• No results found

Comparing Maturity Models: CMMI®, OPM3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Comparing Maturity Models: CMMI®, OPM3"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

PMOZ Conference 1 28-31 August 2007

Comparing Maturity Models:

CMMI

®

, OPM3

®

and P3M3

®

Lynda Bourne, Mosaic Project Services Angela Tuffley, Software Quality Institute

® CMMI is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Carnegie Mellon University

OPM3 and PMBOK are marks of Project Management Institute, Inc P3M3 is a mark of Office of Government Commerce UK (OGC)

Why Maturity Models?

• Assessing an organisation’s capability against recognised maturity models can provide:

– Substantial ROI (estimated >4:1) – A known and independently verified

maturity

– A prioritised roadmap to get to the next level

– Comparison with other organisations

(2)

PMOZ Conference 3 28-31 August 2007

Why Maturity Models?

• Research shows that organisations who improve their process maturity gain:

– improved schedule and budget predictability – improved cycle time

– increased productivity

– improved quality (as measured by defects) – increased customer satisfaction

– improved employee morale – increased return on investment – decreased cost of quality

Carnegie Mellon University: data provided by Angela Tuffley, Software Quality Institute

Today’s Focus

• Three Maturity models will be compared on the basis of:

– Maturity Criteria – Functional Criteria

• These models are:

– OPM3 from PMI

– CMMI from Software Engineering Institute (SEI):

Carnegie Mellon University

– P3M3 from Office of Government Commerce UK (OGC)

(3)

PMOZ Conference 5 28-31 August 2007

The Starting Point

• PMI engaged a number of international model experts

– In Australia

• Angela Tuffley

– CMMI

• Lynda Bourne

– OPM3 and PMBOK

• Spreadsheets distributed to experts to record their reviews

– Comparison of specific aspects of both models

Disclaimer

• The following comparisons between CMMI and OPM3 are based on the results of this work

BUT

• The information presented here is

based on a different approach and

different evaluation methodology

(4)

PMOZ Conference 7 28-31 August 2007

Representations of Maturity

• CMMI

– Staged (Levels 1 -5) – Continuum

• OPM3

– Continuum

• P3M3

– Staged (Levels 1 -5)

• Certifications cover all or part of an organisation

CMMI

• The Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)

– Developed by the Software Engineering Institute (SEI)

– Assist organisations to improve processes for developing and maintaining the

products and services of the organisation

• Focus on disciplines:

– Software and systems engineering – Integrated product and process

development

(5)

PMOZ Conference 9 28-31 August 2007

CMMI Representations

OPM3

• The Organizational Project

Management Maturity Model (OPM3)

– Developed by the Project Management

Institute (PMI)

– Assists organisations improve capabilities for managing projects, programs and portfolios, leading to business

improvement.

– Developed from PMI’s standards:

• PMBOK, and the standards for Program Portfolio Management

(6)

PMOZ Conference 11 28-31 August 2007

OPM3 reports

P3M3

• Portfolio, Programme and Project

Management Maturity Model (P3M3)

• Developed by UK Government’s Office of Government Commence (OGC)

• Portfolio, programme and project management are nested within the P3M3 model, building on:

– PRINCE2 (for projects)

– Managing Successful Programmes (MSP)

(7)

PMOZ Conference 13 28-31 August 2007

P3M3 overview

Maturity Criteria Results

Criteria CMMI OPM3 P3M3

Background Exists Exists Exists

Explanation of Model Architecture

Exists Exists Exists

Explanatory Text Exists Exists Exists

Assessment Partially Exists Exists Exists

Improvement Exists Exists Exists

Multiple Representations Exists Exists Exists Compatibility Does not Exist Does not Exist Does not Exist

References Exists Exists Exists

Sample Case Study Exists Partially Exists Does not Exist Content Amplification Exists Does not Exist Does not Exist

Comparison model in this and succeeding slide provided by Angela Tuffley, Software Quality Institute

(8)

PMOZ Conference 15 28-31 August 2007

Function Criteria Results

F u n c t i o n C r i t e r i a C M M I O P M 3 P 3 M 3

L in k to S t r a te g y E x i s ts P a r ti a ll y

e x i s t s

E x i s ts

P r o g r a m M a n a g e m e n t P a rt ia ll y

e x is t s

E x is t s E x i s ts

P r o j e c t v . P r o g r a m P a rt ia ll y

e x is t s

E x is t s E x i s ts

M a n a g e R e l a t e d P r o j e c ts E x i s ts P a r ti a ll y e x i s t s

E x i s ts

P r o g r a m M a n a g e m e n t P r o c e s s e s E x i s ts E x is t s E x i s ts R o l e o f P r o g r a m M a n a g e r D o e s n o t

e x is t

P a r ti a ll y e x i s t s

E x i s ts

P o r t fo l i o M a n a g e m e n t D o e s n o t

e x is t

E x is t s E x i s ts

P r o j e c t S e l e c ti o n D o e s n o t

e x is t

P a r ti a ll y e x i s t s

E x i s ts

R e v ie w P r o j e c t s a g a i n s t C o n t in u e o r T e r m in a te C r i te r i a

D o e s n o t e x is t

E x is t s D o e s n o t e x i s t P o r t fo l i o M a n a g e m e n t P r o c e s s e s D o e s n o t

e x is t

E x is t s P a r t ia l l y e x i s ts R o l e o f P o r t fo li o M a n a g e r D o e s n o t

e x is t

P a r ti a ll y e x i s t s

D o e s n o t e x i s t

R o l e o f P r o j e c t M a n a g e r E x i s ts E x is t s E x is t s

P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t in C o n te x t o f G e n e r a l M a n a g e m e n t

P a rt ia ll y e x is t s

E x is t s P a r t ia l l y e x i s ts O r g a n iz a t io n a l P r o je c t M a n a g e m e n t

P r o c e s s e s

E x i s ts E x is t s E x is t s

Conclusions

• CMMI offers two approaches to maturity assessment:

– Staged and continuous

• OPM3 offers reports on:

– A continuum of best practice – By project, program, portfolio

– Stages of improvement (S, M, C, I)

• P3M3 offers reports by stages over all

three domains

(9)

PMOZ Conference 17 28-31 August 2007

Conclusions

• CMMI (and predecessors) has been used by organisations for many years

– Statistical proof of effectiveness

• OPM3 offers most comprehensive assessment and reporting

– Supported by software

• P3M3 offers a staged approach that

supports an organization’s journey through progressive maturity in all three domains

References

Related documents

Where to get help Your doctor Neurologist MS Australia Tel. 1800 042 138

______LEAVING THE LIGHTHOUSE DORMS DURING THE NIGHT WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION, NO ONE IS TO BE OUTSIDE OF THE LIGHTHOUSE DORMS AFTER THE (10:00 P.M.) CURFEW FOR ANY REASON UNLESS

1 PIPE 2 CARBON BURN-SHIELD TM008 3 ASSEMBLY KIT INOX COLLECTOR Kit components ASSEMBLY NOTE: MONTESA CARBON SILENCER Kit components. ASSEMBLY NOTE: TO BE MOUNTED

In this study, we analyze a periodic review capacitated inventory system with supply uncertainty where advance demand information is available. There are two parties involved:

competence or properly train the claimant in his work, while in Kristy Lee the vessel owner did not have to make any inquiry into the captain’s competence or training. How many

In recent years we have seen a rapid propagation of mass-market consumer software that takes inspiration from video games. Usually referred to as ‘gamification’, this trend refers

Foram calculadas as taxas de incidência das internações por acidentes de moto na Bahia; incidência de internação por macrorregião de saúde, custo percapita das

The methodology used to collect data and analyze accident reports is detailed next and entails four steps: (1) collecting construction accident reports from OSHA Phoenix, AZ