Results of the EISfOM project investigation into the current situation of data collection and processing
22
0
0
Full text
(2) Outline . Brief introduction. . Objective and approach to get information. . Statistic Scope and countries which were focussed. . Overview about Organic DCPS in Europe. . Investigation of the results. . Conclusions. FiBL Frick.
(3) Brief introduction . European markets for organic products developed fast in recent years. . EU-research projects like OFCAP and OMIaRD have shown that in many countries data gathering takes place, however unsystematically. . Project results (OFCAP, OMIaRD) showed a high demand for organic production and market data. . However very basic data such as certified organic holdings, land areas and livestock numbers are reported currently. FiBL Frick.
(4) Objective of the 1. step of EISfOM project Objective: „Review existing data collection and processing systems (DCPS) for organic as well as conventional markets in order to understand their characteristics and identify opportunities for development and improvement.”. FiBL Frick.
(5) Approach to collect the information Close consultation with EUROSTAT 2-step survey in 32 European countries 1. Survey ¾ Which organisation collects data on which actor level? ¾ Which organisation operates which DCPSs? ¾ Main function of the organisation?. 2. Survey (5 sub-questionnaires) ¾ National DCPS harmonised to an international DCPS? ¾ Are organic data distinguishable in the DCPS? ¾ What type of data are collected (volumes, sales, prics, structures, ...) ¾ What about quality management, frequency, segmentation?. FiBL Frick.
(6) Approach to collect the information Partner 1. Partner n. Country 1. Farm Level. Structural Data. DCPS total data set. Country 2. Trade Level. FADN. Country n. Wholesaler / Processor Level. Certification Data (EU 2092/91). Retailer Level. Price Data. Consumer Level. Production Data. DCPS total data set where organic data are distinguishable. Supply Balance. DCPS organic data set. FiBL Frick.
(7) Studied countries and partner responsiblities • Scandinavia (DK, SE, FI, NO, IS) with DARCOF • Benelux (NL, BE, LU) with LEI • Central 1 (DE, SK, ES with University Kassel • Central 2 (CH, LI, TR) with FiBL • Central 3 (AT, SL, RO, BG) with University Innsbruck • Central 4 (HU, CZ) with ZMP • West (GB, IE, FR) with University of Wales • East (PL, EE, LV, LT) with University Warsaw • Mediterranean (GR, IT, PT, MT, CY) with University Ancona FiBL Frick.
(8) Evaluation of the national state of the art Organic DCPS. Evaluation. European Benchmark DCPS. FiBL Frick.
(9) Evaluation of the national state of the art 1. At least one DCPS with organic data collection 2. At least one DCPS where organic data are integrated into a total DCPS and distinguishable 3. At least one DCPS which allows a direct comparison between organic and total 4. At least one DCPS with organic data which bases on a census or representative approach 5. At least one DCPS with organic data collection at least once per year 6. At least one DCPS with organic data where data / reports are disseminated at least once per year 7. At least one DCPS with organic data which run data quality management systems. FiBL Frick.
(10) UK. Total. x. x. x. x. x. 10. x. x. x. 6. x. x. x. x. 9. Turkey. Switzerland. x. Spain. Sweden. x. Slovenia. x. Slovakia. 3. At least one DCPS which allows a direct comparison between organic and total. Romania. Norway. 11. Poland. The Netherlands. x. Luxembourg. x. Ireland. x. Hungary. Germany. x. Greece. Finland. x. France. Estonia. 2. At least one DCPS where organic data are integrated into a total DCPS and distinguishable. Latvia. x. x. x. Lithuania. x. Liechtenstein. x. Italy. x. Iceland. 13. x. x. Cyprus. x. x. x. Bulgaria. x. x. x. Belgium. x. x. x. Austria. x. x. 1. At least one DCPS with organic data collection. Farm Level - FADN. x. x. Denmark. Czech Republic. Overview Farm Level I. Filter: Only those DCPSs considered which apply for all paragraphs 1,2,3 4. At least one DCPS with organic data which bases on a census or representative approach. x. x. x. 5. At least one DCPS with organic data collection at least once per year. x. x. x. x. x. 6. At least one DCPS with organic data where data / reports are disseminated at least once per year. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. 10. 7. At least one DCPS with organic data which run data quality management systems. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. 10. FiBL Frick.
(11) x. x. x. x. Total. x. x. UK. x. x. x. Turkey. x. x. x. Spain. x. x. x. Switzerland. x. x. Sweden. x. x. Slovenia. x. x. x. Slovakia. x. x. x. Romania. x. x. x. Poland. x. Norway. x. The Netherlands. x. Luxembourg. x. Latvia. x. Lithuania. x. Liechtenstein. x. Italy. Hungary. x. Iceland. Greece. x. Ireland. France. x. Germany. 3. At least one DCPS which allows a direct comparison between organic and total. Finland. x. Estonia. 2. At least one DCPS where organic data are integrated into a total DCPS and distinguishable. Denmark. x. Cyprus. x. Czech Republic. Belgium. 1. At least one DCPS with organic data collection. Farm Level - FSS. Bulgaria. Austria. Overview Farm Level II. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. 28. x. x. x. 15. x. x. x. x. 13. x. x. x. x. x. 11. Filter: Only those DCPSs considered which apply for all paragraphs 1,2,3 4. At least one DCPS with organic data which bases on a census or representative approach. x. x. x. x. x. 5. At least one DCPS with organic data collection at least once per year. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. 11. 6. At least one DCPS with organic data where data / reports are disseminated at least once per year. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. 11. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. x. 11. 7. At least one DCPS with organic data which run data quality management systems. x. x. FiBL Frick.
(12) x. Total. UK. Turkey. Spain. Switzerland. Sweden. Slovenia. Slovakia. Romania. x. Poland. x. Norway. The Netherlands. Latvia. Lithuania. Liechtenstein. Luxembourg. x. Italy. Iceland. x. Ireland. x. Hungary. Germany. x. 3. At least one DCPS which allows a direct comparison between organic and total. Greece. Finland. x. France. Estonia. x. Denmark. x. 2. At least one DCPS where organic data are integrated into a total DCPS and distinguishable. Cyprus. x. x. Bulgaria. x. 1. At least one DCPS with organic data collection. Belgium. x. Austria. Farm Level Reg. 2092/91. Czech Republic. Overview Farm Level III. x. 9. x. 4. 3. Filter: Only those DCPSs considered which apply for all paragraphs 1,2,3 4. At least one DCPS with organic data which bases on a census or representative approach. x. x. x. 3. 5. At least one DCPS with organic data collection at least once per year. x. x. x. 3. 6. At least one DCPS with organic data where data / reports are disseminated at least once per year. x. x. x. 3. 7. At least one DCPS with organic data which run data quality management systems. x. x. x. 3. FiBL Frick.
(13) Switzerland. The Netherlands. Luxembourg. Liechtenstein. 4. x. 6. Total. x. UK. 7. Turkey. x. Spain. x. Sweden. x. Slovenia. x. Slovakia. x. Romania. x. Poland. x. 3. At least one DCPS which allows a direct comparison between organic and total. Norway. 7. Latvia. x. Lithuania. x. Italy. x. Iceland. x. Ireland. x. Hungary. x. Greece. Germany. x. 2. At least one DCPS where organic data are integrated into a total DCPS and distinguishable. France. Finland. x. Estonia. x. Denmark. x. x. Cyprus. x. x. Bulgaria. x. 1. At least one DCPS with organic data collection. Belgium. x. Austria. Farm Level Production Statistics. Czech Republic. Overview Farm Level IV. x. x. 10. Filter: Only those DCPSs considered which apply for all paragraphs 1,2,3 4. At least one DCPS with organic data which bases on a census or representative approach. x. x. x. 5. At least one DCPS with organic data collection at least once per year. x. x. x. x. 6. At least one DCPS with organic data where data / reports are disseminated at least once per year. x. x. x. x. x. 5. 7. At least one DCPS with organic data which run data quality management systems. x. x. x. x. 4. x. FiBL Frick.
(14) Norway x. x. 6. Total. x. UK. 7. Turkey. x. Spain. x. Slovenia. 10. Slovakia. x. Romania. x. Poland. Switzerland. The Netherlands x. Sweden. x. Luxembourg. x. x. Latvia. x. x. Lithuania. x. Liechtenstein. x. Italy. 3. At least one DCPS which allows a direct comparison between organic and total. Iceland. x. Ireland. x. Hungary. x. Greece. x. France. Germany. 2. At least one DCPS where organic data are integrated into a total DCPS and distinguishable. Estonia. x. Denmark. x. Cyprus. x. Bulgaria. x. Belgium. 1. At least one DCPS with organic data collection. Farm Level - Price Statistics. Austria. Finland. Czech Republic. Overview Farm Level V. Filter: Only those DCPSs considered which apply for all paragraphs 1,2,3 4. At least one DCPS with organic data which bases on a census or representative approach. x. x. x. x. 4. 5. At least one DCPS with organic data collection at least once per year. x. x. x. x. 4. x. x. x. 3. x. x. 3. 6. At least one DCPS with organic data where data / reports are disseminated at least once per year 7. At least one DCPS with organic data which run data quality management systems. x. FiBL Frick.
(15) Total. Spain. Slovenia. Slovakia. Romania. Poland. Norway. Latvia. UK. x. Turkey. x. Lithuania. Italy. Iceland. Ireland. Hungary. Switzerland. x. Greece. x. France. 3. At least one DCPS which allows a direct comparison between organic and total. Germany. x. Finland. x. x. Estonia. 2. At least one DCPS where organic data are integrated into a total DCPS and distinguishable. Denmark. x. Cyprus. x. 1. At least one DCPS with organic data collection. Belgium. x. Foreign Trade Level. Austria. Sweden. The Netherlands. x. Luxembourg. Czech Republic. x. Liechtenstein. Bulgaria. Overview Trade Level. x. x. 11. x. 3. x. 2. Filter: Only those DCPSs considered which apply for all paragraphs 1,2,3 4. At least one DCPS with organic data which bases on a census or representative approach. x. 5. At least one DCPS with organic data collection at least once per year. x. x. 2. 6. At least one DCPS with organic data where data / reports are disseminated at least once per year. x. x. 2. 7. At least one DCPS with organic data which run data quality management systems. x. 1. 1. FiBL Frick.
(16) 1. At least one DCPS with organic data collection. x. Total. UK. Turkey. Spain. Switzerland. Sweden. Slovenia. Slovakia. Romania. Poland. Norway. The Netherlands. Luxembourg. Latvia. Lithuania. Liechtenstein. Italy. Iceland. Ireland. Hungary. Greece. France. Germany. Finland. Estonia. Denmark. Cyprus. Czech Republic. Bulgaria. Belgium. Farm Level - Supply Balance Sheet. Austria. Overview Supply Balance Sheet. 1. 2. At least one DCPS where organic data are integrated into a total DCPS and distinguishable. 0. 3. At least one DCPS which allows a direct comparison between organic and total. 0. Filter: Only those DCPSs considered which apply for all paragraphs 1,2,3 4. At least one DCPS with organic data which bases on a census or representative approach. 0. 5. At least one DCPS with organic data collection at least once per year. 0. 6. At least one DCPS with organic data where data / reports are disseminated at least once per year. 0. 7. At least one DCPS with organic data which run data quality management systems. 0. FiBL Frick.
(17) 2. At least one DCPS where organic data are integrated into a total DCPS and distinguishable. x. 3. At least one DCPS which allows a direct comparison between organic and total. x. x. x. Total. UK. Turkey. Spain. Switzerland. Sweden. Slovenia. Slovakia. Romania. Poland. Norway. The Netherlands. Luxembourg. Latvia. Lithuania. Liechtenstein. Italy. Iceland. Ireland. x. Hungary. x. Greece. France. Finland. Estonia. Denmark. Cyprus. Czech Republic. Bulgaria x. Germany. 1. At least one DCPS with organic data collection. Belgium. Wholesaler / Processor Level. Austria. Overview Processor / Wholesaler Level. x. x. x. x. 3. x. x. 4. 6. Filter: Only those DCPSs considered which apply for all paragraphs 1,2,3 4. At least one DCPS with organic data which bases on a census or representative approach. x. x. 2. 5. At least one DCPS with organic data collection at least once per year. x. x. 2. 6. At least one DCPS with organic data where data / reports are disseminated at least once per year. x. x. 2. 7. At least one DCPS with organic data which run data quality management systems. x. x. 2. FiBL Frick.
(18) UK. Total. x. 3. Estonia. Denmark. Cyprus. Bulgaria. Belgium. Austria. Turkey. x. Spain. x. Switzerland. 6. Sweden. x. Slovenia. x. Slovakia. x. Romania. Norway. x. x. Poland. The Netherlands. x. 3. At least one DCPS which allows a direct comparison between organic and total. Luxembourg. 6. Latvia. x. Lithuania. x. x. Liechtenstein. x. Italy. x. Iceland. x. x. Ireland. 8. 2. At least one DCPS where organic data are integrated into a total DCPS and distinguishable. x. Hungary. x. x. 1. At least one DCPS with organic data collection. Greece. x. x. Retailer Level. France. x. Germany. x. Finland. Czech Republic. Overview Retailer Level. Filter: Only those DCPSs considered which apply for all paragraphs 1,2,3 4. At least one DCPS with organic data which bases on a census or representative approach 5. At least one DCPS with organic data collection at least once per year. x. x. x. x. 4. 6. At least one DCPS with organic data where data / reports are disseminated at least once per year. x. x. x. x. 4. x. 2. 7. At least one DCPS with organic data which run data quality management systems. x. FiBL Frick.
(19) 2. At least one DCPS where organic data are integrated into a total DCPS and distinguishable 3. At least one DCPS which allows a direct comparison between organic and total. Turkey. Spain. Switzerland. Sweden. Slovenia. Slovakia. Romania. Poland. Norway. The Netherlands. Luxembourg. Latvia. Lithuania. Liechtenstein. Iceland. Ireland. Hungary. Greece. France. Germany. x. x. x. 8. x. x. x. x. 6. x. x. x. x. 6. x. x. x. x. x. x. Italy. Finland. Estonia. Denmark. Cyprus. Czech Republic. Bulgaria x. Total. x. UK. 1. At least one DCPS with organic data collection. Belgium. Consumer Level. Austria. Overview Consumer Level. x. Filter: Only those DCPSs considered which apply for all paragraphs 1,2,3 4. At least one DCPS with organic data which bases on a census or representative approach. x. x. x. x. x. x. 6. 5. At least one DCPS with organic data collection at least once per year. x. x. x. x. x. x. 6. 6. At least one DCPS with organic data where data / reports are disseminated at least once per year. x. x. x. x. x. x. 6. 7. At least one DCPS with organic data which run data quality management systems. x. x. x. x. x. x. 6. FiBL Frick.
(20) Results . EISfOM survey with limited response rate. . Country reports of app. 30 countries available (www.eisfom.org). . Given overview represents current knowledge level of EISfOM project team (you are very welcome to comment / add). . In many countries unsystematic data collection of organic data. . In most countries nearly no public collection (know-how and relevant information are held by private institutions). . Mostly organic farm structure data available in Europe. . There are nearly no data on trade level available, but also organic data lack on consumer and retailer level and on production level (only rough estimates available). . Standardization is missing and organic data are seldom comparable to overal total data sets FiBL Frick.
(21) Conclusions . Currently few public DCPSs on an international level does exist with regard to the organic agriculture and food sector (however FAO, EUROSTAT, IFOAM have startes activities). . Less activities run to harmonise national organic data collection systems on an international level. . Investment decisions of market actors and support decisions of policy makers are taken under conditions of great uncertainty. . Organic data know-how in most countries concentrated on less and private minds. . Public demand for organic data presently often are just statements and action plan points to support organic farming in theory. . Partly the link is missing between political objectives (on national and international level) and realisation by statistic authorities. . EISfOM will assist all national and international efforts to improve organic data collecting in next two years FiBL Frick.
(22) Thank you. FiBL Frick.
(23)
Related documents
Health monitoring is performed on CNES spacecraft using two complementary methods: an automatic Out-Of-Limits (OOL) checking executed on a set of critical parameters after
Contact a Family has a special educational needs (SEN) helpline offering specialist advice on getting support in place for your child at school... 26
4.1.1.a Functional Requirements: Enterprise Data Management: Provide ESRI, ArcGIS and other GIS related software and system configurations in DPS’ “Virtual Vermont”.. • This
The cloud-based CRM system improves the efficiency of the entire marketing and business development process, from running events and capturing web queries to managing your
The World Health Organisation’s International Classification of Diseases system (ICD-10) definition 1 of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) states that this disorder arises as
The cross-sectional study design will be used in finding out the most affected occupations among the sandwich generation of women flood disaster survivors where the relationship
1. Instagram merupakan media yang paling banyak digunakan oleh responden baik untuk melakukan maupun menggunakan e-WOM sesudah maupun sebelum melakukan
Wel lijkt mij in het verlengde van Hoge Raad 12 december 2008 54 ver- dedigbaar, voor de toekomst, van de werkgever te verlangen dat deze de werknemer behoorlijk verzekert voor
