• No results found

How OpenStack is implemented at GMO Public Cloud service

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "How OpenStack is implemented at GMO Public Cloud service"

Copied!
35
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

How OpenStack is implemented at GMO Public Cloud service

GMO Inetnet, Inc. Technical Evangelist Hironobu Saitoh

GMO Internet, Inc. Architect

(2)

Agenda

• About us

• Hosting/Cloud services in our business segments

• OpenStack

• Why we use OpenStack

• Technical background

• About difference of two services (ConoHa and GMO apps cloud)

(3)

About GMO Internet

http://gmo.jp/en

(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)

Public Clouds

(8)

プライベートクラウド基盤として

GMOグループの「GMOペパボ株式会社」が

プライベートクラウドとして利用

(9)

Why we use OpenStack

Feature linenups

Loosely coupled components

Open Source Software

Most of features needed for Cloud develop were already implemented

Different engineering team cloud develop each features simultaneously.

(10)

コンポーネント ConoHaの機能 リージョン

Keystone Account management,

authentication All regions

Nova Virtual Machine All regions

Neutron Private networking

Assign IP address for VM All regions

Cinder Block storage All regions

Swift Object store Tokyo

Glance Create VM image

Auto Backup All regions

Ceilometer

Collect customer usage data Cooperate with our payment

system

Tokyo

Heat Initialize VM by cloud-init All regions

Horizon (Staff only) All regions

(11)

Develop  OpenStack related  tools

Tool  that  create  Docker host.

Golang

Develop  Vagrant  provider  for  ConoHa.

Fix  a  problem  and  pull  request.

Docker Machine

(12)

CLI  tool  that  handle  ConoHa specific  APIs

Golang

Develop  plugin  that  enable  to  save  media  files   to  Swift(Object  Store)

Develop  OpenStack related  tools

https://github.com/hironobu-­s/conoha-­iso

(13)

Finally

• About us (Hironobu Saitoh)

• Hosting/Cloud services in our business segments

• OpenStack (Hironobu Saitoh)

• Why we use OpenStack

• Technical background (Naoto Gohko)

• About difference of two services (ConoHa and GMO apps cloud)

(14)

Oname.com VPS(Diablo)   • Service  XaaS model:

– VPS  (KVM,  libvirt) • Network:

– 1Gbps

• Network  model:  

– Flat-­VLAN  (Nova  Network) – IPv4  only

• Public  API

– None  (only  web-­panel) • Glance – None • Cinder – None • ObjectStorage – None

(15)
(16)

Oname.com VPS(Diablo)  

• Nova  Network:  

– very  simple(LinuxBridge)

– Flat  networking  is  scalable.

è

But  

There  is  no  added  value,  such  as  a  free  

configuration  of  the  network

(17)

ConoHa(Grizzly)

• Service  XaaS model:

– VPS  +  Private  networks  (KVM  +  libvirt) • Network:

– 10Gbps  wired(10GBase-­T) • Network  model:  

– Flat-­VLAN  +  Quantam ovs-­GRE  overlay – IPv6/IPv4  dualstack

• Public  API

– None  (only  web-­panel) • Glance

– None • Cinder

– None

• ObjectStorage

– Swift  (After  Havana)

(18)

ConoHa(Grizzly)

• Quantam Network:

– It  was  using  the  initial  version  of  the  Open  vSwitch full  mesh  

GRE-­vlan overlay  network

è

But

When  the  scale  becomes  large,  

Localization  occurs  to  a  specific  node  of  the  

communication  of  the  GRE-­mesh-­tunnel

(with  under  cloud  network(L2)  problems)

(Broadcast  storm?)

(19)

GMO  AppsCloud(Havana) • Service  XaaS model:

– KVM  compute  +  Private  VLAN  networks  +  Cinder  +  Swift

• Network:

– 10Gbps  wired(10GBase   SFP+)

• Network  model:  

– IPv4  Flat-­VLAN  +  Neutron  LinuxBridge(not  ML2)  +  Brocade  ADX  L4-­LBaaS  original  driver

• Public  API

– Provided  the  public  API

• Ceilometer • Glance

– Provided(GlusterFS)

• Cinder

– HP  3PAR(Active-­Active  Multipath  original)  +  NetApp

• ObjectStorage

– Swift  cluster  

• Bare-­Metal   Compute

– Modifiyed cobbler  bare-­metal  deploy  driver.

(20)

GMO  AppsCloud(Havana)  public  API

Web  panel(httpd,  php)

API  wrapper  proxy (httpd,  php

Framework:  fuel  php)

Havana Nova  API

Customer  sys  API

Havana Neutron API Havana Glance  API OpenStack API for input validation Customer DB Havana Keystone  API OpenStack API Havana Cinder  API Havana Ceilometer  API

Endpoint  L7:reverse  proxy

Havana Swift  Proxy

(21)
(22)
(23)

Havana:  baremetal compute  cobbler  driver

Baremetal net: • Bonding  NIC • Taged VLAN

(24)

Swift  cluster  (Havana  to  Juno  upgrade)

SSD  storage:

container/account  server   at  every  zone    

(25)

Havana:  baremetal compute  Cisco  iOS  in  southbound

(26)

OpenStack Juno:  2  service  cluster,  released

Mikumo ConoHa Mikumo Anzu

Mikumo =  美雲

=  Beautiful  cloud

New  Juno  region  released:  

10/26/2015

(27)

• Service  model:   Public  cloud  by  KVM • Network:  10Gbps  wired(10GBase   SFP+) • Network  model:  

– Flat-­VLAN  +  Neutron  ML2  ovs-­VXLAN   overlay  +  ML2  LinuxBridge(SaaS  only) – IPv6/IPv4  dualstack

• LBaaS:  LVS-­DSR(original) • Public  API

– Provided  the  public  API  (v2  Domain)

• Compute   node:  ALL  SSD  for  booting   OS

– Without  Cinder  boot  

• Glance:  provided

• Cinder:   SSD  NexentaStore zfs (SDS) • Swift  (shared  Juno  cluster)

• Cobbler   deply on  under-­cloud

– Ansible configuration

• SaaS  original   service  with  keystone  auth

– Email,  web,  CPanel and  WordPress

OpenStack Juno:  2  service  cluster,  released

• Service  model:   Public  cloud  by  KVM • Network:  10Gbps  wired(10GBase   SFP+) • Network  model:  

– L4-­LB-­Nat  +  Neutron  ML2  LinuxBridge VLAN – IPv4  only

• LBaaS:  Brocade  ADX  L4-­NAT-­LB(original) • Public  API

– Provided  the  public  API

• Compute   node:   Flash  cached  or  SSD • Glance:  provided   (NetApp  offload) • Cinder:   NetApp  storage

• Swift  (shared  Juno  cluster) • Ironic  on  under-­cloud

– Compute  server  deploy  with  Ansible config

• Ironic  baremetal compute

– Nexsus Cisco  for  Tagged  VLAN  module – ioMemory configuration

(28)

Compute  and  Cinder(zfs):  SSD

Toshiba  enterprise  SSD

• The  balance  of  cost  and  performance  we  have  taken. • Excellent  IOPS  performance,  low  latency

Compute  local  SSD

The  benefits  of  SSD  of  Compute  of  local  storage • The  provision  of  high-­speed  storage  

than  cinder  boot.

• It  is  easy  to  take  online  live  snapshot  of  vm instance. • deployment  of  vm is  fast.

ConoHa:  Compute  option  was  modified: • take  online  live  snapshot  of  vm instance.

http://toshiba.semicon-­storage.com/jp/product/storage-­ products/publicity/storage-­20150914.html

(29)

NexentaStor zfs cinder:  ConoHa cloud(Juno)

(30)

Designate  DNS:  ConoHa cloud(Juno)

Client API

DNS Identify

Endpoint

Storage DB OpenStack

Keystone

Backend DB

RabbitMQ

Central

(31)

NetApp  storage:  GMO  Appscloud(Juno)

If  you  are  using  the  same  Cluster  onTAP NetApp  a  Glance  and  Cinder  storage,  it  is   possible  to  offload  a  copy  of  the  inter-­service   of  OpenStack as  the  processing  of  NetApp   side.  

• Create  volume  from  glance  image

((glance  the  image  is  converted  (ex:  qcow2  to   raw)  required  that  does  not  cause  the  

(32)

Ironic  with  undercloud:  GMO  Appscloud(Juno)

For  Compute  server  deployment. Kilo  Ironic  and  All-­in-­one

• Compute  server:  10G  boot • Clout-­init:  network

• Compute  setup:  Ansible Under-­cloud  Ironic(Kilo): It  will  use  a  different   network  and  Ironic   Baremetal dhcp for   Service  baremetal compute  Ironic(Kilo).

(33)

Ironic(Kilo)  baremetal:  GMO  Appscloud(Juno)

Boot  baremetal instance • baremetal server

(with  Fusion  ioMemory SanDisk) • 1G  x4  bonding  +  Tagged  VLAN • Clout-­init:  network  +  lldp

• Network:  Nexsus Cisco Allowd VLAN  security Ironic  Kilo  +  Juno:  Fine • Ironic  Python  driver • Whole  Image  write

(34)

• Service  model:   Public  cloud  by  KVM • Network:  10Gbps  wired(10GBase   SFP+) • Network  model:  

– Flat-­VLAN  +  Neutron  ML2  ovs-­VXLAN   overlay  +  ML2  LinuxBridge(SaaS  only) – IPv6/IPv4  dualstack

• LBaaS:  LVS-­DSR(original) • Public  API

– Provided  the  public  API  (v2  Domain)

• Compute   node:  ALL  SSD  for  booting   OS

– Without  Cinder  boot  

• Glance:  provided

• Cinder:   SSD  NexentaStore zfs (SDS) • Swift  (shared  Juno  cluster)

• Cobbler   deply on  under-­cloud

– Ansible configuration

• SaaS  original   service  with  keystone  auth

– Email,  web,  CPanel and  WordPress

OpenStack Juno:  2  service  cluster,  released

• Service  model:   Public  cloud  by  KVM • Network:  10Gbps  wired(10GBase   SFP+) • Network  model:  

– L4-­LB-­Nat  +  Neutron  ML2  LinuxBridge VLAN – IPv4  only

• LBaaS:  Brocade  ADX  L4-­NAT-­LB(original) • Public  API

– Provided  the  public  API

• Compute   node:   Flash  cached  or  SSD • Glance:  provided   (NetApp  offload) • Cinder:   NetApp  storage

• Swift  (shared  Juno  cluster) • Ironic  on  under-­cloud

– Compute  server  deploy  with  Ansible config

• Ironic  baremetal compute

– Nexsus Cisco  for  Tagged  VLAN  module – ioMemory configuration

(35)

Finally:

The  GMO  AppsCloud  in  Juno  OpenStack  it  was  released  on  10/27/2015.

• Deployment  of  SanDisk  Fusion  ioMemory by  Kilo  Ironic  on  Juno  OpenSack I   can  also.

• Compute  server  was  deployed  by  Kilo  Ironic  with  under-­cloud  All-­in-­One   openstack.    Compute  server  configuration  was  deployed  by  Ansible.

• Cinder  and  Glance  was  provied NetApp  copyoffload storage  mechanism.   • LbaaS is  Brocade  ADX  NAT  mode  original  driver.

On  the  otherhand;;

Juno  OpenStack ConoHa released  on  05/18/2015.

• Designate  DNS  and  GSLB  service  was  started  on  ConoHa.

• Cinder  storage  is  SDS  provied NexentaStor zfs storage  for  single  volume  type. • LBaaS is  LVS-­DSR  original  driver.

References

Related documents

Phase-resolved spectroscopy shows broad Balmer absorption lines from the DA white dwarf and phase-dependent Balmer emission lines originating on the irradiated side of the red

The system responds showing the document page (like in the Claroline version) adding also some links for converting html files into php (one link for each html file).. To

of staf f (FTE) Range of services Example pr ofessions A 2010: $1.2 million 2013: $0.5 million * SA Health State managed 2010: 16 (13.5) 2013: 10 (8.1) Early childhood,

While the results did not determine whether Primavera was primarily used as a result of being a contract requirement, despite the responses received from the owners on the perception

“Over-allotment Option” the option expected to be granted by our Company to the International Placing Underwriters, exercisable by Sole Global Coordinator (on behalf of

External Ecosystem Marketplace App API API Economy services API analytics API commerce API collaboration API location API data API API Software as a Service

The domain decomposition method involves the par- titioning of a complete solution into smaller domains to be optimized in parallel. For SimE, this implies the parallelization of

API-1 Validation US1 - Texas API-2 Validation US1 - California API-3 Validation EU1 - Sweden API-4 Validation EU2 - England API-5 Validation AS1 – New Zeeland KSM-8 Key