• No results found

Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST)Act

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST)Act"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Fixing America’s Surface

Transportation (FAST)Act

Active Transportation Forum

(2)

• Replaces the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act

(MAP-21) of 2012

• 5-year bill (FY 2016-2020) – reauthorizes the federal surface

transportation programs through FY2020

• Two new programs that focus on Freight

• Maintains many current program structures and funding shares • No federal gas tax increase

(3)

FAST Act – December 4, 2015

Dec. 4

th

2015, President Obama signed

into law

The first long-term comprehensive

surface transportation legislation since

the SAFETEA-LU Act of 2005

Reconciled the STRR Act (House of

Representatives) and the DRIVE Act

(Senate)

All Pennsylvania Congressional

Representatives and Senators voted for

Fast Act

(4)

5-year, $305 billion measure provides:

$286 billion for the federal highway and public transportation

programs

 $225.2 billion for highways

 $48.7 billion for mass transit

$7 billion for highway and motor carrier safety

$24 billion in General Funds appropriations for Amtrak, mass

transit, and NTHSA

74% 16% 2% 8% Highways Transit Safety Appropriations $305 Billion in Total Funding Authorizations

(5)

Highway Trust Fund

The FAST Act fails to address the Highway Trust Fund’s

permanent structural revenue deficit

Relies on $70 billion of “pay-fors” from the General Fund

 Transfer from the capital surplus account of the Federal Reserve  Sale of crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve

 Increased Customs fees, dividend reductions for banks, increased tax delinquency penalties

No

increase in federal gas tax (remains at 18.4₵ per gallon)

 A permanent solution is still needed, it is the major challenge facing the

future of highway and public transportation programs

(6)

SPC Highway & Bridge

 Additional $101.5M for 2017-2020 SPC TIP

$-$100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 NHPP STP State Highway (Capital) State

Bridge System Off Bridges

HSIP National Freight Program

Rail CMAQ TAP STP-U

SPC - FAST SPC - MAP-21

(7)

SPC FFY 2017-2020 Highway

Program Funding

NHPP, $519,325 STP, $170,496 State Hwy, $400,107 State Bridge, $200,858 Off System Bridges, $73,396 HSIP, $43,240 CMAQ, $75,436 TAP, $7,217 STP-Urban, $132,427 In millions, ($000) Total of $1.622B for the 4-year TIP
(8)

Pennsylvania & SPC Transit

Additional $176.7M

Federal Transit to PA

$48.9M of it to SPC

for 2017-2020 TIP

$-$200,000,000 $400,000,000 $600,000,000 $800,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,200,000,000 $1,400,000,000 $1,600,000,000

Federal Transit State Transit SPC - FAST

(9)

Public Transit

Overall Increased Funding

: Provides a total of $61 billion over 5 years, growing transit funding by almost 18% over the 5-year authorization

 Urbanized Area Formula Grants

 Increases 10.6% by FY2020

 State of Good Repair Program

 15.7% increase over previous funding level

 Capital Investment Program

 Small Start – BRT Inclusion

 Rural Area Impacts:

 Rural Area Formula Program increases by 10.8 %

Bus and Bus Facilities Program

 Includes competitive program for no/low emission buses

(10)

Rail Transportation

Obligates funding to rail programs for the first time

within the surface transportation bill

Modest annual funding increase for Amtrak

Joint Public Transportation and Inter-City Passenger

(11)

New & Increased Emphasis on Freight

Establishes a National Highway Freight Network (NHFN)

Requires all States that receive formula funds to develop a State Freight Investment Plan or incorporated into the State’s LRP

Creates two new funding streams:

National Highway Freight Program – distributed to states by

highway program apportionment formula, averaging ~$1.2 billion annually

Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (FASTLANE)

– discretionary program for major highway and freight projects of national or regional significance

(12)

Discretionary Programs

TIGER

Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery

FASTLANE

Fostering Advancements in Shipping & Transportation for the Long-term Achievement

of National Efficiencies

 The U.S. DOT competitive grant

program was included in the $1.1 trillion Omnibus Appropriations bill

singed into law on December 18th

 The FFY 2016-2017 allocation

remained at $500 million nationwide

 The TIGER program has funded four

projects in the region, totaling over $27 million

• 2012 - $15m for the East Liberty Transit

Center

• 2011 - $10m for the Carrie Furnace

Flyover Bridge

 $4.5 billion authorized through FY20  $800 million for FY16

 25% for rural projects

 10% for small projects , < $100 million

 Eligible projects:

 Highway freight projects on NHFN

 Highway/bridge projects on NHS

 Grade crossing or seperation

 Other freight projects that are:

 Intermodal/rail freight, private

(13)

Planning and Design Standards

Planning:

• Increased Metropolitan Planning factors to 10

with the addition of “addressing resiliency and reliability “ and “enhancing travel and tourism”

• Public ports & intermodal facilities now

included in long range plan

Complete Streets Policy

 Encourages states and MPO’s to set design standards to accommodate all

road users – or a “Complete Streets” approach to roadway design

 US DOT required to produce a report on implementation and best practices

of the policy in two years.

Design Standards:

•Locals permitted to use a

design guide publication different than PennDOT’s

(14)

History of Ped/Bike Funding

 Since 1991 the biggest sources of funding for bicycle and

pedestrian projects have been the Transportation

Enhancements (TE) program, Surface Transportation Program (STP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program, Recreational Trails Program (RTP), and the Safe Routes to

School (SRTS) program.

 In 2012, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century

(MAP-21) combined the TE, SRTS, and the RTP programs into one – Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

(15)

SPC FFY 2017-2020 Highway

Program Funding

NHPP, $519,325 STP, $170,496 State Hwy, $400,107 State Bridge, $200,858 Off System Bridges, $73,396 HSIP, $43,240 CMAQ, $75,436 TAP, $7,217 STP-Urban, $132,427 In millions, ($000) Total of $1.622B for the 4-year TIP
(16)

What Does FAST mean for

Active Transportation?

FAST renamed STP into Surface Transportation Block

Grant (STBG) program and the TAP becomes a set-aside

program within STBG.

So…what used to be the Transportation Alternatives

Program (which used to be the TE, SRTS, and RT program)

is now the “Surface Transportation Block Grant Set-aside

Program”

TE, SRTS, RTP

TAP

(MAP-21)

STBG

(FAST) • Set-Aside Program (STBGSP)
(17)

STBGP (formerly TAP) Funding

TAP funding was set at 2% of all the core highway

programs and yielded approximately $820m in FY

2015.

Funding levels in the new STBGSP are set at $835m

for FY2016 and FY2017, rising to $850m in FY

2018-2020.

Funding amounts could have been much less.

 There were amendments proposed that would have

significantly reduced funding sources for bicycle and pedestrian projects

(18)
(19)

STBGSP – Policy Changes

The Good

 Nonprofit organizations are now eligible to apply  Slight funding increase over the life of the bill

 The program maintains its competitive nature.  Annual reporting requirements

The Bad

 Metropolitan areas with their own funding can use 50% for

roads and bridges.

 The funding program is no longer a stand-alone program

The Ugly

(20)

Questions?

Dan Alwine

Project Development Specialist

dalwine@spcregion.org

References

Related documents

Payers and providers can reap the efficiency benefits of administrative simplification by working with their banks to position themselves for important elements of the PPACA that

The plan updates comply with regulatory requirements of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act (FAST Act) and successive federal transportation authorization

To clarify several issues about the precipitation strengthening of AZ91: (1) to gain a better understanding of the current precipitation strengthening modelling of AZ91; (2) to

Three (3) project sites were selected at the following schools: Alameda Elementary School, May Roberts Elementary School, and Ontario Middle School.. This report will provide

A Medicare set aside (hereinaft er MSA) is a tool that allows a workers’ compensation claimant to preserve Medicare benefi ts by setting aside a portion of the settlement money in

Measurements of regional and global peak negative strain in acute anterior infarction 1.5 h after reperfusion therapy can predict final infarct size better than LVEF and correlate

To utilize STP funds, project design and construction must be in accordance with IDOT and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standards and criteria. Public information meetings

However, each municipal sponsor will be limited to no more than two (2) awarded projects to be included in the active program during each call for projects. Projects spanning