results are given only for groups of
fa~swhich include at least ten
holdings at the most disaggregated level. In the aggregated results
all holdings - even those in groups of less than ten holdings - are
included in the calculations.
Details of the income concepts and abbreviations used can be found in
section 4.
2.1
Results according to principal type of
fa~ingResults according to principal type of
fa~ingare based on the
Community typology. Results are only given for principal types which
represent at least 100.000 holdings. A table in section 4 (page 77)
shows the relative importance of the different
fa~enterprises in each
of the principal types of
fa~ing.FADN
RESULTS
FOR
THE
MIN
TYPES
OF
FARtiS
tueER
OF
FAII1S
AVERAGE
SIZE
OF
FARit
AVERAGE
RESULTS
PER
FARit
REPRESENTED
IN
THE
UAA
LIVESTOCK
ESU
TOTAL
SUPPLZES
&
DEPRECIATION
SAMPLE
(HAl
UNITS
OUTPUT
SERVICES
(1000
ECU)
(1000
ECU)
(1000
ECUl
78/79
79.180
78n9
79.180
78n9
79.180
78n9
79.180
78n9
79.180
78fl9
79.180
78.179
79.180
78.179
79.180
ALL
TYPES
(
1
)
DEUT'SCHI.Atll
390217
391216
3597
3832
24.7
25.1
35.7
36.9
15.0
15.2
41.2
44.2
24.6
27.3
5.7
6.1
FRANCE
658577
647915
4243
5247
34.1
33.7
30.1
29.3
15.1
15.1
34.5
34.4
15.8
16.2
3.0
4.1
IT
ALIA
952591
1067414
7812
10573
10.2
10.1
6.5
6.2
5.9
5.6
13.6
13.8
4.5
4.6
1.4
1.4
BEL&IE-BELSUIUE
69ftlt2
70693
911
940
20.1
19.7
42.5
42.4
16.9
17.0
44.7
45.9
22.1
23.4
3.3
3.4
L.UXEttBaUR&
2954
3081
97
113
41.4
39.6
57.1
56.3
19.0
18.7
45.7
47.5
25.2
26.4
8.0
8.5
NEDERI.Atll
116386
1150lt2
1606
1633
17.2
17.4
53.7
54.6
26.9
27.6
69.4
72.3
37.9
42.6
6.4
5.7
D»>IARK
87030
86361
1741
1826
30.7
28.9
48.2
47.6
17.7
17.1
48.6
48.3
29.0
29.1
4.4
4.4
IRELNIJ
169486
163466
958
1013
30.9
28.3
33.4
35.2
5.6
6.7
17.1
13.5
6.2
6.9
0.9
1.1
UNITED
KDIIDCII
151719
146208
1741
1730
119.3
115.2
88.1
91.7
23.8
26.0
62.6
76.1
33.5
43.5
7.5
9.9
ELLAS
-EUR9
2S9M02
2691396
22706
26907
27.4
26.0
27.9
27.0
12.3
12.1
30.7
31.0
15.0
15.9
3.1
3.6
SOURCE:
FADM
(IIEIGHTED
ON
THE
BASE
OF
THE
1975
FARit
STRUC1URE
SURVEY)
FOR
DEUT'SCHLNIJ.
FRANCE.
NEDERI.At«l,
BELGIE.IBELGIQUE,
LUXEttBOURG.
DAN'IARK
AND
UNITED-KIN600tl
(EXCEPT
NORTHERN
IREI.Atll),
RESULTS
FOR
FAII1S
OF
LESS
THAN
4
ESU
ARE
NOT
INCLUDED.
RESULTS
FOR
GROUPS
CONTAINING
LESS
THAN
10
FARitS
IN
THE
SAHPLE
ARE
NOT
GIVEN
(
U
INCLUDING
THE
TYPES
OF
FARtiiNG
NOT
SHOWN
SEPARATLY
FARit
NET
VAWE
ADDED
FARit
NET
PER
AWU
VALUE
ADDED
(
1000
ECU)
(1000
ECUl
78.179
79.180
78.179
79.180
10.9
10.9
6.9
6.9
15.7
14.0
8.5
7.8
7.8
7.8
4.4
4.4
19.4
19.0
12.0
12.0
12.5
12.6
7.6
7.9
25.2
24.0
14.4
13.7
15.2
14.8
12.3
12.6
10.1
5.5
7.9
4.6
21.6
22.6
8.0
8.1
-12.6
11.6
7.1
FADN
RESULTS
FOR
THE
ttAIN
TYPES
OF
FARHS
IU'IBER
OF
FARMS
AVERAGE
SIZE
OF
FARM
AVERAGE
RESULTS
PER
FARM
REPRESENTED
IN
THE
UAA
LIVESTOCK
ESU
TOTAL
SUPPLIES
&
DEPRECIATION
SAMPLE
(HAJ
UNITS
OUTPUT
SERVICES
UOOO
ECUJ
(
1000
ECUJ
(1000
ECUJ
80/81
81/82
80/81
81/82
80/81
81/82
80/81
81/82
80/81
81/82
80/81
81/82
80/81
81/82
80/81
81/82
ALL
TYPES
U)
DEUTSCH
LAN)
I
403750399566
4032
3837
24.8
24.3
36.1
35.9
15.1
15.9
43.3
49.9
27.7
32.1
6.1
6.7
FRANCE
660639
659009
5556
5840
33.8
34.1
29.9
29.5
15.5
15.5
37.6
40.5
18.2
19.9
4.6
5.1
IT
ALIA
1149078
1141626
11571
11976
10.0
10.0
6.1
6.2
5.4
5.5
16.7
17.2
6.5
6.8
1.5
1.5
BELGIE-BEL&IQUE
67029
68178
958
958
20.3
20.0
42.7
44.5
17.7
17.7
46.7
55.4
25.0
28.8
3.5
3.7
LUXEI'EOURG
2999
3016
120
146
41.0
39.9
58.3
55.1
19.8
19.4
48.8
54.7
28.3
30.2
9.0
11.0
NEDERLAN)
113964
113700
1606
1560
17.2
17.5
56.2
56.0
28.1
28.4
76.8
87.6
46.0
49.6
6.1
6.7
DANHARK
89813
88965
1849
1747
28.2
28.6
46.4
46.5
17.4
17.7
52.8
63.4
33.0
37.6
4.8
5.2
IRELAND
168801
171664
1080
1169
31.0
30.9
33.2
32.7
5.6
5.5
14.8
18.2
7.5
8.3
1.3
1.4
UNITED
KIN&DCI't
153620
160806
1741
2197
114.6
104.1
91.0
92.0
25.2
25.8
89.9
110.0
51.3
61.3
12.5
13.6
ELUS
-332894
-3003
-5.3
-4.0
-·
3.3
-10.8
-3.5
-1.0
EUR9-EUR10
(1)
2809693
3139424
28513
32433
25.9
23.4
26.5
24.3
11.9
11.2
33.7
35.1
17.7
18.2
3.8
3.8
SOURCE:
FADN
lNEI&HTED
ON
THE
BASE
OF
THE
1975
FARI1
STRUCTURE
SURVEY)
FOR
DEUTSCHLAN),
FRANCE,
NEDERLAND,
BELGIE/BELGIQUE,
LUXEI1BOURG,
DANHARK
AtiJ
UNITED-KIN&DCI't
(EXCEPT
NORTHERN
IRELAN)),
RESULTS
FOR
FARI1S
OF
LESS
THAN
4
ESU
ARE
NOT
INCLUDED.
RESULTS
FOR
GROUPS
CONTAINING
LESS
THAN
10
FARHS
IN
THE
SAMPLE
ARE
NOT
GIVEN
(11
EUR9
FOR
1980/81
AND
EUR10
FOR
1981/82
(
2)
INCLUDING
THE
TYPES
OF
FARMING
NOT
SHOWN
SEPARATLY
FARM
NET
VALUE
ADDED
FARI'1
NET
PER
AWU
VALUE
ADDED
(
1000
ECUJ
(
1000
ECUJ
80/81
81/82
80/81
81/82
9.5
11.1
6.1
7.0
14.7
15.5
8.3
9.0
8.6
8.9
4.7
5.0
18.1
22.9
11.5
14.8
11.4
13.5
6.9
8.2
24.7
31.3
14.4
18.7
15.0
20.6
11.5
15.6
6.0
8.6
4.9
7.2
26.2
35.0
9.8
13.2
-6.3
-3.4
12.1
13.1
6.8
2.2
Results according to
fa~size class
The definition of size classes in based on the criterion Economic
Size Unit, equal to 1000 EUA of standard gross margin. Holdings of
less than 4 ESU are included in the results for Italy, Ireland,
Greece and Rorthern Ireland, where this
fa~size class is more
important than in other regions. However, in order to make a
comparison of similar groups, results are .also presented for all
holdings over 4 ESU.
Definitions of the income indicators used are given in section 4.
.::;
DETAILED
RESULTS
ACCORDING
TO
E~IC
SIZE
OF
FARM
ECONOI1IC
SIZE
AVERAGE
SIZE
OF
FARM
AVERAGE
RESULTS
PER
FARM
TOTAL
CAPITAL
FARtt
NET
VALUE
ADDED
OF
FARtt
UTILISED
AGRI-LABOUR
INPUT
TOTAL
OUTPUT
SUPPLIES
AND
DEPRECIATION
FARM
NET
PER
A.W.U.
PER
A.W.U.
CULTURAL
AREA
SERVICES
VALUE
ADDED
(
EUR.
SIZE
lloiiTS)
(HAl
(AWU)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECUl
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
DEUTSCHLAND
(
1)
<
4
-4
<=
8
14.0
14.3
1.3
1.3
18.5
19.8
10.6
12.3
3.6
3.6
4.3
4.0
80.,5
80.8
3.3
3.0
8
<=
16
21.5
21~9
1.5
1.5
35.3
37.6
20.5
22.5
5.2
5.6
9.6
9.5
99.5
99.3
6.2
6.2
16
<=
40
37.2
37.6
1.8
1.8
68.0
72.7
41.9
45.6
8.1
8.9
18.1
18.2
136.6
140.0
9.9
10.0
>=
40
80.0
80.2
2.8
2.8
138.4
147.8
84.0
95.0
13.8
15.1
40.5
37.7
184.8
183.2
14.7
13.4
\0
ALL
FARttS
24.7
25.1
1.6
1.6
41.2
44.2
24.6
27.3
5.7
6.1
10.9
10.9
109.2
110.3
6.9
6.9
ALL
FARHS
>4
24.7
25.1
1.6
1.6
41.2
44.2
24.6
27.3
5.7
6.1
10.9
10.9
109.2
110.3
6.9
6.9
FRANCE
(1)
<
4
-4
<=
8
19.5
19.4
1.6
1.5
17.6
16.1
8.1
7.8
1.5
2.2
8.0
6.1
34.2
44.7
5.1
4.0
8
<=
16
30.9
30.3
1.8
1.7
30.4
30.3
14.2
14.4
2.6
3.7
13.5
12.2
49.7
61.2
7.6
7.0
16
<=
40
50.6
50.0
2.2
2.0
54.4
54.7
24.9
26.0
4.6
6.3
24.9
22.4
67.4
84.3
11.4
10.9
>=
40
83.7
83.5
3.1
2.7
91.6
95.9
38.4
41.0
7.9
11.2
45.2
43.8
74.4
93.8
14.4
16.0
ALL
FARttS
34.1
33.7
1.9
1.8
34.5
34.3
15.8
16.2
2.9
4.1
15.7
14.0
52.2
65.3
8.5
7.8
ALL
FARMS
>4
34.1
33.7
1.9
1.8
34.5
34.3
15.8
16.2
2.9
4.1
15.7
14.0
52.2
65.3
8.5
7
..
8
---
~~--
---SOURCE:
FADN
(WEIGHTED
ON
THE
BASIS
OF
THE
1975
FARM
STRUCTURE
SURVEY)
(
1)
THE
GIVEN
RESULTS
DO
NOT
INCLUDE
FARMS
OF
LESS
4ESU
IN
THESE
N 0
DETAILED
RESULTS
ACCORDING
TO
ECONOMIC
SIZE
OF
FARM
ECONOttiC
SIZE
AVERAGE
SIZE
OF
FARM
AVERAGE
RESULTS
PER
FARM
OF
FARM
UTILISED
AGRI-LABOUR
INPUT
TOTAL
OUTPUT
SUPPLIES
AND
DEPRECIATION
CULTURAL
AREA
SERVICES
(EUR.
SIZE
UNITS)
lHAl
(AWlJ)
(
1000
ECUl
(
1000
ECUl
(
1000
ECUl
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
IT
ALIA
<
4
5.4
5.6
1.5
1.5
6.7
6.9
2.0
2.1
0.9
1.0
4
<=
8
12.1
12.2
1.9
1.9
14.5
15.8
4.5
4.9
1.5
1.7
8
<=
16
18.4
20.1
2.3
2.3
25.6
27.4
8.6
9.3
2.2
2.5
16
<=
40
35.7
35.1
3.4
3.2
53.4
58.1
18.7
20.3
3.8
4.3
>=
40
69.8
73.6
5.6
5.7
128.6
136.3
56.9
60.~
6.8
7.5
ALL
FARMS
10.2
10.1
1.8
1.8
13.6
13.8
4.5
4.6
1.4
1.4
ALL
FARMS
>It
17.8
18.5
2.3
2.3
24.6
26.8
8.5
9.3
2.1
2.4
BELGIE/BELGIQUEl1)
<4
-4
<=
8
9.9
9.7
1.4
1.3
20.3
20.2
8.7
10.5
1.7
1.5
8
<=
16
15.7
15.9
1.5
1.5
35.6
35.7
17.8
18.1
2.4
2.6
16
<=
40
29.3
27.1
1.8
1.8
65.1
66.7
33.1
34.2
4.9
5.2
>=
40
54.0
57.6
2.2
2.1
125.4
131.8
60.6
66.3
9.0
9.0
ALL
FARt15
20.1
19.7
1.6
1.6
44.7
45.9
22.1
23.4
3.3
3.4
ALL
FARMS
>It
20.1
19.7
1.6
1.6
44.7
45.9
22.1
23.4
3.3
3.4
SOURCE:
FADN
(WEIGHTED
ON
THE
BASIS
OF
THE
1975
FARM
STRUCTURE
SURVEY)
(1)
THE
GIVEN
RESULTS
DO
NOT
INCLUDE
FARMS
OF
LESS
4ESU
IN
THESE
COUNTRIES
TOTAL
CAPITAL
FARM
NET
VALUE
ADDED
FARM
NET
PER
A.W.U.
PER
A.W.U.
VALUE
ADDED
(
1000
ECU)
(1000
ECUl
(
1000
ECU)
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
3.8
3.9
31.6
32.6
2.6
2.61
8.4
9.1
45.0
49.7
4.5
4.7
I
14.8
15.7
60.4
62.9
6.5
6.7i
1
30.8
33.5
68.0
81.8
9.1
I
10.41
I
64.9
68.5
75.9
78.7
11.6
11.9i
7.8
7.8
43.1
45.0
4.4
4.4!
14.0
15.2
55.0
60.4
6.3
6.6'
I I '
-9.9
8.2
40.8
46.5
7.0
6.31
I
15.4
15.0
55.6
58.7
10.1
9.7
27.1
27.3
78.6
82.8
15.2
15.4
55.8
56.5
110.5
121.9
24.9
26.3
19.4
19.0
63.5
68.4
12.0
12.0
19.4
19.0
63.5
68.4
12.0
DETAILED
RESULTS
ACCORDING
TO
ECONOMIC
SIZE
OF
FARM
ECONOttiC
SIZE
AVERAGE
SIZE
OF
FARt1
AVERAGE
RESULTS
PER
FARH
TOTAL
CAPITAL
FARM
NET
VALUE
ADDED
OF
FARM
UTILISED
AGRI-LABOUR
INPUT
TOTAL
OUTPUT
SUPPLIES
AND
DEPRECIATION
FARtt
NET
PER
A.W.U.
PER
A.W.U.
CULTURAL
AREA
SERVICES
VALUE
ADDED
(
EUR.
SIZE
UNITS)
(HA)
(AWlJ)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
(1000
ECU)
I I .
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
LUXEttBOURG
(
1)
<
4
-I
4
<=
8
-8
<=
16
33.4
32.4
1.6
1.5
32.5
35.7
17.8
19.2
5.6
6.4
9.1
10.0
75.2
84.3
5.8
6.6
16
<=
40
51.8
50.1
1.8
1.8
61.9
65.4
33.9
37.0
10.8
11.6
17.1
16.8
130.1
137.9
9.3
9.1
I
N
>=
40
-I
-I I
ALL
FARMS
41.4
39.6
1.6
1.6
45.7
47.5
25.2
26.4
8.0
8.5
12.5
12.6
104.4
113.2
7.6
7.9'
I
ALL
FARttS
>It
41.4
39.6
1.6
1.6
45.7
47.5
25.2
26.4
8.0
8.5
12.5
12.6
104.4
113.2
7.6
7.91
I
NEDERLAND
(1)
<
4
-4
<=
8
-!
8
<=
16
10.0
10.2
1.3
1.3
35.1
37.3
20.0
22.8
2.8
2.5
12.3
12.0
110.0
108.1
9.2
8.9
16
<=
40
19.1
19.0
1.7
1.7
74.5
75.8
41.4
45.8
6.7
6.0
26.3
24.0
155.1
148.4
15.2
14.0
>=
40
38.1
38.3
3.3
3.2
175.0
186.7
91.2
103.6
18.7
16.5
65.2
66.6
184.6
169.7
19.8
20.6
ALL
FARMS
17.2
17.3
1.7
1.8
69.4
72.3
37.9
42.5
6.4
5.7
25.2
24.0
144.0
136.2
14.4
13.7
ALL
FARt15
>It
17.2
17.3
1.7
1.8
69.4
72.3
37.9
42.5
6.4
5.7
25.2
24.0
144.0
136.2
14.4
13.7
SOURCE:
F
ADN
(WEIGHTED
ON
THE
BASIS
OF
THE
1975
FARM
STRUCTURE
SURVEY)
(
1)
THE
GIVEN
RESULTS
DO
NOT
INCLUDE
FARMS
OF
LESS
4ESU
IN
THESE
N N
DETAILED
RESULTS
ACCORDING
TO
ECONOMIC
SIZE
OF
FA~
ECONOt1IC
SIZE
AVERAGE
SIZE
OF
FARM
AVERAGE
RESULTS
PER
FARH
OF
FA~
UTILISED
AGRI-LABOUR
INPUT
TOTAL
OUTPUT
SUPPLIES
AND
DEPRECIATION
CULTURAL
AREA
SERVICES
(
EUR.
SIZE
UNITS)
CHAl
CAWUl
C
1000
ECUl
(
1000
ECUl
(
1000
ECUl
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
DANI'IARK
(
1
l
<
4
-4
<=
8
11.9
12.3
0.8
0.7
17.1
17.9
10.8
11.4
1.4
1.6
8
<=
16
22.2
21.2
1.1
1.0
34.5
35.0
21.0
21.3
3.0
3.0
16
<=
40
45.9
41.2
1.6
1.5
74.9
72.9
44.6
44.1
7.2
6.9
>=
40
109.4
110.8
2.9
2.7
173.6
173.4
96.4
96.9
15.9
16.1
ALL
FARI'tS
30.7
28.9
1.2
1.2
48.6
48.3
29.0
29.1
4.4
4.4
ALL
FARI'tS
>4
30.7
28.9
1.2
1.2
48.6
48.3
29.0
29.1
4.4
4.4
IRELAND
<
4
19.4
16.6
1.0
1.0
7.0
5.0
2.0
2.1
0.3
0.4
4
<=
8
34.2
31.8
1.3
1.3
19.1
14.4
6.6
7.4
1.0
1.2
8
<=
16
56.3
52.0
1.7
1.5
38.1
29.5
14.3
15.7
2.0
2.7
16
<=
40
93.4
86.2
2.4
2.4
74.6
67.3
30.3
37.3
4.5
5.7
>=
40
-119.6
-3.3
-107.2
-51.3
-9.1
ALL
FARttS
30.9
28.3
1.3
1.2
17.1
13.5
6.2
6.9
0.9
1.1
ALL
FARf'tS
>4
47.5
44.1
1.6
1.5
31.9
25.0
12.2
13.2
1.7
2.2
SOURCE:
FADN
(WEIGHTED
ON
THE
BASIS
OF
THE
1975
FARM
STRUCTURE
SURVEY)
(
1)
THE
GIVEN
RESULTS
DO
NOT
INCLUDE
FARMS
OF
LESS
4ESU
IN
THESE
COUNTRIES
TOTAL
CAPITAL
FARI1
NET
VALUE
ADDED
FA~
NET
PER
A.W.U.
PER
A.W.U.
VALUE
ADDED
C
1000
ECU)
C
1000
ECUl
(
1000
ECUl
!
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
! I
-4.9
4.9
94.4
100.0
6.6
6.9
10.6
10.6
125.4
123.5
9.7
10.1
23.2
21.9
180.4
173.7
14.5
14.6
61.3
60.4
220.7
227.6
21.4
22.5
15.2
14.8
152.2
149.8
12.3
12.6
15.2
14.8
152.2
149.8
12.3
12.6
!
4.6
2.5
79.1
85.1
4.4
2.5
11.5
5.9
165.9
164.0
8.6
4.5
21.8
11.1
244.0
277.2
13.0
7.2
39.8
24.3
327.0
315.2
16.3
10.3
-46.8
-384.8
-14.0
10.1
5.5
149.6
160.3
7.9
4.6
18.0
9.6
217.8
227.9
11.4
N w
DETAILED
RESULTS
ACCORDING
TO
ECONOHIC
SIZE
OF
FARM
ECONOMIC
SIZE
AVERAGE
SIZE
OF
FARH
AVERAGE
RESULTS
PER
FARM
OF
FARH
UTILISED
AGRI-LABOUR
INPUT
TOTAL
OUTPUT
SUPPLIES
AND
DEPRECIATION
CULTURAL
AREA
SERVICES
(
EUR.
SIZE
UNITS)
(HA)
(AWtJ)
(1000
ECU>
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
UNITED
KINGDOI1
(
2)
<It
22.4
22.4
1.1
1.1
12.6
12.6
7.1
9.6
1.7
2.4
It<=
8
59.0
57.8
1.5·
1.6
19.6
23.9
9.9
14.1
2.5
3.4
8
<=
16
91.0
95.8
1.9
1.8
33.8
38.0
18.2
22.2
4.1
5.3
16
<=
40
151.6
142.9
2.9
2.8
73.7
83.4
40.7
48.6
8.8
10.8
>:i:
40
240.3
213.3
6.4
6.9
183.3
235.9
95.8
130.5
22.0
29.6
ALL
FARHS
119.3
115.2
2.7
2.8
62.6
76.1
33.5
43.5
7.5
9.9
ALL
FARttS
>4
126.2
120.8
2.8
2.9
66.1
79.9
35.3
45.6
8.0
10.4
ELLAS
<It
-It<=
8
-8
<=
16
-16
<=
40
->=
40
-ALL
FARttS
-ALL
FARHS
>4
-SOURCE:
FADN
(WEIGHTED
ON
THE
BASIS
OF
THE
1975
FARM
STRUCTURE
SURVEY>
(
2)
ALL
FARMS
OF
LESS
4
ESU
IN
THE
UNITED
KINGDOM
ARE
IN
NORTHERN
IRELAND
TOTAL
CAPITAL
FARI1
NET
VALUE
ADDED
FARM
NET
PER
A.W.U.
PER
A.W.U.
VALUE
ADDED
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU>
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
3.9
0.6
96.4
150.6
3.5
0.6
7.2
6.3
74.2
100.3
4.7
4.0
11.5
10.5
86.1
122.7
6.2
5.7
24.2
23.9
103.7
140.6
8.4
8.4
65.6
75.8
102.7
133.7
10.3
10.9
21.6
22.6
96.2
130.2
8.0
8.1
22.8
23.9
96.2
129.8
8.1
8.3
-DETAILED
RESULTS
ACCORDING
TO
ECONOHIC
SIZE
OF
FARM
ECONOttiC
SIZE
AVERAGE
SIZE
OF
FARM
AVERAGE
RESULTS
PER
FARM
TOTAL
CAPITAL
FARH
NET
VALUE
ADDED
OF
FARM
UTILISED
AGRI-LABOUR
INPUT
TOTAL
OUTPUT
SUPPLIES
AND
DEPRECIATION
FARt1
NET
PER
A.W.U.
PER
A.W.U.
CULTURAL
AREA
SERVICES
VALUE
ADDEO
lEUR.
SIZE
UNITS)
CHA)
(AWtJ)
(1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECU)
(
1000
ECUl
(
1000
ECUl
(
1000
ECU)
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
78/79
79/80
EUR9
<4
7.6
7.1
1.4
1.4
6.8
6.8
2.0
2.2
0.8
0.9
4.0
3.7
37.5
37.8
2.8
2.6
4
<=
8
18.3
18.2
1.6
1.6
17.1
17.2
7.4
8.1
1.9
2.2
7.8
6.9
ss.o
61.5
4.9
4.4
8
<=
16
29.1
29.1
1.7
1.7
32.0
33.0
16.0
17.1
3.3
3.9
12.7
11.9
75.6
83.4
7.4
6.9
16
<=
40
51.6
49.7
2.2
2.1
64.0
66.3
33.5
36.2
6.2
7.0
24.3
23.1
104.2
116.4
11.2
11.0
>=
40
117.6
111.8
4.2
4.3
141.4
161.7
71.1
85.4
14.0
17.1
56.3
59.2
110.6
128.5
13.4
13.8
ALL
FARHS
27.4
26.0
1.8
1.7
30.6
31.0
15.0
15.9
3.1
3.6
12.6
11.6
71.8
77.7
7.1
6.7
ALL
FARI'IS
>it
