COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS O P I N I O N
Full text
Related documents
After amending the discovery control plan by an agreed order, Sibley, P.C. filed an amended original answer on August 4, 2009. In the amendment, Sibley, P.C. asserted
The parties have entered into a joint stipulation confirming that the only disputed issues between them are (1) whether a right of survivorship exists among the grantees; and
Appellants raise four issues on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in granting Plaintiff Clayton’s motion for partial summary judgment and denying Defendants’ motion and in
3 The OAG also challenges the adequacy of Rodriguez’s reports to her immediate supervisors and the Ombudsman. However, Rodriguez did not identify these individuals in her
To establish that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to rule, the relator must show that the trial court: (1) had a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act; (2)
#1 trustee. On her application, Wayne stated that as of the date of her application, she had resided continuously in the State of Texas for thirty-eight years and eight months and
We reversed and remanded the case for new trial after holding that Appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorneys failed to preserve the trial court’s error
No person shall be a Representative, unless he be a citizen of the United States, and, at the time of his election, a qualified voter of this State, and shall have been