• No results found

House of Commons Library briefing paper : The forthcoming review of post-18 education and funding

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "House of Commons Library briefing paper : The forthcoming review of post-18 education and funding"

Copied!
29
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)
(3)

(4)

Change… Public costs

University

income Students

Graduates -who benefits the most?

Reduce tuition fees

Higher if compensate universities in full

Lower if not made up with

higher Govt. funding

Incentive effect for potential

students

Higher earners

Cut interest

rates Higher None

Possible

incentive effect

Higher earners

Increase loan repayment threshold

Higher None Possible incentive effect

Middle earners

Cut loan

repayment rate Higher None

Possible

incentive effect

Middle and higher earners

Reintroduce maintenance grants

Higher None

Incentive to those from low

income households

Poorer students who end up as higher earning

graduates

Fee waivers or

grants Higher

None if taxpayer funded

Incentive to those from low

income households

Poorer students who end up as higher earning

graduates

Differential fees Depends on how introduced

Depends on how introduced

Depends on how introduced

Depends on how introduced

Cap or control student numbers

Lower Lower

Some potential

students miss out. More likely

to be

disadvantaged?

None

SUMMARY

POTENTIAL IMPACT OF REFORMS TO HE FUNDING

(5)

• •

(6)

(7)

(8)

• •

(9)
(10)

PLANNED OVERALL SPENDING ON HE (£bn)

Teaching Research Student loans Grants & other 0 2 4 6 8 10

(11)

APPLICANTS AND ACCEPTANCES VIA UCAS millions Applicants Acceptances 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)

All estimates subject to considerable uncertainty

• Subsidy element -2%

points

• Loan outlays -£1.5bn

• Long term costs:

Loans -£0.3bn p.a, fees

+£1.5bn (2019-20)

• Higher earners

benefit the most

-£5k

-£3k -£1k +£1k

Low Middle High

(16)

(17)

• Loan outlays

unchanged

• Subsidy element

+4%

points

All estimates subject to considerable uncertainty

• Higher earners

benefit the most

• Long term costs

+£0.7bn p.a (2019-20)

-£5k -£3k -£1k +£1k

Low Middle High

(18)

All estimates subject to considerable uncertainty

• Subsidy element

+2%

points

• Loan outlays

unchanged

• Middle

/low earners

benefit most in %

• Long term costs

+£0.3bn p.a (2019-20)

• Middle

/high earners

benefit most in £s

-£5k -£3k -£1k +£1k

Low Middle High

(19)

All estimates subject to considerable uncertainty

• Loan outlays

unchanged

• Long term costs

+£0.5bn p.a (2019-20)

• Middle earners

benefit the most in £

and % terms

• Subsidy element

+3%

points

-£5k -£3k -£1k +£1k

Low Middle High

(20)

(21)
(22)

(23)

(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)

(29)
.

References

Related documents

• Offender learning and skills service (OLSS): the OLSS contracts with four organisations who provide learning and skills training for offenders in custody in England. These

Overall, the process evaluation findings indicate that the RCT was implemented in a robust manner, thereby lending weight to the conclusions of the impact assessment, namely that

This includes all formula-led funding, transitional protection funding, high needs funding, and those elements of student support funding provided through allocations to

In a written ministerial statement on 20 July 2015, the Skills Minister, Nick Boles, announced plans for “a restructuring of the post-16 education and training sector, through

Hence, the present study is carried out to compare the level of Plasma Cotinine, Serum B12 And Serum Ferritin to enlighten the etiological factor of Recurrent

R.ARVIND RAJ on “A STUDY COMPARING MODIFIED ALVARADO SCORE AND TZANAKI’S SCORE FOR DIAGNOSING ACUTE APPENDICITIS” during his M.S General Surgery course from May2016 to May 2019

Using small interfering RNA technology, we show that viral replication requires a high level of nucleolin expression, demonstrating for the first time a direct role for a

The efficient secretion of prM-E par- ticles from packaging cells stably expressing mutant NS2A- I59N replicon RNA demonstrates that this mutation does not affect the secretion of