Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
9-1-1997
Developing Division: A Computer animation
thesis report
George M. Nadeau
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please [email protected].
Recommended Citation
Developing Division:
A Computer Animation Thesis Report
by
George M. Nadeau
Submitted in Partial FulfJllment of the
Requirements for the Degree of
Master of Fine Arts
MFA Photography Program, School of Photographic Arts and Sciences
Rochester Institute of Technology
Rochester, New York
September 1, 1997
Erik Timmerman, Chairperson
Associate Professor
School of Photographic Arts and Sciences
Marla Schweppe
Associate Professor
School of Photographic Arts and Sciences
Stephen Kurtz
Associate Professor
I,
GeorgeNadeau,
hereby
grant permissionto theWallace MemorialLibrary
at RTTtoreproducemythesisinwhole orinpart.Any
reproductionwill notbe for commercial useorprofit.Contents
Introduction 1
Section I: Developmentofthe
Story
1SectionII: DevelopmentoftheCharacters' Personalities/Functions 3
Section III: Visual DesignoftheCharacters 4
Section IV: Visual DesignoftheEnvironment 7
Section V: DevelopmentoftheAnimation 8
Section VI: DevelopmentoftheScore 9
Conclusion 10
References 11
AppendixOne: Thesis Proposal 12
AppendixTwo: Original Storyboard 17
Appendix Three: Final
Story
board 25Introduction
Thispaper offers a review oftheproduction ofmythesisanimationDivision.In it Iwill
describethechallengesI facedandtheapproachesIusedtoresolvethem.Theprocess was
organic and allthedevelopment decisionswererepeatedlystudiedandquestioned.
Consequently,
thispaperdoesnot attempttobeachronological record.
Rather,
thesections areintended onlytoorganizetheprocessintosix mainareasofdevelopment. The firstsection willfocusonthe
developmentofthestory,
including
thedefinitionofthemood and setting.Thesecondsection willfocusonthedevelopmentofthecharacters'
personalities andfunctions.
Next,
the thirdsectionwillfocusonthevisualdesignofthecharacters.The fourthsection willfocusonthevisualdesign
oftheenvironment.
Furthermore,
thissection willdescribeconsiderationsofthecharacters'
movementsintheirenvironment.The fifthsection willfocusonthedevelopmentoftheanimation.
Finally,
thesixth section will reviewtheaural componentofDivision.Section I: Developmentofthe
Story
After
determining
tocreateatragicstoryaboutenvy,Ibegan myresearch.Soon IstumbleduponAesop'sfable AvariciousandEnvious inwhichtwoneighbors appealto thegodJupiterto
granttheirwishes.Jupiteragrees undertheconditionthatwhateverhegrantsforone neighborhe
willgranttwiceas muchfortheother.Avaricewishesforandisgranteda roomfullof gold.
Accordingly,
Jupiterpresentstworoomsfullof goldtoEnvious.Envious,
whodoesnotliketoseeAvarice have anypleasure,wishestobe blinded inone eyeinorderthathisneighborwillbe
blindedin both.
Iwas
immediately
attractedtothisstory.However,
forpurposesofmy thesis, I believedthatthestorywouldbemore effectiveifthecharacters wishedfor
beauty,
notwealth;afterall,eventhoughAvaricewas
blinded,
theroomfulofgold remainedin hispossession.I decidedthat thecharactersshould wishfor something purelyvisual.Ofcourse,rainbows cametomind.Unfortu
nately,while
they
satisfiedthe requirement,I quicklyrealizedthatthey
presentedtheproblem ofdescribepossession andthe
doubling
effect would renderthestoryunclear.Next,
Iconsideredflowers.Initially
Iwasreluctanttoemploy flowers because NormanMcLarenpresents a similarthemewithasimilardevicein his Neighbors.Afterfurtherthought,
however,
Iconcludedthatmyanimationwouldbe sufficiently different.Suddenly,
my storydeveloped.
My
somberstory (withfleeting
momentsofdelight)
wouldbetoldusing flowersastheprincipaldevice. Onecharacter,
Schroeder,
would garden whilethe other,hisneighborDylan,
sunbathedin hisownyard.Theappearance ofeach ofSchroeder'sflowerswouldbefollowed
by
thegrowth oftwiceasmany in Dylan'syard.Ultimately
thegardener would attempttoblindhispassive neighbor.Inadditiontoportrayingthegardener'sself-destructivebehaviorasirratio
nal,I believed portraying his desiretoblindanoncompetitive,innocent bystander further demon
stratedhismadness.
Since envy dividespeopleIarrived atthe titleDivision.Italso refersto thebasicmath
ematicalrelationship betweenthe twocharacters.
Furthermore,
one candeconstruct"division"
intothecomponents "di,"
meaning twofold,and"vision."Bothcomponents aredescriptiveofplot
elements.
When my storywas presentedtoothersfor
feedback,
itwasmet withavarietyofreactions,fromappreciation andunderstandingtoutterconfusion.Iencounteredthesame range ofreac
tionswhenI laterpresentedtherough cut oftheanimation.On bothoccasionsIreexaminedthe
construction ofDivision. Iquestioned whetheritwastooambiguous and vague.
Certainly
Ireceivedseveralsuggestions ofwaysIcould(evenshould)delineatethe
characters'
motivations
andclarifytheconclusion.The minorityofresponsesthatwere positiveindicatedthatI had
presentedadequate pieces ofthepuzzleforsomeviewerstocomprehendthestory.
However,
filledwithself-doubt,Iwrestled withtheissueof
"broadening
theaudience."
This isthemost
difficultproblemto resolve,notjustwithDivision butwithallmywork.
Presently,
Iamfortifiedby
theattitude ofDavid Cronenberg. Indescribing
hiswork andhisrelationshipwiththe audience,
Cronenberg
oncesaid,"I'm assuminga certainlevelofinvolvegoforthelowestcommon
denominator,
a so-called'mass-audience,'
becauseassoonasyoudo
that,you'veautomaticallydiminishedyour
film."
Indeed,
my primarygoalisnottoproduce auniversallyappreciated work.I respectfully discountthecommentsfrom frustratedviewers about
theabrupt and unforeseenconclusion;I believemineistheidealcombinationoftheunpredictable
yetinevitableconclusion.Ialsodiscountthecriticismsregardingthe
characters'
lackof expres
siveness;I believe mycharacterseffectivelycommunicatetheirattitudesthrough their simple,
uninflected actions.
Furthermore,
sinceI donot requiretheviewertograspthemeaningofmyfilm
immediately,
I donotregarditasashortcomingwhenhe iscompelledtocontemplatemy filmafteritsscreening.Aftermuchdeliberation I havecometoacceptthat thereisalimitedaudience
for Division.
Section II: DevelopmentoftheCharacters'Personalities/Functions
Toreiterate,characterdevelopmentwasnot performed separatefromorsubsequentto the
developmentofthestory but istreatedseparately intheinterestoforganization.
Thegoalfor mythesisanimationwasto tellastoryaboutaman whois destroyed
by
hisenvy.
Therefore,
I determinedthatI onlyneeded onedevelopedcharacter and anincidentalcharacterfor himtoenvy.Schroederwas well-defined as a gardener whoproducesandappreci
atesbeautiful flowers.
Gradually
hispossessivenessandenvy isrevealed.Finally
he isexposed asmaliciousand self-destructive.Ontheother
hand,
Dylanhadnoidentity.Surely
itwas notnecessarytoattemptto
justify
theinnocent bystander'srighttohisvision. Infact,
earlysuggestionstodevelop
thesunbathingneighborweredisregarded because I feared hisdevelopmentwoulddistractfrom Schroeder'sstory.Dylanwasintended merelytobeavictim.
Eventually
Irealizedthat thesecond character presented anopportunitytoaddcomplexityto thestory.Toexploittheopportunity Dylanpresented,Iadoptedtheideaofmaking himmore
activeas apainter.
Thus,
symmetrywasintroducedto thepreviouslyone-sided story.AsaSchroederproduces real
flowers,
Dylanproducesrepresentations of them.Dylan'stalentprovides another substantial reasonfor Schroedertofeelcompetitivewithhim. Theaudience,
therefore,isencouragedtounderstandthedestructivebehavior Schroeder directstowardhis
adversary.
Significantly,
theirrationality
ofSchroeder'sultimate actisnot underminedby
theviewer'sinitialidentificationwithhismotivation.
Providing
Dylanwithanidentity
vasdy improvedthestory.
Oncethecharacters'
identitiesweredefined Iconcentrated ontheirphysicalfunctions. It is
essentialto
identify
the tasksthey
performbeforedesigning
theirphysicalstructure.Inbothcases,actionsarefewandrepetitive.
Dylanpaints
flowers,
leanstostudytheflowers in hisyard,andturnshis headtolookathisneighbor.
During
theentiremovieDylanstandsinplace.Consequently,
therewerenosignificantobstaclestoconsider whendesigningnisstructure.
Structural designconsiderationswere greaterforthemore activeSchroeder. Hewalks,
kneelsandrakes.Heusestoolsand setsthemdown. Schroeder'sinteractionwiththeearth and
his gardeningmaterialspresented a substantial challenge.
Furthermore,
therangeofmovementinhis
joints,
specifically hisshoulders,hipsandthumbs,requiredskillfulmodelingtomaintainsmoothness.
Section III: Visual DesignoftheCharacters
Having
definedthestory inwhichthecharactersactandthemannerinwhichthestorywouldbe told, I began
designing
DylanandSchroeder. Themost significanttraitthey
shareiscreativity.Iconnectedcreativitywith
fertility
anddecidedtorelatemymodelsto thefigurinesofmother goddessesthatwere worshippedinprehistorictimes.Ireferredspecificallyto thebest
knownofthese
figurines,
theVenusofWillendorf.While remainingmale,thecharacters wereendowed with someofthesensualandvoluptuousqualities ofthe
fertility
goddesses.Iemphasizedeach character'sbuttocksandstomach andtexturedeachwith a stone-like skin.Ialso
Iunderstoodthe challengescreated
by
pursuinga model ofamplecurvesandflesh. Toretainsmoothness,largejointsrequire morepolygons.In turn, more opportunitiesfor intersection
problems are created.
However,
Ipursuedthischaracterdesignbelieving
thatIcouldavoidtheproblems.
Ittookonlya shorttime tomodelSchroeder.
Unfortunately,
themodel'sinadequateintegrity
was revealed whenever motions were appliedtoit. Istruggledforweekstoresolvetheproblem
areas aroundtheshoulders andhips. I increasedthepolygon counttodiminishtheproblembut
theawkward shadows remained.Theawkward polygonsweresmallerbutstillvisible.Sincethe
problem oftheunsmoothjointswasdescribed mostly
by
shadows,makingthematerialclosertothevalue oftheshadowseffectively de-emphasizedtheproblem polygons.
Gradually,
theskinofthemodelbecamesodarkthat thefigurenolongerappeared volumetric.The blackenedmodel
appearedtobea
flat,
opaqueshadow.The onlyresemblanceto theoriginalcharacterdesignwasin itscontour.What I had intendedtoachievewithavoluptuouscharacterdesignwas
drastically
underminedwiththissolution.
Irevertedto theoriginalgrey,stone-likeappearance.Irealizedthatifpolygon problems
arisewhenthecharactermoves,it'sthemovementthatshouldbealtered.Topreventthecreation
ofunsighdy jointproblems,Iconsidered
limiting
thealready limitedcharactermovement.Remarkably,ittookafew days formetorecognizethefoolishnessofthisproposedsolution.
Sacrificing
movementtosave aninferiormodel wouldbepurestupidity.Firmly
attachedtomyfirstcharacter
design,
Iwasunwillingtoabandonit foranother.The daysoffrustrationturnedintoweeks.I didnotknow howtoproceed.
Then Iwas reintroducedto theworkofPhil Mulloy. In PossessionandThe Sound of
Musichecommunicates powerful messages withhissimpleanddirect
drawing
style.I learnedthattopreventhisworkfrom
becoming
tooslickhewouldsometimes closehiseyeswhendrawing
toinvitemistakestohappen.Heprefershisworktoappearveryrough,very directandfresh. Hisapproachinspiredme.
andjoints.ForthefirsttimeI begantoquestionwhysmooth surfaces areimportanttomystory.
My
immediateresponse wasthatsmoothnessis irrelevant. Iadopteda new approach.For my firstexperimentIcreated anewfencetoreplacethe existing,geometricallyperfect,
stereotypical,white picketfence.InlessthenaminuteI drewseveralhorizontalandverticallines
with a"rake"paintbrushin Fractal Design Painterandcreated a newfence. Itwasnotshaped
likea picket
fence,
soIabandonedtheideathatitneededtobewhite.Instead,
itwasblack,
imperfect,
andbeautiful. Whereas I hadtoiledforanhourtoproducetheidealwhitepicketfencewith precisespacing betweenalltheslats,Iwasabletocreate amorevisually
interesting
oneinafractionofthe time.Thiswas avaluablelesson.
Thenature oftheblack fence imagealsoprovoked anotherthought.The fencecouldbe
textured-mappedon aplaneinthreedimensionalspace,butitwouldremainessentiallytwo
dimensional. Ineededtoreexamine one ofmyoriginal choices.Ichose3Dsoftwaretoproduce
mythesisbecause Iamnot confidentaboutmy 2Danimationskills.And3D Studio MAXwas
developedtoproduce3D imagery. FromthestartofproductionIworkedundertheunchallenged
assumptionthatDivisionwould appeartobethreedimensional.
Suddenly
IrealizedI hadallowedthesoftware(andmy
facility
withthesoftware)todictatethevisualdesignofmyanimation.WiththisnewconsciousnessIwasbetterpositionedtoexploitmytools.
Without hesitation Ireturnedtomyproblematic,voluptuousmodel ofSchroeder. Ialtered
itsmaterialtomakeit black. Then Iused an
"optimize"
filteronthemeshtosubstantiallyreduce
thepolygoncount.Nolongerconcernedwithachievingasmoothappearance,Ireducedthe
polygonsoftheoriginal mesh untilthereweresofew remainingthatnearly everyvertex was
visible.Ratherthanwrestlewiththepolygonal nature ofthecharactermesh,I begantoenjoy it.
Theproductofthesealterations wasanangular silhouetteoftheoriginal model.Iadded stark
whitefacial featurestocompletethe transformation.(SeveralweekslaterwhenIrendered a shot
inwhichSchroeder's headwastilted tooneside,Irealizedthathiseyes and noseformthe
mathematical symbolfor
division.)
In justafewminutesIcreated acharacterdesignthatcouldIfelt liberated.
Accepting
imperfectionintheformof visiblevertices,perhaps even celebrating
it,
enabled metoanimatefreely. Ireasonedthatifavieweris easily distractedby
theseverebody
linesthen the trueproblem mustbetheuninterestingstory.SectionIV: VisualDesignoftheEnvironment
Assoon asDylanwasidentifiedas apainter,I hada clear vision oftheworldinwhichthe
actiontakesplace.Iwas reminded ofananecdotein Oliver Sacks An AnthropologistonMars.
Sacksdescribesapainter,Mr.
I,
whoexperiencedcerebralachromatopsiabecauseofa caraccident.Unabletoseecolor,Mr. Iwasdistressedwhenhecouldonly distinguish flowers
by
theirshape and smell.Hecould nolongerseethecloudsinthesky.Notsurprisingly,Mr. Ioften
dreamedthathewouldwaketoaworld ofcolor.Withthisinmind,I decided Divisionwould
beginas anachromatic world.Theviewerwouldthenbeasdelighted
by
theappearance ofbrilliantly
coloredflowersasMr. Isuggestedhewouldbe.Mostofmypreviousworkismarked
by
barrensettings.I haveemployed wastelandstodescribe lonelinessandisolation.
My
choiceof settings couldmerely beanindicationofmyinterest inminimalism.
My
consciousaimistobean economicalfilmmaker,
eliminatingallelementsthatareunnecessaryto thestory.Ofcourse,apracticalbenefitofthisapproachis faster
rendertimes.Althoughconsiderationofthepolygon countisnotthemost criticalfactor in design
ing
theenvironment,it isontheshortlist.Thereasonthegardenerandpainterdesiretocreate
beauty
is becausethey
see noneintheirenvironment.
Therefore,
thisstory,too, demandsabarrenenvironment.It is importantthatthepainter remain uninspired untiltheappearance oftheflowers. Ifpresentedwith agrazing
sheep inthe
distance,
or arollingtumble weed,orawheatfieldor slowmovingclouds,thepainter wouldundoubtedly be inspired. Isoughttopresentonlythenecessaryelements:the
canvas, thefencewhichdefinesownership,andthegroundfromwhichtheflowersgrow.
Originally,
whenI developedtheworldaroundtheVenusof Willendorf-inspiredcharacters,canvas.Alltheoriginal objects were replacedwhenthecharacterswere updated.Theeasel was
paintedtomatchthe
fence,
andthecanvas wasdefinedby
aquickly drawn blackrectangularoutline.
Updating
theground provedtobethemostdifficult.Itoften occupies agreat percentage ofthescreen,soits depictionwas a majordesignconsideration.Ipainted severalorganic,achro
matictexturesand mappedthemonthegroundplane.
Consistently,
the texturesobscuredthecharacters.
Among
theblackfence,
theblackfiguresandthetexturedground,therewasnotenough contrast.Thesolutionbecameapparent whenI decidedtopursuetheinherentparallelism
ofthecharacters.Thegroundisthegardener's canvas.I describedthepainter's canvaswithan
imperfectly
drawn blackoutline,sotheground shouldonly be definedby
animperfectly
drawnhorizon line. Itwas anobvious,simple solutiontoa problemthatvexedmefor days.
The final design decisions involvedtheflowers.
Originally
Ithought theappearance ofdifferently
coloredflowerswouldhelp
theviewer recognizethecorrespondencebetweenSchroeder'sandDylan's flowers.AfterfurtherthoughtI decidedthatsuch colorcodingwas
unnecessaryandpossiblycondescending.
Ultimately,
I decidedtheflowersshouldbe uniformlydepictedwiththecolor of passion.
Section V: DevelopmentoftheAnimation
As previouslystated, theanimation process was simplified
by
thedevelopmentof a moreforgiving
characterdesign.The lowpolygonmodel,withallits discerniblevertices,hadan unlimitedrangeof motioninalljoints. Amore complex model needstobe displayed
during
theanimation process, thusslowing it down. Inthis case,Iwas abletohidethecharactermeshand ani
matetheskeletonsecureintheknowledgethatwhenthemovementwas appliedto themodel
therewouldbenosignificant problems.In
fact,
Ineverhadtoperform renderstocheck whetheraposeormovementcaused a violationofthemodel'sintegrity.
Furthermore,
whenitwas necessarytomakeflipbookstoevaluatethe animation,renderingtimesaveraged undertenseconds a
TheonlyproblemIencounteredin animatingthe
black,
twodimensional-appearing
figureswas superimposition.For
instance,
inafrontalviewwhenSchroederplaceshis black hand infrontofhis blackchesthis hand becomes indistinct. Iresolvedsuch problemswithfourtech
niques.Oneofthemethods wastomovethecamerapositiontopresentamoredescriptive
silhouette.Ifthiswas notpossible,Imight alterthecharacter's pose.
My
thirdsolutionwastocreatenewwhitegeometrytorunalongthesuperimposedlimbtodefine itsposition.Ifallelse
proved
inappropriate,
Iused arendering filtercalled"outline."
With it Icoulddefinewhich
appendages shouldbeoutlinedwithanaliased whiteline. Iavoidedthis techniqueasmuch as
possiblebecause I disliketheline quality itproduces.
ThevisualdesignofDivisioncreatestheimpressionthatitwas produced withtwodimen
sional animationtechniques.Thethreedimensional quality becomesapparentonlywhenthereis
movement.Forthis reason,Ianimatedthecamera withtheappearanceofeverynewflower. I
intendtheselectivedescriptionofthree
dimensionality
throughtheuseof an animatedcameratoemphasizetheenrichmentofthelandscape
by
theflowers.Section VI: DevelopmentoftheScore
Althoughproductionofthescoredidnotbeginuntilthevisuals werecompleted,itreceived
considerablethought throughout theearlier stagesoftheprocess.
Initially
Iplannedtosend avideotapeoftheanimationtoadistantcomposer with whomIhadcollaboratedinthepast.
However,
by
the timeIwaspreparedtoworkonthe score,I decidedthatI hadtoomany ideastocommunicateandthatworkingwith alocalcomposerwouldprobablyproducebetterresults.
FivetimesImetwithIan
Quinn,
adoctoralcandidatein MusicTheory
attheEastmanSchoolofMusic.
During
our visits whichlasted upto twohours,
we watchedmyanimationrepeatedlyanddiscussedthescore.Though hehadneverproduceda score
before,
Ianwas abletoimplementand even enhancemyseminalideas.
Fundamentally,Iwantthescoretoexpressthesomber mood ofthestory.I believedthis
horns.Ianproduced a score withboththeseelements andincluded bellsoundstostrengthenthe
haunting
andironicnauticaltheme.Thegreatest requirement wasforthecreation ofsoundsthataccompanythegrowthofthe
flowers.
They
are neededtoalertSchroederto theunexpectedgrowth offlowers in hisneighbor's yard.Iimaginedeachflowerwouldmakea single notetoannounceits birthandlater
its death. Inthefinalactthegrowthofthehundredsofflowerswould produce a chorus.Ianwas
receptiveto thisidea. And he improved it immeasurably. Ratherthanmerely markingthebirthand
deathof eachflowerwithsinglenotes,Iansuggested
describing
thelife-spanofeachflowerwithasong.Hissolutionisamore effective and accuratewaytodescribethesustainedimpactthe
flowershaveonthelandscapesoIadopteditwithout reservation.
The directcommunication andnumerous meetings withmycomposeryieldedbetterresults
thanI hadexpectedtoobtain.Thecollaborationwithareceptive,intuitiveand
deeply
talentedmusicianencourages metoengagethecomposer earlierintheproductionprocessinthefuture.
Conclusion
InthispaperI havereviewedthemanychoicesImadein producing mythesisanimation.
TheproductionrarelyprogressedasI hadenvisionedit. Thecompletion oftheprojectdepended
uponmywillingnesstoreexamineearlyassumptionsanddecisions.Ireevaluatedthestory,the
identity
ofthe characters,andthevisualdesignofthecharacters andtheirenvironment.Whensomeofmy designgoals provedtobetoo exacting,itwasnecessaryformetocapitulate.Iwas
challengedtoabandonmyoriginalvisionand
develop
a new one.My
revisions requiredanimationconsiderationsthatwere unforeseen and presented new opportunities.
Lastly,
Ielectedtocollaborate onthescore with aninexperienced filmcomposerinsteadofworkingwith either of
themusicians with whomIhad previouslycollaborated.Whilethefinalproductvaguelyresembles
my initialconception,Iamhopefulthatviewers ofDivisionwillbeunawareoftheunavoidable
concessions andrecognizeonlytheartistry.
References
Carels,
Edwin."Anarchy
intheU.K."Plateau.May
1993: 4-6.Ferrante,
Anthony
C. "Is DavidCronenberg
aSickMan."
Film Threat.
February
1997:6-12.Sacks,
Oliver. An AnthropologistonMars. NewYork: Random House. 1995.Appendix One:
Thesis Proposal
Division
by
George M. Nadeau
Submitted in Partial Fulfillmentofthe
Requirements fortheDegreeof
MasterofFineArts
MFA
Photography
Program,
SchoolofPhotographicArtsandSciencesRochester Instituteof
Technology
Rochester,
New York April26,
1996Erik
Timmerman,
Chairperson Associate ProfessorSchoolofPhotographicArtsandSciences
Maria Schweppe
Associate Professor
SchoolofPhotographicArtsandSciences
Steve Kurtz
Associate Professor
SchoolofInformation
Technology
andComputer ScienceTreatment
Story
Inthe morning,Dylanstandsin his backyardwhichis defined
by
apicketfence. Hestands beforeaneasel and applies gessotoa canvas.Acouplehourslater heappliesfinishing
touchestohispaintingofaflowergarden.The imagecomesfrom his imaginationnotfrom hisenvironment.
Dylanstopspainting, turnsandwavestoSchroederwhohasenteredhisownbackyardwith
a
tray
ofgardeningtoolsand materials.Fromtheopposite sideofthepicketfence SchroederacknowledgesDylanand noticeshis brilliantpainting.Then Schroederturnshis backtoward
Dylan,
setsdown his tray,combsthe soil,anddropsaseedinto his flower bed. Schroedersmileswhena yellowflowerburstsfromtheground.Dylansighs.Schroederturns toseeDylan has
movedfrom behind hiseasel;Dylan liesontheground andexaminestwoyellowflowers in his
ownyard.Schroederquicklydepositstwomore seedsbeside hissingle
flower,
andtwomore flowerssproutthrough thesurface,one red andoneorange.AgainSchroeder hearssoundsemanating from hisneighbor'syard.Schroederturns toseeDylan appreciating histwored and
twoorangeflowersthatappearbeside histwoyellowflowers.
Schroederreachesfor hispacket of seedswhileglaringatDylan. Schroeder
inadvertently
prickshimselfonhis pruningshears.Bloodappears onhisright index finger. Dylanexclaimsand
Schroederturns toseehim examiningthebloodonhisrightandleft index fingers. Schroeder
raiseshisshearsandsnipsdown hisyellow whilewatchinghisneighbor's
flowers;
Dylan'stwoyellowflowerswilt.
Similarly,
whenSchroedercutshis remainingredand orangeflowers,
Dylan's fouruprightflowerswilt.Dylanobserveshissixflowers wilting inthegroundthenresumeshispositionathiseasel.
Schroederexamineshis flower bedandthe threeflower
lying
uponit. Schroederretrieveshispacket of seeds andscattersitsentire contents ontothesoil.Dozensof
brightly
coloredflowersappear.Despitethe
beauty
ofhisnewflowergarden,Schroeder is distractedby
soundsfrom Dylan'syard.
There,
twiceasmany flowerssurroundDylanathiseasel.SchroederglaresoverthefenceatDylanandhis largergarden.Then Schroederlooksathisown garden.
Schroedertrembleswithanger and clencheshis fists. DylanturnsandobservesSchroeder raising
ashinyobjectin his hand. Schroederthrustshis pruningshearsinto hisownrighteye.Cutto
black.
Aesthetics
Imageswithbestark and simple.Mostobjects andcharacters willbe smoothlymodeledin
white and grays.
Only
theflowers,
blood dropsandDylan's paintingwillbebrilliantly
colored.Additionally,
SchroederandDylanareidenticalexceptfortheireyes.Schroeder'sareblackbeadswhileDylan'sare colored andbeautiful.
Technique
Iwillproducethisstory in 3Danimationusing Electrogig's 3D-GO. Iwill renderimagesas
TIFFs,
transfer them toan opticaldisccartridgeandfinally
transferthemtoSVHS forediting.I intendtocollaborate withatrainedmusiciantoproducethescore.Sue
Doherty,
whohasanM. A. in Music
Composition,
assistedme withmy film Boxesandhasexpressedinterestinfurthercollaboration.Should Sue becomeunavailableIhaveanothermusician,Devin
Kirschner,
interested in assistingme withthisproject.Devinproducedthescorefor my film Nightlight.
Budget
Estimate In Kind ActualCost Scriptand storyboard 1500. 1500. 0.
Animation 20000. 20000. 0.
Sound 3000. 3000. 0.
Videotapes 50. 0. 50
Optical Disc Cartridge 200. 0. 200 8mmDataCartridges 80. 0. 80
Total 24830. 24500. 330.
Timeline
Iintendtoproducemythesisovertwoquarters andtoscreenmythesisattheend ofthe
Winterquarter of1996. 1willregisterfor 6creditsintheFalland6creditsintheWinter.
Pre-production April
script
storyboard
proposal
meet with committee
Production
May
storyboard
model
meet withcommittee
June-August
(notenrolledforthesiscredits)
model
animate
September
animate
meet with committee
October
animate
meet withcommittee
November
animate
produce rough cut
soundcomposition
meet with committee
Post-production December
reanimate, re-render where necessary
titles,credits
editing
sound composition
meetwith committee
January
editing
soundcomposition,editing
designscreeningposter
thesisscreening
thesisreport
meet with committee
Appendix
Two: Original
Storyboard
w
Svty
Z-f**f-rf
bvr&- ip-rpu^-vx*x
5"",/
"_ytfhOL*-"rv v>be
&)
#)
d-S
piA.*rbeyei,1<\_
&)
T5tvvC
ok-o-^t- c^-^i>-^
i^
Appendix Three:
Final
Storyboard
drop
seed 1 A&
birth
of rose2B 2C 3B 3C
f
00:01:42:13
\
ILN.
snip/dying IA
dead IA
Mu
dying
IB IC
I
$fl
mm2^Qm.
dead
IB iC
ft
\
V
%&to^i$mt
snip/dying 2 A
1%
im
m&mm
mmx&MM
snip/dying 3
Adead 2A
I
dead
2B 2C
/I
begin
toHo
were come toHfe
Uli^iMJ
painted
flowers
transformstill
life
painting
obscuredIff
mamm&m
L.
'>4:04M
\
idea
forms
00:04:
mm
begin
planting/growing sequencel#Kr'
: wm j
? km ryfch^ s-fclii
amp** p*i _iim| L.Ir.T^Ce .*!
-*:***m,*-:r
<#?*.'
J>biKm*; Lab* ?'
Appendix
Four:
Production
Stills