• No results found

hjm

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "hjm"

Copied!
31
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

Creating spot rate trees:

 Assume that spot interest rates are normally distributed and

approximate it with a binomial distribution.

 Zero coupon bond prices and volatility of spot interest rates are

given for different maturities.

 Guess spot rate values for the next period.

 Absence of arbitrage allows the use of risk-neutral valuation of zero

coupon prices. If they don’t match with the given prices, iterate spot rates until it matches.

 Check that the volatility estimate matches the given volatility. If

they don’t match, iterate spot rates until it matches.

 Repeat these steps throughout the tree to get the arbitrage free

(3)
(4)
(5)

Alternative approach

An alternative and more flexible approach

takes the initial term structure as given and

models the evolution of forward rates. This is

the Heath-Jarrow-Morton model (1992).

“Bond Pricing and the Terms Structures of

Interest Rates: A New Methodology for

(6)

Forward Rates

The HJM model starts with the initial forward

rate curve

f

(0,

T

) for all

T

,

 where f(0,T) is the date-0 continuously

compounded forward interest rate for the future interval [T,T + ],

 and  is a small interval ( 0).

This implies

B

(0,

T

+

) =

B

(0,

T

)

e

–f(0,T)

.

So the initial forward curve

f

(0,

T

) can be

(7)

Forward Rates Evolution

Assume that the change in the forward rate is

normally distributed and described by:



f

(

t

,

T

) =

(

t

,

T

)

+

(

t

,

T

)

W

(

t

),

 where f(t,T) = f(t + ,T) – f(t,T) ) is the change

in the forward rate over the interval t to t +   (t,T) is the drift and (t,T)is the volatility,  W(t) is normally distributed with mean 0

and variance 

 and the evolution is under martingale

(8)

Volatility Specification

For implementation, assume that the forward

rate’s volatility is of the form



(

t

,

T

) =

exp[–

(

T

t

)]

 where   0 is a non-negative constant, volatility

reduction factor

Hence vol for the short-term forward rate (T-t

(9)

Forward Rate f(t,T)

f

(

t

,

T

) =

f

(0,

T

) + [

f

(

,

T

) –

f

(0,

T

)]

+ [

f

(2

,

T

) –

f

(

,

T

)] + …+ [

f

(

t

,

T

) -

f

(

t

,

T

)]

Using forward rate evolution specification

 this describes the evolution of the forward rate at time t in

terms of the initial forward rate curve f(0,T), the drifts, and the volatilities of the intermediate changes in forward rates.

(10)

The Spot Rate and Money

Market Account Evolution

Using definition of the spot rate, r(t) = f(t,t) gives spot

rate process

By definition, money market account’s value

A(0) =1 and A(t) = A(t –

)e

r(t – )

for all t, or

 Using spot rate process, A(t) can be described by initial

forward rates, drifts, and volatilities.

(11)

Normalized bond prices

Zero-coupon bond price can be similarly

expressed in terms of initial forward

rates, drifts, and volatilities.

) ( ) , ( ) , ( 0 0

)

,

0

(

)

(

)

,

(

v u t v u W v

v T v u t v T v u

e

T

B

t

A

T

t

B

 

                             

 

    T t u u t f

e

T

t

(12)

Arbitrage-Free Restrictions

A contribution of the Heath-Jarrow-Morton model is

to provide the restrictions needed on the drift and

volatility parameters of the forward rate process

such that the evolution is arbitrage-free.

We know that the zero-coupon bond price

processes are arbitrage-free if and only if the

normalized zero-coupon bond prices

B

(

t

,

T

)/

A

(

t

) are martingales. Alternatively stated,

(13)

Arbitrage-Free Restrictions

(cont’d)

Comparing this with normalized bond price

process, using properties of normal

distribution, rearranging terms and taking limits

as



0, we get

Under the martingale probabilities, the

expected change in the forward rate must be

this particular function of the volatility.

This is

the arbitrage-free forward rate drift restriction.

T

v

du

u

v

T

v

T

v

,

)

(

,

)

(

,

)

(

(14)

Hedging Treasury Bills

HJM gives the following expression for

zero-coupon bond’s price:

where, by definition

X

(

t

,

T

) = {1 – exp[–

(

T

t

)]}/

and

a

(

t

,

T

) =

(

2

/4

)

X

(

t

,

T

)

2

[1 – exp (– 2

t

)] for

> 0.

(15)

Hedging Treasury Bills (cont’d)

 At maturity date T, parameters simplify to

X(T,T) = 0 and a(T,T) = 0

yielding B(T,T) = B(0,T)/B(0,T) = 1 as required.

 In zero-coupon bond’s price, only spot rate r(t) is

random. Using a Taylor series expansion

 where partial derivatives are analogous to delta and gamma

hedging of equity options.

(16)

Delta and Gamma for a

Zero-Coupon Bond

Evaluating partial derivatives gives

 which is the hedge ratio or delta for the

zero-coupon bond.

 which is the gamma for the zero-coupon bond. 

Substituting these in bond price change

(17)

Example: Delta Neutral

Hedging

 A financial institution wants to hedge a one-year

zero-coupon bond using 2 other zero-coupon bonds with maturities of ½ year and 1½ years.

 Let n1 = # of ½-year zero-coupon bonds

and n2 = # of 1½-year zero-coupon bonds.

 Initial cost of the self-financed hedged portfolio

V(0) = 0.954200 + n1 0.977300 + n2 0.930850 = 0. Rewrite our first equation as

(18)
(19)

Example: Delta Neutral

Hedging (cont’d)

To be

delta neutral

the portfolio must be

insensitive to small changes in the spot rate

r

(

t

).

i.e.,

n

1

0.476635 +

n

2

1.29660 = –0.908041.

 This gives the 2nd equation in two unknowns.

Solving we get

n

1

= –0.4760 and

n

2

= –0.5254.

0 ) 1 , 0 ( ) 5 . 1 , 0 ( ) 5 . 0 , 0 ( 2

1

(20)

Example: Delta Neutral

Hedging (Observations)

 Thus, to hedge the 1-year zero-coupon bond:

 short 0.4760 of the ½-year zero-coupon bond

 and short 0.5254 of the 1½-year zero-coupon bond.

 To construct a synthetic 1-year zero-coupon bond, go

long in these 2 zero-coupon bonds.

 By traditional theory, duration of our hedging

portfolio must equal 1 which is the duration of the 1-year zero-coupon bond being hedged.

 This would give a different 2nd equation in n

1 and n2.

 But our hedging portfolio has duration 1.0261. So our hedge

(21)

Gamma Hedging

 A delta neutral portfolio is constructed to be

insensitive to small changes in the spot rate r(t).

 However, it is not insensitive to large changes in r(t),

where (r)2 term in expression for price change

cannot be neglected. E.g.,

 If r = 0.01, then (r)2 = 0.0001 and can be ignored.

 If r = 1, then (r)2 = 1 is of the same order of magnitude and cannot be ignored.

 Gamma neutral portfolio is neutral to larger shocks.

 To make a portfolio both delta and gamma neutral,

(22)

Options on Treasury Bills

A European call with a maturity of 35 days is

written on a 91-day T-bill with face value of $100.

 By convention, the maturity of the underlying T-bill is

fixed at 91 days over option’s life.

Strike price is quoted as a discount rate of 4.50%.

The dollar value of the strike is

K = [1 – (4.50/100)

(91/360)]

100

= 98.8625.

 The strike discount rate and the dollar strike price are

(23)

Options on Treasury Bills

(cont’d)

 European call’s payoff at expiration is

 where B(35,126) is the value at date 35 of a T-bill that

has 91 days left; hence it matures at date 126.

 Assume that forward rates follow the stochastic

process given in Chapter 16.

=> Forward and spot interest rates are normally distributed under the martingale probabilities. => Zero-coupon bond price is lognormal.

(24)

Options on Treasury Bills

(cont’d)

 European call on a T-Bill is

c(t) = 100 B(t,Tm)N(d1) – KB(t,T)N(d2),  where T

m = T + m,

 d

1 = {ln[100 B(t,Tm)/KB(t,T)] + c2/2}/c,

 d

2 = d1 – c,

 

c2 = (2/2){1 – exp[–2(T – t)]}X(T,Tm)2,

 X(T,T

m) = {1 – exp[–(Tm – T)]}/

 As T-bill price is lognormally distributed, this formula looks similar to the

Black-Scholes model.

 But there are important differences. Suppose at t = 0, the volatility

(25)
(26)

Hedging of Options on T-Bills

 Option value depends on prices of zero-coupon

bonds B(t,T) and B(t,Tm) which in turn depends on the spot rate r(t). Using a Taylor series expansion

 where

Hedge ratio = and

Gamma =

are defined as before.

(27)

Swaption

A

swaption

is an option on an interest rate

swap. Its holder has the right to enter into a

prespecified swap at a fixed future date.

Swaption (Receive Floating, Pay Fixed).

 The swap rate is R

S on a per annum basis.

 Swaption expires at date T.

 The swap has n fixed and floating rate payments

at dates T1, T2, . . . , Tn and ends on the last date

(28)

Why Swaption?

A company that is going to issue a

floating rate bond in 3 M time.

It plans to swap its liabilities into fixed

Long a swaption to pay fixed of 7% and

receive floating for 3 years

(29)

Swaption (cont’d)

As swaption’s maturity date

T

.

 The value of the floating rate payments is

NP  [1 – B(T,Tn)].

 The value of the fixed rate payments

The net value of the swap at maturity is

  n j j S

P R B T T

N 1 ). , ( ) 2 / (

      n j j S P n P

S T N B T T N R B T T

(30)

Swaption (cont’d)

As a newly issued swap at date T has zero value,

the holder will exercise swaption if V

S

(T)

0. Thus

swaption payoff at maturity date T is

Rewrite swap’s value

 Expression in bracket is the value of a Treasury bond

with coupon RS and face value NP. Let its value be Bc.       . 0 ) ( 0 0 ) ( ) ( ) ( T V if T V if T V T swaption S S S . ) , ( ) , ( ) 2 / ( ) (

1 

         

p n

n j j S P P

S T N N R B T T N B T T

(31)

Swaption (cont’d)

Swaption’s payoff at maturity date

T

is

The swaption is equivalent to a put

option on a bond with strike price

N

P

and can be valued by the HJM model.

  

  

. ) ( 0

) ( )

( )

(

T B N

if

T B N

if T

B N

T swaption

c P

c P

References

Related documents